Professional Documents
Culture Documents
586-590, 1994
REVIEW
Male contraception: hormonal, mechanical and other
Frank H.Comhaire Until now no such contraceptive method has been available
(Waites, 1993). This is remarkable since spermatogenesis is
University Hospital Ghent, Department of Internal Medicine,
probably a more vulnerable process than ovulation (Giwercman
Section Endocrinology, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
and Skakkebaek, 1992). We suggest that this paradox can be
Methods of male contraception that have been developed so explained by our insufficient knowledge of the intimate
mechanisms regulating spermatogenesis and perhaps, the poorly
NEUROTRANSMITTERS
CORTEX ENDORPHINS HYPOTHALAMUS
(PROLACTIN)
STRESS
EXERTION
NUTRITION
CHOLESTEROL .— P Inhibin \
ABP (+>
0 • \ 5o(reductase — 5«DHT-{+>
SPERMATO-
RJ I (aromatase) — •-E, --O GENESIS
aromatase — substances - « -
Fig. 1. Hormonal regulation of spermatogenesis. E2 = oestradiol, LHRH = luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, LH = luteinizing
hormone, FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone, P5 = pregnenolone, T = testosterone, 5a-DHT = 5a-dihydrotestosterone, ABP =
androgen-binding protein, R = receptor.
process is controlled by the sympathetic nervous system and the addition, the side-effects of supra-physiological serum
activity of the accessory sex glands is androgen dependent. concentrations of testosterone must be considered, including
weight gain, gynaecomastia, lowering of high density
lipopoprotein cholesterol concentration and potentially increased
Hormonal male contraception
risk of atherogenesis, as well as prostatic hyperplasia (Bardin
Melo and Coutihno (1977) have reported reversible suppression etal., 1991).
of spermatogenesis by means of a combination of a progestogen- The advent of LHRH agonists has initiated studies combining
inhibiting pituitary secretion of gonadotrophins, and an androgen their down-regulating effect on gonadotrophin secretion with
to supplement testosterone deficiency. The treatment was testosterone supplementation. Results of this approach were
administered by monthly intra-muscular injections and resulted disappointing since the agonist seemed to blunt the suppressive
in temporary azoospermia. Immediate side-effects were reported effect caused by the androgen (Behre et al., 1992).
to be minimal, but data on long-term application are lacking. The latter did not take place when LHRH antagonists were
Several variant versions of this approach have been applied, used, and testosterone substitution was initiated after complete
including different doses of progestogen, percutaneous or oral suppression of the gonadotrophin secretion was obtained (Pavlou
delivery of the androgen, or the use of anabolic steroids (Hedman et al., 1989, 1991). The recent development of a long-acting
etal, 1988; Pangkahila, 1991; Nieschlag et al., 1992). Different testosterone ester (testosterone buciclate; Behre and Nieschlag,
rates of azoospermia are achieved in men of different ethnic 1992) and biodegradable testosterone microcapsules (Bhasin et
groups during treatment with these contraceptive steroids (Waites, al., 1992), which lack the initial peak release of testosterone,
1993). opens new avenues for male contraception. Provided that a
Suppression of gonadotrophin secretion with simultaneous suitable long-acting formulation of the LHRH antagonist can be
androgen supplementation can be obtained by the injection of developed which is free of side-effects, this approach may yield
supra-physiological doses of testosterone derivatives (Swerdloff an acceptable method of hormonal male contraception. The
et al., 1979). Severe or even complete suppression of spermato- remaining inconveniences are the relatively long duration needed
genesis is obtained, but 'escape' may occur, possibly due to the for full sperm recovery, the high cost of the treatment, and the
direct stimulatory effect of testosterone on spermatogenesis. In reduction of testicular volume. Also, available methods of
587
F.H.Comhaire
androgen supplementation do not mimic the nyctohemeral epididymal maturation of the spermatozoa. This approach was
variations of serum testosterone, the possible physiological not successful. Animal experiments suggest that inhibition of 5a-
implication of which is unknown. reductase activity by Finasteride is also ineffective in this respect.
588
Male contraception
contraception. In addition, the better knowledge of mechanisms and prostate cancer in US men. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 269, 873-877.
underlying normal spermatogenesis could reveal some hitherto Giovannucci,E., Tosteson,T.D., Speizer,F.E., Ascherio.A.,
unknown causes of idiopathic oligozoospermia. Vessey,M.P. and Colditz,G.A. (1993b) A retrospective cohort study
of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men. ./. Am. Med. Assoc.,
269, 878-882.
Conclusion Giwercman.A. and Skakkebaek.N.E. (1992) The human testis — an
organ at risk? (editorial). Int. J. Androl., 15, 373-375.
Both hormonal and mechanical methods for male contraception
Guess,H.A. (1990) Invited commentary: vasectomy and prostate cancer.
suffer from major drawbacks making them hardly acceptable for
Am. J. Epidemiol., 132, 1062-1065.
universal application. The most recent developments include the
Hakovirta.H., Penttila,T.L., Pollanen.P., Froysa,B., S6der,O. and
combination of an LHRH antagonist and a long-acting
Parvinen,M. (1993) Interleukin-1 bioactivity and DNA synthesis in
testosterone preparation with sustained androgen release. This X-irradiated rat testes. Int. J. Androl., 16, 159-164.
combination may yield an acceptable method of hormonal Healy.B. (1993) News from NIH: Does vasectomy cause prostate cancer?
contraception, at least for the near future. It is, however, only J. Am. Med. Assoc., 269, 2620.
through the better understanding of the intimate mechanisms of Hedman,M., Gottlieb,C, Svanborg,K., Bygdeman,M. and de la
spermatogenesis itself that more adequate methods of male Torre,B. (1988) Endocrine, seminal and peripheral effects of depot
contraception will develop. More efforts should be directed
590