Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluating The Effect of Different Stress Path Regimes On Borehole Deformation Using Convergence Measuring Device
Evaluating The Effect of Different Stress Path Regimes On Borehole Deformation Using Convergence Measuring Device
Article
Evaluating the Effect of Different Stress Path Regimes on
Borehole Deformation Using Convergence Measuring Device
Jun Hyuk Heo 1, *, Noune Melkoumian 1 and Sam S. Hashemi 2
1 School of Civil, Environmental, and Mining Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
2 Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
* Correspondence: jun.heo@adelaide.edu.au
Abstract: A laboratory study was conducted to investigate the borehole deformation of poorly
cemented sandstone rocks with Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) less than 10 MPa under
different stress path regimes by using a convergence measuring device (CMD). Synthetic thick-walled
hollow cylinders (TWHCs) comprised of sand grains, Portland cement and water were prepared
for this study. A series of mechanical tests including uniaxial and triaxial compression tests were
performed to examine the physical properties of the artificial sandstones. A vertical displacement
loading rate of 0.07 mm/min and confining pressure at a rate of 0.2 MPa/min were applied for
the experiments. The CMD was deployed inside the TWHC specimen to measure the borehole
deformation. Five different stress paths were applied to the specimens to investigate the effect of
stress paths, and three different cement agent contents (10%, 12% and 14%) were considered to study
the effect of cement content on the borehole failure. The effect of the cement content on the borehole
failure was found to be more significant than the effect of change in stress path regimes.
2. Experimental Study
The Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS), triaxial and TWHC tests are the most
widely used and versatile rock mechanics tests for determining the parameters required
for borehole stability analysis and understanding the behaviour of a granular formation
under different stress conditions. In this study, the borehole stability experiments were
performed on TWHC specimens in a modified Hoek cell. During each test, the CMDs were
deployed inside the borehole of the TWHC specimen for measuring the borehole diameter
convergence, and a micro camera with the resolution of 225 pixels per inch (PPI) was placed
inside the hollow platen of the Hoek cell for recording the borehole wall deformation
during the testing and for its real-time visual monitoring. The TWHC specimen was
Geosciences 2022, 12, 317 3 of 14
subjected to an axial stress along the borehole axis, and the confining stress was provided
by a servo-controlled hydraulic device.
A number of laboratory facilities were used for conducting the tests. For applying
vertical stress to the specimen, a servo-controlled axial loading system of 300 kN capacity
with 0.1 N accuracy was used. For applying and maintaining the external confining
pressure at a very low level, the Hoek cell was connected to an automatic hydraulic machine
which had a relief valve and a pressure gage with an accuracy of 0.01 MPa. A 60-channel
data acquisition system was connected to computers to monitor and record axial force,
axial displacement, axial strain, lateral strain, convergence measurement and time into a
storage device.
(a) (b)
Figure
Figure 2.
2. (a)
(a) The
The CMDs
CMDs placed
placed inside
inside the
the Hoek
Hoek cell
cell and
and (b)
(b) the
the view
view from the micro
from the micro camera.
camera.
The end surfaces of each specimenspecimen were prepared to be flat and parallel to each other other
by applying
applying a thin layer of dental paste. LubricationLubrication was was applied
applied on on the end surfaces in
order to minimise
minimise thethefriction
frictionbetween
betweenthe theplaten
platenand andthethe specimen.
specimen. Furthermore,
Furthermore, spher-
spherical
ical platens
platens werewere placed
placed on of
on top topthe
of hollow
the hollow
platenplaten to ensure
to ensure that that a uniform
a uniform vertical
vertical stress
stress was
applied
was onto onto
applied the TWHC
the TWHC specimen during
specimen testing
during and toand
testing minimise the bedding
to minimise error. A
the bedding pair
error.
of pair
A axialofand lateral
axial and strain
lateralgages
strainwere
gagesattached directly directly
were attached to the specimen surface tosurface
to the specimen measureto
local deformations.
measure A small load
local deformations. of approximately
A small 5 N was applied
load of approximately 5 N was by applied
the loading machine
by the load-
as the
ing top ram
machine aswas
the lowered
top ram down to the surface
was lowered down of tothe
theplaten
surface prior to the
of the commencement
platen prior to the
of the test to ensure
commencement fulltest
of the contact between
to ensure fullthe top ram
contact and the
between platen.
the top ram Theand
imagethe captured
platen. Theby
the micro camera as shown in Figure 2b was checked for the clear focal
image captured by the micro camera as shown in Figure 2b was checked for the clear focal point of the camera
and toofensure
point that the
the camera CMDs
and were positioned
to ensure that the CMDs vertically. The experiments
were positioned wereThe
vertically. performed
experi-
with the
ments werefollowing two with
performed loadingthe stages:
following first,
two simultaneous
loading stages: vertical
first,and confining stresses
simultaneous vertical
wereconfining
and applied up to a pre-defined
stresses were applied stress
up level to simulate stress
to a pre-defined the hydrostatic stress condition
level to simulate the hydro-in
the first stage of loading. The second stage was followed by increasing the vertical load
at a constant displacement rate of 0.07 mm/min. Confining pressure was varied in each
test to apply desired confining stress to the TWHC specimen. Figure 3 illustrates borehole
convergence observed by the camera placed above the specimen during a TWHC test under
the first stress path without the CMD placed inside the borehole. The camera captured
three different stages of borehole convergence; Figure 3 shows sand particles beginning to
dislodge followed by visibly deformed borehole and then the fully converged borehole.
creasing the vertical load4at a constant displacement rate of 0.07 mm/min.
6 MPa Confining pres-
Devia
sureREVIEW
Geosciences 2022, 12, x FOR PEER was varied in each test to apply desired confining stress to the TWHC specimen.13 of 15
4 MPa
2
Figure 3 illustrates borehole convergence observed by the camera placed above the spec-
R REVIEW imen during a TWHC test under the first stress 13 of 15
path without the CMD2 MPaplaced inside the
0
borehole. The camera captured three different stages of borehole convergence; Figure 3
Geosciences 2022, 12, 317 0
shows sand particles beginning 5
to dislodge 10
followed 15 20deformed
by visibly 25 borehole6 and
of 14
12
8 10 6 (b)
vertical stress (𝜎𝑧) z and the confining pressure (𝜎𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓) conf were considered and the induced
stresses at the borehole wall were Radial subsequently
calculated strain (%) based onon thetheapplied stresses on
10 stresses at the borehole wall8were calculated subsequently based applied stresses
8.5. Fifth Stress Path
Deviatoric Stress (MPa)
2 simulated
at a location a hydrostatic
in the borehole condition
0 where actingthe on on the boundary
borehole converged of the specimens.
significantly moreThen, thanin thethe
simulated a hydrostatic condition acting
2subjected
MPa the boundary of the specimens. Then, in at
the
second
other step,
CMD.
6 the specimen
Therefore, was
the 0
averaging of tothea vertical
5
two CMD loading
readings increment
10 resulted (normal
in 15
such faulting)
a different
8
second step, the specimen was subjected to a vertical loading increment (normal faulting)
0 corresponding
reading compared to a constant displacement
to the results obtained rate ofthe
forRadial 0.07other
mm/min.
strain (%) During
cement During
contents. the test,yield
the level
0 corresponding to a constant displacement rate of 0.07 mm/min. the Thetest, the level stress
the5specimen
of for confining
4 pressure
with 6
10
10% applied
cement to 15
the
content external
was surface
significantly 6 of
MPathe specimens
less than the was kept
specimen constant
with 14%
of the confining pressure applied to the external surface of the specimens was kept con-
bycement
an Radial
automatic strainpressure
content. (%)
The TWHC gauge system. In
specimens with the10% second and4 stress
14%
MPa path when
cement content thebehaved
stress level simi-
stant
reached by the an automatic pressure gauge system. Inpressure the second stress path when the stress
larly,
level as 2ishydrostatic
Figure
reached
8. Stress4versus
indicated
the
condition,
by
hydrostatic
radial
the stress
condition,
the
strain: confining
(a) 10%
versus the radialcement
confining strain 2
(reverse
content, (b)612%
behaviour.
pressure
MPa
MPafaulting)
When
(reverse
was
cementcompared
faulting)
increased,
content, (c) 14%
wasto in-
ce-
that
corresponding
ment content. to a constant pressure rate of 0.2 MPa/min. The4 lateral displacement
MPa The lateral displace- rate
creased,
Figure 8. Stress versus radial strain: (a)was
10%measured
cement corresponding
0 content, by four to amm
30 constant
lateral pressure
strain rate
gauges ce-of which
0.2 MPa/min.
were connected to the data
2(b) 12% cement content, (c) 14%
ment content. ment rate
acquisition8.5. was 0 measured
and
Fifth linkedPath
Stress toby thefour 30 mmpump
5hydraulic lateral strain gauges
10 systems. 15 which 2 MPawere connected to the
data In acquisition
the In third and0 linked to the paths,hydraulicand pump were systems.
theand fifthfourth
stressstress
Radial
path, strainboth σ𝜃 (%)and σr z wereincreased
increasedsimultaneously
simultaneouslyup attothe a same
8.5. Fifth Stress Path In
certainrate the
value. thirdThen, and asfourth stress
0per the experiment paths,
5 𝜎𝜃 and
plan, 𝜎𝑧
the were
10
specimen increased
was simultaneously
15
subjected either to up or to
until the failure at the borehole wall was observed by the camera. While the yield z
a certain
increment. value. In Then,
orderasto per the experiment
achieve thewithsame plan,
the the
tangential (%) specimen
and was subjected either to 𝜎𝑧
In the fifth stress path, both σ𝜃 andstresses
σr were increased
increase simultaneously
consistently Radial
theat strain
increase same in thevertical
cementstressescontent, atthethe borehole
specimens with
or 𝜎𝜃
wall inincrement.
the initial In
step order
ofby to
the achieve
test, the
thecontent, same
confining tangential
pressure and vertical stresses at the of bore-
rate until the failure atFigure 8. Stress
the borehole versus
wall 12% radial
was strain:
observed
cement (a)
content 10% thecement
camera.
behaved While
differently. (b) the
12%
For thesevalue
cement
yield content,was(c)derived
specimens, 14%
thece- in terms
measured the strain
radial
stresses increase consistently with hole
ment content. wall instress,
tangential
the increase the
in the
was significantly
initial
andcement steprate
thehigher
of the
of test,
thethe
atincreasing
content, a lower
confining
specimensthe vertical
stress with
state,
pressure
stress value
compared was wasconstant
to kept
derived and
the specimens
in terms
withwas 10% and
12% cement content behaved differently. of
Figure the
the same tangential
Forasof
8. Stress the rate
versus
these stress,
radial
specimens, and
of increase the
strain:the rate
in
(a)measured
10% of increasing
thecement
tangential content, the vertical
stress
(b) 12%at the stress
borehole
cement was kept
content, wall. constant
(c) 14% and
It isce-worth
14% cement content. This is likelyradial to be straincaused by one of the two CMDs being placed
was significantly higher 8.5.
at Fifth Stress
a lowerment Pathstate,that
content.
mentioning
stress comparedin an unsupported borehole, 10% r at the andborehole wall is zero.
at a location in thetoborehole
the specimens wherewith the borehole converged significantly more than at the
In the fifth
14% of cement content. This is likely to be In
stressthe fifth
path,
caused path,
both
byTherefore,σ𝜃 and
one of thethe σr
two z were increased
increased
CMDs being simultaneously
simultaneously until
at the the
same failure at the
other CMD. averaging of theplacedtwo CMD readings resulted in such a different
rate until 8.5.
the Fifth
borehole
failure
at a location in the borehole where the borehole Stress
wall
at Path
the was observed
borehole
converged wall by was
significantly the real-time
observed
more camera
by
than the
at recording.
camera.
the While It should
the yieldbe mentioned
reading compared to the results obtained for the other cement contents. The yield stress
other CMD. Therefore, stresses that
increase
the averaging In for each
fifth
consistently
of the TWHC
stress with specimen,
path,the both
increase σ𝜃 ininand the z were
σrcement
were calculated
increased
content, separately
simultaneously
the specimens basedwith on the
atspecimen
the stress
same
fortwo CMD
specimen readings
with 10% resulted
cement such
content awas
different
significantly less than the with 14%
application
rate untilcement
the area
failure and the
at cement
the borehole size. Equations (1)–(5) show the principal stress status
yield at simi-
reading compared to the 12% cement
results content
obtained behaved
for the other
content. Theborehole
differently. TWHC For these
contents. wallThe
specimens wasyield
specimens, observed
with the by
10%measured
stress and the14% camera.
radialWhile
cement strain
content the behaved
the boundary
stresses increase ofaspecimens and borehole wallin for each stress path. The difference between
for specimen with 10%was significantly
cement content higher
waslarly, asatconsistently
significantly lowerless
is indicated stresswith
than
by the the
state,
the increase
compared
specimen
stress versus the
toradial
with the cement
14% straincontent,
specimens with
behaviour. the10%specimens
When and compared with to that
14% of 12%
cementthe first
cement
content. and fourth
content
This is stress
behaved
likely
cement content. The TWHC specimens with 10% and 14% cement content behaved simi- paths
to be is
differently. in
caused the byinitial
For these
one step
of of the
specimens,
the two experiment.
CMDs the measured
being In the
placed first
radial path,
strain the
larly, as is indicated byatthe
a locationwasmagnitude
significantly
in theradial
stress versus boreholeof z
strain is
higher
whereconsiderably
at a lower
the borehole
behaviour. lower
stress
Whenconverged than
state, that
compared
compared significantly for
to that the tofourth
the path
specimens
more than at theuntil the
with end
10% of
and the
other CMD. 14% of cementthe
Therefore, content.
averaging Thisofisthe likelytwoto CMDbe caused
readings by resulted
one of the two CMDs
in such a differentbeing placed
at a location
reading compared to thein the borehole
results obtained where forthe theborehole
other cement converged significantly
contents. The yieldmore stress than at the
for specimen otherwithCMD. 10% Therefore,
cement content the averaging of the two less
was significantly CMD readings
than resultedwith
the specimen in such14%a different
readingThe
cement content. compared
TWHC to the results
specimens withobtained
10% and for14% the cement
other cement content contents.
behavedThe simi-yield stress
larly, as is indicated by the stress versus radial strain behaviour. When compared to thatwith 14%
for specimen with 10% cement content was significantly less than the specimen
cement content. The TWHC specimens with 10% and 14% cement content behaved simi-
Geosciences 2022, 12, 317 7 of 14
first stage of the experiment. The same relationship was applied to the second and third
stress paths.
σ1 = σ2 = σ3 = σconf = σz (first step)
first stress path (1)
σ1 = σz > σ2 = σ3 = σconf (second step)
σ1 = σ2 = σ3 = σconf = σz (first step)
second stress path (2)
σ1 = σ2 = σconf > σ3 = σz (second step)
σ1 = σ2 = σθ = σz > σ3 = σr = 0 (first step)
third stress path (3)
σ1 = σθ = σ2 = σz > σr = 0 (second step)
σ1 = σ2 = σθ = σz > σ3 = σr = 0 (first step)
fourth stress path (4)
σ1 = σz > σ2 = σθ > σr = 0 (second step)
σ1 = σθ = σ2 = σz > σr = 0 ( first step)
fifth stress path (5)
σ1 = σθ = σ2 = σz > σr = 0 ( second step)
8. Results
To minimise the influence of rock heterogeneity on the test results, repetitive triaxial
tests were performed on three specimens for each cement content under various confining
pressures. Different values of confining pressure of 2 MPa, 4 MPa and 6 MPa.
8
7
6
5
4
6MPa
3
2 4MPa
1 2MPa
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
Radial Strain (%)
Figure 4. Cont.
12
(b)
11
2 4MPa
1 2MPa
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
Radial Strain (%)
Geosciences 2022, 12, 317 8 of 14
12
(b)
11
10
9
2 4MPa
Geosciences 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 1 2MPa 9 of 15
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
Radial Strain (%)
(c)
18
16
14
Deviatoric Stress (MPa)
12
10
4
6MPa
2 4MPa
2MPa
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
Radial Strain (%)
Figure 4. Deviatoric stress (MPa) versus radial strain (%): (a) 10% cement content, (b) 12% cement
Figure 4. content, (c)stress
Deviatoric 14%(MPa)
cement content.
versus radial strain (%): (a) 10% cement content, (b) 12% cement
content, (c) 14% cement content.
8.2. Second Stress Path
8.2. Second Stress
ThePath
increase in the cement content had a minimal effect on the stiffness of the speci-
Themens
increase in the
tested cement
under thecontent
secondhad a minimal
stress effect[21]
path. Mogi on the stiffnessthat
suggested of the
thespeci-
stiffness depends on
mens tested under the second stress path. Mogi [20] suggested that the stiffness depends
the rock material and, as the same sand grain sizes were used for the specimen preparation,
on the rock
the material
specimen and, as the same
stiffness sand grain
remained sizes were
unchanged used
in the for the
tests. The specimen
level of prepa-
the confining pressure
ration, the
required to initiate a borehole convergence increased with thethe
specimen stiffness remained unchanged in the tests. The level of confining
increase in the cement con-
pressure required to initiate a borehole convergence increased with the increase in the
tent. This is due to the strengthening effect of the cement. Hashemi et al. [11] have also
cement content. This is due to the strengthening effect of the cement. Hashemi et al. [11]
observed that the poorly cemented specimens with a higher cement content demonstrate a
have also observed that the poorly cemented specimens with a higher cement content
higher
demonstrate peak peak
a higher strength duedue
strength to the strengthening
to the strengtheningeffect
effect of thecementing
of the cementing agent. Generally, for
agent.
Generally, for the second path with an increase in the cement content, the radial strain increased for a
the second path with an increase in the cement content, the radial strain
increasedcertain confining
for a certain stress.stress.
confining WithWithincreasing
increasingthe the
cement
cement content,
content, the
thestiffness
stiffnessof the specimens
in the vertical
of the specimens direction
in the vertical obtained
direction higherhigher
obtained valuesvalues
than than
in theinlateral orientation
the lateral orien- for the second
tation forpath; however,
the second path;the rate of the
however, increase
rate ofwas lower
increase wasfor the second
lower path. path.
for the second
Figure 5 shows that the effect of cement content has a higher influence on stabilizing
a borehole than that of the confining stress applied for the second stress path. The level of
confining pressure required to initiate a borehole convergence increased with the increase
in the cement content. Such observation agrees with [11], where the poorly cemented spec-
imens with a higher cement content demonstrated a higher peak strength due to the
strengthening effect of the cementing agent. Figure 6 below illustrates the borehole failure
Geosciences 2022, 12, 317 9 of 14
Figure 5 shows that the effect of cement content has a higher influence on stabilizing a
borehole than that of the confining stress applied for the second stress path. The level of
confining pressure required to initiate a borehole convergence increased with the increase
in the cement content. Such observation agrees with [11], where the poorly cemented
specimens with a higher cement content demonstrated a higher peak strength due to
the strengthening effect of the cementing agent. Figure 6 below illustrates the borehole
failure process observed from the camera installed inside the borehole. Moreover, the
specimens showed a more ductile behaviour when the equal amount of vertical stress and
the maximum principal stress were applied to them. The borehole failure was observed
at lower strains for the second path compared to the first path, which suggests that the
Geosciences 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 15
tangential stress has the important influence on the borehole failure in poorly cemented
Geosciences 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 15
specimens. Results displayed that the shear bands were formed, and the produced sand
mainly consisted of uniform loose grains.
served, while the vertical stress was kept unchanged. The main difference between the
second and third stress paths was in the initial stage of the test, in which the axial stress
applied to the specimen was considerably higher in the third path for the corresponding
borehole size and specimen outer diameter. According to Figure 7a, with an increase in the
vertical stress, the strength of the specimen reached prior to the initiation of the borehole
failure was noticeably higher on the specimen with 14% cement under 6 MPa than the
es 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 11 of 15
specimen that was under 4 MPa and 12% of cement content. It illustrates that the effect
of vertical stress as a supporting pressure in increasing the ductility for a given cement
content and the specimens exhibited a higher ductile behaviour when a greater vertical
Unlike the specimens
stress wasunder the Furthermore,
applied. first stress path, theincreasing
with trends of graphs
cement from the third
content, the borehole failure at
stress path in general show
the wall wasthat the vertical
observed stressradial
at higher kept strains.
the specimen in the contraction
mode and therefore, the dilation
Unlike was observed
the specimens underat higher
the firstradial
stressstrains. Thetrends
path, the resultsofalso
graphs from the third
showed that withstress
an increase
path iningeneral
cementshow
content,
thatthe
theradial strain
vertical would
stress keptbethe
increased
specimen for in the contraction
certain vertical stress in this stress path, similar to that in the second stress path. This con-
mode and therefore, the dilation was observed at higher radial strains. The results also
firms that with an increase
showed thatinwith
the cement content,
an increase the lateral
in cement strain
content, theincreases in allwould
radial strain the be increased for
stress paths. However, the effect of cement content had less influence than the
certain vertical stress in this stress path, similar to that in the second change in stress path. This
vertical stress. Increasing cement content from 10% to 12% did not result in any significant
confirms that with an increase in the cement content, the lateral strain increases in all the
variation in radial strain.
stress paths. However, the effect of cement content had less influence than the change in
vertical stress. Increasing cement content from 10% to 12% did not result in any significant
variation in radial strain.
(a)
14
12
Deviatoric Stress (MPa)
10
8
6 MPa
6
4 MPa
4
2 MPa
2
0
0 5 10 15 20
Radial Strain (%)
(b)
14
12
Deviatoric Stress (MPa)
10
6
6 MPa
4
4 MPa
2
2 MPa
0
0 5 10 15
Radial Strain (%)
Figure 7. Cont.
es 2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 15
(c)
Geosciences 2022, 12, 317 11 of 14
14
(MPa)Stress (MPa)
12
10 (c)
8
14
6
12
Deviatoric
6 MPa
10
4
4 MPa
Deviatoric Stress 28 2 MPa
06
6 MPa
4 0 5 10 15
4 MPa
2
Radial Strain (%)
2 MPa
0
Figure 7. Deviatoric stress 0versus radial strain:
5 (a) 10% cement 10 content, (b) 12%
15 cement content, (c)
14% cement content. Radial Strain (%)
Figure 7. Deviatoric stress versus radial strain: (a) 10% cement content, (b) 12% cement content,
8.4. Fourth Stress Path
(c)stress
Figure 7. Deviatoric 14% cement content.
versus radial strain: (a) 10% cement content, (b) 12% cement content, (c)
Figure 8a–c illustrate the stress−strain behaviour for the fourth stress path for 10%,
14% cement content.
12% and 14% cement 8.4. content
Fourth Stress Path
respectively. In this path, the confining stress at the borehole
wall
8.4. was increased
Fourth along
Stress Path with
Figure theillustrate
8a–c axial stresstheat the same rate
stress–strain up to 2 for
behaviour MPa.theThen,
fourthvertical
stress path for 10%, 12%
stress was increased and 14%while
cementconfining
contentstress was kept
respectively. unchanged.
In this The trendstress
path, the confining of the
at the borehole wall
Figure 8a–c illustrate the stress−strain behaviour for the fourth stress path for 10%,
was increased
stress−strain relationships in thealong
fourth with
paththewasaxial stresstoatwhat
similar the same rate up toin
was observed 2 MPa. Then, vertical stress
the first
12% and 14% cement content respectively. In this path, the confining stress at the borehole
path where the axial wasstress
increased
was muchwhilelower
confining stress
than that forwas
thekept
fourthunchanged.
path in theThe trend
initial stageof the stress–strain
wall was increased along with the axial stress at the same rate up to 2 MPa. Then, vertical
ofstress
the test. Figure relationships
8a–c show in the
that thefourth pathinstability
borehole was similar to what
occurs at was
a observed
higher stress inand
the first path where
was increased while confining stress was kept unchanged. The trend of the
lower radial strainthe
foraxial
the stress
fourth was
pathmuch
in lower than
different that contents.
cement for the fourth path in the axial
initial stage of the test.
stress−strain relationships in the fourth path was similar to what was Since the in
observed initial
the first
stress was higher Figure 8a–c
forstress
the fourth show that
path,lowerthe borehole
the specimens instability
behaved occurs
in path at
a brittle a higher
manner before and lower radial
stress
path where the axial was much than that for the fourth in the initial stage
the borehole strain for Such
convergence. the fourth path is
behaviour in likely
different
to becement
due tocontents.
the Sincethethe initial axial stress was
of the test. Figure 8a–c show that the borehole instability occurs at aeffect
higherof stressloading
and
rate on the higher
strength of fortested
the the fourth path, the specimens behaved in a brittle manner before the borehole
specimens.
lower radial strain for the fourth path in different cement contents. Since the initial axial
convergence. Such behaviour is likely to be due to the effect of the loading rate on the
stress was higher for the fourth path, the specimens behaved in a brittle manner before
strength of the tested specimens.
the borehole convergence. Such behaviour is likely to be due to the effect of the loading
rate on the strength of the tested specimens.
(a)
7
6 (a)
Stress (MPa)
57
46
Stress (MPa)
6 MPa
35
Deviatoric
4 MPa
24
62MPa
MPa
13
Deviatoric
4 MPa
2 2 MPa
0
1 0 5 10 15
Radial strain (%)
0
Figure 08. Cont. 5 10 15
Radial strain (%)
2022, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 13 of 15
(b)
Geosciences 2022, 12, 317 12 of 14
12 (b)
12
10
Stress (MPa)
8
12
8
6
10
Stress (MPa)
6
4 6 MPa
DeviatoricDeviatoric
8
4 6 MPa 4 MPa
2
6 4 MPa 2 MPa
2
0
4 2 MPa
0 5 10 15
6 MPa 20 25
0
Radial
20 strain
4 MPa(%)
2 0 5 10 15 25
Radial strain (%) 2 MPa
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Radial strain (%) (c)
12 (c)
12
10
Deviatoric Stress (MPa)
10 (c)
Stress (MPa)
8
12
8
6
10
Stress (MPa)
6 6 MPa
4
DeviatoricDeviatoric
8 4 MPa
4 6 MPa
2
6 4 MPa 2 MPa
2
0 2 MPa
4 0 5 6 MPa 10 15
0
4 MPa
2 0 5 10 Radial strain (%)
15
Radial strain (%) 2 MPa
0
Figure
Figure 8.
8. Stress
Stressversus
versusradial strain:
radial (a) 10%
strain: cement
(a) 10% content,
cement (b) 12%
content, (b) cement content,
12% cement (c) 14%(c)ce-14%
content,
ment 0
content. 5 10 15
cement
Figure 8. Stress versus content.
radial strain: (a) 10% cement content,
Radial strain (%)(b) 12% cement content, (c) 14% ce-
ment content. 8.5. Fifth Stress Path
8.5. Fifth Stress Path
8.5. Fifth Stressversus In the fifth stress path, both σ𝜃 and σrr were increased simultaneously at the same
Path radial
Figure 8. Stress
rate until strain: (a) 10% cement content, (b) 12% cement content, (c) 14% ce-
the failure at the borehole wall was observed observed by the the camera.
camera. While the yield
ment Incontent.
the fifth stress path, both σ𝜃 and σr were increased simultaneously at the same
stresses increase consistently with the increase in
stresses increase consistently with the increase in the cement content, the the cement content, the specimens
specimens with
with
rate until the failure 12% at the borehole
cement content wall wasdifferently.
behaved observed by For the camera.
these While the
specimens, themeasured
yield radial strain
8.5. Fifth increase
Stress Path12% cement content behaved differently. For these specimens, the measured radial strain
stresses consistently
was significantly with higher
the increase in thestress
at aa lower
lower cement content,
state, comparedthe specimens
to the with with 10% and
the specimens
specimens
was significantly higher at stress state, compared to with 10% and
12% In cement content
the fifth stress
14% behaved
path, both differently.
σ𝜃 andThis For
σr werethese specimens,
increased the measured
simultaneously of radial
at
thethe strain
same
14% ofof cement
cement content.
content. This is likely
is likely to be
to be caused
caused by one
by one of the two
two CMDs being
CMDs being placed
placed
was until
rate significantly higher
the failure
at a at at aborehole
the
location lower
in thestress
wallstate,
boreholewas wherecompared
observed the to the specimens
by
borehole camera. withsignificantly
While
converged 10%yield
the and more than at
at a location in the borehole where the borehole converged significantly more than at the
14% of cement
stresses increasecontent.
the other This
consistently is
CMD. likely
with theto be caused
increase
Therefore, the bycement
in averaging
the one ofof the two
content,
the twoCMDs
the being
specimens
CMD placed
readings with
other CMD. Therefore, the averaging of the two CMD readings resultedresulted
in such ain such a
different
at a location
12% in the
cement content borehole
behaved
different where
reading the
differently.
comparedborehole
For tothese
the converged
specimens,
results significantly
obtainedthe measured
for the more than
radial
other cementat the
straincontents. The yield
reading compared to the results obtained for the other cement contents. The yield stress
othersignificantly
was CMD. Therefore, the
higherfor averaging
atspecimen
a lower stress of the two
state, CMD readings
compared to the resulted
specimens in such
with a 10%
different
and
for specimen with 10% cement content was significantly less than the specimen with with
stress with 10% cement content was significantly less than the specimen 14%
reading
14% compared
of cement 14%to cement
content. the results
This obtained
iscontent.
likely be for
toThe caused
TWHC the other
by onecement
specimens of the contents.
two
with 10%CMDs Thebeing
and 14%yield stresscontent behaved
placed
cement
cement content. The TWHC specimens with 10% and 14% cement content behaved simi-
fora specimen
at location inwiththe 10% cement
borehole
similarly, iscontent
where wasby
the borehole significantly
theconverged lesssignificantly
than the specimen withat14%
morebehaviour.
than theWhen compared
larly, as is as indicated
indicated by the stress stress
versusversus
radialradial
strain strain
behaviour. When compared to that
cement
other content.
CMD. The
Therefore, TWHC
the specimens
averaging of with
the two10% CMD and 14%
readingscement content
resulted in behaved
such
to that of the first and second stress paths where the confining pressure and axial stress a simi-
different
larly, as compared
reading is indicated toby
were thethe stressat
results
increased versus
obtained radial
a constant for rate
thestrain
other
in the behaviour.
cement When
path,compared
contents.
fifth stress The yieldto
the specimens that
stress tolerated a higher
for specimen withlevel 10%ofcement
stresses content was significantly
surpassing 25 MPa, as can lessbe than
seentheinspecimen
Figure 9. with 14%
It is important to mention
cement content. The thatTWHC
the trend specimens
of the graphwith 10%remained and 14% cement content
unchanged behaved
for different levelssimi-
of stresses applied,
larly, as is indicated by the stressthe
demonstrating versus radialcontraction
consistent strain behaviour. mode under Whenthe compared
fifth stressto that
path.
of the first and second stress paths where the confining pressure and axial stress were
increased at a constant rate in the fifth stress path, the specimens tolerated a higher level
of stresses surpassing 25 MPa, as can be seen in Figure 9. It is important to mention that
Geosciences 2022, 12, 317 the trend of the graph remained unchanged for different levels of stresses applied, demon-13 of 14
strating the consistent contraction mode under the fifth stress path.
35
30
25
Stress (MPa) 20
6MPa
15
4MPa
10 2MPa
0
0 2 4 6 8
Radial strain (%)
6. Bujok, P.; Porzer, M.; Labus, K.; Klempa, M.; Pavluš, J. Experimental modeling of abandoned shallow oil wells convergence. Eng.
Geol. 2013, 157, 1–7. [CrossRef]
7. Wu, B.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, X. Stability of borehole with Breakouts—An Experimental and Numerical Modelling Study. In
Proceedings of the 50th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Houston, TX, USA, 26–29 June 2016.
8. Rawlings, C.G.; Barton, N.R.; Bandis, S.C.; Addis, M.A.; Gutierrez, M.S. Laboratory and numerical discontinuum modeling of
wellbore stability. J. Pet. Technol. 1993, 45, 1086–1092. [CrossRef]
9. Haimson, B.; Song, I. Laboratory study of borehole breakouts in Cordova Cream: A case of shear failure mechanism. Int. J. Rock
Mech. Min. Sci. 1993, 30, 1047–1056. [CrossRef]
10. Younessi, A.; Rasouli, V.; Wu, B. Sand production simulation under true-triaxial stress conditions. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2013,
61, 130–140. [CrossRef]
11. Hashemi, S.S.; Melkoumian, N.; Taheri, A.; Jaksa, M. The failure behavior of poorly cemented sands at a borehole wall using
laboratory tests. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2015, 77, 348–357. [CrossRef]
12. Khormali, A.; Sharifov, A.R.; Torba, D. Experimental and modeling analysis of asphaltene precipitation in the near wellbore
region of oil wells. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 1030–1036. [CrossRef]
13. Khormali, A.; Sharifov, A.R.; Torba, D.I. Experimental and modeling study of asphaltene adsorption onto the reservoir rocks. Pet.
Sci. Technol. 2018, 36, 1482–1489. [CrossRef]
14. Li, J.; Zhang, G.; Liu, M. Experimental investigation on the effect of confining pressure on the tensile strength of sandstone using
hollow cylinder tensile test method. Arab. J. Geosci. 2019, 12, 768. [CrossRef]
15. Yan, M.; Deng, J.; Yu, B.; Li, M.; Zhang, B.; Xiao, Q.; Tian, D. Comparative study on sanding characteristics between weakly
consolidated sandstones and unconsolidated sandstones. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2020, 76, 103183. [CrossRef]
16. Nouri, M.; Khanlari, G.; Sarfarazi, V.; Rafiei, B. Failure Modes Analysis of Sandstones (Case Study: Markazi Province Sand-stones).
Sci. Q. J. Iran. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 2020, 13, 61–86.
17. Fu, J.; Haeri, H.; Yavari, M.D.; Sarfarazi, V.; Marji, M.F. Effects of the Measured Noise on the Failure Mechanism of Pre-Cracked
Concrete Specimens Under the Loading Modes I, II, III, and IV. Strength Mater. 2021, 53, 938–949. [CrossRef]
18. Saidi, F.; Bernabé, Y.; Reuschlé, T. The mechanical behaviour of synthetic, poorly consolidated granular rock under uniaxial
compression. Tectonophysics 2003, 370, 105–120. [CrossRef]
19. Liévano, V.R.; Kanji, M.A. Simulation of arenaceous weak rocks by means of cemented sands. In Proceedings of the 12th ISRM
Congress, Beijing, China, 16–21 October 2011; OnePetro: Richardson, TX, USA, 2011.
20. Hashemi, S.S.; Melkoumian, N. Effect of different stress path regimes on borehole instability in poorly cemented formations.
J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2016, 146, 30–49.
21. Mogi, K. Experimental Rock Mechanics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006.