Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transformer Foundation Calculation R1
Transformer Foundation Calculation R1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 SCOPE OF THE REPORT ............................................................................................................................................................. 2
1
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
2
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
3
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
3.71. Calculations:
Assume seismic load acting at 1/2*HT from the base = 1.0275 m
Total lever arm at plinth base of seismic load = 1.8275 m
Transverse direction
Design bedrock acceleration = 0.05g
Seismic zone factor,Z = 0.05
Importance factor,I = 1
Numerical factor = 2.75
Structure factor Rw = 3.00
Shear force,V = 0.07W
Force due to seismic V= = 4.721 kN
Moment at bottom of transformer due to seismic load = 8.627 KN·m
Along transverse side of transformer
Moment at bottom of transformer due to Longitudinal = 8.627 KN·m
seismic load
Gravity loads
Volume of RCC raft = 0.756 m3
Volume of concrete pedestals = 0.896 m3
Volume of concrete pedestals + raft = 1.652 m3
Weight of concrete block + raft Volume*Density of = 41.3 KN
Concrete
Total dead weight (transformer + concrete) = 51.8 KN
Static moments
Static moment @ longitudinal direction = 0 KN·m
Static moment @ transverse direction = 0 KN·m
4
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
Pressure check
Foundation design pressure shall always be critical with no GWT condition. hence foundation is designed for
the dry condition. assume foundation size
Raft width B = 1.6 m
Raft length L = 1.89 m
Area A = 3.024 m2
WL=LB2/6 = 0.8064 m3
WT=BL2/6 = 0.952 m3
Net allowable SBC SBC = 150 KN/m2
Pmax=P/A + MT/WT + ML/WL = 43.23 KN/m2 150
Pmax = 43.23 KN/m2 150
5
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
The raft foundation is analysed for the above loading including self weight as per EN1997-1:2004.
In accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the UK National Annex incorporating
Corrigendum No.1.
Raft reinforcement is evaluated as per EN1992-1-1:2004
In accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated January 2008 and the UK National Annex incorporating
National Amendment No.1.
RC RAFT DESIGN
In accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 incorporating corrigendum January 2008 and the UK national annex
Tedds calculation version 1.0.18
Raft definition
;
Type of raft; Two way spanning with restrained edges
Overall slab depth; h = 250 mm
Shorter effective span of panel; lx = 1600 mm
Longer effective span of panel; ly = 1890 mm
Support conditions; Four edges continuous (interior panel)
Top outer layer of reinforcement; Short span direction
Bottom outer layer of reinforcement; Short span direction
Loading
Characteristic permanent action; Gk = 1.0 kN/m2
Characteristic variable action; Qk = 38.8 kN/m2
6
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
Concrete properties
Concrete strength class; C25/30
Characteristic cylinder strength; fck = 25 N/mm2
Partial factor (Table 2.1N); gC = 1.50
Compressive strength factor (cl. 3.1.6); acc = 0.85
Design compressive strength (cl. 3.1.6); fcd = 14.2 N/mm2
Mean axial tensile strength (Table 3.1); fctm = 0.30 N/mm2 ´ (fck / 1 N/mm2)2/3 = 2.6 N/mm2
Maximum aggregate size; dg = 20 mm
Reinforcement properties
Characteristic yield strength; fyk = 460 N/mm2
Partial factor (Table 2.1N); gS = 1.15
Design yield strength (fig. 3.8); fyd = fyk / gS = 400.0 N/mm2
Concrete cover to reinforcement
Nominal cover to outer top reinforcement; cnom_t = 30 mm
Nominal cover to outer bottom reinforcement; cnom_b = 30 mm
Fire resistance period to top of slab; Rtop = 60 min
Fire resistance period to bottom of slab; Rbtm = 60 min
Axia distance to top reinft (Table 5.8); afi_t = 10 mm
Axia distance to bottom reinft (Table 5.8); afi_b = 10 mm
Min. top cover requirement with regard to bond; cmin,b_t = 12 mm
Min. btm cover requirement with regard to bond; cmin,b_b = 12 mm
Reinforcement fabrication; Subject to QA system
Cover allowance for deviation; Dcdev = 5 mm
Min. required nominal cover to top reinft; cnom_t_min = 17.0 mm
Min. required nominal cover to bottom reinft; cnom_b_min = 17.0 mm
PASS - There is sufficient cover to the top reinforcement
PASS - There is sufficient cover to the bottom reinforcement
Reinforcement design at midspan in short span direction (cl.6.1)
Bending moment coefficient; bsx_p = 0.0312
Design bending moment; Mx_p = bsx_p q lx2 = 4.8 kNm/m
Reinforcement provided; 12 mm dia. bars at 150 mm centres
Area provided; Asx_p = 754 mm2/m
Effective depth to tension reinforcement; dx_p = h - cnom_b - fx_p / 2 = 214.0 mm
K factor; K = Mx_p / (b dx_p2 fck) = 0.004
Redistribution ratio; d = 1.0
7
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
8
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
9
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
Reinforcement sketch
The following sketch is indicative only. Note that additional reinforcement may be required in accordance with clauses 9.2.1.2, 9.2.1.4 and
9.2.1.5 of EN 1992-1-1:2004 to meet detailing rules.
10
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
RC WALL DESIGN
In accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 incorporating corrigendum January 2008 and the UK national annex
Tedds calculation version 1.1.02
11
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
12
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
Column slenderness
Radius of gyration about minor axis; i = h / (12) = 5.8 cm
Minor axis slenderness ratio (5.8.3.2(1)); l = l0 / i = 24.2
13
PROJECT:
ENGINEERING DESIGN, SUPPLY, INSTALLATION,
TESTING AND
14