Professional Documents
Culture Documents
liquidity management
CAFTA
Learning objectives
• Understand liquidity management and its key components such as cash forecasting and cash
management.
• Key aspects for cash forecasts and forecasting techniques.
• Deep dive into different types and mechanics of cash pools, including physical, notional and
hybrid structures.
• Understand the mechanics of payment factory through POBO/ROBO models.
• Familiarise yourself with trends and best practices in international treasury through in-house
banks and virtual accounts.
• Learn about the clearing and settlement systems run by banks and the emerging payment
methods.
Treasury Analytics
Page 2 23 August 2021
Draft- For discussion purposes only
1. Introduction to cash and liquidity
management
“Cash is ____!”
King
“Cash is a company’s oxygen supply.”
Ram Charan
Liquidity is access to cash. It is the cash available to an organisation, which is used to pay a company’s obligations and source
additional funds whenever required. It also refers to ability to convert an instrument into cash quickly and without loss of value
It’s a crucial component in treasury operations; operations which are concerned with maximising the benefits of surplus funds
and minimising the cost of shortfalls through careful investment and considered borrowing.
Liquidity management
Cash management
Organizations today are much more focused on cash and liquidity and on ensuring they report it, consolidate it
and plan for it. There is a renewed interest in the, which entails the following processes:
Below are the key pillars of developing a robust liquidity management framework to maximize liquidity, reduce costs,
ensure regulatory compliance and have synchronous control and visibility over treasury activities
Producing forecasts in
Knowing when and where
Knowing when and where currency will identify the size Forecasting should identify
surpluses are expected
funds are required enables and timings of currency flows, changes in requirements for
enables them to be used
them to be obtained and hence indicate the risks working capital, enabling
efficiently either by making
efficiently either internally or over the forecast period corrective action to be taken
investments or by repaying
from external sources which treasury may have to if need be.
borrowings
manage.
Key considerations during a forecast The inputs and influencers (steps 1 and 2) are derived
from various entities around the world, including
business units, procurement units, manufacturing,
Key inputs ► Cross finance, etc.
for functional and
forecasting entity inputs
Popular methods of cash forecasting:
Forecasting types
► Variables that
Key can cause
influencers changes in the
inputs
Direct Indirect
Forecasting ► Short-term,
using medium-term
relevant or long-term
Adjusted net income
methods Receipts and
- Starts with EBITDA and
disbursements
- Good for 30 days actuals adds and subtracts
- Schedules collections balance sheet item
and disbursements in the changes
Financial immediate future
► Liquidity
decision management
making
► Funding and
investment Proforma balance sheet
- Projected book cash
► Risk account on balance sheet
management - Assuming all others have
been correctly arrived
► Valuation
Forecasting horizons
ANI
R&D method ANI PBS
Distribution method PBS ARM
Forecasting and monitoring capabilities improves daily management of liquidity resources and
allows firms to deploy potential mitigation strategies during stress periods.
Algorithmic forecasting uses statistical models to describe what’s likely to happen in the future. It’s a process that
relies on warehouses of historical company and market data, statistical algorithms chosen by experienced data
scientists, and modern computing capabilities that make collecting, storing, and analysing data fast and affordable
Uncover key
relationships and
Predictive forecasting interdependencies Forecast reporting and analysis
► Machine learning models serve as starting
► External factor analysis to improve
point for forecasts
accuracy
► Algorithms adapt over time to new trends
► Understand the root causes of
and emerging patterns, as well as any
variances
observed benefit of prior manual
adjustments due to external events or factors Feedback loop to enable ► Provide insights to the business
continuous model learning
Predictive forecast and adjustment over time Ongoing use of
enables forward advanced analytics
looking analysis and standard
Decision support dashboards provide a
Additional machine learning models and analyses framework for targeted
to provide insights to support efficient and analysis
effective decisions:
► What specific actions will help to reduce SG&A
cost?
► What customers / products do we foresee as
presenting the most revenue / margin
improvement potential?
The landscape of payments is evolving and is faster than ever. With near real time payments available, Treasurers need to
evaluate the best possible medium for connectivity
► Instant or immediate payments are real-time, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; they are born from the need for a faster
alternative to the existing processing systems;
► Local or regional initiatives develop in parallel with cross-border ones. UK’s FPS and Swiss SIC have been recognized as
revolutionary and a gold standard for instant payments;
► The European Payments Council (EPC) published the Instant SEPA Credit Transfer Scheme Rulebook (Instant SCT) in
Instant November 2016 (voluntary scheme);
payments ► In November 2017 the EPC SCT Instant payment scheme became operational, the first for an entire region as large as
SEPA.
► First phase of SWIFT’s gpi (global payments innovation) live with more than 140 banks signed up. Phase two and three
will further enable digitization and also leverage on distributed ledger technologies.
Danish Polish
UK
NETS Swedish Express
Faster Payments Chinese
Bankgirot Elixir
Internet Banking Payment
System
Japanese
Zengin
System
Iceland
USA Greidsluveita
Zelle n
Korean Interbank Home
Mexican /Firm Banking Network
Swiss
SPEI
SIC
Brazilian Taiwanese
STRAF FISC
System Singaporean
Nigerian FAST
NIP
Chilean Countries with instant payment
TEF system
Countries investigating instant
South African Indian Immediate payment system
Real-time clearing Payment Service
• Information in messages
transmitted through SWIFT is
controlled exclusively by the
sending and receiving financial
institutions
‘Global Payment Initiative’, also known by the acronym gpi, is the latest initiative launched by SWIFT to improve the customer-bank experience
in the world of international payments.
By joining all participants in a payment chain through a Unique End to End Tracking Reference (UETR), SWIFT GPI can improve the availability, transparency
and tracking of payments.
High
➢ Same day availability of funds ➢ Full transparency on deducts monitoring and alerts in ERP / TMS
systems
➢ Payments tracking ➢ Additional services (e.g. gpi Stop &
Recall) ➢ Enabling analytics
➢ Transparency on deducts
Low
Live since Oct/Nov 2017 Live since Oct/Nov 2017 Live since Oct/Nov 2018
The Network of the Future needs a modern payment architecture to successfully meet and sustain future market trends while complying
with safety and regulatory requirements. We see three core characteristics informing this network model: multi-capability platform,
open ecosystem, and simplified operations.
Industrialized Delivery
• Proven agile software delivery leveraging cloud native tools to streamline activities, reduce
overall dev and test efforts, and decrease time to market
• Defined DevOps & CI/CD strategy to achieve both high speed, reliability and performance
• Well architected payments platform to take advantage of new technology advances through
best in class capabilities and proven solutions
Faster Payments Blockchain Data as a Service
Third Party
Allowing new and Payments Capturing additional
data attributes for Products
Multi- disruptive payment Being ready to take on Modular, Nimble & Integrated
types, such as cross the next wave of decisioning and
Capability servicing, e.g., • Design independent, interchangeable modules that are extensible, reusable,
border, real-time payments technology, maintainable and adaptable
Products
Platform Disputes Resolution
Social
payments, etc. such as JPM Coin, Card Digital • Provide seamless integration with channels, data sources addressing batch, near
World Wire, etc.
products products real-time and real-time integration
API-Enabled Ecosystem
Connected Beyond Digital Digital Identity • API enabled for better Integration
and Open Wallets Universal method Digital • Microservices built around business capabilities that can be deployed
Leveraging Internet of Things (IoT), for verifying a digital independently by fully automated deployment machinery
Open Open Banking, web browser payments, identity, cross
Ecosystem API, and tokenization channel, cross
Directories enterprise
➢ Number of bank accounts and banking relationship across the globe to enable the company in
consolidating & rationalising the bank relationship to limited banks
Banks Bank Geographies Currencies Geography wise spread of bank accounts Connectivity methods used (%)
accounts 8.41% Africa
77 725 6 46
13.24% Host to
37.52% 4.83% host
Australia 49%
51%
Other
Geographical spread of top 9 banks South
36.00% America
Region wise H2H connectivity
Bank accounts Connectivity
239
S.No. Banks Africa Australia South America Atlantic APAC Europe Total
Bank accounts
1 BoA 125 26 151 H2H
Host to Host
2 ANZ 81 4 85 H2H 156
136
3 DB 18 63 81 H2H
96 69%
4 Citibank 5 5 10 26 46 Other
5 TD 37 37 H2H 17% 61
84% 60% 37
6 HSBC 1 1 3 5 19 29 Other
0% 0%
7 Bank of China 2 20 22 Other
Australia Europe Asia North South Africa
8 BNP 1 7 14 22 Other America America
9 SCB 4 17 21 Other
Total 12 83 8 202 189 494
➢ Details of the connectivity methods used across banks, regions and country
➢ Enables to Region wise split of bank charges
understand the
wallet share 3.00 50%
40%
and banking 2.00 30%
landscape 1.00 20%
10%
- 0%
Africa APAC Europe Atlantic Australia Not mapped
Amount (in millions) 0.66 1.20 2.43 0.31 0.70
%age 12.45% 22.71% 45.94% 5.78% 13.13%
❖ Decentralized payments is a big challenge for corporates operating at a global level. There are high chances of
payment fraud due to non-standard controls, workflows and disparate systems
❖ Entities spanning across multiple geographies and regions incur high costs in banking fees, manpower and
infrastructure to gain visibility over operations
❖ With rising global operations, increasing M&A activity and banks & financial systems getting inter-twined,
treasuries often struggle with increasingly complex bank relationships, lack of governance and cumbersome
processes for managing and tracking key metrics – the question has been asked more than often – to centralize
or not to centralize?
Typical challenges noted in a decentralized & distributed banking & payments environment
Complex bank
Payment frauds Time consuming Poor visibility of cash
relationship structure
Centralization
VI. POBO &
ROBO
V.
Intercompany IHB
Cross-entity (Treasury
Netting -
Liquidity Functionality)
Cashless
Management —
Global
IV. Centralize
Cash Forecast
& FX Risk Mgt
III. Centralize
II. Cross-entity External
Liquidity Investments
Management-
Regional
Finance
Company
I. I/C Fixed
Loans & “Segregated “
Deposits Liquidity Netting - Cash
Management Settlement
(no co-mingling)
Range of services
Physical pooling is the simplest method to appreciate: Cash is moved from one account to the
other through a physical transfer and then moved back in the morning if required. The actual
transfer happens to a master “concentration” account, and the net position is managed centrally.
• What is possible?
• What is offered?
• What does it cost the bank?
• Is pooling permitted?
• Key issues
• Withholding tax on interest payments – Physical Cash pool
• InterCO loans issues
• FX issues
• Cross guarantees – Notional Cash pool
• Arms length rule
• Is debit interest an allowable deduction?
• Is thin capitalisation an issue?
• Location
• Exchange controls
A Payments Factory refers to an organisation establishing a central hub to gain a degree of central
control and management over the processing of previously decentralised payment flows.
Centralized structure
Initiators
A centralized structure ensures cost optimization and
optimizes efficiencies by enhancing:
and
Approvers
1. Standardization & connectivity
2. Internal reporting Payments Factory
3. Fraud detection
4. Rationalizing banking relationships
5. Supplier visibility for cost negotiations
Multiple
Banks
Bank 1 Bank 2 Bank 3 Bank 4 Bank 5
“Payments Factory refers to an organisation establishing a central hub to gain a degree of central control and
management over the processing of previously decentralised payment flows.
The actual structure of a Payment Factory can manifest in a number of ways with internal factors, such as
configuration of processes, technology and staff, and external factors, such as bank counterparties, connectivity
and account structures, leading to varying models.”
Key features
of payment
Segmented
Centralized
factory
Source: White paper by Jonathan Jordan titled ‘ Payment factories: different ways of achieving payments efficiencies
Africa
Validation
Australia Payment request, approved Payment
invoice processing
Authorization Connectivity via
Asia Pacific Europe
SWIFT, H2H
South America
Reporting
TYPE 2
received from each entity to a format required by bank.
The Shared services team acts as a global accounts payable
Key advantage: Elimination of dedicated technology centre for multiple regions.
requirement by local payment teams for payment processing
Key advantage: Concentration of resources leads to cost
and bank connectivity
savings and enhanced efficiency.
Source: White paper by Jonathan Jordan titled ‘ Payment factories: different ways of achieving payments Source: White paper by Jonathan Jordan titled ‘ Payment factories: different ways of achieving payments
efficiencies efficiencies
Payment
Payment
factory - SSC
factory –
Communication
hub
currency accounts. By using a POBO model, only one account per currency is required, from which payments would be made on behalf
of all group companies. These booking of payments is done on the originating entity's intercompany account. The beneficiary uses
entity name held on the remittance information to identify on whose behalf a payment is made, and reconcile the payment.
Key advantage: Reduction in number of external bank accounts reduces FTE and other operational costs, reduction in transaction fees
Source: White paper by Jonathan Jordan titled ‘ Payment factories: different ways of
achieving payments efficiencies
MODEL A MODEL B
1 2 1 2 3 4 1 2
Purpose of
Process Geographical Cross border Bank fee Type of
Repair cost FX fee connectivity
enhancement consolidation remittances reduction methods used
method
- FTE cost Reduce the Savings can be The company Payment-on- Preference for Implementation
- FTE repair costs should target behalf-of along SWIFT service of BCP payment
reduction in realized in all with selection
reduction close to zero optimizing ~ bureau model to factory solution
SSC set-up by regions of formats avoid setup and
due to leveraging through- covered under 15-20% of enables turning for critical bank
maintenance of
internal low cost • Improved the POBO & the bank FX payments to connectivity accounts based
process opportunities data IHB model by charges fees local payments infrastructure on volume of
realignment in countries quality conversion of under this to avoid transactions.
currency Banks in South
like India • Use of cross border project American, African This would result
exchange losses
unified payments into and margins geographies can be in additional
- Reduction in formats domestic connected using spends for the
responsibiliti • Completen payments Host to host organization but
es for 3rd ess and connectivity improved
parties such accuracy Estimated average EBICs can be used connectivity with
as Infosys, checks unit price per cross- as the connectivity banks
IBM, border payment is method in Germany,
more than 10 times France, Switzerland
Accenture (due to popularity
higher than average and low cost)
unit price per
domestic payment
The In house bank is usually focused as a highly efficient structure for large companies with
• High volumes of transaction
• Multiple legal entities
• Multiple tax regimes
The IHB effectively acts as the “banker” for the parent and the subsidiaries in an affiliated group
A treasury management system or ERP would maintain in-house-banks accounts (“Virtual” bank accounts) to track
the transactions executed by the IHB on behalff of each entity
The IHB is a bank by this definition, but only for group entities
The IHB should be viewed as a captive bank
► Creates opportunities for major cost reductions ► Improves internal controls and standardisation around
► Optimises banking relationships ► Creates new opportunities for efficient risk management
The IHB intermediates cash, foreign exchange, and funding transactions between subsidiaries and
external banks. Once in place, the infrastructure also facilitates centrally managing and
responding to changes in markets, regulation, corporate transformation/M&A, etc.
Cash Concentration
Liquidity ► IHB becomes global pool header to centralize cash, Investments
Management short term funding of subsidiaries, and net investing
Cash Forecasting
POBO/ROBO
Short term
► Sub capital structure optimized by repatriating more
Subsidiary retained earnings to HoldCo, with IHB providing long (Working Capital)
Funding term debt funding, within country thin cap limits for
tax deductibility Long term
(Capital Structure)
246
across all countries
APAC Europe 30,691 m South
272 America 35 1493 m BS&S team
OFFSHORE
➢ Initiate payment proposal
Offshore- Infosys team Pune
➢ Monitor payment status
➢ Reconcile bank/ GL
*For internal teams, this map shows the regions controlled by that team. For outsourced teams, it indicates the location of t he team. IBM team Chennai
information
➢ Payment operations are performed in different geographical locations using disparate Accenture IT finance Brisbane and ➢ Manages payment formats &
team India system interfaces
systems. This leads to lack of central visibility, reporting challenges and lack of
standardisation Payroll team Multiple ➢ Manages payroll payments
➢ Interaction between teams is managed using manual workflows through calls, emails Table 1: Key teams, roles and responsibilities
etc. which may result in operational delays, higher operating costs and operational **In some locations local business units are responsible for the payment process. For some geographies,
risks the local business units may be handling a part of the payments process (for geography specific
information, ref to next slide)
Project scope
#1 #2 #3 #4 #5
Scope components
Offshore- Infosys Rio- Cash mgmt Offshore- Infosys Offshore- Infosys Rio- Treasury
Offshore- Infosys Rio- Cash mgmt
▪ Creation of payment proposal in the system ▪ Generation of payment file in SAP and routing to the bank ▪ Daily computation entity
Process
▪ Review, validation and approval of payment proposal through H2H interface wise Payment forecast
▪ Execution of payment run in SAP/manual clearing of payments ▪ Creation and approval of payment on banking portal ▪ Sending request to
▪ Monitoring of payments on SAP/bank portal treasury for funding
Technology
1 2
Alternative optimisation
initiatives Activity enhancement
a Risks EYRx and inefficiencies IEx
4. Solution analysis
Project approach and coverage
5. Cost-benefit analysis
Understanding payment factory as a solution
Future state in case of payment factory set up
Current state for payments at Rio Tinto Illustrative future state for payments at Rio Tinto
Local business
units Payment factory Banks Multiple
banks in
local
Non geographies
Shared Service POBO
Infosys Pune team Payments
• PO centre
are directly
creation settled
• GRN through
• PR creation
creati respective
on bank
accounts
• Payments process involves multiple teams across geographies for handling the various legs of • All types of payments are initiated in SAP or in the payment factory solution.
the payments. • The role of cash management team (Pune) would get realigned based on activities
• Cash management team (Pune) is responsible for executing payment runs, followed by performed in payment factory.
approval of payments by regional P2P teams. The bank reconciliation is performed by IBM • The role of local business teams would be realigned basis the extent of centralising of
team in Chennai. activities in shared services centre
• For payroll, the payments are made by IBM team in multiple geographies. (* this is based on • For payroll runs in SAP, responsibilities need to be centralized and routed through
limited information received till now) payment factory solution as much as possible after considering the regulatory restrictions
Ernst & Young LLP
EY | Building a better working world
Ernst & Young LLP is one of the Indian client serving member firms of EYGM Limited. For
more information about our organization, please visit www.ey.com/en_in.
Ernst & Young LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered under the Limited Liability
Partnership Act, 2008 in India, having its registered office at 22 Camac Street, 3rd Floor,
Block C, Kolkata – 700016
This publication contains information in summary form and is therefore intended for general
guidance only. It is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of
professional judgment. Neither EYGM Limited nor any other member of the global Ernst &
Young organization can accept any responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or
refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication. On any specific matter,
reference should be made to the appropriate advisor.