Generated on : 20th May 2023 10:30:03 - Subash Kumar

CMRL-PMIS - Non-Conformance Report

NCR No. - P2NCR0TU02NKAB2305161

Corridor NCR Discipline Package

Corridor 3 Quality C3-TU02-Kellys to Taramani

Organization User Raised Date

Larsen And Toubro KALAMEGAM K 2023-05-16 12:00 AM

Due Date Element ID NCR Type

2023-05-27 12:00 AM TGR-Installed Permanent rings damaged

Men Material Method

0 0 1

NC Category Repeated NCR? No. of Repetition (if yes)

Major No 0

Work Activity Reference Document(s) NC Description

Installation of Permanent Rings Number: - 11,Part-2, Section- VII, Employer’s Requirements,1) It has been observed that the non-
35, 42, 44, 58 & 60 in Downline (Kaveri) TBMOCS: - 2.18.8 Segment lining conformances of segment edge damage and
Greenways Metro Station. extrados damage after installation. The installed
rings damaged which affect the integrity of the
lining or its long-term durability.
2) Contractor needs to submit proposal for
remedial or other measures to correct the
defects or negate its effects as appropriate.
Also, shall undertake precautionary measures to
avoid the segment edge damage for achieve the
required design life as stipulated in contract.

Engineer’s Organization Name Originator’s Name Cause of NC

2 242 Installed permanent rings edge damage and
extrados damage which affect the integrity of
the lining or its long-term durability.

Proposed Corrective Action(s) Select Contractor

1

Submission of Compliance

Originator’s Review on Proposed Corrective Action

Sr. No Acceptable Remarks
4218 0

Originator’s Review on compliance

Sr. No Acceptable Remarks
4216 0

Closing of NCR
Sr. No Close-Out Remarks Re-Inspection Date
4219 0000-00-00

Status Comments

Document Attachment
id Name Date Description Type
3749 NCR for installed 2023-05-16 It has been observed that pdf
permanent rings damage the non-conformances of
segment edge damage
and extrados damage
after installation. The
installed rings damaged
which affect the integrity
of the lining or its long-
term durability.
 NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT

ENGINEER
EMPLOYER: CHENNAI METRO RAIL

Project Name : CMRL PHASE 2 NCR No :

NCR
Corridor No. : 03 : Quality Env Health & Safety
Discipline
Raised To : L & T Limited Raised By : Kranthi.P
Area /
Package Code : CP31/TU02 : Downline TBM- GWR to ADJ
Location
Raised Date : 12/05/2023 Due Date : 19/05/2023
Element ID TGR-Permanent Rings Men Material Method
: NCR Type :
(As Applicable) Installation.
No. of Repetition
NC Category :  Major  Minor Repeated NCR?  Yes  No 00
(If yes)
Installation of Permanent Rings Number: - 11, 35, 42, 44, 58 & 60 in Downline
Work Activity :
(Kaveri) TBM Greenways Metro Station.
Reference Document(s) : Part-2, Section-VII, Employer’s Requirements, OCS: - 2.18.8 Segment lining
NC Description:

1) It has been observed that the non-conformances of segment edge damage and extrados damage
after installation. The installed rings damaged which affect the integrity of the lining or its long-term
durability.

2) Contractor needs to submit proposal for remedial or other measures to correct the defects or
negate its effects as appropriate. Also, shall undertake precautionary measures to avoid the
segment edge damage for achieve the required design life as stipulated in contract.

Permanent Ring-11 (S2)- Segment edge damage Permanent Ring-35 (S2)- Segment Edge
damage

CMP2-QAF-013(1) Page 1 of 3 Apr-2021

 NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT

Permanent Ring-42 (S2)- Segment Edge damage Permanent Ring-44 (S2)- Segment Edge
damage

PB-58 (S1)- Segment Edge damage PB-60 (S1)- Segment Edge damage

Originator’s Name Engineer’s Organization Name Signature Date

Cause of NC: Installed permanent rings edge damage and extrados

Proposed Corrective
Action(s)

CMP2-QAF-013(1) Page 2 of 3 Apr-2021

 NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT
Print Name Contractor’s Organization Signature Date
Acceptable?
Originator’s Review on Proposed Corrective Action Yes No

Remarks:

Engineer’s
Originator’s Name Signature Date
Organization Name

Submission of Compliance
Correction & Corrective Action:

Print Name Contractor’s Organization Signature Date

Originator’s Review on
Acceptable?  Yes  No Remarks
compliance

Originator’s Name Engineer’s Organization Name Signature Date

Closing of NCR
Close-Out Remarks :

Re-Inspection date

Engineer’s Organization
Originator’s Name Signature Date
Name
Annexures: Documentary evidence such as Photographs, revised drawings etc.,

CMP2-QAF-013(1) Page 3 of 3 Apr-2021