Professional Documents
Culture Documents
135]
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
JOURNAL OF INDIAN SOCIETY OF PEDODONTICS AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY | Jan - Mar 2013 | Issue 1 | Vol 31 | 17
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Thursday, January 5, 2023, IP: 185.223.250.135]
psychologically traumatic. Older children express their filling was reduced 1 mm apical to the cemento–enamel
desires for an esthetic smile to be like their peers.[2] junction and covered with IRM as protective base.
Intracoronal bleaching of discolored nonvital teeth in The teeth were placed in a test tube containing 2 ml
young people offers advantages over more conventional of fresh human blood [Figure 1g] and centrifuged at
treatment involving partial or complete coverage 3200 rpm for 20 min twice daily for 3 days [Figure
restorations. Perhaps the most important of these 1h]. The teeth was placed in incubator [Figure 1i]
advantages is conservation of tooth structure. The at 250C .
younger teeth are easier to bleach because the tooth
After artificial staining, the teeth are randomly divided
substance has relatively greater permeability. [3]
into four experimental groups of 10 teeth each and the
Intracoronal bleaching provides satisfactory results and baseline color evaluation was performed. 0.04 ml of the
it is relatively economic and visits are comparatively bleaching agent is syringed into the access cavity of
short, making the technique readily acceptable to the tooth and, in the control group, 0.04 ml of distilled
children [Table A].[4] water was syringed into the access cavity and it is
sealed with IRM and placed at 37°C in an incubator
Materials and Methods throughout the experiment.
Forty extracted human primary central incisors with The color of bleached teeth is determined at 0, 7 and 14
intact crowns were selected for the study [Figure 1c]. days.[4] The color of each tooth is evaluated using vita
The armamentarium used were airotor, files, burs, lumen shade guide [Figure 1j] under broad daylight
zinc oxide eugenol [Figure 1a], normal saline, IRM conditions. The Figure 2a shows the group 1(CP) and
[Figure 1b]. The bleaching agents used were 10% Figure 2b shows the group2 (HP) before bleaching.
hydrogen peroxide [Figure 1f], 10% carbamide The Figure 2c and 2d shows the group 3(SP) and
peroxide [Figure 1e] and 10%sodium perborate control group before bleaching. The Figure 3a shows
[Figure 1d]. Teeth were then stored in physiologic the group 1(CP) and Figure 3b shows the group2 (HP)
saline. Pulpectomy was performed and, the root canal after bleaching at the end of 14 days. The Figure 3c
a b c d
f g h
e
i j
18 JOURNAL OF INDIAN SOCIETY OF PEDODONTICS AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY | Jan - Mar 2013 | Issue 1 | Vol 31 |
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Thursday, January 5, 2023, IP: 185.223.250.135]
and 3d shows the group 3(SP) and control group after statistically significant). The comparison of group 3
14days. The data are collected, tabulated and subjected (SP) with group 1 (CP) and group 2 (HP) and control
to statistical analysis. group showed significance in relation to the control
group (mean = -6.20, P-value = 0.00) (P-value <0.05
Results is statistically significant).
The results in Table 1 showed statistical significance
in control group, group 1 (CP), group 2 (HP), group 3 The comparison of group 2 (HP) with group 1 (CP),
(SP) (mean = -8.40, P-value = 0.00) (P-value <0.05 is group 3 (SP) showed high statistical significance in
a b
a b
c d c d
Table 1: Multiple comparisons among the carbamide peroxide, sodium perborate, hydrogen peroxide and control groups after two
bleaching sessions (day14)
Group Mean difference Std. error sig. 95% confidence Interval
Lower bound Upper bound
Group1(CP) Group2(HP) 2.200 0.918 0.96 -.27 4.67
Group3 (SP) 0.000 0.918 1.000 -2.47 2.47
Control -6.200* 0.918 0.000 -8.67 -3.73
Group 2(HP) Group1 (CP) -2.200 0.918 0.96 -4.67 0.27
Group3 (SP) -2.200 0.918 0.96 -4.67 0.27
Control -8.400* 0.918 0.000 -10.87 -5.93
Group3 Group1 (CP) 0.000 0.918 1.000 -2.47 2.47
Group2 (HP) 2.200 0.918 0.096 -.27 4.67
Control -6.200* 0.918 0.000 -8.67 -3.73
Control Group1(CP) 6.200* 0.918 0.000 3.73 8.67
Group2 (HP) 8.400* 0.918 0.000 5.93 10.87
Group3(SP) 6.200* 0.918 0.000 3.73 8.67
Dependent Variable: DAY 1, *The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level
Turkey HSD
Table 2: Multiple comparisons among the carbamide peroxide, sodium perborate and hydrogen peroxide groups after two bleaching
sessions (day 14)
Group Mean difference Std. error sig. 95% confidence Interval
Lower bound Upper bound
Group1(CP) Group2(HP) 2.200* 0.794 0.026 0.23 4.17
Group3 (SP) 0.000 0.794 1.000 -1.97 1.97
Group 2(HP) Group1 (CP) -2.200 0.794 0.026 -4.17 -.23
Group3 (SP) -2.200 0.794 0.026 -4.17 -.23
Group3 (SP) Group1 (CP) 0.000 0.794 1.000 -1.97 1.97
Group2 (HP) 2.200* 0.794 0.026 0.23 4.17
Dependent Variable: DAY 14, *The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level Turkey HSD
JOURNAL OF INDIAN SOCIETY OF PEDODONTICS AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY | Jan - Mar 2013 | Issue 1 | Vol 31 | 19
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Thursday, January 5, 2023, IP: 185.223.250.135]
MEAN VALUES
8.9
MEAN VALUES
Graph 1: Comparison of bleaching efficacy of CP, HP, SP and control Graph 2: Comparison of bleaching efficacy of CP, HP and SP group
group
20 JOURNAL OF INDIAN SOCIETY OF PEDODONTICS AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY | Jan - Mar 2013 | Issue 1 | Vol 31 |
[Downloaded free from http://www.jisppd.com on Thursday, January 5, 2023, IP: 185.223.250.135]
JOURNAL OF INDIAN SOCIETY OF PEDODONTICS AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY | Jan - Mar 2013 | Issue 1 | Vol 31 | 21