Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/350023906
CITATIONS READS
19 584
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Retraction Note: Facile design of an ultra-thin broadband metamaterial absorber for C-band applications View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Fahad Ahmed on 15 March 2021.
1536-1225 (c) 2021 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Air University. Downloaded on March 15,2021 at 05:18:20 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/LAWP.2021.3065717, IEEE
Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
acts as an artificial magnetic conductor (AMC) for one Eigen- 𝑟𝑢𝑢 and 𝑟𝑣𝑣 . The simulations are performed for both the
polarization but as a PEC (perfect electric conductor) for the polarizations (u and v). The phase difference between u- and v-
orthogonal Eigen-polarization. As depicted in Fig.1 (b-c), if the polarized reflected components is achieved close to an odd
𝐸𝑖𝑢 and 𝐸𝑖𝑣 of a y-polarized impinging field, 𝑬𝒊 = 𝑦̂𝐸𝑖 𝑒 𝑖(𝑘𝑧+𝜔𝑡) at multiple of 90º within the frequency bands of 5.1-5.2 GHz, 5.6-
𝑧 = 0 (plane of metasurface), are reflected in-phase (0o) along 6.85 GHz, 8.8-11.2 GHz, and 14.9-20.2 GHz. As shown in Fig
u-axis and out of phase (180o) along –v-axis, then the sum 1, the magnitude and phase difference criterion is fulfilled in all
(vector) of these reflected fields is along the x-axis and hence the four above-mentioned bands, which confirm that the
the y-polarized wave transformed to x-polarized. reflected electric field is purely circularly polarized field.
To relate the above discussion with our proposed design, we B. Surface Current
simulate our proposed structure under u- and v- polarizations.
To get physical insight into the mechanism of polarization
As expected, Fig. 1 (b) and (c) show that magnitudes of both
conversion phenomenon, we need to discuss the distribution of
co-polarized components are equal i.e., |𝑅𝑢𝑢 | ≈ |𝑅𝑣𝑣 | and the
currents on the proposed structure for all the strong resonances.
phase difference is ∆𝜙 ≈ ±180° respectively. The equal
The incident EM field induces a current on the proposed
magnitude and 180o phase difference is responsible to rotate the structure that are coupled because of the anisotropy of the unit
reflected electromagnetic waves at the angle of 90o with respect cell through:
to incident electromagnetic waves in the frequency bands of 𝜶𝒆𝒆 𝜶𝒆𝒎 𝑬
𝑱
5.3-5.4 GHz, 7.2-8 GHz, and 12.3-13.76 GHz. [ ] = 𝑖⍵ [𝜶 𝜶𝒎𝒎 ] [𝑯] (5)
𝑴 𝒎𝒆
1536-1225 (c) 2021 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Air University. Downloaded on March 15,2021 at 05:18:20 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/LAWP.2021.3065717, IEEE
Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
The magnetic resonances occur at 5.35 GHz and 7.6 GHz while 2(d), the proposed metasurface shows multiband linear to
electric resonance at 13.03 GHz. At the resonance frequency, circular polarization conversion operation at frequencies from
the reported structure behaves as an artificial magnetic 5.1-5.2 GHz, 5.6-6.85 GHz, 8.8-11.2 GHz, 14.9-20.2 GHz.
conductor (AMC) for one component (reflect with 0 o phase)
and perfect reflector (PEC) for the other component (reflect
with 180o phase). Hence, the phase difference between the
reflected components is 180o, which, as discussed previously,
is responsible for the cross-polarization conversion [32].
1536-1225 (c) 2021 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Air University. Downloaded on March 15,2021 at 05:18:20 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/LAWP.2021.3065717, IEEE
Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
conversion ratio). The PCR is the ratio of reflected power in the V. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
cross-polarized component to the sum of power in both co- and To verify the simulation results, the proposed metasurface is
cross-polarized components; the mathematical formulation is printed on a 144×144×2.4 mm3 inexpensive FR4 lossy
given by, substrate. A continuous conducting sheet is used on one side to
2
|R𝑥𝑦 | avoid transmission while the unit cell is designed on the
PCR = 2 2 (3)
|R𝑥𝑦| +|R𝑦𝑦 |
opposite side of FR4 substrate. The experimental setup is
Fig. 5 (a) shows that the PCR for the proposed metasurface shown in Fig 7 (a). The prototype of the metasurface is shown
is above 90% over the desired frequency bands of 5.3-5.4, 7.2- in Fig 7(b). Owning to the limitations of measurement setup,
8, 12.3-13.76 GHz. However, the efficiency is approached to the measurements are carried out up to 16 GHz only. Horn
100% at two strong resonances of 7.7 and 13 GHz. antennas are placed side by side and connected with a vector
network analyser (VNA). One transmitting horn antenna
(vertical) is aligned with the receiving horn (vertical) to
measure co-polarized reflections. The y-polarized wave is
incident on the metasurface by transmitting antenna while y-
polarized wave (co-polarized) is received on receiving antenna.
(a) (b) The co-polarized reflections remain below -10 dB in the
frequency ranges of 5.3-5.4 GHz, 7.2-8 GHz and 12.3-13.76
GHz while close to -3 dB in four frequency bands of 5.1-5.2
Fig. 5. (a) Polarization conversion ratio (PCR) (b) Ellipticity of the GHz, 5.6-6.85 GHz, 8.8-11.2 GHz, and 14.9-16 GHz.
reflected wave. Similarly, to measure the cross-polarized reflections, the
To investigate the handedness of circular polarization, we use receiving antenna is placed orthogonal to the transmitting
antenna. The co-polarized reflections remain above -1 dB in the
Stokes parameters:
2 2 2 2
frequency ranges of 5.3-5.4 GHz, 7.2-8 GHz, and 12.3-13.76
𝑆0= |R 𝑦𝑦 | + |R 𝑥𝑦 | 𝑆1= |R 𝑦𝑦 | − |R 𝑥𝑦 | GHz while close to -3 dB in four frequency bands of 5.1-5.2
2 2 2 2
𝑆2= 2 |R 𝑦𝑦 | |R 𝑥𝑦 | cos△ ɸ 𝑆3= 2 |R 𝑦𝑦 | |R 𝑥𝑦 | sin△ ɸ (10) GHz, 5.6-6.85 GHz, 8.8-11.2 GHz, and 14.9-16 GHz. The
The normalized ellipticity is defined as e = S0/S3. measured results have good agreement with simulated results
Normalized ellipticity is +1 for the case of right-handed as shown in Fig 7 (c).
circularly polarized (RHCP) reflected wave and −1 when it is
left-handed circularly polarized (LHCP). It can be seen from
Fig. 5(b) that normalized ellipticity is +1 in the frequency bands
of 5.1-5.2 GHz, 5.6-6.85 GHz, 8.8-11.2 GHz, and 14.9-20.2
GHz, showing that the reflected wave is RHCP.
There are various applications, which require the stability of (a)
metasurface response when the EM wave is incident upon it
with different angles. The factors that play key role in angular
stability are smaller unit cell size, smaller dielectric thickness,
and unique unit cell geometry. The unit cell size and dielectric
thickness are kept lower while C-shaped unique geometric
configuration is chosen to attain maximum possible robustness (b) (c)
in the structure response to variations in incidence angle. To
verify the angular stability, numerical simulations are
performed by varying the theta from 0o to 75o. It can be noted Fig. 7. (a) Panoramic view of experimental setup (b) fabricated metasurface
(c) measurement results
from Fig. 6(a) that the reported structure is angularly stable up
to 75o for cross converter in the two frequency bands of 5.3-5.4
GHz, 7.2-8 GHz. Similarly, for circular conversion, the VI. CONCLUSION
structure manifests angular stability in the frequency bands of In this research, a multifunctional single-layered metasurface
5.1-5.2 GHz, 5.6-6.85 GHz, and 8.8-11.2 GHz up to 75o as is reported and experimentally tested in reflection mode. The
depicted in Fig. 6(b) proposed multifunctional metasurface operate as a highly
efficient cross polarizer at three frequency bands as well as
circular polarizer at four different frequency bands
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors acknowledge the support of Higher Education
(b) Commission (HEC) of Pakistan though National Research
(a) Program for Universities (NRPU) [Project No. 10070/Federal/
NRPU/R&D/HEC/ 2017].
Fig. 6. Response of the proposed design for different incidence angles (a)
PCR (b) Ellipticity
1536-1225 (c) 2021 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Air University. Downloaded on March 15,2021 at 05:18:20 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/LAWP.2021.3065717, IEEE
Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters
1536-1225 (c) 2021 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
View publication stats Authorized licensed use limited to: Air University. Downloaded on March 15,2021 at 05:18:20 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.