Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Description of Structure
The bridge is constructed from a trapezoidal steel box girder
deck with insitu concrete toping. This deck is supported at the
abutments by pairs of guided bearings at each abutment and
fixed bearings at the central pier. Provisions for longitudinal
movement are provided by the guided bearings and expansion
cover plates at each abutment. The box girder will be continuous
over the pier. The deck is also supported by 6 cables per span
connected to the main girder by steel box hanger beams. The
cables run to the top of a central ‘A Frame’ constructed with
steel I sections these Pylon legs are held apart at the top and
extend vertically beyond the cable support to approximately 25m
above the motorway level. Structural steel will be painted yellow
to work with sodium motorway lighting and provide a bold
statement during the day.
The vertical alignment of the bridge deck forms a continuous
curve through the use of 5 straight segments.
The Cable Stay Option was chosen to provide a slim structure thickness while still
enabling two elegant 30m clear spans over a 4 lane motorway with spill through
abutments. This spill through abutment and approach batters will allow the bridge to
appear to have not significantly altered the existing rolling nature of the surrounding
countryside.
Architectural design
General
The urban design scheme developed by Jasmax for the SH18 section of the
Hobsonville deviation is the ceramic or Clay carpet. The proximity of this structure to
Clark House, the proposed location for a museum celebrating the ceramics industry
in the area, has provided inspiration for the urban design theme. The theme
incorporates coloured noise fences, batter treatments to spill through abutments and
the elements of Clarks lane footbridge explained below.
Design of Cable Stay Pedestrian Footbridge – SH18 Hobsonville Deviation and SH16 Brigham Creek Extension
Author: Ben Ryder
Page 2 of 12
As part of the challenge during the tender phase of the project in creating a
architectural feature that would fit into the clay carpet theme, it was necessary for us
to review and identify the key features of the project goals, understanding on the
functionality of the bridge and approach structures as well as spatial availability over,
under and adjacent to the location. During optioning stage, number of alternative
structures were investigated and discounted for the following reasons, too
complicated for the construction, too costly to build, too imposed, too difficult to
maintain or not fitting with the architectural scheme. These rejected forms included a
super tee bridge and ramps (the original sample bridge in the PR), steel box girder
deck, through truss bridge, bow string arch bridge and inclined mast cable stay
bridge. The preferred option was a balanced cable stay bridge. With the bridge
chosen, the adjacent landscape was also extensively rearranged from the original
scope to allow better harmonisation and create a pleasant experience for the end
user either on or under the bridge.
The Ceramic theme is incorporated into the design in three ways. The first is the bold
yellow colour selected by Jasmax for the steelwork this allows the bridge to be highly
visible both during the day and at night with the feature lighting enhancing the light
from the yellow sodium motorway and approach ramp lighting. The second element
of the clay carpet theme incorporated into the bridge is the batter treatment this uses
coloured bricks to create a pattern of alternating clay colours in a wedge the width of
the abutment at the top of the slope tapering to a point at the base of the batter The
third element of ceramic pathway incorporated into the structure is the ceramic tiles
that will be placed in a continuous strip (250mm wide) on either side of the bridge.
These ceramic tiles will be decorated by local artists selected by Jasmax and
Waitakere city council
Artworks
Two artworks will be located on and near the bridge. The first of these is the ceramic
tiles that will be inlaid into the topping concrete of the bridge deck. These tiles will be
decorated by an artist or group of artists to reflect this heritage theme. The artist are
selected though a competition. Currently the artists Matt Mclean and Harriott
Stockman are finalists in the selection process being accessed by Kim Martinengo
(Waitakere City), Caroline Robinson (Jasmax) and Jeff Wells (Jasmax).
The second Artwork created by John Radford this artwork references Sinton House a
historical house required to be demolished as part of the construction. The sculpture
is to be located near the northern abutment of the bridge it uses windows and other
elements recovered from the building. The sculpture will allow the window elements
of the sculpture to be looked through by users of the bridge thus giving these users a
different perspective of both the bridge and the surrounding landscape.
Lighting
To enhance the design at night a specialised lighting scheme was designed. 12
narrow beam Cosmo Polis spotlights are mounted below each cable mount on the
pier frame with elliptical beam lenses and anti glare cowls to illuminate the bridges
deck. These lights offer, enough light for safe movement on the bridge, Architectural
feature enhancement lighting the cables, handrails and pier frame, Minimal glare to
the traffic below, minimal environmental spill lighting, Energy efficient operation over
the life of the installation, Low maintenance and capital expenditure costs.
Continuous LED accent lighting is located on the edge of the girder projecting onto
the sloping surface of the steel girder in order to create a very low light level feature
of the horizontal deck structure to travelers on the road below.
Design of Cable Stay Pedestrian Footbridge – SH18 Hobsonville Deviation and SH16 Brigham Creek Extension
Author: Ben Ryder
Page 3 of 12
On the decks centre line, in ground LED coin lights at 2m centers. These lights offer
to Illuminate the centre-line of the deck to separate its pathways, offer orientation to
users at night and create a visual detail effect.
Lighting is required for safety reasons as the bridge tower is located within 4km of the
Whenuapai Airbase runway. Whilst the top of the tower is located well below the
structure ceiling of the district plan it was thought prudent to provide low intensity
group of omnidirectional light to alert any close aircraft movement in the area
Analysis
To model the actions on the bridge effectively three- Stay Cable Connection positions
beam elements between
dimensional structural modelling was required. From
this the moment, shear and torsion envelopes are
Box Beam (Beam/plate element)
developed for the design of each element. Dynamic With Fixed Bearings
analysis for pedestrian loading required the
calculation of maximum accelerations of the bridge Steel Pier Frame (Beam elements)
Seismic design.
The design philosophy set out in the Transit New Zealand Bridge Manual1 is similar
to that of other NZ design codes when dealing with seismic design. Structures are
designed to withstand the loading generated by an earthquake of a specified return
period which in this case was 1000 years.
Due to the complexity of the structure geometry the equivalent static force method
depicted in the bridge manual cannot be used. Modal analysis was required by the
code. Modal analysis was performed using Strand 7 and checked using the modal
analysis feature of Space Gass. In both these analysis the natural frequencies were
calculated followed by two spectral response analysis load cases these were
Design of Cable Stay Pedestrian Footbridge – SH18 Hobsonville Deviation and SH16 Brigham Creek Extension
Author: Ben Ryder
Page 5 of 12
transverse and longitudinal earthquakes these cases had 100% of the spectra
applied in one principal direction and 30% in the other direction to account for the
simultaneous occurrence of earthquake shaking in two directions.
Seismic Detailing
Girder restraints were an important aspect that was considered early in the design as
these affected both the seismic response and the dynamic response of the bridge
under pedestrian loading. The restraints at the abutment were required to deflect
longitudinally for both thermal and seismic reasons. The deflection and uplift imposed
on these bearings was too great to be accommodated by standard elastomeric
bearings (±15mm thermal and ±75mm seismic). A secondary restraint is provided by
the abutment walls, if the deflection is exceeded the girder will impact with the flat
face of the end of the girder into the back wall of the abutment thus preventing further
deflection. Should the lateral restraint of the bearings fail the wing walls will prevent
the girder moving laterally.
The restraints at the pier were required to transfer a high shear load from the
longitudinal earthquake to the tower as this is the only load path available given that
the abutment bearings are allowed to move for thermal reasons. The load on these
bearings is unusual and has initially posed some problems for the bearing
manufacturers as the lateral load is high compared to the vertical load. This is
because the vertical load is transferred to the tower via the cables. The secondary
mechanism should these bearings fail is that the girder will become a pendulum that
can move between the abutments thus reducing the stiffness of the system and
therefore the loading imposed. The cables are strong enough to carry the additional
dead loading.
The tower is required to resist high lateral loadings from earthquakes in both principal
directions and was sized to resist all earthquake loadings. A high equilibrium torsion
loading is applied to the tower cross members due to the eccentricity of the bearings
to the shear centre of the cross member. This member was found to be sufficient
even to resist this torque though the I section that it is constructed from is relatively
weak in torsion.
The base plate for the tower is required to transfer high moments from the tower legs
to the concrete plinth. In order to prevent a brittle failure mechanism of bolted
connection failure the connection was designed using hierarchy of strength
principals. By designing the connection to resist the over strength moment from the
tower leg a ductile plastic hinge will form in the base of the tower.
The piles were chosen to be bottom driven 600 diameter steel tubes which will be
filled with concrete and the upper portion reinforced upon completion of driving.
Because of their slender nature they are not able to resist large moments in bending
therefore they were arranged in two rows of five two metres apart connected by a 1m
deep ground beam. This allowed the moments applied by the tower to the top of the
pedestal to be resited by push pull couples between pile pairs this force was then
resisted by skin friction and end bearing.
Cables were chosen over stress bars due to their high strength and continuous
unjointed nature. Bars have the disadvantage that if they become loaded in
compression during dynamic loading (avoided by prestress to the design earthquake)
they will buckle and yield this yielding will result in a permanent kink in that will most
likely not be removed when the bridge returns to the self weight loading condition.
Design of Cable Stay Pedestrian Footbridge – SH18 Hobsonville Deviation and SH16 Brigham Creek Extension
Author: Ben Ryder
Page 6 of 12
Geotechnical and pile design.
Geotechnical investigations in the location of Clarks Lane
footbridge consisted of Bore Holes, Hand augers and Cone
Penetrometer testing. This testing revealed three types of soils
that were present to a depth of 40m where the base rock (East
coast bays formation ECBF siltstone) was found. These soils
were:
Tauranga Group Alluvium Clay (Atcl), A Pleistocene-aged
relatively weak silty clay (c=6-15, =23-27, =17)
Tauranga Group Alluvium sand (Ats), A Pleistocene-aged loose
to medium dense silty (c=0-5, =28-30, =18)
ECBF (Ew,Eu) (part of the Waitemata Group) comprising
Tauranga group
alternating beds of weak siltstone and sandstone(Eu). located at Alluvium clay (Atcl)
about 35 to 40m below existing ground level the upper surface
is highly to completely weathered with the consistency of
residual soil. (Ew) (c=10, =30-35, =18-20 higher values
represent unweathered rock)
Following these investigations it became evident that it would be
uneconomic to found this structure on the bedrock and that
bottom driven piles founded on the denser sand layer
approximately 18m below ground level. Tauranga group
The soil layers were modelled as Winkler springs evenly Alluvium sands (Ats)
Es = drained Youngs Modulus of the soil, Epile = Youngs Modulus of the pile, Ipile =
second moment of area of the pile section, s = Poissons Ratio and D = diameter of
East Coast Bays
pile.
formation (Eu “Rock”)
Existing alluvium sands may have been locally comprised of firm
to stiff silts and clays. This could have presented considerable Figure 5 Geological
resistance to pile penetration even under heavy driving conditions Long section extract
due to a state of pile hydraulicing, preventing further penetration.
The designers approach to overcome this issue was to allow the excess pore water
pressures developed by driving process to dissipate and then re-striking the pile to
continue to drive the pile to the design depth.
Testing of the piles design strength was undertaken in two ways the first was during
the final stages of driving the sets were measured and the Heiley formula used to
calculate the vertical load capacity of the piles. The second method was to test two
piles (15% of piles) using PDA testing and capwac analysis. This PDA testing was
carried out approximately one week after driving so that the final capacity of the pile
could be observed without the influence of excess pore pressures.
To ensure lateral and uplift capacity and to ensure that the strength observed was
not due to the Hydrolicing effect a target depth was specified as well as design
strength.
Design of Cable Stay Pedestrian Footbridge – SH18 Hobsonville Deviation and SH16 Brigham Creek Extension
Author: Ben Ryder
Page 7 of 12
Pedestrian Dynamics
Low natural frequencies and low system damping are typical characteristics of wide
span pedestrian bridges such as this bridge. Bridges such as this one are therefore
often sensitive to dynamic loads especially when excited in resonance. The resulting
bridge motion will not only reduce the comfort when passing over the bridge but in
the worst case may cause dynamic loadings to the structure far in excess of the
static design loading. Therefore careful consideration was applied to the dynamic
loading of the bridge under pedestrian loading
Walking is a complex process and it gives rise to a complex load that varies with time
position and quantity as a person or group of people walk across. It can be separated
into vertical and horizontal effects. Both the loading from a single person and a group
of people was considered as the dynamic effect of a single individual is generally
greater than the dynamic effect of two or more individuals (with some exceptions
discussed later) the reason for this is illustrated below.
The sum of the dynamic load of a number of pedestrians walking with different
frequencies and phases adds up to an irregular load with a dynamic magnitude less
than that of a single individual (even though the static magnitude is clearly much
greater).
The Transit New Zealand Bridge Manual refers to the British standard BS5400 Part 2
or BD37/01 for dynamic pedestrian loading the acceptable limit for the vertical
acceleration in this code is 0.5SQRT (fo) where fo is the frequency corresponding to
the vertical fundamental frequency for the bridge. It does not provide guidance for
horizontal acceleration limits noting that these are generally less than vertical limits
as are more easily perceptible however it does state that if the natural frequency of
horizontal motion is greater than 1.5Hz then horizontal motion will not be an issue.
This was found to be the case for this bridge because of the combination of the
restraints (fixed at the pier and guided at the abutment) and the stiff girder. The
horizontal frequency was found to be 2.2Hz well outside the limit set by BD 37/01.
Recommendations for the application of dynamic loading using Strand 7 have been
taken from the Connell Wagner paper “Serviceability assessment of footbridges and
floors for pedestrian induced vibrations.”2 This paper is based largely on Allen DE
and Murray TM, “Design criterion for vibrations due to walking,” Engineering Journal
American Institute of steel Construction 1993 3
Design of Cable Stay Pedestrian Footbridge – SH18 Hobsonville Deviation and SH16 Brigham Creek Extension
Author: Ben Ryder
Page 8 of 12
BD 37/01 has a forcing function of P=0.180 sin (2fot) (KN) at a velocity of vt=0.9fo (in
m/s) however the application of a moving load in both time and space cannot be
easily modelled therefore the approach detailed in below has been adopted noting
that the above BD37/01 load corresponds to and value of 0.125 (refer below for
explanation of ). Within the frequency range most likely to cause uncomfortable
resonance (0-5Hz) the proposed loading below is greater.
Design of Cable Stay Pedestrian Footbridge – SH18 Hobsonville Deviation and SH16 Brigham Creek Extension
Author: Ben Ryder
Page 9 of 12
represent the stepping harmonic excited. The strand 7 harmonic analysis
automatically varies the load as 0.7cost.
The frequency range is set to ± 1 Hz to analyse frequencies either side of the
natural frequency to allow graphs of the acceleration at a range of excitation
frequencies to be created.
A graph for the acceleration of the same node where the load will be applied was
created and exported to excel for further analysis.
From the graph of the maximum value of the acceleration is identified and
reduced by the reduction factor R = 0.7 for footbridges. This factor is included to
allow for the fact, ‘full steady- state resonance is not achieved when someone
steps along the beam instead of up and down at mid-span and the walker and the
person feeling the vibrations are not simultaneously at the location of maximum
modal displacement’ reference. Allen DE and Murray TM, “Design criterion for
vibrations due to walking,” Engineering Journal American Institute of steel
Construction 19932
Clarks Lane Footbridge showed first natural frequency of 1.5Hz which was just
outside the range of normal walking (slower than normal walking) The analysis was
showed a peak acceleration of 0.35mm s-2 this was less than the limit set out by
BD37/01 of 0.63mm s-2
Design of Cable Stay Pedestrian Footbridge – SH18 Hobsonville Deviation and SH16 Brigham Creek Extension
Author: Ben Ryder
Page 10 of 12
able to move, meaning that the impact from their footfall will be small and of higher
frequency, thus outside resonant range.
If all walkers are perfectly in step with correlation of 1.0 the correlated loading per
square metre (at 0.8 people per square metre) would be simply be 0.8 times the
single pedestrian loading function applied as a pressure. However this correlation is
not likely to happen in practice a correlation of between 0.2 and 0.4 is probable. The
lower bound value is the one of primary design interest. This may is considered to be
the level of correlation that may occur without significant dynamic motion of the
bridge. If analysis demonstrates that accelerations at this level of correlation are low
then further correlation is unlikely. If accelerations are already high at this level then
correlation is likely to increase up to the 0.4 level.
Using the 0.2 correlation factor and the average value of the pedestrian loads and a
crowd density of 0.8 people per square metre gives the following load functions now
expressed as uniformly distributed area loads rather than point loads from a single
pedestrian these will be applied in Strand 7.
P(t)vertical = 36 cost Pascal
Note that if the analysis predicts ‘unacceptable’ accelerations due to the loading of
equations above then further correlation may be expected and ‘things will get worse’.
To predict how bad things may get the upper limits of loading will be applied:
P(t)vertical = 90 cost Pascal
The equivalent horizontal loading functions were not applied to the bridge as the
natural frequency for horizontal motion of the deck was 2.2Hz which is well outside
the limit of 1.5 Hz set by BD 37/01.