Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quick Timeline that shows how the Holy Roman Empire lives
on in DC aka UNITED STATES INC and its Pawns.
Follow the facts and patterns. Facts and patterns never lie,
people do...Whatever is in the dark, must come out into the
light. We have been living a lie!
See:
Timeline
Note: Before you review the timeline Note: In March 2023, the
Pope, aka the Vatican, aka Holy Rome Empire, renounced the
Doctrine of Discovery as void ab initio, which means everything
they did was void from the start. Also, replace the name Indian,
Black, Negro, Nigger, Afro-American, and Minority with MOOR.
The reason why the POPE, Vatican, King, and Queen (1)
removed their Moor flag, (2) made up fake codes, (3) changed
their religion and culture, and (4) categorized Moors and stood
up to their rigged Jesuit Courtrooms was to prevent the Moors
from suing them. For example, the Japanese sued them. They
settled with the Japanese because the Japanese had a flag
and nation and knew who they were.
1215 Magna Charter (if you are a king, pope or leader, act
like one or you will be dissolved)
1217 Charter of the Forest (no human being can harm
another; if they do, they must make the victim whole. It also states
there must be a fair trial vs. Kangaroo court (the Nazis designed
kangaroo court)
1400 1452, 1455, and 1493 Doctrine of Discovery said if you
are white and Christian, you are a human being. If you are not,
then you are not human.
1604 Secret Meeting in Greenwich London
https://listverse.com/2020/07/15/8-reasons-the-british-crown-still-
controls-the-united-states/
1606 Holy Roman Empire dissolved due to fraud
1666 Cestui Qu Act means you are lost at sea, and the Pope
owes everything until you claim it.
1662 VA, aka Holy Roman Empire White Wash slave code
- Document B: December 1662. Act VI: Women servants got with child by their
masters after their time expired to be sold by the Churchwardens for two years for
the good of the parish. Whereas by act of Assembly, every woman servant having
a bastard is to serve two years, and late experience shows that some dissolute
masters have gotten their maids with child and yet claim the benefit of their
service, and on the contrary, if a woman got with child by her master should be
freed from that service it might probably induce such loose persons to lay all their
bastards to their masters; it is therefore thought fit and accordingly enacted and be
it enacted henceforward that each woman servant got with child by her master
shall after her time by
indenture or custom is expired be by the churchwardens of the parish where she lived
when she was brought to bed of such a bastard, sold for two years, and the tobacco
to be employed by the vestry for the use of the parish.
Document C:
December, 1662. Act XII: Negro women’s children to serve according to the
condition of the mother.
Whereas some doubts have arisen whether children got by any Englishman upon a
negro woman should be slave or free, Be it therefore enacted and declared by this
present grand assembly, that all children borne in this country shall be held bond or
free only according to the condition of the mother, And that
if any Christian
shall commit fornication with a negro man or woman, he or she so offending shall
pay double the fines imposed by the former act.
Document D:
September, 1667. Act III: An act declaring that baptism of slaves doth not exempt
them from bondage.
Whereas some doubts have risen whether children that are slaves by birth, and by
the charity and piety of their owners made partakers of the blessed sacrament of
baptism, should by virtue of their baptism be made free; It is enacted and declared
by this grand assembly, and the authority thereof, that
the conferring of baptism doth not alter the condition of the person as
to his bondage or freedom
; that diverse masters, freed from this doubt, may more carefully endeavor the
propagation of Christianity by permitting children, though slaves, or those of
greater growth if capable to be admitted to the sacrament.
Document E: October 1669. Act I:
An act about the casual killing of slaves
. Whereas the only law in force for the punishment of refractory servants resisting
their master, mistress or overseer cannot be inflicted upon negroes, nor the
obstinacy of many of them by other than violent means suppressed,
Be it enacted and declared by this grand assembly, if any
slave resist his master (or others by his master’s order correcting him) and by the
extremity of the correction
should chance to die, that his death shall not be considered a felony, but the
master (or that other person appointed by the master to punish him) be acquitted from
molestation, since it cannot be presumed that malice existed
(which alone makes murder a felony) [or that anything] should induce any man to
destroy his own estate.
Document G:
April, 1691. Act XVI: An act for suppressing outlying slaves.
Whereas many times negroes, mulattoes, and other slaves unlawfully absent
themselves from their masters and mistresses service, and lie hid and lurk in
obscure places killing hogs and committing other injuries to the inhabitants of this
dominion, for remedy whereof for the future, Be it enacted by their majesties
lieutenant governor, council, and burgesses of this present general assembly, and
the authority thereof, and it is hereby enacted, that in all such cases upon
intelligence of any such negroes, mulattoes, or other slaves lying out, two of their
majesties justices of the peace of that country...shall be empowered and
commanded [to issue warrants to the sheriffs to summon as many men as he needs
to arrest the runaways] and in case any negroes, mulattoes or other slave or slaves
lying out as aforesaid shall resist, runaway, or refuse to deliver and surrender him
or themselves ... in such cases it shall and may be lawful ...
to kill and destroy such negroes, mulattoes, and other slave or slaves
by gun or any other
ways whatsoever. Provided that where any negro or mulatto slave shall be killed in
pursuance of this act,
the owner or owners of such negro or mulatto slave shall be paid for such negro or
mulatto slave four thousand pounds of tobacco by the public
. And for the prevention of that abominable mixture and spurious issue which
hereafter may increase in this dominion, as well as by negroes, mulattoes, and
Indians intermarrying with English, or other white women, as by their unlawful
accompanying with one another, Be it enacted by the authority aforesaid, and it is
hereby enacted, that for the time to come,
whatsoever English or other white man or woman being free shall intermarry with
a negroe, mulatto, or Indian man or woman bond or free shall within three months
after such marriage
be banished and removed from this dominion forever.
And forasmuch as great inconveniences may happen to this country by the setting
of negroes and mulattoes free, by their either entertaining negro slaves from their
masters service, or receiving stolen goods, or being grown old bring a charge upon
the country; for prevention thereof, Be it enacted by the authority aforesaid, and it
is hereby enacted, That
no negro or mulatto be after the end of this present session of assembly set free by any person
or persons whatsoever, unless such person or persons, their heirs, executors or
administrators pay for
the transportation of such negro or negroes out of the country within six months
after such setting them free, upon penalty of paying ten pounds sterling to the
Churchwardens of the parish where such person shall dwell with, which money, or
so much thereof as shall be necessary, the said Churchwardens are to cause the said
negro or mulatto to be transported out of the country, and the remainder of the
said money to employ to the use of the poor of the parish
Document H:
October 1705. Chap. XLIX: An act concerning servants and slaves.
…And also be it enacted ... That
all servants imported and brought into this country, by sea or land, who were not
Christians in their native country (except Turks and Moors in amity with her
majesty and others that can make due proof of their being free in England, or any
other Christian country, before they were shipped, in order to transportation hither)
shall be accounted and be slaves, and as such be here bought and sold
notwithstanding a conversion to Christianity afterward.
…And also be it enacted … That
all masters and owners of servants shall find and provide for their servants, a
wholesome and competent diet, clothing, and lodging, by the discretion of the
county court; and shall not, at any time, give immoderate correction; neither shall,
at any time, whip a Christian white servant naked, without an order from a justice
of the peace: And if any, notwithstanding this act, shall presume to whip a
Christian white servant naked, without such order, the person so offending, shall
forfeit and pay for the same, forty shillings sterling, to the party injured… And for
a further Christian care and usage of all Christian servants, Be it also enacted …
That no negros, mullatos, or Indians, although Christians, or Jews, Moors, Mahometans, or
other infidels, shall, at any time, purchase any Christian servant, nor any other, except of
their own complexion, or such as are declared slaves by this act : And if any negro,
mulatto, or Indian, Jew, Moor, Mahometan, or another infidel, or such as are
declared slaves by this act, shall, notwithstanding, purchase any white Christian
servant, the said servant shall, ipso facto, become free and acquit from any service then due,
and shall be so held, deemed, and taken. And for further prevention of that abominable
mixture and spurious issue, which hereafter may increase in this her majesty’s colony
and dominion, as well as by English, and other white
men and women intermarrying with negros and mulattos, as by their unlawful
coition with them, Be it enacted … That whatsoever English, or other white man or
woman, being free, shall intermarry with a negro or mulatto man or woman, bond or
free, shall, by the judgment of the county court, be committed to prison, and there
remain, without bail; and shall forfeit and pay ten pounds current money of
Virginia, to the use of the parish, as aforesaid. And be it further enacted, That
no minister of the church of England, or other minister, or
person whatsoever, within this colony and dominion, shall hereafter wittingly
presume to marry a white man with a negro or mulatto woman; or to marry a white
woman with a negro or mulatto man, upon pain of forfeiting and paying, for every
such marriage the sum of ten
thousand pounds of tobacco see:
https://www.scribd.com/document/97512404/Virginia-Slave-Codes
.
1724 Treaty of the Peace between Moors and The United
States Inc signed by the Pope, King, and KKK
1724 Black (MOORS) CHRISTIAN CODE signed by the
Pope and King see:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/55212595/Christian-Black-
Codes-1724 It states Decrees the expulsion of the Jews (real
Jews) from the colony.
https://www.scribd.com/document/456452820/Christian-
Black-Codes-of-1724
The Christian Black Codes of 1724, were initiated during reconstruction after the
Civil war to control blacks after they were emancipated. Passed by Southern
States, instead of giving blacks the same rights as white people, the codes limited
the black’s freedom severely. They included that blacks had to be in service of a
white person, that they could not have congregations together, that they could not
speak out, and that they could not have weapons. They also included that blacks
could not go out without a white 'supervisor'; thus, blacks had to take on the
religions and holidays and gods of their white superiors. These same black codes
were said to have been made null and void with the ratification of the 13th
Amendment in 1865, although many southern states adopted "Black Codes" to
keep former slaves from voting and imposed other restrictions. The 14th and 15th
Amendments were to supposedly eliminate these codes, but as you read them down
below and study the law of the land in conjunction with Religion and Politics,
you'll discover these codes have been modernized in disguise, and many are still in
affect.The “Christian” BLACK Codes of 1724Page 1 of 7Christian Black Codes of
17241/8/2015http://www.macquirelatory.com/christian%20black%20codes%20of
%201724.html
1740 Negro Act of 1740 aka MOOR Act of 1740
https://www.scribd.com/document/105157411/Treaty-of-
Peace-Friendship-Morocco-United-States-1787
2020 Report Ref Why the United States Inc had to change
the culture of Indians, Hawaiian, Alaska see:
https://www.scribd.com/document/638249691/United-States-
Inc-s-Residential-Schools-designed-by-NAZI-GENERAL-with-
goal-to-change-the-Natives-cultures-so-the-Whites-could-steal-
their-land-see-pag
https://listverse.com/2020/07/15/8-reasons-the-british-
crown-still-controls-the-united-states/
Others
***Over 200 pages of Past Precedence, SMJ, Void Ab initio
and etc.:
https://www.scribd.com/document/654306671/Over-200-
pages-of-Ref-SMJ-Past-Precedence-laws-etc
Executive Order 13164 (ADA)
Moorish Holy Temple of Science
Meet Your Strawman and whatever you want to know:
https://www.scribd.com/document/384050816/Meet-Your-
Strawman-and-Whatever-You-Want-to-Know-Editabil?
fbclid=IwAR1OCs-
7TUTNtM3d35_JjE7LZby5Cgawqqt6mVYGxbGXVu6PE15eok
Ft_lA
BID BONDS:
https://www.scribd.com/document/442533049/BID-BOND-
PAYMENT-BOND-PERFORMANCE-BOND-docx
Example how the System sets Americans (Brad and
Shaunel) up using BID BONDS
https://www.scribd.com/document/643465636/Motion-to-
Redeem-His-Bid-Bonds-and-Stop-Playing-as-Their-Bid-Bond-
Game-is-Not-a-Secret
See: https://www.scribd.com/read/228896002/Crimes-of-the-
FBI-DOJ-Mafia-and-al-Qaeda
The greatest threat to the people of the United States is the
deep-seated culture of the lawyers in the United States
Department of Justice (DOJ). It adversely affects national
security and the lives of America’s people. No form of
reorganization will correct this problem without exposing the
pattern of criminal and even 11subversive activities that I and
my dozens of government insiders discovered during
hundreds of years of cumulative experience. Forget
everything you were taught or felt about integrity, honesty,
guilt or inno- cence in the FBI and other divisions of the U.S.
Department of Justice. Forget everything you may have heard
about people sentenced to prison deserving what they got.
The integrity of many who have been sentenced to federal
prison is far greater than many Justice Department
prosecutors whose misconduct constitutes major crimes and
would be punishable if they were ordinary citizens. Deeply
Embedded Justice Department Culture The Justice
Department culture is political, corrupt, and extremely
dangerous to the people. The people in control of the
awesome Justice Department power are re- sponsible for
human tragedies far beyond anyone’s comprehension. The
Justice Department, under the U.S. Attorney General, includes
the Solicitor General, Fed- eral Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
the U.S. attorneys, Drug Enforcement Adminis- tration (DEA),
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), U.S. Marshals
(USMS), and Bureau of Prisons (BP). The Justice
Department is a political animal and covers up for the crimes
of presi- dents who appoint many of its top officials and for
the president’s allies. The crimes of Ronald Reagan and
George H.W. Bush in the October Surprise and
Contra gun and drug smuggling activities were covered up and
not prosecuted. The crimes of federal judges and top
government officials are routinely covered up. The
consequence has been great harm to national security and the
lives of count- less numbers of people. In 1989, when U.S.
Attorney General Edwin Meese was testifying in a criminal
trial, he was asked, “Is it not true that your focus was not the
focus of an attorney gen- eral wearing the attorney general’s
hat but basically to gather information to protect the
President and deal with the political problem brewing in
Congress? Meese replied, “Yes.” As usual, the Justice
Department’s 1986 probe into the sale of arms to Iran was
not to find the facts but to protect President Reagan who
appointed him. This is the normal Justice Department
obstruction of justice, which is kept from the public by a
compliant media that aids and abets the obstruction of jus-
tice. When the Justice Department investigates itself or
political allies, it usually selects “investigators” who are
politically appointed staff members. It diffuses congres-
sional investigations by stating the matters are under Justice
Department investi- gation—which never comes to fruition
and eventually the matter passes on. Since attorney generals
are political appointees, it would be unrealistic in light of the
complicity of the government and media checks and balances
to expect them to honestly investigate the corrupt activities of
the people who are responsible for their high position! The
prosecutor in the Justice Department has more control over
the amount of human tragedies that the government can
inflict upon America’s men, women, and families. He can file
false charges, pay for informants to provide perjured testi-
mony, release to the media information about people or
corporations being inves- tigated, interview friends and
neighbors seek arrested and who to be protected, and use
one-sided information to get a grand jury to indict a person or
corporation. There are a reported 3,000-plus criminal
offenses on the books. They can be used against anyone as a
tool by the Justice Department to silence any criticism or
expo- sure of high-level corruption in government. Under the
creative Justice Depart- ment, almost any act can be made
into a criminal act, including the conspiracy statute and the
mail and wire fraud statutes. Prosecutors have a virtual
unlimited authority to determine who will or will not be
investigated, who will or will not be called before a grand jury,
who will or will not be prosecuted. Prosecutors will fre-
quently ignore serious criminal activities for political
considerations or favoritism. Raw Power That Controls
Media and Corporate Silence Any corporation, including
broadcast and print media, can be seriously harmed and even
put out of business by a unit of government that is easily
controlled by Justice Department lawyers. The great number
of regulations affecting a corpo- ration can be the basis for
false or even real but minor charges, putting them at risk. An
airline, for instance, with thousands of records and hundreds
of require- ments, can easily be charged with record violations
and fined huge amounts of money. Or put out of business.
The public perceives such charges as indicative of serious
safety problems. But similar violations in thousands of
required records could be found at any airline and are often of
minor consequence. Members of Congress are especially
prone to misuse of Justice Department power. Leaks to the
press that a particular member of Congress is being
investigated can have a devastating influence on his
reelection. The influence would be even worse if false charges
were filed against the member of Congress. With the vast
amount of political donations that is a part of their daily life, it
is not difficult to find a basis for conducting an investigation.
Organized Crime in the U.S. Justice Department
“Organized Crime in the U.S. Justice Dept” was the heading in
the Forum section of the Sacramento Bee (October 27, 1991),
accurately reflecting the decades of criminality in the most
misnamed agency of the federal government:
“Indications...point to a widespread conspiracy implicating
government offi- cials in the theft of Inslaw’s technology.”
Inslaw, bad as it was, constituted only the tip of the iceberg.
Inslaw is described in detail in Defrauding America, and
consisted of Justice Depart- ment attorneys forcing a
company into bankruptcy so they could steal its computer
software called PROMIS. The attorneys had an interest in a
company that would be bidding on a lucrative government
contract worth a half-billion dollars to install a computer
program in Department of Justice offices. DOJ Blocked
Every Effort to Halt Crash-Related Corruption in the
Aviation Field For 30 years, Justice Department attorneys
blocked every attempt I and other gov- ernment agents made
to report high-level corruption that we discovered as part of
our official duties. If my reports, or those by other government
agents, of criminal activities had received the reaction
required by law, there would not have been the extent of
government corruption that now exists (and which is largely
unknown to the majority of the public). Responsibilities of
Justice Department Employees Under federal law, the
responsibility for ensuring that the laws of the United States
are properly enforced belongs to the United States
Department of Justice, which is under the control of the U.S.
Attorney General, and in turn, the President of the United
States. In practice, the politically appointed Attorney General
routinely has used the Justice Department to cover up corrupt
and criminal acts involving high-level government personnel
or corrupt covert activities of the CIA and other covert
agencies—including CIA drug trafficking. These problems
occurred during the Reagan and Bush administrations and
were especially prominent during the Clinton presidency, as
Attorney General Janet Reno protected him and the
Democratic Party. Occasionally the checks and balances work
as intended, and the person in that position of trust goes to
prison. Attorney General John Mitchell, for instance, went to
prison, as did Webster Hubbell and other attorney generals.
Subsequent attorney generals have committed federal of-
fenses involving far more serious crimes, and were never
prosecuted or called to task by the poorly functioning checks
and balances in government and the media. Responsible for
Protecting the Civil Rights of American Citizens Within the
U.S. Department of Justice are numerous divisions. These
include, for instance, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
responsible for investigating the many crimes that I reported
to it; the civil rights division, with the responsibilities to
investigate the civil rights violations that I reported to them;
the criminal divi- sion, responsible for preventing the many
criminal activities that I reported to them (including those
perpetrated by Justice Department personnel seeking to block
my reports); the U.S. Trustee, who is responsible for
preventing the rampant fraud in bankruptcy courts that I and
others reported to that office; the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), responsible for preventing the massive
drug trafficking, in- cluding that committed by the CIA and
DEA. This is the Justice Department that has persecuted me
continuously since mid- 1987, retaliating against me for
reporting the federal crimes that I uncovered; who retaliated
against me for exercising lawful and constitutional protections
to halt the barrage of civil and constitutional (and criminal)
violations inflicted upon me. Every one of these divisions has
been routinely used to commit the federal crimes
that they have a duty to prevent. Succession of Corrupt
Attorneys General A succession of Attorneys General have
been implicated in corrupt acts and federal crimes, but have
escaped prosecution because they held the highest law
enforce- ment position in the United States. Subsequent
Attorneys General have committed federal offenses involving
far more serious crimes, and were never prosecuted or called
to task by the checks and balances in government. Attorney
General Edwin Meese, a former California lawyer and Alameda
County District Attorney, was prominently associated with an
escalation of the sleazy and corrupt activities in government.
He was implicated in the 1980 October Surprise scheme that
helped bring the Reagan-Bush team into power. As a reward,
or to pro- tect the Reagan-Bush team from prosecution in that
scandal, the Reagan-Bush Administration appointed Meese
U.S. Attorney General. Meese was then used to protect
Reagan and Bush from the October Surprise scandal and
others that fol- lowed. When the stench from Meese’s
activities forced him to resign, he was replaced by Richard
Thornburgh, who continued the criminal activities of Inslaw,
the obstruc- tion of justice activities, and the persecution of
whistleblowers and informants. Thornburgh left the Attorney
General position in 1991 to run for the Senate seat va- cated
by the death of Senator John Heinz in a plane crash in
Philadelphia. A Penn- sylvania newspaper identified
Thornburgh as the “Harrisburg Mafia.” President George
H.W. Bush, who had a long-time relationship with the CIA,
then appointed¹ William P. Barr as U.S. Attorney General. Barr
was General Counsel of the CIA while Bush was Director of
the Agency. From the very beginning, Barr blocked
investigations into the major scandals that were surfacing
almost daily, in- cluding those that directly involved the
Justice Department and the CIA. Barr has a long history of CIA
relations. Barr blocked an investigation of the part played by
Justice Department officials in the Inslaw affair, denying the
request by the House Judiciary Committee for an Independent
Prosecutor.² Barr refused to appoint a special prosecutor to
inves- tigate the White House’s funding of Iraq’s military
build-up. Barr refused to ap- point an independent prosecutor
to investigate the White House’s role in the Bank of Lavoro
scandal. He refused to appoint an Independent Prosecutor to
investigate Inslaw. The House and Senate Judiciary
committees had requested the Attorney General to request
appointment of an independent prosecutor in each of these
matters. Decades of Obstruction of Justice It has been a
common practice to appoint someone to the highest law
enforcement position in the United States who has been
involved in criminal activities, and act as damage control.
Before William Barr was appointed U.S. Attorney General by
President George Bush, he was legal counsel for the CIA‘s
Southern Air Transport, and former CIA operative Terry Reed
said that he personally saw Barr in drug- related activities.
Another source, Gene Tatum, also personally encountered
Barr in similar activities. This same general practice is
applied to the political selection of federal judges who then
act to block any prosecution or revealing civil actions. Bush
was heavily involved in the overall drug smuggling activities,
acting with Oliver North and other drug traffickers, and it
would be only “normal” to put one of their own at the head of
the nation’s top law-enforcement agency. Further, U.S.
Attorneys are se- lected to insure that this plan works. This
problem reflects one of the major flaws in our constitution. It
was visibly reflected during the presidency of Ronald Reagan,
George Bush, and Bill Clinton.
Threat to Any Member of Congress The mere investigation
by the FBI arm of the Justice Department can cause a mem-
ber of the U.S. Senate and House to lose an election. The
Justice Department can easily fabricate charges, especially
conspiracy or misprision of felony offenses, by stretching
facts clearly out of proportion to reality. Possibly the fear of
what the Jus- tice Department can do was one of the reasons
every member of the U.S. Senate from 1991 to 1993 refused
to respond to my multi-page petition to investigate the
corruption I brought to their attention. But this was no excuse
for them aiding and abetting the criminal activities. They had
a duty to perform. When they accepted their position, they
assumed the responsibilities that went with the pay, the
perks, and the prestige. Pattern of Criminal Activities by
Justice Department For thirty years I have been intimately
connected with the criminal acts committed by Justice
Department officials and their various divisions. Their
misconduct in the 1960s, which I initially discovered while a
federal investigator, had devastating consequences in the
aviation areas that I brought to their attention. Since then, as
these pages reveal, the criminality in the U.S. Department of
Justice has increased many times over, very possibly making it
the key cog in the pattern of racketeering activities against the
American people. If Justice Department personnel did, in
fact, do any of the acts described within these pages, these
same personnel would have to misuse the power of the
federal government and of the Justice Department to block
the reporting of these crimes. These Justice Department
lawyers have made it standard practice to misuse Justice
Department facilities to falsely charge dozens of informants
and whistleblowers with federal offenses to block their
reporting of crimes implicating federal officials. America
reportedly has the greatest percentage of its population in
prison of any country in the world. Outrageous prison
sentences are imposed for often-minor of- fenses, such as
filling in swamps on one’s own property or being found with
small quantities of drugs. Minor drug offenders are sentenced
to twenty or more years in prison for a one-time offense while
vicious killers are often released in a fraction of the time.
Often the drug offender is a person simply filling the demand
created by a drug-crazed society, which may arguably share a
greater blame than the person re- sponding to the demand.
These outrageous prison sentences are legislated by the same
members of Con- gress who have committed crimes
associated with their cover-up of the criminal activities
described within these pages. These congressional felonies are
often worse than the offenses that place thousands of people
in prison for years of con- finement. Army of Informants
Looking for Victims— Another Growth Industry
Government agencies, and especially the various divisions of
the Department of Justice, have thousands of agents and
informants who must find offenses com- mitted by people.
They search public and financial records looking for technical
er- rors that they can charge as federal crimes—and the list is
endless, including mat- ters committed by almost any adult.
They set up elaborate pseudo criminal enterprises and look for
people they can en- tice into them in such a way that criminal
charges can be filed. The coalition of government agents,
informants, and prosecutors are quite imaginative. Anyone
trapped into one of them doesn’t stand much of a chance
against this coalition with unlimited funds and juries that will
believe virtually anything the “govern- ment” charges.
One example: a government informant may induce a “patsy”
to assist him in undercover work, falsely encouraging him to
assist in bringing about the arrest of alleged drug traffickers.
The patsy is told to contact certain people—who are actu- ally
undercover government agents—and to gain their confidence
by bragging about past drug trafficking activities. The patsy
doing the bragging may never have been near drugs or
involved in any drug offense, but he is told it is a chance to
work for the government and be well paid. Unknown to the
patsy, he is telling these tall tales to government undercover
agents who arrest him after his fabricated drug-trafficking
statements are recorded. Based simply upon these
statements—no drugs are involved—the patsy who is no
match for this government conspiracy, is charged, tried, and
then naive jurors find him guilty. Chalk up another “win” for
the public and Congress’ tough-on-crime stance. The jurors
have a “feel-good” attitude, and government agents receive
bonuses. Oh yes, the patsy may get life in prison with no
chance of parole.
1800 BCE - 200 BCE : Germanic Tribes began to settle in Areas starting
in SouthernScandinavia (near Denmark) to Northern Germany, and then
further expanding towards Europe.9 CE :
Battle of Teutoburg Forest
An Alliance of Germanic Tribes led by Arminius defeated 3Roman
Legions ; halting Roman expansion east of the River Rhine ; widely
credited as theBirth of German History.378 CE :
Battle of Adrianople :
Roman Defeat at the hands of Gothic Tribes ; considered asstart the of of
the Decline of the Western Roman Empire800 CE : Emperor
Charlemagne ruler of the Kingdom of the Franks was crowned
RomanEmperor by Pope Leo III , ruled France and Germany843 CE :
Division of the Carolingian Empire into 3 ; East Francia under Louis the
German ;which would compose of the Territories of the Later Holy
Roman Empire and Modern dayGermany936 CE : Otto I was crowned
King of Germany ; he would be crowned Emperor in 962 CE byJohn XII
in Rome, marking the founding of the Holy Roman Empire 1250 CE :
Death of Emperor Frederick II Hohenstaufen decentralized the Holy
Roman Empire1517 CE : Martin Luther published his Ninety-Five Theses
; beginning of the Reformation1618 CE - 1648 CE :
Thirty Years War
1648 CE : Treaty of Westphalia ; recognized the Sovereignty of individual
States1805 CE :
Battle of Austerlitz
: Napoleon’s Victory marked the Dissolution of the Holy RomanEmpire,
Establishment of Confederation of the Rhine1815 CE : Congress of
Vienna ; German Confederation was created1818 CE : Karl Heinrich
Marx was born in Prussia1848 CE : Year of Revolutions ; A series of
Revolutions stressing liberal ideals and PanGermanism was defeated by
the ruling Conservative Aristocracy1871 CE : Otto Von Bismarck unites
Germany ; Wilhelm I was proclaimed Emperor of theGerman
Empire1914 CE - 1918 CE :
World War 1
June 28 1919 CE : Signing of the Treaty of Versailles ; ending the War
between Germany andthe Allied Powers ; Establishment of Weimar
Republic1929 CE : The Great Depression1933 CE: Adolf Hitler was
appointed Chancellor ; Start of Hitler’s Third Reich under the Nazis1939
CE : Germany invades Poland
1939 - 1945
World War 2 ;
Nazi Occupation of Europe, The Holocaust1945 CE : Axis defeat at the
Hands of the Allies1949 CE : Germany is divided. The US, French and
British zones in the west becomes theFederal Republic of Germany; the
Soviet zone in the east becomes the communist GermanDemocratic
Republic.1955 CE : West Germany joins Nato; East Germany joins the
Warsaw Pact.1961 CE : Berlin Crisis of 1961 culminating in the
construction of the Berlin Wall1982 CE : Helmut Kohl (CDU) becomes
Chancellor of West Germany and later a ReunitedGermany until 1998
1939 – 1945 World War 2 ;
Nazi Occupation of Europe, The Holocaust1945 CE : Axis defeat at the
Hands of the Allies1949 CE : Germany is divided. The US, French and
British zones in the west becomes theFederal Republic of Germany; the
Soviet zone in the east becomes the communist GermanDemocratic
Republic.1955 CE : West Germany joins Nato; East Germany joins the
Warsaw Pact.1961 CE : Berlin Crisis of 1961 culminating in the
construction of the Berlin Wall1982 CE : Helmut Kohl (CDU) becomes
Chancellor of West Germany and later a ReunitedGermany until
19981989 CE : Fall of the Berlin Wall1990 CE : German
Reunification1998 CE : Gerhard Schröder (SPD) succeeds Kohl as
Chancellor 2002 CE : Germany adopts the Euro2005 CE : Election of
Angela Merkel (CDU) as the first female Chancellor
The Roman Empire Never FellAlthough the fall of the Western
Roman Empire did deal a crippling blow, the Roman Empire still
endured in other parts of the world and did not truly fall. Founded
April 21
st
, 753 B.C.E the Roman Empire started off small and insignificant
but grew over the centuries becoming one of the most powerful
empires the world has ever seen. The empire was split into East
and West in the year 395 A.C.E and on September 4 th
, 476 A.C.E the western half of the Roman Empire fell to the
Germanic leader Odoacer and the stability that the Western half
of the empire brought to the continent of Europe was no more.
Now Rome is no more but what does that mean for the empire? It
certainly didn’t fall it lived on for over 1,000 more years and
continued to spread its influence throughout the known world.
After the fall of the Western Roman Empire the Byzantines to the
Greek east continued for almost another 1,000 years and for that
time the light of the empire continued to shine. Water still flowed
from its fountains, trade goods were still traded through its ports,
and crowds still gathered for chariot races, East and West were
like night and day. In the year 800 Charlemagne was crowned
“Emperor of the Romans” forming the Holy Roman Empire which
lasted until August 6, 1806
1806 and the capital was moved back to Rome from
Constantinople. In the year 1453the Byzantine Empire fell to the
Ottoman Empire and ended the Eastern Roman Empire.
After the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806 the
empire in name was gone but not the influence that it left. The
Roman Empire is the most influential empire in history giving us
many of our modern conveniences including air conditioning,
surgical tools, newspapers, plumbing and sanitary management
and my personal favorite the bath. The Romans gave us the
letters R, A, M, and S and the languages today that derive from
their language Latin now cover half the world. Rome has helped
shape our modern world into what it is today, and the empire may
be gone in name but is and will never truly fall if we use the
brilliant inventions that these extraordinary people gave to
us.Works
Citeshttps://www.warhistoryonline.com/ancient-history/4-reasons-
rome-fell-ever-fall.htmlhttps://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/4979/
there-is-no-such-thing-as-the-fall-of-the-roman-empirehttps://
www.historyextra.com/period/roman/fall-of-rome-how-why-when-
roman-empire-collapse-romulus-augustulus/