Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PRODUCT DECLARATION
KONE MonoSpace® 500 Registration number:
Published:
Valid until:
S-P-01062
2017-08-07
2020-04-10
Revision number: 1.0
KONE IN BRIEF
At KONE, our mission is to improve the flow of urban Our maintenance base covers over one million elevators
life. As a global leader in the elevator and escalator and escalators. Our key customer groups include builders,
industry, we provide elevators, escalators, and automatic building owners, facility managers, and developers. We also
building doors, as well as solutions for modernization and work closely with architects, authorities, and consultants.
maintenance that add value to buildings throughout their
life cycle. By enabling more effective People Flow ®, we make people’s
journeys safe, convenient, and reliable in taller, smarter
Our solutions move more than a billion people every buildings. In 2016, KONE had annual net sales of EUR 8.8
day. We serve more than 450,000 customers across the billion and employed more than 52,000 people.
globe, with the majority being maintenance customers.
Locations
We operate in more than 60 countries around the world, serving more than 400,000 customers. Headquartered in Helsinki, Finland,
we have eight centers and seven global production sites, as well as a worldwide network of authorized distributors.
KONE worldwide
2 3
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
PRODUCTS THAT The data for this Environmental Product as a guideline in the calculation process.
OF URBAN LIFE
KONE MonoSpace 500 elevator. Product specified in the PCR. The information refers
Category Rules of Lifts (Elevators) Product to a typical configuration representative of
classification: UN CPC 4354 according to the complete range of parameters.
ISO 14025 (PCR 2015) (“PCR”) was used
PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS
A GLOBAL INNOVATOR
Table 1. Mandatory information required for the specification of the product.
At KONE, our vision is to deliver the best People Flow
®
In 2016, KONE was ranked as one
experience. This means we make sure that the people who Index Values Representative values
of the top 100 most innovative
chosen in case of
use our products and services – the residents of towns and companies in the world in a list
declaration of ranges
cities – can move around more easily, more effectively, and complied by business magazine
Type of installation New generic lift
have more enjoyable experiences. Our job is to help make the Forbes. KONE was included for the
Commercial name KONE MonoSpace® 500
world’s cities, buildings, and public spaces better places for sixth consecutive year and was the
Main purpose Transport of passengers
everyone by improving the flow of urban life. only elevator and escalator company
Type of lift Electric
to make the list in 2016.
Type of drive system Gearless traction
by KONE is aligned with the typical [tkm] as defined in the PCR. The results for phase. This is the first time a Swedish
¡¡avoiding the use of hazardous substances shopping center project has achieved
service life data published by elevator the complete service lifetime of the elevator
an Excellent rating, and the Mall of
¡¡maximizing material durability, recycled content, and manufacturers. Regarding technological were also calculated for an elevator with a
Scandinavia is one of only a handful of
recyclability innovations, market transformation is lifetime of 25 years, installed in a 5 floors
shopping center projects in Europe to
¡¡minimizing water consumption usually slow, as elevators are products with building, and a traveling distance of 12 m. have done so.
a long service lifetime. For elevators, it The number of trips per day was 125, which
The Mall of Scandinavia features
may take up to 20–30 years before major was obtained from Annex A, table A.1, ISO
THE GREEN HEART OF YOUR BUILDING – retrofitting is necessary. (Sachs, Harvey M. 25745-2. The annual electricity consumption
several KONE solutions, including
KONE MonoSpace 500 elevators.
KONE MONOSPACE® 500 (2005): Opportunities for Elevator Energy was 534 kWh and the functional unit 317
“KONE is at the forefront of energy
Efficiency Improvements, ACEEE) tkm.
efficiency,” says Jaakko Kaivonen,
The KONE MonoSpace 500, our current machine-room-less
Managing Director of KONE
volume elevator, is up to 90% more energy efficient than The functional unit for the study is defined The energy efficiency information is
Scandinavia. “The MonoSpace
the elevators we manufactured in the 1990s. This is possible as the transportation of a load over based on a third-party report on a KONE
elevators installed at the mall improve
because of the energy efficient KONE EcoDisc® hoisting distance, expressed in tonne [t] over a MonoSpace 500 elevator installed at
on our already industry-leading energy
machine, a highly efficient drive, enhanced standby solutions, customer reference location in Finland.
consumption by a further 35%,”
and LED lighting. he adds.
4 5
5
TOP-CLASS ENERGY EFFICIENCY OUR LIFE-CYCLE APPROACH
We are a pioneer in developing
Our business model is based on a life-cycle approach. This means that we provide value The data used for raw material and energy production and modes of transportation in this
eco-efficient solutions in the elevator
and escalator industry. In 2014 we for our customers every step of the way, for the entire lifespan of their building. We offer Life Cycle Assessment were from Ecoinvent v3.2 with “allocation, cut-off by classification”.
were the first company to achieve an innovative and sustainable new equipment solutions, ensure the safety and availability of The MonoSpace® 500 modules and the representative components in each functional group
A-class energy efficiency classification equipment in operation, and offer modernization solutions for aging equipment. are listed below together with their production locations and life cycle stages according to
according to the new international the PCR.
standard ISO 25745 – Energy The life cycle stages used in this study are listed below:
performance of lifts, escalators, and
moving walks. Upstream Core Downstream Life cycle stage C-2 inhouse manufacturing
Raw material Transport Outsourced In-house Transport and Use End-of-life Manufacturing Finland Italy Italy/Finland
In 2016, we extended the classification
supply manufacturing manufacturing Installation (Operation) treatment country
coverage of our product range
U-1 Materials U-2 U-3 Out C-1 Own D-1 Transport D-3 D-5 Waste Module Module 1 Module 7 Module 8 Module 9 Module 6
according to the ISO 25745 standard. manufacturing Transport to sourced materials from Maintenance processing Machinery Electrical systems Signalization, Door Car
KONE E MonoSpace and KONE manufacturing manufacturing manufacturing manufacturing 5 floors 1,100 x 1,400 x
Z MiniSpace™ elevators achieved site to building 1,200 mm
A-class classification in addition to site
ten elevators classified earlier. All C-2 In-house D-2 D-4 Energy D-6 Disposal
manufacturing Installation consumption
Life cycle stage U-3 Outsourced manufacturing
the ratings have been granted and
Manufacturing Czech Republic/ Czech Republic Austria Italy/Poland
measurements made by external third
country Italy
parties at customer reference locations.
Module Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 Module 10 Module 5
In addition, KONE is the first elevator Guide rail Shaft equipment Slings and Door operator, Filler bit
company to offer a volume elevator Figure 1. KONE MonoSpace 500® life cycle stages 630 kg, 1.0 m/s 630 kg, 1.0 m/s safeties normal operator 630 kg, 1.0 m/s
range with a VDI 4707 A-class energy 630 kg, 1.0 m/s
efficiency rating.
The biggest environmental impact of Upstream The elevator in this study is in use in Brussels, Belgium. The Belgian average mix of energy
our solutions stems from the amount
ter
was used when calculating emissions resulting from energy consumption during the use
of electricity elevators and escalators Raw ma ial and
use over their lifetime. This underlines transportation Co stage. The maintenance stage includes rope replacement. For the KONE MonoSpace 500,
the importance of focusing on energy e m I the typical rope replacement interval is eight (8) years, meaning it is expected that the ropes
re
an
nt
f
n- fact
efficiency innovations.
ho uri
tre d of
u
e
us ng
En
ELEVATORS 500
D isa ss e m
8,000
bly
ea
Tra
7,000
6,000 M
od d
ern a n ce
iz at U se nan
io n nt e
5,000 m ai
am
4,000 wnstre
Do
3,000
2,000
1,000
6 7
6
Inorganic materials, 24.3%
Inorganic materials, 24.3%
100%
Non-ferrous metals, 1.0%
Non-ferrous metals, 1.0%
CONTENT DECLARATION
Material summary of packaging of a Material summary of a KONE corporate head offices
KONE MonoSpace 500 unit MonoSpace 500 unit and our manufacturing and R&D sites
in Finland, Italy, and the Netherlands
Material
Material summary summary packaging
packaging Material summary
Material summary is produced from renewable
sources. Many of our other country
0.1% 0.1% 3.3% 0.1% 3.3% 0.1%
organizations also purchase renewable
energy, and we have some onsite
17.1% 17.1%
renewable energy production in the
The table below shows a material summary of the elevator studied, as delivered Material
Materialandsummary
installed a summary
inof packagingof packaging 5.6% 5.6% 29.2% 29.2% US, Italy, Norway, Finland, and China.
MonoSpace MonoSpace
building and handed over to a customer. The summary is calculated from data provided by KONE.
500 500
Table 2. Material summary of KONE MonoSpace® 500 as one unit of product (excluding spare parts and 77.3% 77.3% 0.6% 0.6%
65.5% 65.5% 0%
packaging) and as a full life cycle (including spare parts and packaging)* 1.2% 1.2% landfill waste at our
manufacturing units
MonoSpace 500, MonoSpace 500, Full Life Cycle, Full Life Cycle, in China, the Czech
[kg] [w-%] [kg] [w-%] 0.1% 0.1% 2.8% 0.1% 2.8% 0.1% Republic, Finland, India, Italy, the
Ferrous metals (zinc-coated steel, stainless steel, 1760 65.50% 1910 59.00% Netherlands, and AllenPlace in the US.
cold rolled steel, cast iron, NdFeB magnet) 16.7% 16.7% 11.7% 11.7%
This figure describes the material composition of the elevator. The recycled material content of incoming materials
SOLAR PANELS INSTALLED AT
could not be specified by KONE and its suppliers.
NORWAY HEAD OFFICE
Our Norway head office in Oslo
Table 3. Material summary of packaging of KONE MonoSpace 500 for one unit of product (excluding
moved into a passive energy
spare parts and packaging) and as a full life cycle (including spare parts and packaging)*.
PRODUCT MATERIAL CONTENT building in 2012. The solar panels
were installed in May 2016, and
MonoSpace 500, MonoSpace 500, Full Life Cycle, Full Life Cycle,
The KONE MonoSpace 500 elevator is mainly composed of steel and concrete. they produce around 40,000 kWh
[kg] [w-%] [kg] [w-%]
The product does not contain: annually, which equals to 20% of
Cardboard 67.3 17.10% 67.3 16.70%
Wood, 77.3% Wood, 77.3%
Metals, 0.1% Metals, 0.1% Wood, 77.2% Wood, 77.2%
Metals, 0.1% Metals, 0.1% electricity consumption of all lighting
Metals 0.5 0.10% 0.5 0.10% ¡¡asbestos in the building. The KONE Oslo head
Plastic (PE-LD) 17.9 4.50%
Plastics, 5.6% 19.9
Plastics,
Cardboard, 4.9017.1%
5.6% 17.1%Cardboard, Plastics, 5.9% Plastics, 5.9% 16.7%Cardboard, 16.7%
Cardboard, office is currently one of the most
¡¡paints containing lead or cadmium pigments
Plastic (PET) 1.5 0.40% 1.5 0.40% energy efficient buildings in Norway.
Plastic (PS) 2.6 0.70% 2.6 0.60% ¡¡plastics containing cadmium stabilizers
Plywood 29 7.40% 29 7.20%
¡¡capacitors containing PCBs or PCTs
Wood 275 69.90% 281 70.00%
Total 394 100% 402 100% ¡¡ozone-depleting substances such as CFCs
¡¡chlorinated solvents
*Actual figures may differ due to rounding.
¡¡mercury in other components than lighting
8 9
9
The life cycle inventory provides a list of energy recources, secondary materials or energy and recovered energy flows
emissions, wastes, and raw materials for the whole life cycle were not available (marked N.A. in the following tables). The
of the product. The assumptions for resource use calculations use of resources is reported in the following tables per entire
are presented in the MonoSpace® 500 LCA report. Data for elevator life cycle and per tkm.
Table 4. The use of resources per entire elevator life cycle in usage category 2 Table 5. The use of resources per tkm in usage category 2
Non-renewable Non-renewable Renewable Renewable Secondary Secondary Recovered Non-renewable Non-renewable Renewable Renewable Secondary Secondary Recovered
energy material energy material energy material energy [MJ] energy material energy material energy material energy [MJ]
resources resources resources resources resources [MJ] resources [kg] ***** resources resources resources resources resources [MJ] resources [kg] *****
(energy) [MJ] (materials) [kg] (energy) [MJ] (materials) [kg] *** **** (energy) [MJ] (materials) [kg] (energy) [MJ] (materials) [kg] *** ****
U-1 Materials 8.33E+04 5.15E+03 7.71E+03 5.88E+02 N.A. 8.91E+02 N.A. U-1 Materials 2.63E+02 1.62E+01 2.43E+01 1.85E+00 N.A. 2.81E+00 N.A.
manufacturing manufacturing
U-2 Transport to 2.25E+03 9.19E+01 2.42E+01 1.87E+00 N.A. N.A. N.A. U-2 Transport to 7.10E+00 2.90E-01 7.63E-02 5.89E-03 N.A. N.A. N.A.
manufacturing site manufacturing
U-3 Outsourced 7.79E+01 3.81E-01 1.28E+01 7.21E-01 1.16E-01 N.A. N.A. site
manufacturing U-3 Outsourced 2.46E-01 1.20E-03 4.02E-02 2.28E-03 3.66E-04 N.A. N.A.
C-1 Own materials - - - - - - - manufacturing
manufacturing C-1 Own - - - - - - -
C-2 In-house 4.43E+03 2.59E+01 1.66E+03 1.23E+02 2.03E+01 N.A. 0.00E+00 materials
manufacturing manufacturing
D-1 Transport from 1.07E+04 7.96E+02 1.15E+04 1.61E+03 N.A. 2.55E-01 N.A. C-2 In-house 1.40E+01 8.18E-02 5.23E+00 3.89E-01 6.41E-02 N.A. 0.00E+00
manufacturing to manufacturing
building site D-1 Transport 3.36E+01 2.51E+00 3.63E+01 5.09E+00 N.A. 8.03E-04 N.A.
D-2 Installation 2.50E+03 8.62E+01 6.63E+01 8.44E+00 1.26E+00 N.A. N.A. from
manufacturing to
D-3 Maintenance 3.79E+03 1.25E+02 1.33E+02 1.62E+01 5.57E+00 N.A. N.A.
building site
D-4 Energy 4.83E+04 2.72E+02 1.05E+04 1.06E+03 1.12E+03 N.A N.A
D-2 Installation 7.87E+00 2.72E-01 2.09E-01 2.66E-02 3.97E-03 N.A. N.A.
consumption
D-3 Maintenance 1.20E+01 3.95E-01 4.19E-01 5.11E-02 1.76E-02 N.A. N.A.
D-5 Waste 1.06E+03 4.36E+01 1.65E+01 1.35E+00 N.A. N.A. N.A.
processing D-4 Energy 1.52E+02 8.58E-01 3.30E+01 3.35E+00 3.53E+00 N.A. N.A.
consumption
D-6 Disposal ** ** ** ** ** ** **
D-5 Waste 3.35E+00 1.38E-01 5.20E-02 4.27E-03 N.A. N.A. N.A.
Total life cycle 1.56E+05 6.59E+03 3.16E+04 3.42E+03 1.15E+03 8.91E+02 0.00E+00
processing
D-6 Disposal ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Total life cycle 4.93E+02 2.08E+01 9.96E+01 1.08E+01 3.62E+00 2.81E+00 0.00E+00
The potential environmental impacts studied in this In recent years, the energy consumption of elevators ***Secondary energy resources include only the amount of waste incineration in each country where electricity is used directly. The energy consumption within the Ecoinvent LCI
datasets is not considered. The rest of the life cycle stages cannot be defined with full certainty. They are thus marked as not available (N.A.)
case were defined by the PCR. The impact assessment in the use stage has been actively reduced as a result
****Secondary material resources consider only the amount of iron scrap and copper scrap that are used for steel production, copper production, or cast iron production. Other
method used was CML 2001 and the impact classes were of development work by KONE, so the results can also
possible secondary material uses could not be found from the Ecoinvent LCI datasets. They are thus marked as not available (N.A.)
global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential be seen as reasonable in this sense. D-1 Transport from
*****Possible recovered energy is not reported in the Ecoinvent LCI datasets. There is no recovered energy in KONE's own processes in C-2, In house manufacturing. The rest of
(AP), eutrophication potential (EP), photochemical ozone manufacturing to building site stage created 5–7% the life cycle stages cannot be defined with full certainty. They are thus marked as not available (N.A.)
creation potential (POCP), and abiotic depletion potential of GWP and ADP of fossil fuels. The rest of the life
(ADP) of elements and fossil fuels. The biggest share of cycle stages were of minor importance. It is important
impacts was created in the U-1 Materials manufacturing to bear in mind that the results of different impact
stage, which created approximately half of GWP and categories cannot be compared in this study since the
ADP of fossil fuels, and 84–88% of AP, EP, and POCP in calculation was performed on a midpoint level that aims
Usage category 2 (UC2). 99% of the ADP of elements was to illustrate the potential environmental impacts. Thus
created within the U-1 Materials manufacturing stage. it cannot be said that e.g. the result of climate change
The D-4 Energy consumption stage was the second most is more important than the result of acidification or
important life cycle stage, creating c. 30% of GWP and eutrophication in this study.
ADP of fossil fuels in UC2, and c. 10% of AP, EP, and POCP.
10 11
Table 6: Potential environmental impacts per entire life cycle
ENVIRONMENTAL
U-1 Materials 6.20E+03 7.08E+01 3.10E+01 3.46E+00 7.58E-01 8.79E+04
manufacturing
U-2 Transport to 1.60E+02 7.00E-01 1.00E-01 3.00E-02 0.00E+00 2.34E+03
IMPACT
manufacturing site
U-3 Outsourced 5.06E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.70E+01
%
manufacturing
C-1 Own materials - - - - - -
manufacturing
C-2 In-house 3.78E+02 1.40E+00 3.00E-01 6.00E-02 0.00E+00 3.50E+03
In the LCA, impact 8,000
assessment method CML 2001 and manufacturing
its related characterization factors were employed at the D-1 Transport from 6.63E+02 2.70E+00 7.00E-01 1.40E-01 1.00E-03 1.11E+04
7,000
manufacturing to
midpoint level as requested in the PCR (Environdec 2015,
building site
6,000
version 1.0), i.e. without normalization and weighting.
D-2 Installation 1.79E+02 6.00E-01 2.00E-01 4.00E-02 2.00E-03 2.60E+03
Selected environmental
5,000
impact categories for this study
D-3 Maintenance 2.73E+02 9.00E-01 3.00E-01 7.00E-02 3.00E-03 3.95E+03
were global warming (CML 2001, August 2016 version,
D-4 Energy 3.44E+03 6.40E+00 2.50E+00 3.30E-01 2.00E-03 5.10E+04
IPCC 2013 100 year horizon), acidification (CML 2001
4,000
consumption
non-baseline, August 2016 version), eutrophication (CML D-5 Waste processing 7.45E+01 3.00E-01 1.00E-01 1.00E-02 0.00E+00 1.11E+03
3,000
2001 baseline, August 2016 version), photochemical D-6 Disposal* * * * * * *
ozone creation (CML 2,0002001, baseline, high NOx, August
Total life cycle 1.14E+04 8.39E+01 3.51E+01 4.15E+00 7.67E-01 1.64E+05
2016 version), abiotic depletion of elements (CML 2001,
1,000
baseline, August 2016 version), and abiotic depletion of
0
fossil fuels (CML 2001, baseline, August 2016 version).
The results of the environmental
90s impact
1996 Current are
assessment
2008
KONE KONE KONE KONE
divided by life cycle stage per Mono-
elevators entire life cycleMono-
Mono- (Table 6) Table 7: Potential environmental impacts per tkm
Space Space Space
and per tkm (Table 7). The share of each lifetechnology
cycle step is
presented in Figure 2, below. GWP 100a AP EP POCP ADP elements ADP fossil fuel
U-1 Materials 1.96E+01 2.23E-01 9.78E-02 1.09E-02 2.39E-03 2.77E+02
manufacturing
Figure 2: The environmental impact share of each life cycle stage U-2 Transport to 5.03E-01 2.21E-03 3.15E-04 9.46E-05 0.00E+00 7.39E+00
described in Figure 1. manufacturing site
U-3 Outsourced 1.59E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.11E-01
100 manufacturing
Upstream total 2.01E+01 2.25E-01 9.81E-02 1.10E-02 2.39E-03 2.85E+02
C-1 Own materials - - - - - -
manufacturing
80
C-2 In-house 1.19E+00 4.42E-03 9.46E-04 1.89E-04 0.00E+00 1.10E+01
manufacturing
Core total 1.19E+00 4.42E-03 9.46E-04 1.89E-04 0.00E+00 1.10E+01
60
D-1 Transport from 2.09E+00 8.52E-03 2.21E-03 4.42E-04 3.15E-06 3.50E+01
manufacturing to
building site
12 13
VEHICLE FLEET WASTE PRODUCTION
Our global vehicle fleet is one of the
biggest contributors to our operational
As with resource use, data on the amount of with an assumed material loss of 5%. The
greenhouse gas emissions, so we are waste disposed were not available (marked waste from D-2 Installation describes the
continuously searching for new and N.A. in the following tables) from the packaging materials, which can be recycled
innovative ways to reduce the carbon Ecoinvent LCI datasets. The calculations or incinerated, but since KONE prefers
footprint of our fleet. We have been of waste flows are therefore based on recycling, that process is not included in
further exploring the use of alternative information collected from KONE only, the study as recommended in the PCR.
fuels and aim to shift from fuel cars i.e. specific data. The average data from Finally, the waste from D-5 waste processing
to electric cars as soon as the leasing Ecoinvent is marked as N.A. The amount describes the elevator components and
contract renewal periods allow and the of waste produced during the life cycle is materials that are recycled in accordance
infrastructure needed is in place in the
shown in Table 8 per entire life cycle and with KONE’s instructions. However, the
different countries where we operate.
in Table 9 per tkm. The waste from D-1 lubricants (1.0 kg in Table 2) and batteries
Transport from manufacturing to building (2.46 kg in Table 2) are reported as
site represents the material losses from the hazardous waste in the tables below.
production processes of packaging materials
Table 8. Waste production and output flows per entire life cycle
14 15
14
PROGRAM-RELATED APPENDICES
KONE A WORLD LEADER IN CDP MEMBERSHIPS AND
2016 CLIMATE CHANGE REPORTING POSITIONS OF TRUST
INFORMATION AND
2016 marks the KONE is an active participant in
second year organizations developing codes,
VERIFICATION
KONE has earned standards, and guidelines for
a place on the A improving safety, accessibility, and
List – this year as energy efficiency, as well as other
one of the only organizations advancing sustainable
193 companies development. In 2016, KONE
from thousands continued to be a member or joined
of others the following organizations:
independently assessed against CDP’s Program: The International EPD® System GLOSSARY ¡¡ United Nations Global Compact
scoring methods. The company’s
EPD International AB Abiotic depletion potential (ADP) ISO 25745
score has risen for seven consecutive ¡¡ The International Organization for
Box 210 60 Expressed in kg antimony (Sb) eq. for non-fossil resources and ISO 25745-2:2015 specifies a method of estimating energy
years. The Climate A List comprises SE-100 31 Stockholm in MJ for fossil resources. In the CML method the non-fossil consumption based on measured values, calculation, or Standardization (ISO)
companies from around the world that Sweden resources include e.g. silver, gold, copper, lead, zinc, and simulation on an annual basis for traction, hydraulic, and
¡¡ Standardization Administration of
aluminum. positive drive elevators on a single-unit basis, and an energy
have been identified as leaders in their classification system for new, existing, and modernized China (SAC)
www.environdec.com Acidification potential (AP)
efforts and actions to combat climate traction, hydraulic, and positive drive elevators on a single-unit
EPD registration number: S-P-01062 Chemical alternation of the environment, resulting in ¡¡ The European Committee for
change during the past CDP reporting basis.
hydrogen ions being produced more rapidly than they are Standardization (CEN)
year. The Climate A List constitutes the Published: 2017-08-07 dispersed or neutralized; occurs mainly through fallout of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
baseline for corporate climate action sulfur and nitrogen compounds from combustion processes. LCA is a method that quantifies the total environment impact ¡¡ International Trade Associations,
Valid until: 2020-04-10
Acidification can be harmful to terrestrial and aquatic life. of products or activities over their entire life cycle and life such as the European Lift
and includes companies identified as cycle thinking. Life cycle assessment is based on ISO 14040
Product Category Rules: PCR 2015 Product Category Rules According to ISO 14025. Lifts (Elevators)
leaders in the transition towards a low- CML Impact Assessment Method and ISO 14044 standards and comprises four phases: goal Association (ELA), the Pacific Asia
Product classification: UN CPC 4354. Version 1.0
The CML methodology is based on midpoint modeling and scope definition, inventory data collection and analysis, Lift and Escalator Association
carbon economy. Product group classification: UN CPC 4354 (problem-oriented method). Pollutants are allocated to impact environmental impact assessment, and interpretation of (PALEA), and the National
categories. results. The results of LCA are used in communication and
During 2016, KONE also received Reference year for data: 2015-2016
product development purposes, for example. Elevator Industry, Inc. (NEII) in
recognition as a leading supplier for Environmental Product Declaration (EPD)
Geographical scope: Europe An EPD provides numerical data about a product’s North America
action on climate change and was Life Cycle Inventory (LCI)
environmental performance and facilitates comparison The phase of life cycle assessment involving the compilation ¡¡ World Business Council for
recognized on the new global CDP between different products with the same function. KONE and quantification of inputs and outputs for a product system
Product category rules (PCR): PCR 2015 Product Category Rules According to ISO 14025. Lifts (Elevators) EPDs are based on life cycle assessments. Sustainable Development
Supplier A List. throughout its life cycle.
Product classification: UN CPC 4354. 2015:05. Version 1.0 (WBCSD)
Eutrophication Potential (EP) Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA)
PCR review was conducted by: "The Technical Committee of the International EPD® System. The enrichment of bodies of water by nitrates and phosphates ¡¡ Green building councils in the
The phase of life cycle assessment aimed at understanding and
Review chair: Maurizio Fieschi. from organic material or the surface run-off; increases the evaluating the magnitude and significance of the potential United States, Finland, India,
Contact via info@environdec.com. growth rate of aquatic plants and can produce algal blooms environmental impacts of a product system throughout the
that deoxygenate water and smother other aquatic life. Italy, Romania, Singapore, the
Independent verification of the EPD Process certification (internal) life cycle of the product.
Netherlands, Sweden, Vietnam,
declaration and data, according to EPD Verification (external) Exponential notation (E) Product Category Rules (PCR)
ISO 14025:2006: A way of writing numbers that accommodates values too and the Czech Republic
Product Category Rules (PCR) define the rules and
large or small to be conveniently written in standard decimal requirements for EPDs of a certain product category. They
Third party verifier: Panu Pasanen, Bionova Ltd. ¡¡ World Alliance of Low Carbon
notation, e.g. 7.21E-04 kg is equal to 0.000721 kg. are a key part of ISO 14025 as they enable transparency and
Accredited by: Approved by the International EPD System
®
comparability between EPDs. Cities (WALCC)
Functional unit
The quantified performance of a product system for use as a Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP) ¡¡ European Round Table of
reference unit.
CONTACT INFORMATION The index used to translate the level of emissions of various Industrialists’ Energy and Climate
Global Warming Potential (GWP100) gases into a common measurement in order to enable
EPD owner: KONE Corporation Change Working Group (ERT)
The index used to translate the level of emissions of various comparison their contributions to the change in ground-level
gases into a common measurement in order to enable ozone concentration. Photochemical ozone creation potentials ¡¡ Cleantech Finland
Corporate Offices are calculated as the change that would result from the
comparison of their contributions to the absorption by the
Keilasatama 3 atmosphere of infrared radiation. Greenhouse gases are emission of 1kg of a gas to that from the emission of 1 kg of ¡¡ Climate Leadership Council and
P.O. Box 7 converted to CO2 equivalents with GWP factors, using factors ethylene. Smart & Clean foundation
FI-02150 Espoo for a 100-year interval (GWP100).
Finland ¡¡ Council on Tall Buildings and
Urban Habitat (CTBUH)
In 2016, KONE created externally
www.kone.com
verified Environmental Product
LCA author: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT) REFERENCES ¡¡ FIBS Finnish corporate
Declarations for all our 11 building responsibility network
General Programme Instructions of the International EPD® System. Version 2.5.
door models, published on P.O. Box 1000
www. ibu-epd.com. FI-02044 VTT PCR 2015 Product Category Rules According to ISO 14025. Lifts (Elevators) Product classification: UN CPC 4354. Version 1.0.
Finland
Ecoinvent 2016. Ecoinvent 3.2. Swiss Centre of Life Cycle Inventories. Commercial database. Access to data requires a license.
Institut Bauen und Umwelt (IBU) is the
Available: http://www.ecoinvent.ch/. [Accessed on 16.08.2016].
program operator for building door www.vtt.fi
Source: Sachs, Harvey M. (2005): Opportunities for Elevator Energy Efficiency Improvements, ACEEE.
EPDs. Program operator: EPD International AB
KONE Sustainability Report 2016.
info@environdec.com
Comparability: EPDs are not comparative assertions and are either not comparable or have limited comparability when they cover
different life cycle stages, are based on different product category rules, or are missing relevant environmental impacts. EPDs
within the same product category but from different programmes may not be comparable.
16 17
16 17
Figure 3. Flowsheet of KONE MonoSpace 500 in entire life cycle
Polyethylene
Nylon 6-6
Electricity Polycarbonate
Synthetic rubber Lubricating oil Lubricating oil Zinc coated steel Polyurethane Polyurethane Aluminium, rolled Zinc coated steel Synthetic rubber
Polypropylene Zinc coated steel Polyurethane Lubricating oil Polypropylene Polypropylene Zinc coated steel Concrete Cromium steel Installation Transport Electricity
Module 4
Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 3 Module 4 Module 4 Module 5 Module 6
Shaft comps, ladder,
Hoisting machine Guide rails Brackets, buffers, etc. Ropes Car sling Counterweight frame Filler weights Car Use Electricity
parking plate
PVC Surface resistor Metal film resistor Polycarbonate Nylon 6 Electricity Aluminium Plywood
Disassembly
Magnet Glass diode Electrolyte capacitor ABS Synthetic rubber Nylon 6 Nylon 6-6 Corrugated board
Nylon 6-6 Surface transistor Film capacitor Nylon 6 Zinc coated steel Polystyrene Cast iron PET
End of life treatment Transport
Polyethylene LED High voltage transformer Polyethylene Aluminium Aluminium Cold rolled steel Polystyrene
Copper Capacitor Glass diode PVC Electricity Zinc coated steel Electricity Polyethylene
Lead Integrated logic circuit Wirewound resistor Synthetic rubber Polyurethane Wood
Zinc coated steel Ring core inductor Wired transistor Zinc coated steel Copper Cold rolled steel
Polypropylene Electric connector Printed wiring board Stainless steel Synthetic rubber Transport
18 19
KONE provides innovative and eco-efficient
solutions for elevators, escalators, automatic
building doors and the systems that integrate
them with today’s intelligent buildings.
KONE CORPORATION
Corporate Offices
Keilasatama 3
P.O. Box 7
FI-02150 Espoo
Finland
www.kone.com
This publication is for general informational purposes only and we reserve the right at any time to alter the product design and specifications. No statement this publication contains shall be construed as a
warranty or condition, express or implied, as to any product, its fitness for any particular purpose, merchantability, quality or representation of the terms of any purchase agreement. Minor differences between
printed and actual colors may exist. KONE MonoSpace®, KONE EcoDisc®, KONE Care® and People Flow® are registered trademarks of KONE Corporation. Copyright © 2017 KONE Corporation.
8416