You are on page 1of 2

536

regain, the prehistory of the fabric before the change of sis about the dependence of wrinkling behavior on the
moisture regain, and fiber fineness. The effect of the change of rigidity. It is, in fact, highly probable that the
fineness is demonstrated in Figure 1. The difference same hypothesis holds also for other
between the minimum value and the equilibrium value of
hygroscopic fibers
[1, 7]. To improve the wrinkling properties for a given
the wrinkling angle (deformation time 60 min, structure of a wool fabric, the sensitivity of the fibers
recovery
time 20 min) was less for the coarse wool ( 10° ) than to changes in moisture regain must be One
the difference between the corresponding values obtained possible method would be cross-linking reactions. It is, diminished.
with the Merino wool fabric (30°). therefore, interesting to observe that Katz [3] found a
reduted wrinkling after a treatment with mercuric ’

acetate.

Literature Cited
1.Farrow, B., J. Textile Inst. 42, T534-536 (1951).
2.Haly, A. R. and Feughelman, Textile Res. J. 31,
131-134 (1961).
3. Katz, H. J., Textile Res. J. 36, 874-887 (1966).
4. Lindberg, J., Textile Res. J. 31, 695-696 (1961).
5. Mackay, B. H. and Downes, J. G., J. Appl. Polymer
Sci. 2 , 32-38 (1959).
6. Nordon, P., Textile Res. J. 32, 560-568 (1962).
7. Silén, G. and Lindberg, J., Textile Res. J. 35, 1053-
Fig. 1. Wrinkling angle vs steeping time 1054 (1965).
before deformation.
8. van der Valk, T., Textil och Konfektion 23, 16-17
The dynamic fiber rigidity modulus varies in the same (1966).
way with the above mentioned factors ; hence, the fiber Vibeke Køpke and
properties are probably of the greatest importance for H. K. Dalen
the wrinkling behavior of wool fabrics, and the results
of the experiments may be taken to support the hypothe-
Norwegian Textile Research Institute
. .
Forskningsveien 1, Oslo 3
_

The Prediction of Cotton Yarn 1


Strengths
’ ’
February 15, 1967 control of spinning quality can be obtained, means must
Dear Sir: ’

be available for fixing a fiber quality level in a quanti-


A method for characterizing the yarn strength poten- tative way, so that fibers can be chosen and modified
tial of cotton by the use of a single parameter is de- intelligently.
Cotton spinning laboratories throughout
I

scribed~ this method was used to construct reference the world


tables for the skein breaking strength of a wide range spin cotton yarns using only a twist level that gives
of yarn numbers, twists, and cotton quality levels. maximum yarn strength. These results, while valuable,
are of little help to those interested in the
The prodtiction of a uniform, coherent yarn is the strength of
other yarn constructions, such as the low-twisted knit-
prime essential of a textile staple fiber ; without this
quality, it has only limited use. The spinning of fibers ting yarns or yarns used for weaving into industrial
into yarns is a craft that has its roots in empirical tra- fabrics. Data on groups of cotton varieties remain little
more than a mass of facts, giving guidance, but no rules
dttion. Spinners choose their cottons largely on their
for the .improvement of cotton quality.
suitability for processing, with few end breaks, into F. T. Peirce [1] first suggested a method for analysis
yarns of acceptable breaking-strength levels. Before
of yarn strength when he proposed the correlation of
1
Bogdan’s Yarn Strength Tables, PB174212, Federal yarn strength with three parameters. A thorough de-
Clearing House of Scientific and Technical Information, scription of the contribution of any fiber to the strength
Springfield, Virginia 22151, $3.00. of its yarns can be obtained by the application of four

Downloaded from trj.sagepub.com at Freie Universitaet Berlin on July 1, 2015


537

parameters [2], from which the general equation for the to give
skein breaking strength of any yarn wasdeveloped.

Replacing k, T, and F in Equation 1 with their con-


where k =
obliquity and conversion
correction for fiber
verted valuesgives the prediction equation for the skein
breaking strength in pounds of any carded cotton yarn
to single thread breaking length,

fiber obliquity parameter); P


1 + B + 160 BM
(B is the
intrinsic strength
=
spun from a mix to which a Q number has been
assigned. ,

parameter; C cotton system yarn number; M


= =

twist multiplier; T ineffective twist parameter; and


=

F =
drafting parameter. ,

In cotton fiber, strength parameters have systematic


interrelationships that permit the ultimate in a yarn
strength method: description by a single parameter. Thisexpression for the strength of cotton yarns has
Equation 1 contains two independent variables, yarn two independent variables, yarn number and twist multi-
number and twist, and four parameters. A prediction plier, and only one grand parameter Q.
of the strength of any yarn can be made from this Prediction tables have been constructed from this
relationship only after the values for the parameters relationship for the strength of carded cotton yarns
have been established, and this would require the spin- ranging in number from 4&dquo; to 80&dquo; (in increments of one
ning and testing of a minimum of four yarns processed number) for twist multipliers from 2.5 to 5.5 (in incre-
from the one lot of fiber. ments of 0.1 T M) and cotton quality indexes from 18
The analysis for cotton yarns expresses the parameters to 35 (in increments of one index number).
in terms of one, the intrinsic strength parameter P; this The quality index for a cotton mix is fixed by having
the breaking strength of only one yarn of known size
parameter, when it is used alone to describe cotton
is calleq Q, the quality index. and twist. With this identification, any yarn number,
quality,
The fiber angle parameter B is found to be relatively spun at any twist, can be estimated from the tables.
constant for all cottons at a value of 0.014, so the allow- The strength of combed yarns has been found to in-
crease above that of carded yarns at the rate of 0.8%
ance for loss in yarn strength due to fiber angularity
with conversion to breaking length units of hanks per for each 1 ~o increase in the amount of comber waste
thread becomes for cotton removed. This relationship is used to adapt the cotton
yarn strength tables to the analysis of combed yarn
strengths. It is for this reason that the strength values
in the tables were extended to include yarn numbers as
high as 80&dquo;, a fineness that exceeds the commercial
Long, fine cottons, from which very strong yarns can spinning limit for carded cotton yarns.
be spun, reach their optimum strengths at lower twist
multipliers than do short, coarse cottons that yield low Acknowledgment
levels of yarn strength. As a consequehce, the value
for the ineffective twist parameter T decreases as the
Appreciation expressed to The Textile and Applied
is
Technology Program of the Institute for Applied Tech-
Q value increases. The dependence of I’ on Q is found ’

nology, National Bureau of Standards, U. S. Depart-


to be fitted by
ment of Commerce, whose support through Contract
Cc6235 made this work possible.

The relationship between yarn tenacity and yarn Literature Cited ,

number is linear. In cotton spinning practice, it is 1. Peirce, F. T., Textile Forum (2) : 2, 22-23
3 (May
recognized that strong cottons lose yarn tenacity with 1946).
increasing yarn number at a lower rate than do the weak 2. Bogdan, J. F., Textile Res. J. , 9, 720-730 (1956).
26
cottons. It is this characteristic that raises the spin-
ning limit of long, fine, and strong cottons and permits J. F. Bogdan
them to he spun into very fine yarn numbers. The School of Textiles
drafting parameter F has been fitted in terms of Q North Carolina State University at Raleigh

Downloaded from trj.sagepub.com at Freie Universitaet Berlin on July 1, 2015

You might also like