TECHNICAL COMPENDIUM

PRIMUS
ULTIMATE WHOLE BODY DXA
FOR EVERYONE

Ver. OT-2019-001
 Ver. OT-2019-001

Contents
02 OSTEOSYS

MISSION & CORE VALUE

INTRODUCTION OF OSTEOSYS
FULL LINEUP

06 PRIMUS
GENERAL SPEC.
TECH SPEC. IN DETAIL
LOCKING OUT APPLICATION

19 RESEARCH THEME & SALES SEGMENTS

22 SAMPLE REPORT

39 ROOM LAYOUT
 MISSION & CORE VALUE

Passi
on

Tru s t

io n
at
02 03

ov
Inn
MISSION & CORE VALUE
INTRODUCTION OF OSTEOSYS
FULL LINEUP MISSION
Better Products for Better Life

PASSION
Passion is the driving force and one of the prerequisites for achieving our goal.
We try to reach our goal through an efficient cooperation with talented employees
who have the passion and responsibility fortheir mission.

INNOVATION
In order to meet our customer’s satisfaction, we produce more effective and
differentiated product through the innovation which is impetus of the foundation of
company growth together with passion.

TRUST
We operate the company by honest and transparent management which is based
on the trust. OsteoSys strives for creation of win-win corporate culture of good
circulation.
 INTRODUCTION OF OSTEOSYS FULL LINEUP

The One and Only Company with Full BMD Lineup

(QUS, DXA)

SONOST SONOST
BeeTLe EXA 3000 EXA Presto DEXXUM T EXCELLUS PRIMUS
2000 3000

04 QUS ̻ ̻ ̻ 05
≊

Established in 2000
≊


Products Installation
≊

DXA BMD system : About 6,000 installation base (Dec, 2018) Peripheral ̻ ̻ ̻ ̻ ̻
≊

QUS BMD System : About 10,000 installation base (Dec, 2018)

≊


70+ employees worldwide (R&D 30)
≊

$15 Million of revenue in 2018
Central ̻ ̻
≊

130 distributors in global market

≊


Headquarters in Guro-gu,Seoul, South KOREA Whole Body ̻
≊

Chinese corporation in Shanghai (Established in 2012)

≊

www.osteosys.com

Cone Beam ̻ ̻

History of OsteoSys = History of BMD Pencil Beam ̻

20 Years’ Experience of Bone Mineral Densitometry
Fan Beam ̻ ̻
2018 Launched 3rd Gen. QUS (BeeTLe) and 1st Gen. FPD Animal DXA (iNSiGHT)

2015 Launched 1st Gen. Half body Fan beam DXA DXA ̻ ̻ ̻ ̻ ̻

2013 Launched 1st Gen. Whole body DXA (with Body composition& Assessment)

2011 Launched 2nd Gen. pDXA

2009 Awarded Good Design (DEXXUM T)

2008 Launched 2nd Gen. Pencil beam DXA (compact design & fold wing bed Down)

2005 Launched 1st Central DXA (First pencil beam table type DXA)

2004 Launched 2nd Gen. QUS (Waterless probe)

2001 Launched 1st Gen. pDXA (Peripheral Cone Beam DXA)

2000 Established The Company with 1st Gen. QUS

R&D Center Office Cafeteria Factory Line
06 PRIMUS 07

GENERAL SPEC.

TECH SPEC. IN DETAIL

LOCKING OUT APPLICATION

 GENERAL SPEC. TECH SPEC. IN DETAIL

Ver. OT-2019-001
Component Parameter Spec.
Type Whole Body DXA (with total body composition)
Method Narrow fast Fan-beam
Principle Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry scan
APSpine(L1-L4), Femur, Dual Femur, Forearm, Lateral,
Scan Site VFA(LVA, APVA), TotalBody, Infant, Othopedics(Prosthesis Hip),
Prosthesis Knee, Hand, Animal, Study(Free Region)
Scanning Method Rectilinear scan
Reproducibility ⴍ 1.0% CV.
BMD Precision (in vitro & in vivo) < 1.0%
Reference Age (infant : 0-3, pediatric : 4-19, adult : 20 ~ 99)
Clinical Parameters Input age (0-150), Patient weigt supported: 0 ~ 210kg
(Max. patient weight for software : 150kg)
Automatic Calibration Available with daily calibration phantom
Measure Time

08 Spine 26 sec. (Normal Mode) / 9 sec. (Fast Mode) 09

Femur 17 sec. (Normal Mode) / 15 sec. (Fast Mode)
Forearm 17 sec.
Lateral 41 sec.
LVA(Lateral Vetebral Assessment) 3 min 9 sec. (LVA) / 1 min 44 sec. (APVA)
Whole Body 7 min.(Ergonomic) / 11 min.(Standard mode) *Depends on height
Drive System Stepper motor with reinforced drive belts
Size of X-ray Fileld at Table Top 640mm x 2050mm (scan area)
Shelf Life 10 years

System BMD(g/⽊), BMC(g), T-score, Z-score, Area(⽊), BMI

Technical specifications Body Composition
: FAT(g), LEAN(g), TISSUE(g), BMC(g), Total(g), BMC(%),
≊


Whole body DXA(Total body composition and Assessment) FAT(%), BMC(%), LEAN(%)
≊

Narrow fan beam Regional Body Composition
: Head, Arm(L, R), Trunk(L, R), Leg(L, R), Android, Gynoid
≊

Scan site : Whole body, AP spine, Femur(Dual femur), Foream, Lateral spine, LVA
Pediatrics(APSpine, Femur, TotalBody)
≊


Scan area : 2020 x 580mm / 2020 x 620mm(Optional) HA(Hip Analysis)
≊

Scan time : AP spine - 30Sec.(±2Sec.) Mesureing Information Scoliosis, Kyphosis
AFF
Femur - 25Sec.(±2Sec.) Hand
Forearm - 23Sec. (±2Sec.) GDP(Growth, development and prediction of body height in children)
BScope, LScope
Whole body : 7Min.(Ergonomic) / 11Min.(Standard mode)
FRAX
* Depends on height VAT(Visceral Adipose Tissue)
≊


Automatic real one-scan Color Image View(RCM, BCM, OCM)
≊

Reproducibility : ≤1.0% C.V.
Body Map(Scoliosys Cutoff Supported with AWGS, IWGS, EWGS)
≊

Measured parameter : BMD, BMC, BMI, T-score, Z-score, Area, Total body BMD, Type High Frequency (Monotank)
Total body Composition(Fat / Lean / BMC), HA(Hip Analysis), Dual femur Voltage 110VAC / 220VAC ± 10%
≊

Total body composition And Various whole body assessment Frequency 50/60Hz
≊


Orthopedics / Pediatrics / FRAX / B-Scope(Body-Scope) / Color mapping / Ergonomic scan / Number of Phases Single (1)
Trend report / DICOM & PACS Lowest Current Time Product 3mAs (0.2mA, 15 sec.)
≊

Dimension : 2784 x 1045 x 1258mm(Standard) / 2284 x 1045 x 1258mm(SB)
Required Over-Current Releases 5.2-2.6Amp (5.2 !
110v and 2.6 !
220v)
≊


Table height : 650mm
Nominal Output 249 W
≊

Weight : 210kg

Output Frequency DC
≊

Power consumption : 110VAC / 220VAC(+/-10%)

Rating Value (filament current) 0.2mA ~3.0mA ! 83 kV

kV Range 83 kV
Maximum Tube Voltage 90KV
 Ver. OT-2019-001 Ver. OT-2019-001
Component Parameter Spec. Component Parameter Spec.
Maximum Tube Current 3.0 mA Type CdTe (Cadmium Telluride) crystals
Beam Angle 5˚ Lacalization Above the patient
Detector Material CdTe (Cadmium Telluride) crystals
mAs Range for Radiography 0.2mAs, 83kv, 0.2mA, 1 sec
X-ray Generator Size 7mm x 3mm
Maximum Power Consumption 423W
0.5 mm / pixel ~ 1 mm / pixel (depending on measuring site)
Capacity 249W forearm 1.19mm / pixel
Aluminum Equivation 2.5mmAL (AL filter + X-ray tube) spine 1.62mm / pixel
femur 1.62mm / pixel
Cooling System Immersion in Insulation oil+cooling fans Detector Resolution
totalbody 51.83 mm / pixel
Tube Type Stationary Anode lateral 2.12mm / pixel
LVA 2.12 mm / pixel
Maximum Tube Voltage 120KV
APVA 2.12mm / pixel
Maximum Tube Current 25mA Accuracy of Alignment With in 1.0mm
Anode Targe Material Tungsten Detector Pixel Pitch 3.1mm
Anode Heating Curve 250W 27KJ !9min Pixel Size 900um x 2100um
Input Voltage and Frequency DC83kV Number of Channel 16 Incividual Channel
Lowest Current Time Product 1mAs (0.2mA, 5seconds) Table Top MDF, Reja skin
Dimension (W x D x H) 2784mm x 1040mm x 1250mm
Energy Splitting 41kV , 83kV
Patient weigt supported: 0 ~ 210kg
Samarium Filter 0.25mm (thickness) Patient Weight Capacity
(Max. patient weight for software : 150kg)
Anode Heat Storage Capacity 30,000 J Table Height 64cm
Maximum anode Heat content 250W Scanner Table Laser Positioning System Cross Red Laser Pointer
10 Maximum Heating Curve 650W 30kJ !1min Aluminium Equivalent for X-ray
11
ⴍ 2.0mm AL
Nominal Anode Input Power 2,000 W (at 0.1s DC) Absorbsiometry for Table

Aluminum Equivalent 0.5 mmAL Free Distance between the Arm and
440mm
Table (for lateral scan)
Maximum Useful Volltage 120 kV
Compact Table Available (2284mm x 1040mm x 1250mm: Short Body)
X-ray Tube Maximum Filament Current 4A Manufacturer SAMSUNG/HP
Nominal Focal Sspot Values
0.5mm x 0.5mm CPU ⴎ Intel Pentium Gold G5400 3.7 2400MHz 2C 54W CPU
(x-ray point dimension)
Maximum Symmetrical Radiation Field 60mm x 8mm AM ⴎ 4 GB
Tube Angle 5ⰻ HDD ⴎ 500GB
Monitor ⴎ 1366 x 768
Focal Spot Size 0.5mm x 0.5mm = 0.25mm^2
Workstation (PC) CD ROM CD / DVD R/W drive
Focal Spot to Image Receiptor Distance 662mm
Communicaiton Ethernet TCP/IP
Focal Spot to Pad Surface Distance 200mm (pad surface = table top) Graphic Intel HD Graphics Shared
Focal Spot to Table Top Distance 200mm OS ⴎ Windows 7
Focal Spot to Colimator Distance 100mm POWER 110 ~ 240 VAC , 50 / 60 Hz
Anode Angle 5ⰻ Skin Enterance Dose indication Available (uGy and uSv)
Anode-Cathode Direction Horizontal AP Spine : ⴍ7.52 uGy
Femur : ⴍ8.28 uGy
Focal Point Dimension 0.043 = Focal spot 0.5mm x Sin 5ⰻ= 0.5 x 0.0871 Patient Radiation Dose
Forearm : ⴍ2.06 uGy
Anode Capacity 42kHU Safety Total Body : ⴍ0.55 uGy
Housing Tube Thermal Capacity 271KHU = 83kV x 3mA x 780sec x 1.4 HIP < 0.341uSv (1mA)
Leakage Radiation Dose Dual Femur < 0.682uSv (1mA)
Tube Cooling Insulation oil
Spine < 0.341uSv (1mA)
Target Angle 5ⰻ Forearm < 0.173uSv (0.2mA)
Type of Collimator/Material 1st : Copper, 2nd: Lead Accessory Positioning Supporters Lateral Positioner, Lateral Positioner Cushion, Foot Guide
Collimator Height 48mm Daily QC Phantom is offered as
QC Available
acceesory
Distance from Collimator to Patient 100mm
Humidity 30% ~ 75%
Distance from Tube to Patient 200mm
External Shielding Not Required
Shutter Minimum Lead 8.07mm(AL : 6 mm, Lead 2mm, Copper 0.07mm)
Temperature 10Ⳅ~40Ⳅ
Shutter Size 30mm x 58mm x 8mm (W x D x H) Storage Temperature 5Ⳅ~50Ⳅ
X-ray Collimator
Total Filteration 4.3mm Aluminium (Al) 2.5mmAl Environmental Power Consumption 700VA
Diameter 16.5mm x 4mm Requirement Input Power 110VAC / 220VAC +/- 10%
SOD(Source to Object Distance) 200mm Shock and Vibration 700 ~ 1060hPa
SID(Source to Inspecctor Distance) 662mm Emergency function
OID(Object to Inspector Distance) 462mm (key or button on the control console to
Available initiate stop scanning)
X-ray Filter Control K-edge filter / Samarium Foil
 Ver. OT-2019-001 Ver. OT-2019-001
Component Parameter Spec. Component Parameter Spec.
AP spine Measurement and Analysis Available Multimedia Online Help Available (remote control service)
Femur Measurement and Analysis Available Superior Fracture Risk
Available (APVA)
Orthopedics Knee Measurement and Assessment (VFA)
Available
Analysis Hand for Monitoring Rheumatoid
Available (study mode for imaging diagnosis purpose)
Othopedics(Prosthesis Hip) Arthritis
Available
Measurement and Analysis Multiple Patient Directories Available
Total Body Measurement and Analysis Available Data Correction available
Regional Body Measurement and Database Conversion Available
Available
Analysis Management Tool Available
Forearm Measurement and Analysis Available Importatoin of Previous Exam for
Lateral Spine Measurement and Analysis Available Available
Individual Patient
VFA(LVA, DVA) Measurement and
Available Importation of Entire Database Available
Analysis
Combined Report & Scan Protocols Available
Whole Body Composition Available
VAT(Visceral Adipose Tissue) Available Automated QA Trending Available
Programs (S/W) Analysis for Customized Region Of
Infant Measurement and Analysis Available Available
Digital Vertebral Assessment Available Interest
Pediatric Spine, Femur, Total Body
Study Mode Available Available
Measurement
Vertebral Assessment (L4-T4) Available Small Animal Totalbody Measurement
Pediatrics Available Available
and Analysis
AFF Available Automatic Metal Detection Available
Hand Available Image Preview Available
Hip Analysis Available
Comparability of Examination Available
Morphometric Tools for Femur Available (Hip Axis Length : HAL, Hip Angle : HA)
Automatic Mean Cortical Thickness Available (manual function)
Scoliosis Available
Femoral Neck Band Available (Medial, Lateral)
Kyphosis Available
12 Colour Mapping Available Subtrochannic Band Available (Medial, Lateral) 13
Trend Analysis Trochanter Band Available (Medial, Lateral)
Available Chinese, English, French, Germany, Italian, Kazahstan, Korean,
(BMD, Body Composition, Scan Image) Multi-language
B-Scope (Body Scope) Available Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Thai, Turkish, Vietnam
FRAX Available AP Spine 160mm x 189mm
Ergonomic Scan Available Fermur 120mm x 147mm
Zone of Interest Available Total body 580mm x 1995mm
Auto ROI Available Forearm 100mm x 144mm
Angle ROI (Manual) Available Lateral Spine 140mm x 216mm
Angle Adjustment Available Infant 160mm x 160mm
Programs (S/W) Brush Function Available Study 160mm x 160mm
Edge Auto Detection Available Orthopedics 120mm x 224mm
Implant Auto Detection Available
VFA(LVA, DVA) 240mm x 420mm
Automatic Real One-Scan Available
Scan Area Forearm UD(Ultradistal), MID(mid-distal), 33%(1/3) Point
Re-Scan Available
Dual Energy Image Inspection Hip Neck, Wards, Troch, Shaft(intertrochanter), Total
Available Dual Scan: Combined examination of
(Low Energy & High Energy) Available
Compare Function Available the left and right hip
One Scan: Combined examination of the
Archive System Available Available
lumbar spine and of the left and right hip.
Data Back Up & Restore Available (With GE Data Only)
Total and Local (Head, Spine, left Rib, left Arm, left Leg, left Total,
Ver1 : Mideast, Asian, White, Black, Hispanic, Italian, Chinese, Whole Body Scan
right Rib, right Arm, right Leg, right Total, Peivis)
Australia, Korean, Sapin, European, USA_White, USA_Asian, Lateral Spine BMD Available
USA_Hispanic, USA_Black, NHANES_Asian, NHANES_Black, Available
NHANES_Hispanic, NHANES_White, Turkey_Asian, Turkey_Black, Pediatrics BMD and Z-score for AP spine and Femur, Whole Body
Reference Population
Turkey_Hispanic, Turkey_White Composition
Ver 2 : Asia, Australia, Brazil, China, Egypt, France, Finland, Modality Worklist Available
Germany, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Middle East, DICOM 3.0 Storage Class Available
Philippine, Spain, Tunisia, Turkey, USA, USA(NHANES), UK
DICOM 3.0 Worklist Available
Supported with LVA(Lateral Vertebral Assessment), Scoliosis,
Advanced Morphometric Tools DICOM 3.0 Image Format in DICOM, JPEG and TIFF Available
Kyphosis
Body Composition Available (BMI, Android / Gynoid Ratio) Send(Storage) Available
Detecting Function for Atypical Femoral Cross calibration between the new
Available Available
Fracture(AFF) system and the existing system
Exclusion of Non-Bone Region from Regirstration CE, CFDA, ANVISA, ISO13485 : 2016, ISO9001 : 2015
Available
calculation (metal, calcification, etc.) Medical Devices Registration Must submit ISO 13485 : 2003 / AC : 2007
Orthopedics with Peri-Prosthetic Bone IEC60601-1 : 2005(Medical electrical equipment - Part 1 :
Available (Orthopedics, Prosthesis Hip, Prosthesis Knee)
Density Analysis (hip prosthesis). General requirements for basic safety and essential performance)
Spine Geometry Available (Scoliosis, Kyphosis) IEC60601-1-2 : 2007(Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-2 :
Patient's trend/curve comparison process: General requirements for safety - Collateral Standard:
short-term change, long-term change, Available Electromagnetic compatibility)
Certificate
change expressed in% and% per year. General Requirements of Safety for IEC60601-1-3 : 2008(Medical electrical equipment - Part 1-3 :
Detailed colour print out of reports Available Electromagnetic Compatibility General requirements for safety - Collateral standard: General
Calcic Mass Available (BMC Available) requirements for radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray
Exposure Audio & Visual indication Available equipment)
Automatic metal detection Available IEC60601-2-28:2010(Medical electrical equipment - Part 2 :
Automated WHO Background Particular requirements for the safety of X-ray source assemblies
Available
evaluation and X-ray tube assemblies for medical diagnosis)
 LOCKING OUT APPLICATION

Locking Out Application #1 : Color Mapping Mode (RCM, BCM, OCM) Locking Out Application #2 : L (Line)-Scope

BCM L-Scope is OsteoSys’ revolutionary function to offer imaging

Absolute bone quality color mapping mode.
The reference data(T-score) for a site is divided into
6 classes and each class is represented by each color.
BCM offers pixel by pixel absolute bone quality
status of ROI.
analysis of body composition(bone, lean, fat) on arm or leg based
on tomographic technology.
L-Scope is the optimal solution for post-op treatment of
reconstruction surgery after amputation and for diagnosis and
treatment of Lymph-edema.

14 15
BMD analysis by L-Scope

RCM

Relative bone quality color mapping mode.

The min. and max. BMD values of a patient is divided
into 6 classes for a site and each class is represented
by each color. RCM offers pixel by pixel relative bone
quality status of ROI.

Fat(g) analysis by L-Scope

OCM

Osteoporotic color mapping mode. OCM offers a Lean(g) analysis by L-Scope

direct imaging diagnosis for each vertebrae
(L1, L2, L3, L4)’s osteoporotic status.
 Locking Out Application #3 : B (Body)-Scope
B-Scope is OsteoSys’ revolutionary function to offer micro analysis of body
composition(bone, lean, fat) for any ROI you choose.
B-Scope is the optimal solution for post-op treatment of liposuction surgery, diagnosis /
treatment of Lymph-edema and sarcopenia.
16
Locking Out Application #4 : FIM(Fat In Muscle)
FIM(Fat in Muscle) is a special tool for diagnosis of Sarcopenia.
Three major standards for diagnosis of Sarcopenia are muscle mass, strength,
physical performance.
Many studies prove that muscle quality should be seriously considered
for better diagnosis. Even if you have same muscle mass, the quality of
muscle decrease according to the amount of fat mass in muscle.
FIM function is OsteoSys’ exclusive application to assess muscle quality.
17
Agea 25 Age 63
 Locking Out Application #5 : Animal Mode

Spine Scan

Cyno

18
RESEARCH 19

Femur Scan

Marmoset Femur(L) Femur(R) THEME &

SALES
SEGMENTS
Cyno Femur(L) Femur(R)
 No. Sales Segment Sub-1 Sub-2 Etc.
Overview of the Main Field of Suggestion for clinical research area 1 Government Tender
Clinical Applications of with Primus 2 Hospitals Drug & Pharmcietucal &
Whole Body DXA in Adults 3 University Hospital Nutrition Compani
4 Clinic Center
Aventis (Actonel)
5 Multi-modality Center Asta Medica
Obesity Model Application / Function Possible Research Theme
Astra Draco
●

Nutritional disorders Overweight Radiology

Banyu/Teijin Pharmaceutical
●

●
Anorexia nervosa The relationship between Rehabilitation Baker Norton
BMD, Body Composition bone mineral density and Berlex Laboratories
Orthopedics
●
Chrohn’s disease Analysis(Lean Mass) body composition with Boenringe
Gastrointestinal disorders Celiac disease vertebral fragility fractures. Endoscopy
●
Bristol-Myers Squibb
●
Gastrectomy 6 Diagnosis Center Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Care International
Body Composition Analysis Sarcopenia and frailty Ob/Gyn Chugai
●
Cirrhosis (Lean Mass) guidelines update. CEPA
Hepatobiliary disorders Internal Medicine
●
Gallstones Chinoin
The relationship between DIC(Disseminated Intravascular Chugai Pharmaceutical
●
Chronic renal failure t-cell responses to Coagulopathy) Elan (HSRI)
Renal disorders Hemodialysis Body Composition Analysis cytomegalovirus(cmv) and E. Tosse
Bisphosphonate manufactures Alendronate
●

Transplantation (Lean Mass) onset of frailty in hiv- and Eisai

Primus
●

hiv+ men in the multicenter Risedronate Eli Lilly (Evista)

●
Hypopituitarism aids cohort study. Ibandronate Ferrer
Endocrinological disorders Acromegal Genentech
●
HRT manufactures
●
Cushing’s syndromey The effects a multimodal 7 Pharmaceutical Market Glaxo Pharmaceuticals
intervention in older frail / SERM/Raloxifene manufactures Hoechst Roussel
Body Composition Analysis ICN-Iberica
Osteoporosis pre-frail people with diabetes Calcitonin manufactures
20
●
(Lean Mass) ISS Corporation 21
Bone disorders Paget’s disease mellitus from a functional
●
Parathyroid hormone manufactures Kissei, Sankyo
●
Osteopetrosis perspective.
Denosumab manufactures Kureha/Sankyo
Phase 1 Clinical Trial for Kissei Pharmaceutical
COPD Calcium
Body Composition Analysis Anti-Sarcopenia /
●

Pulmonary diseases Leiras

●
Fibrosis cystic for animal(Bone Mass, 8 Nutrition Manufactures Vitamin D Marion Merrell Dow, Inc.
Anti-Osteoporosis/
Fat Mass, Lean Mass) Anti-Obesity Medication. Mineral Mead Johnson
●
Corticosteroids Meiji Confectionary
Drugs and substances ●
Hormones Calcium Milk Milo calcium milk Merck Sharp & Dohme
●
Parenteral nutrition 9 Milk Industries Vitamin D Milk Miles Laboratories
Baby Milk Powder MSD (Fosamax)
●
Diabetes Novartis Pharmaceuticals
●
AIDS 10 Distribution Enterprise Amway Novartis (Estraderm,
●
Sympathetic dystrophy 11 Drug Stores Calcitonines)
syndrome Novo Nordisk
Test lab
Other disorders ●
Amiotrophic lateral 12 Laboratories Organon (oestrogens, Livial)
sclerosis Food industries Organon
●
Tetraplegy All kind of Education Center Pfizer
●
Duchenne muscular 13 Education & Research institute Pfizer Labs
R&D department Parke-Davis
dystrophy
14 Health Services Procter & Gamble (Didronel)
Roche (Didronel)
15 Elderly Facility
Roger Bellon
16 Nursing Home Rh?ne Poulenc Rorer
17 Sportsman care Center Body care Center Schering-Plough
Schering A.G.
18 Acute care Center Serono Laboratories
19 Long term care Center Shire
20 Family Practitioner GP SmithKline Beecham
Solvay Pharmaceuticals
Golf Sterling Winthrop
Luxury Spa Sankyo
21 VVIP service & treatment Sumitomo
Fines center
Syntex Laboratories
(Body measurement service)
Sanofi Winthrop
International Relief KOICA Schering (oestrogens)
22 Servier
Organization JAICA
Takeda Pharmaceutical
Banking and Mutual Funds TAP Pharmaceuticals
23 Funds
Any Leasing Teijin
TEVA
Railways Service
UpjohnWyeth Ayerst
24 Transport station Road Transport Service Yamanouchi
Airport sevice Zeneca
25 Etc. Etc. Etc.
 01. Spine

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1980-06-06 (38.6) Height 165.0 cm

Patient Name Patient Gender Female Weight 55.0 kg

Menopause No Ethnicity NHANES_WHITE Date Measured 2017-08-23

Overview of measurement result Consideration Factors

[ ] I have a previous fracture history

Spine [ ] Parents have a hip fracture history

Region T-Score Z-Score BMD (g/

༆) BMC (g) Area (༆) [ ] Currently I am smoking

L1-L4 -1.3 -1.3 1.032 62.39 60.48

[ ] Currently in use of steroid medication

[ ] Currently suffering from rheumatoid arthritis

[ ] Currently having secondary osteoporsis

[ ] Drink at least three glasses of alcohol a day

[ ] There is previously measured BMD value of femur

SAMPLE
Analysis of Lumber spine
Region BMD (g/ ⽊ ) T-Score Z-Score BMC (g) Area (⽊) Regional density value curve(g/c⽋)

L1 0.878 -2.2(78%) -2.2(78%) 13.11 14.93 1.70

L2 1.030 -1.5(86%) -1.5(86%) 15.37 14.91 L1
1.48
22 L3 1.098 -0.9(91%) -0.9(91%) 16.18 14.74 23
L2

REPORT
1.26
L4 1.116 -0.7(93%) -0.7(93%) 17.73 15.89

L1-L2 0.954 -1.8(82%) -1.8(82%) 28.48 29.84 1.04

L3
L1-L3 1.002 -1.5(85%) -1.5(85%) 44.65 44.58 0.82

L1-L4 1.032 -1.3(87%) -1.3(87%) 62.39 60.48 L4 0.60

L2-L3 1.064 -1.2(88%) -1.2(88%) 31.55 29.65
0.38
L2-L4 1.082 -1.0(90%) -1.0(90%) 49.28 45.55 L1 L2 L3 L4

L3-L4 1.107 -0.8(92%) -0.8(92%) 33.91 30.63 Image not for diagnosis Reference curve Region of Interest

T-Score & Z-Score Prediction of future fracture

BMD (g/⽊) Reference : L1-L4 T-Score Relative comparision with same age group
1.42 2 This is a prediction of the probablility of fracture within 10
years of the risk factor check list.
1.30 1 Good Standard Bad

1.18 0 86% *When BMD value of Femur is input

Normal Major osteoporotic fracture probability -
1.07 -1
Display current bone status of examinee Probability of Hip Fracture -
0.95 -2
Osteopenia When BMD value of Femur is not input
0.83 -3 Major osteoporotic fracture probability -
Probability of Hip Fracture -
0.71 -4 Normal Osteopenia Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis *BMI -
0.60 -5
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Me
Age(years)
Index of treatment boundary
45
Follow up examnination
40
165.0 Comparision between current and
Height (cm)
previous BMD value 35

55.0 3.00 30
Weight (kg)
25
20 Fracture
over 20% Treatment
BMI (kg/༇) probability %
20
0.33
1.032 15
BMD (g/c༇)
10
-1.3
T-Score -2.33
5 over 3% Treatment

-1.3
Z-Score 0
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
-5.00 Age
Hip Main part
ScanDate 17.08.23 17.08.23

Doctor's comment Doctor's information

Operating department
Osteosys

Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Dr.Demo

Version: 1.2.1 MN: 121.01.29 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS

Radiation dose > 7.52μGy
 02. Femur(Dual) 03. Lateral Spine

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1980-06-06 (38.6) Height 165.0 cm

Patient Name Patient Gender Female Weight 55.0 kg

Menopause No Ethnicity NHANES_WHITE Date Measured 2017-08-23

PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Overview of measurement result Consideration Factors Patient Information

[ ] I have a previous fracture history PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Right Femur
[ ] Parents have a hip fracture history
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN
Region T-Score Z-Score BMD (g/ ⽊) BMC (g) Area (⽊) BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale
[ ] Currently I am smoking
Neck 1.1 1.6 1.206 7.71 6.40 Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 kg
Total 1.0 1.3 1.146 31.08 27.13 [ ] Currently in use of steroid medication
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No
[ ] Currently suffering from rheumatoid arthritis
Left Femur
[ ] Currently having secondary osteoporsis LTSpine
Region T-Score Z-Score BMD (g/ ⽊) BMC (g) Area (⽊)
[ ] Drink at least three glasses of alcohol a day PM_L-TS-pi
BMD (g/⽊) Reference : L2-L3 T-Score
Neck -1.2 -0.7 0.893 5.80 6.49
1.04 Over 4
Total -0.2 0.0 0.988 39.09 39.57 [̻] There is previously measured BMD value of femur
0.93 3

0.82 2
Analysis of both sides Femur
0.71 1

0.60 0
L2
Normal
0.49 -1

24 0.38
Osteopenia
-2 25
0.27 -3

0.17 -4
L3 0.06
Osteoporosis
-5
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

R ight Femur Image not for diagnosis Image not for diagnosis Left F emur Region BMD (g/⽊) T-Score Z-Score BMC (g Area ( ⽊)

T-Score & Z-Score Prediction of future fracture L4 L2 1.084 4.4 (180%) 4.4 (180%) 11.68 10.77

Region BMD (g/⽊) T-Score Z-Score

BMD (g/cm2) Reference : Neck T-Score L3 0.965 3.3 (161%) 3.3 (161%) 6.67 6.91
1.33 2 Neck Right 1.206 1.1(114%) 1.6(122%) This is a prediction of the probablility of fracture within 10
years of the risk factor check list.

1.20 1 Neck Left 0.893 -1.2(84%) -0.7(90%) L4 0.814 1.4 (123%) 1.4 (123%) 6.29 7.72
Right Femur
Neck Mean 1.050 -0.1(99%) 0.4(106%)
1.06 0 *When BMD value of Femur is input L2-L3 1.038 4.0 (173%) 4.0 (173%) 18.34 17.68
Normal Neck Diff. 0.313 Under... Under... Major osteoporotic fracture probability -
0.93 -1
Total Right 1.146 1.0(113%) 1.3(116%) Probability of Hip Fracture -
Left Femur L2-L4 0.970 - - 24.63 25.40
0.79 Osteopenia -2
Total Left 0.988 -0.2(97%) 0.0(100%) When BMD value of Femur is not input
- L3-L4 0.885 2.4 (141%) 2.4 (141%) 12.95 14.63
0.65 -3 Total Mean 1.067 0.4(105%) 0.7(108%) Major osteoporotic fracture probability
Image not for diagnosis
Probability of Hip Fracture -
0.52 -4 Total Diff. 0.158 Under... -6.7(16%)
Osteoporosis *BMI -
0.38 -5

Index of treatment boundary Comment

45
Follow up examnination
40
Right Femur Left Femur
35
165.0 165.0 165.0
Height (cm) Height (cm) 30

55.0 55.0 55.0 25

Weight (kg) Weight (kg) Fracture
probability % over 20% Treatment
20
20 20 20
BMI (kg/⽋) BMI (kg/⽋) 15

1.236
1.206 10
BMD (g/c⽋) BMD (g/c⽋) 0.893
over 3% Treatment
2.2 5
2.0
T-Score T-Score -0.4 0
ASIAN, Reference Population.
2.5 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO)
2.3 Age - Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal.
Z-Score Z-Score -0.1 Hip Main part
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
ScanDate 17.08.23 ScanDate 17.08.23 17.08.23
Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5
Doctor's comment Doctor's information
Operating department
Osteosys

Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Dr.Demo
Version: 1.2.1 MN: 121.01.29 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS
 04. Forearm 05. LVA

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1980-06-06 (38.6) Height 165.0 cm

Patient Name Patient Gender Female Weight 55.0 kg

Menopause No Ethnicity NHANES_WHITE Date Measured 2017-08-23 PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Overview of measurement result Consideration Factors Patient Information

[ ] I have a previous fracture history PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Left Forearm [ ] Parents have a hip fracture history Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity...............NHANES_WHITE
Region T-Score Z-Score BMD (g/
༆) BMC (g) Area (༆) [ ] Currently I am smoking
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale
Radius Total 1.4 1.4 0.617 2.61 4.23 Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 kg
[ ] Currently in use of steroid medication
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No
[ ] Currently suffering from rheumatoid arthritis

[ ] Currently having secondary osteoporsis LVA

[ ] Drink at least three glasses of alcohol a day PM_L-VA-2.
Cobb Angle Region : T5-L1 Angle : 28.57
[ ] There is previously measured BMD value of femur Region Posterior Middle Anterior
T4 2.602 1.835 1.675
T5 1.979 2.432 1.979
Analysis of Forearm T4
T6 2.138 2.432 1.827
T5
Region BMD (g/⽊) T-Score Z-Score BMC (g) Area (⽊) T5 T7 3.249 2.592 1.672
Ulna UD Radius UD BMD comparision between UD and 33%
Radius UD 0.449 2.1(119%) 2.1(119%) 1.10 2.45 T6 T8 2.595 2.738 2.595
Ulna UD 0.438 - - 0.12 0.27 T9 2.952 2.562 3.145
T7
26 Radius 33% 0.850 2.0(119%) 2.0(119%) 1.51 1.77
T10 2.916 2.679 2.562 27
Ulna 33% 0.783 - - 1.39 1.77 Ulna 33% Radius 33% T8 T11 2.991 2.672 2.632
Radius 33%+Ulna 33% : 1.6
T12 3.531 3.131 2.493
Both UD 0.448 - - - - T9
L1 3.093 3.556 2.535
Both 33% 0.816 - - - - T10 L2 3.638 3.785 3.033
Radius UD+Ulna UD : 0.9
Radius Total 0.617 1.4(112%) 1.4(112%) 2.61 4.23 T11 L3 3.833 3.716 3.865
Ulna Total 0.737 - - 1.51 2.05 L4 3.654 3.670 3.848
T12
Both Total 0.656 - - - -
Region Mean Ht.(cm) M/P Ratio(%) A/P Ratio(%)
Image not for diagnosis L1 L1 T4 2.037 70.537 64.385
T5 2.130 122.917 100.000
T-Score & Z-Score Prediction of future fracture L2
T6 2.132 113.778 85.463
T7 2.504 79.782 51.468
BMD (g/⽊
Reference : Radius Total T-Score Relative comparision with same age group
0.64 2 This is a prediction of the probablility of fracture within 10 L3 T8 2.643 105.508 100.000
years of the risk factor check list.
Good Standard Bad
T9 2.886 86.796 106.547
0.60 1
L4 T10 2.719 91.853 87.858
0.55 0 21% *When BMD value of Femur is input T11 2.765 89.348 88.006
Normal Major osteoporotic fracture probability - T12 3.052 88.653 70.582
0.50 -1
Display current bone status of examinee Probability of Hip Fracture - L1 3.061 114.953 81.949
0.46 -2 L2 3.485 104.021 83.366
Osteopenia When BMD value of Femur is not input
L3 3.805 96.928 100.824
0.41 -3 Major osteoporotic fracture probability -
Image not for diagnosis L4 3.724 100.455 105.314
Probability of Hip Fracture -
0.36 -4 Normal Osteopenia Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis *BMI -
0.31 -5
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Me
Age(years)
Index of treatment boundary Comment
45
Follow up examnination
40
165.0 Comparision between current and
Height (cm)
previous BMD value 35

55.0 3.00 30
Weight (kg)
25
20 Fracture
over 20% Treatment
BMI (kg/༇) probability %
20
0.33
0.617 15
BMD (g/c༇)
10
1.4
T-Score -2.33
5 over 3% Treatment

1.4 NHANES_WHITE, Reference Population.

Z-Score 0
40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO)
-5.00
17.08.23
Hip Main part Age - Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal.
ScanDate 17.08.23
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Doctor's comment Doctor's information Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5
Operating department
Osteosys

Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Dr.Demo

Version: 1.2.1 MN: 121.01.29 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS

Radiation dose > 2.06μGy
 06. Orthopedic 07-1. Total Body

PrintDate : 2019-01-28 PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information Patient Information

PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity...............NHANES_WHITE Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender......................................Male
Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 k g Height................................180.0 cm Weight................................120.0 kg
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No Fragility Fractures........................No

Left Orthopedic TotalBody

PM_L-Or-th
PM_T-B_-VA
1.581 Zone1 BMD

1.461 BMD (g/༆) Reference : Total T-Score

1.50 Over 4
1.42 3
1 1.341
2017-08-23 1.34 2
7 1.221
1.26 1
1.101 1.18 0
28 1.10
Normal
-1 29
2 0.981
6 1.02 Osteopenia -2
0.861 0.94 -3
0.86 -4
Osteoporosis
0.78 -5
5 3 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Region BMD (g/⽊) BMC (g) Area (⽊)

Zone1 1.323 4.79 3.6

4 Zone2 1.597 3.67 2.3

Region BMD (g/⽊ ) T-Score Z-Score BMC (g) Area (⽊
)
Zone3 1.083 5.13 4.7
Head 2.215 - - 637.46 287.84
Zone4 1.084 5.25 4.8 Spine 1.990 - - 552.78 277.83
L-Rib 1.150 - - 330.12 286.97
Zone5 1.354 3.56 2.6 L-Arm 1.114 - - 96.56 86.66
Zone6 1.133 4.89 4.3 L-Leg 1.437 - - 590.77 411.08
L-Total 1.539 - - 1915.05 1244.56
Zone7 0.939 5.92 6.3 R-Rib 1.118 - - 310.25 277.39
R-Arm 1.177 - - 82.02 69.67
OuterTotal 1.275 13.59 10.7
R-Leg 1.433 - - 592.91 413.69
InnerTotal 1.085 14.36 13.2 R-Total 1.542 - - 1882.78 1220.61
Image not for diagnosis Pelvis 1.705 - - 604.96 354.90
Total 1.540 4.5 (131%) 4.6 (132%) 3797.83 2466.03

Image not for diagnosis

Comment
Comment

NHANES_WHITE, Reference Population. ASIAN, Reference Population.

According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO) According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO)
- Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal. - Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal.
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia. - Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis. - Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
Normal : T ≥ -1.0 Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5 Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5 Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5

Radiation dose > 0.55μGy

 07-2. Total Body 07-3. Total Body

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1980-06-06 (38.6) Height 180.0 cm

Patient Name Patient Gender Male Weight 120.0 kg

PrintDate : 2019-01-28 Ethnicity ASIAN Date Measured 2017-08-23

Patient Information
Total Body Site Analysis
PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo 1. Total Body Scan Image 2. Total Body Composition (kg)
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN Value Soft Tissue Body Weight
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender......................................Male
Total Lean Mass 59.4
Height................................180.0 cm Weight................................120.0 k g 113.1
Total Fat Mass 53.7 116.9
Fragility Fractures........................No
Total Bone Mass 3.8
TotalBody
PM_T-B_-VA 3. Body Fat Analysis
BMI PBF(F/W)*100 47.5
VAT Mass (g) 1849
Under Weight Normal Over Weight Obese - 1 Obese - 2
VAT Volume ( ໼ ) 2010
VAT Area (༆) 372
1 2 3 4 5
5 VAT (%) / SAT (%) 34 / 26

30 18.5 25.0 30.0 35.0 31

4. Body Lean Analysis
Total Body BMI : 37.0
Lean Body Mass 59.4
VAT Area ( ⽊) = 372 / VAT Volume (໼ ) = 2010 / VAT Mass (g) = 1849
APPen Lean/Height^2 7.9
VAT (%) = 34 / SAT (%) = 26
APPen Lean/Weight 0.2

APPen Lean/BMI 0.7

Region Fat (g) Lean (g) TISSUE (g) BMC (g) Total (g) BMC(%) TissueFAT(%) TotalFAT(%)
Head 2277 4383 6660 637 7298 8.7 34.2 31.2
5. BMI
L-Arm 1705 1795 3500 97 3596 2.7 48.7 47.4
BMI : 37.0%
L-Trunk 14758 14911 29669 909 30578 3.0 49.7 48.3
Under Weight Normal Over Weight Obese - 1 Obese - 2
L-Leg 9385 11175 20560 591 21151 2.8 45.6 44.4
L-Total 26987 30073 57059 1915 58974 3.2 47.3 45.8 1 2 3 4 5
R-Arm 1520 1607 3128 82 3210 2.6 48.6 47.4 18.5 25.0 30.0 35.0
Image not for diagnosis
R-Trunk 14412 14445 28857 889 29746 3.0 49.9 48.4
R-Leg 9624 11118 20742 593 21335 2.8 46.4 45.1
R-Total 26695 29362 56057 1883 57940 3.2 47.6 46.1
Total 53682 59435 113116 3798 116914 3.2 47.5 45.9
6. Body Map 7. Trend
Android 5891 3891 9782 138 9920 1.4 60.2 59.4
Gynoid 8636 8501 17137 373 17510 2.1 50.4 49.3 Obesity
Appen.LM Lean(g) 25694.7

Image not for diagnosis Appen.LM Fat(g) 22234.6

Comment A/G Ratio 0.5

BF
(25%) Weight changes 116.9

ScanDate 17.08.23

BF : Body Fat
ASIAN, Reference Population. A : AWGS, Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia
I : IWGS, International Working Group for Sarcopenia
According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO) E : EWGS, European Working Group for Sarcopenia
- Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal. Normal A I E Muscle weekness
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5 Doctor's comment Doctor's information
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5
Operating department
Osteosys

Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Dr.Demo

Version: 1.2.1 MN: 121.01.29 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS

Radiation dose > 0.55μGy
 08. Study 09. FIM Study

PrintDate : 2019-01-28 PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information Patient Information

PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale
Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 k g Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 kg
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No

Study FIM Study

PM_S-tu-dy 1.620 Zone 1 BMD PM_F-IM-_F 2.378 Zone 1 BMD

1.500 2.258

1.380 2.138

2017-08-23 2017-08-23
1.260 2.018

1.140 1.898
32 Z1
33
Z7
1.020 1.778

0.900 1.658
Z2 Z6

Z3 Z5 Z1
Region BMD(g/⽊) BMC(g) Area(⽊) Fat(g) Lean(g) Total(g) FAT(%) Region BMD(g/⽊) BMC(g) Area(⽊) Fat(g) Lean(g) Total(g) FAT(%)

Zone 1 1.260 4.926 3.910 23.407 114.732 143.064 16.806 Zone 1 2.018 28.340 14.045 857.405 1117.860 2003.604 46.777
Z4
Zone 2 0.998 0.473 0.474 37.150 182.898 220.521 16.721 Zone 2 - - - - - - -

Zone 3 - - - 44.234 182.823 227.057 19.353 Z3 Zone 3 1.742 26.120 14.992 548.026 827.026 1401.173 43.203

Zone 4 2.357 23.690 10.050 71.199 322.452 417.341 18.177 Zone 4 - - - - - - -

Zone 5 2.167 20.625 9.519 17.388 83.287 121.300 17.339 Zone 5 - - - - - - -

Zone 6 1.637 19.659 12.013 17.192 71.464 108.316 19.502 Zone 6 - - - - - - -

Image not for diagnosis Image not for diagnosis
Zone 7 0.929 5.877 6.323 35.518 37.806 79.201 49.675 Zone 7 - - - - - - -

Comment Comment
 10. APVA 11. Infant Total body

PrintDate : 2019-01-28 PrintDate : 2019-01-28

Patient Information Patient Information

PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo PatientID.........................................1 Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity.................................ASIAN Name.....................................Patient Ethnicity................................WHITE
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6) Gender.................................F emale BirthDate...............2017-06-06 (1.6) Gender.................................F emale
Height................................165.0 cm Weight..................................55.0 k g Height..................................76.0 cm Weight..................................10.2 kg
Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No Menopause..................................No F ragility F ractures........................No

APVA Infant TotalBody

PM_A-PV-A. PM_I-nf-an Head BMD
Cobb Angle Region : T4-T7 Angle : 11.60

T4 T4
T5

34 T7
35
T7

Region BMD (g/⽊) T-Score Z-Score BMC (g) Area (⽊)

Head - - - - -
Spine 0.378 - - 9.29 24.56
L-Rib 0.023 - - 0.01 0.34
L-Arm - - - - -
L-Leg 1.426 - - 8.50 5.96
L-Trunk 0.356 - - 4.79 13.46
L-Total 1.185 - - 29.17 24.61
R-Rib - - - - -
R-Arm - - - - -
R-Leg 1.406 - - 3.48 2.48
R-Trunk 0.392 - - 4.50 11.48
R-Total 1.141 - - 28.08 24.61
Image not for diagnosis Image not for diagnosis

Comment Comment

ASIAN, Reference Population.

According to the publication of the World Health Organization(WHO)
- Normal : A BMD result not more than 1SD below the young adult mean(T ≥ -1.0) is considered normal.
- Osteopenia : A BMD result that lies between 1.0 and 2.5SD below the young adult mean(-1.0 > T > -2.5) indicates osteopenia.
- Osteoporosis : A BMD result more than 2.5SD below the young adult mean(T ≤ -2.5) is classified as osteoporosis.
Normal : T ≥ -1.0
Osteopenia : -1.0 > T > -2.5
Osteoporosis : T ≤ -2.5
 12. Knee 13. VAT

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1966-06-06 (52.5) Height 166.0 cm
Patient Name Patient Gender Female Weight 66.0 kg
PrintDate : 2019-01-28 Ethnicity TURKEY_WHITE Date Measured2017-08-23

Patient Information
PatientID.........................................1
Name.....................................Patient
BirthDate.............1980-06-06 (38.6)
Height................................165.0 cm
Menopause..................................No
Knee
PM_K-ne-e.
VAT Analysis
Doctor................................Dr.Demo
Ethnicity................................WHITE
Gender.................................F emale
Weight..................................65.0 k g
F ragility F ractures........................No
1.247 Zone 1 BMD
1. VAT(Visceral Adiopose Tissue) / Visceral Fat
VAT Scan estimates the VAT (Visceral Adipose Tissue)
content within the android region, VAT is a specific type
of fat that is associated with several types of metabolic
diseases such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type
2 diabetes. CoreScan results have been validated for
adults between ages 18-90, and with a BMI in the range
of 18.5-40
Visceral Fat(VAT)

1.127

1.007
2. Body Fat Analysis
2017-08-23
0.887 PBF(F/W)*100 47.1
VAT Mass (g) 1541
0.767
36 38 VAT Volume ( ⽎ ) 1675 37
Z3 Z5 0.647 Approx. VAT Area (༆) 310
VAT (%) / SAT (%) 29 / 31
0.527
Z1 Z2

Subcutaneous Fat 3. VAT Trend History

Region BMD (g/⽊) BMC (g) Area (⽊) PBF(F/W)*100 47.1
Z4
Zone 1 0.887 4.391 4.953
VAT Mass (g) 1541.4
Zone 2 1.349 6.324 4.688
Z6 Z7
VAT Volume (⽎) 1675.5
Zone 3 0.657 4.299 6.548
Approx.VAT Area(⽊) 309.9
Zone 4 0.739 8.037 10.881

Zone 5 1.499 10.292 6.866 ScanDate 17.08.23

Image not for diagnosis Zone 6 0.615 2.784 4.527 4. Trend

Zone 7 0.598 4.159 6.958 Appen Lean Mass(g) 29404.8

Appen Fat Mass(g) 30770.6

Comment
A/G Ratio 0.5
.

Weight changes 118.6

ScanDate 17.08.23

Doctor's comment Doctor's information

Operating department
Osteosys
Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Demo

Version: 1.2.0 MN: 120.11.10 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS

 14. AFF

Measurement Results
PatientID 1 BirthDate 1980-06-06 (38.6) Height 165.0 cm

Patient Name Patient Gender Female Weight 65.0 kg

Menopause No Ethnicity WHITE Date Measured 2017-08-23

Analysis of AFF
1. AFF(Atypical Femoral Fracture) 2. AFF Location & Width(mm)

38
Region
Line 1
Line 2
Line 3
Location (mm)
303
326
155
Width (mm)
7.9
7.8
6.7
ROOM 39

LAYOUT
Line 4 230 6.6
Line 5 172 7.2
Line 6 209 6.9
Line 7 256 6.9

3. Width Trend (Max)

Width (mm) 7.92

ScanDate 17-08-23

Image not for diagnosis

4. Trend

Doctor's comment Doctor's information

. Operating department
Osteosys

Reference Doctor Name

Doctor Name
Dr.Demo

NHANES(2005-2008), Reference Population / Version: 1.2.1 MN: 121.01.29 PRIMUS / OSTEOSYS

 Room Layout for DXA Installation

PRIMUS

40
3000

2790

150 1050 1000

3000
CONTACT INFO

SEOUL OFFICE
Address: 9F, 903 JNK DIGITAL TOWER, 111 DIGITAL-RO 26, GURO-GU, SEOUL, KOREA
Phone : +82 2 6124 5900
E-mail : info@osteosys.com
Homepage : www.osteosys.com
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/worldtopbmd/