You are on page 1of 2

ENERGY SYSTEMS DIVISION

HELPING ENERGY INDUSTRY


STAKEHOLDERS PRIORITIZE
INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS
Argonne’s Techno-Economic Analysis ARGONNE’S TAKE
“Barriers to market acceptance
(TEA) Capability of alternative low-carbon fuels
typically stem from the high costs
THE CHALLENGE ARGONNE’S APPROACH of fuel production and/or delivery
Conducting a Techno-Economic Researchers in Argonne’s Energy infrastructure. Techno-Economic
Analysis (TEA) can be important in Systems Division have been Analysis (TEA) identifies major
assessing the economic performance performing TEAs with support from cost drivers in the fuel supply
and thus the potential market the U.S. Department of Energy chain, which informs R&D and
acceptance for new technologies. (DOE) since the mid-2000s when product development planning
TEAs identify major cost drivers DOE started addressing the barriers with the goal of reducing cost to
and defines possible pathways to to adoption of hydrogen—and be competitive with conventional
attain price thresholds at which a specifically hydrogen energy fuel supply for a particular end
new technology can match and infrastructure—as an alternative to use. Both the cost of the fuel
thus becomes competitive with a petroleum-based fuels. The barriers and its environmental implication
current technology—which can make are mainly the infrastructure’s lack of (such as its carbon intensity
switching to the new technology availability and cost (see sidebar). based on life cycle analysis or
feasible and thus more attractive Argonne has expanded its suite of LCA) are important metrics to
to consumers and industrial users TEA models to evaluate the cost identify future fuel and vehicle
because of other perceived benefits, of fuel production and delivery technology options that meet
such as reliability, accessibility, processes such as electro-fuels both cost and environmental
sustainability (i.e., reuse or recycling (e-fuels), synthetic chemicals, targets, thus guiding their market
potential that establishes a “circular upcycling of waste products to deployment plans.”
economy”), and/or environmental lubricants and fuels, and the fast –Amgad Elgowainy
benefits (e.g., lower emissions). charging of battery electric vehicles. Senior Scientist / Electrification
and Infrastructure Group Leader
Energy Systems Division

February 2021
ENERGY SYSTEMS DIVISION

Argonne’s TEA models are ☐ Heavy-Duty Refueling Station


“bottom-up” tools. They provide an Analysis Model (HDRSAM)— THE IMPACT
engineering-level view of process performs TEAs for refueling Argonne regularly works
design options, sizing (or scale), heavy‑duty FCEVs. with government agencies
and pricing of myriad components, In the Argonne TEA models, the and industry to evaluate
as well as material and energy inputs hydrogen infrastructure is defined the viability of various fleet
at the process level. The models can as being between the production
connect upstream and downstream and other infrastructure-
gate to vehicle tanks, which covers
processes to evaluate various supply related investment decisions,
transportation and distribution as one
chain scenarios and options. becoming a trusted partner
element (encompassing conditioning
Argonne has developed three and compressing the hydrogen and with a broad grasp on trends
principal models for the TEA space: delivering it to the city gate and within in hydrogen usage in other
☐ Hydrogen Delivery Scenario the city to the refueling station) and energy production modes:
Assessment Model (HDSAM)— refueling (e.g., where the models petroleum refineries, biofuels,
consider whether the station is
performs TEAs for hydrogen ammonia plants, synthetic
delivery to light-duty fuel cell supplied by gas or liquid, its size,
fuels and chemicals, pipeline
electric vehicles (FCEVs) . demand levels, etc.); hydrogen
production is not part of the models. injection, steel production,
☐ Hydrogen Refueling Station and light-, medium-, and
Analysis Model (HRSAM)— heavy‑duty vehicles.1
performs TEAs for refueling
light‑duty FCEVs. These capabilities can be
deployed to address your
HYDROGEN DELIVERY SCENARIO ANALYSIS MODEL (HDSAM) particular scenario using a
Techno-Economic Analysis
or other of our analysis tools,
including life cycle analyses,
PENETRATION LEVELIZED COST our GREET (Greenhouse Gas
OP Emissions) software, and still
0 25 50 75 100 AL E
other tools.
RA
IT
CAP

TING

Visit the Energy System


MARKET
Division’s Hydrogen Delivery
EN E GY
R Scenario Analysis Model site,
where you can also access
INPUTS NI
NG ST
more than 20 TEA-related
CONDITIO

OR

publications and reports


AGE

produced by the TA Group


MODE since 2006.
TR
A N S P O RT

PIPELINE TRUCK CUMULATIVE


DELIVERY DELIVERY CASH FLOW
CONTACT
Amgad Elgowainy
Senior Scientist / Electrification
and Infrastructure Group Leader
Energy Systems Division
Typical components examined in a Techno-Economic Analysis (TEA) of fuel delivery infrastructure. Phone: 630-252-3074
Email: aelgowainy@anl.gov
Michael Q. Wang
1
See also: Elgowainy, A., M. Mintz, U. Lee, T. Stephens, P. Sun, K. Reddi, Y. Zhou, Manager, Systems Assessment
G. Zang, M. Ruth, P. Zadun, E. Connelly, and R. Boardman, 2020, Assessment of Energy Systems Division
Potential Future Demand for Hydrogen in the United States, ANL/20-35, Phone: 630-252-2819
Argonne National Laboratory, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and Email: mwang@anl.gov
Idaho National Laboratory, October. www.anl.gov/es

You might also like