Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cofreros, Regil
Diaz, Julienne
Sindol, Seychelle
Gumayan, Patrick
Bayona, Ranel
Torrato, Arvin
REX – Robotic Exoskeleton
INTRODUCTION
REX is used by physiotherapists for people with mobility impairments, in rehabilitation centers in
the US, the UK, the Middle East, Australia and New Zealand.
Rex Bionics is working with rehabilitation specialists to develop the practice of Robot-Assisted
Physiotherapy. REX lifts patients from a sitting position into a robot-supported standing position,
allowing them to take part in a set of supported walking and stretching exercises, designed by
REX does not require the use of crutches, leaving the arms free for upper-body exercises and
activities of daily living; and allowing access for a wide range of patients.
Wheelchair users are at risk of developing numerous medical complications from extended
periods of sitting. By enabling them to spend more time standing, walking and exercising, REX
may offer significant health benefits. A programme of clinical trials is under way to evaluate
REX BIONICS LIMITED filed its patent on September 23, 2021 and was approved on January 6,
2022. It was invented by Richard Little and Robert Alexander Irving. REX is a walker for use by a
mobility impaired disabled user. The walker supports the user while moving them through a set
source in the form of a battery pack or other similar onboard power pack together with its
associated power supply cables, and a control system The exoskeleton includes a rigid pelvic
support member including a pelvic harness and a pair of leg structures Each of the leg structures
comprise an upper leg structural member, a lower leg structural member, a foot member, a
INDICATION
• SCI
• Stroke
• Balance problems
• Gait problems
• Multiple Sclerosis
CONTRAINDICATION
• Impaired skin integrity, including but not limited to wounds or skin lesions where the REX
• Musculoskeletal impairment which influences the fit of the REX or places the User at risk
of injury during full weight bearing or movement, i.e. severe contractures, recent
• spasticity score > 3 on the Modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities.
disease, orthostatic hypotension, peripheral vascular disease, or those that take blood
thinning medications.
• Impaired cognitive function which may impact the Users ability to operate the REX safely
• Impaired cognitive function which may result in the user becoming agitated and restless
of them during the use of REX resulting in the inability to give informed consent.
• A stoma bag or PEG feed in situ which could be negatively affected by REX’s support
ADVANTAGES
• Stand alone
• Widely accessible – people with severe disabilities are able to successfully use REX
• Workhorse – shares the physical demands of delivering therapy and reduce the strain on
therapist
DISADVANTAGES
• May pose risk to patients such as ankle swelling and fracture on distal tibia or calcaneus
during walking.
• Requires special adjustments for patients with SCI if there is leg length discrepancy, pelvis
• Not suited for SCI patients who are overweight or obese weighting more than 100
kilograms.
• Patients needs to attain 10-15 degrees hip extension, <10 knee extension in standing or
supine with ankle in neutral for patients to be able to use this product.
• Expensive
• REX is a hands-free, self-supporting device that allows for mobilization without the use of
crutches or a walking frame to maintain stability. It can be used by those with minimal
• The User is supported securely within the device using a pelvic harness, and thigh and
calf cuffs.
• REX is designed for use in a clinical environment, under the supervision of a REXtrained
Clinician. It is sophisticated, yet simple to use and operate. REX can be easily adjusted to
Once aligned properly and strapped in, the User is passively moved by REX into standing
• The User or Clinician controls REX with a 3-button keypad and joystick or T-bar. REX is
• The functionality of REX enables a User to perform the following mobility functions within
a controlled environment, on a flat, horizontal surface: Stand Sit Walk Turn Shuffle (Side-
• REX is adjusted by a REX-trained Clinician, working closely with the User, to ensure an
accurate alignment of the User’s limb dimensions to REX’s at the ankle, knee, and hip
support.
RESULT / DISCUSSIONS
Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury:
ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid investigates the
feasibility, safety and acceptability of using the REX self-stabilizing robotic exoskeleton in people
with spinal cord injury (SCI) who are obligatory wheelchair users. Feasibility is assessed by the
completion of transfer into the REX device, competency in achieving autonomous control and
completion of upper body exercise in an upright position in the REX device. Safety is measured
by the occurrence of serious adverse events. Device acceptability is assessed with a user
questionnaire.
study in people with SCI recruited from neurological rehabilitation centres in the United
Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. This is the planned interim report of the first 20
participants. Each completed a transfer into the REX, were trained to achieve machine control
and completed Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests as well as upper body exercises in standing in a
single first time session. The time to achieve each task as well as the amount of assistance
required was recorded. After finishing the trial tasks a User Experience questionnaire, exploring
All participants could transfer into the REX. The mean transfer time was 439 s. Nineteen
completed the exercise regime. Eighteen could achieve autonomous control of the REX, 17 of
whom needed either no assistance or the help of just one therapist. Eighteen participants
completed at least one TUG test in a mean time of 313 s, 15 with the assistance of just one
therapist. The questionnaire demonstrated high levels of acceptability amongst users. There
This first interim analysis of RAPPER II shows that it is feasible and safe for people with SCI to use
the REX powered assisted walking device to ambulate and exercise in. Participants with
tetraplegia and paraplegia could walk and perform a functional exercise program when standing
needing only modest levels of assistance in most cases. User acceptability was high.
SUMMARY
Physiotherapists use REX to help persons with movement issues, and Rex Bionics is partnering
rehabilitation clinics. REX raises patients from a seated posture to a robot-assisted standing
position, allowing them to participate in a series of supported walking and stretching activities
devised by physiotherapists to aid in the achievement of rehabilitation goals. REX eliminates the
need for crutches, freeing up the arms for upper-body workouts and daily activities, and giving
access to a wide spectrum of patients. REX eliminates the need for crutches, freeing up the arms
for upper-body workouts and daily activities, and giving access to a wide spectrum of patients.
REFERENCES
• https://www.rexbionics.com/
• https://patents.justia.com/inventor/richard-little
• www.rexbionics.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/TF-04-v4.0-REX-Clinical-Assessment-
Guide.pdf
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5477376/
• https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6153133/
OSSUR -POWER KNEE
INTRODUCTION
Active assistance powers flexion and extension to mimic concentric and eccentric muscle activity
Advanced sensors accurately detect the user’s movements and inform the microprocessor
where state-of-the-art algorithms enable the knee to respond to the user’s needs
A powerful motor provides consistent stance phase but also free swing phase
Delivering active extension when standing up, controlled resistance when descending, active
flexion and extension during walking and energy returning stance flexion, Power Knee facilitates
Ossur – Power Knee filed its patent on August 31,2015 and was approved on December 19,
2017. A prosthetic knee for active users has a locking head generally parallel to a vertical axis of
the prosthetic knee, a chassis, and a plurality of links connecting the locking head to the chassis.
The knee includes a swing control mechanism having a flexion stop connected to the chassis and
arranged to control the flexion angle of the knee. The flexion stop extends outwardly from the
chassis and obliquely relative to the vertical axis. The knee has an audible feedback mechanism
for providing the user with information about the location of the knee. The knee may also have a
block lock forming a manually activated mechanism allowing load bearing in a flexed position.
INDICATION
The device is to be used exclusively for the exo-prosthetic fitting of amputations of the lower
limb.
• Use of the device with bilateral transfemoral amputees and patients showing limited
residual limb control, such as unilateral hip-disarticulated amputees and lower extremity
CONTRAINDICATION
• None known
ADVANTAGES
• Active assistance in level-ground walking, step-over-step stair ascent and when standing
up
adjustment
DISADVANTAGES
• Cost, which is $70,000 to $90,000 US (or even more) for a complete solution.
• Noise: The Power Knee does make an unmistakable noise while moving;
• Length: at 37.5 centimeters, it is too long for people with longer residual limbs.
The device automatically adapts to activities such as walking, standing up, walking up stairs, and
more. It has several different states that the patient must learn to recognize and activate.
Standing
The device is in standing state by default and it will revert to standing state if it does not
The device will provide support when the patient applies weight to the prosthesis. The knee will
release/swing freely when the prosthesis is unloaded/no weight is applied to it. The patient can
The device adapts to the patients walking speed and style. It will give adaptive support in stance
Sitting Down
The device automatically detects sitting down motion. The device will provide support while the
patient sits down. The patient can use this to distribute weight equally to both legs and control
4. Within 3 seconds, lean slightly backwards and start flexing the knee. The knee will
5. The patient can now take the weight off the leg to release the knee and move the knee
After a few seconds of sitting without moving the knee, the knee will enter standby. Standby
The device will recognize when the patient starts to stand up. The device will provide a powered
3. Start to stand up. The patient will feel the knee assist standing up naturally.
NOTE: If the patient is unable to apply enough weight to the prosthesis to get the knee to assist
with standing up, the patient can increase weight by momentarily pressing on top of the knee by
hand.
Walking Up Stairs
The device will provide powered knee extension when it detects stair ascent.
Initial training:
2. Flex the hip to lift the prosthesis off the ground. The knee will swing freely.
3. If needed, swing the leg outwards to get the leg onto the first step to prevent the toe
5. Put weight on the prosthesis and extend the knee fully. The knee will detect the stairs
7. Take the weight off the prosthesis and if stair ascent has been triggered, the knee will
flex.
9. Practice going up and down the first step, repeating the above steps, until the patient is
2. Flex the hip to lift the prosthesis off the ground. The knee will swing freely.
3. If needed, swing the leg outwards to get the leg onto the first step to prevent the toe
5. Put weight on the prosthesis and extend the knee fully. The knee will detect the stairs
6. When the prosthetic knee has fully extended, place the other foot on the step above.
7. Flex the hip on the prosthetic side to bring the prosthesis to the next step. The prosthesis
will provide knee flexion to provide clearance and to prepare for the next step.
a. a. If prosthetic foot is leading, place the other foot next to it, and keep equal
The knee will give support while it flexes when walking downstairs and ramps.
2. Put weight on the prosthesis. Lean slightly backwards to flex the knee. The knee will flex
4. Continue to walk down the stairs or ramp. The knee will adapt the support to the walking
speed. Tell the patient to put half of the foot onto the lower step for constant support
Walking Up Ramps
Standing Lock
Standing lock lets the patient stand with the knee locked at up to 30° angles. The patient can
lean against objects or stand comfortably with the knee slightly bent. In standing lock, the knee
3. Put some weight on the prosthesis and hold it in position for a second.
4. Transfer full weight to the prosthesis. The knee will lock and give support.
1. Take weight off the prosthesis. The device will return to standing state.
Kneeling
The device automatically detects kneeling motion. The device will provide support until the knee
1. Take a step forward with the sound leg. If needed, use a hand support to maintain
balance.
4. Within 3 seconds, slightly flex the hip on the prosthetic side and hold pressure until the
Driving
Research entitled “Effects of extended power knee prosthesis stance time via visual feedback on
gait symmetry of individuals with unilateral amputation” shows a result that Increasing the
amputated-limb stance time via visual feedback significantly improved the stance time symmetry
(p=0.012) and peak propulsion symmetry (p=0.036) of individuals walking with both prostheses.
With the powered knee prosthesis, the highest feedback target elicited 36% improvement in
stance time symmetry, 22% increase in prosthesis-side peak propulsion, and 47% improvement
in peak propulsion symmetry compared to a no feedback condition. The changes with feedback
were not different with the passive prosthesis, and the main effects of device/ prosthesis type
were not statistically different. However, subject by device interactions were significant,
indicating individuals did not respond consistently with each device (e.g. prosthesis-side
propulsion remained comparable to or was greater with the powered versus passive prosthesis
for different subjects). Overall, prosthesisside peak propulsion averaged across conditions was
31% greater with the powered prosthesis and peak propulsion asymmetry improved by 48% with
SUMMARY
The Power Knee is the first motor-driven microprocessor knee in the world. Flexion and
extension are powered by active support to replicate concentric and eccentric muscle activity.
Advanced sensors precisely detect the user's movements and send them to the microprocessor,
which uses cutting-edge algorithms to enable the knee to respond to the user's needs. A
powerful motor allows for both consistent stance and free swing phases. Power Knee supports
symmetrical weight distribution and natural gait by providing active extension while standing up,
controlled resistance when descending, active flexion and extension while walking, and energy
REFERENCE
• https://media.ossur.com/image/upload/pi-documents-global/Power_Knee.pdf
• https://www.ossur.com/en-us/prosthetics/knees/power-
knee#specificationContentAnchor
• https://www.virginiaprosthetics.com/technology_bionics.html
• https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12984-019-0583-z.pdf
Title: LUKE ARM
Cofreros, Regil
Diaz, Julienne
Sindol, Seychelle
Gumayan, Patrick
Bayona, Ranel
Torrato, Arvin
Baltazar, Marese
ABSTRACT
The LUKE (Life Under Kinetic Evolution) arm is a modular prosthetic arm developed by DEKA
Research & Development Corp. (founded by Kamen) with funding from the Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and now manufactured by Mobius Bionics LLC. The LUKE arm
is configurable for levels of amputation ranging from shoulder to forearm. The hand has multiple,
Mobius Bionics has announced the commercial introduction of the LUKE arm, the first prosthetic
arm cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the new product category for integrated
prosthetic arms.
• A powered shoulder with the capability to reach overhead or behind the back
• A powered elbow with the strength to lift a bag of groceries from floor to tabletop
• A powered, multi-movement wrist with the precision, range of motion, and dexterity to hold
• A hand with four independent motors and a conforming grip to hold everything from
delicate items such as a phone or an egg to heavy items such as a gallon of milk without
• An innovative grip-force sensor that senses how firmly something is being grasped and
• A variety of ways to control the arm, including electromyographic (EMG) electrodes and
the home.
OTHER FEATURES
• Proportional Speed Control - allows for more fluid motion by letting the user control how
fast the joints move by adjusting how gently or aggressively they trigger the input signal.
• Compound Wrist - combines the movements of Wrist Flexion and Extension with Ulnar and
Radial Deviation which allows users to grasp objects above the head or below the waist
• Optional Internal Battering - Humeral and Shoulder Configurations are orderable with an
optional internal battery that can be used by itself or in conjunction with the external
• Conforming Grasp - The LUKE hand has a powered thumb, powered index finger and
combined powered middle, ring and pinky fingers that allow the hand to conform to
• Tactile Feedback - A tactor (vibratory motor) can be mounted to the user’s socket to
provide vibratory feedback. This can be activated by sensors in the thumb and/or by
• Virtual Reality Training - The software used by the prosthetist to set up the controls of each
arm has a simulated arm which allows users to test and practice their controls while making
The LUKE Arm was originally developed for DARPA by DEKA Research and Development
Corporation and approved for commercial use by the FDA in 2014. Mobius Bionics then took over
In June 2017, two Veterans with arm amputations became the first to receive new generation
LUKE arms. In February 2018, U.S. Air Force Veteran Ron Currier became the first person to be
ADVANTAGES
● Water Resistant
● Offers flexion and extension in the hand, rotation of the shoulder and rotation of the
elbow.
○ shoulder disarticulation
DISADVANTAGES
● Cannot be used by patients with lower limb amputation since it serves as the control
● Significantly more expensive than all prosthetic products available on the market.
● There is no knowledge about the long-term effects and the lengths of time it can be worn.
● Estimated short lifecycle and only a two-year warranty (it will need replacing every two
years)
● Extremely heavy (at the shoulder level it is fitted to a socket weighs over 10kg
METHODS
In addition to the many control input options, the LUKE arm may be controlled with Inertial
Measurement Units (IMUs) that are typically worn on the user’s shoes. They read the tilt of the
user’s foot and interpret each movement like a joystick to control the arm.
• Power Grip - used to grasp larger objects such as bottles, handles, etc.
• Tool Grip - can be used to grasp a tool handle and independently operate the index finger
to trigger the tool. It can also be used for many other applications such as typing.
• Fine Pinch Closed Grip - the tips of the thumb and index finger come together while the
middle, ring, and pinky fingers are closed. The fine pinch closed grip allows the user to
• Fine Pinch Open Grip - is similar to the fine pinch closed grip except the middle, ring, and
pinky fingers remain open and extended. The fine pinch open grip may be useful in
• Chuck Grip - thumb engages the index and middle fingers directly, creating a three finger
hold. It can be used to grasp round objects such as door knobs, bottles, cups, etc.
10 Powered Joints
The LUKE arm is the only commercially-available prosthesis with a powered shoulder, allowing a
shoulder-level amputee to reach over their head. In its shoulder configuration, the LUKE arm
• Humeral Rotation
At Discharge
1. Satisfaction with the LUKE Arm, as measured by the TAPES in patients accepting the
At 1 Month
At 1 Year
1. 75% of patients fit with the LUKE Arm will be using the prosthesis at 1 year
2. Satisfaction with the LUKE Arm, as measured by the TAPES will be rated “satisfied” or “very
SUMMARY
It is still early days for the product. There remain very few users worldwide (less than ten) and
consequently there is very little data to test the long term capability of the product at this
stage. The early research indicates that there are still significant technical areas of development
for the prosthesis as well as practical problems that make other products on the market more
attractive to the amputee. In addition, there is the geographical hurdles, as the LUKE arm is not
currently produced or approved outside the US, and most still need to be fitted there. Whilst
the prosthetics industry shows no signs of slowing down, it is likely that upper limb prostheses
will show the greatest technological development in the short term future. The LUKE arm
remains a work in progress but is undoubtedly a product that could benefit certain upper limb
amputees if development continues. For the time being, however, the significant price
differential for much smaller functional gain means that the LUKE arm is unlikely to be suitable
in most cases, particularly where there is a compensation shortfall due to a liability split.
REFERENCES
Https://www.mobiusbionics.com/luke-arm/
https://www.therobotreport.com/luke-prosthetic-arm-sense-touch-move-response-thoughts/