Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Data

    Uploaded by

    julius anthony magallon
    16 views1 page
    This document compares the performance of different machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, 1D CNN) on an imbalanced classification task, with and without oversampling techniques. It shows that oversampling improves accuracy for all algorithms from around 75-90% without oversampling to 90-95% with oversampling. 1D CNN with SMOTE-Tomek oversampling achieves the best performance at 93% accuracy and 0.95 F1-score.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    data (3)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares the performance of different machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, 1D CNN) on an imbalanced classification task, with and without oversampling techniques. It shows that oversampling improves accuracy for all algorithms from around 75-90% without oversampling to 90-95% with oversampling. 1D CNN with SMOTE-Tomek oversampling achieves the best performance at 93% accuracy and 0.95 F1-score.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    16 views1 page

    Data

    Uploaded by

    julius anthony magallon
    This document compares the performance of different machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, 1D CNN) on an imbalanced classification task, with and without oversampling techniques. It shows that oversampling improves accuracy for all algorithms from around 75-90% without oversampling to 90-95% with oversampling. 1D CNN with SMOTE-Tomek oversampling achieves the best performance at 93% accuracy and 0.95 F1-score.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Sheet1

    Strategy OversampliParameter R.Forest G.Boost 1D CNN


    Without VoWithout OvAccuracy 10% 75% NULL
    Fl-score 0.67 0.73 -
    Wavelet DaubechiesDaubechies-
    With Over-Accuracy 90% 90% 90%
    Fl-score 0.90 0.90 0.90
    OversamplSMOTE-E ADASYN SMOTE-Tomek
    Wavelet DaubechieBiorthogon—
    With Votin Without OvAccuracy 78.4% 80.6% 88%
    Fl-score 0.73 0.79 0.90
    Wavelet Symlets Symlets -
    With Over-Accuracy 84.6% 83.7% 93%
    Fl-score 0.84 0.84 0.95
    OversamplSMOTE SMOTE-E SMOTE-Tomek
    Wavelet Symlets Symlets -

    Page 1

    You might also like