Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RABIYA SHABBIR
FATIMA TARIQ-014
MUQADAS WASEEM-033
MAHRUKH ISRAR-028
SEMESTER: 8TH
1
TABLE OF CONTENT
Agroecological practices 8
2. and sustainable agriculture
Examples of agroecological Muqadas Wasim 9
practices 11
Role of biodiversity in
ecological agriculture 13
Nature of biodiversity in
agroecosystem
3.
Faiza
Benefits of Agro-ecology 14
4. Agro-ecology and SDGs 16
Key issues for agro-ecological Transition Mahrukh Israr 19
Agro-ecology: Farming for a better future 21
5. References
2
AGROECOLOGY:
Ecology is the study of how people, animals, plants, and their environments interact with one
another as well as how these interactions are balanced. The use of ecological principles and
concepts in farming is known as agroecology. A notable illustration of agroecology is
agroforestry. Farming that "focuses on food production that makes the best use of nature's
goods and services while not damaging these resources" is known as agroecology (pronounce
it: a-gr-kä-l-j). The study of ecological processes as they relate to agricultural production
systems is what it entails. By applying ecological concepts to agroecosystems, new
management strategies that could not have been thought of otherwise could be suggested.
Work with wildlife - managing the impact of farming on wildlife and harnessing
nature to do the hard work for us, such as pollinating crops and controlling pests.
3
Put farmers and communities in the driving seat - they give power to approaches
led by local people and adapt agricultural techniques to suit the local area - and its
specific social, environmental and economic conditions.
HISTORY OF AGROECOLOGY:
Agroecology first appeared within the scientific literature in the 1930s as a combination
of two traditional disciplines, agronomy and ecology, to study biological interactions
between crops and other natural elements of the agro-ecosystem (Agroecology Info Pool,
2019).
From the 1960s through the 1970s, this branch of inquiry expanded its scale of analysis
(from plot to farm to landscape level), integrating other disciplines, and broadening its
scope. (Interdisciplinary approach including socioeconomic and political considerations).
The study of indigenous agricultures, which regularly contained methods to adapt crops
to the variability of the natural environment and to protect them from predators and
competition without the need of external inputs, had an impact on those researchers.
Practitioners are beginning to consider the value of valuing indigenous agricultural
expertise. In parallel, the emergence of the ecologist movement, fuelled by the realization
of the negative impacts of the green revolution, supported the early adoption of
agroecological practices among some farmer communities.
In the 80s, it has provided a conceptual framework for the increasing promotion of
agroecological practices both in developed and developing countries. Social advocates
and grassroots movements are increasingly standing against industrial food system and in
favor of small-scale farmers.
The entire food system, which is referred to as a worldwide network of food production,
distribution, and consumption, has been incorporated by the agroecological framework
since the 2000s. Agroecology is currently being promoted, discussed, and appropriated by
4
new actors in numerous forums. As evidenced by continental networks of academics,
students, practitioners, and supporters, as well as the momentum around symposiums and
forums, agroecology has recently begun to coalesce. For instance, a few
intergovernmental organizations, reputable scientific organizations, or multi-stakeholder
bodies developed definitions that were universally accepted (e.g. Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations (FAO), United Nations Environment Programme
(UNEP), World Health Organization (WHO), Committee on World Food Security (CFS),
High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE)) (Agroecology Info
Pool, 2019).
5
Pakistan is a natural resource–based economy, with almost half of its total land area (36
million ha) dedicated to agriculture. Approximately 84% of land is classified as arable and
14% as permanent meadows or pastures. The country’s forested area represents only 2% of
total land compared to the world average of over 30% and is declining at a rate of 0.2-0.5%
per year. Deforestation driven by urbanization, a rural reliance on fuel wood, and poor land
planning has been linked with socioeconomic vulnerability and a lack of effective policy and
monitoring mechanisms to protect forests (Agriculture, 2023b).
Pakistan is a nation with a variety of ecologies. There are tall mountains and valleys scattered
throughout the north. The fertile Indus Plain, which is 1287 km long and 322 km wide with a
1.0 percent gradient from north to south, follows the Pothwar Plateau in the direction to the
south. The Baluchistan Plateau makes up the majority of the western portion, which is
bounded on the north-east by high to low mountains. The Thal desert, located in the upper
section of the basin, and the Thar desert, located in the southeast, are both sandy deserts.
Along the nation's southernmost border, in the Rann of Kutch, are marshy lands. PARC
(1980) and Muhammad (1986) have delineated the country into ten agroecological
zones/regions of Pakistan mainly on the basis of physiographic and on climate, soil type and
agricultural land use. The main agro-ecological zones of Pakistan are the following;
1. Indus Delta
2. Southern Irrigated Plain
3. Sandy Desert
4. Northern irrigated Plain
5. Barani (rainfall)
6. Wet Mountains
7. Northern dry mountains
8. Western Dry Mountains
9. Dry western Plateau
10. Sulaiman Piedmont
By establishing agro-ecological zones for the selection of ideal crop growing sites for the
nation's major and minor crops, the initiative aims to assure national food security. The
project's specific goals are to use geospatial techniques to create spatial and attribute data on
agro-climate, crop patterns, and socio-economic factors. Recognizing and evaluating recent
6
changes to Pakistan's climate, cropping patterns, and land usage. Updating agro-ecological
regions to choose appropriate crops to grow and to produce cattle.
7
Efficiency: Innovative agroecological practices produce more using
less external resources.
Agro ecological practices are agricultural practices that are aimed to produce significant
amounts of food which valorise in the best way
ecological processes and ecosystem services in
8
incorporating them as fundamental elements in the development of the practices and not
simply relying on regular techniques, such as chemical fertilizer and synthetic pesticide
application or technological solutions, such as genetically modified organisms. Indeed, agro
ecological practices contribute to improving the sustainability of agro ecosystems while being
based on various ecological processes and ecosystem services such as nutrient cycling,
biological Nitrogen fixation, natural regulation of pests, soil and water conservation,
biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration. Some of these practices have already
been applied in varying disciplines in different regions of the world for years or decades,
while others were more recently developed and still have a limited rate of application (Wezel
et al., 2014).
Building soil structure, improving soil health, recycling nutrients and ensuring local
sourcing.
Conserving and using water efficiently.
Sustaining and improving functional diversity (both on a spatial and a temporal scale).
9
Mixing crops in a single plot such as intercropping and poly-cultures: biological
complementarities improve nutrient and input efficiency, use of space and pest
regulation, thus enhancing crop yield stability.
Crop rotation and fallowing: nutrients are conserved from one season to the next
and the life cycles of insect pests, diseases, and weeds are interrupted.
Cover crops and mulching: reduce erosion, provide nutrients to the soil and enhance
biological control of pests.
10
pests and reduce environmental and health hazards caused by the use of chemical
control.
Agro-forestry: especially the use of multifunctional trees maintains and improves soil
fertility through nitrogen fixation, enhances soil structure and modifies the
microclimate.
Use of local resources and renewable energy sources, composting and waste
recycling: allows a reduction in the use of external inputs as well diminishing
pressure on the natural resource base.
(Silici., 2014).
Biodiversity refers to all species of plants, animals and micro-organisms existing and
interacting within an ecosystem. Natural biodiversity has provided the foundation for all
11
agricultural plants and animals. The entire range of the domestic crops used in world
agriculture is derived from wild species that have been modified through domestication,
selective breeding and hybridization. Most remaining world centers of diversity contain
populations of variable and adaptable landraces as well as wild and weedy relatives of crops,
all of which provide valuable genetic resources for crop improvement. In agricultural
systems, biodiversity performs ecosystem services beyond production of food, fiber, fuel, and
income. Examples include recycling of nutrients, control of local microclimate, regulation of
local hydrological processes, regulation of the abundance of undesirable organisms, and
detoxification of noxious chemicals. These renewal processes and ecosystem services are
largely biological, therefore their persistence depends upon maintenance of biological
diversity (Altieri, 1994). When these natural services are lost due to biological simplification,
the economic and environmental costs can be quite significant. Economically, in agriculture
the burdens include the need to supply crops with costly external inputs, because agro
ecosystems deprived of basic regulating functional components lack the capacity to sponsor
their own soil fertility and pest regulation. Often the costs involve a reduction in the quality
of life due to decreased soil, water, and food quality when pesticide and/or nitrate
contamination occurs. Thus modern agricultural systems have become productive but only by
being highly dependent on external inputs. A growing number of scientists, farmers and the
general public fear for the long-term sustainability of such highly input-dependent and
ecologically simplified food production systems.
When ecosystems are diverse, there are many pathways for ecological processes, so if one is
damaged or destroyed, an alternative pathway can be used. If native biological diversity is
diminished, the functioning of ecosystem is also at risk. There are many types of biological
resources that are bound to agriculture such as genetic resources, edible plants and crops,
livestock, soil organisms, wild resources and naturally occurring insects, bacteria and fungi.
Functional biodiversity includes those organisms that provide key processes and their
interactions can contribute to nutrient cycling, biological regulation and increased
productivity.
There are many mechanisms of biodiversity loss such as habitat destruction and
fragmentation; the displacement of native varieties by introduced modern varieties, air, water
and soil pollution, climate change, industrial agriculture and forest plantation. Agroecology
exploits not only variety of crops and animals but also the many ways by which farmers
exploit biological diversity to produce and manage agroecosystem. Higher diversity within
12
cropping system leads to higher diversity in associated biota that can lead to more effective
natural pest control and pollination.
Biodiversity enhance the performance and function of farms because different species or
genotypes perform different functions and so have different niches. There are many more
species than there are functions and thus redundancy is built into the agroecosystem.
Biodiversity enhances function of agroecosystem because those components that are
redundant at one point becomes important when some environmental changes occur. A
diversity of species acts as a buffer against failure due to environmental fluctuations by
increasing the compensation capacity of agroecosystem because if one species fail, other can
play their role (Alteiri., 2015).
The type and abundance of biodiversity in agriculture will differ across agroecosystems
which differ in age, diversity, structure and management. In fact, there is great variability in
basic ecological and agronomic patterns among the various dominant agroecosystems. In
general, the degree of biodiversity in agroecosystems depends on four main characteristics of
the agroecosystem.
13
The biodiversity components of agroecosystems can be classified in relation to the role they
play in the functioning of cropping systems. According to this, agricultural biodiversity can
be grouped as follows:
Productive biota: crops, trees and animals chosen by farmers which play a
determining role in the diversity and complexity of the agroecosystem.
Resource biota: organisms that contribute to productivity through pollination,
biological control, decomposition, etc.
Destructive biota: weeds, insect pests, microbial pathogens, etc. which farmers aim
at reducing through cultural management (Alteiri., 1999).
BENEFITS OF AGRO-ECOLOGY
Agro-ecology is an all-around, environmentally friendly way to farm that is good for farmers,
the environment, and consumers. Below I list some of the benefits of the agro-ecology:
It is important to keep the delicate balance between people and the environment by protecting
natural resources and biodiversity. Agro-ecology offers us the opportunity to do just
this. Agro-ecology is a way of farming that looks at the whole picture and uses ecological
principles in everyday tasks like managing soils and saving water. With the help of agro-
ecology, farmers can use less chemical fertilizers and pesticides, which can have a big
negative effect on ecosystems.
14
Agro-ecology enhances the resilience of rural people.
Agro-ecology is a powerful tool that can help rural communities grow and thrive, even
though they face many problems. This type of farming takes into account the way ecosystems
work on farms and in the areas around them. This helps keep biodiversity and builds
community knowledge.
By emphasizing local innovation and traditional practices, agro-ecology helps empower rural
people with greater self-determination by providing access to proper resources,
environmental services, and good health. Agro-ecology not only builds up organic soils and
saves water, but it also helps more kinds of life grow and encourages the use of land in a
sustainable way. It preserves pollinators like bees and birds, which in turn support food
production (Important benefits of agro-ecology , 2023 ).
Agro-ecology is the practice of designing and running farming systems based on ecological
principles. It gives us a very important tool for dealing with big problems like global food
insecurity, adapting to climate change, and protecting biodiversity.
By using this type of sustainable and resilient food production, we are better able to protect,
restore, and improve existing agriculture and food systems in the face of challenges like
climate shocks and other stressors.
Agro-ecology is the practice of making sustainable agricultural and forestry operations more
interconnected with their environments. This entails taking a holistic approach to farming,
including looking at ecological and social aspects.
In today’s world, where there is an emphasis on eco-friendly practices and eating locally
sourced food, agro-ecology is becoming increasingly popular for its ability to reduce
environmental impacts and support shorter supply chains between farmers and consumers.
Shorter supply chains bridge the gap between producers and eaters, meaning farmers can be
sure that their products are going directly to those who need them, while consumers can be
100% certain of their food’s quality and freshness. It’s win-win!
15
AGRO-ECOLOGY AND THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGS)
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development calls for a new agricultural approach to
ensure sufficient, safe and nutritious food respecting human rights.
Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
By minimizing the use of potentially harmful agro-chemical inputs,
agroecology reduces agriculture’s negative effects on both human and
environmental health. By re-localizing diets, agroecology can help to
inform sustainable and healthy diets.
Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning
opportunities for all
Agroecology depends on knowledge adapted to local contexts by food producers and
other actors. It delivers relevant and practical knowledge through empowering peer-to-
peer systems, enhanced with the knowledge of formal scientists (Agroecology and
sustainable development goals , 2023).
16
systems, from the home, to the field, to the market and beyond. Agroecology has the potential
to advance women’s rights, self-determination and autonomy.
17
Agroecology enhances diversification to achieve sustainable and healthy diets and food and
nutrition security. Agroecological food systems have proven, in many local contexts, to be
exemplary providers of high-quality nutritious, healthy and adequate diets, preserving and
promoting local food traditions and traditional knowledge. By shortening value chains, agro-
ecology contributes to the reduction of food losses and waste.
Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources
for sustainable development
In aquatic systems, the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAF) and to
aquaculture (EAA) demonstrates an agro-ecological approach. The
Ecosystem Approach ensures that the management of living resources
applies an integrated approach to fisheries within meaningful boundaries, taking into account
knowledge and uncertainties in the biotic, abiotic and human components.
18
Agro-ecology supports strong and inclusive producers’ organisations that enable the sharing
and co-creation of knowledge, solidarity, representation of their concerns at the policy level
and responsible governance.
Three broad themes of clusters of barriers and drivers were derived from analysis of the
inventory of barriers and driver:
The most commonly identified barrier is the lack of knowledge of specific agro-ecological
practices and their sustainability benefits, and the economic opportunities and associated
uncertainties for creating added value from agro-ecologically produced goods. Such barriers
reflect the knowledge intensive character of agro-ecological farming. These barriers relate
mainly to a lack of knowledge amongst farmers, and highlight the need for specialized
knowledge for advisors and teachers working in vocational schools. Two main constraints for
farm advisory services need to be considered; they can be underfinanced or they have
difficulties in recruiting qualified advisors. A related weakness is one of limited coordination
amongst AKIS actors, and the lack of networks for knowledge sharing involving farmers,
advisors and researchers.
In many cases, there was evidence of barriers to agro-ecological transitions due to a low
capacity and willingness to cooperate which, in turn, was due to weak social capital and
individualism of, and rivalry between farmers. The lack of confidence and trust in
agricultural cooperatives, and resulting low willingness to cooperate, is closely linked to
19
economic barriers. For example, a lack of willingness to cooperate may inhibit options for
shared purchasing of storage and processing infrastructure, or direct marketing.
Barriers which were commonly identified were related to the economic sustainability of agro-
ecological farming within the framework of the current conventional food systems. A lack of
access to finance and other issues related to investments were the most common barriers. A
diverse set of issues relating to the lack of value added by agro ecological production was
identified, including low demand and productivity was expressed by low prices rather than
production costs, which led to issues in logistics of storing, processing and selling the agro
ecological products. The availability of labour and market concentration were also identified
as significant issue.
Specific barriers due to policies covered the unsustainable prescriptions and lack of flexibility
in implementation and monitoring. This cluster included the bureaucracy of the policy
support, and lack of targeting or public procurement.
The clusters of barriers and drivers provided a means of viewing the challenges to agro-
ecological transition from specific angles that inform the identification of specific actions in
the strategic pathways, as well as the analysis of market and policy instruments that can foster
transition process. However, the different barriers and drivers do not occur in isolation. The
existence of some barriers reinforces the pace at which other barriers develop over time. The
studies demonstrate the interconnectedness between different barriers, and that the issue of
information, economy and policy are intimately linked.
Addressing these different barriers requires the involvement of actors with different roles and
representing multiple interests and innovative form of coordination and cooperation. In
particular cases characterized by a low level of cooperation between actors and at an initial
stage of agro-ecological transition, authorities are key actors which are in position to initiate,
manage and direct governance networks towards the agro-ecological pathways. In addition,
charismatic farmers, advisors and NGOs, are also important when the network is new and
subject to change, multi-stakeholder hubs are the core of more mature and stable networks
(KEY ISSUES AND STRATEGIES FOR AGRO-ECOLOGICAL TRANSITIONS, 2018).
20
We need a paradigm shift in the way food is produced in the world. This is recognised by the
United Nations’ organisation for food and agriculture (FAO) and by numerous other agencies
and scientists. And is underscored by the current health crisis the world is battling and its
impacts on our food supply chains.
It is not viable to put our faith solely in technological innovation to save the day, however
tempting. We will undoubtedly benefit from technological advances and we will need to
harness the potential of new machinery and digitalisation for people and planet. But the main
innovation needed is social and knowledge-based.
The industrial farming model is not fit for purpose. Its insatiable use of finite resources, its
countless adverse impacts on the health of humans and ecosystems and its dependence on
fossil fuels and chemical inputs render it fundamentally unsustainable. And it cannot be fixed
by some tweaks in the margins and better technology. An essentially different paradigm for
how we think about farming is urgently needed. And this could well be agro-ecology.
Agro-ecology is not any particular production system, but rather an approach that relies on,
and maximises, ecological processes to support production systems; it is a way of thinking
holistically about agronomy, ecology and biology. To produce food in harmony with nature,
not against it.
Agroecology is a good answer to the countless environmental issues emanating from the food
we eat. In an agroecological future, we would also naturally eat more healthily. We would eat
more plant-based foods and less but better meat, seafood, eggs and dairy. This would,
simultaneously, counter environmental degradation and the many diet-related non-
communicable diseases (cardiovascular diseases, obesity, diabetes, different types of cancer)
on the rise in the EU and in the world.
Transition to agro-ecology worldwide can also improve our food security. Research has
shown that Europe can feed itself based on fully agro-ecological agriculture, on the condition
that we shift towards healthier, more plant-based diets. In developing countries, moving
towards agro-ecology could actually increase yields and contribute to climate change
adaptation. In addition, moving towards a food system that had a positive ecological footprint
can benefit our health, by reducing pollution and reducing the risk of new diseases.
Apart from generating a higher farm income, one study found that agro-ecological farms
“also provide more employment per hectare (thus supporting regional economies), use less
21
fossil fuel and make positive contributions towards the maintenance of scenic landscapes and
biodiversity”, the latter benefiting tourism (Agroecology; farming for better future , 2020).
REFERENCES:
Agroecology; farming for better future . (2020, 03 24). Retrieved from meta from the
eeb : https://meta.eeb.org/2020/03/24/agroecology-farming-for-a-better-future/
Key issues and strategies for agro-ecological transitions. (2018). Retrieved from
uniseco; agroecological kowledge hub : https://uniseco-project.eu/akh/governments-
and-administration/key-issues-and-strategies-for-agro-ecological-transitions
Silici, L. (2015). Agroecology. What it is and what it has to offer. Food and
Agriculture.
Wezel, A., Casagrande, M., Celette, F., & Francois, V.J. (2014). Agroecological
practices for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. (2014) 34:1–20.
DOI 10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7
22
Important benefits of agro-ecology . (2023 ). Retrieved from Basic agricultural Study :
https://agriculturistmusa.com/benefits-of-agroecology/#Agroecology_preserves_natural_
resources_and_biodiversity
Agroecology and sustainable development goals . (2023). Retrieved from Agroecology
knowledge Hub : https://www.fao.org/agroecology/overview/agroecology-and-the-
sustainable-development-goals/en/
23