http://bpmsg.

com AHP 01/05/2023

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (EVM multiple inputs)

K. D. Goepel Version 07.07.2022 Free web based AHP software on: https://bpmsg.com
Only input data in the light green fields and worksheets!
n= 6 Number of criteria (2 to 10) Scale: 1 AHP 1-9

N= 4 Number of Participants (1 to 20) a: 0,1 Consensus: ######

3 9
p= 0 selected Participant (0=consol.) 2 7 Consolidated
Objective

Author
Date Thresh: 1E-08 Iterations: 5 EVM check: 1,3E-09

Table Criterion Comment Weights +/-

1 Administrasi 6,2% 0,5%
2 Kualitas 25,0% 2,0%
3 Pengiriman 16,8% 1,7%
4 Keuangan 9,8% 0,6%
5 Teknis 23,5% 2,8%
6 Penawaran Harga 18,7% 2,7%
7 0,0% 0,0%
8 0,0% 0,0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the 0,0% 0,0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) 0,0% 0,0%

Result Eigenvalue Lambda: 6,026 MRE: 10,2%

Consistency Ratio 0,37 GCI: 0,02 Psi: 3,3% CR: 0,4% MRE est 10,1%
Administrasi

Penawaran
Pengiriman

Keuangan

Matrix normalized
Kualitas

Teknis

principal
Harga

Eigenvector
0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Administrasi 1 1 1/4 1/3 3/5 1/4 2/5 - - - - 6,21%

Kualitas 2 4 1/5 1 1 1/3 2 3/4 1 1 3/7 - - - - 25,00%
Pengiriman 3 3 3/4 1 1 3/4 3/5 5/6 - - - - 16,77%
Keuangan 4 1 5/8 1/3 4/7 1 2/5 4/7 - - - - 9,81%
Teknis 5 3 5/7 1 1 5/8 2 3/7 1 1 - - - - 23,46%
Penawaran
Harga
6 2 3/5 2/3 1 1/5 1 3/4 1 1 - - - - 18,74%
0
7
- - - - - - 1 - - - 0,00%
0
8
- - - - - - - 1 - - 0,00%
0
9
- - - - - - - - 1 - 0,00%
0
10
- - - - - - - - - 1 0,00%

by K. Goepel AHPcalc-2022-07-08-Summary
http://bpmsg.com AHP 01/05/2023
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 6 Input 1
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM +/-

1 Administrasi 4,9% 1,5%
2 Kualitas 34,7% 8,6%
3 Pengiriman 10,9% 7,0%
4 Keuangan 4,8% 2,2%
5 Teknis 35,2% 10,4%
6 Penawaran Harga 9,5% 5,7%
7 - 0,0%
8 - 0,0%
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the - 0,0%
10 question section ("+" in row 66) - 0,0%
Participant 1 1 04/30/2023 a: 0,1 CR: 7% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Administrasi Kualitas B 7 0,14 0,00
13 1 3 Pengiriman B 3 0,33 0,00
14 1 4 Keuangan B 1 1,00 0,00
15 1 5 Teknis B 7 0,14 0,00
16 1 6 Penawaran Harga B 1 1,00 0,00
0 1 7 1,00 0,00
0 1 8 1,00 0,00
23 2 3 Kualitas Pengiriman A 3 3,00 0,00
24 2 4 Keuangan A 7 7,00 0,00
25 2 5 Teknis A 1 1,00 0,00
26 2 6 Penawaran Harga A 7 7,00 0,00
0 2 7 1,00 0,00
0 2 8 1,00 0,00
34 3 4 Pengiriman Keuangan A 5 5,00 0,00
35 3 5 Teknis B 7 0,14 0,00
36 3 6 Penawaran Harga B 3 0,33 0,00
0 3 7 1,00 0,00
0 3 8 1,00 0,00
45 4 5 Keuangan Teknis B 7 0,14 0,00
46 4 6 Penawaran Harga B 1 1,00 0,00
0 4 7 1,00 0,00
0 4 8 1,00 0,00
56 5 6 Teknis Penawaran Harga A 3 3,00 0,00
0 5 7 1,00 0,00
0 5 8 1,00 0,00
0 6 7 1,00 0,00
0 6 8 1,00 0,00
0 7 8 1,00 0,00
0 15
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

Moderate
3 Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance
another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance
possible order of affirmation
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

AHPcalc-2022-07-08-In1
http://bpmsg.com AHP 01/05/2023
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 6 Input 2
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Administrasi 4,0%
2 Kualitas 15,4%
3 Pengiriman 5,5%
4 Keuangan 27,2%
5 Teknis 10,1%
6 Penawaran Harga 37,8%
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
Participant 2 1 04/30/2023 a: 0,1 CR: 9% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Administrasi Kualitas B 3 0,33
13 1 3 Pengiriman B 1 1,00
14 1 4 Keuangan B 7 0,14
15 1 5 Teknis B 3 0,33
16 1 6 Penawaran Harga B 9 0,11
0 1 7 1,00
0 1 8 1,00
23 2 3 Kualitas Pengiriman A 3 3,00
24 2 4 Keuangan B 3 0,33
25 2 5 Teknis A 1 1,00
26 2 6 Penawaran Harga B 1 1,00
0 2 7 1,00
0 2 8 1,00
34 3 4 Pengiriman Keuangan B 5 0,20
35 3 5 Teknis A 1 1,00
36 3 6 Penawaran Harga B 7 0,14
0 3 7 1,00
0 3 8 1,00
45 4 5 Keuangan Teknis A 3 3,00
46 4 6 Penawaran Harga B 3 0,33
0 4 7 1,00
0 4 8 1,00
56 5 6 Teknis Penawaran Harga B 3 0,33
0 5 7 1,00
0 5 8 1,00
0 6 7 1,00
0 6 8 1,00
0 7 8 1,00
0 15
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

Moderate
3 Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance
another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance
possible order of affirmation
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

AHPcalc-2022-07-08-In2
http://bpmsg.com AHP 01/05/2023
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 6 Input 3
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Administrasi 4,9%
2 Kualitas 13,7%
3 Pengiriman 33,1%
4 Keuangan 6,1%
5 Teknis 12,3%
6 Penawaran Harga 30,0%
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
Participant 3 1 04/30/2023 a: 0,1 CR: 8% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Administrasi Kualitas B 3 0,33
13 1 3 Pengiriman B 5 0,20
14 1 4 Keuangan B 1 1,00
15 1 5 Teknis B 3 0,33
16 1 6 Penawaran Harga B 5 0,20
0 1 7 1,00
0 1 8 1,00
23 2 3 Kualitas Pengiriman B 3 0,33
24 2 4 Keuangan A 5 5,00
25 2 5 Teknis B 1 1,00
26 2 6 Penawaran Harga B 5 0,20
0 2 7 1,00
0 2 8 1,00
34 3 4 Pengiriman Keuangan A 3 3,00
35 3 5 Teknis A 3 3,00
36 3 6 Penawaran Harga A 2 2,00
0 3 7 1,00
0 3 8 1,00
45 4 5 Keuangan Teknis B 3 0,33
46 4 6 Penawaran Harga B 3 0,33
0 4 7 1,00
0 4 8 1,00
56 5 6 Teknis Penawaran Harga B 3 0,33
0 5 7 1,00
0 5 8 1,00
0 6 7 1,00
0 6 8 1,00
0 7 8 1,00
0 15

AHPcalc-2022-07-08-In3
http://bpmsg.com AHP 01/05/2023
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process n= 6 Input 4
Objective: 0
Only input data in the light green fields!
Please compare the importance of the elements in relation to the objective and fill in the table: Which element of
each pair is more important, A or B, and how much more on a scale 1-9 as given below.
Once completed, you might adjust highlighted comparisons 1 to 3 to improve consistency.

n Criteria Comment RGMM

1 Administrasi 6,3%
2 Kualitas 26,0%
3 Pengiriman 23,6%
4 Keuangan 6,1%
5 Teknis 31,1%
6 Penawaran Harga 6,9%
7 -
8 -
9 for 9&10 unprotect the input sheets and expand the -
10 question section ("+" in row 66) -
Participant 4 1 04/30/2023 a: 0,1 CR: 5% 1
Name Weight Date Consistency Ratio
Criteria more important ? Scale A
i j A B - A or B (1-9) B
12 1 2 Administrasi Kualitas B 5 0,20
13 1 3 Pengiriman B 5 0,20
14 1 4 Keuangan B 1 1,00
15 1 5 Teknis B 3 0,33
16 1 6 Penawaran Harga B 1 1,00
0 1 7 1,00
0 1 8 1,00
23 2 3 Kualitas Pengiriman A 1 1,00
24 2 4 Keuangan A 5 5,00
25 2 5 Teknis A 1 1,00
26 2 6 Penawaran Harga A 3 3,00
0 2 7 1,00
0 2 8 1,00
34 3 4 Pengiriman Keuangan A 3 3,00
35 3 5 Teknis B 3 0,33
36 3 6 Penawaran Harga A 5 5,00
0 3 7 1,00
0 3 8 1,00
45 4 5 Keuangan Teknis B 5 0,20
46 4 6 Penawaran Harga A 1 1,00
0 4 7 1,00
0 4 8 1,00
56 5 6 Teknis Penawaran Harga A 3 3,00
0 5 7 1,00
0 5 8 1,00
0 6 7 1,00
0 6 8 1,00
0 7 8 1,00
0 15
Intensity Definition Explanation
1 Equal importance Two elements contribute equally to the objective

Moderate
3 Experience and judgment slightly favor one element over another
importance
Experience and judgment strongly favor one element over
5 Strong Importance
another
Very strong One element is favored very strongly over another, it dominance
7 is demonstrated in practice
importance
The evidence favoring one element over another is of the highest
9 Extreme importance
possible order of affirmation
2,4,6,8 can be used to express intermediate values

AHPcalc-2022-07-08-In4
http://bpmsg.com AHP 01/05/2023
Multiple Input Sheet

AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process

bpmsg.com Multiple Input Summary Sheet

4 = k number of participants
Consolidated = Weighted geometric mean off participants 6 = n number of criteria

C Consolidated 1 Participant 1 1 04/30/2023

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 0,237 0,34 0,615 0,27 0,386 0 0 0 0 1 1 1/7 1/3 1 1/7 1 0 0 0 0
2 4,213 1,316 2,764 1 1,432 0 0 0 0 2 7 1 3 7 1 7 0 0 0 0
3 2,943 0,76 1,732 0,615 0,831 0 0 0 0 3 3 1/3 1 5 1/7 1/3 0 0 0 0
4 1,627 0,362 0,577 0,411 0,577 0 0 0 0 4 1 1/7 1/5 1 1/7 1 0 0 0 0
5 3,708 1 1,627 2,432 1 0 0 0 0 5 7 1 7 7 1 3 0 0 0 0
6 2,59 0,699 1,204 1,732 1 0 0 0 0 6 1 1/7 3 1 1/3 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

2 Participant 2 1 04/30/2023 3 Participant 3 1 04/30/2023

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1/3 1 1/7 1/3 1/9 0 0 0 0 1 1 1/3 1/5 1 1/3 1/5 0 0 0 0
2 3 1 3 1/3 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 1/3 5 1 1/5 0 0 0 0
3 1 1/3 1 1/5 1 1/7 0 0 0 0 3 5 3 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 0
4 7 3 5 1 3 1/3 0 0 0 0 4 1 1/5 1/3 1 1/3 1/3 0 0 0 0
5 3 1 1 1/3 1 1/3 0 0 0 0 5 3 1 1/3 3 1 1/3 0 0 0 0
6 9 1 7 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 6 5 5 1/2 3 3 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

4 Participant 4 1 04/30/2023 5 Participant 5 1 01/00/1900

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1/5 1/5 1 1/3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
2 5 1 1 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 5 1 1 3 1/3 5 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
4 1 1/5 1/3 1 1/5 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
5 3 1 3 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
6 1 1/3 1/5 1 1/3 1 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

6 Participant 6 1 01/00/1900 7 Participant 7 1 01/00/1900

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

8 Participant 8 1 01/00/1900 9 Participant 9 1 01/00/1900

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

10 Participant 10 1 01/00/1900 11 Participant 11 1 01/00/1900

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

6 of 7 AHPcalc-2022-07-08-multInp
AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process (10x10 Matrix) 6
Power Method (Dominant Eigenvalue)
Iterations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20
1 1,00 0,24 0,34 0,61 0,27 0,39 - - - - 0,28 1,50
2 4,21 1,00 1,32 2,76 1,00 1,43 - - - - 1,17 6,03
3 2,94 0,76 1,00 1,73 0,61 0,83 - - - - 0,79 4,04
4 1,63 0,36 0,58 1,00 0,41 0,58 - - - - 0,46 2,36
5 3,71 1,00 1,63 2,43 1,00 1,00 - - - - 1,08 5,65
6 2,59 0,70 1,20 1,73 1,00 1,00 - - - - 0,82 4,52
7 - - - - - - 1,00 - - - 0,10 0,00
8 - - - - - - - 1,00 - - 0,10 0,00
9 - - - - - - - - 1,00 - 0,10 0,00
10 - - - - - - - - - 1,00 0,10 0,00
Sum (col) 16,08 4,0576 6,0636 10,275 4,2956 5,2257 0 0 0 0 Scaling
0,24 0,25
1,00 1,00
0,67 0,67
0,39 0,39
0,92 0,94
0,70 0,75
0,09 0,00
0,09 0,00
0,09 0,00
0,09 0,00
4,26 4,00
Normalization
0,06 0,06 0,06 0,06 0,06 0,07 - - - - 0,0570 0,0621374
0,26 0,25 0,22 0,27 0,23 0,27 - - - - 0,2345 0,2500188
0,18 0,19 0,16 0,17 0,14 0,16 - - - - 0,1576 0,1676776
0,10 0,09 0,10 0,10 0,10 0,11 - - - - 0,0911 0,098101
0,23 0,25 0,27 0,24 0,23 0,19 - - - - 0,2153 0,2346326
0,16 0,17 0,20 0,17 0,23 0,19 - - - - 0,1645 0,1874327
- - - - - - - - - - 0,0200 5,461E-18
- - - - - - - - - - 0,0200 5,461E-18
- - - - - - - - - - 0,0200 5,461E-18
- - - - - - - - - - 0,0200 5,461E-18
Eigenvalue: 6,0257106
Check 1E-09 err: 1,0E-08 3,013E-33
6,0257 Iterations: 5,0E+00 0
6,0257 check: 1,35E-09 0
6,0257 0
I*I 6,0257 0
6,0257 0
6,0257 0
6,0257 7,532E-34
6,0257 7,532E-34
6,0257 7,532E-34
6,0257 7,532E-34

-5,0257 0,24 0,34 0,61 0,27 0,39 - - - -

4,21 -5,0257 1,32 2,76 1,00 1,43 - - - - Co
2,94 0,76 -5,0257 1,73 0,61 0,83 - - - -
A-I*I 1,63 0,36 0,58 -5,03 0,41 0,58 - - - -
nv
3,71 1,00 1,63 2,43 -5,03 1,00 - - - - erg
2,59 0,70 1,20 1,73 1,00 -5,03 - - - -
- - - - - - -5,03 - - -
en
- - - - - - - -5,0257 - - ce
- - - - - - - - -5,0257 -
- - - - - - - - - -5,0257
1,E-06
(A-I*I)x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1,E-11

1,E-16