Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course deals with the salient provisions and application of the Civil Code of the
Philippines on Partnership and Agency, alongside other relevant laws and jurisprudences. It
involves discussion of the nature, sources, requisites, kinds, and modes of extinguishment of
contracts of partnership and agency, as well the rights and obligations attached thereto. This
course also delves into the forms necessary for the validity and enforceability of partnership and
agency contracts, as well as the governmental policies and rules relating to the registration of
partnerships.
Upon completion of the Legal Management Program, the students will be able to demonstrate
the following attributes of the Graduates of the College of Arts and Sciences:
At the end of this course Agency and Partnership Law, the students should be able to achieve the
following:
LO1. Understand the general principles of partnership and agency under the Civil Code
of the Philippines.
1
LO2. Identify and explain the relevance and application of the legal concepts of
partnership and agency to commercial and business transactions.
LO3. Evaluate and relate the provisions of partnership and agency under the Civil Code
of the Philippines with other relevant business laws and jurisprudences.
LO4. Determine the legal issues on case problems involving partnership and agency, and
ascertain the applicable legal doctrines and jurisprudences.
LO5. Draft different forms of legal documents related to partnership and agency.
LO6. Incorporate the Benedictine values and ideals in learning the basic skills in law and
in the undertaking commercial and business transactions.
Upon completion of the Obligations and Contracts course, the student is expected to be able to
do the following:
2
ASSESSMENT/GRADING SYSTEM:
In accordance with the grading policy of the college, outlined below are the components for the
computation of the grades:
Scope of
Percentage Percentage
Work
(Midterm (Final
Requirements (Individual
Grade) Grade)
or Group)
LO1-LO4 Group and 40% 20%
Explain comprehensively legal doctrines, create Individual
cohesive legal arguments, and apply legal
provisions to issues and/or cases related to
agency and partnership through recitation,
group case study analysis and quizzes.
LO4 Individual 20% 10%
Craft comprehensive and cohesive case digests.
LO5 Individual 10%
Prepare and draft legal documents related to
contracts of agency and partnership
LO6 Group 10%
Research and propose possible amendments
to the existing legal provisions on agency and
partnership.
Other Requirements
Midterm Examination 40% 20%
Final Examination 30%
TOTAL 100%
3
LEARNING PLAN:
WEEK/ LEARNING
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING
DATE METHODS
(arrangement or RESOURCES
(Schedule of (activities designed or
sequence of the major (print and non-print each Topic, deployed by the teacher
topics is based on a materials and online/ Assign, Exam to bring about, or
logical order) open-access
for the entire create the conditions
resources)
semester) for learning)
Course Introduction
Course overview Day 1
Course assignments Syllabus
Course requirements
4
WEEK/ LEARNING
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING
DATE METHODS
(arrangement or RESOURCES
(Schedule of (activities designed or
sequence of the major (print and non-print each Topic, deployed by the teacher
topics is based on a materials and online/ Assign, Exam to bring about, or
logical order) open-access
for the entire create the conditions
resources)
semester) for learning)
AFISCO
Insurance Corp.
Topic 5: PARTNERSHIP vs. CA, 302 SCRA
DISTINGUISHED 1
FROM OTHER
ORGANIZATIONS OR
ASSOCIATIONS
5
WEEK/ LEARNING
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING
DATE METHODS
(arrangement or RESOURCES
(Schedule of (activities designed or
sequence of the major (print and non-print each Topic, deployed by the teacher
topics is based on a materials and online/ Assign, Exam to bring about, or
logical order) open-access
for the entire create the conditions
resources)
semester) for learning)
Uy vs. Puzon, 79
SCRA 598 Assessment Quiz2
Catalan vs.
Gatchalian, 105
Phil. 1270
6
WEEK/ LEARNING
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING
DATE METHODS
(arrangement or RESOURCES
(Schedule of (activities designed or
sequence of the major (print and non-print each Topic, deployed by the teacher
topics is based on a materials and online/ Assign, Exam to bring about, or
logical order) open-access
for the entire create the conditions
resources)
semester) for learning)
Vda. de Chan
Diaco vs. Peng,
53 Phil. 906
Compania
Maritima vs.
Muñoz, 9 Phil.
326
Santiago Syjuico,
Inc. vs. Castro,
175 SCRA 171
Laguna
Transportation
Co., Inc. vs. SSS,
107 Phil. 833
MIDTERM EXAMINATION
7
WEEK/ LEARNING
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING
DATE METHODS
(arrangement or RESOURCES
(Schedule of (activities designed or
sequence of the major (print and non-print each Topic, deployed by the teacher
topics is based on a materials and online/ Assign, Exam to bring about, or
logical order) open-access
for the entire create the conditions
resources)
semester) for learning)
Small Group
Discussion (compare
actual companies
and/or industries that
have limited
partnership
arrangements,
applying thereto the
provisions of the
Civil Code)
Drafting of
partnership
contracts
Module 6 Textbooks Week 6 Live lecture with
Reference discussion
Materials (presentation to be
Topic 1: NATURE, Jurisprudence: provided by the
FORM and KINDS OF Apex Mining Co., teacher)
AGENCY Inc. vs. Southeast
Mindanao Gold Recitation
Mining Corp., 492
SCRA 355 Drafting of agency
Topic 2: OBLIGATIONS contracts
OF THE AGENT Rallos vs. Felix
Go Chan & Sons Case analysis
Realty Corp., 18
SCRA 251
Eurotech
Industrial
Technologies, Inc.
vs. Cuizon, 521
SCRA 584
8
WEEK/ LEARNING
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING
DATE METHODS
(arrangement or RESOURCES
(Schedule of (activities designed or
sequence of the major (print and non-print each Topic, deployed by the teacher
topics is based on a materials and online/ Assign, Exam to bring about, or
logical order) open-access
for the entire create the conditions
resources)
semester) for learning)
Baltazar vs.
Ombudsman, 510
SCRA 74
Far Eastern
Export * Import
Co. vs. Lim Teck
Suan, 97 Phil. 171
American Rubber
Co. vs. CIR, 64
SCRA 569
Jai-Alai Corp. of
the Phils. Vs. BPI,
66 SCRA 29
9
WEEK/ LEARNING
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING
DATE METHODS
(arrangement or RESOURCES
(Schedule of (activities designed or
sequence of the major (print and non-print each Topic, deployed by the teacher
topics is based on a materials and online/ Assign, Exam to bring about, or
logical order) open-access
for the entire create the conditions
resources)
semester) for learning)
432
Commercial Bank
& Trust Co. vs.
Republic Armored
Car Service
Corp., 8 SCRA
425
Woodchild
Holdings, Inc. vs.
Roxas Electric &
Construction Co.,
Inc. 436 SCRA
235
10
WEEK/ LEARNING
TOPIC/CONTENT LEARNING
DATE METHODS
(arrangement or RESOURCES
(Schedule of (activities designed or
sequence of the major (print and non-print each Topic, deployed by the teacher
topics is based on a materials and online/ Assign, Exam to bring about, or
logical order) open-access
for the entire create the conditions
resources)
semester) for learning)
Bacaling vs.
Muya, 380 SCRA
714
FINAL EXAMINATION
9TH
WEEK
11
Economy of the context considers the considers the be a shotgun
Language within which the context within context within response. Less
(35%) question was which the which the than 75% of the
asked, complete question was question was response
without being asked, lacked asked, lacked addresses the
verbose clarity and focus, clarity and question.
(16%-20%) included details did not weed out (1%-5%)
not otherwise the important
asked detail from the
(11%-15%) non-important
ones
(6%-10%)
Legal Basis The given The given The given The answer
and answer answer answer considers given does not
Integration considers both considers both both the law and provide legal
(30%) the law and the law and relevant facts but basis, or does
relevant facts or relevant facts or missed in its not integrate the
has basis, wider has basis, but application, or facts to the law.
scope of failed to cited a wrong (1%-5%)
knowledge completely legal basis to
about the law, integrate the law justify the
including the to the facts answer
co-relation of gvien (6%-10%)
laws and (11%-15%)
concepts that
applies to the
given situation.
(16%-20%)
TOTAL
12
questions
given.
(50%)
Application The The legal basis The legal basis The
of Law application of cited is correct cited is relevant application of
the correct but is not to the issue or law is
The ability to legal basis is properly problem but is incorrect.
properly apply properly applied to the not properly
the relevant applied to the issue or applied to the
provision/s of issue or problem. issue or
law, as well as problem. problem.
jurisprudence,
to the
question/s
given.
(30%)
Clarity of Cohesive, Cohesive and Unclear but Unclear,
Answer, consistent and clear, but shows some incohesive
Delivery and clear. answer degree of and
Expression contains cohesion in the inconsistent.
certain presentation of
(20%) inconsistencies ideas.
TOTAL
MAIN REFERNCE: Republic Act No. 386 (Civil Code of the Philippines), as amended.
TEXTBOOKS:
De Leon, Hector. Comments and Cases on Partnership, Agency and Trusts. (Manila:
Rex Book Store, 2010).
Jurado, Desiderio. Civil Law Reviewer (Manila, Rex Book Store, 2012).
WEB RESOURCES:
https://www.chanrobles.com
https://www.sc.judiciary.gov.ph
Prepared by:
13
ATTY. ALDEN REUBEN LUNA
Faculty, Department of Legal Management, College of Arts and Sciences
Approved by:
Signature
PROF. CHRISTIAN BRYAN S. BUSTAMANTE, Ph. D.
Dean, College of Arts and Sciences
14