Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Luis A. Anchordoqui
Lesson III
February 23, 2016
arXiv:0706.1988
L. A. Anchordoqui (CUNY) Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology 2-23-2016 1 / 29
Table of Contents
1 Stellar Evolution
Nucleosynthesis
White dwarfs and the Chandrasekhar limit
Supernovae
G Star form when gaseous (mostly 1 H) clouds contract due to pull of gravity
G Energy releasy in 1 H fusion reactions
Literature: Longair: §8, 10, 12 & 13 HEA 09/ pag
produces outward pressure to halt inward gravitational contraction
L. A. Anchordoqui (CUNY) Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology 2-23-2016 3 / 29
Stellar Evolution Nucleosynthesis
Example
Sun has been on main sequence for ∼ four and a half billion years
olutionIt will
of Sun-like Stars
probably remain there another 4 or 5 billion years
As becomes red giant expected to grow out to Mercury’s orbit
Further fusion reactions are possible + 42He fusing with 126C to form 168O.
In very massive stars + higher Z elements ( e.g. 20Ne or 24
10 12Mg ) can be made
Red supegiants
As massive red supergiants age
stars produce “onion layers” of heavier elements in their interiors
As a consequence
core of iron builds up in centers of massive supergiants
Red Supergiant
Sirius
Sirius @ 2.6 pc + fifth closest stellar system to Sun
In statistical mechanics
Heisenbergs uncertainty principle + ∆x∆p ≥ }
together with Pauli’s principle
imply that each phase-space volume }−1 dx dp
can be occupied by only one fermionic state
L. A. Anchordoqui (CUNY) Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology 2-23-2016 14 / 29
make the following as- Stellar Evolution White dwarfs and the Chandrasekhar limit
vi
}2 n5/3
P ≈ nvp ≈ ⇒ P ∝ ρ5/3 (5)
m
For relativistic particles + v = c
GM2
Pc ∼ (9)
R4
and 5/3
5/3 M KM5/3
P = Kρ ∼K = (10)
R3 R5
we have
GM2 KM5/3
= (11)
R4 R5
or
M(10−12)/6 1
R= = (12)
K KM1/3
G If small differences in chemical composition + neglected
there is unique relation between mass and radius
G Radius of white dwarf stars decreases for increasing masses
suggesting that there exists maximal mass
L. A. Anchordoqui (CUNY) Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology 2-23-2016 18 / 29
Stellar Evolution White dwarfs and the Chandrasekhar limit
Balance equation
}2 N 5/3 GM2
U ( R) = Ukin + Upot ∼ 2
− (14)
2mR R
c} N 4/3
Ukin ∼ Nc}n1/3 ∼ (15)
R
and
c} N 4/3 GM2
U ( R) = Ukin + Upot ∼ − (16)
R R
If U becomes negative
and can be made arbitrary small by decreasing R
star collapses
L. A. Anchordoqui (CUNY) Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology 2-23-2016 20 / 29
Stellar Evolution White dwarfs and the Chandrasekhar limit
Supernova explosion
Kinetic energy
R2 R5
Ekin ∼ Mu2sh ∼ ρ1 R3 = ρ 1 2 (21)
t2 t
What about thermal energy in bubble created by explosion?
If P is postshock pressure + thermal energy should be of order
3
Ethem ∼ PV (22)
2
2ρ1 u21
P2 ' (24)
γ+1
Next Class:
diffuse shock acceleration in SNRs
The Rankine-Hugonoit relations for the shock tell us
SN1604 (Kepler) SNR-0509-67.5 (LMC) SN1006
⇢1 v2 1 2
ock wave travel and what is left behind? The problem = of = +
⇢2 v1 + 1 ( + 1)M2
known as Sedov-Taylor explosion,
where after the two scientists
v1
alytic (and in part numerical) means in the context of M = c
1
Today, the problem can provide
is theaMachusefulnumbertestoftothevalidate
shock. For a strong explosion, the
cal scheme, because an analytic solution
background mediumfor it can small,
is negligibly be so that the Mach number
be compared to numerical results. Also, the problemRankine-Hugonoit relation is
in this limit. For the pressure, the
to demonstrate the power of dimensional
Chandra/HST/VLA/GBT analysis and
P2 2 M2 1
=
P1 +1 +1
L. A. Anchordoqui (CUNY) Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology 2-23-2016 28 / 29
2
Stellar Evolution Supernovae
R5
Etherm ∼ P2 R3 ∼ ρ1 u21 R3 ∼ ρ1 (25)
t2
Total energy
R5
E = Ekin + Etherm ∼ ρ1 (26)
t2
Shock front radius 1/5
Et2
R(t) ∼ (27)
ρ1
Expanding shock wave slows down as it expands
1/5 1/2
2 E 2 E
ush = = R−3/2 (28)
5 ρ1 t3 5 ρ1
L. A. Anchordoqui (CUNY) Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology 2-23-2016 29 / 29