Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PENGURUSAN KEWANGAN
KUMPULAN 2 : KANCIL
DISEDIAKAN OLEH :
The Shariah-compliant firm Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (F&NHB) was
founded in Malaysia and is traded on Bursa Malaysia's Main Board. The Group's
core businesses, which include the production, sale, and marketing of dairy, food,
and beverage goods, generate a yearly revenue of RM4 billion. With a long history
dating back 139 years, F&NHB is now recognised as a leading provider of
high-quality, Halal products. With 22 brands in its portfolio, F&NHB is a market
leader in a number of categories. These brands include 100PLUS, F&N Fun
Flavours, F&N SEASONS, OYOSHI, F&N Magnolia, FARMHOUSE, F&N ICE
MOUNTAIN, condensed and evaporated milk sold under the F&N, TEAPOT, Gold
Coin, Cap Junjung, IDEAL, and CARNATION brands, as well as NONA's brand of
ketupat and sauces.
The company has a mission to be a stable and sustainable food and beverage
(F&B) leader in the ASEAN region and mission to be ASEAN’s leading provider of
quality and innovative products that consumers choose and trust. The company’s
Global Values serve as a compass for their actions and describe how they behave in
our organisation, they include collaboration, creating values and caring for
stakeholders. For collaboration values, they leverage the power of inherent strengths
and diversity to create inclusive synergies and commit to team goals. Under
collaboration values, they are passionate about applying new ideas and seizing
opportunities to make a positive impact on our organisation and around the world.
For creating values, they embrace our stakeholders’ perspectives with good
intentions and right mindsets to create long-term, sustainable partnerships.
F&NHB finished acquiring the whole ownership stake in Cocoaland Holdings
Bhd in November 2022. With this acquisition, the Group will be able to expand into
more Halal food categories and address the growing demand for packaged food
items in addition to adding a number of well-known confectionery and snack brands
from Malaysia to its portfolio. F&NHB is on schedule to start the upstream fresh
milk business for the downstream production and distribution of fresh milk with the
completion of the Ladang Permai Damai transaction. F&NHB is a member of the
FTSE4Good Bursa Malaysia (F4GBM) Index thanks to its unwavering dedication to
ethical business practises in relation to environmental, social, and governance (ESG)
issues. Over 2,500 individuals work for the Group throughout its activities in
Malaysia, Brunei, Thailand, and Indochina.
2.0 - FINANCIAL PERFORMANCES ANALYSIS OF
KAWAN FOOD SDN BHD
The current ratio is a liquidity ratio that is used to calculate a company’s ability to
meet its short-term debt and obligations, or those due in a single year, using assets
available on its balance sheet. Kawan Food’s current ratio increases from 2018 to
2021 which indicates that the liquidity position was somewhat strong and it shows
the company’s ability to convert its assets into cash to pay off its short-term
liabilities.
2.1.2 - Quick ratio
The quick ratio represents the extent to which a business can pay its short-term
obligations with its most liquid assets. In other words, it measures the proportion of
a business’s current liabilities that it can meet with cash and assets that can be
readily converted to cash. The quick ratio is also known as the acid test ratio, a
reference to the fact that it’s used to measure the financial strength of a business. A
business with a negative quick ratio is considered more likely to struggle in a crisis,
whereas one with a positive quick ratio is more likely to survive. Kawan Food’s
quick ratio increases from 2018 to 2021 which measures the company’s ability to
pay off short term obligations without relying on the sale of inventories are much
stronger.
2.2 - ASSET MANAGEMENT RATIO
Days sales outstanding (DSO) is a measure of the average number of days that it
takes a company to collect payment for a sale. DSO is often determined on a
monthly, quarterly, or annual basis.To compute DSO, divide the average accounts
receivable during a given period by the total value of credit sales during the same
period, and then multiply the result by the number of days in the period being
measured. In the year 2021, the DSO of Kawan Food was 198 days which indicates
the customers, on average, are not paying the their bills on time and the credit
manager of the company should take steps to collect receivables quicker.
2.2.2 - Fixed asset turnover ratio
The fixed asset turnover ratio (FAT) is, in general, used by analysts to measure
operating performance. This efficiency ratio compares net sales (income statement)
to fixed assets (balance sheet) and measures a company's ability to generate net sales
from its fixed-asset investments, namely property, plant, and equipment (PP&E).
The ratio of Kawan Food has increased from 0.83 times to 1.02 times from 2017 to
2021 indicating that it is using its fixed assets at least as intensively and seems to
have about the right amount of fixed assets relative to its sales.
2.2.3 - Total asset turnover ratio
= Sales/Total asset
The asset turnover ratio measures the value of a company's sales or revenues relative
to the value of its assets. The asset turnover ratio can be used as an indicator of the
efficiency with which a company is using its assets to generate revenue.
The higher the asset turnover ratio, the more efficient a company is at generating
revenue from its assets. Conversely, if a company has a low asset turnover ratio, it
indicates it is not efficiently using its assets to generate sales. Therefore , in the case
of Kawan Food, the asset turnover ratio indicates that it is not generating enough
sales given its total asset from 2017 until 2018 and also from 2020 to 2021.
2.3 - DEBT MANAGEMENT RATIO
The debt ratio for a given company reveals whether or not it has loans and, if so,
how its credit financing compares to its assets. It is calculated by dividing total
liabilities by total assets, with higher debt ratios indicating higher degrees of debt
financing. Debt ratios can be used to describe the financial health of individuals,
businesses, or governments. In the case of Kawan Food Sdn Bhd, from 2017 to
2021, the debt ratio decreasing each year raises a green flag and this will not make it
relatively costly for the company to borrow additional funds without first raising
more equity more. Creditors will not be reluctant to lend the company more money.
2.3.2- TIE
Interest
0 0 1,024 659 658
Expenses
Times interest earned ratio measures a company's ability to continue to service its
debt. It is an indicator to tell if a company is running into financial trouble. A high
ratio means that a company is able to meet its interest obligations because earnings
are significantly greater than annual interest obligations. Times-interest-earned ratio
for Kawan Food Bhd indicates that the company will not face difficulties if it
attempted to borrow additional money because the interest covered for each year
keeps increasing.
2.4 - PROFITABILITY RATIO
= EBIT / Sales
The operating margin measures how much profit a company makes on a dollar of
sales after paying for variable costs of production, such as wages and raw materials,
but before paying interest or tax. It is calculated by dividing a company’s operating
income by its net sales. The operating margin of Kawan Food Bhd decreases from
2017 to 2019 which indicates that the company’s operating costs are too high and it
increases from 2020 till 2021 which illustrates the company is getting better and
efficient in its operations and is good at turning sales into profits.Thus, in the year
2021, for every RM100 sales, the company is making RM14.56 EBIT.
2.4.2 - Profit Margin
Profit margin is one of the commonly used profitability ratios to gauge the degree
to which a company or a business activity makes money. It represents what
percentage of sales has turned into profits. In the year 2017,for every RM100, the
company was making RM14.83 profit. The profit of the company slightly decreases
until 2019 due to heavy use of debt. This might be also due to the company’s high
operating costs. In the year 2020, the profit margin again increased, for every
RM100 , the company was making RM12.62 profit.
2.4.3 - Basic earning Power
The Basic Earning Power Ratio (BEP) is a measure of the company’s efficiency at
producing earnings relative to its assets. The basic earning power ratio formula is
simple and takes Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) and divides it by Total
Assets. The BEP ratio can demonstrate the business’s ability to generate adequate
profits over the long term by reviewing several years to assess the company’s
efficiency and earning trends. Simply put, BEP is a quick health check on the
company’s profitability. In the year 2017, for every RM100 asset, the EBIT of
Kawan Food Sdn Bhd is RM11.04 but it drops until the year 2019 because of its low
turnover ratios and poor profit margin on sales. Eventually, in the year 2021, for
every RM100 asset, the EBIT of Kawan Food Sdn Bhd increased to RM9.53.
2.4.4 - Return on Assets (ROA)
Total
326,602 340,105 341,682 360,623 384,733
Assets
The asset turnover ratio measures the efficiency of a company's assets in generating
revenue or sales. It compares the dollar amount of sales (revenues) to its total assets
as an annualized percentage. Thus, to calculate the asset turnover ratio, divide net
sales or revenue by the average total assets. From 2017 to 2020, asset turnover ratio
of Kawan Food Sdn Bhd indicates that the company is not using its assets efficiently
and may have internal problems because it decreases. In the year 2021, its ratio
increases a little, for every RM100 assets, the return on the assets was RM8.26.
2.4.5 - Return on Equity (ROE)
2.5.1- P/E
Earnings per
8.10 6.34 3.36 7.79 8.84
share
The price-to-earnings ratio is the ratio for valuing a company that measures its
current share price relative to its earnings per share (EPS). The price-to-earnings
ratio is also sometimes known as the price multiple or the earnings multiple.P/E
ratios are used by investors and analysts to determine the relative value of a
company's shares in an apples-to-apples comparison. It can also be used to compare
a company against its own historical record or to compare aggregate markets against
one another or over time. The P/E ratio of Kawan Food was relatively high in the
year 2019 with strong growth prospects and little risk.
2.5.2 - M/B
Market
2.94 1.91 1.39 2.08 1.64
Price
Book value
103,039 163,682 227,220 160,993 217,670
per share
The book-to-market ratio compares a company's book value to its market value. The
book value is the value of assets minus the value of the liabilities. The market value
of a company is the market price of one of its shares multiplied by the number of
shares outstanding. The book-to-market ratio is a useful indicator for investors who
need to assess the value of a company. The M/B ratios of Kawan Food typically
exceeded 1.0 which means that investors are willing to pay more for stocks than the
accounting book values of the stocks.
3.0 - FINANCIAL PERFORMANCES ANALYSIS OF
F&N SDN BHD
Current assets of the company are higher compared to the current liabilities thus the
current ratio is more than 1 and it increases every year from 2018 to 2022. It is a
desirable situation to be in since it shows that the company is highly capable of
repaying its short term due loan within one year due. The primary reason for this
increase is built-up of cash and cash equivalents and other assets from 2019 to 2022.
From 2018 to 2022, the quick ratio has increased from 1.3x to 3.9x which means the
company proportion of a business's current liabilities that can meet with cash and
assets that can be readily converted to cash are high. A quick ratio that is too high
could mean that a business is sitting on too much cash and not investing or growing
enough but giving the company cash lower in 2022 compared to 2018. This also
shows that the company could pay off its current liabilities without selling any
long-term assets
The inventory turnover ratio calculates how frequently inventory is bought and sold
over the course of the complete fiscal year. This ratio is crucial for the business and
the investors because it shows how well the company converts inventory purchases
into final sales. From the decreasing ratio from 2018 to 2022, it shows that the
company holds too much inventory even though the sales is higher. Faster product
sales result in more efficient inventory management. It is therefore necessary to have
a proper plan in place for increasing inventory turnover ratio by focusing on
improved sales or reducing the blockage of cash on a stock.
The DSO of the company had increased for the previous 5 years. The economic
condition due to the pandemic might be the factor that their creditors are taking more
times to pay their debt. A high DSO signifies that the company is taking longer to
collect payments from creditors, whereas a low DSO demonstrates frequent and
prompt payment collection. DSO can be utilised to some extent to evaluate the
creditworthiness of the creditors; for example, if the creditor delays the collection,
one could infer that they are under financial hardship. This consequently affects the
company's cash flow. A DSO of more than 45 days is regarded as high in a typical
circumstance.
The total fixed asset turnover is getting lower each year means the efficiency the
company uses its resources overall is decreasing. The fixed asset turnover ratio
measures the company’s efficiency in utilizing fixed assets to generate revenue. If
the ratio in 2018 is 2.35 , it indicates that the company utilizes its fixed assets
efficiently. The return on capital would likely be higher in such cases, and it is taken
positively by the investors and lenders. Meanwhile in year 2022 the ratio is 2.00. Not
much difference so it is safe to say that the fixed assets are well utilised. It may have
made a significant investment if the ratio is excessively high or low. It might be in
the process of acquiring new assets, an expansion is already under way, or full
capacity is not yet operational.
Because the denominator in the equation is larger while the numerator remains the
same, a company's asset turnover ratio will be lower than its fixed asset turnover
ratio. Conceptually speaking, it also makes sense that the difference between sales
and total assets is greater than the difference between sales and a subset of assets.
Because they want to have the best understanding of the performance of their capital
investments, manufacturing companies frequently prefer the fixed asset turnover
ratio over the asset turnover ratio. Companies with fewer fixed assets, like retailers,
might be less concerned with the fixed assest turnover ratio than they are with the
utilization of other assets like inventory.
From year 2018 to 2022, it shows that debt ratio under control. If the ratio greater
than 1 then considerable amount of company asset are funded by debt which mean
the company has more liabilites than asset. Year 2021 is the most good year of the
company’s debt management by 0.22% and from the year 2018 which s 0.31% it has
gotten better. However, the ratio has increased again to 0.29% on the year 2022.
Overall, the company ratio below than 1 that a greater portion of company asset is
funded by equity.
The company that has a times interest earned ratio greater than 2.5 is considered an
acceptable risk.meanwhile if a company less than 2.5 are considered a much higher
risk for bankruptcy or default. For year 2018, the company has to pay RM27.15 for
each tax paid. For year 2019, the company has to pay RM117.00 for each tax paid.
For year 2020, the company has to pay RM107.64 for each tax paid. For year 2020,
the company has to pay RM150.81 for each tax paid. For year 2022, the company
has to pay RM78.24 for each tax paid.
From 2018 until 2022 there is slightly got some changes. Operating ratio shows how
efficient a company management is at keeping cost low while generating revenue or
sales. the smaller the ratio, the more efficient the company is at generating revenue
vs expenses. In year 2018, for every RM100 sales, the company is making RM10.92
EBIT. In year 2019, for every RM100 sales, the company is making RM13.07 EBIT.
In year 2020, for every RM100 sales, the company is making RM13.11 EBIT.
In year 2021, for every RM100 sales, the company is making RM11.61 EBIT. In
year 2022 for every RM100 sales, the company is making RM10.16 EBIT.
Net profit margin is typically expressed as a percentage but also can be presented in
decimal form. it just illustrates how much money in revenue collected by a company
convert into profit. . In year 2018, for every RM100 sales, the company is making
RM35.70 profit. In year 2019, for every RM100 sales, the company is making
RM31.07 profit. In year 2020, for every RM100 sales, the company is making
RM30.85 profit. In year 2021, for every RM100 sales, the company is making
RM28.91 profit. In year 2022 for every RM100 sales, the company is making
RM26.27 profit.
It is normally refers to a financial ratio that indicates how profitable a company is in
relation to total assets. most of expert use ROA to determine on how efficiently a
company uses its asset to generate profit. a higher ROA means the company more
productive and efficient to generate more profit while lower ROA indicates that
some part need improvement. In year 2018, for every RM100 asset, the company is
making RM41.00 return. In year 2019, for every RM100 asset, the company is
making RM36.00 profit. In year 2020, for every RM100 asset, the company is
making RM35.00 profit. In year 2021, for every RM100 asset, the company is
making RM33.00 profit. In year 2022 for every RM100 asset, the company is
making RM28.00 profit.
This is a measure of financial performance calculated by dividing net income by the
shareholde equity. The higher the ROE, the more efficient it company management
generating growth and income. ROE vary based on industry or sector in which
company operates. In year 2018, for every RM100 equity, the company is making
RM60.00 net profit. In year 2019, for every RM100 equity, the company is making
RM50.00 net profit. In year 2020, for every RM100 equity, the company is making
RM46.00 net profit. In year 2021, for every RM100 equity, the company is making
RM42.00 net profit. In year 2022 for every RM100 equity, the company is making
RM39.00 net profit.
Another ultitude investment ratios that you got as an investor. The earning power is
just one of multitude investment ratios that you got .Evaluating a company financial
health and stock profit potential. The BEP can demonstrate the business ability to
generate adequate profit over the long term by reviewing the company earning
trends. In year 2018, for every RM100 asset, the company got EBIT RM 12.64. In
year 2019, for every RM100 asset, the company got EBIT RM 15.21. In year 2020,
for every RM100 asset, the company got EBIT RM 14.86. In year 2021, for every
RM100 asset, the company got EBIT RM 13.20. In year 2022 for every RM100
asset the company got EBIT RM 10.83. BEP getting better between year 2018 until
2020 and drop from 2021 until 2022.
Used by the investor and analyst to determine the relative value of comapny share.
A higher ratio mean that a company stock overvalued or investor expect. The P/E
can be benchmarked against other stock in same industry or against the broader
market. For the year 2018, investor paid RM 0.33 for every RM 1 earning. For the
year 2019, investor paid RM 0.30 for every RM 1 earning. For the year 2020,
investor paid RM 0.30 for every RM 1 earning. For the year 2021, investor paid RM
0.27 for every RM 1 earning. For the year 2022, investor paid RM 0.21 for every
RM 1 earning. The P/E score decrease every year starting from year 2020.
It has been used to measure market valuation of a company relative to its book
value. the market value of a equity is typically higher than the book value of a
company stock. the price to book ratio is used by value investor to identify potential
investment. For the year 2018, investor paid RM 0.01 for every RM 1 book equity.
For the year 2019, investor paid RM 0.05 for every RM 1 book equity. For the year
2020, investor paid RM 0.04 for every RM 1 book equity. For the year 2021,
investor paid RM 0.04 for every RM 1 book equity. For the year 2022, investor paid
RM 0.06 for every RM 1 book equity. The M/B score increase every year starting
from year 2020.
4.0 - BENCHMARK / PEER ANALYSIS BETWEEN
F&N SDN BHD AND KAWAN FOOD SDN BHD
A healthy current ratio is normally between 1.5 and 2, but it occasionally depends on
the sector of the economy in which the business operates. The company can meet its
short-term obligations if the current ratio is strong, or anyplace above 1. They are
better equipped to pay off debts if the ratio is larger. Hence, from this statement it is
shown that KAWAN FOOD BERHAD has a better and strong ability to pay off their
debts to the creditor. Although the current ratio of F&N increases from year 2018 to
2022, it’s ratio are far left behind by KAWAN FOOD BERHAD. KAWAN FOOD
BERHAD has been making tremendous strong ability through the past years to meet
it’s obligations to pay off it’s debt.
Based on the analysis among Account receivable and Daily average sales , we can
conclude that both companies having same analyze report..A high DSO number
suggests that a company is experiencing delays in receiving payments, which can
result in a cash flow problem .A low DSO indicates that the company is getting its
payments quickly. That money can be put back into the business to good effect.
Bases on the analysis on DSO we can conclude that for company Fraser & Neave
Holdings Bhd (F&N) have improving on the collection starting from year 2019 to
2021 as the the company getting its payment within 54days on 2019 compared to
2018 it delays to 57 days and on 2021 the collection period reduce more into 45days
but unfortunately the collection get delayed to 71days on 2022. Furthermore , the
company Kawan Food Berhad face the same issue as on 2018 the collection period
is about 162days way more better than 2017 about 165days to get the payments and
on 2019 and 2020 the collection period reduce more to 151days to 150 days but at
last the payment get delayed again on 2021 about to 198days.
Based on the analysis of sales over net fixed assets , we can conclude that Kawan
Food Berhad company’s efficiency in utilizing fixed assets to generate revenue
greater than Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N) . For the company Fraser &
Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N) in 2018 the ratio about 2.35times which the company
utilizes its fixed assets efficiently but from the year 2019 to 2020 the use of fixed
assets decrease siginificantly from 2.32times to 2.29 times and they utilized it back
on 2021 about 2.34 times and its flops on 2022 about 2.0 times. Meanwhile for
company Kawan Food Berhad they utilize its fixed assets thoroughly about
0.83times to 1.02 times from 2017-2021 . A higher turnover ratio is indicative of
greater efficiency in managing fixed-asset investments, but there is not an exact
number or range that dictates whether a company has been efficient at generating
revenue from such investments
4.2.3 Total Asset Turnover
Based on the analysis on sales over total assets , we can conclude that Fraser &
Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N) efficiently using its assets to generate revenue
compared to Kawan Food Berhad. It clearly shows in the analysis of total turnover
ratio of Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N) about 1.16 times on year 2018 and
2019 the turnover of assets to generate revenues but the turnover decrease
significantly about 1.13 times to 0.99 times on year 2020 and 2021.Meanwhile , the
ratio surprisingly increased about 1.23 times on 2022 which shows their concerned
with assets to generate revenues whereas Kawan Food Berhad, the asset turnover
ratio indicates that it is not generating enough sales given its total asset from 2017
until 2018 about 0.60times decreased to 0.59 times and also from 2020 to 2021
decreased drastically about 0.71times to 0.65times. Conversely, if a company has a
low asset turnover ratio, it indicates it is not efficiently using its assets to generate
sales.
4.3 - DEBT MANAGEMENT RATIO
Simply from the results of total debt and total assets , we can try to conclude that
Kawan Food Berhad performed much better than Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd
(F&N) . It is because Kawan Food Berhad company has less reliance on debt for
asset formation and is less risky compared to Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N) .
Also, from the analysis we can conclude that F&N company assets are funded by
debt which means the company has more liabilities than assets. Consequently, if we
look at the current ratio for both companies, it turns out that Kawan Food Berhad`s
debt management is better than F&N. By data analysis , F&N company in the year
2021 is the best year of the company’s debt management by 0.22% and from the
year 2018 which is 0.31% it has gotten better. However, the ratio has increased again
to 0.29% on the year 2022 which clearly shows the poor management of debt and
they have more liabilities than asset whereas Kawan Food Berhad from 2017 to
2021, the debt ratio decreasing each year from 5.45% in 2017 to 4.09% in 2021
raises a green flag and this will not make it relatively costly for the company to
borrow additional funds without first raising more equity . The management team at
Kawan Food Berhad was more effective at managing their debt with sufficient
funds. The strategies adopted by Kawan Food Berhad were much more successful
than those of F&N, and it is Kawan Food Berhad which can make a good reputation
to creditors for more business.
4.3.2 - Times Interest Earned
Based on the analysis of Earning Before Interest Taxes and Interest expenses , we
can try to conclude that Kawan Food Berhad company`s performance much better
than Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N). It is because Kawan Food Berhad
company is able to meet its interest obligations because earnings are significantly
greater than annual interest compared to Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N) .
Also, the from the analysis we can conclude that F&N company`s ability to continue
to service its debt greater than Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N). Furthermore if
we scrutinize at the times interest earned for both companies, it clearly shows that
Kawan Food Berhad has an undesirably low level of leverage compared to Fraser &
Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N). Kawan Food Berhad on 2017-2018 have no any
interest expenses but surprisingly from year 2019 to 2021 the ratio increased
drastically from 14.99 times to 55.70 times interest charges with its pretax
earnings.This indicates that Kawan Food Berhad will not face difficulties if it
attempted to borrow additional money because of the drastic increase on yearly
interest. The Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N) company considered an
acceptable because the data shows on 2018-2022 increased 27.15 times to 150.81
times interest charges from its earnings but unfortunately the ratio flop until 78.24
times in 2022 this can clearly advise the lower times interest earned ratio means
fewer earnings are available to meet interest payments
4.4 - PROFITABILITY RATIO
The net profit ratio indicates how much net income a company makes with total
sales achieved. To compare between the both companies, it is shown that F&N has a
higher net profit ratio compare to KAWAN FOOD BERHAD. The highest ratio for
KAWAN FOOD BERHAD is during year 2017-14.83 % meanwhile the highest for
F&NBH is during the year 2018 – 35.70%. A corporation is more effective at
converting sales into actual profit if its net profit margin is higher thus making
F&NB is more performing in it’s selling point. The success of a corporation in
making a profit on each ringgit of sales is measured by its net ratio. All elements that
affect profitability, whether or not they are managed by management, are included in
net ratio. A corporation is more adept at controlling costs the higher the ratio.
4.4.3 - BEP ratio
The purpose of BEP is to determine how effectively a firm uses its assets to generate
income. The BEP ratio is simply EBIT divided by total assets . The higher the BEP
ratio, the more effective a company is at generating income from its assets. From
both companies calculation of basic earning power, it is known that F&N has a
higher BEP ratio compared to KAWAN FOOD BERHAD. However, the trend shows
that for F&N BEP ratio increases during 2018 to 2019 from 12.64% to 15.21% but
slowly decreasing from year 2020 to 2022 For KAWAN FOOD BERHAD, the ratio
has been decreasing from 2017 to 2019, 11.04 % to 4.5 % but increases during the
year 2020 and 2021 from 8.8% to 9.53%. The increases are maybe due to the results
from the increased profit on operating activities, This shows that assets profitability
of the F&N has a greater assets profitability of the assets.
4.4.4 - ROA
ROA for the year 2018 of F&N is 41 % and KAWAN FOOD BERHAD for 2017 is
11.04 %. Year 2019 F&N is 36% and 2018 KAWAN FOOD BERHAD is 8.6 %.
Year 2020 ROA is 35 % meanwhile KAWAN FOOD BERHAD for 2019 is 4.5%.
2021 ROA for F&N is 33 % and ROA for KAWAN FOOD BERHAD 2020 is
7.67%. For the year of 2022 ROA F&N is 28 % and ROA 2021 for KAWAN FOOD
BERHAD is 8.26%. It shows that the ROA for F&N business decrease year by year
compare to KAWAN FOOD BERHAD. ROA FOR KAWAN FOOD BERHAD start
to decrease from the year 2017 until 2019 and start to increase back from year 2020
until 2021. Its show that the company more productive and efficient to generate
more profit.
4.4.5 - ROE
The higher the ROE the more efficient company management generate growth and
income. ROE for the year 2018 of F&N is 60 % and KAWAN FOOD BERHAD for
2017 is 15.18 %. Year 2019 F&N is 50% and 2018 KAWAN FOOD BERHAD is 7.3
%. Year 2020 ROE is 46 % meanwhile KAWAN FOOD BERHAD for 2019 is 3.8
%. 2021 ROE for F&N is 42 % and ROE for KAWAN FOOD BERHAD 2020 is
8.26 %. For the year of 2022 ROE F&N is 39 % and ROE 2021 for KAWAN FOOD
BERHAD is 8.9 %. It shows that the ROE for both F&N and KAWAN FOOD
BERHAD business decrease year by year from 2017 until 2022. Company not
making much profit during the years perhaps because of management not efficient or
got some supplier issues or etc.
4.5.1 - P/E
Based on the analysis among stock price and earning per share, we can conclude that
both companies having same analyze report . A high P/E ratio could mean that a
company's stock is overvalued, or that investors are expecting high growth rates in
the future. As we can see from the price-to earning ratio , we can look that for
company Kawan Food Berhad based on stock valued on 2017 about 0.36 times
earning per share but the turnover dropped on 2018 and peak again on 2019 about
0.41times but unfortunately the stock value dropped drastically from 0.27times to
0.19times in the year 2020 to 2021. Meanwhile ,Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd
(F&N) , For the year 2018, investor paid RM 0.33 for every RM 1 earning. For the
year 2019, investor paid RM 0.30 for every RM 1 earning. For the year 2020,
investor paid RM 0.30 for every RM 1 earning. For the year 2021, investor paid RM
0.27 for every RM 1 earning. For the year 2022, investor paid RM 0.21 for every
RM 1 earning. The P/E score decrease every year starting from year 2020.
4.5.2 - M/B
The price-to-book (P/B) ratio measures the market's valuation of a company relative
to its book value.The market value of equity is typically higher than the book value
of a company's stock.Based on the analysis among market price per share over book
value per share we can conclude that Fraser & Neave Holdings Bhd (F&N)
considered having solid investments by value investors compared to Kawan Food
Berhad . It clearly shows in the analysis for F&N on year for the year 2018, investor
paid RM 0.01 for every RM 1 book equity. For the year 2019, investor paid RM 0.05
for every RM 1 book equity. For the year 2020, investor paid RM 0.04 for every RM
1 book equity. For the year 2021, investor paid RM 0.04 for every RM 1 book
equity. For the year 2022, investor paid RM 0.06 for every RM 1 book equity. The
M/B score increase every year starting from year 2020. Meanwhile the Kawan Food
Berhad P/B ratios more than 1.0 are typically considered not a solid investments by
value investors.
LAMPIRAN
KAWAN Food Berhad 640445-V Annual Report 2017 21
Issued and Paid-up Share Capital 60,000 91,175 104,839 134,820 179,760
Share Premium – – 11,751 37,535 –
Non-Distributable Reserve 3,337 5,318 13,906 14,984 9,984
Retained Earnings 72,502 57,932 86,310 104,095 119,056
Financial Ratio
The Group’s revenue increased by 5% to RM196.3 million in FY2017. The increase in revenue was largely attributed
to higher sales orders from our major customers in Malaysia, France and Middle East.
In term of revenue contribution by geographical segments, Malaysia remains the largest market for Kawan,
generating 38.9% of the Group turnover, followed by North America (29.9%) and Asia (17.5%).
The Group’s profit before tax (“PBT”) in FY2017 dropped by 13.2% to RM36.1 million. The decrease in PBT was
mainly attributed to higher input costs and higher foreign currency exchange losses incurred in FY2017. In FY2017,
Kawan incurred foreign currency losses of RM2.6 million whereas in FY2016, Kawan recorded foreign currency gains
of RM1.9 million.
Capital Expenditure
During the year under review, the Group incurred capital expenditures amounting to RM32.0 million on acquisition
of property, plant and equipment for the Pulau Indah expansion project. This was funded through internally
generated funds.
Dividend
In FY2017, the Company declared and paid an interim single tier dividend of 2.5 sen per ordinary share amounting
to RM6.7 million.
On 1 March 2018, the Company declared an interim single tier dividend of 2.5 sen per ordinary share amounting to
RM9.0 million in respect of the financial year ending 31 December 2018. The dividend was paid on 30 March 2018.
Management Discussion
and Analysis (continued)
Issued and Paid-up Share Capital 91,175 104,839 134,820 179,760 179,760
Share Premium - 11,751 37,535 - -
Non-Distributable Reserve 5,318 13,906 14,984 9,985 8,831
Retained Earnings 57,932 86,310 104,094 119,055 132,874
Financial Ratio
The Group PBT in FY18 dropped 18.9% to RM29.2m. The In FY18, the Company declared and paid an interim single
decrease in PBT was mainly attributed to start-up costs and tier dividend of 2.5 sen per ordinary share amounting to
unfavourable exchange rate. RM8.99m.
FINANCIAL RATIOS
The Group revenue increased by 7.1% to RM214.1 million in FY2019. The increase in revenue was largely attributed
to higher sales orders from our customers in export markets.
In term of revenue contribution by geographical segments, Malaysia remained the largest market for Kawan, generating
39.4% of the Group turnover, followed by North America (25.6%) and Asia (20.9%).
The Group PBT in FY2019 dropped by 47.5% to RM15.4 million. The decrease in PBT was mainly attributed to higher
operating costs such as depreciation and labour costs.
KAWAN FOOD BERHAD • ANNUAL REPORT 2020
19
KAWAN FOOD BERHAD • ANNUAL REPORT 2020
FINANCIAL RATIOS
Capital Expenditure
During the year under review, the Group incurred capital expenditure amounting to RM18.3 million, which was focused
on infrastructure and equipment for our Pulau Indah manufacturing facilities. The amount was financed through
internally generated funds.
Dividend
An interim single tier dividend of 2.5 sen per ordinary share amounting to RM8.99 million was paid during the year
under review. Additionally, the Group had on 22 February 2021, declared an interim single-tier dividend of 3.0 sen per
ordinary share amounting to RM10.8 million in respect of the FY2021, which was paid on 30 March 2021.
20
Management Discussion and Analysis
(cont’d)
FINANCIAL RATIOS
Capital Expenditure
During the year under review, the Group incurred capital expenditure amounting to
RM10.9 million, which was utilised mainly on infrastructure and equipment upgrades
for our PI manufacturing facilities to achieve further operational and cost efficiencies.
The amount was financed through internally generated funds.
Invested
We look forward to continue investing in digitalisation initiatives with an emphasis on RM10.9 mil
technology and process improvements, embracing the IR 4.0 trend to empower greater in IR 4.0 upgrades
growth through innovation.
Dividend
An interim single tier dividend of 3.0 sen per ordinary share amounting to RM10.8 million for FY2021 was paid during
the financial year under review. Additionally, Kawan had on 1 March 2022, declared an interim single-tier dividend of
3.0 sen per ordinary share amounting to RM10.8 million in respect of the FY2022, which was paid on 30 March 2022.
and Highlights
REVENUE Year ended 30 September 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 NET DIVIDEND PER SHARE
(RM million) (sen)
FY20 522.9 Dividend - net (sen) 57.5 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 (ii) FY20 3,520.1
FY21 479.4 Dividend - cover (times) 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 FY21 3,631.7 84
EBITDA Share capital 816.8 816.8 816.8 816.8 816.8 SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(RM million) (RM million)
Shareholders’ equity 2,305.4 (i)
2,529.3 2,690.6 2,819.0 2,982.5
FY18 515.6 (i)
FY18 2,305.4 (i)
4
FY20 655.3 FY20 2,690.6
Share capital (number of shares) 366.8 366.8 366.8 366.8 366.8
8
FY19 410.2 Debt to equity ratio 14.6 4.9 4.3 2.3 10.4 FY19 6.90
9
Net debt to equity ratio - - - - -
FY20 410.1 FY20 7.34
of Financial Position
TOTAL ASSETS TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
REVENUE – BY OPERATING SEGMENTS
FY2022 FY2021 FY2022 FY2021
F&B Malaysia F&B Thailand Property Others
11% 15% 5% 5%
2% 2%
17% 15% 54% 46%
22%
FY2022
1 18%
FY2021
3
70%
21% 15%
Management Discussion & Analysis
FY2022
3%
35%
93% 3% 3% 1%
FY2021
4
5 OPERATING PROFIT – BY OPERATING SEGMENTS
FY2022
8 Investment in an associate
Investment in a joint venture
9
Trade and other receivables
Inventories
Cash and cash equivalents 21% 78% 1%
FY2021
Fraser
& Neave
Notes:
(i) Comprise deferred tax assets, current tax assets and derivative financial assets. Holdings
(ii) Comprise lease liabilities, employee benefits, deferred tax liabilities, current tax liabilities and derivative financial liabilities. Bhd
Annual
FY22 220.1 FY2022: 4,470.2 FY2022: 447.9 FY2022: 454.1 FY2022: 382.3 FY2022: 104.5
2,422.7
Malaysia
1,137.7
1,118.2
FY21 220.1
1,107.7
1,106.6
1
COST OF SALES
2 FY22
(RM million)
3 4,470.2
FY22 3,296.1
Management Discussion & Analysis
FY21 2,936.7
2,047.5
Thailand EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EXPENSES
(RM million)
119.6
109.5
114.4
119.4
112.0
108.1
107.2
98.0
97.5
111.8
93.9
92.9
88
26.6
27.0
25.6
25.4
FY22 294.1
89
FY21 289.7 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2,136.5
Malaysia
RM million Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 FY2022
RM816.8
million
40
100
1
17 JANUARY 2022 No. of
60th Annual General Meeting 35
Shareholders
2
3 30 80
21 JANUARY 2022 7,732
8 FEBRUARY 2022
Date of entitlement of the final
Quarterly announcement on
Management Discussion & Analysis
FRASER & NEAVE HOLDINGS BHD’S SHARE PRICE AND FTSE BURSA MALAYSIA KLCI INDEX (“FBM KLCI INDEX”) FRASER & NEAVE HOLDINGS BHD’S SHARE PRICE AND VOLUME TRADED
14,000,000 40
130
120
1
2 110
12,000,000
35
3 100
90
Management Discussion & Analysis
30
10,000,000
80
70
25
60 92
8,000,000
93
50
20
40
6,000,000
30
15
20
4
10
4,000,000
0 10
5
-10
6
2,000,000
-20 5
7
-30
8
-40
0 0
9
30/09/18 30/09/19 30/09/20 30/09/21 30/09/22
30/09/18 30/09/19 30/09/20 30/09/21 30/09/22
Fraser
& Neave
FBM KLCI index (%) F&N share price (%) F&N volume traded F&N share price (RM)
Holdings
Bhd