Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This experimental study was undertaken with the aim of examining the flexural behaviour of a skew slab bridge deck with particular
regard to the obtuse corners and the boundaries of the structure. The investigation considered bending and twisting moments, and
reactive and shearing forces under concentrated point loads.
Tests were carried out on a simply supported asbestos-cement slab, with a 45" skew angle. Experimental results are compared with
finite element solutions.
I
9.5 mm Table 1. Results of material tests
18.8 mm
\ \
A
B
y’
.Y’
4 0 1~8 . 9 ~ 4 0 0 26.46
4 0 x 1 8 . 9 ~ 4 0 0 24.98
0.209
0.198
25,72 0.20
I
load cells; the output was recorded on paper tape and
processed by computer.
(3)
(4)
In equations (3) and (4) the shear forces are expressed
as a function of the gradients of the bending and twisting
moments. Therefore, to use these equations, it is
necessary to know the variations of M,, M y and M , in
Fig. 1. Dimensions of model and coordinates adopted
the orthogonal directions x and y at a reference station.
By placing rosettes at the points A, B and C shown in
Because the primary area of interest in the tests was Fig. 2, the bending and twisting moments at these points
bridge slabs, two support conditions were employed.
The first consisted of a 12.7 mm diameter roller at one
abutment, and eight discrete point supports provided by
load cells at the other. Both support lines were restrained
against uplift of the slab. For the second support
condition the discrete supports were replaced by a
continuous knife edge. Additional tests were also
performed without vertical restraint against uplift, i.e.,
the plate was allowed to displace upwards at the
supports.
To determine the elastic properties of this material,
two beam specimens were cut from the same sheet as the
model. One of the beams was cut parallel to the shortest
side of the model (Beam A ) and the other perpendicular
to it (Beam B). Average results obtained from tests are
summarized in Table 1 ; analytical checks showed that
the material could be considered as virtually isotropic
and the elastic constants used were the mean values
shown in Table 1. Fig. 2. Position of strain gauges for shear force measurement
Fig. 3. Bending moment M, along section A due to 492 N load at points, 1, 5, and 9
can be calculated approximately from the strain the shear forces at the point A may be expressed as first
measurements. The points B and C are located along the differences :
x and y axes, respectively, and the point A coincides with
MBx - - MCxy- MAxy
the intersection of both axes. For the purpose of QA,= Ax (5)
simplification, the bending and twisting moments read at AY
point A, are represented as MA,, MA,, and MAxy;the and
corresponding values at B are MB,, etc; and at C, M,,,
etc. MCy- - MBxy- MAxy
(6)
Introducing these expressions in equations (3) and (4) QAY= Ay Ax
JOURNAL OF STRAIN ANALYSIS VOL 15 N O 2 1980 (l’ IMechE 1980 105
4 RESULTS
The distribution of transverse moment, M y , along support line, in most of the cases these values are still
transverse section K, 6 mm from the support line, is quite high, especially for the case in which the load was
shown in Fig. 5 . The reversal of sign of M y can be seen as placed at point 1. The stress gradient at the obtuse
the load is transferred from point 1 to point 9 on the corner and near the free edge is shown to be very steep.
model. Maximum values of the twisting moment M , , Because of the Kirchhoff boundary conditions
were found at points near to the free edges and towards (equation (2)) used to satisfy the plate equation, the
the obtuse corner of the plate (Figs 6 and 7). Although analytical values do not satisfy the true boundary
the experimental values of twisting moment tend to condition of M1, = 0 at free edges.
decrease at a short distance from the free edge and the The distributions of bending moments M , and M y and
Support line
o Experimental
results
Program
PSALM
1 5 6 6m m 4
Fig. 6. Twisting moment M,, along section A due to 492 N load at points 1, 5, and 9
JOURNAL OF STRAIN ANALYSIS VOL IS N O 2 1980 0 IMechE 1980 107
the twisting moment M , , for the model with two line in which (1) the plate was restrained against uplift along
supports are also given in Figs 4, 5 , and 7, respectively. the support line, and (2) the plate was left free to displace
On comparing the results for the line support with those upwards (i.e., to lift off the support).
for discrete point supports, it can be seen that the Figures 9 to 11 present the experimental and analytical
moments at the obtuse corner increase in absolute value distributions of shear force for three of the load cases and
when the line support is used. the plate under discrete and line support conditions. It
can be seen that the experimental results for the shear
force Q, compare reasonably well with the theoretical
4.3 Reactive forces
ones for both support conditions. In the case of the shear
The experimental reactive forces for three load cases are force Qy,the agreement between the values is not so
summarized in Fig. 8 and compared with finite element close, especially at the obtuse corner where the analytical
values. Special attention was paid to evaluation of the values are consistently higher than the test results. For
stiffnesses of the load cells, which have a considerable the case in which the plate was left free over the line
effect upon the magnitude and distribution of the supports, the values of the shear forces Q, and Q, at the
reactions at the obtuse corner. The elasticity of the obtuse corner are larger than the theoretical results and
bearings, apart from the position of the load, is a factor larger than the case where the slab is restrained from
which profoundly affects the relative magnitudes of the lifting. The corresponding local deformations of the plate
reactions at the supports. were also larger, as monitored by a dial gauge.
The distribution of transverse shear forces along a For solutions based on the fourth order plate equation,
section 6 mm from the support line was obtained the static shear force is approximately equal to the sums
experimentally and compared with finite element values. of direct shear forces and the edge forces. The latter have
The distribution of transverse forces is given for the been defined as concentrated forces of magnitude equal
two support conditions, i.e., eight discrete support points to the twisting moments at the edges of the plate.
and a continuous knife edge. The latter includes the cases In Fig. 7 it was seen that the experimental twisting
moment M,,, near the free edge, at the obtuse corner, is
smaller than the theoretical value, but that it still
represents a large value. For the value to become zero, in
Suomn line, I a distance of 6 mm to the edge, means that the gradient
Diwrete p i n t supporlr
-- -Program PSALM of the twisting moment has to be large. This large value
0 Eipenmcnlal of the gradient of M,, in the y direction has a direct
Knile-edge s u p p r l influence on the value of the shear force Q, as given by
Program PSALM equation (3), and confirms the existence of a large shear
o Experimental force distributed over a very short distance near the edge
of the plate.
Figure 12 represents the values of the shear force Q,,
along a line 6 mm from the support, obtained from
resolving Q, and Q, for the model with line supports and
restrained from uplift. Each figure shows the distribution
of Q, for a different position of the load along the mid-
span. The values obtained at the 9 points along the
section K are joined by lines giving a general idea of the
distribution of the shear forces. By applying Simpson’s
rule the integral of shear force is obtained. This value is
c
given in each figure as Q,. The percentage of this force
in terms of the static shear force is also shown. It was
found that for those load cases which produced low
values of twisting moment (Fig. 12(c)),the summation of
shear forces Q, agreed well with the total static shear.
The apparently poorer accuracy in the other load cases is
due mainly to the factor which has been already
discussed, in relation to the gradient of the twisting
moment M , , near the edge of the plate. When the values
of twisting moment measured near the edges of the plate
are added to the direction shear Q,, the results are much
improved. The deviation of these values in terms of the
total static shear is also given in Fig. 12(a), (b), and (c).
6 CONCLUSIONS
Fig. 7. Twisting moment M,, along section K due to 492 N load at (1) An approximate experimental method to obtain the
points 1, 5, and 9 shear forces in a plate model based on the gradients of
108 JOURNAL OF STRAIN ANALYSIS VOL 15 NO 2 1980 P IMechE 1980
3 50
300
250
200
-0- Experimental
150
100
50
- 50
150
I00
50
- 50
150
100
50
- 50
the moments, has been introduced. Although the within a very short distance of the edge. This large shear
experimental determination of shear forces was carried force originates from steep gradients of moments
out along a section close to the support line (where the confirmed by test results.
stresses experience rapid changes), the technique proved (3) Test results show that when a skew slab is
to be effective in most load cases and for both support supported on bearings, their elastic deformation has a
conditions used in the experiment. considerable effect upon the behaviour of the skew plate.
(2) The corner and edge forces introduced by the The bearings having most effect are those placed at the
Kirchhoff boundary condition are physically significant, obtuse corner. Elastic bearings lead to a more even
in that although there is no actual concentrated force at distribution of reactive forces than a rigid support
the edge of the plate, a large shear force is distributed condition.
JOURNAL OF STRAIN ANALYSIS VOL 15 NO 2 1980 ?I IMechE 1980 109
5.0 5.0
4.0 4.0
3.0 3.0
2.0 2.0
1.o 1 .0
E o 0
3 -1.0 E
E -1.0
6.0 z' 6.0
5.0 5.0
4.0 4.0
3.0 3.0
2.0 2.0
1 .o 1 .o
0 0'
- 1.0 - 1.0
Fig. 9. Distribution of shear forces 0,and 0,along section K due to Fig. 11. Distribution of shear forces 0,and 0, along section K due
a concentrated load at point 1 to a concentrated load at point 5
566mm
Dtrretc point supports
---Program PSALM 5.0.
o Experimental
Kndc-cdgc support
-Program
o
A
PSALM
Experimental-no uplift
Experimental-free to uplift
Support h e
4.0-i
1 .o
{-
*;: Edge forces
!=0.5-
- 1 .o +
Total shear force = 157.7 87.5 0.5 = 245.7 N +
Deviation-= 0.1 per cent
4.oi
(a)
MC= 0.8
Edge forces
- +
Total shear force = 164.0 61.5 0.8 = 226.3 N +
Deviation =
__8.0 per cent
(b)
4.0-
MC = 5.0
Edge forces
+
Total shear force = 243.1 5.0 0.1 = 248.2 N +
Deviation =- 0.9 per cent
(c)
Fig. 10. Distribution of shear forces 0,and 0, along section K due Fig. 12. Distribution fo shear force 0. along section K due to
to a concentrated load at point 3 concentrated loads at (a) point 1, (b) point 3, and (c) point 7
(4) Large reversals in the values of bending moments (3) KENNEDY, J. B. and MARTENS, I. C. ‘Stresses near corners of skewed
stiffened plates’, The Structural Engineer 1963 41, 345-346.
occurred mainly in the obtuse corner regions of the skew (4) KENNEDY, J. B. and TAMBERG, K. C. Problems of skew in concrete
plate with different positions of load. Measured from the bridge design. Report No. RR144, Department of Highways, Ontario,
obtuse corner the position of the point of contraflexure March, 1969.
had a maximum value of 0.161,. Although the values of (5) ROBINSON, K. E. The behaviour of simply supported skew bridge slabs
moments at the acute corner are relatively small, a under concentrated loads. Cement and Concrete Association, Research
Report 9, 1959.
second point of contraflexure can be distinguished at a (6) MEHMEL, A. and WEISE, H. Model investigation on skew slabs on
point approximately 0.51, from the corner. elasrically yieldingpoint supports. Cement and Concrete Association Library
(5) The largest values of twisting moment occurred at Translation No. 123, 1963, London.
points close to the free edges and towards the obtuse (7) ANDRA, W. and LEONHARDT, F. Influence of the spacing of the bearings
on bending moments and reactions in single-span skew slabs. Cement and
corner, and demonstrated a steep stress gradient. Concrete Association Library Translation No. 99, 1960, London.
(8) JAEGER, L. G. Elementary theory of elastic plates 1964 (Pergamon Press,
APPENDIX Oxford) pp. 23-29.
REFERENCES (9) COULL, A. ‘Comer forces in plate theory’, The Engineer 1965 220,
335-336.
(1) TIMOSHENKO, S. P. and WOINOWSKY-KRIEGER, S . Theory ofplates (10) REISSNER, E. ‘Onbending of elastic plates’, Quart. J. Appl. Maths. 1947 5,
and shells. 2nd edition, 1959 (McGraw-Hill, New York). 55.
(2) RUSCH, H. and HERGENRODER, A. Influence surfaces for moments in (11) Department of the Environment. ‘Programs for the analysis and design of
skew slabs. Cement and Concrete Association Library Translation, 1961, reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete slab bridges’, HECB/B/13,
London. Strand-Version 2, Program PSALM, 1976.