Rizal and Nationalism Lysa Caloyloy Mr. Kim Bartolo LPT
Jose Rizal is commonly known as the “Father of Filipino
Nationalism” and the first Filipino”, not because he helped establish an independent Philippine State (in fact, he specifically and explicitly denounced the 1896 Revolution against Spain), but because he was instrumental in the creation of conceptualization of “Filipino” as an ethnopolitical collective- as “a people” ,or, in Language of nationalism “the people”. In other words, Rizal is acclaimed the father “Philippine Nationalism” for his intellectual and idealistic support for Philippine independence. As an analysis of his works and speeches will show, Rizal did not support violent uprising or revolutions in calling for an independent state. He was not a war monger but rather an academic seeking as much a possible as peaceful, logical, and political solution for the independence of Filipino from colonial rule over the political and social aspect of life in the Philippines. He peached for and encouraged Filipinos to recognize their potential as Filipino citizens and also their obligations and duty to their motherland.
The definition of Nationalism and elements that
contribute to nationalism Nationalism is a sentiment in which a person manifests his pride in being part of a nation. A person who exhibits nationalism shows his loyalty to the nation for which he is willing to serve it’s interests. Nation refers to the people identified as occupying a certain peace of territory. These people developed an attachment to the territory or the land that sustained them. That land provided their livelihood and they have lived on that land for generations. As a people occupying a certain territory, they developed their own culture, a way of a life and a way of interacting and governing each other. The people became identified with the land and they developed a certain affection and attachment to it. The essence of nationalism and patriotism is living of what truly a Filipino, living by our culture, keeping it alive, keeping it vibrant and for always retaining of our Filipino tradition so, first respect our Philippine flag, second, be a productive citizen, third commemorate our national hero in our country fourth, preserve our culture various norms beliefs and celebrate our first different festivals in our country, five don’t be ashamed of using our comments and we can, lastly patronize our own local products. There are things that tests our nationalism and patriotism what is important though is that we stand united as Filipino and we love Philippines as our mother county.
NATION, AN IMAGINED COMMUNITY?
According to writer Benedict Anderson a nation is an imagined community because it created delineations and artificial boundaries. Some boundaries are not natural or geographical in nature but were created by human actions. These include latitudes and longitudes that appear on a map or a globe. Often political boundaries are problematic that cause disputes with neighbors especially when there are no natural features that would serve as points of reference.
MODELS FOR NATIONALISM
To demonstrate the formation of nationalism, history provides various examples how it develops in various countries.
The French, English, Russian and Spanish Models
The formation of nations of Spain, France and England took place in the middle Ages. Ethnic groups sharing the same language heritage, which is a mixture of native and Roman influences, helped from distinct identifies for the three countries. The three countries were former part of the old Roman Empire. There histories had parallel events: all three are invaded by barbarian tribes after the fall of the Western Empire. The mixture of cultures in each country created a character that is unique. There is a quality of being French among the people of France and “Englishness”. Being French separated the French people from the non-French like the Belgians, Germans and the Dutch and as for the English; their English character separated them from the Scots and the Welsh. The people of both countries rallied themselves around a monarch to whom they pledged their loyalty. That monarch was expected to rule his people as a monarch would do. The unique ethnicity created a cultural quality for each people. This included the evolution and development of language and their way of life. Ethnicity therefore was a key to nationalism in both countries. Adding to ethnicity was the force of religion. The franks who later became the French were ordered by the Frankish king Clovis to adopt the Christian religion under the pain of death. The adoption of Christianity solidified his authority over the various Frankish tribes and Clovis is considered the father of the French nation. Thus to be French is to speak the French language, follow French customs and to become a Christian.
The American Model
During the 17th century, various English settlers came to North America. Primarily the English came to colonize the newly found continent and to expand the empire. But there colonists were a diverse group: some like the Catholic who found Boston and Baltimore so they can freely practice their religion. These was the same reason for the Quakers who came to Pennsylvania were looking for a place where they can freely practice their religion; others were looking for a place to settle. Eventually they formed the thirteen English colonies in the Eastern part of North America. As the colonies settled down, they created their own culture that was different and unique to their original English roots. Even the language spoken by the colonists in American was different from the one spoken in England. Though considering themselves as loyal Englishmen the colonists developed an attachment to the land that they have called their own, build their homes, and raised their families.
The Latin American Models
Modern nationalism in Latin America was started by descendants of Spanish immigrants to South America. When the Spaniard settled in areas what are now Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Peru Columbia and Venezuela their children were called criollios or creoles. They were distinct from Peninsulares or the Spaniards born in the Ibarian Peninsula. As creoles, they were subject to discrimination by the Peninsulare. In many cases, only top positions in the colonial government were allocated to the Peninsulares while the creollos served as sub alterns or lower- ranking officials. Some Spaniards had children with native Americans and they became mestizos and mulattos. They became a class and served at positions, which the criollos and the Peninsulars would not accept. At the bottom were the native Americans and the descendants of African slaves who were the most oppressed of the group.
The Italian Model
Italy was the seat of the Roman Empire and the birth place of the Renaissance. However, in the 1800s it was decided into Papal States and the States of Sicily and Sardinia and the Grand Duchy at Tuscany. Parts of it were under foreign domination such as Venice being occupied by Austria. Drawing from the greatness of the past, Italian nationalists launched the Risorgimento or the resurgence. The Risorgimento to was actually a war for unification. Italian nationalists led by Giuseppe Garibaldi, Giuseppe Mazzini and Camilo de Cavour drove out the Austrians and pushed the Pope to what is now the Vatican City. They absorted Tuscany into the new state, which became the Kingdom of Italy. In launching the Risorgimento, the knowledge of Italy’s great past played an important role in the formation of the Italian state. The Italians set aside their regional differences and we’re united in the forming of a new nation.
NATIONALISM AS A WAY OF CHANGE
Nationalism need not be directed against a foreign enemy. It can be caused or aroused as a response to a need for change. During the French Revolution, the French people rose against the monarchy in 1789. The monarchy was perceived by the ordinary Frenchmen as aloof and insensitive to the growing social problems such as poverty and widespread hunger. While the nobles and clergy were free from taxation and to support the wars France fought with it’s enemies aside from having their sons to go off to war. News that their king Louis XV1 was trying to flee to Austria caused the Frenchmen to demand his execution, as well as that of his wife, Queen Marie Antoinette. NATIONALISM IN THE PHILIPPINE CONTEXT In the Philippines, nationalism is associated with the word bayanihan. The etymological root of the term is the bayan. Bayan in common usage means a town. It also means a community and to an extension it may mean a country. To do something for the bayan, cannotes an unselfish act. This act is given voluntarily to help others. People who helped others. People who helped others and did unselfish sacrifices even at the risk of losing their lives are recognized as bayanis or heroes. Whenever the word bayanihan is mentioned, the image of a nipa house carried on the shoulders of the neighbors of the owners comes to mind. The ones who were carrying the house were volunteers who were not forced to carry the house. They probably did it out of sympathy or solidarity with the owner of the house. The story behind the image according to former President Diosdado Macapagal was that the house stood on a land, which did not belong to the house owner. When the owner of the land demanded that he leaves his property, the neighbors of the house owner took pitty upon on him and with the help of the other neighbors. Lifted the house to it’s new location. Bayanihan or nationalism caanotes a sense of community. The pain suffered by one ie. Being evicted from the land was felt by the neighbors who decide to help him. This is called damayan.
BAYAN, BANSA AND KALAYAAN AND THE GOAL OF FILIPINO
NATIONALISM Eventually the bayan, which is more of a communal perspective, will graduate into the bands. Bansa means the nation and it also means the state. The components of a state is it’s land or the area occupied by the bayan: the government, the institution that protects and advances the interest of the bayan; it’s sovereignty or kalayaan the power of the bayan to decide and chart its own destiny and it’s most important component, the people which is also called bayan. The bansa or bangsa in the Malay language is the Community of the bayan and it’s laws and institution.
RIZAL AND HOW HIS WORK HELPED DEVELOP NATIONALISM
In his desire to develop and instill a sense of nation in the minds of the people of his time Rizal looked back to that past through the history of the Philippines. In his essay “The Philippines A Century Hence”, he begins with a line “In order to know the destiny of a nation, it is important to open the book of it’s past.” Rizal was living in a time when there was a wholesale adoption of everything that was European and the rejection of what is native. The spanish colonizers thought of themselves as superior to the indios and without their help the natives of the Philippines will remain backward. How did Rizal become a nationalist? Rizal was not born to be a nationalist though he had shown such inclination. When he was studying at the Ateneo in Manila, he studied under the sculptor Teodoro Romualdo de Jesus known as “Lolong” de Jesus impressed on the young Riz the need to preserve the heritage of the acestors of the Filipinos. He taught Rizal about greatness of the Filipino culture before the arrival of the Spaniards. The character in the novel Noli Me Tangere Filosoto Radio was inspired by his mentor Teodoro Romualdo de Jesus who in 1888 founded a group called katipunan. It’s objective was to tell Filipinos about their glorious past and the need to go back to their roots. De jesus katipunan antedated the kataastaasang kagallanggalangang katipunan ng mga anal ng bayan (KKK) founded by Teodoro Plata, Deodato Arrelano and Andres Bonifacio in July 1892.