Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/biombioe
Abstract
Biomass material, including sawdust, rice husks, peanut shells, coconut ®bres and palm fruit ®bres, was densi®ed
into briquettes at modest pressures of 5±7 MPa using a piston and die type of press. The briquettes were tested to
evaluate their relaxation behaviour, mechanical strength and burning characteristics. The sawdust briquettes were
found to have better overall handling characteristics. But briquettes of dierent biomass materials required dierent
optimum conditions of fabrication and generally showed a promising potential for further development. 7 2000
Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Biomass; Briquette; Densi®cation; Properties; Burning rates; Sawdust; Rice husk; Peanut; Coconut; Palm
0961-9534/00/$ - see front matter 7 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 6 1 - 9 5 3 4 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 8 4 - 7
224 O.C. Chin, K.M. Siddiqui / Biomass and Bioenergy 18 (2000) 223±228
Table 1
Biowaste sizes and calori®c value
Biowaste material Diameter range for 60% collected particles (mm) HCV (MJ/kg)
rate. Biomass such as rice husks, peanut shells, its length recovery or relaxation in length was
coconut ®bres and palm ®bres needed some pro- measured with time, varying from 2 min to 1
cessing to reduce the particle size, before it could week. Generally it was found that the maximum
be briquetted. The size range of particles after relaxation occurred within 10 min after the com-
processing and the calori®c value (HCV) of the paction pressure was removed followed by a
biowaste material are given in Table 1. To make gradually decreasing relaxation for about 2 h for
briquettes, usually 4 g of the material was com- all types of biowaste briquettes. Also as the die
pacted under a modest pressure of up to 7 MPa pressure increased from 0.5 to 7 MPa, the length
(70 bar). This range of pressure was also chosen relaxation became smaller. It was found that rice
so that the briquettes could be pressed manually husk had the smallest relaxation whereas coconut
using a hand press. Also from the literature, this ®bres relaxed the most.
range of pressure was said to represent a distinct After one week, the measured relaxed length
phase where density increase was considered lin- was used to calculate the stable or relaxed den-
ear [2]. sity of the briquette. Fig. 1 shows the relaxed
density of briquettes of various materials as a
function of die pressure. The shape of the curves
3. Results is similar to the ones obtained by Wamukonya
and Jenkins [3] although the quantitative values
3.1. Eect of die pressure on relaxation behaviour of relaxation in length are dierent, perhaps
and density because of dierent values of die pressure.
Although Osobov [4], O'Dogherty and
After the briquette was removed from the die, Wheeler [5], Faborode and O'Callaghan [6] and
Fig. 1. Relationship between relaxed density and die pressure for dierent briquettes.
O.C. Chin, K.M. Siddiqui / Biomass and Bioenergy 18 (2000) 223±228 225
Table 3
Relationship between shear strength and die pressure of briquettes
Type of biomass a n
3.5. Eect of binder on the durability of briquettes
Sawdust 2.007 ÿ0.357
Rice husk 1.270 ÿ0.315 The binders used for most biomass briquettes
Peanut shell 1.045 ÿ0.267
were molasses and starch, except for the case of
Coconut ®bre 1.095 ÿ0.270
Palm ®bre 0.991 ÿ0.291
rice husks where water was found to be a better
binding agent. Increasing the amount of binder
O.C. Chin, K.M. Siddiqui / Biomass and Bioenergy 18 (2000) 223±228 227
Table 5
Overall relaxation behaviour of biomass briquettes
(s) Sawdust Rice husk Peanut shell Coconut ®bre Palm ®bre
increased the relaxed density, durability and the 3.6. Eect of moisture content
shear strength of the briquettes.
Table 6 gives the relaxed density of briquette In these tests, the moisture content in biomass
as a function of binder content (% by weight). was varied from 5 to 30% on dry basis prior to
The shear strength generally increased with its compaction. It was found that relaxed density,
increasing ratio of the binder. However, for each D, can be expressed as a function of moisture
type of briquette, there was an optimum amount content, mw, according to the relation proposed
of binder by weight arrived at after consider- by O'Dogherty and Wheeler [5]
ations of relaxed density, relaxation behaviour
and shear strength. The optimum amounts were D a exp
ÿcmw
4
found to be where a and c are empirical constants. Table 7
lists the values of a and c.
Sawdust: 25%; Peanut shell: 10%;
Generally, briquettes with a moisture-content
Coconut fibre: 30%; Palm fibre: 10% of around 20% showed the least relaxation. This
is in agreement with the work of Smith et al. [8]
on briquetting of wheat straw.
Using these optimum quantities of the binder,
the relaxation behaviour of dierent biomass bri-
quettes was compared. It was found that the
4. Conclusions
coconut ®bre had the largest relaxation in length
followed by palm ®bre, whereas peanut shell bri-
From the experiments carried out, it was gen-
quettes had the least relaxation in length.
erally found that as die pressure, dwell time and
Fig. 3 shows the eect of binder content on binder content increased, the quality of briquettes
the combustion rate, which increases with
improved. However, this was not necessarily true
increasing binder content.
Table 7
Table 6 Relationship between moisture content and relaxed density
Relaxed density in kg/m3 of biomass briquettes with binder for various biomass briquettes
content
Type of briquettes a c
Biomass 5% 10% 20% 40%
Sawdust 415.2 0.43
Sawdust 462 446 442 447 Rice husk 608.4 1.82
Peanut shells 547 555 560 572 Peanut shell 612.1 ÿ0.24
Coconut ®bre 157 152 134 141 Coconut ®bre 200.1 1.42
Palm ®bre 192 210 214 216 Palm ®bre 349.5 1.72
228 O.C. Chin, K.M. Siddiqui / Biomass and Bioenergy 18 (2000) 223±228
of the moisture content: briquettes at intermedi- sequent work should concentrate on optimizing
ate moisture content performed better. the fabrication processes for their industrial use.
Various types of binders were tested in
order to determine the most suitable binding
agent. Starch and molasses are good binders References
because of their availability and low price. For
rice husks, water rather than molasses was [1] Kong HW. Wood and charcoal briquetting in Malaysia.
found to be a good binding agent. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on
The burning rates of briquettes increased Advances in Alternative and Renewable Energy,
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 22±24 July 1997, 1997. p.
with dwell time, as well as, binder content.
76±84.
However, the eect of moisture on the burning [2] Ferrero A, Horabik J, Molenda M. Density-pressure re-
rates of the briquettes did not follow a con- lationship in compaction of straw. Canadian Agric.
sistent behaviour. Engng 1990;33:107±11.
The dwell time aected the relaxed density [3] Wamukonya L, Jenkins B. Durability and relaxation of
or the rebound of the briquette. The relax- sawdust and wheat-straw briquettes as possible fuels for
Kenya. Biomass and Bioenergy 1995;8:175±9.
ation in length of most biomass materials [4] Osobov VI. Reaction to the pressing of ®brous plant ma-
decreased with dwell time until an optimum terials. Vestnik Selskokozyaistvennoi Nauki 1968;13:115±
value was reached. Also, as the die pressure 9.
increased, the relaxation in briquettes was [5] O'Dogherty MJ, Wheeler JA. Compression of straw to
reduced. high densities in closed cylindrical dies. J Agric Engng
Res 1984;29:61±72.
Of the ®ve biomass materials briquetted, the [6] Faborode MO, O'Callaghan JR. Theoretical analysis of
sawdust briquettes were found to have the best the compression of ®brous agricultural materials. J Agric
handling characteristics in terms of storage and Engng Res 1986;35:175±91.
lack of deterioration. [7] O'Dogherty MJ. A review of the mechanical behaviour of
straw when compressed to high densities. J Agric Engng
Generally, briquettes of biomass materials
Res 1989;44:241±65.
show a lot of promise as a potential source of [8] Smith IE, Probert SD, Stokes RE, Hansford RJ. The bri-
fuel. However, each biowaste material briquette quetting of wheat straw. J Agric Engng Res 1997;22:105±
requires dierent optimum conditions and sub- 11.