International Journal of Technology

List of Changes
Manuscript: #R1-CE-6294
Preparation and Performance Evaluation of TiO2 incorporated Fly Ash-Kaolin Ceramic
Membrane for Oil/Water Separation

Response and Revision made by Author(s)

Reviewer #1:
No Comments
Abstract and Throughout the manuscript:
1
Please correct “… the permeate water flux
up to 116 L.m-2.h-1” to be “… the
permeate water flux up to 116 L/m2/h1”
2 Please correct “… water resources will be
no longer adequate …” to be “… water
resources to be no longer adequate …”
3 Please correct “In Indonesia as …” to be
“Indonesia as …”
Please correct “… composite sponge
4
(Kusrini et al., 2022 and Addina et al.,
2022) etc” to be “… composite sponge
(Kusrini et al., 2022; Addina et al., 2022)”
5 Please correct “… settling, gravitational …”
to be “… settling gravitational …”
Please correct “… separation efficiency” to
6
be “… separation efficiencies”
Please correct “… (Diana S, 2018)” to be
7
“… (Diana et al., 2018)”
Please correct “…, easily forming
8
suspensions to coat …“ to be “…, but
easily form suspensions to coat …“
Please correct “… to be operated at higher
9
temperatures, at more extreme chemical
condition, and at higher mechanical
Revision/Changes
Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
(Page 1 paragraph 1)
Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
(Page 1 paragraph 1)
Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
(Page 2 paragraph 2)
Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
(Page 2 paragraph 2)
Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
Page 2 paragraph 2)
Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
Page 2 paragraph 2)
Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
(Page 2 paragraph 3)
Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
(Page 2 paragraph 3)
International Journal of Technology

conditions easily forming suspensions to

coat …“ to be “… to be operated at higher
temperatures, more extreme chemical
condition, and higher mechanical
conditions to coat …“
Please correct “… limited causing the Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
10
ceramic membranes are more expensive.” has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
to be “… limited causing the ceramic (Page 2 paragraph 3)
membranes more expensive.“
Please correct “The commercial Al2O3 …” Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
11
to be “The price of commercial Al2O3 …” has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
(Page 2 paragraph 3)
Please correct “The cost of waste-based or Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
12
natural mineral-based ceramic membranes has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
is tremendously decreased, which material (Page 2 paragraph 3)
prices ranging from …” to be “The price of
waste-based or natural mineral-based
ceramic membranes is tremendously
decreased, ranging from …”
Please correct “… considerable interest Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
13
because its unique properties …” to be “… has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
considerable interest because of its unique (Page 3 paragraph 4)
properties …”
Please correct “… extensively deteriorate Agreed, the sentence in the revised manuscript
14
the membrane performance.” to be “… has been revised as reviewer’s suggestion.
extensively deteriorates the membrane (Page 3 paragraph 5)
performance.”

Reviewer #2:
Reviewer #2 has accepted the revision