Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Formulating Counterclaims
To be an effective critical thinker, it is not enough just to
be able to identify claims and assertions. The ability to analyze
an argument is essential to understanding the text more
deeply, but understanding the claim is not the only facet of the
argument. You must also learn how to analyze the
counterclaims and evidence provided by the text.
Being able to recognize and formulate counterclaims in
reaction to an argument is a characteristic of a good critical
reader. Counterclaims are claims made to rebut a previous
claim. They provide a contrasting perspective to the main
argument.
By being able to locate and provide counterclaims to an
argument, you show a deep competence and familiarity with
the writer’s topic. It shows that you are examining different
perspectives and not just passively accepting the writer’s
claim. It shows that you have thoroughly considered the topic,
and are willing to engage different viewpoints from your own,
thus remaining objective. It also helps you clarify what your
personal position is on the topic.
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
C. Evaluating Claims
Based on the given characteristics above, evaluate the
following claims. Place a check () on the blank beside the
number if you consider the example a good claim. Otherwise,
on the space provided, state what can be improved in the
given example.
D. Identifying Claims
Identify each statement below, taken from or inspired
by the previous text, as a claim of fact, value, or policy. Briefly
explain your choice.
F. Identifying Assertions
Statement of fact:
_____________________________________________
Statement of convention:
_____________________________________________
Statement of opinion:
_____________________________________________
Statement of preference:
_____________________________________________
H.Formulating Counterclaims
Application
Imagine that you are an editor for your school paper. Your
teacher has given you the freedom to choose any opinion
article about the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
(ASEAN) Integration. It can be from any discipline such as
science or social studies. You are tasked to review your
chosen article; it can be featured in the next issue of the
school paper. Your critique should consist of 1,000 words. A
good review will identify the claim of the text, describe its
context, and evaluate the evidence provided.
Evaluation
By now you have a good idea of what it means to be a
critical reader. One way of knowing how well your skills have
developed is by devising a rubric evaluating one particular
skill in critical reading that you have just learned.
Go back to the previous lesson and select a skill (e.g.,
formulating counterclaims, determining textual evidence) that
you think is the most important and fundamental in becoming
a critical reader. Afterward, create a rubric with five to seven
criteria that you believe a critical reader must meet to use a
particular skill effectively. A good rubric will have
comprehensive criteria, a grading scale, a descriptions for
corresponding points accumulated.
UNIT TEST
In your own words, answer the questions below to review
the key concepts in this Unit.
1. How would you define reading?