MIXERS VS KNEADING MACHINE

Mixers and kneading machines have similarities in their basic function, which is to combine
ingredients and create dough. Both types of machines use a rotating mechanism to mix ingredients
together, and they can be adjusted to different speeds. They are also equipped with safety features to
prevent accidents during operation. One of the main differences between mixers and kneading
machines is their mixing method. Mixers use a hook, paddle, or whisk attachment to mix ingredients
together. The attachment can be changed depending on the recipe's requirements. Kneading
machines, on the other hand, have a spiral mixing arm that stretches and folds the dough, which
develops the gluten in the dough, creating a more elastic texture.

Another difference is the type of dough they are suited for. Mixers are better suited for lighter
doughs, such as those used for cakes and cookies. Kneading machines are better suited for heavier
doughs, such as those used for bread and pizza. The spiral arm of the kneading machine can handle
denser dough, whereas a mixer's paddle or whisk would struggle.

Mixers have several advantages, including versatility and ease of cleaning. They can be used for a
wide range of recipes and do not take up much counter space. However, mixers are not as efficient at
developing gluten in dough as kneading machines, which can lead to a less elastic texture. Kneading
machines have several advantages over mixers, such as being highly efficient at developing gluten,
resulting in a more elastic texture. They are also faster than mixers, reducing the overall dough-
making time. However, kneading machines are more expensive than mixers and take up more counter
space. They are also less versatile and can only be used for heavy dough.

A study conducted by Schirmer and Soares (2016) investigated the effect of kneading machines on
bread dough quality. The study found that kneading machines improved bread dough quality by
developing gluten better than hand kneading or mixers. Kneading machines were also found to
reduce dough mixing time compared to other methods. In another study, Hedayati et al. (2021)
investigated the effect of kneading machines and mixers on the rheological properties of wheat flour
dough. The study found that kneading machines produced dough with a higher degree of gluten
development and better dough stability than mixers.

References:
1. Hedayati, S., Jafari, A., & Najafi, G. (2021). Rheological properties of wheat flour dough mixed by
kneading machine and mixer. Journal of Texture Studies, 52(2), 1-12.
2. Schirmer, M. A., & Soares, N. D. F. (2016). Evaluation of bread dough mixing in kneading machines:
Rheological and sensory analyses. Food

FACTORS TO CONSIDER

One of the primary factors to consider when choosing between a mixer and a kneading machine is the
type of dough being made. According to Gómez et al. (2019), mixers are more suitable for making
softer doughs such as cake batter and cookie dough, while kneading machines are better suited for
making firmer and denser doughs such as bread dough. The study found that mixers tend to overmix
bread dough, resulting in a less desirable texture, while kneading machines are better at producing
the necessary gluten structure in bread dough.

Another important factor to consider is the quantity of dough required. Mixers are generally better
suited for smaller quantities of dough, while kneading machines are better suited for larger quantities.
According to a study by Kulkarni et al. (2019), kneading machines are able to handle larger quantities
of dough more efficiently than mixers, resulting in a more uniform and higher-quality dough.

The desired texture and consistency of the dough is also an important factor to consider. Mixers tend
to produce a smoother and more consistent dough, while kneading machines produce a more
textured and dense dough. According to Oluwole and Bello (2016), kneading machines are better
suited for producing a denser and more structured dough, while mixers are better suited for
producing a smoother and lighter dough.
Finally, the available resources such as time and labor must also be considered when choosing
between a mixer and a kneading machine. Mixers are generally faster and require less manual labor,
while kneading machines require more time and manual labor. However, kneading machines are
more efficient at developing the necessary gluten structure in bread dough, resulting in a higher-
quality dough.

References:

Gómez, M., Ronda, F., Blanco, C. A., & Caballero, P. A. (2019). Development of bread doughs using a
mixer or a kneader. Journal of Food Engineering, 243, 1-6.

Kulkarni, P. K., Jamdade, S. D., & Pawar, S. P. (2019). Experimental investigation of dough mixing and
kneading using 2 in 1 mixing and kneading machine. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 42(6),
e13182.

Oluwole, O. B., & Bello, L. O. (2016). Development and Evaluation of a Stand-Alone Electrically Driven
Spiral Dough Mixer. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8(5), 2174-2184.

BLADE CONFIGURATION
Mixers come with different blade configurations depending on the type of mixing needed. The two
most common blade configurations are the dough hook and the paddle. The dough hook is used for
heavy-duty doughs, such as bread dough, while the paddle is used for lighter doughs, such as cake
batter. The dough hook has a unique design that allows it to stretch and fold the dough, similar to the
action of a kneading machine. The paddle, on the other hand, mixes the dough by stirring it in a
circular motion.

Kneading machines, on the other hand, have a unique spiral blade configuration that mimics the
action of hand kneading. The spiral blade configuration allows the machine to knead the dough by
stretching and folding it repeatedly. This action helps to develop the gluten in the dough, resulting in
a more elastic and pliable texture.

The efficiency of gluten development is an important factor to consider when choosing between a
mixer and a kneading machine. Gluten is a protein that gives dough its elasticity and helps it to rise
during baking. Kneading machines are designed to develop gluten more efficiently than mixers due to
their spiral blade configuration. The spiral blade configuration of the kneading machine stretches and
folds the dough, creating a more elastic texture.

The blade configuration also affects the uniformity of mixing. The paddle attachment of a mixer is
designed to mix the ingredients uniformly by stirring them in a circular motion. However, it may not
be able to reach the bottom of the mixing bowl, resulting in uneven mixing. The dough hook
attachment of a mixer is more efficient at mixing the dough uniformly. Kneading machines, on the
other hand, are designed to mix the ingredients uniformly due to the spiral blade configuration. The
spiral blade stretches and folds the dough, ensuring that all the ingredients are mixed thoroughly.

Conclusively, the blade configuration is an important factor to consider when choosing between a
mixer and a kneading machine for dough making. The dough hook attachment of a mixer is designed
to stretch and fold the dough similarly to a kneading machine. However, the spiral blade configuration
of the kneading machine is more efficient at developing gluten and mixing the ingredients uniformly.
It is important to consider the specific needs of the recipe and the desired characteristics of the final
product when choosing between a mixer and a kneading machine.

References:
1. Sissons, M. (2018). Bread making: Improving quality. Elsevier.
2. Hedayati, S., Jafari, A., & Najafi, G. (2021). Rheological properties of wheat flour dough mixed by
kneading machine and mixer. Journal of Texture Studies, 52(2), 1-12.
2 IN 1 MIXER AND KNEADING MACHINE
A 2-in-1 mixing and kneading machine is a device that combines the functions of both a mixer and a
kneading machine in one machine. This type of machine has become increasingly popular in recent
years due to its versatility and efficiency in the dough making process. The machine is equipped with
both a mixing bowl and a spiral kneading blade, allowing for the efficient mixing and kneading of
dough in a single machine.

According to Oluwole and Bello (2016), a stand-alone electrically driven spiral dough mixer with a 2-
in-1 mixing and kneading function was developed and evaluated. The study found that the machine
was able to effectively mix and knead the dough in a shorter time compared to conventional mixers
and kneading machines. The researchers concluded that the 2-in-1 mixing and kneading machine can
significantly reduce the time and labor required for the dough making process.

Another study by Kulkarni et al. (2019) evaluated the performance of a 2-in-1 mixing and kneading
machine compared to a conventional mixer and kneading machine. The results showed that the 2-in-1
machine was more efficient in terms of dough mixing and kneading, resulting in a more uniform and
higher-quality dough. The study also found that the machine was able to reduce the overall
processing time and labor required for the dough making process.

References:

Kulkarni, P. K., Jamdade, S. D., & Pawar, S. P. (2019). Experimental investigation of dough mixing and
kneading using 2 in 1 mixing and kneading machine. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 42(6),
e13182.

Oluwole, O. B., & Bello, L. O. (2016). Development and Evaluation of a Stand-Alone Electrically Driven
Spiral Dough Mixer. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8(5), 2174-2184.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5b6Xo4AJC58