The Impact of Leadership and Organizational Behavior On Employee Productivity: A Case Study Of

Kerchanshe Equipment

1.1 Background of the Study

Kerchanshe Equipment is a prominent company in the equipment and machinery industry,
specializing in the distribution, sales, and service of agricultural, construction, and industrial
equipment. As a company that relies heavily on the performance and productivity of its employees,
understanding the factors that influence employee productivity is crucial for Kerchanshe
Equipment's success.

Leadership and organizational behavior play a vital role in shaping the work environment and
influencing employee performance. Effective leadership fosters a positive organizational culture,
motivates employees, and establishes clear expectations, while organizational behavior focuses on
how individuals and groups within an organization behave and interact.

Research conducted on the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee

productivity has consistently shown that these factors significantly affect employee performance.
When leaders provide clear goals and expectations, support and develop their employees, and
create a positive work environment, employees tend to be more engaged, satisfied, and motivated,
leading to higher productivity levels.

Leadership styles also play a crucial role in influencing employee productivity. Transformational
leadership, characterized by inspiring and motivating employees, has been positively associated
with increased employee productivity. Similarly, supportive leadership, which emphasizes
employee well-being and provides necessary resources and support, has also been linked to higher
levels of productivity.

Organizational behavior, including factors such as communication, teamwork, job satisfaction, and
organizational culture, also impact employee productivity. Effective communication within the
organization promotes clarity, reduces ambiguity, and enhances coordination, resulting in
improved productivity. Furthermore, fostering a positive organizational culture that values
employee well-being, rewards performance, and encourages innovation can significantly enhance
productivity levels.
The case study on Kerchanshe Equipment will aim to explore the specific impact of leadership
styles, organizational behavior, and related factors on employee productivity within the company.
By examining the company's leadership practices, organizational structure, communication
channels, teamwork dynamics, and employee satisfaction, the study aims to provide insights and
recommendations to enhance employee productivity at Kerchanshe Equipment.

Understanding the relationship between leadership, organizational behavior, and employee

productivity in the context of Kerchanshe Equipment can contribute valuable knowledge to the
field of organizational psychology and provide practical implications for the company's
management team to improve their workforce's productivity, engagement, and overall
performance.

1.2 Statement of the problem

Statement of the Problem:

The problem addressed in this study is the need to understand the impact of leadership and
organizational behavior on employee productivity within the context of Kerchanshe Equipment.
As a prominent company in the equipment and machinery industry, Kerchanshe Equipment relies
heavily on the performance and productivity of its employees to maintain a competitive edge and
achieve organizational goals. However, the specific factors influencing employee productivity in
relation to leadership styles and organizational behavior within the company remain unclear.

Firstly, there is a need to explore the influence of leadership styles on employee productivity at
Kerchanshe Equipment. Different leadership styles, such as transformational leadership or
supportive leadership, may have varying effects on employee motivation, engagement, and overall
productivity. Understanding which leadership style is predominantly practiced within the
organization and how it impacts employee productivity is essential in identifying areas for
improvement.

Secondly, the study aims to identify key organizational behavior factors that affect employee
productivity at Kerchanshe Equipment. Factors such as communication, teamwork, job
satisfaction, and organizational culture can significantly influence employee performance.
Examining the existing organizational behavior practices within the company will shed light on
how these factors contribute to or hinder employee productivity. Furthermore, the study seeks to
establish the relationship between leadership practices, organizational behavior, and employee
productivity at Kerchanshe Equipment. It is crucial to understand how leadership styles interact
with organizational behavior factors and whether certain combinations yield higher levels of
productivity. This understanding will provide valuable insights into the dynamics between
leadership, organizational behavior, and employee productivity.

Additionally, the study aims to identify any potential barriers or challenges within Kerchanshe
Equipment's leadership and organizational behavior that hinder employee productivity. These
barriers may include ineffective communication channels, lack of teamwork and collaboration,
low employee satisfaction, or a negative organizational culture. Identifying these barriers is crucial
for developing targeted strategies to overcome them and enhance productivity.

Ultimately, the study will propose strategies and recommendations to enhance employee
productivity through effective leadership and organizational behavior practices at Kerchanshe
Equipment. These recommendations may include leadership development programs, improving
communication channels, fostering a positive organizational culture, and implementing employee
engagement initiatives.

By addressing these research questions and providing practical recommendations, this study will
contribute to the body of knowledge on the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on
employee productivity. It will also provide specific insights and guidance for Kerchanshe
Equipment's management team to optimize their leadership and organizational practices,
ultimately leading to improved employee productivity and organizational success.

1.3. Research Questions

What are the different leadership styles practiced within Kerchanshe Equipment, and how do they
influence employee productivity?

1. What are the different leadership styles practiced within Kerchanshe Equipment, and how do
they influence employee productivity?

2. How does communication within Kerchanshe Equipment affect employee productivity?

3. What role does teamwork and collaboration play in influencing employee productivity at
Kerchanshe Equipment?
4. How does job satisfaction impact employee productivity within Kerchanshe Equipment.

5. What is the influence of the organizational culture at Kerchanshe Equipment on employee

productivity?

6. What is the relationship between leadership practices and organizational behavior factors in
determining employee productivity at Kerchanshe Equipment?

7. What barriers or challenges within Kerchanshe Equipment's leadership and organizational

behavior hinder employee productivity?

8. What strategies and recommendations can be proposed to enhance employee productivity

through effective leadership and organizational behavior practices at Kerchanshe Equipment?

1.4. Objectives
1.4.1. General Objective

What is the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee productivity?

1.4.2 Specific Research Objectives

1. To examine the impact of different leadership styles on employee productivity within

Kerchanshe Equipment.
2. To assess the influence of communication practices on employee productivity at
Kerchanshe Equipment.
3. To determine the impact of teamwork and collaboration on employee productivity within
Kerchanshe Equipment.
4. To investigate the relationship between job satisfaction and employee productivity at
Kerchanshe Equipment.
5. To explore the impact of organizational culture on employee productivity within
Kerchanshe Equipment.
6. To analyze the relationship between leadership practices, organizational behavior factors,
and employee productivity at Kerchanshe Equipment.
7. To identify the barriers and challenges within Kerchanshe Equipment's leadership and
organizational behavior that hinder employee productivity.
 8. To develop strategies and recommendations for improving employee productivity through
effective leadership and organizational behavior practices at Kerchanshe Equipment.

1.5. Significance of the Study

The significance of the study on the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee
productivity at Kerchanshe Equipment is as follows:

1. Practical implications for Kerchanshe Equipment: The findings of this study will provide
valuable insights and recommendations specifically tailored to Kerchanshe Equipment. The
company's management team can use these insights to enhance their leadership practices, optimize
organizational behavior, and implement strategies that improve employee productivity. This study
will help Kerchanshe Equipment in achieving its goals more effectively and maintaining a
competitive advantage in the industry.

2. Contribution to academic knowledge: The study contributes to the existing body of knowledge
on the relationship between leadership, organizational behavior, and employee productivity. By
focusing on a specific case study, it provides context-specific insights that can enrich the field of
organizational psychology. Researchers and scholars can draw upon the findings of this study to
further explore and understand the dynamics between leadership, organizational behavior, and
employee productivity in similar organizational settings.

3. Enhancing employee well-being and job satisfaction: Improved productivity resulting from
effective leadership and organizational behavior practices can positively impact employee well-
being and job satisfaction. When employees feel supported, motivated, and engaged in their work,
their overall job satisfaction and happiness increase. Consequently, a positive work environment
contributes to higher employee retention rates and attracts talented individuals to join the
organization.

4. Organizational success and competitiveness: Employee productivity is a critical factor in the

overall success and competitiveness of an organization. By understanding the factors that influence
productivity, Kerchanshe Equipment can create a more productive and efficient workforce, leading
to increased operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and financial performance. This study
will assist the company in optimizing its resources, improving decision-making processes, and
ultimately achieving sustainable growth.
5. Benchmarking and best practices: The study can serve as a benchmark for other companies in
the equipment and machinery industry or similar sectors. Organizations can compare their own
leadership practices and organizational behavior with those identified as effective in the case of
Kerchanshe Equipment. By adopting best practices, companies can strive to improve their own
employee productivity and overall performance.

In conclusion, this study's significance lies in its practical implications for Kerchanshe Equipment,
its contribution to academic knowledge, its potential to enhance employee well-being and job
satisfaction, its impact on organizational success and competitiveness, and its potential for
providing benchmarking and best practices for other organizations.

1.6. Scope of the Study

The scope of the study on the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee
productivity at Kerchanshe Equipment includes the following aspects:

1. Geographical Scope: The study focuses specifically on Kerchanshe Equipment, which operates
within a defined geographical location or locations. The research is limited to the context of this
organization and may not encompass other regions or countries.

2. Organizational Focus: The study examines the impact of leadership and organizational
behavior on employee productivity within Kerchanshe Equipment. It involves analyzing the
practices, strategies, and culture within the organization that influence employee productivity.

3. Leadership Styles: The study explores different leadership styles present within Kerchanshe
Equipment and their impact on employee productivity. It examines how leadership practices, such
as transformational leadership, supportive leadership, or other relevant styles, affect employee
performance and engagement.

4. Organizational Behavior Factors: The study investigates various organizational behavior

factors that influence employee productivity at Kerchanshe Equipment. These factors may include
communication practices, teamwork dynamics, job satisfaction, and organizational culture.

5. Employee Productivity: The study focuses on understanding and measuring employee

productivity within Kerchanshe Equipment. It may consider quantitative metrics such as output,
efficiency, or performance indicators to assess employee productivity levels.
6. Recommendations: Based on the findings, the study provides recommendations and strategies
to enhance employee productivity through effective leadership and organizational behavior
practices. These recommendations are specific to the context of Kerchanshe Equipment and may
not be directly applicable to other organizations.

7. Timeframe: The study is conducted within a specific timeframe, which should be clearly
defined. It may involve data collection and analysis covering a specific period, such as a year or
multiple years, to assess the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee
productivity.
 2. LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1. Introduction
The following literature review provides a comprehensive analysis of existing research and studies
pertaining to the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee productivity. This
review aims to shed light on the significant role that leadership styles and organizational behavior
factors play in influencing the productivity levels of employees within organizations. By
synthesizing and examining relevant literature, this review will establish a foundation of
knowledge and understanding for the subsequent study on the impact of leadership and
organizational behavior on employee productivity within the context of Kerchanshe Equipment.

The productivity of employees is a crucial factor in the success and growth of organizations across
industries. It is widely recognized that effective leadership and positive organizational behavior
contribute to increased employee productivity. Leadership styles, such as transformational,
transactional, and supportive leadership, have been extensively studied and found to have
significant implications for employee engagement, motivation, and productivity. Similarly,
organizational behavior factors, including communication practices, teamwork dynamics, job
satisfaction, and organizational culture, have been identified as key influencers of employee
productivity.

The literature review begins by highlighting the importance of employee productivity and its
impact on organizational performance and competitiveness. It emphasizes the need for
organizations to understand the underlying factors that can either enhance or impede employee
productivity. By examining and synthesizing existing research, the review aims to identify the key
theories, concepts, and empirical findings that contribute to our understanding of the relationship
between leadership, organizational behavior, and employee productivity.

Throughout the review, various theoretical frameworks will be explored. These include theories
such as transformational leadership theory, social exchange theory, the job characteristics model,
expectancy theory, and organizational culture theory. Each of these theories provides valuable
insights into the mechanisms through which leadership and organizational behavior factors
influence employee productivity.
Furthermore, the review will examine empirical studies and research findings that support and
validate the theories and concepts discussed. It will analyze the methodologies and outcomes of
these studies to identify common themes, trends, and patterns. The review will also consider any
barriers or challenges that may hinder employee productivity within organizations.

By synthesizing and analyzing the literature, this review will establish a comprehensive
understanding of the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee productivity.
It will lay the groundwork for the subsequent study on Kerchanshe Equipment, a specific
organization, by providing context-specific insights and relevant theories that will inform the
investigation of the relationship between leadership, organizational behavior, and employee
productivity within this organization.

Overall, this literature review serves as an introduction to the topic, setting the stage for the
subsequent study on the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee
productivity at Kerchanshe Equipment. It provides a comprehensive overview of the existing
knowledge and understanding in this field, highlighting the significance of leadership styles and
organizational behavior factors in influencing employee productivity.

2.2 Key Theories

Transformational Leadership Theory: This theory, proposed by James V. Downton, highlights
the transformative impact of leaders who inspire and motivate their followers. Transformational
leaders create a vision, set high expectations, and provide individualized support to their followers,
resulting in increased employee engagement, commitment, and productivity. (Reference:
Downton, J. V. (1973). Rebel leadership: Commitment and charisma in a revolutionary process.
Free Press.)

Social Exchange Theory: This theory, developed by Peter Blau, explores the exchange of
resources and social interactions between individuals within organizations. According to this
theory, employees engage in productive behaviors when they perceive a fair exchange of resources,
such as rewards, recognition, and support, from their organization. Positive exchanges contribute
to higher employee productivity. (Reference: Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social
life. Wiley.)
Job Characteristics Model: Proposed by J. Richard Hackman and Greg R. Oldham, this model
focuses on the design of jobs and their impact on employee motivation and productivity. The model
suggests that certain job characteristics, including skill variety, task identity, task significance,
autonomy, and feedback, can enhance employee motivation and productivity. (Reference:
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory.
Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279.)

Expectancy Theory: Developed by Victor H. Vroom, this theory posits that employees are
motivated and productive when they believe their efforts will lead to desirable outcomes.
Expectancy theory emphasizes the importance of individual perceptions of effort-performance
expectancy, performance-reward expectancy, and valence (value) of outcomes in influencing
employee productivity. (Reference: Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley.)

Organizational Culture Theory: Organizational culture refers to the shared values, beliefs,
norms, and practices within an organization. Edgar H. Schein's theory highlights the role of
organizational culture in shaping employee behaviors and performance. A positive and supportive
organizational culture that promotes collaboration, innovation, and employee well-being can foster
higher levels of employee productivity. (Reference: Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture
and leadership. John Wiley & Sons.)

These key theories provide theoretical foundations for understanding the relationship between
leadership, organizational behavior, and employee productivity. They offer insights into the
mechanisms through which leadership styles, organizational behavior factors, and motivational
processes influence employee productivity in organizational settings.

2.2 Empirical Findings

Empirical findings related to the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee
productivity provide valuable insights into the relationship between these factors. While the
specific empirical findings can vary across studies, here are some common themes and findings
that have emerged from research in this area:

1. Transformational Leadership and Employee Productivity: Numerous studies have found a

positive association between transformational leadership and employee productivity.
Transformational leaders inspire and motivate their followers, creating a sense of shared vision
and purpose. This leadership style fosters higher levels of employee engagement, commitment,
and intrinsic motivation, ultimately leading to increased productivity levels.

2. Supportive Leadership and Employee Productivity: Supportive leadership, characterized by

providing resources, guidance, and support to employees, has also been linked to higher employee
productivity. Studies have shown that when leaders are supportive, accessible, and empathetic,
employees feel valued and empowered, leading to increased job satisfaction and productivity.

3. Communication and Employee Productivity: Effective communication within organizations

has consistently been found to enhance employee productivity. Clear and transparent
communication channels facilitate information flow, coordination, and collaboration among
employees, leading to improved productivity levels. Open communication also enables feedback
and idea sharing, which can further boost employee engagement and performance.

4. Organizational Culture and Employee Productivity: Studies have highlighted the significant
impact of organizational culture on employee productivity. Positive and supportive organizational
cultures, characterized by trust, teamwork, and employee development, have been associated with
higher levels of productivity. When employees feel valued, empowered, and aligned with the
organizational values and goals, they are more likely to be motivated and productive.

5. Teamwork and Collaboration: Research consistently demonstrates that effective teamwork

and collaboration positively impact employee productivity. When employees work together
cohesively, leveraging their diverse skills and knowledge, productivity and efficiency increase.
Collaboration facilitates problem-solving, knowledge sharing, and innovation, leading to
improved overall productivity.

6. Job Design and Employee Productivity: Empirical findings indicate that job design, including
factors such as task variety, autonomy, and feedback, can significantly influence employee
productivity. Jobs that offer a variety of tasks, opportunities for autonomy and decision-making,
and regular feedback on performance tend to result in higher levels of employee engagement and
productivity.
7. Employee Engagement and Productivity: Studies consistently highlight the strong
relationship between employee engagement and productivity. Engaged employees are more
committed, motivated, and focused on their work, leading to higher productivity levels. Factors
such as leadership practices, organizational support, job satisfaction, and recognition contribute to
employee engagement and, subsequently, productivity.
 3. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

3.1. Research Design

A correlational research design aims to examine the relationship between variables without
manipulating them. In this case, the research seeks to explore the relationship between leadership
styles, organizational behavior factors, and employee productivity within Kerchanshe Equipment.
The design allows for the measurement of variables and the analysis of their associations,
providing insights into the extent and nature of the relationship.

Through a correlational research design, data can be collected on leadership styles (e.g.,
transformational, transactional), organizational behavior factors (e.g., communication practices,
teamwork dynamics, job satisfaction), and employee productivity. The design enables the
examination of how variations in these variables correspond or relate to each other, providing a
quantitative assessment of the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee
productivity.

This research design does not involve manipulation or control of variables, but rather focuses on
observing and measuring existing conditions within the organization. It allows for the
identification of potential associations and patterns, providing valuable insights into the
relationship between leadership, organizational behavior, and employee productivity.

To enhance the research design, a mixed-methods approach could be considered. In addition to the
correlational design, qualitative methods such as interviews or focus groups could be utilized to
gain a deeper understanding of employees' perceptions and experiences related to leadership and
organizational behavior. This combination of quantitative and qualitative data would provide a
more comprehensive understanding of the research topic.

3.1.1. Population and Sampling

The population for this study would be the employees of Kerchanshe Equipment. The population
consists of individuals working at various levels and departments within the organization. The
selection of the appropriate sampling method is crucial to ensure that the sample represents the
larger population and provides valid and reliable result.
For this study we aim to use Probability sampling which ensures that every member of the
population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample, which enhances the
representativeness of the findings and allows for generalization of the results to the larger
population. Among probability sampling methods, stratified random sampling is particularly
suitable for this study due to the following reasons:

1. Heterogeneity within the Population: Kerchanshe Equipment likely has a diverse workforce
with employees holding different positions, working in various departments, and having varying
levels of experience. Stratified random sampling allows for the division of the population into
meaningful subgroups (strata) based on these characteristics. This ensures that each subgroup is
adequately represented in the sample, capturing the diversity within the organization.

2. Variation in Leadership Styles and Organizational Behavior: Since the study focuses on the
impact of leadership styles and organizational behavior on employee productivity, it is crucial to
ensure that different types of leaders and organizational behaviors are included in the sample.
Stratified random sampling allows for proportional representation of different strata, ensuring that
leaders from different departments and levels are included, along with a variety of organizational
behavior practices.

3. Precision and Efficiency: Stratified random sampling can improve the precision and efficiency
of the study. By selecting participants from each stratum, it ensures that the sample includes an
adequate representation of all relevant groups. This enables more accurate estimation of
relationships and allows for subgroup analyses, if desired. Additionally, by targeting specific strata,
the sampling process becomes more efficient as it focuses on the relevant groups of interest.

4. Generalizability: Probability sampling, specifically stratified random sampling, provides a

greater opportunity for generalizability. By ensuring a representative sample, the findings can be
more confidently generalized to the larger population of employees at Kerchanshe Equipment.

3.1.2. Sample Size

For this study we have 3 groups like Top Managers, Midlevel Managers and Employees. so, we
have categorized them in this way. Strata and sample will be selected from each stratum by using
Yamane formula.
 𝑁 75
= = 63, plus 10%*63 =6 total sample (N) =63+6 = 69
1+𝑁𝑒2 1+75(0.05)(0.06)

Group of the population Population Rate Sample Size Remark

Top level Managers 15 20% 14 15/75*69
Mid-level Managers 20 27% 18 20/75*69
Employees 40 53% 37 40/75*69
Total Pop 75 69

3.2. Data Collection

Data collection for the study on the impact of leadership and organizational behavior on employee
productivity in the case of Kerchanshe Equipment can involve a combination of quantitative and
qualitative methods to gather comprehensive insights.

1. Quantitative Data Collection:

Quantitative data collection involves gathering numerical data to measure and analyze variables
related to leadership, organizational behavior, and employee productivity. Common methods for
quantitative data collection include:

a. Surveys/Questionnaires: Develop a structured questionnaire that includes validated scales

and measures to assess leadership styles, organizational behavior factors, and employee
productivity. Administer the questionnaire to a representative sample of employees at Kerchanshe
Equipment. Surveys can be conducted online, through email, or in-person.

B. Existing Data: Consider accessing existing organizational data, such as performance metrics,
productivity records, or employee satisfaction surveys, which may already be available within
Kerchanshe Equipment. These data sources can provide valuable insights into employee
productivity and organizational behavior.

C. Archival Research: Review relevant documents, reports, and records within the organization
that provide information on leadership practices, organizational policies, and past performance
evaluations. Archival research can supplement quantitative data collection by providing historical
context and additional data points.

2. Qualitative Data Collection:

Using Qualitative data collection methods will allow us for a deeper understanding of employee
experiences, perceptions, and attitudes related to leadership and organizational behavior.

A. Interviews: We will Conduct semi-structured interviews with a subset of employees to explore

their perspectives on leadership styles, organizational behavior factors, and their impact on
productivity. Interviews provide an opportunity to delve into individual experiences, gather rich
narratives, and capture diverse viewpoints.

B. Focus Groups: Organize focus groups with small groups of employees to facilitate group
discussions and generate insights on leadership and organizational behavior. The reason we use a
Focus groups is that it can uncover shared experiences, identify common themes, and provide
interactive discussions among participants.

C. Observations: Conduct observations within the workplace to directly observe leadership

behaviors, organizational dynamics, and employee interactions. Observational data can provide
valuable context and supplement other data collection methods.

3.3. Data Analysis Strategies

Descriptive Statistic and Correlation Analysis will be used to interpretate the data collected.

Descriptive Statistics: Begin by conducting descriptive statistics to summarize and describe the
key variables in the study. Calculate measures such as means, standard deviations, frequencies,
and percentages to provide an overview of the data. This analysis helps in understanding the central
tendencies and distributions of the variables.

Correlation Analysis: Use correlation analysis to examine the relationships between variables.
Calculate correlation coefficients (e.g., Pearson's correlation) to assess the strength and direction
of associations between variables such as leadership styles, organizational behavior factors, and
employee productivity. This analysis helps identify potential connections between variables.

3.4. Ethics and Human Subjects Issues

During data collection and interpretation avoiding bias and fulfilling research ethics is among the
most important tasks in any research. This project will follow both ethical and other regulations in
order to maximize the reliability and validity of the research. Respondents answer will be kept
anonymous and the personal view of the researchers will not be included in analysis.
 REFERENCE

- Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.).

- Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (Eds.). (2013). Transformational and charismatic
leadership: The road ahead.
- Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.).
- Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.).
- Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A
meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755-768.
- Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., & Campbell, T. T. (2021). Organizational behavior (18th ed.).
- McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (8th ed.).
- Luthans, F. (2020). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (14th ed.).
- Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective,
continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of
antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
- Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook
of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (Vol. 1).
- Ployhart, R. E., & Moliterno, T. P. (2011). Emergence of the human capital resource: A
multilevel model. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 127-150.
- Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of
a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279.
- Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.).
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-
mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.).