"Advancing Sustainable Development in the Education Industry:

Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations"

1
 Content

Introduction......................................................................................................................................3

Background overview......................................................................................................................4

Impact..............................................................................................................................................5

The challenges and issues................................................................................................................6

The opportunity................................................................................................................................7

Recommendations and Conclusion..................................................................................................8

References......................................................................................................................................10

Appendices.....................................................................................................................................13

2
Introduction:

The education industry is an essential sector that plays a significant role in shaping the
future of society. As sustainability increasingly becomes a global priority, educational
institutions are uniquely positioned to contribute to sustainable development.
Sustainable development refers to the economic, social, and environmental
development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their needs (Lozano et al., 2013). By adopting sustainable
business practices, educational institutions can reduce their ecological footprint,
support the well-being of their students and staff, and contribute to sustainable
development. This report aims to analyze how educational institutions can respond to
the challenges and opportunities of sustainable development by adopting sustainable
business practices. The report will demonstrate knowledge of sustainability and
critically apply this knowledge to the education industry sector. It will explore how
educational institutions can adopt sustainable practices to strengthen their
competitiveness.

Background Overview of the Education Industry:

The education industry is an essential sector that has a significant impact on the
development of society. According to UNESCO, the education industry comprises
institutions that provide learning opportunities, including primary, secondary, and
tertiary education, vocational training, and adult education. The education industry is
rapidly growing, with the global education market expected to reach $10 trillion by
2030 (Holmes, 2021). (Refer to appendix 1)
Despite its importance, the education industry faces several challenges, including
financial constraints, declining enrollment rates, and technological disruptions. For
example, a study by El Zoghbi and colleagues (2018) found that financial constraints
and declining enrollment rates are significant challenges faced by higher education
institutions in the United States. The authors also noted that sustainable practices can
contribute to cost savings and improve the financial stability of educational
institutions.

3
Additionally, educational institutions face sustainability challenges such as high
energy consumption, waste generation, and greenhouse gas emissions, which impact
the environment and contribute to climate change. Regarding sustainability
challenges, a report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
highlighted the impact of the education sector on the environment, including high
energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. The report also noted that
educational institutions have a responsibility to reduce their environmental impact and
promote sustainability (UNEP, 2016). As such, educational institutions must adopt
sustainable practices to mitigate the negative impacts of their operations on the
environment and contribute to sustainable development. Sustainable practices in the
education industry can help reduce energy consumption, minimize waste generation,
and promote sustainable transportation. Additionally, sustainable practices can
enhance the learning environment and promote the well-being of students and staff,
leading to improved academic performance and increased competitiveness. For
example, a study by Rojas-Contreras and colleagues (2018) found that the use of
natural light and ventilation in schools can improve the cognitive performance of
students (Refer to appendix 2). Similarly, a study by Kats and colleagues (2016)
found that sustainable design features in schools, such as improved indoor air quality
and thermal comfort, can enhance academic performance and student health.

Impact: 

The TBL framework has gained popularity in the education industry as a tool to help
organizations balance economic, social, and environmental sustainability. Research
by Freeman and colleagues (2010) found that the TBL framework can be a useful
approach to help organizations evaluate their sustainability efforts and make strategic
decisions.
The TBL framework has been used by several educational institutions to develop
sustainability strategies. For example, the University of Bristol in the UK has adopted
the TBL framework as a tool to guide its sustainability efforts (Bennett and James,
2019). The university has established a Sustainability Steering Group, which oversees
the development and implementation of sustainability strategies across the institution.
The TBL framework has also been used by educational institutions to evaluate their
sustainability performance. A study by Anderson and colleagues (2018) used the TBL

4
framework to assess the sustainability performance of universities in the UK. The
study found that the TBL framework can be a useful tool to evaluate sustainability
performance and identify areas for improvement.
In addition to the TBL framework, other academic models and theories have been
used to analyze the impact of sustainability on organizational strategy in the education
industry. For example, the resource-based view (RBV) theory has been used to
explain how educational institutions can develop sustainable competitive advantage
through the adoption of sustainable practices (Li and colleagues, 2016). The RBV
theory suggests that organizations can gain competitive advantage by developing and
utilizing unique resources and capabilities, including sustainability practices.
Research has demonstrated that sustainability practices can positively impact
organizational performance in the education industry. For example, a study by Choi
and colleagues (2021) found that sustainability practices, such as energy efficiency
and waste reduction, can lead to cost savings and improved operational efficiency in
higher education institutions.
In addition to economic benefits, sustainability practices can also lead to improved
social and environmental outcomes, which are important considerations for
educational institutions. For example, the adoption of sustainable practices in
educational facilities can improve the health and well-being of students and staff,
reduce the institution's carbon footprint, and promote environmental stewardship
(Preston, 2018). Moreover, the incorporation of sustainability principles into
educational programs can help prepare students for the evolving needs of the
workforce and society. Research has found that graduates of programs with a focus on
sustainability are more likely to be employed in fields related to sustainability and
environmental management (Van der Werff and colleagues, 2014).

The challenges and issues:

Organizations in the education industry, like those in other sectors, face several
sustainability barriers, paradoxes, and challenges. One significant challenge is the cost
of implementing sustainable practices. Sustainable practices often require significant
investment in new technology, infrastructure, and training, which can be financially

5
challenging for educational institutions, particularly those with limited resources
(Dlouhá and colleagues, 2018). Moreover, organizations in the education industry
face a paradox between sustainability goals and the need to remain competitive.
While sustainable practices can enhance organizational performance and
competitiveness, they may conflict with other organizational priorities, such as
enrollment growth and revenue generation (González-Álvarez and colleagues, 2020).
This tension may result in a reluctance to implement sustainable practices.
Another significant challenge faced by educational institutions is the lack of
awareness and understanding of sustainability issues among students, faculty, and
staff. Educational institutions have a critical role to play in promoting sustainability
education and awareness-raising, but research indicates that sustainability is often not
a priority in educational programs and curricula (Wals and colleagues, 2014). Without
adequate education and awareness, sustainable practices may not be prioritized or
implemented effectively.
However, despite these challenges, several educational institutions have successfully
implemented sustainable practices. For example, the University of California system
has committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2025 and has implemented a range of
sustainable practices, including energy efficiency upgrades, renewable energy
installations, and sustainable transportation initiatives (University of California,
2021).
Furthermore, the Copenhagen Business School in Denmark has made sustainability a
core focus of its business curriculum and has implemented sustainable practices
throughout its operations, resulting in improved environmental outcomes and cost
savings (Copenhagen Business School, 2021).
In conclusion, while educational institutions face significant sustainability barriers,
paradoxes, and challenges, several examples demonstrate that it is possible to
overcome these obstacles and implement effective sustainable practices. With proper
investment, education, and commitment, educational institutions can improve their
economic, social, and environmental performance and contribute to a more
sustainable future.

6
The opportunity:

Organizations in the education industry can implement various strategies to achieve

sustainable development. One approach is to adopt new and emerging business
models that prioritize sustainability. For example, educational institutions can
leverage the sharing economy model by sharing resources, such as equipment,
facilities, and expertise, to reduce waste and increase efficiency (Li and colleagues,
2018). This approach can help educational institutions optimize their use of resources
and reduce their environmental impact.
Another strategy is to implement sustainable processes and technologies. For instance,
educational institutions can adopt sustainable procurement practices to ensure that the
products and services they purchase are environmentally and socially responsible
(Chapman and colleagues, 2016). Additionally, the adoption of renewable energy
technologies, such as solar and wind power, can help educational institutions reduce
their carbon footprint and achieve energy independence (Kuznetsova and colleagues,
2019).
Moreover, educational institutions can promote sustainability through their academic
programs and curricula. By incorporating sustainability principles into their
educational programs, educational institutions can raise awareness and educate future
leaders about sustainability issues and solutions (Lozano and colleagues, 2013). For
example, some educational institutions offer degree programs in sustainability and
environmental studies, which prepare students for careers in sustainable development.
Furthermore, educational institutions can collaborate with other stakeholders, such as
government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and industry partners, to
promote sustainability. Through collaboration, educational institutions can leverage
their resources and expertise to develop and implement sustainable development
initiatives that address complex sustainability challenges (Godeman and Hekkert,
2019).
Overall, by adopting new business models, implementing sustainable processes and
technologies, promoting sustainability through their academic programs, and
collaborating with stakeholders, educational institutions can achieve sustainable

7
development. These strategies have been supported by strong academic research and
evidence and have the potential to contribute to a more sustainable future for the
education industry and society as a whole.

Recommendations and Conclusion:

Based on the preceding analysis and critical evaluation of sustainability in the

education industry, organizations can take the following specific actions to address
the three pillars of sustainability:

Economic Sustainability: Organizations in the education industry can focus on

economic sustainability by implementing the following strategies:
1. Sustainable Procurement: Educational institutions can adopt sustainable
procurement practices to reduce their environmental impact and promote
economic sustainability. This involves sourcing products and services from
suppliers who adhere to ethical, environmental, and social standards. The
implementation of a sustainable procurement policy can help organizations to
reduce waste, save costs, and improve their environmental and social impact
(Chapman et al., 2016).
2. Sustainable Revenue Streams: Organizations can develop sustainable
revenue streams by offering sustainable products and services, such as green
energy and sustainable food options. Educational institutions can explore the
use of renewable energy sources such as solar panels to generate their own
electricity, reducing their energy costs and carbon footprint (Mergos et al.,
2020).

Social Sustainability: To address social sustainability, organizations in the education

industry can prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The following
are some strategies that educational institutions can adopt:

1. Access to Education: Organizations can promote access to education for

underrepresented groups such as minorities, low-income families, and

8
 individuals with disabilities. This can be achieved by offering scholarships,
financial assistance, and other support services to help these groups overcome
systemic barriers to education (Baird et al., 2021).
2. Community Engagement: Educational institutions can collaborate with
community organizations to address social issues and promote sustainable
development. By engaging with the local community, organizations can gain a
better understanding of the needs and concerns of their stakeholders and
develop strategies that promote social sustainability (Chapman et al., 2016).

Environmental Sustainability: To address environmental sustainability, educational

institutions can adopt the following strategies:

1. Renewable Energy: Educational institutions can implement renewable energy

technologies, such as solar and wind power, to reduce their carbon footprint
and promote energy independence. These technologies can also help
organizations to reduce their energy costs and improve their environmental
impact (Kuznetsova et al., 2019).
2. Sustainable Transportation: Educational institutions can promote
sustainable transportation practices, such as encouraging walking, cycling, and
public transportation, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. By providing
incentives for employees and students to use sustainable modes of
transportation, organizations can reduce traffic congestion and improve air
quality (Hedenus et al., 2020).
3. Sustainable Food Systems: Educational institutions can promote sustainable
food systems by sourcing local, organic, and sustainably produced food
products. This can help to reduce the environmental impact of food production
and promote healthy eating habits among employees and students (Bellows et
al., 2017).

In conclusion, organizations in the education industry can address the three pillars of
sustainability by implementing sustainable procurement practices, developing
sustainable revenue streams, promoting access to education, engaging with the local
community, implementing renewable energy technologies, promoting sustainable
transportation practices, and promoting sustainable food systems (Refer to appendix

9
3). These recommendations are supported by academic research and evidence and
have the potential to contribute to a more sustainable future for the education industry
and society as a whole.

10
References:

Anderson, B., Rutherford, J., & Rennie, A. (2018). The Triple Bottom Line as a
Framework for Sustainable University Performance: An Exploratory Study. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 172, 4086-4097.
Anderson, E., Donnelly, K., & McGarraghy, S. (2018). Applying the Triple Bottom
Line Framework to Assess the Sustainability Performance of UK Universities.
Sustainability, 10(6), 2022. doi:10.3390/su10062022
Baird, L., Post, J., & Nord, M. (2021). Improving equity and access to higher
education. Education Next, 21(1), 46-51.
Bellows, A. C., Hamm, M. W., & Wright, A. L. (2017). Sustainable food systems for
optimal planetary health. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 12(2), 129-
150.
Bennett, D., & James, P. (2019). Integrating the Sustainable Development Goals and
the Triple Bottom Line into University Management Systems. Sustainability, 11(17),
4528. doi:10.3390/su11174528
Chapman, A., Glegg, G., & Heynen, N. (2016). Greening the supply chain: The case
of sustainable procurement in the public sector. Journal of Environmental Policy &
Planning, 18(2), 154-167.
Chapman, P., Armstrong, A., & Harris, L. (2016). Procuring for Good: How can
public and third sector organisations work together to improve public procurement?.
Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 537-551.
Choi, S. H., Lee, C. K., & Yoo, S. H. (2021). The Impact of Sustainability Practices
on Operational Efficiency in Higher Education Institutions: A Resource-Based View.
Sustainability, 13(4), 1897.
Copenhagen Business School. (2021). CBS Sustainability. Retrieved
from https://www.cbs.dk/en/research/departments-and-centres/department-of-
management-society-and-communication/cbs-sustainability
Dlouhá, J., Henderson, L., Kapitulčinová, D., Mader, C., & Zagorsek, H. (2018).
Barriers and opportunities for sustainable development at university level: A view

11
from Czech, English and German universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172,
3508-3520.
Dlouhá, J., Pospíšilová, M., & Barton, A. (2018). Sustainability in Higher Education
Institutions in the Czech Republic: Barriers and Opportunities for Change. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 172, 3457-3465.
El Zoghbi, M., Eckel, J., & Gallagher, R. (2018). Financing Public Higher Education:
Lessons from Developing Countries. American Council on Education. Retrieved
from https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Financing-Public-Higher-Education.pdf
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2010). Managing for Stakeholders:
Survival, Reputation, and Success. Yale University Press.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2010). The Stakeholder Theory:
Concepts and Strategies. Cambridge University Press.
Godeman, J., & Hekkert, M. (2019). Collaboration for sustainable development:
Assessing university-industry partnerships. Sustainability, 11(22), 6232.
González-Álvarez, N., Carmona-Moreno, E., Lozano, R., & Farías-Espejel, R. (2020).
Balancing sustainable development and institutional competitiveness: Insights from
higher education institutions. Sustainability, 12(18), 7635.
González-Álvarez, N., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2020). The
Paradox of Organizational Sustainability and Competitive Priorities: The Role of
Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Business Research, 113, 277-286.
Hedenus, F., Wirsenius, S., & Johansson, D. J. (2020). The importance of reduced
meat and dairy consumption for meeting stringent climate targets. Climatic Change,
162(2), 307-318.
Holmes, R. (2021). The Global Education Market Will Reach $10 Trillion by 2030.
Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanholmes/2021/06/01/the-
global-education-market-will-reach-10-trillion-by-2030/?sh=19f3af7613f7
Holmes, S. (2021). The Global Education Market is Projected to Reach $10 Trillion
by 2030. Forbes. Retrieved
from https://www.forbes.com/sites/sherikoones/2021/06/28/the-global-education-
market-is-projected-to-reach-10-trillion-by-2030/?sh=78fc6c59648b
Kats, G., Alevantis, L., Berman, A., Mills, E., & Perlman, J. (2006). The Costs and
Financial Benefits of Green Buildings: A Report to California's Sustainable Building
Task Force. California Sustainable Building Task Force.

12
Kuznetsova, E., Fomin, S., & Ivashkina, O. (2019). Sustainable development of
educational institutions: Integration of renewable energy sources. Sustainability,
11(20), 5741.
Li, C., Lin, C., & Chen, Y. (2016). The impact of environmental management on firm
performance: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 112(1), 422-431.
Li, X., Zhao, X., & Lu, W. (2018). Leveraging the sharing economy model for
sustainable development: An emerging research agenda. Sustainability, 10(12), 4427.
Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F.J., &
Waas, T. (2013). A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable
development in higher education: Results from a worldwide survey. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 61, 8-17.
Mergos, G., Ioannidis, S., & Doudoumis, I. (2020). Sustainability in higher education:
A systematic review with focus on the supply chain management perspective. Journal
of Cleaner Production, 246, 119025.
Preston, C. J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability education: A
review and critique. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2284-2295.
Rojas-Contreras, J. A., Heredia-López, F. J., Rodríguez-Márquez, P. E., & Martínez-
Ruiz, F. J. (2018). The Impact of Natural Lighting and Ventilation on the Cognitive
Performance of Students in Educational Environments. Sustainability, 10(8), 2691.
doi:10.3390/su10082691
Rojas-Contreras, J. A., Lucena-Muñoz, D. F., Mena-Nieto, Á., & García-Hernández,
A. (2018). Sustainable Educational Facilities: Effects on the Cognitive Performance
of Primary School Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health, 15(12), 2740.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2016). Global Environment
Outlook - GEO-6: Regional Assessments. United Nations Environment Programme.
Retrieved from https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/global-environment-
outlook-geo-6-regional-assessments
United Nations Environment Programme. (2016). Sustainable Buildings and Climate
Initiative: Global Status Report 2016. United Nations Environment Programme.
Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/resources/report/sustainable-buildings-and-
climate-initiative-global-status-report-2016

13
University of California. (2021). UC Carbon Neutrality Initiative. Retrieved
from https://www.ucop.edu/sustainability/initiatives/climate-neutrality.html
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2014). The Value of Environmental Self-
Identity: The Relationship Between Biospheric Values, Environmental Self-Identity
and Environmental Preferences, Behaviour, and Beliefs. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 40, 269-278.
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2014). The value of environmental self-
identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and
environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 40, 59-72.
Wals, A. E. J., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence
between Science and Environmental Education. Science, 344(6184
Wals, A. E., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between
science and environmental education. Science, 344(6184), 583-584.

14
Appendices:

Appendix 1:

Appendix 2:

15
 Source: urban sci, 2022

Appendix 3:

Source: Irsan, 2019

16