Good evening, our moderator, members of the opposing team, and teachers.

Today, we the negative

side wants to express our opposition to the idea of abolishing mother tongue language education in
schools. While it may seem like a reasonable solution to promoting a common language and culture,
it could have detrimental effects on the well-being and academic success of students.

Firstly, mother tongue education provides a sense of identity and cultural pride for students. Students
who are taught in their mother tongue are more likely to develop a positive sense of self and a deeper
understanding and appreciation of their cultural heritage. They help individuals connect with their
roots and understand their history, which is important for personal and social development. This is
essential for building strong and diverse communities, and for promoting social cohesion. Two
examples are South Korea and Japan. South Korea and Japan are both progressive countries and they
have a very strong cultural preservation until today. They are internationally competent even while
using their local language.

Secondly, abolishing mother tongue education could have a negative impact on academic
performance. Studies have shown that students who are taught in their mother tongue perform better
academically, particularly in subjects such as literacy and numeracy. This is because students are
more likely to understand and retain information when it is presented in their first language.

Thirdly, mother tongue education can also be beneficial for students who are learning a second
language. Research has shown that students who are proficient in their mother tongue are more likely
to learn a second language successfully. This is because they have a solid foundation in language and
literacy skills, which can be transferred to a new language.

Lastly, abolishing mother tongue education could also have negative social and economic
consequences. Students who are not taught in their mother tongue may be less likely to continue their
education, leading to lower levels of academic achievement and reduced employment opportunities.
This could also lead to a loss of cultural diversity and an increase in social tensions.

In conclusion, abolishing mother tongue language education in schools could have detrimental
effects on the well-being and academic success of students, as well as negative social and economic
consequences. It is important to promote a common language and culture, but not at the expense of
students' identity, academic success, and cultural heritage. As a society, we should strive to promote
bilingualism and multilingualism, and provide students with access to high-quality education in their
mother tongue. Thank you.
Enter

Ladies and gentlemen, Today, I want to express my opposition to the idea of legalizing euthanasia.
While it may seem like a compassionate solution for individuals who are suffering from terminal
illnesses, it raises many ethical and practical concerns that cannot be ignored.
Firstly is sufficient palliative care. Palliative care is a sufficient alternative to euthanasia as it focuses
on relieving pain and improving quality of life for terminally ill patients. Palliative care seeks to re-
assure people with terminal or chronic ailments that they are still worthy of living. It should be the
focus of the government so that, terminally and chronically ill persons can be adequately catered for
as they approach their end of life.

Secondly, there is no guarantee that legalizing euthanasia would actually improve end-of-life care for
patients. In fact, it may even discourage healthcare providers from offering palliative care and other
end-of-life services that could improve quality of life for terminally ill patients. Instead, it would put
pressure on healthcare professionals to end the lives of patients, rather than provide them with the
best possible care.

Thirdly, the legalization of euthanasia would have serious legal and practical implications.
Determining eligibility for euthanasia, ensuring that the individual is making an informed decision,
and preventing abuse and coercion would be incredibly difficult, if not impossible. It would also
create a complicated legal landscape, with potential lawsuits and challenges that could further harm
the individuals involved.

And lastly, It undermines the value of human life. We believe that Euthanasia can lead to a culture of
death that devalues human life. Legalizing euthanasia sends the message that human life is not
inherently valuable and can be ended at will.

As a society, we should focus on providing, if not exhaust, maximum care and support for
individuals who are facing terminal illnesses, rather than promoting the idea that some lives are not
worth living. Thank you

1.What is your position on the legalization of euthanasia and why?

2.How do you define euthanasia, and what conditions do you believe should be met before it is
considered?
3.Do you believe that individuals have the right to make their own decisions about their own lives,
including the decision to end their own suffering through euthanasia?
4.How would you ensure that euthanasia is only performed in cases where the patient is fully
informed and has made a voluntary, well-considered decision to end their life?
5. What measures would you propose to prevent the abuse of euthanasia, particularly in cases where
individuals may be coerced or pressured into making this decision?
6. How would you ensure that medical professionals who perform euthanasia are properly trained
and able to provide the necessary care and support to their patients?
7. How would you address concerns about the impact of euthanasia on vulnerable populations, such
as the elderly, disabled, or mentally ill?
8. How would you address concerns about the impact of euthanasia on society as a whole,
particularly in terms of its potential impact on attitudes towards death and dying?

9. How would you ensure that the legalization of euthanasia is consistent with other laws and
regulations related to end-of-life care, such as advance directives and palliative care?

10. How would you address concerns about the potential conflicts between religious or cultural
beliefs and the legalization of euthanasia?

With the points discussed by the Necessity, Beneficiality, and Practicability, we, the affirmative side
firmly believe that Euthanasia must be legalized in the Philippines. With that, I rest my case.