Argonne's Energy Systems Division uses techno-economic analysis (TEA) models to evaluate the economic performance and market potential of new energy technologies. The models identify major cost drivers to inform research priorities that reduce costs and increase competitiveness with conventional fuels. Models assess production, delivery, and fueling infrastructure for hydrogen and other alternative fuels. Analysis supports industry and government investment decisions for fleet deployment and infrastructure build-out.
Argonne's Energy Systems Division uses techno-economic analysis (TEA) models to evaluate the economic performance and market potential of new energy technologies. The models identify major cost drivers to inform research priorities that reduce costs and increase competitiveness with conventional fuels. Models assess production, delivery, and fueling infrastructure for hydrogen and other alternative fuels. Analysis supports industry and government investment decisions for fleet deployment and infrastructure build-out.
Argonne's Energy Systems Division uses techno-economic analysis (TEA) models to evaluate the economic performance and market potential of new energy technologies. The models identify major cost drivers to inform research priorities that reduce costs and increase competitiveness with conventional fuels. Models assess production, delivery, and fueling infrastructure for hydrogen and other alternative fuels. Analysis supports industry and government investment decisions for fleet deployment and infrastructure build-out.
STAKEHOLDERS PRIORITIZE INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS Argonne’s Techno-Economic Analysis ARGONNE’S TAKE “Barriers to market acceptance (TEA) Capability of alternative low-carbon fuels typically stem from the high costs THE CHALLENGE ARGONNE’S APPROACH of fuel production and/or delivery Conducting a Techno-Economic Researchers in Argonne’s Energy infrastructure. Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) can be important in Systems Division have been Analysis (TEA) identifies major assessing the economic performance performing TEAs with support from cost drivers in the fuel supply and thus the potential market the U.S. Department of Energy chain, which informs R&D and acceptance for new technologies. (DOE) since the mid-2000s when product development planning TEAs identify major cost drivers DOE started addressing the barriers with the goal of reducing cost to and defines possible pathways to to adoption of hydrogen—and be competitive with conventional attain price thresholds at which a specifically hydrogen energy fuel supply for a particular end new technology can match and infrastructure—as an alternative to use. Both the cost of the fuel thus becomes competitive with a petroleum-based fuels. The barriers and its environmental implication current technology—which can make are mainly the infrastructure’s lack of (such as its carbon intensity switching to the new technology availability and cost (see sidebar). based on life cycle analysis or feasible and thus more attractive Argonne has expanded its suite of LCA) are important metrics to to consumers and industrial users TEA models to evaluate the cost identify future fuel and vehicle because of other perceived benefits, of fuel production and delivery technology options that meet such as reliability, accessibility, processes such as electro-fuels both cost and environmental sustainability (i.e., reuse or recycling (e-fuels), synthetic chemicals, targets, thus guiding their market potential that establishes a “circular upcycling of waste products to deployment plans.” economy”), and/or environmental lubricants and fuels, and the fast –Amgad Elgowainy benefits (e.g., lower emissions). charging of battery electric vehicles. Senior Scientist / Electrification and Infrastructure Group Leader Energy Systems Division
February 2021 ENERGY SYSTEMS DIVISION
Argonne’s TEA models are ☐ Heavy-Duty Refueling Station
“bottom-up” tools. They provide an Analysis Model (HDRSAM)— THE IMPACT engineering-level view of process performs TEAs for refueling Argonne regularly works design options, sizing (or scale), heavy‑duty FCEVs. with government agencies and pricing of myriad components, In the Argonne TEA models, the and industry to evaluate as well as material and energy inputs hydrogen infrastructure is defined the viability of various fleet at the process level. The models can as being between the production connect upstream and downstream and other infrastructure- gate to vehicle tanks, which covers processes to evaluate various supply related investment decisions, transportation and distribution as one chain scenarios and options. becoming a trusted partner element (encompassing conditioning Argonne has developed three and compressing the hydrogen and with a broad grasp on trends principal models for the TEA space: delivering it to the city gate and within in hydrogen usage in other ☐ Hydrogen Delivery Scenario the city to the refueling station) and energy production modes: Assessment Model (HDSAM)— refueling (e.g., where the models petroleum refineries, biofuels, consider whether the station is performs TEAs for hydrogen ammonia plants, synthetic delivery to light-duty fuel cell supplied by gas or liquid, its size, fuels and chemicals, pipeline electric vehicles (FCEVs) . demand levels, etc.); hydrogen production is not part of the models. injection, steel production, ☐ Hydrogen Refueling Station and light-, medium-, and Analysis Model (HRSAM)— heavy‑duty vehicles.1 performs TEAs for refueling light‑duty FCEVs. These capabilities can be deployed to address your HYDROGEN DELIVERY SCENARIO ANALYSIS MODEL (HDSAM) particular scenario using a Techno-Economic Analysis or other of our analysis tools, including life cycle analyses, PENETRATION LEVELIZED COST our GREET (Greenhouse Gas OP Emissions) software, and still 0 25 50 75 100 AL E other tools. RA IT CAP
TING
Visit the Energy System
MARKET Division’s Hydrogen Delivery EN E GY R Scenario Analysis Model site, where you can also access INPUTS NI NG ST more than 20 TEA-related CONDITIO
OR
publications and reports
AGE
produced by the TA Group
MODE since 2006. TR A N S P O RT
PIPELINE TRUCK CUMULATIVE
DELIVERY DELIVERY CASH FLOW CONTACT Amgad Elgowainy Senior Scientist / Electrification and Infrastructure Group Leader Energy Systems Division Typical components examined in a Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) of fuel delivery infrastructure. Phone: 630-252-3074 Email: aelgowainy@anl.gov Michael Q. Wang 1 See also: Elgowainy, A., M. Mintz, U. Lee, T. Stephens, P. Sun, K. Reddi, Y. Zhou, Manager, Systems Assessment G. Zang, M. Ruth, P. Zadun, E. Connelly, and R. Boardman, 2020, Assessment of Energy Systems Division Potential Future Demand for Hydrogen in the United States, ANL/20-35, Phone: 630-252-2819 Argonne National Laboratory, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and Email: mwang@anl.gov Idaho National Laboratory, October. www.anl.gov/es