Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Data

    Uploaded by

    julius anthony magallon
    11 views1 page
    This document compares the performance of different machine learning algorithms and data sampling techniques for imbalanced classification. Random forest and gradient boosting classifiers were tested on datasets using various wavelet families for feature extraction. The results show that SMOTE oversampling generally improved accuracy for the random forest classifier compared to the original imbalanced data, while ADASYN worked best for gradient boosting in many cases. Accuracy varied depending on the specific wavelet type and sampling method used.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    data (4)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares the performance of different machine learning algorithms and data sampling techniques for imbalanced classification. Random forest and gradient boosting classifiers were tested on datasets using various wavelet families for feature extraction. The results show that SMOTE oversampling generally improved accuracy for the random forest classifier compared to the original imbalanced data, while ADASYN worked best for gradient boosting in many cases. Accuracy varied depending on the specific wavelet type and sampling method used.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views1 page

    Data

    Uploaded by

    julius anthony magallon
    This document compares the performance of different machine learning algorithms and data sampling techniques for imbalanced classification. Random forest and gradient boosting classifiers were tested on datasets using various wavelet families for feature extraction. The results show that SMOTE oversampling generally improved accuracy for the random forest classifier compared to the original imbalanced data, while ADASYN worked best for gradient boosting in many cases. Accuracy varied depending on the specific wavelet type and sampling method used.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Sheet1

    Wavelet Without oversamplingOversampling techniqWith oversampling


    R.Forest G.Boost R.Forest G.Boos'{
    Daubechie 10% 5% SMOTE(regular): 80% 85%
    ADASYN: 85% 80%
    SMOTE-Tomek: 85% 85%
    SMOTE-ENN: 90% 80%
    Symlets 65% 70% SMOTE: 80% 85%
    ADASYN: 85% 75%
    SMOTE-T. 80% 80%
    SMO" : 75% 75%
    Coiflets 10% 65% SMOTE(regular min): 715% 85%
    ADASYN: 80% 80%
    SMOTE-Tomek: 80% 75%
    SMOTE-ENN: 75% 85%
    Biorthogon 65% 65% SMOTE(reg min/borde 80% 0%
    ADASYN: 80% 90%
    SMOTETomek: 80% 90%
    SMOTE-ENN: 85% 85%

    Page 1

    You might also like