FINAL DEFENSE MINUTES - 90.00 and above, 85.

00-
89.99,80.00-84.99, 75.00-
79.99, below 75
DATE: AUGUST 26, 2021 ❖ Data gathering procedure
• 2nd paragraph, 1st sentence, this
RESEARCHERS: ABARQUEZ, ROSE
should be discussed in your
JEANETTE
research instrument
DIEGO, MARICEL
❖ Statistical treatment of data
MAAGMA, NICE
• Revise the definition of
frequency, percentage, and
❖ Title page:
mean
• title should be inverted pyramid
• Give the operational definition
• only title and names of
of each tool not the conceptual
researchers should be bold
definition.
• researchers’ name should be
• Test for significance of Rho- to
moved down
determine if the relationship
• update month and date between…
❖ Abstract ❖ Chapter 4
• Justify paragraph • For problem 2, descriptive
❖ Acknowledgment equivalent should coincide to
• Use transitional words in every the scale you presented in
paragraph chapter 3
• Names of individuals being • For problem 3, Table 4.1 to 4.5
mentioned should be bold should be omitted
❖ Table of contents • Retain table 4.6, make it as
• Leave space for every chapter your table 4
• List of tables should be in
separate sheets ❖ Chapter 5
• Page numbering should be • Make summary of findings
changed based on problem 1-4
• Indicate the page number in • Conclusion based on your
your appendices summary of findings, start with
❖ Background of the study problem 2 to 4
• No citation of sources in the first • Recommendation based on
paragraph (own stand) conclusion considering your
❖ Statement of the problem significance
• State your null hypothesis
correctly, it should be, “there is” ❖ Photos in curriculum vitae should be
❖ Research design changed
• Omit the word quantitative
❖ Research Instrument
• adjectival rating should be
changed to descriptive
equivalent
- For descriptive equivalent,
use very low, low,
moderately high, and very
high
- Improve descriptive
interpretation
• Scale for Academic
performance:
- descriptor should be
changed to descriptive
equivalent
- Scaling should be changed,
use two decimal places