Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CASE COMMENT
FOURTH SEMESTER
3YDC LL.B.
Labour Law-II
1. A worker leaves his work place after his duty hours. He returns after one hour to pick
up his articles. He received injury in an accident at the time of taking his articles. The
employer of the factory refused to pay compensation. Decide.
1 Facts of the Case / A worker leaves his work place after his duty hours. He returns
Statement of Facts after one hour to pick up his articles. He received injury in an
accident at the time of taking his articles. The employer of the
factory refused to pay compensation.
2 Related Topic This problem is related to “in the course of or during the course of
employment”.
3 Framing of Issues 1. Whether the accident was occurred within the course of
employment?
2. Whether worker can he claims compensation?
3. Whether ‘worker returns after one hour to pick up his articles’
is come under in the course or during the course of
employment?
4 Answering the Issues 1. Answering to the first issue accident was not occurred within the
course of employment.
2. Answering to the second issue worker can’t claim compensation
3. Answering to the third issue after one hour he came for taking his
articles is not come under within the course of employment.
5 Provision of Law In the course of or during the course of employment : The
accident must arise out of and in the course of an employment.
Therefore, the personal injury by accident must arise both out of as
well as in the course of a workman's employment. The expression 'in
the course of employment' means in the currency of the employment,
The test is in the course of discharge of duties incidental to the contract
of service. The employee must show that he was at the time of the
accident engaged in employer's business or in furthering with business
and was not doing something for his own benefit or accommodation,
that he was doing something in discharge of his duty to his employer
directly or indirectly imposed upon him by his contract of service
It is wider than arising out of employment. It means duration of
employment (period of time) in which the employment continuous.
The duration of employment commences, when he reaches the place
of employment and ends, when he leaves the place of employment.
Following instances illustrate on this point :
(i) All movements of the workman from one place to another
whether within the premises or outside the premises in
connection with the employment.
(ii) Tea break, lunch break, break for rest etc. (as held in Pruce
vs. Davey).
2. An agriculture labourer died of snakebite while working in the field of his employer. He
was irrigating the sugar cane crops. The employer claimed that he was not workman before
the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner. Decide.
1 Facts of the Case / An agriculture labourer died of snakebite while working in the field
Statement of Facts of his employer. He was irrigating the sugar cane crops. The
employer claimed that he was not workman before the Workmen’s
Compensation Commissioner.
2 Related Topic This problem is related to definition of ‘Workman’
3 Framing of Issues 1. Whether agricultural labourer can be considered as a workman?
2. Whether labourer died within the employment?
3. Whether dependants can claim compensation under workmen
(Employees)compensation act ?
4 Answering the Issues 1. Answering to the first issue agricultural labourer can be
considered as a workman.
2. Answering to the second issue labourer died within the course of
employment.
3. Answering to the third issue dependants can claim compensation
under workmen(Employees) compensation act.
5 Provision of Law Workman : According to Section 2 (1) (n) workman means
any person who is :
(A) A railway servant as defined in Clause (34) of Section 2
of the Railways Act, 1989 except those who are
permanently employed in any administrative district or
sub-divisional office of a railway. Out of this class
also if a person is employed in any capacity as is
specified in Schedule II he will be a workman.
(AA) Any person who is -
(a). A master, seaman or other member of the crew of a ship
;
(b) A captain or other member of the crew of an aircraft
(c) A person recruited as driver, helper, mechanic, cleaner
or in any other capacity in connection with a motor
vehicle,
3. X an employer filed a writ petition in Supreme Court challenging of Minimum wage act
and it affects the fundamental right of the employer guaranteed under Article 19 (i) (g).
Decide
1 Facts of the Case / X an employer filed a writ petition in Supreme Court challenging of
Statement of Facts Minimum wage act and it affects the fundamental right of the
employer guaranteed under Article 19 (i) (g).
2 Related Topic This problem is related Constitutionality of Minimum wages act.
3 Framing of Issues 1. Whether Minimum wages act violates the Art.19 (1) (g)?
2. Whether Minimum wages is unconstitutional legislation?
3. Whether X can challenge the Act?
4 Answering the Issues 1. Answering to the first issue Minimum wages act does not
violates the Art.19 (1) (g).
2. Answering to the second issue Minimum wages act
constitutionally valid.
3. Answering to the third issue X can’t challenge the Act?
5 Provision of Law Constitutional validity of the Minimum Wages Act : TheMinimum
Wages Act, 1948 was passed in pursuance of the draft
convention for fixation of minimum wages adopted at the
International Labour Conference held at Geneva in 1928. However,
there had been a controversy as to the question whether the
Minimum Wages Act, 1948 is violative of Article 19 (i) (g) of the
Constitution ? Article 19 (i) (g) of the Constitution guarantees to all
citizens the right to practice and profession or to carry on any
occupation, trade or business.
The constitutional validity of the Minimum Wages Act is attacked
on the ground that it violates the freedom of trade or business
guaranteed under Article 19 (i) (g) of the Constitution since the
Act affects harshly and even oppressively a particular class of
employers, who for purely economic reasons are unable to pay the
minimum rate of wages fixed by the authorities under the Act,
but have absolutely no dishonest intention of exploiting their
workers; Hence, the employer might find it difficult to carry on
business on the basis of Minimum wages.
(V) Salient Features of the Act: Following are the notable
features of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 -
(i) This Act provides for the fixation of : (a) minimum time
rate of wages ; (b.) a minimum piece rate ; (c) a guaranteed
time rate ; and (d) an overtime rate, for different
occupations, localities or classes of work and for adults,
adolescents, children and apprentices.
(ii) The minimum rate of wages under the Act may consist of
:
6 Relevant Case laws Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd vs. State ofAjmer, (AR 1955, SC 3) on the
ground that, the Act, while fixing the wages beyond the permissible
limits, affects the fundamental right of the employer guaranteed
under Article 19 (i) (g). The Supreme Court rejected this contention
and upheld the validity of the Minimum Wages Act. The Court also
made it clear that, the act is designed to fulfill the constitutional
mandate, embodied in the Article 43 under the Directive Principles of
State Policy. Article 43 of the Constitution requires the State, shall
try to Secure by suitable legislation, ensure all members of the
working class, a decent standard of life. Therefore, the Act is not
violative of Article 19 (i) (g). In other words, it is constitutionally
valid.
Malyalam Plantations Ltd vs. Kerala Slate, (1976, I LU 114
(HC).The concept of minimum wages was to be dynamic. There is
no reason to assume that fair wages fixed years ago should continue
to be fair wages for all time, and any fixation of minimum wages
should be taken not as minimum wages but as fair wages because it
is above the fair wages once fixed
7 Ratio Decidendi The reason for the decision is the intention of the legislature is to
protect the interests of the workmen.
8 Decision The Minimum wages Act is constitutionally valid
1 Facts of the Case / The employer in the instant case provided free transport from factory
Statement of Facts to their houses; when the bus was returning from the factory met
with an accident caused the death of 7 employees to the houses. The
dependants of the employees claims compensation under Workman
(Employee) Compensation Act .
2 Related Topic This problem is related to theory on notional extension
3 Framing of Issues 1. Whether the employees within the course of employment?
2. Whether theory of notional extension can be applicable here?
3. Whether employer should liable to pay the compensation ?
4 Answering the Issues 1. Answering to the first issue employees with in the course of
employment.
2. Answering to the second issue theory of notional extension can
be applicable.
3. Answering to the third issue employer should liable to pay the
compensation.
5 Provision of Law Generally, the work of a workman commences, when he
reaches the place of work, and comes to an end when he leaves the
place of work, after completing his work. The period of going to
place or work and returning home from place of work, is generally
excluded for the purpose of computing out of and in the course of
employment. Eg. ; Traveling to and fro from residence to place of
employment is prima facie not within the course of employment.
However, there are certain circumstances in which the period
of during the course of employment is extended to both the periods
required to reach the place of employment and to return home from
the place of employment. In such cases, if the workman meets with
an accident i.e., without reaching the place of employment or even
after leaving the place of employment, it is treated as out of and in
the course of employment. This principle imposing liability on
employer by extending such period is called "The Theory of
Notional Extension". This situation arises, where the Employer
provides conveyance/transport facilities to the
workmen/employees.
"The Theory of Notional Extension" : This theory did not
define any guidelines nor proper rules have been evolved. The
Courts are adapting this theory taking into consideration, the
circumstances of the case. Thus, the facts and circumstances play
Family Law-II
1. A, Hindu by Ramu died leaving behind his wife-W two sons S1 and S2, two daughters D1,
and D2 father and mother; At the time of his death he left the property Rs. 1.2 lacs as
self acquired property. Distribute.
1 Facts of the Case / A, Hindu by Ramu died leaving behind his wife-W two sons S1
Statement of Facts and S2, two daughters D1, and D2 father and mother; At the
time of his death he left the property Rs. 1.2 lacs as self
acquired property.
2 Related Topic This problem is related to general rules of Hindu intestate
Succession.
3 Provision of Law Meaning and scope: Literally succession means a series or a
chain. Legally succession means a chain of persons who have
a right to take property. The Hindu Succession Act, 1956,
governs the rules relating to succession. The Act provides a
uniform rules for all the Hindus. All these rules are based on
the principle of propinquity i.e. preference of heirs on the basis
of proximity or nearness of relationship. Succession opens at
the time of the death of the person. The idea behind succession
and inheritance (by birth right) is to keep some one to be the
owner of the property. The rules of succession determines who
are the heirs, rules of preference among relations, the manner of
distribution, disqualifications of heirs, mode of devolution
(decentralisation, delegation, transfer)
Jujjavarapu Yesurao v. Nadakuduru Kamala Kumar and
others 2007 (5) ALD 140 The Court held that the Hindu
Succession Act,1956 does not apply to a person who is a
Muslim,Christian, Parsee or Jew.
4 Analysis of the problem Wife (W): wife is a class-I heir she will get the share.
Sons (S1, S2): Sons are class-I heir they will get the share.
Daughters (D1, D2): Daughters are class-I heir they will get the
share.
Mother: Mother is a class-I heir she will get the share.
Father: Father is a class-II heir he won’t get anything in the
presence of Class-I heirs.
5 Solution The total value of the property of Ramu 1.2 laks(1,20,000)
The following are the heirs are available for the purpose of
distribution of property
Wife (W) : 20,000.00
Sons
S1 : 20,000.00
S2 : 20,000.00
Daughters
D1 : 20,000.00
D2 : 20,000.00
Mother : 20,000.00
Father : 0.00
(Class-II heir)
----------------
Total 1,20,000.00
----------------
Rupess One lakh Twenty Thousand only
1) Widow:1/2
2) Father :1/2
3. P a Hindu male dies intestate leaving behind mother who remarried X after the death of T"
father, one predeceased son's widow who remarried Y after the death of P's son, one
daughter and son and daughter of predeceased daughter's daughter. Distribute his property
under Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005.
1 Facts of the Case / P a Hindu male dies intestate leaving behind mother who
Statement of Facts
remarried X after the death of T" father, one predeceased son's
widow who remarried Y after the death of P's son, one
daughter and son and daughter of predeceased daughter's
daughter.
2 Related Topic This problem is related to Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act
2005
3 Provision of Law Changes brought by the Hindu Succession (Amendment)
Act, 2005
1. The Act abolished the prevention of disintegration of
agricultural holdings or the fixation of ceiling for the
devolution of tenancy rights provided under Section 4
(2) HSA, 1956
2. The Act treats daughter as coparcener by birth and
confers all rights in the same manner as the son. Section
6
3. The Act abolished the ancient doctrine of pious
obligation
4. The Act omitted Section 23 of HSA, 1956 which
disentitles a female heir to seek partition in dwelling
house
5. The Act omitted Section 24 of HSA, 1956 which
provides any heir who is related to an intestate as the
widow of a predeceased son, the widow of a predeceased
son of a predeceased son or the widow of a brother shall
not be entitled to succeed the property of the intestate as
such widow if on the date the succession opens, she has
remarried.
6. The Act inserted the words disposed of by him or by her
in Section 30 and thus facilitated any Hindu male or
female to dispose of by will or other testamentary
disposition any property in accordance with the
provision of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 or any
other law for the time being in force and applicable to
Hindus.
7. The Act added four heirs (13-16) as Class I heirs under
Section 8. They are;
4. Sita a Hindu female dies intestate leaving behind her husband, mother, father and sister.
At time of her death Sita was having Rs. 60,000 worth of property given by her parents as
marriage gift and Rs. 50,000 worth of property given by her husband. Distribute the
property among the legal heirs.
1 Facts of the Case / Sita a Hindu female dies intestate leaving behind her husband,
Statement of Facts
mother, father and sister. At time of her death Sita was having
Rs. 60,000 worth of property given by her parents as marriage
gift and Rs. 50,000 worth of property given by her husband.
2 Related Topic This problem is related to general rules of succession to the
property of females
3 Provision of Law Prior to the enactment of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 a
female Hindu had two kinds of properties namely Stidhan and
women’s estate. Over Stridhan, she had full ownership and on
her death it devolved on her heirs. In respect of the property
which she acquired as women’s estate, her position was that of
owner but her power of alienation was limited. On her death,
such property devolved not on her own heirs but upon the next
heirs of the last full owner. Section 14 of the Hindu Succession
Act, 1956 removed the distinction between Stridhan and
woman’s estate and converts existing woman’s estate into
absolute property of Stridhan by conferring on her, absolute
rights. Thus it has enlarged the limited estate into absolute
interest in accordance with the principles of the Constitution.
According to Section 14 any property possessed by a female
Hindu whether acquired before or after the commencement of
this Act, shall be held by her as full owner thereof and not as a
limited owner.
According to Section 15 the property of a Hindu female is
categorised under the following heads;
1. The property inherited by a female from her father or
mother
2. The property inherited by a female from her husband or
father in law and
3. The property obtained from any other source, by
inheritance of otherwise.
According to Section 15(1) the property of a Hindu female
dying intestate shall devolve as per the rules set out in Section
16 of the Act. They are;
a. Firstly, upon the sons and daughters, children of
predeceased son or daughter, husband
b. Secondly, upon the heirs of the husband
c. Thirdly, upon the mother and father
P.Chandra Sekhar LL.M.,SET.,NET., Page 16
Fourth Semester
5 Solution Sita was having Rs. 60,000 worth of property given by her
parents as marriage gift and Rs. 50,000 worth of property given
by her husband. Now both Sixty Thousand and Fifty Thousand
will becomes her absolute property.
Husband: 36,666.66
Mother: 36,666.66
Father: 36,666.66
Sister: 0
Taxation Law
1. AB & Co entered into a contract with CD & Co for supply of materials. However as
dispute arose between them AB & Co terminated the contract with CD & Co on
account of which it received Rs. 2,00,000 as compensation. The assessing officer
raised a demand to pay tax on the amount treating it as a Revenue receipt. Decide.
An amount referable to fixed capital is a capital receipt whereas a receipt referable to circulating
capital would be a revenue receipt.
The objective of Income-tax Act is to tax only income and items, which are construed as income.
Generally, revenue receipts are always considered as income chargeable to tax unless specifically
exempted. Salary, interest, rent, commission etc., are revenue receipts chargeable to tax. Though
share of income received by a partner from a firm is revenue receipt, it is not taxable since it is
exempted under section 10(2A). On the other hand, capital receipts are not chargeable to tax
except when specifically provided in law. Receipts such as loan, corpus donations, compensation
for termination of a source of income are normally considered as capital receipt and therefore not
chargeable to tax. However, compensation for termination of employment received from an
employer is chargeable to tax, inspite of having the character of capital receipt, as it is specifically
provided under section 17(3). Similarly, compensation received by an agent for termination of the
agency is a capital receipt but it is specifically provided as chargeable to tax under section
289(ii)(c).
The distinction between a capital receipt and a revenue receipt should be perceived based on the
facts and circumstances of each case. Factors such as the basis of measurement, the quantum of
periodicity, the nomenclature used by the parties, nature of the transaction etc are not final and
conclusive in judging a receipt as revenue or capital.
In Kamakshya Narain Singh Vs.CIT income was compared to the fruit of a tree or the crop of a
field. If we consider fruit as income, the tree becomes the source of such income. In the same
manner it can be said that when employment is the source, salary is the income. Similarly when a
house property is the source, rent is the income. Income, therefore, should be construed to refer
to periodical monetary return with regularity or some sort of a expected regularity from a known
or definite source. Nevertheless, even a casual and not recurring receipt may have the
characteristics of income and consequently become chargeable to tax.
1. Any amount received towards fixed capital or for fixed asset is a capital receipt whereas
any amount received towards circulating capital or for floating asset is a revenue receipt.
2. Any receipt towards substitution of a source of income is a capital receipt whereas any
receipt towards substitution of income is a revenue receipt.
3. The amount received as a compensation for surrender of any rights of ownership is a capital
receipt whereas compensation received as a loss for future profit is revenue receipt.
4. Ex: Premium on issue of new shares if a capital receipt whereas sales tax collected from
purchase of goods, annuities, royalties etc is a revenue receipt.
Solution: In this problem the Assessing officer raised a demand treating the income as Revenue
Receipt.
Receipt in substitution of a source of income is a capital receipt. Therefore, the amount received
by AB & Co from CD & Co for premature termination of an agency contract is a capital receipt
and hence exempted. The demand of the Assessing officer is not tenable.
2. Rickey Ponting, an Australian cricketer has been coming to India for 100 days every year
since 1997-98
(a) Determine his residential status for the assessment year 2012-130
(b) Will your answer be different if has been coming to India for 110 days instead of 100
days every year.
The above problem can be answered by analysing the provisions of Residential Status along with
its legal implications.
Total income of an assessee cannot be computed unless we know his residential status in India
during the previous year. According to the residential status, the assessee can either be:
i. Resident in India; or
ii. Non-resident in India.
An individual is said to resident in India if he satisfies any one of the following two conditions:
(1) He is in India for a period or periods amounting in all to 182 days or more in the relevant
previous year; or
(2) He is in India for 60 days or more during the relevant previous year and has been in India
for 365 days or more during 4 previous years immediately preceding the relevant previous
year.
Exceptions:
(1) In case of an individual, who is a citizen of India and who leaves India in any previous
year for the purpose of employment outside India, the period of 60 days shall be substituted
by 182 days.
(2) In case of an individual, who is a citizen of India, or is a person of Indian origin, who being
outside India, comes on a visit to India in any previous year, the period of 60 days in the
second condition shall be substituted by 182 days.
An individual who is resident in India, shall be resident and ordinarily resident in India if he
satisfies both the following conditions-
(a) He has been resident in India for at least 2 out of 10 previous years immediately preceding
the relevant previous year And
(b) He has been in India for 730 days or more during seven previous years immediately
preceding the relevant previous year.
An Individual who is resident in India is said to be “not ordinarily resident in India” if he does not
satisfy any or both of the conditions.
Solution
(a) Rickey Ponting satisfies the second condition of Category A because he is in India for
more than 60 days during the relevant previous year and for 400 days during four years
preceding the relevant previous year. Therefore, he is a resident.
Further, in this case, although he satisfied the first condition of category B of being resident for at
least 2 out of 10 preceding previous years but he does not satisfy the second condition of category
B as during 7 years preceding the previous year, he is in India for only 700 dyas. He shall,
therefore, be a resident but not ordinarily resident in India.
(b) Yes. He will, in this case, be resident and ordinarily resident in India. He satisfied both
conditions of category ‘B’ as he was in India for 770 days in the last seven years and he
was resident for at least 2 previous years out of 10 previous years immediately preceding
the relevant previous year.
3. ‘X” a Government servant was sent on deputation abroad. He was given certain
allowances which he claimed as exemption which was subsequently rejected by the Assessing
Officer. Decide.
The Instant problem can be answered by analysing the definition of allowances, taxable allowances
and exempted allowances. Allowance is a fixed monetary amount paid by the employer to the
employee for meeting some particular expense, whether personal or for the performance of his
duties. These allowances are generally taxable and are to be included in the gross salary unless a
specific exemption has been provided in respect of any such allowance
Specific exemptions in respect of allowances are provided under the following sections:
The above allowances shall be exempt either in full or up to a certain limit and the balance, if any,
shall be taxable and thus included in gross salary
Salary or salary
(i) Special allowances for performance of official duties: These allowances are not in the
nature of a perquisite within the meaning of section 17(2) and are specifically granted
to meet expenses wholly, necessarily and exclusively incurred in the performance of
duties of an office or employment of profit. These allowances will be exempt to the
extent such expenses are actually incurred for that purpose.
(ii) Allowances to meet personal expenses: These allowances are granted to the employee
to meet his personal expenses wither at the place where the duties of his office or
employment of profit are ordinarily performed by him or at the place where he
ordinarily resides. These allowances are exempt to the extent prescribed.
Special Allowances which are exempt to the extent of actual amount received or the amount spent
for the performance of the duties of an officer or employment of profit, whichever is less
Solution:
By analysing the above provisions , it is understood that allowances to a citizen of India, who is a
government employee , rendering services outside India is exempted and the decision of the
Assessing Officer is not tenable.
4. XYZ co was incorporated in the year 2011-12. While filing its tax return for the
Assessment year 2012-13, the company claimed certain deductions with respect to rent,
rates, taxes, repairs and insurance for buildings, machinery , plant and furniture as
admissible which was rejected by the Assessing Officer. Decide the validity of rejection
by the Assessing officer in the light of the Income tax Act.
The instant problem comes under the head “ Profits and gains of business or profession. Normally
a business entity can claim certain allowable deductions.
In respect of the business premises used by the assessee, the deduction is available in computing
the income from business for the following items:
(a) Where the premises are occupied by the assessee in his capacity as tenant, the rent paid
for such premises would be deductible. In cases where the assessee has also undertaken to
bear the cost of repairs as part of the terms of his tenancy agreement, the amount of
expenses actually incurred by him on account of repairs would also be deductible.
(b) If the assessee occupies premises not in the capacity of a tenant but as its owner, a lessee
or licensee, the expenses incurred on current repairs to the premises would be deductible.
(c) The assessee is also entitled to deduct any amount paid by him on account of land revenue,
local rates or municipal taxes in respect of the premises.
(d) Any premium paid in respect of insurance against risk of damage or destruction of the
premises, is also deductible.
Income from business or profession should be computed after allowing deductions under section
31 in respect of repairs and insurance of the machinery, plant or furniture used for the purpose of
business or profession. The deduction allowable would cover the amount of expenses on account
of current repairs and also the amount of premium paid in respect of insurance of the machinery,
plant or furniture against risk of damage or destruction thereof.
The assessee is entitled for deduction in respect of repairs and insurance of these assets only if
these assets have been actually used for the purpose of the business of the assessee during the
accounting year the profits of which are subjected to tax.
Thus, if the assets used in some business, income of which is not chargeable to tax, the assessee
cannot claim deduction in respect of these expenses against the income from someotherbusiness,
the profits of which are taxable.The simple test that must be constantly borne in mind is that as a
result of the expenditure which is claimed as an expenditure for repairs, what is really being done
is to preserve and maintain an already existing asset.
DEDUCTIONS: In respect of rent, rates, taxes, repairs and insurance for premises, used for the
purposes of the business or profession, the following deductions shall be allowed:
In respect of machinery, plant or furniture used for the purpose of business, the following
deductions are allowable:
Solution:
In the light of the above, the company claim deduction and the decision of the Assessing officer is
not tenable.
1. Ramu is trading in baniyans under the trademark ‘Villan’. The mark has catched the
market reputation. This is noticed by Somu and started his business in same goods as that
of Rarau but used the trademark 'Villa’. Ramu filed a suit against Somu for infringement
of his own trademark, It appears that Ramu's trademark in not registered—Decide.
1 Facts of the Case / Ramu is trading in baniyans under the trademark ‘Villan’. The
Statement of Facts mark has catched the market reputation. This is noticed by Somu
and started his business in same goods as that of Rarau but used
7 Ratio Decidendi The reason for the decision is trademark was not registered so can’t
claim any remedy here.
8 Decision Though the trademark was unregistered Ramu can’t claim
compensation.
9 Conclusion It was concluded that no person shall be entitled to institute any
proceeding to prevent, or to recover damages for the infringement
of an unregistered trademark
2. Raju a mechanical engineer holds a patent on a Motorcycle. Krishna a brother of Raju
working in the same company rectified the inherent defects of the motor cycle and further
improved the model. Can Krishna get a patent on the new improved Motor cycle ?
6 Relevant Case laws Bajaj Auto Limited Vs.TVS Motor Company Limited SLP (C) No.
13933 of 2009: According to the Bajaj Auto Limited (hereinafter
3. Razajee wrote Ramayana is English and one Balu byname translated it into Tamil and
published by a popular publisher without the permission of Razazee, How far Balu
and the publisher responsible in their liability ? Decide.
1 Facts of the Case / Razajee wrote Ramayana is English and one Balu byname
Statement of Facts translated it into Tamil and published by a popular publisher
without the permission of Razazee, and he instituted the
proceedings against Balu and Publisher.
2 Related Topic This problem is related to infringement of copyright.
3 Framing of Issues 1. Whether translation of a book needs a permission of original
author?
2. Whether Balu committed any violation of copyright?
3. Whether Razee can initiate the proceedings against the Ablu and
publisher ?
4 Answering the Issues 1. Answering to the first issue translation of a book needs a
permission of original author.
2. Answering to the second issue Balu committed violation of
copyright
3. Answering to the third issue Razee can initiate the proceedings
against the Ablu and publisher.
5 Provision of Law Copyright is a form of intellectual property that gives an exclusive
right to the creators of literary, dramatic, musical works, computer
programme, artistic work, cinematograph film and sound
recordings for a certain time period. The creators of these works
gets copyright immediately after expression and requires no formal
registration. Copyright law protects the expressions of ideas but not
the ideas.
1 Facts of the Case / A engaged in manufacturing and selling of shoes and soles
Statement of Facts known as article "007", which has distinctive shape, design,
configuration and surface pattern originated by A. B another
trader started, manufacturing and .selling a shoes and. soles
bearing similar shape, design, features and surface pattern, is an
obvious imitation of A's design. A used for an interim injunction
against B. B submitted that A himself is the pirator-of the
registered design of "Carona Shoe Company Pvt Ltd".
2 Related Topic This problem is related to infringement of designs.
Land Laws
1. Ramu leased out his land to Somu for a period of 10 years for running cotton business
on a monthly rent of Rs. 10,000. Somu used the same land for the purpose of running
a Bar. Ramu wants to cancel the lease after one year—Decide.
1 Facts of the Case / Ramu leased out his land to Somu for a period of 10 years for
Statement of Facts running cotton business on a monthly rent of Rs. 10,000. Somu
used the same land for the purpose of running a Bar. Ramu
wants to cancel the lease after one year
2 Related Topic This problem is related to termination of lease.
3 Framing of Issues 1. Whether Somu bound by his agreement of lease?
2. Whether Somu violated the lease agreement?
3. What is the remedy is available for Ramu ?
4 Answering the Issues 1. Answering to the first issue Somu bound by his agreement
of lease.
2. Answering to the second issue Somu violated the lease
agreement.
6 Relevant Case laws Illustration1:X leased out his house to Y for a period of 5 years
for running a hotel on a monthly rent of Rs. 10,000. Y used the
same house for the purpose of running a Prostitution. X can
terminate lease at any time.
Illustration2: A leased out his house to B for a period of 2 years
for residential purpose on a monthly rent of Rs. 5,000. B used
the same house for selling of smuggled goods. A can terminate
lease at any time.
7 Ratio Decidendi The reason for the decision is Somu breached the expressed
condition in the lease
8 Decision It was held that Ramu can terminate the lease
9 Conclusion It was concluded that termination of lease can be made if the lesses
violates the express condition fixed by the lessor.
2. Government of A.P has assigned 100 acres of land in a village at Tirupati to a group of
five Daiits. One of the Daiits sold his share of assigned land to another Dalit of same
village possessing only one acre of wet land. Discuss the legitimacy of the sale.
1 Facts of the Case / Government of A.P has assigned 100 acres of land in a village at
Statement of Facts Tirupati to a group of five Daiits. One of the Daiits sold his share
of assigned land to another Dalit of same village possessing only
one acre of wet land.
2 Related Topic This problem is related to alienation of assignment of land.
3 Framing of Issues 1. Whether Dalit can transfer his assigned land to anybody?
2. Whether the sale made by the Dalit is valid?
4 Answering the Issues 1. Answering to the first issue Dalit can’t alienate his assigned
land to any other person.
2. Answering to the second issue no sale is not valid.
5 Provision of Law The Andhra Pradesh Land (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 is a
protective legislation which came into force on 21-1-1977. The Act
6 Relevant Case laws Illustration: Government of A.P has assigned 10 acres of land in
a village at Tirupati to a group of five Daiits. One of the Daiits
sold his share of assigned land to another land less Dalit of same
village. Here the transfer is valid.
7 Ratio Decidendi The reason for the decision is assigned land can’t alienate to
anybody.
8 Decision It was held that the sale is invalid.
9 Conclusion The assigned lands can’t be transferred but prohibition is not
applicable if the assigned land is purchased by another landless poor
for a valuable sale consideration from the original assignee or his
transferee.
3. The state government transferred mining rights in a scheduled area to one of its
corporations. One of the tribals residing in that area intends to challenge it as a yiolative
of the A.P. Scheduled Land Transfer Regulation. What are the chances of success ?
1 Facts of the Case / The state government transferred mining rights in a scheduled
Statement of Facts area to one of its corporations. One of the tribals residing in that
area intends to challenge it as a yiolative of the A.P. Scheduled
Land Transfer Regulation.
2 Related Topic This problem is related A.P.Sheduled Land transfer regulation.
3 Framing of Issues 1. Whether government can transfer the mining rights to the
corporation?
2. Whether tribal can challenge the permission?
3. Whether petitioner can succeed in this matter ?
4 Answering the Issues 1. Answering to the first issue government can’t transfer the
mining rights to the corporation.
6 Relevant Case laws Samatha v. State of Andhra Pradesh AIR 1997 SC 3297 Borra
reserved forest area along with its environs consisting of 14 villages,
is the notified scheduled area in Ananthagiri Mandal of
Visakhapatnam District of Andhra Pradesh. The State Government
granted mining leases in this area to several non-tribal persons. The
appellants filed petitions against the State Government and mining
lessees contending that the area in which mining leases were granted
was a notified scheduled area, and the mining leases are against the
Regulation, 1959 and also against the Forest Act, 1980. The
Supreme Court cancelled the mining licenses. Ramaiah v. Ahmed
Badruddin and Another 1989(1) APLJ 452 the sale of land situated
in Scheduled area by a non-tribal to another non-tribal was held to
be a void transaction. A person in possession, though his possession
is unlawful is entitled to protect his possession until he is evicted by
due process of law and seek relief of injunction.
7 Ratio Decidendi The reason for the decision is this area is scheduled area i.e. meant
for tribals.
8 Decision It was held that the minig lease can be cancelled
9 Conclusion It was concluded that According to Section 3 of the Regulation any
transfer of immovable property situated in the Agency tracts by a
person, whether Scheduled Tribe or not, would become absolutely
null and void.
4. A landlord dies ‘without writing a will leaving behind 100 acres of land. He has no legal
heirs. One lady said to a concubine claims the whole of the property. What will happen
to his property ?
1 Facts of the Case / A landlord dies ‘without writing a will leaving behind 100 acres
Statement of Facts of land. He has no legal heirs. One lady said to a concubine claims
the whole of the property.
2 Related Topic This problem is related to doctrine of escheat.
3 Framing of Issues 1. Whether concubine claims the property of landlord?
2. Whether government can claim the property?
4 Answering the Issues 1. Answering to the first issue concubine can’t claims the
property of landlord.
2. Answering to the second issue government can claim the
property.
5 Provision of Law Escheat means reversion of property to the Government or State
in the absence of legal heirs or claimants. The power of a state to
acquire title to property for which there is no owner. In other words,
any property which has no owner shall be vested in the Government.
The Government is entitled to dispose of such property. The
According to this doctrine the property should not be left ownerless.
e.g., A dies without a will or heir, his property will be transferred to
property in the prescribed form within three months from the date
of publication of the notice.
6 Relevant Case laws P. Leslie & Co. v. Violet Ouchterlong Wapshare AIR 1969 SC 843
(849) the Supreme Court held that the property of an intestate who
died without leaving any lawful heir, and also the property of a
dissolved corporation shall pass to the Government by escheat or
Bona Vacantia.
Rex v. Attorney-General of British Columbia (1924) Appeal Cases
213 (PC), it was observed that when there is no private persons
entitled, the Crown takes such property.
G. Narsimha Reddy v. State of A.P 1987 (2) ALT 46 (NRC) the
Court held that without conducting any enquiry as contemplated
under Section 12 of the Act, the authorities cannot just come to a
conclusion that particularly property is an Escheat or Bona
Vacantia.
7 Ratio Decidendi The reason for the decision is concubine can’t be treated as legal
heir.
8 Decision The government becomes the owner of the 100 acres land of
intestate.
9 Conclusion It was concluded that In other words, any property which has no
owner shall be vested in the Government.