Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gender History
Human understandings of sexual difference—the many and various ways that the existence
of male and female is figured in social relationships, beliefs, practices, and institutions—this is
gender. Being products of human culture, notions of gender are not constant but are specific
to time and place. That means gender is inherently historical. Gender definition is always
present, yet never static. Even within a given time and place, the categories of masculinity and
femininity are in a process of being forged, disseminated, contested, reworked, and reaffirmed.
Therefore, representations and enactments of gender attributes and proprieties will appear in
every arena in which women and men live and interpret their lives.
Some historians (and non-historians) think "gender history" is a synonym for women's
history; others, however, feel that speaking of gender history minimizes or dismisses women's
history. Gender history expresses the main intent of the field of women's history since it
began, that is, to show that understanding of the past cannot be gained without paying
attention to women and men as such, to systematic differentiation of womanhood and
manhood, masculinity, and femininity.
That was not a simple endeavor. It involved changing—broadening—what had been seen as
"history," what had been seen as historically important. It involved revising typical periodization
and reassessing assumptions about causation in history. Focusing on women's lives and
experiences involved revisualizing what was subject to history.
Society
A society, or a human society, is a group of people involved with each other through
persistent relations, or a large social grouping.
Elements in a society:
1. sharing the same geographical or social territory,
2. typically, subject to the same political authority and dominant cultural expectations.
Dr. Eugene Becklard was a French Physiologist who published guides for single and newly
married people that were intended to eradicate confusion and complications in conception and
other ailments that plagued Victorian youth. In a stark contrast to Terhune's writings, Dr.
Becklard employs a hefty dose of pseudo-science to explain various aspects of reproductive
biology and the human body. In his book, The Marriage Guide, he states that conception cannot
occur in feelings of horror or disgust. Hence, no woman ever became pregnant from a rape
committed on her against her inclination." Even more striking than his medical revelations are
his ideals regarding women. Dr. Becklard says, in short, that the goal of every woman's life is
to be married. His opinion is very much a reflection of popular opinion and likely resonated
strongly with contemporary readers.
In pre-colonial times, among many ethnic groups, custom law gave women equal rights
with men. They could own and inherit property, engage in trade and industry, and succeed to
chieftainship in the absence of a male heir. They had exclusive right to educate and to name
their children. They were also the money keepers. During the Spanish times, a woman
continued the use of her maiden’s name after marriage, or else merely appended her husband's
surname to her own, and the children assumed the hyphenated surname. Her husband may
have built their house, the symbol of their conjugal state, but she was the maybahay, literally
the owner of the house.
Prior to the coming of the Spanish colonies Filipino women had the same social status as
the men. They can own property, divorce their husbands, be ritual leaders or Babylon’s and
even new rulers in place of men. These women even wrote poetry in banana leaves. They were
an empowered lot. But when the Spaniards came, they started a tradition of subordinating
woman. Nevertheless, Filipino Woman were given education during the Spanish period due the
introduction of the Education Decree of 1863 by Isabella the II which mandated the
establishment of at least two free primary schools, one for boys and one for girls, in each town
under the responsibility of the municipal government. Leonor Florentino, the mother of
Philippines Woman’s literature, was a product of this public education. Her poems which were
recognized in Europe was written in both Spanish and Ilocano. During the final moments of the
19th century, a group of women who were known as the “21 woman from Malolos, Bulacan”
fought for the eradication of discriminatory laws especially pertaining to education including
the learning of the Spanish language.
There are many women who deserve recognition for their roles during the Philippine
Revolution of 1896. Some of the notable ones are Teodora Alonzo, the mother of Dr. Jose Rizal,
was the one who taught him all the noble principles he fought for. Melchora Aquino, also
known as Tandang Sora is recognized as the mother of the Katipunan because she took care of
the ailing Katipuneros. She was exiled by the Spaniards to the Marianas Islands because of this.
Gregoria De Jesus, the wife of Andres Bonifacio, is known as the mother of the Philippines
revolution. She played a large role in the growth of Katipunan and served as the custodian of all
the weapons and belongings of the Katipunan. Aguila Esteban, assisted the Katipunans by being
the one who traveled to Manila to procure copper, lead and other materials needed in making
gunpowder and bullets. Hilario Del Rosario-Aguinaldo, the first wife of Emilio Aguinaldo,
organized the daughters of the revolution, which later became the National Association of the
Red Cross. Gliceria Marella Villavicencio was named by Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo as the Matriarch-
General of the Revolutionary Forces in recognition for her services to the Philippine Revolution.
Marcela Agoncillo made the first Filipino Flag. Aguida Kahabagan was the only Woman general
in the Philippine Revolution who fought in the battle fields against the Spaniards. Teresa
Magawa, the first woman General in the Visayas led the troops in the battle of Bario Yoting,
Capiz in early 1898.
Filipino women have played a big role in the shaping of our country. They not only served as
mothers, sisters, and wives but they also played an active role during the Philippines
Revolution. They showed bravery, perseverance, and love of country not only in the privacy of
their home but in the battlefields as well.
In general, Filipino women find pride in their work. They do not find themselves alienated
from their chores because they work with, around, and for their families. This family-oriented
mindset gives them a sense of dignity and responsibility. The family and the children are the
primary priority some Filipino women's life.
In addition to doing housework, the contemporary role of a Filipino wife today is to provide
financial support in the household by seeking employment in higher-earning occupations which
then expands the Filipino female work outside the household.
In the early 1900s, the female workforce in the Philippines was also a highly debated topic
during workers’ conferences. In 1910, during the first Congress of Labor, the decision to enact
a law that would regulate the employment of women and children was approved due to poor
working conditions (“dark and ill-ventilated rooms, smoke-filled factories”, etc.) for women and
children. Then, in March 1923, “An Act to Regulate the Employment of Women and Children
in Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Establishments and Other Workplaces” was passed to
oversee the welfare of women and children. In 1960, under the Department of Labor, the
Bureau of Women and Minors was created and was responsible for the promotion,
development, and the protection of the welfare of working women and minors. Since then,
more acts were made to oversee the welfare of women workers, as seen in both the 1935 and
1973 constitutions.
The number of women who engage in politics are smaller compared to their male
counterparts. This was primarily because engagement in politics is considered "dirty."
Participation of Filipino women in Philippine politics was encouraged during the Beijing
Declaration in 1995 at the United Nations' Fourth World Conference on Women. In February
2005, however, a United Nations review on the progress of Philippine women and their role in
politics revealed that despite "an increase in the quality of female politicians, there was not
enough increase in" the number of women participants in government activities. From 1992 to
2001, Filipino women had been elected as local chief executives, functioning as mayors,
governors, and captains of villages. One influential factor contributing to the increasing
number of female politicians, is the elevation of Corazon Aquino and Gloria Macapagal-
Arroyo as Philippine women Presidents.
The Philippines has been noted as having one of the smallest gender disparities in the
world. The gender gap has been closed in both health and education; the country has had two
female presidents (Corazon Aquino from 1986-1992 and Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo from 2001-
2010); and had its first woman Supreme Court justice (Cecilia Muñoz Palma in 1973) before the
United States had one (Sandra Day O’Connor in 1981). These achievements reflect a long
history of efforts by women to involve themselves equally in governance as well as in society.
The struggle for women’s right to vote was the site for early feminism in the Philippines. It
spanned three decades, culminating in September 1937 with the ratification by the
Commonwealth government National Assembly after a plebiscite vote by women voters on
April 30, 1937. With 447,725 “Yes” votes, a number well above the 300,000-quota stipulated by
the 1935 Constitution, finally “the Filipina got the vote.”
Writer, feminist activist, and beauty queen Pura Villanueva Kalaw wrote and published a
pamphlet in 1952 called: “How the Filipina Got the Vote,” summarizing three decades of
organization and legislative lobbying by women’s groups, with the support – paradoxically – of
men in positions of power.
The women’s organizations primarily responsible for suffrage mobilization had begun as
socio-civic organizations early in the 20th century. The Asociacion Femenista Filipina organized
in July 1905 under the leadership of Dona Concepcion Felix (later married to Felipe Calderon),
and shortly after, Pura Villanueva (later married to Teodoro M. Kalaw) responded to the call to
organize women nationwide by organizing the Asociacion Femenista Ilonga. The objectives of
the organization at that time were limited to social concerns such as prison reform,
improvement of education, and “prevention of individual immorality.” As gleaned from Purita
Villanueva’s early writings published in El Tiempo (a major newspaper in Iloilo), this social
activism was rooted in the concept of women as precisely positioned in the domestic sphere as
shapers of moral sentiments of the young in their care first, as well as influencing their
husbands and other family relations. Education to keep abreast of the times and to hone
rationality were considered important for women to be able to fulfill this role.
A visit to Manila in 1912 by two suffragettes, Dr. Aletta Jacobs from Holland, and Mrs. Carrie
Chapman Catt from the United States, turned the focus of women’s organization to suffrage.
The meeting of Filipino women leaders with the foreign visitors resulted in the organization of
the Society for the Advancement of Women (later changed to Women’s Club of Manila). During
World War I, the Women’s Club of Manila helped government efforts by participating in the
sale of Liberty Bonds and fundraising for the Red Cross.
However, the 1935 Constitution presented yet another hurdle for woman suffrage. The
provision on suffrage stipulated that the right of suffrage shall be extended to women of “not
less than three hundred thousand women” vote affirmatively in a plebiscite. Women’s
organizations did not back down from the challenge and mobilized to get more women
registered and to come out on voting day. The campaign featured a multilingual radio campaign
on the eve of the plebiscite by women leaders Judge Natividad Almeda Lopez (Spanish), Josefa
Jara Martinez (Ilongo), Pilar Hidalgo Lim (English), Concepcion Felix Rodriguez (Tagalog),
Geronima T. Pecson (Pangasinan), Corazon Torres (Cebuano), and Josefa Llanes Escoda
(Ilocano).
Twenty-nine percent of eligible women voters registered to vote from April 10-17, 1937; of
these, about 86 percent eventually voted on April 30, 1937. Filipinas voted 10 to 1 in the
affirmative, handing a victory to the suffragists that exceeded the constitutional quota. Thus,
the women got the vote.
Notwithstanding this early victory, and the generally small gender disparity in the
Philippines, it is in the category of “political empowerment” that the country fares less well –
16th in the world (instead of in the top 10 in other categories). Combine this with the fact that
many women become officials due to their membership in political clans and it’s evident that
considerable distance remains to achieve full empowerment of women. But there is no doubt
that this distance will be far shorter, thanks to the progress forged by Filipinas in the first half of
the 20th century.
References:
https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+the+relation+between+gender+and+society
%3F&source=hp&ei=BW3DYKKjIs36-QaE97ugAw&iflsig=AINFCbYAAAAAYMN7Ff96MeZe-
H79qVLIbiFGB6uIRj-A
https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48642.html
https://waaids.com/item/736-sexuality.html
http://factsanddetails.com/southeast-asia/Philippines/sub5_6c/entry-3876.html