You are on page 1of 8

JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS

Volume 26, Number 1, 2010


© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
DOI: 10.1089/jop.2009.0035

Ocular Safety of Infliximab in Rabbit and Cell Culture Models

Fabrizio Giansanti,1 Laura Papucci,2 Sergio Capaccioli,2 Daniela Bacherini,1 Lorenzo Vannozzi,1
Ewa Witort,2 and Ugo Menchini1

Abstract
Purpose: To undertake the safety testing of infliximab in animal and cell culture models.
Methods: Sixteen New Zealand albino rabbits were divided into 4 groups of 4 animals. Each group received 2
mg of infliximab in the right eye and saline solution in the left eye. Clinical examination and retinal histology
were performed at months 1, 2, and 3 for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Electroretinography (ERG) recordings
were made before the injection, and at months 1 and 2 for group D. The assessment of the safety of infliximab in
retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) and retinal ganglion (RGC-5) cells was performed by Western blot analysis of
caspase-3 involved in apoptosis pathway, the analysis of cytotoxicity of infliximab by WST-1 proliferation assay,
and time-lapse video-microscopy to register the morphology of treated cells in time-lapse.
Results: Clinical examination of the eyes, histological study of the retina, and ERG recordings showed no sign
of ocular toxicity after a single intravitreal injection of 2 mg of infliximab in the rabbit model. RPE and RGC via-
bility was not reduced either in the range of concentration (up to 3 mg) or during the follow-up interval.
Conclusion: This study suggests that infliximab has no direct retinal toxicity using rabbit (2 mg) and cell culture
(2 and 3 mg) models.

Introduction
choroidal neovascularization in an animal model11 and ben-

T umor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a 17-kDa pep-


tide cytokine playing a key role in inflammation and
immunity.1 A number of confirmations from animal and
efits to patients affected with neovascular age-related macu-
lar degeneration12 after anti-TNF-α therapy.
A drug that specifically targets TNF-α may represent
human studies have indicated that TNF-α is a potentially an interesting therapeutic approach for patients with ocu-
important mediator in uveitis.2,3 lar inflammation.13 After the initial report of the favorable
TNF-α is mainly released by macrophages, T lymphocytes, effects of infliximab in the sight-threatening panuveitis of
and natural killer cells in response to different inflamma- patients with Behcet’s disease14 was released, many other
tory agents.1 During inflammation, TNF-α mediates leu- studies of its off-label use, in a series of patients with various
kocytic infiltration, dendritic cells maturation, macrophages forms of uveitis, reported beneficial results with anti-TNF
activation, and drives T-helper Type 1 cell responses within treatment.3
tissues in experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU).4 Infliximab (Remicade®, Roche, GB), is a human–mouse
Increasing evidence suggests that diabetic retinopa- chimaeric IgG1 antibody, administered systemically, that
thy has an underlying inflammatory element manifested inhibits the active soluble TNF-α implicated in the inflam-
by leukocyte involvement, adhesion to the retinal vessels, matory process. Serious side effects have also been described
and up-regulation of inflammatory genes.5,6 Even though when infliximab is administered systemically, including
diabetic macular edema is mainly the result of fluid store opportunistic intracellular infection, infusion reaction, neu-
due to capillary leakage, the etiology of diabetic macular tropenia, thrombocytopenia, and increased malignancy
edema is not wholly understood. An inflammatory ele- risk. The intravitreal administration of infliximab could
ment exists, and some studies have pointed out an altered decrease the systemic adverse side effects and improve the
local expression of TNF-α in this disease.6–10 The role of safety and efficacy of the drug in selected patients affected
TNF-α in retinal angiogenesis is under investigation at the with ocular inflammatory disease. Recently, Theodossiadis
moment. Previous studies demonstrated the regression of and colleagues15 reported their favorable preliminary

1
Department of Oto-Neuro-Ophthalmological Surgical Sciences, Eye Clinic, and 2Department of Experimental Pathology and
Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

65
66 GIANSANTI ET AL.

experience of intravitreal administration of 2 mg infliximab injection was performed ~2 mm posterior to the limbus
in patients affected with neovascular age-related macular with a 30-gauge needle attached to a tuberculin syringe. A
degeneration. few seconds later, 0.1 mL of aqueous humor was withdrawn
Retinal safety is of primary importance when using an from the anterior chamber via a paracentesis performed by a
intravitreal drug. The aim of our experimental study was to 12 o’clock limbal insertion of a 30-gauge needle connected to
confirm the retinal safety of intravitreal infliximab at 2 mg a 1-mL syringe. The rabbits were kept for 12 weeks in ambi-
in a rabbit model and to undertake safety testing of different ent light on a 12-h light/dark schedule.
doses of infliximab using a cell culture model (retinal gan- Clinical examination. Slit-lamp examination and indirect
glion (RGC-5) and retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell lines). ophthalmoscopy were used to evaluate changes in the cor-
nea, lens, vitreous, retina, and optic nerve. Such observations
were performed on all eyes immediately after the injections
Methods and at months 1, 2, and 3. Pupils were dilated prior to the
Experiment 1: Animal model ophthalmic examination. Experimental and control eyes
from all animals were graded for alterations using a quanti-
Animals. Sixteen New Zealand albino rabbits weighing tative clinical grading scale16 (see Table 1) at months 1, 2, and
between 1.8 and 2.3 kg were selected for this study. The rab- 3. In most cases, gradings were carried out by 2 examiners.
bits were divided into 4 groups of 4 animals. Groups A, B, C, Histological examination. Groups A, B, and C were eutha-
and D were used to evaluate ocular safety at different times nized with an overdose of pentobarbital 1, 2, and 3 months
after intravitreal infliximab injection. The animals were after injection, respectively. The eyes were immediately
treated according to the Association for Research in Vision enucleated, and the sclera incised 2 mm posterior to the
and Ophthalmology guidelines. Slit-lamp examination and limbus and fixed in a solution of 10% formalin. Eyes were
indirect ophthalmoscopy were performed on all eyes before sectioned, the tissues processed and embedded in paraffin,
the study. Animals showing corneal or lens opacity or reti- sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm, and stained with hematox-
nal damage before the study were excluded. ylin–eosin. Histological examination was carried out using
Rabbits were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine light microscopy and was performed by a blinded patholo-
hydrochloride (50 mg/kg) and xylazine hydrochloride gist. Thickness measurements of the retinal layer and retinal
(5 mg/kg). Benoxinate hydrochloride (0.4%) was applied ganglion cells counts were performed in the experimental
for topical anesthesia. Eyes were dilated with topical tropi- and control eyes. Signs of focal necrosis, vacuolization, and
camide (1%) applications. Fluoroquinolone antibiotic was inflammatory cell infiltration were also investigated.
used topically before and after all surgical procedures. Electroretinography. The eyes of group D were evaluated
Intravitreal injection. Infliximab (Remicade, Roche, GB) by electroretinography (ERG) before injection and 4 and 8
was reconstituted with sterile saline solution. A single inflix- weeks after injection. Pupils were dilated with tropicamide,
imab dose of 2 mg was tested on all groups, injected into the and the animals were dark-adapted for at least 2 h. Standard
right eye. Left eyes were treated with sterile saline solution. ERGs were recorded in both eyes using corneal electrodes
In all cases, the injection volume was 0.1 mL. Intravitreal (CSO Ophthalmic Instruments, Florence, Italy). Reference

Table 1. Quantitative Clinical Grading Scale

Tissue response Score 0 Score 1 Score 2 Score 3 Score 4

I. Cornea
a. Transparency opacity Clear Mild Moderate (iris Severe (bare Opaque (no iris
visible) iris detail) view)
b. Vessels None <1 mm 1–3 mm from 3–4 mm from Central
limbus limbus involvement
c. Abscess None <1 mm 1–2 mm 3–4 mm >5 mm
II. Anterior chamber
a. Protein flare None Trace Mild Moderate Severe
b. Inflammatory cells None Trace Mild Moderate Severe
c. Fibrin None Mild strand Moderate Severe strands No iris details
strands <15% >15%
d. Hemorrhage None Mild Moderate >50% 8-ball
III. Iris
a. Blood vessels None Mild Moderate Severe Neovascular
IV. Vitreous
a. Protein flare None Trace Mild Moderate Severe
b. Opacities None Cells Multiple clumps Red reflex Opaque
V. Retinal detachment None 25% 50% 75% Total
VI. Optical media Clear View of vessels Sharp red reflex Dull red reflex Totally opaque
outlines only

Source: From Meredith TA et al. (1990).16


OCULAR SAFETY OF INFLIXIMAB 67

and ground electrodes were made of stainless steel surgical JX microplate reader. Percentage of cell viability was calcu-
needles and were inserted into the ears. ERG signals were lated based on the absorbance measured relative to that of
recorded using Retimax (CSO Ophthalmic Instruments, the untreated control cells maintained in culture medium
Florence, Italy). Dark-adapted scotopic responses and sco- alone.
topic flash responses were recorded simultaneously in both Time-lapse video-microscopy. Each cell line was treated
eyes. Flashes varied in intensity from −2.50 to +0.5 log with or without infliximab (2 and 3 mg) and the apoptotic
scot cd s/m2. At each scheduled examination, ERGs were events were registered for 72 h and counted by time-lapse
repeated 3 times for each rabbit. The amplitudes of a- and video-microscopy using a Zeiss-inverted phase-contrast
b-waves were calculated for each recording. microscope equipped with a 10× objective, Panasonic CCD
cameras and JVC BR9030 time-lapse video recorders, as
Experiment 2: Cell culture model previously reported.21 An apoptotic event was registered at
the moment the cell shrank completely and split into apop-
RPE cell line. Cells of the human RPE line ARPE-19 were totic bodies.
obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC;
Manassas, VA). ARPE-19 is an immortalized cell line that is
spontaneously produced by the culture of human RPE.17 The Results
cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37°C in 5% Experiment 1
CO2 in 10% fetal bovine serum-defined minimal essential
(FBS-DMEM)-F12 medium supplemented with 100 U/mL Clinical observation. One rabbit from group A showed
penicillin G and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. trace of protein flare in the anterior chamber of both eyes.
RGC-5 cell line. Retinal ganglion cell (RGC)-5 cell line,18–20 The average score of group A at month 1 was 0.25 in the
developed by transformation of RGCs post-natal Sprague- experimental eyes and 0.25 in the control eyes.
Dawley rats, was grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s One rabbit from group B showed trace of protein flare
medium (DMEM; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with in both eyes at month 1. The average score of Group B was:
10% heat-inactivated FBS (Gibco) and 100 U/mL of penicil- 0.25 at month 1 in the experimental eye and 0.25 in the con-
lin and 100 μg/mL of streptomycin (Gibco). Cells were pas- trol eye; 0 at months 2 and 3 in the experimental and control
saged every 2–3 days, and the cultures incubated at 37°C in eyes.
5% CO2. For all experiments cells were used at an 80% of cell A rabbit from group D showed trace of protein flare in
confluence. the vitreous humor of the experimental eye at month 1. The
Western blot analysis. The assays were performed accord- average score of group D was: 0.25 at month 1 in the exper-
ing to standard conditions. In short, following treatments imental eye and 0 in the control eye; 0 at months 2 and 3 in
with infliximab (2 and 3 mg), cells were washed twice in both eyes.
ice-cold PBS, re-suspended in 100 μL of ice-cold RIPA lysis Three rabbits showed subconjunctival hemorrhage
buffer, vortexed for 3 s, and incubated on ice for 30 min. The observed immediately after the injection.
protein lysates were obtained by centrifugation at high speed In summary, there was no clinical evidence of ocular
for 20 min at 4°C to separate nonsoluble cell debris. Proteins damage in rabbits from any of the groups.
(20 μg/lane) were separated by NuPAGE® 12% Bis–Tris Gel, Histological findings. Retinal histology was examined by
electroblotted (Trans-Blot® Semi-Dry apparatus; Bio-Rad, light microscopy. There were no differences in histological
Hercules, CA) onto Protran® nitrocellulose transfer mem-
brane (Schleicher & Schuell, Germany). The blots were probed
with the mouse monoclonal anti-caspase-3 antibody (Santa Experimental Eye Control Eye
Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) for RPE cell line or
with the rabbit polyclonal anti-caspase-3 (Upstate-Millipore,
Billerica, MA) for RGC-5 cell line. The mouse monoclonal
anti-α-tubulin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was
used as protein loading control. Following treatment with
the secondary antibody, goat anti-mouse or mouse anti-rab-
bit IRDye® 700CW (Li-Cor Bioscience, Lincoln, NE), respec- Month 1
tively, according to the instruction manual, protein bands
were analyzed by Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li-Cor)
using the software for protein quantification.
Cell viability assay: WST-1. The viability of ARPE-19 and
RGC-5 cells was determined by a cell proliferation assay
using WST-1 reagent (Roche, Milano, Italy). WST-1 is a water-
soluble sulfonated tetrazolium salt that is cleaved by cellu-
lar succinate hydrogenases in living cells, yielding dark blue Month 3
formazan. Damaged or dead cells exhibit reduced or no
dehydrogenase activity. In brief, RPE and RGC-5 cells were FIG. 1. Light microscopy examination of the retina per-
plated onto a 96-multiwell plate in quadruple and treated or formed after intravitreal injection of 2 mg of infliximab and
not with infliximab (2 and 3 mg) for 24, 48, or 72 h. WST-1 sterile saline solution into the experimental eye and into the
solution/culture medium (5 mmol/L, 1:9) was added to control eye after 1 and 3 months, respectively. No differ-
each well. Following 2-h incubation at 37°C, absorbance at ence between experimental and control eyes was detected.
450 nm (reference at 630 nm) was measured by a Multiskan Magnification, 400×; bar, 50 μm.
68 GIANSANTI ET AL.

appearance between the eyes injected with infliximab and CI: −10.84 to 3.25, P = 0.29), or month 3 (difference: −2.77
those injected with sterile saline solution in groups A, B, μm, 95% CI: −12.74 to 7.19, P = 0.58).
and C (Fig. 1). No signs of focal necrosis, vacuolization, or The mean retinal thickness was 152.4 μm (95% CI:
inflammatory cell infiltration were detected in the experi- 138.4–166.4) in the experimental eyes and 152.4 μm (95% CI:
mental and control eye. 136.9–164.9) in the control eyes at month 1; 131.2 μm (95%
The statistical significance of baseline differences CI: 119–143.3) in the experimental eyes and 135 μm (95% CI:
between experimental and control eye (retinal ganglion cell 122.8–147.1) in the control eyes at month 2; 124.6 μm (95% CI:
number and differences in retinal thickness) as well as of 107.4–141.8) in the experimental eyes and 127.4 μm (95% CI:
change from baseline to months 1 and 2 was computed tak- 110.2–144.5) in the control eyes at month 3.
ing into account within-subject correlation in a linear-mixed Electroretinography. ERG changes were considered sig-
model with rabbit as a random effect. Stata 11.0 software was nificant if the follow-up differences in amplitude (a- and
used for calculations (StataCorp, College Station, TX). b-waves) were lower than 30% compared to pre-injection
The retinal ganglion cell (RGC) number did not differ values.22 Figure 2 displays the percentage of variation of a-
between control and experimental eye at month 1 (difference and b-amplitude differences in all experimental eyes (group
−0.45, 95% CI: −2.35 to 1.44, P = 0.69), month 2 (difference in D) with respect to preinjection. In all cases, signal varia-
RGC number −0.38, 95% CI: −2.13 to 1.36, P = 0.66) or month tions were not higher than 30%. The statistical significance
3 (difference 0.43, 95% CI: −1.95 to 2.81, P = 0.72). of baseline differences between experimental and control
The retinal thickness did not differ between control and eyes (a- and b-amplitude difference) as well as of change
experimental eye at month 1 (difference: 1.49 μm, 95% CI: from baseline to months 1 and 2 was computed taking into
−6.64 to 9.64; P = 0.71), month 2 (difference: −3.79 μm, 95% account within-subject correlation in a linear-mixed model
with rabbit as a random effect. The baseline differences

A ERG Results With 0.5 log Stimulus


30 A ERG 0.5 log Stimulus
180
Difference in (a and b) Amplitude
20
Amplitude Difference (%)

170
10
160
(microV)

0
150

–10
140

–20
130 Experimental Eye
R1 R2 R3 R4
–30 Control Eye
120
–2 0 2 4 6 8 0 4 8
Time (Weeks) Weeks

B ERG Results With –2.5 log Stimulus B ERG –2.5 log Stimulus
30 150
Difference in (a and b) Amplitude

20 140
Amplitude Difference (%)

10
(microV)

130

0
120
–10
110 Experimental Eye
–20 Control Eye
R1 R2 R3 R4
–30 0 4 8
–2 0 2 4 6 8 Weeks
Time (Weeks)
FIG. 3. Electroretinography (ERG) amplitude variation
FIG. 2. Electroretinography (ERG) amplitude variation in between experimental and control eyes from all rabbits
the experimental eyes with respect to pretreatment with a stimulated with (A) +0.5 log units of cd s/m2 and (B) −2.5
stimulus of +0.5 log units of cd s/m2 (A) and −2.5 log units of log units of cd s/m2. The y-axis reports a- and b-amplitude
cd s/m2 (B). Individual rabbit ERG amplitudes are plotted. The difference (μV) at each measurement time. The first point
y-axis reports the percentage difference of a- and b-amplitude (before zero) is the pretreatment measure. Dots and squares
of posttreatment recordings with respect to pretreatment. The indicate mean values; error bars represent standard error
first point (before zero) is the pretreatment measure. from the mean.
OCULAR SAFETY OF INFLIXIMAB 69

between experimental and control eyes (a- and b-amplitude of the infliximab administered to both cell lines at the dose
difference) were not statistically significant (P = 0.924). The of 3 mg/mL tested.
changes from baseline between experimental and control The possibility that infliximab could lead to enhance-
eyes to months 1 and 2 were nonstatistically significant ment of the apoptotic events has been further evaluated by
(P = 0.735 and 0.889, respectively). Figure 3 displays the a- time-lapse video-microscopy employing microscopic video
and b-amplitude difference in all experimental eyes with registration. The number of apoptotic events occurring in
respect to control eyes at each time point. ARPE-19 and RGC-5 cells cultured in a medium supple-
mented with infliximab (2 and 3 mg) have been quantified
Experiment 2 during 24, 48, and 72 h of microscopic video registration
(Fig. 6). An apoptotic event was considered positive at the
Cellular apoptotic death of ARPE-19 and RGC-5 cells, moment the cell detached from the substrate, shrank, and
involving the intrinsic death pathway initiated at the level blebbed. The ARPE-19 and RGC-5 cells cultured in normal
of the mitochondrion, was detected through activity of the growth medium served as untreated control. The number
effector caspase-3. Caspase-3 has been reported to activate of apoptotic events registered did not differ between cells
death effector molecules resulting in the fragmentation of treated with infliximab and nontreated controls, and never
genomic DNA in association with structural and morpho- exceeded the physiological number of apoptotic cells even
logical changes characteristic of apoptosis. The enzymatic after 72 h of treatment.
activity of caspase-3 is usually detected as a reduction in the
amount of pro-enzyme and/or appearance of smaller pep- Discussion
tides, products of pro-caspase cleavage. In protein lysates of
both ARPE-19 and RGC-5 cell lines treated with infliximab TNF-α is implicated in the pathogenesis of a variety of
(2 and 3 mg) analyzed by WB analysis with anti-caspase-3 inflammatory processes and, recently, anti-TNF therapy has
specific antibody, the levels of pro-caspase-3 observed as a also been able to arrest experimental choroidal neovascu-
protein band of 32 kDa remained stable and comparable to larization and reduce macular edema.10,11 In ophthalmology,
untreated control cell lines (Fig. 4). This shows that inflix- the clinical usefulness of anti-TNF therapy is under investi-
imab, even at a relatively high dose, did not induce apoptotic gation. If its efficacy is confirmed, it could be advantageous
death program in both tested cell lines. in blocking only the intraocular TNF-α so as to minimize
The cell proliferation reagent WST-1 (Roche) was used to the adverse systemic events. Recently, Theodossiadis et al.15
analyze possible cytotoxic activity of 2 or 3 mg/mL of inf- reported their preliminary results of intravitreal administra-
liximab in RPE and RGC-5 cell lines by the spectrophoto- tion of infliximab into 3 patients affected with neovascular
metric quantification of cell proliferation, using the 96-well age-related macular degeneration. Two intravitreal injec-
format as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. At least tions of 2 mg of infliximab were performed on each patient.
3 experiments were performed and each sample’s absor- The patients were followed up for 7 months and neither local
bance at 450 nM was analyzed in quadruple by Multiskan JX nor systemic adverse events were noted.
microplate reader. The results presented in Figure 5 demon- Safety of intraocular infliximab up to 1.7 mg was previ-
strate the absence of any statistically significant cytotoxicity ously investigated in a pilot study23 in a rabbit model by our

A RPE RGC-5

0 24 48 72 0 24 48 72 hours

α-tubulin FIG. 4. Analysis of caspase-3 pro-


tein expression. (A) Western blot anal-
ysis. Protein extracts were separated
by 12% SDS-PAGE, blotted onto a
Caspase-3 nitrocellulose membrane, and probed
with mouse monoclonal anti-cas-
Infliximab 3 mg/mL pase-3 antibody for retinal pigment
epithelial (RPE) cells and with rab-
B RPE RGC-5 bit polyclonal anti-caspase-3 for reti-
nal ganglion (RGC-5) cells. A mouse
0.25
monoclonal anti-α-tubulin antibody
Caspase 3/Tubulin (ratio)

0.20 was used as protein loading control.


(B) Densitometric analysis of cas-
0.15 pase-3 activity. Bands were analyzed
by Odyssey Infrared Imaging System
0.10 (Li-Cor) using the software for pro-
tein quantification.
0.05

0.00
0 24 48 72 0 24 48 72 hours
70 GIANSANTI ET AL.

A WST-1 % of Living Cells B WST-1 Absorbance


RPE RGC-5
100 0.25

80 0.20
% of Living Cells

Absorbance (450 nm)


60 0.15

40 0.10
RPE Untreated
0.05 RPE +Infliximab 3 mg/mL
20
RGC-5 Untreated
RGC-5 +Infliximab 3 mg/mL
0 0.00
24 48 72 24 48 72 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60
Untreated Infliximab 3 mg/mL Hours

FIG. 5. Effect of treatment of 3 mg/mL of infliximab on cell proliferation of retinal ganglion (RGC-5) and ARPE-19 cell
lines. The cell proliferation reagent WST-1 was used to analyze cytotoxic activity of infliximab. Data were expressed as
means ± SD from 4 experiments. P > 0.05 vs. non-treated cells. Percentage of living cell (A) and absorbance (B).

group. In that study, 3 groups of 3 rabbits received a dose of Two-milligram dose was selected because it was used in
1, 1.7, and 3.3 mg, respectively. We detected signs of retinal humans.15 Our results indicate that 2 mg infliximab admin-
toxicity only in the histological samples at a dose of 3.3 mg. istered intravitreally in rabbit eyes did not display ocular
In addition, Theodossiadis and colleagues24 demonstrated toxicity when examined by histology or slit-lamp biomicros-
the safety of a single intravitreal injection of infliximab up copy, indirect fundoscopy, and ERG during the follow-up.
to a dose of 2 mg, in 2 groups of 4 rabbits treated, respec- To our knowledge an analysis of the safety of infliximab
tively, with 1 and 2 mg of infliximab and followed up for 45 in RPE and RGC cells has never been reported. In our study
days. Doses of 5 mg or higher revealed morphological and (experiment 2), we reported the effects of the infliximab
functional changes of the retina. exposure on 2 cell lines, ARPE-19 and RGC-5, with differ-
In the present study (experiment 1), we have aimed to ent doses (2 and 3 mg), and demonstrated the absence of
confirm the safety profile of 2 mg of intravitreal infliximab any type of cytotoxic activity of infliximab in our cellular
by studying 4 groups (A, B, C, and D) of 4 rabbits followed model. To demonstrate this we used Western blot analysis
up for 3 (groups A, B, and C) and 2 (group D) months. of caspase-3 involved in apoptotic death pathway,25 analysis
of cytotoxicity of infliximab by WST-1 proliferation assay,
and time-lapse video-microscopy to register morphology of
Infiximab 3 mg/mL treated cells in time-lapse.
25
In our study we could not detect any proteolytic activity
RGC-5 + Infliximab of caspase-3, the well-known effector of the apoptotic pro-
20 RGC-5 Untreated gram. The cleaved subunits were not detected by western
Cumulative Apoptotic Cells

RPE + Infliximab blot analysis with the antibodies used. These observations
RPE Untreated suggest that our antibodies were incapable of detecting
15
these cleaved fragments; this could be due to an insufficient
amount of cleaved material present at the time point in which
10 the cells were harvested for preparation of protein lysates,
or the cells might clear these fragments rapidly, as has been
observed in other studies,26 or most probably, there was no
5 detectable proteolytic activity as a result of the absence of
an activated apoptotic program. Since we observed a close
correlation between the time-lapse results that showed no
0
significant number of apoptotic cells in both cell lines, this
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 confirms the failure of infliximab to induce apoptotic death.
Hours Infliximab was also proved safe in our cellular model since
we could not detect any significant cytotoxicity or inhibition
FIG. 6. Time-lapse video-microscopic analysis of inflix- of cell proliferation between treated and nontreated controls
imab administration on cell viability. The apoptotic events with WST-1 assay.
were registered for 72 h and counted by 3 independent oper- In conclusion, our experimental findings confirm
ators both in infliximab-treated and non-treated controls. the safety of intravitreal infliximab when used at 2 mg.
Data were expressed as means ± SD from at least 3 experi- Furthermore, infliximab showed no nondesired or unex-
ments. P > 0.05 vs. non-treated cells. pected effects on cellular physiology in our cellular model of
OCULAR SAFETY OF INFLIXIMAB 71

RGC-5 and ARPE-19 lines up to a dose of 3 mg. These results, following infliximab therapy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 139:537–540,
with those from earlier studies, provide the safety dosage 2005.
(up to 2 mg) for the use of intravitreal infliximab in future 13. Nussenblatt, R. Treating intraocular inflammatory disease in
clinical studies. the 21st century. Arch. Ophthalmol. 123:1000–1001, 2005.
14. Sfikakis, P.P., Theodossiadis, P.G., Katsiari, C.G., et al. Effect of
infliximab on sight-threatening panuveitis in Behçet’s disease.
Acknowledgments Lancet. 358:295–296, 2001.
15. Theodossiadis, P.G., Liarakos, V.S., Sfikakis, P.P., et al. Intravitreal
The authors thank Dr. N. Agarwal who kindly gifted administration of the anti-tumor necrosis factor agent inflix-
RGC-5 cell line and Prof. G. Virgili for assistance with sta- imab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Am. J.
tistics. Supported by a grant from the Cassa di Risparmio di Ophthalmol. 147:825–30, 830.e1, 2009.
Firenze Foundation, Florence, Italy. 16. Meredith, T.A., Trabelsi, A., Miller, M.J., et al. Spontaneous
sterilization in experimental Staphylococcus epidermidis
Author Disclosure Statement endophthalmitis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 31:181–186, 1990.
17. Dunn, K.C., Aotaki-Keen, A.E., Putkey, F.R., et al. ARPE-19, a
No competing financial interests exist. human retinal pigment epithelial cell line with differentiated
properties. Exp. Eye Res. 62:155–169, 1996.
18. Krishnamoorthy, R.R., Agarwal, P., Prasanna, G., et al.
References
Characterization of a transformed rat retinal ganglion cell line.
1. Bazzoni, F., and Beutler, B. The tumor necrosis factor ligand and Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 86:1–12, 2001.
receptor families. N. Engl. J. Med. 334:1717–1725, 1996. 19. Maher, P., and Hanneken, A. The molecular basis of oxidative
2. Ooi, K.G., Galatowicz, G., Calder, V.L., et al. Cytokines and stress-induced cell death in an immortalized retinal ganglion
chemokines in uveitis: is there a correlation with clinical phe- cell line. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46:749–757, 2005.
notype? Clin. Med. Res. 4:294–309, 2006. 20. Agar, A., Li, S., Agarwal, N., et al. Retinal ganglion cell line apop-
3. Theodossiadis, P.G., Markomichelakis, N.N., and Sfikakis, P.P. tosis induced by hydrostatic pressure. Brain Res. 1086:191–200,
Tumor necrosis factor antagonists: preliminary evidence for an 2006.
emerging approach in the treatment of ocular inflammation. 21. Luzi, E., Papucci, L., Schiavone, N., et al. Downregulation of
Retina. 27:399–413, 2007. bcl-2 expression in lymphoma cells by bcl-2 ARE-targeted mod-
4. Dick, A.D., Forrester, J.V., Liversidge, J., et al. The role of tumour ified, synthetic ribozyme. Cancer Gene Ther. 10:201–208, 2003.
necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) in experimental autoimmune uveo- 22. Manzano, R.P., Peyman, G.A., Khan, P., et al. Testing intravitreal
retinitis (EAU). Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 23:617–637, 2004. toxicity of bevacizumab (Avastin). Retina. 26:257–261, 2006.
5. Joussen, A.M., Murata, T., Tsujikawa, A., et al. Leukocyte- 23. Giansanti, F., Ramazzotti, M., Vannozzi, L., et al. A pilot study
mediated endothelial cell injury and death in the diabetic ret- on ocular safety of intravitreal infliximab in a rabbit model.
ina. Am. J. Pathol. 158:147–152, 2001. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49:1151–1156, 2008.
6. Joussen, A.M., Poulaki, V., Le, M.L., et al. A central role for 24. Theodossiadis, P.G., Liarakos, V.S., Sfikakis, P.P., et al. Intravitreal
inflammation in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. administration of the anti-TNF monoclonal antibody infliximab
FASEB J. 18:1450–1452, 2004. in the rabbit. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 247:273–281,
7. Limb, G.A., Webster, L., Soomro, H., et al. Platelet expression of 2009.
tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), TNF receptors and 25. Tempestini, A., Schiavone, N., Papucci, L., et al. The mecha-
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in patients with pro- nisms of apoptosis in biology and medicine: a new focus for
liferative diabetic retinopathy. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 118:213–218, ophthalmology. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 13(Suppl 3):S11–S18, 2003.
1999. 26. Zhang, Y., and Bhavnani, B.R. Glutamate-induced apoptosis in
8. Limb, G.A., Hollifield, R.D., Webster, L., et al. Soluble TNF recep- primary cortical neurons is inhibited by equine estrogens via
tors in vitreoretinal proliferative disease. Invest. Ophthalmol. down-regulation of caspase-3 and prevention of mitochondrial
Vis. Sci. 42:1586–1591, 2001. cytochrome C release. BMC Neurosci. 6:13, 2005.
9. Doganay, S., Evereklioglu, C., Er, H., et al. Comparison of serum
Received: April 8, 2009
NO, TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, sIL-2R, IL-6 and IL-8 levels with
grades of retinopathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eye. Accepted: October 12, 2009
16:163–170, 2002.
Address correspondence to:
10. Sfikakis, P.P., Markomichelakis, N., Theodossiadis, G.P., et al.
Dr. Fabrizio Giansanti
Regression of sight-threatening macular edema in type 2 dia-
betes following treatment with the anti-tumor necrosis factor Department of Oto-Neuro-Ophthalmological Surgical Sciences
monoclonal antibody infliximab. Diabetes Care. 28:445–447, Eye Clinic
2005. University of Florence
11. Shi, X., Semkova, I., Müther, P.S., et al. Inhibition of TNF-alpha Viale Morgagni 85
reduces laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. Exp. Eye Florence 50134
Res. 83:1325–1334, 2006. Italy
12. Markomichelakis, N.N., Theodossiadis, P.G., and Sfikakis, P.P.
Regression of neovascular age-related macular degeneration E-mail: fabrizio.giansanti@unifi.it

You might also like