Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/assertiveness/how-to-
be-more-assertive-part13.html
There are a number of articles for you to read, covering various aspects of how to
be more assertive.
These articles are listed on the right side of this and every subsequent article.
At the end of each article there is a question for you to think about or activity to
try.
We strongly recommend that you don't skip these, but spend some time thinking
about them, even if only a couple of minutes. They will improve the impact of the
course on your level of assertiveness. It would be ideal if you were to work
through this course with someone else. Discussing these questions with others is
of significant benefit in becoming more assertive.
At the end of the series of articles there is an activity to produce a personal action
plan.
Don't wait until the end. Start thinking from the start about the question: "what
can I do differently to be more assertive?".
You will hopefully find much of these course interesting and of benefit. However, you
may think that some of the approaches or techniques outlined in this course may not work
for you. If that is the case as you are reading a page, don't skip the page and go to the next
article. Rather, consider if there is a variation of the technique, or a 'subset' of the
approach described, or an adaptation of it, that you can use. There is no benefit for you in
critiquing the course. There is benefit for you in finding those parts of the course that you
can use, and applying them in your daily life.
Throughout the workshop, make notes of important points as they occur to you. You will
find them useful to refer to at the end of the course, when you review what you have
learned and decide what you want to put into action.
NB: Some of the activities involve writing answers. You may therefore find it easier to
print the article and write your answers on the print out. You can print these articles for
personal use.
If you are a trainer, and want to print the articles for use in an assertiveness workshop,
then please see details of permissions on the contact page. In summary, that page says the
articles can be printed for use as handouts in exchange for a link to our website, but they
cannot be electronically reproduced. More details are on the contact page.
Dictionary.com
Game theory
A Win-win; you and the other person both get what you want.
Enjoying your rights, expressing your feelings, asking for what you want, stating your
views - with integrity, honesty, directness, respect for others.
There are many different views on what assertiveness is. But what matters for this course
is the definition that is relevant to you and your circumstances.
Questions
NB: print this page and complete the follow questions in order (the same question is
deliberately repeated as this is an iterative process):
1. What do you want to be able to do after this workshop that you could not do before?
2. What would the above behaviour (your answer to question 1) give you that you that
you didn't have before?
3. And what would that (your answer to question 2) give you that you didn't have before?
4. And what would that (your answer to question 3) give you that you didn't have before?
5. And what would that (your answer to question 4) give you that you didn't have before?
6. This next question is a bit harder, and you will probably need to keep thinking about it
long after you have completed this course: what is the best way for you to get the above
(ie your answer to question 5).
You get
Concede Negotiate
what you want
You don�t get
Withdraw Demand
what you want
SITUATIONAL I don�t get I get
TACTICS what I want what I want
So, for example, to "concede" means "I don't get what I want, but you get what you
want". That is, if you concede then you are saying "you win, I lose".
These are called "situational tactics" because they are behaviours that you can use in
different situations. In fact, depending on the situation, there are times when it is
appropriate to each of these.
Incidentally, there is an approach that could be considered to be another tactic - to
compromise. However, this tactic forms part of the negotiation process.
Questions
1. Think of some examples of situations when it might be best or appropriate to use each
of these tactics - try to think of two scenarios for each:
Negotiate
Concede
Demand
Withdraw
2. How do you feel about using each of these tactics personally? If it helps, think of
situations when you have behaved in this way, and recall how you felt at the time:
Negotiate
Concede
Demand
Withdraw
3. Finally, how do you feel when someone else uses these tactics with you? Again, if it
helps, think of situations when someone has behaved in this way and recall your reaction
and feelings:
Negotiate
Concede
Demand
Withdraw
This is an extreme example, but each of these tactics can also be used appropriately in
normal circumstances. For example, it can be appropriate in the middle of a negotiation
to "withdraw", in order to collect your thoughts or reflect on the progress so far.
Sometimes you may decide to concede simply because you want to 'choose your battles',
and only spend time on those issues that are worth the time and effort.
From the above examples you can see that there are times when it is appropriate to be
unassertive. It depends on the circumstances, and it is your choice.
Problems tend to arise, however, when unassertiveness becomes a habit, or when the
wrong tactics are used for the situation. If you meet a mugger in the street, for example,
the most sensible thing to do is withdraw (if that is possible): trying to negotiate is rarely
a sensible strategy in that circumstance.
Life Stance
A 'life stance' is a tendency to use a particular tactic as the first, or even only, choice.
You get
Submissive Assertive
what you want
You don�t get
Passive- Aggressive Aggressive
what you want
LIFE I don�t get I get
STANCE what I want what I want
Questions
Which of the four styles do you tend to use more than others?
Why?
Which of the four styles (if any) do you find it difficult to use?
Why?
RIGHTS Me My Boss
To make a mistake
To say �no�
Assertiveness can involve defending your rights, whilst respecting others� rights.
Assertiveness can involve carrying out your responsibilities whilst insisting others also
adhere to their responsibilities as well.
Question
What are the main rights and responsibilities that should be observed by both parties in
all your relationships?
Rights Responsibilities
How To Be More Assertive: Part 4
What you believe has a major impact on your behaviour, and your assertiveness.
�If we both express our views, we can then explore ways of both getting what
we want�
�I�ll listen to what you have to say, and I�ll expect you to listen to what I
have to say�
�I�d like someone to drive me to the airport this afternoon. Would you be able to do
that?�
Being direct is, for most everyday matters, the best way to interact. It has a number of
benefits, including:
It saves time
Misunderstandings are reduced
It enables genuine negotiation to take place
You get more easily and quickly to a win-win solution
Other people don't have to second-guess what you are thinking
If you are not direct, it can lead to several problems, such as:
False beliefs
There are some false beliefs about being direct, such as:
All these beliefs are false, and in fact the converse is often true, because when you are not
direct, you:
A Simple Example
Suppose you receive an invitation to a party, but already have other plans and you believe
the other person will be offended if you decline.
Option 1 is to say "Thank you for the invitation. Unfortunately, I already have another
commitment, so I can't come." The other person will accept this and think none the less
of you.
Option 2 is to think the person may be offended by a refusal. So, you think you have to
give a really good reason to show how you would like to go but are unable to do so. So,
you say: "I'd really love to come, but John and Mary don't get out much. I've offered to
babysit. I suppose I could try to find someone else, but I'm not sure I could find anyone at
this short notice. I could talk to them and find out what time they are going, and see if I
could drop in for a short time....", etc.. If you keep up this type of self-justification for
much longer, the person who asked you will be wishing they hadn't (and they might
avoid doing so in future).
Summary
Being direct is a much better option than not. Being direct is being honest and showing
integrity.
Questions
When is it best to be direct?
1. a proposed alternative
�No I can�t take you to the airport. John may know of someone
else going to the airport this afternoon�try asking him.�
2. asking the other person to think of an alternative
�No, I can�t take you to the airport. Who else could you ask?�
3. stating where you agree
�I don�t think that idea will work, but I do agree that something
needs to be done about it, and we�ve got to find a solution�
To manage the other person�s behaviour, you may have to temporarily suspend your
own concern�s and point of view, and manage the structure/agenda of the discussion.
This means:
Outline the process (below) and the principle it is based on: that you are aiming
for a solution that will work for both of you. (If you are talking to your boss, or
someone senior, you will also have to acknowledge their right to make the final
decision).
Each of you explain your positions positively�that is, what you each want.
Ask for, and suggest, potential solutions or ideas.
Assess the idea(s) to see if it meets both your needs. If not, suggest (brainstorm)
other ideas.
If you exhaust all ideas, agree how you will both compromise to find a solution
that partly satisfies both of you.
Choose a solution that meets BOTH sets of needs.
Don�t:
This technique is particularly useful when dealing with your manager, a senior person or
someone in a position of power.
For example, you could point out the discrepancies between the current request and
previous requests. This should not be used to �score points� or to humiliate a person
who is inconsistent�everyone changes their mind. It should be used to identify and then
constructively resolve differences.
Questions
This technique can be particularly useful when dealing with your manager.
However, informing of consequences on their own can have a negative impact. And if the
consequences are manufactured, it can sound like a threat.
It is also very important to state what the person could do to change the consequences.
Eg:
"By giving me this information now, I have to work late to get the report to the client.
Next week, if you provide me the information by Friday lunchtime I�ll be able to go
home on time."
I�m upset by the way you criticised me in that meeting. In future, if you have a problem
with my work, could you please tell me in our one-to-one meetings.
I�m responsible for the management of safety standards in this area, and I�ve asked
you three times to tidy up that cabling across the floor. If you don�t get it sorted
someone might trip over, and have an accident. Either sort it now, or tape off the area so
no one can go into it, and then no one will get hurt.
Question
Under what type of circumstances would it be legitimate to tell someone that, in the
absence of certain actions, you will start disciplinary proceedings?
The origin of put-downs is an insecurity in the other person: they want to make
themselves feel good by making you look bad. This relies on you responding in a way
that makes them feel good, and you going �on the defensive� does just that. Put-downs
rely on a reaction from you.
In the first instance, IGNORE IT. In many cases the person may try a few times to
put you down but, once it becomes obvious there will be no reaction, will stop.
Other people will respect you for it (for being �mature enough� to ignore it).
NB: Don�t let yourself �feel bad� (such reactions reward the put-down
behaviour). Think: �I�ll rise above it. Put downs say much more about the
person saying it than the person the comments are directed towards).
If you feel the need to deal with a put-down, do so with humour. Don�t treat it
seriously, make a joke out of it�but don�t make the other person the butt of the
joke. Eg: �I�m addicted to those typos, you know. I keep writing perfect
reports and then just slipping those typos in, just to let people know I�m human!
�
If those don�t work, then use �negative assertion� (see next article).
It follows that you should never use put-down behaviour yourself. If you feel the urge to
do so, then you'll need to learn to value yourself more, so that you can overcome the
insecurity that drives such behaviour.
Negative Assertion
Negative assertion involves accepting the truthful part of a criticism made against you,
and stating it in positive terms (and it can be mixed with a bit of humour). Eg:
�You�re stupid�
�Well, I�m not the most intelligent person who has ever walked on the planet.�
�You�re aggressive�
�I don�t let people walk all over me, that�s true.�
Negative Enquiry
�You�re stupid�
�Oh, what specifically am I not understanding?�
�You�re lazy�
�What is it that you think I should be doing?�
Fogging
Fogging involves using words that acknowledge the other person�s point of view, and
accepting that it might be true under circumstances, but without necessarily accepting it is
true of you. Fogging is particularly powerful if you are able to restate the other person�s
opinion in a way that could be true of anyone or everyone:
�You�re stupid�
�That could be true. We all have a stupid side to ourselves.�
Broken Record
This technique is usually only appropriate in situations where you do not have a long
term relationship with the other person, and your rights are being contravened (eg: when
a shop assistant refuses to accept the return of a faulty item). It can sometimes be used,
however, where you are short of time.
In this technique, you simple keep asserting your rights. It is sometimes important that
you understand your rights, and are able to quote reliable sources. Eg:
This item is faulty. Under the Sale of Goods Act I am entitled to a refund and I want my
money back.
I�ve got to go to a meeting. I don�t have time to talk about this now.
Question
In view of the cautions we have given, in what situations might it be suitable for you to
use �broken record�?
The last step is for you to review what has been covered in the course and decide what
you are going to do differently as a result.
You can do this review either by looking at the notes you have made during the course, or
by clicking on the links (right) to revisit the pages.
As a result of doing this online course, these are the things I plan to do differently: