Professional Documents
Culture Documents
regain, the prehistory of the fabric before the change of sis about the dependence of wrinkling behavior on the
moisture regain, and fiber fineness. The effect of the change of rigidity. It is, in fact, highly probable that the
fineness is demonstrated in Figure 1. The difference same hypothesis holds also for other
between the minimum value and the equilibrium value of
hygroscopic fibers
[1, 7]. To improve the wrinkling properties for a given
the wrinkling angle (deformation time 60 min, structure of a wool fabric, the sensitivity of the fibers
recovery
time 20 min) was less for the coarse wool ( 10° ) than to changes in moisture regain must be One
the difference between the corresponding values obtained possible method would be cross-linking reactions. It is, diminished.
with the Merino wool fabric (30°). therefore, interesting to observe that Katz [3] found a
reduted wrinkling after a treatment with mercuric ’
acetate.
Literature Cited
1.Farrow, B., J. Textile Inst. 42, T534-536 (1951).
2.Haly, A. R. and Feughelman, Textile Res. J. 31,
131-134 (1961).
3. Katz, H. J., Textile Res. J. 36, 874-887 (1966).
4. Lindberg, J., Textile Res. J. 31, 695-696 (1961).
5. Mackay, B. H. and Downes, J. G., J. Appl. Polymer
Sci. 2 , 32-38 (1959).
6. Nordon, P., Textile Res. J. 32, 560-568 (1962).
7. Silén, G. and Lindberg, J., Textile Res. J. 35, 1053-
Fig. 1. Wrinkling angle vs steeping time 1054 (1965).
before deformation.
8. van der Valk, T., Textil och Konfektion 23, 16-17
The dynamic fiber rigidity modulus varies in the same (1966).
way with the above mentioned factors ; hence, the fiber Vibeke Køpke and
properties are probably of the greatest importance for H. K. Dalen
the wrinkling behavior of wool fabrics, and the results
of the experiments may be taken to support the hypothe-
Norwegian Textile Research Institute
. .
Forskningsveien 1, Oslo 3
_
parameters [2], from which the general equation for the to give
skein breaking strength of any yarn wasdeveloped.
F =
drafting parameter. ,
number is linear. In cotton spinning practice, it is 1. Peirce, F. T., Textile Forum (2) : 2, 22-23
3 (May
recognized that strong cottons lose yarn tenacity with 1946).
increasing yarn number at a lower rate than do the weak 2. Bogdan, J. F., Textile Res. J. , 9, 720-730 (1956).
26
cottons. It is this characteristic that raises the spin-
ning limit of long, fine, and strong cottons and permits J. F. Bogdan
them to he spun into very fine yarn numbers. The School of Textiles
drafting parameter F has been fitted in terms of Q North Carolina State University at Raleigh