Analysis of T-Beams

Effective Width of flange:

3
C max= d a max=β 1 Cmax
s s L 7
Least of: b w +16 h ,b w + w1 + w 2 , bw + n
2 2 4 800−f y
∅=0.65+0.25
Mu=1.2 M D +1.6 M L , 1000−f y

ØM nmax =Ø C 1 y1 + Ø C2 y 2

if ≥ , design as Singly Reinforced ØM nmax < Mu , design as Doubly Reinforced

Case 1: a<t Case 2: a≥t Assume Ø = 0.90 Compression Steel Yields Compression Steel Does Not Yield

,
if fs ≥ 1000 MPa, tension controlled,
assumption is ok!
if fs < 1000 MPa, transition region

(compression steel does not

yield)

under Doubly Reinforced T beam

 One-Way Slab Design

Minimum Thickness of One-Way Slab

L L
Simply Supported :hmin= One end Continuous :hmin=
20 24

fy
for fy> 420 MPa , multiply (0.4 + )
700

d=h−concrete cover – ½ d b

wu=1.2 w D +1.6 w L

51 3
Check: Mu=∅
140
( β 1 f c ) b d required (1− β1 )
' 2
14
if d ≥ d required , slabthickness isadequate

2
Mu=∅ R n b d

Main bar: Temperature bar:

A S=ρbd A S=ρmin bd

A ¯¿ A ¯¿
s= x 1000 ¿ , s= x 1000 ¿ ,
AS AS
s ≤ 3h, 450 mm s ≤ 3h, 450 mm

Dalumangcad, Magarang, Salaug

 Analysis of T-Beams (Designing)

Effective Width of flange:

s w1 s w 2 Ln
Least of: b w +16 h ,b w + + , bw +
2 2 4

Mu=1.2 M D +1.6 M L ,

3
C max= d a max=β 1 Cmax
7

800−f y
∅=0.65+0.25
1000−f y

ØM nmax =Ø C 1 y1 + Ø C2 y 2

if ≥ , design as Singly Reinforced ØM nmax < Mu , design as Doubly Reinforced

Case 1: a<t Case 2: a≥t Assume Ø = 0.90

T =C
'
(
f s= 600
d−c
c ) ,

A s f y =0.85 f c AC if fs ≥ 1000 MPa, tension controlled,

assumption is ok!
if fs < 1000 MPa, transition region

T =C 1+C 2
' '
A s f y =0.85 f c A1 +0.85 f c A 2

Dalumangcad, Racquel

Magarang, Ibtizaam Dayandra

Salaug, Kathryn BJ