Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/762659?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Human Rights Quarterly
Ann Kent*
1. INTRODUCTION
The outbreak of peaceful protest in China from April to June 1989 has serv
to highlight lacunae in the existing Western literature on human right
China, both in a definitional and methodological sense. In terms of t
definition of "human rights," the emphasis of Western scholars on the con
dition of China's civil and political rights to the exclusion of its social a
economic rights has led to two main consequences. First, in the decade after
1978 China had made considerable informal progress in the condition
the freedoms of thought, speech, association and assembly. Thus, in
realm of public policy, objection to the limited extension of those righ
seemed grudging and inappropriate, although at the same time Amnes
International pressured China to legally protect those newfound rights
addressed the problem of capital punishment in China.
Nevertheless, many observers, particularly foreign governments, to
refuge in the expectation that it would just be a matter of time before
improvements in the informal situation of civil and political rights in Chin
would penetrate the formal legal apparatus of rights, particularly in view o
the leadership's pledge to institute a rule of law. Those who did critic
China's civil rights often objected to the Chinese practice on human rig
issues canvassed in more advanced Western nations, such as birth cont
the lack of free choice of work and freedom of movement, and proper
* In writing this article I have benefited from discussions with Philip Alston, Peter Bail
and J.P. Fonteyne, Faculty of Law, Australian National University, Canberra, and from
comments on an earlier draft by James Cotton and Chris Buckley, Research School
Pacific Studies, Australian National University. This paper was originally delivered at t
Asian Studies of Australia conference in July 1990.
Human Rights Quarterly 13 (1991) 170-201 c 1991 by The Johns Hopkins University Pr
1. Ann Kent, Human Rights in the People's Republic of China: National and Internationa
Dimensions (Canberra: Peace Research Center, Australian National University, 1990) 2,
67.
2. Eugene Kamenka, "Human Rights, Peoples' Rights," Bulletin of the Australian Society of
Legal Philosophy 9 (June 1985): 157.
3. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed 10 Dec. 1948, G.A. Res. 217A (111), U.N.
Doc. A/810, at 71 (1948); International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted
16 Dec. 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976, G.A. Res. 2200 (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR,
Supp. (No. 16) 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966).
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art. 25.
There are various ways of assessing the condition of human rights in China.
One method is to apply a model of human rights based on the Universal
Declaration and its covenants to China's actual situation of human rights.
This is the approach adopted by a number of scholars.19 But perhaps the
most useful methodology is a two-step process that involves first a com-
parison between international standards of human rights and national norms,
most accurately reflected in a state's constitution or constitutions. Only when
the gap between internationally prescribed ideals and national legislation
has been explored should the second step be initiated: an examination of
the relationship between the constitutionally guaranteed principles and
changing empirical reality.20 This approach has the virtue of accurately
Hungda Chiu, "Chinese Attitudes toward International Law of Human Rights in the Post-
Mao Era," in Chinese Politics from Mao to Deng, Victor C. Falkenheim and Ilpyong J.
Kim, eds. (New York: Paragon, 1989), 237-70.
19. This approach has been generally followed by Yuan-li Wu et al., Human Rights in the
People's Republic of China (Boulder, Co.: Westview Press, 1988) and in Copper, Michael,
and Wu, note 13 above, although reference is made to Chinese constitutional provisions.
It has also been followed in James Seymour, China Rights Annals: Human Rights De-
velopments in the People's Republic of China from October 1983 through September
1984 (New York: M.E. Sharpe, 1985).
20. This is the methodology adopted in R. Randle Edwards, Louis Henkin, and Andrew Nathan,
Human Rights in Contemporary China (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986) but
these authors give greater emphasis to the comparison between national and international
norms via comparisons with the Chinese constitutions, and less to the charting of the
informal exercise of those rights. It is also adopted in James Seymour, "Human Rights
and the Law in the People's Republic of China," in Falkenheim and Kim, note 18 above,
271-97.
21. For this reason, the emphasis in this paper is on the rights of Han Chinese, rather
on the related issue of Tibetan and minority rights.
The remarkable feature about China's four constitutions since 1949 is that,
despite their changing character, they have shared an unchanging commit-
ment to civil and political rights, as well as to social, economic, and cultural
rights. Over time, some civil and political rights have been added and some
subtracted, but a feature of continuity in all of the constitutions has been
the pledge of respect for the freedoms of speech, correspondence, press,
assembly, association, procession, and demonstration, and freedom of per-
son, freedom of religious belief, the right of appeal against state functionaries,
and the autonomy of national minorities. Political rights have been guar-
anteed under the Chinese constitutions to all citizens age eighteen and over
as "the right to vote and stand for election."23 The exceptions are those
persons deprived of this right by law.
Civil rights not contained in the constitutions include those rights laid
down in the Universal Declaration and International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, such as freedom of residence or movement, the right to
choose one's work, freedom from forced labor, freedom from torture, and
the presumption of innocence, although there is a right of defense and of a
public trial.24 This formal guarantee of civil freedoms, while surprising, has
a number of explanations. China, like other communist countries, is a state
operating not on a common law basis but according to concepts of civil
law. According to these concepts, the constitution is directed not at the
courts but at the legislator, establishing the parameters of permissible prac-
tice. But since the constitution is not judicially actionable, the state faces
no problem of being obliged to put the rights guaranteed in the constitution
23. 1978 Constitution, art. 44, reprinted in Peking Review 21 (17 March 1978), 13.
24. Edwards, Henkin, and Nathan, note 20 above, 32. Although the Chinese constitutions
contain no prohibition on the subject of torture, it is prohibited by law. See Seymour,
note 20 above, 295-96.
During the Maoist period, the hierarchy of rights contained in the 195
constitution generally accorded with empirical reality. Under Mao, the so
cialist emphasis on collective social and economic rights in preference t
individual civil and political rights was most fully realized. Under this so
cioeconomic security system, Chinese citizens achieved an improved stan-
dard of living over the pre-1949 years, relatively egalitarian forms of distri-
bution, access (if limited) to health and education services even in the
collective sector of the countryside, and access to secure, if overstaffed jobs.
If the result was an equality of poverty, it was nonetheless a poverty padded
with important economic and social safeguards against destitution, starva-
tion, ill health, and ignorance.40
On the other hand, the actual limits imposed in reality on civil and
political rights, including the nominal freedoms of speech, press, assembly,
association, procession, and demonstration, were reflected in the constitu
tion's insistence on countervailing "duties." The effective self-limiting mech-
anisms within the 1954 constitution restricting the exercise of civil right
were early bolstered by separate regulations affecting freedom of speech
state secrets were defined as including "all state affairs which have not been
decided upon or ... have not yet been made public."41 A 1951 law against
counter-revolution also restricted the rights of association, assembly, and
speech, which could not be used to oppose the regime, and the right of a
public trial was undermined by the provisions of the 1957 regulations on
rehabilitation, which allowed that, "in the case of minor crimes, police might
sentence counter-revolutionaries without trial to terms of three years in
labor camp, extendable by a year."42
One area in which the 1954 constitution did not accord with reality,
however, was its declaration that "citizens of the People's Republic of Chin
are equal before the law."43 As Jerome Cohen has pointed out, that decla
40. On equality of poverty, see David S. G. Goodman, "Communism in East Asia: The
Production Imperative, Legitimacy and Reform," in Goodman, ed., Communism and
Reform in East Asia (London: Frank Cass, 1988), 4. Even in the Maoist era, the "relativity"
of this "equality" of distribution is emphasized by Deborah Davis, who points out that
"keeping social services as a government monopoly and allocating them by job status
also meant that the quality of service varied by the rank of the job not by the price or
cost of the service." See Deborah Davis, "Chinese Social Welfare: Policies and Out-
comes," The China Quarterly, September 1989, no. 119:579.
41. Edwards, Henkin, and Nathan, note 20 above, 104.
42. Ibid., 104-05, quoting Jerome Cohen, The Criminal Process in the People's Republic o
China, 1949-1963: An Introduction (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968), 299-
302.
43. See 1954 Constitution, reprinted in Theodore Chen, ed., The Chinese Communist Regime:
Documents and Commentary (New York: Praeger, 1967), 75-92.
46. Cohen, note 30 above, 839. Cohen's analysis provides the basis for the discussion of the
congruence between the 1975 and 1978 constitutions and informal reality.
47. Ibid., 829-31.
48. For example, Ta-ling Lee, "Intellectuals and 'Democratic Elements': A Distrusted Un-
derclass," in Yuan-li Wu et al., note 19 above, 154-92.
49. 1975 Constitution, art. 3.
50. 1975 Constitution, art. 12.
In its provision of civil and political rights, the 1982 constitution fulfill
the conservative function of underwriting social stability. This role was con
sistent with its official representation as a significant break with the mores
of the Cultural Revolution. On the other hand, it was also represented a
return to the values of the 1954 constitution. The assertion of unambiguous
control by the Deng Xiaoping leadership was reflected in the identificati
of economic construction as the main task of the new era, in the downgradi
55. These aims were outlined by Peng Zhen, the vice chairman of the constitutional revision
committee, in introducing the new constitution. See Peng Zhen, "Explanations on the
Draft of the Revised Constitution of the People's Republic of China," 23rd session of the
Fifth National People's Congress Standing Committee, 22 April 1982, Beijing Review 25
(10 May 1982): 18-26; Edwards, Henkin, and Nathan, note 20 above, 115.
56. For an excellent analysis of the 1982 constitution, see Edwards, Henkin, and Nathan,
note 20 above, 115-20.
57. 1982 Constitution, art. 41.
58. Edwards, Henkin, and Nathan, note 20 above, 119.
Between 1979 and 1980 a series of laws were enacted which institu-
tionalized the new commitment to the rule of law: the Arrest and Detention
Act, the Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure Law, the Organic Law for the
Courts, the Organic Law for the Procuratorate and, in 1982, the Provisional
Civil Procedure Law. Cohen has subsequently referred to the "remarkable
decade of progress towards creating a credible rule of law" in the period
immediately preceding June 1989.60
Before June 1989, judicial review of the legality of administrators' de-
cisions was being considered, and the National People's Congress was even
on the verge of abolishing the category of "counter-revolution" as a crime.61
On the other hand, in 1982-1983 the National People's Congress adopted
amendments to the Criminal Law which made a wide range of new offenses
punishable by death. It also made possible summary executions and limited
the right to defense.62 Increasing petty criminal activities, a byproduct of
social and economic dislocation, produced stiffer criminal penalties, and
between 1983 and 1988 Amnesty International documented 1,500 execu-
tions and also unofficial estimates of 30,000 executions.63
In Amnesty's view, the appeal procedure and the trial itself continued
to be largely formalities, death sentences were excessive and often inap-
propriate, and arbitrary arrest and torture continued to be widespread.64 This
failure of the legal system to uphold and enforce the informal condition of
civil rights led many to describe the new legal system as rule by law rather
than of law.65 In this sense, the conservative role of the legal system in
enforcing orthodoxy was similar to the restrictive role of the constitution.
Nevertheless, the greater informal access to civil rights in an overall
sense in this period, most strongly reflected in the 1978-1980 Democracy
Movement, was later demonstrated in the 1986 and 1989 student demon-
strations. These expressions of dissatisfaction with the rate of change can
also be seen as symptoms of an increased popular confidence in the reality
and prospect of improved civil rights. The exercise of these rights of ex-
pression demonstrated the leeway which existed between the essentially
conservative function of the formal legal system in enforcing stability and
60. Jerome Cohen, "Law and Leadership in China," Far Eastern Economic Review 145 (13
July 1989): 23.
61. Ibid.
62. See Amnesty International, "People's Republic of China: The Death Penalty in China,"
January 1989, ASA 17/01/89, 3-13; Franz Michael, "Law: A Tool of Power," in Yuan-li
Wu et al., note 19 above, 50-52.
63. Amnesty International, note 62 above, 3-4.
64. Ibid., 5, 7.
65. On the failure of the legal system to uphold civil rights, see Seymour, note 19 above,
especially 286-87. See also Amnesty International, China: Violations of Human Rights-
Prisoners of Conscience and the Death Penalty in the People's Republic of China (London:
Amnesty International, 1984), 83-106.
66. Nathan, Chinese Democracy, (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985), 195-96.
67. Deng Xiaoping, "Dang he Guojia Lingdao di Gaige" ("The Reform of Party and State
Leadership"), in Deng Xiaoping Xuanji (The Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping) (Beijing:
Beijing Renmin Chubanshe 1983), 134.
68. Zhao Ziyang, "Advance along the Road of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics: Report
delivered to the 13th National Congress of the CCP," Beijing Review 30 (9 November
1987): I-XXVII. For assessments of the implementation of these policies, see John P. Burns,
"China's Governance: Political Reform in a Turbulent Environment," The China Quarterly
(September 1989) no. 119:481-518; You Ji, "Politics of China's Post-Mao Reforms: From
the CCP's 13th Party Congress to the Dawn of Beijing Students' Demonstrations" (M.A.
thesis, Australian National University, August 1989).
69. Zhao Ziyang, note 68 above, xx.
70. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and House Committee on Foreign Affairs, China:
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 1988, 101st Cong., 1st sess., 1989, 771.
71. Zhao Ziyang, note 68 above, xx.
The social and economic rights guaranteed in the 1982 constitution also
diverged from reality in a number of ways. While some provisions we
restrictive, others guaranteed rights that no longer existed in reality or con
tained programmatic rights that were not currently realizable. This distance
from reality was due chiefly to the rapid structural changes in the economy
which were not paralleled by changes in social security legislation and
regulations or by the transformation of the social security and social welfar
infrastructure. Since 1978, the change from a centrally planned social
economy to a "socialist commodity" or market economy had brought de
collectivization of agriculture, the separation of ownership and management
within factories, some market-based pricing policies, and a freer labor mar-
ket, as well as a new emphasis on the importance of "expertise" ov
"redness" and of competition over egalitarianism.
The result was that the right to work, although still formally guaranteed
in the 1982 constitution, was progressively undermined by the market mech
anism; although the rice bowl was not smashed, it became cracked b
redundancy, unemployment, large wage differentials, and inflation. The in-
troduction of contract labor into state enterprises implied official sancti
for the informal right to choose one's employment (and for the conver
right to be unemployed), as well as for the civil right of movement (to find
a job), neither of which were rights granted under China's constitutions. And
yet, the economic right to strike, a right guaranteed workers in most advance
market economies, was eliminated from the 1982 constitution. Despite th
anachronistic restriction, the right to strike was exercised as never befo
during the 1980s.83
But the most glaring inconsistency between the 1982 constitution an
informal reality was the programmatic character of Article 45, which su
stantially overstated the possible scope of welfare and social security services
It stated that "citizens of the People's Republic of China have the right
84. This concept was first used in Deborah Davis, note 40 above, 596.
85. Ibid.; Jeffrey R. Taylor, "Rural Employment Trends and the Legacy of Surplus Labor, 1978-
86," The China Quarterly, December 1988, no. 116:753-58.
86. Davis, note 40 above, 579.
87. Anita Chan, "The Challenge to the Social Fabric," The Pacific Review 2, no.2 (1989):
127-28.
For several reasons China has proceeded with economic reform in a piecemeal
fashion, so at present the old and new systems co-exist alongside each other.
... However, this blending of two systems has undoubtedly generated a series
of thorny problems . . . with neither the old mandatory system nor the new
market system effectively dominating the distribution of resources, the defects
of both systems have been magnified.110
Thus, in the decade before June 1989, China was caught between two
systems, rejecting the nexus established under the command economy be-
tween social security and guaranteed employment, but not yet having erected
the safety net that protected citizens from the "fall-out" factor in the market
economy.
Added to these structural problems in 1988-1989 were short-term social
and economic problems. In 1988, the sharp price rises, officially estimated
at 18.5 percent, but by other sources as fluctuating between 20 percent and
30 percent, had effectively undermined the improved living standards which,
until 1987, had served in China to cushion and disguise the slow erosion
of social and economic rights."' As of 1987, the 10 to 11 percent GNP
increase in real terms over the previous three years had far outweighed a
7.3 percent inflation rate. The trickle-down effect had indeed resulted in an
107. "Proposal of the CCP Central Committee on the Implementation of the Seventh Five Year
Plan," published in Zhongguo Nianjian (1986), 91.
108. Huang Xiaojing and Yang Xiao, note 37 above, 149.
109. Ibid., 154, 159.
110. Liu Guoguang, "A Sweet and Sour Decade," Beijing Review 32 (2 January 1989): 21.
111. State Statistical Bureau, "Changes in the Life-style of Urban Residents," Beijing Review
31 (14 November 1988): 26-7; "Improved Living Standards for Farmers," Beijing Review
31 (21-27 November 1988), 25.
IX. CONCLUSION
112. Ibid.
113. State Statistical Bureau, "China's Economy in 1988," reprinted in British Broadcasting
Corp., Summary of World Broadcasts SWB/FE/0401/C1/5-6 (6 March 1989). See also
Stavis, note 83 above.
114. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, note 3 above, art. 25(1): "Everyone has the right
to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family,
including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and
the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old
age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control."