Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ielts Writing Answer Sheet
Ielts Writing Answer Sheet
I. SAU KHI HOÀN THÀNH XONG BÀI EM SẼ TRẢ LỜI NHỮNG CÂU HỎI SAU
Nếu chưa thì em đang yếu điểm gì? Em đang yếu về việc không biết kết hợp các ý trong bài viết sao cho hợp lí và không
SAU KHI ĐÃ HOÀN THÀNH BÀI VIẾT, EM TRẢ LỜI THÀNH THẬT NHỮNG CÂU HỎI SAU ( phải trả lời
1. Số chữ viết đã viết trong bài này (Em lưu ý là Task 1 nên viết 160 words, Task 2 nên viết 300 words. Nếu viết
2. Viết có kịp thời gian không (Nếu em viết không kịp, em nhớ đọc link hướng dẫn phân bố này
3. Trong lúc viết có tra từ điển không (Không nên tra từ điển lúc viết, thời điểm em nên tra sẽ là lúc chị trả bài,
4. Trước khi hết thời gian làm bài có dành 5 phút để check lại lỗi chính tả, grammar, từ vựng không (Cố gắng
luyện tập như lúc đi thi, phải luôn check lại 5 phút trước khi nộp, nếu viết không kịp cũng phải tập thói quen
check lỗi 5 phút, bài viết có hay mà sai nhiều lỗi chính tả, grammar cơ bản thì sẽ auto 5-6) ? Có ạ
5. Có dành 5-10 phút đầu lập dàn bài chưa (Nhớ học cách lập dàn bài https://www.ieltstutor.me/blog/lap-dan-y-
ielts-writing-task-one-task-two ) ?
6. Trong lúc lập dàn bài, có note lại những trường từ vựng đặc trưng trong topic của bài không (Trong 4 tiêu
Resources sẽ yêu cầu các em phải sử dụng cho được những từ vựng LIÊN QUAN TRỰC TIẾP ĐẾN TOPIC
7. Trong lúc lập dàn bài, có xác định những từ vựng chủ chốt, cần phải paraphrase trong đề bài chưa? Và có
note những từ vựng mà em đã paraphrase đó trong khi lập dàn bài không (Nếu chưa biết cách paraphrase
em đọc https://www.ieltstutor.me/blog/paraphrase) ?
8. Trong khi viết bài này em gặp khó khăn gì, về mặt phân tích đề ( task response) (Nhớ đọc kĩ
https://www.ieltstutor.me/blog/4-tieu-chi-cham-ielts-writing để biết tiêu chí Task Response là tiêu chí gì) bên
ielts-writing-task-two ?
9. Trong khi viết bài này em gặp khó khăn gì, về mặt phân tích đề ( về mặt từ vựng ) - (Để có nhiều IDEAS, em
nhớ chắt lọc những IDEAS ở đây vào Sổ tay từ vựng mà IELTS TUTOR sẽ cho em làm sau mỗi Topic
https://www.ieltstutor.me/blog/ideas-for-ielts) ?
10. Đã đọc kĩ ĐỀ BÀI chưa, phân tích các yếu tố trong đề bài chưa? Nếu đề bài cho ví dụ thì đã phân tích cái ví
dụ đó ở trong bài viết của mình chưa (Nhớ đọc kĩ cách chọn ví dụ để đưa vào bài thế nào cho đúng
II. BẮT ĐẦU TÍNH THỜI GIAN LÀM BÀI ( 40 PHÚT CHO TASK 2 - 20 PHÚT CHO TASK 1 )
Đề bài: Should goverment regulates the fast food industries in the same way that regulates the drug, alcohol and
tobacco industries.
2. Những từ trong đề mà em nghĩ sẽ phải Paraphrase & list những từ Paraphrase của từ đó ra
3. Có note lại những điểm ngữ pháp nào sẽ dùng trong bài viết để tối ưu điểm ngữ pháp không?
- So sánh hơn, các từ dùng để lên kết đoạn văn, sử dụng các đại từ quan hệ..
Bài viết của em ( luôn nhớ max 300 words cho Task 2, max 160 words cho Task 1)
https://www.ieltstutor.me/blog/cach-viet-dang-opinion-essay-ielts-witing-task-2
https://www.ieltstutor.me/blog/tu-vung-topic-food-health-sports-ielts
In today’s modern society, there has been heated discussion about whether or not government should regulate the fast
food industries in a similar way that drug, tobacco and alcohol ones are regulated. To my knowledge, the government
should not harshly prevent the fast food as same as the drug, alcohol and tobacco industry .
It is clear that fast food has an important role play in human life as well as the benefits of fast food for the social
purposes. Firstly, eating fast food is absolutely convenient, especially in term of the people do not have time to cook and
prepare. The fast food is very delectable and multiform, which makes many people easily choose their own favourite meal
as well as the unnecessary time-consuming to cook. For instance, I usually go for my favourite restaurant to eat fried
chicken, bubble tea … which is both cost-effective and useful when food coming at my doorstep without any delivery cost.
Despite the drawbacks of fast food sometimes indirectly effect on some aspects of life, but fast food are not really
dangerous like the drug, alcohol and tobacco impact on social. Another reason for my opposition to the stringent
management of fast food restaurants is that they play an vital role in national revenue. Fpr example, Starbuck contributes
billions dollars to the budget in terms of tax and profit and provide ample job opportunity . ⇒ Đoạn này đang bị lệch so với
ESSAY nhé (MỖI BODY CHỈ VIẾT MỘT MAIN IDEA, BỐ CỤC SONG SONG)
Body 1: Firstly,
Body 2: Secondly,
https://www.suabaiieltswriting.com/blog/ielts-writing-task-2-essay-fast-food
In conclution, I believe that it is more beneficial for the government to adjust the laws to manage the fast food
markets in the less strict ways than the drug, alcohol and tobacco industries.
BÀI 17
QUESTION: SHOULD GOVERNMENT REGULATE THE FAST FOOD INDUSTRY IN THE SAME WAY
bài mẫu 1
In this day and age, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on whether or not governments should strictly
control fast food industries like the way they do with drug, alcohol and tobacco industries. I myself believe that fast food
sector is not that negative to deserve these stringent regulations for these reasons below. ⇒ đúng rồi ạ
Firstly, eating fast food is absolutely convenient for those who fail to have time to cook. This is true when today people do
not have quality time with their family, let alone cooking food for themselves. In such case, those busy people just need to
come over fast food restaurants for their quick meals or online order. Take myself as an example, I usually go for my
favourite KFC restaurant when not having time to cook, which is both cost-effective and handy when food coming at my
Another reason why I do think that fast food industries should not be banned as the other harmful sectors is that junk foods
are not as dangerous to people’s health as drug, alcohol and tobacco. Too much fast food is likely to cause some diseases
such as obesity and heart related diseases; however, abuse of drug, alcohol can not only make people addicted but also
cause social evils such as crime, violence and addiction. For example, eating too much fast food can make teenagers
themselves obese, however, drug use or addiction might drive users to commit crimes such as raping or killing other people
for money. As a result, the government should keep drug, alcohol and tobacco industries under tight control rather than fast
For the reasons mentioned above, I believe that it is more beneficial for the government to manage the fast food industries
in a less strict way than the drug, alcohol and tobacco industries. ⇒ đúng rồi ạ, dạng opinion essay là chị chỉ cần conclusion
1 câu trả lời đúng trọng tâm nhắc lại ý kiến của mình là okay ạ
(306 words)
bài mẫu 2
● Bài này viết balanced có vẻ khó ds ad ui, ví dụ như mem muốn viết balanced í ad, ad plan hộ mem để mem
Stepping into the 21st century, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on the ongoing phenomenon that the
consumption of fast food is increasing, with many people maintaining that the most effective way to combat this good-for-
nothing trend is for the government to control the fast food industry in the way that they are doing towards such industries
as the drug, alcohol and tobacco INDUSTRIES ⇒ ghi là in a similar way that drugs, alcohol and tobacco are being
There are many reasons to support this strict method REGULATION, among which the root cause is health hazards led by
the over-eating OVER-CONSUMPTION of fast food. It is scientifically suggested that fast- food is among the main
culprits behind some life-threatenng diseases, ranging from obesity, cardiovascular diseases to even cancers. In the light of
THE detrimental effects caused by fast-food ⇒ ko gạch on human health, it is safe to say that this kind of food is by no
means less dangerous than drug, alcohol or tobacco. That is why a THE responsibility should rest with the government to
tighten their administration over fast-food in the same way as drug, alcohol and tobacco.>> you fail to explain any danger
caused by other categories like tobacco,... you must address them fully, not just focus on 1 but everything
Another justification for this stricter control from the authorities is that THE steps the government are currently taking to
counteract the excessive consumption of fast food seems SEEM to be unproductive. This can be illustrated by the fact that
although millions of dollars are poured into public health campaigns in an attempt to raise public awareness of THE
adverse influences of fast food; however, the truth is fast food intake has increasingly risen and shows no sign of reduction.
Another prime example is that albeit THE high taxes government has levied on THE fast-food industry, this industry has
still developed due to the fact that today consumers are willing to purchase fast-food for its convenience and affordability.
When other lenient methods take no effect, much more stringent approaches like clear illustration of health damage of fast
food on the packages or even a complete ban on this type of food ought to be adopted in order to prevent the public from
eating fast-food to excess. ⇒ the topic asks why government should control , here you argue that what government do has
All things considered, I once again reaffirm that only by implementing stricter methods to fast-food industry can we limit
Body 1: banning has some benefits 1/ human health improves + compare others ⇒ you only need 1 reason if you cannot
find 2
Body 2: banning has some drawbacks: 1/ these illegal items can be an item of trafficking 2/ it restricts their freedom
In this day and age, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on the opinion that the government should
control the fast food industries in a similar way that the drug, tobacco and alcohol ones are regulated. In my opinion,
administration should not strictly control fast food in the same way as the drug, alcohol and tobacco industries.
Firstly,fast food plays an important role in people's lives and brings a lot of benefits to society. To be more specific, eating
fast food is absolutely convenient, especially for people who do not have time to cook and prepare food. In fact, fast food is
made quickly, could be ordered online, and fast food restaurants are found almost everywhere. Therefore, many people can
easily choose their own favourite meal as well as save time for their work or study. For instance, I usually go for my
favourite restaurant to eat fried chicken, bubble tea and so on , which is both cost-effective and time-saving when food
Another reason why I do think that fast food industries should not be banned as the other harmful sectors is that junk foods
are not as dangerous to people’s health as drug, alcohol and tobacco. Too much fast food is likely to cause some diseases
such as obesity and heart related diseases; however, abuse of drug, alcohol can not only make people addicted but also
cause social evils such as crime, violence and addiction. For example, eating too much fast food can make teenagers
themselves obese, however, drug users who often fall into a state of paranoid agitation will not be able to control their
thinking behavior. Causing illegal racing, barbaric murder and so on. As a result, the government should keep drug, alcohol
and tobacco industries under tight control rather than fast food sector.
For the reasons mentioned above, I believe that it is more beneficial for the government to manage the fast food industries
in a less strict way than the drug, alcohol and tobacco industries.