Engineering

Simple beam with cantilever ends

Asked 4 years, 4 months ago Modified 1 year, 1 month ago Viewed 3k times

I'm trying to find the maximum bending moment and deflection for this symmetrical simple
beam. The formulae I can find, deal with either cantilever beams with one fixed end, or
0 continuous beams without cantilever ends, not this kind of situation.

I've tried to model the beam as two fixed-end cantilevers, on the basis that symmetry
demands the middle of the beam is horizontal, and then modelled the loads as separate
loads superimposed. But I'm not getting anywhere and not sure how I'd tell whether my
answer was correct, if I did. I don't know if the fact that the beam can rise or fall in the middle
(depending how F compares to W) is the problem, or if it's something else.

The beam won't be exposed to non-linear behaviour. It could bend either way, as I don't
know whether the 2 point forces will be larger or smaller than the UDL, or the exact lengths
involved.

Is there an easy way to work out the maximum deflection and B.M. of this beam, and if so,
what are they?

Note, this isn't homework or coursework (I haven't had those for many years!). It's part of a real-
world practical design I'm trying to work on.

beam

Your privacy
By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose
Share inImprove
information this question
accordance Follow Policy.
with our Cookie asked Mar 27, 2019 at 14:11
Stilez
571 6 17
Accept all cookies

Necessary cookies only

Sorted by:
3 Answers
Highest score (default)
Customize settings
 You are correct that symmetry demands that rotation at midspan be zero. However, as you
also mentioned, there will obviously be deflection at midspan as well. You therefore cannot
3 simplify the structure by placing a fixed support at midspan (not entirely sure what you meant
by "two fixed-end cantilevers", since you'd obviously still need to consider the pinned
support).

Instead, you need to simplify the structure by putting a "fixed rotation" support. That is, one
which only resists rotation, presenting no force reactions, just a bending moment reaction.

That being said, you seem to be trying to do this from tables, without going into the math. In
that spirit, let's see what we can do. For the record, I don't have a table handy, so I did some
googling and will be using this one.

For starters, let's make use of the superposition principle and look at the loads individually (or
rather, look at the distributed load first and then the pair of concentrated forces later).

Let's start with the distributed load:

Calculating the results for the midspan is straightforward. Just pretend this is a simply
supported beam with no cantilevers (obviously this only works because the distributed load is
only on the span and not on the cantilevers).

Looking at tables, we know that the bending moment and deflection at midspan are

2
wL
Mmidspan =
8
4
5wL
δ midspan = −
384EI

(Note I'm using w and later F positive in the downward direction, feel free to invert the signs
if you prefer another convention)

But what about the cantilevers? Well, we trivially know that Msupport = 0 since the entirety of
the distributed load is absorbed by the supports, so there's nothing on the cantilevers to
generate any moment.

However, the cantilevers will present a deflection due to the rotation at the support. Though
the lack of loading means that the cantilevers will act as undeformed straight beams, they will
Your privacy
suffer a rigid-body rotation which will lead to a deflection at the end.
By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose
information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
Basic trigonometry tells us that the vertical deflection of the cantilever will be equal to

δ cant = d ⋅ tan θsupport

However, civil engineers are lazy, so we just take the first-order Taylor series of tan θ, and
simplify it to merely θ (this is only valid for small deflections and rotations, but that's the
usual space inhabited by civil engineering, so it's fine for our purposes). So we can simplify
the above to merely
 δ cant = dθsupport

In this case, θsupport can also be found in tables, and is equal to

3
wL
θsupport =
24EI
3
wL
∴ δ cant = d
24EI

Now let's move onto the concentrated forces:

We know that the bending moment diagram for these forces will look like this:

We can trivially observe that Msupport = −F d (negative because it generates tension on the
top fibers). The constant bending moment diagram along the span tells us that the totality of
each concentrated load is entirely absorbed by the nearest support. This means that, as far as
the span is concerned, there are no concentrated forces at all! It's only being acted upon by a
constant bending moment.

Therefore, we can change the model (when looking at the midspan) into this:

Thankfully, this case is present in many tabled results. We already know the bending moment,
but we're still looking for the deflection.

My table only has the result for a single concentrated bending moment at one end, so we'll
just have to double the deflection it gives us for the midspan (which we know is where the
maximum deflection actually happens in our case):

2 2
ML F dL
δ midspan = 2 × =
16EI 8EI

So with that we have the bending moment diagram due to the concentrated loads and the
Your privacy
maximum
By clicking “Acceptdeflection atyou
all cookies”, midspan due to
agree Stack those loads
Exchange at the
can store cantilever.
cookies on your device and disclose
information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.
What we don't yet have, however, is the deflection at the cantilevers themselves.

For that, we'll need to get a bit creative.

The deflection at the cantilevers is a function of two things: the rotation at the support and
the additional deformation which happens between the support and the cantilever's end.
Thankfully, both of those things are easy to find.
 The rotation at the support can be found using the same concentrated-bending-moments
model we used to find the deflection at midspan, and then looking at the same table. In this
case, the table gives us the rotation at the support with the bending moment and at the
other. It also gives them different signs since the beam has a positive slope on one end and a
negative slope on the other. In our case, we're just going to add both of those values
ignoring the signs, since our double-bending-moment case will increase the rotation at both
supports.

ML ML ML
θsupport = + =
6EI 3EI 2EI

Now, just as we did with the distributed load, the deflection at the cantilever due to this
rotation at the support can be easily found:

δ cant,rotation = dθsupport

As for the additional deflection due to the cantilever's deformation after the support, we can
simply model the cantilever alone as if it had a fixed support instead of a pinned one.

The table I used before doesn't actually have cantilever results, but I remember that a
cantilever's maximum deflection is equal to

3
Fd
δ cant,def orm =
3EI

We can therefore conclude that the total deformation at the cantilever due to the
concentrated loads is equal to

3
Fd
δ cant = dθsupport +
3EI
3
ML Fd
= d +
2EI 3EI
3
F dL Fd
= d +
2EI 3EI
2 3
F d L d
= ( + )
EI 2 3

After all that, we now bring everything together by adding the results from the distributed
load and concentrated forces:
Your privacy
By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange
2
can store cookies on your device and disclose
information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. wL
Mmidspan = − Fd
8
4 2
5wL F dL
δ midspan = − +
384EI 8EI

Msupport = 0 − F d

3 2 3
wdL F d L d
δ cant = − ( + )
24EI EI 2 3

Share Improve this answer edited Mar 27, 2019 at 16:51 answered Mar 27, 2019 at 16:43
 Follow Wasabi ♦
13k 7 36 61

Wow. Just.. Wow. Thank you for an answer that I can not just use, but work from if I need other
solutions like it! –  Stilez Mar 27, 2019 at 18:43

I don't think we can have an exact solution or even a proper estimate without having some
numbers. If you look at the BM diagram of the structure, it looks something like this:
1

Now, it is quite obvious that without knowing the lengths and the load values involved we
will never be able to estimate which peak will be higher. Similarly, for deflection, the
magnitudes of the load affect the deflection pattern.

Share Improve this answer Follow answered Mar 27, 2019 at 15:39
Schneider
93 8

This is actually pretty helpful - thank you! –  Stilez Mar 27, 2019 at 18:43

Your privacy
By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose
information
HINT in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

After drawing Free Body, Bending moment M /EI diagrams, integrations by

0
First & Second Moment Area Methods

help determine rotations and deflections.

Share Improve this answer Follow answered Jun 15, 2022 at 19:18
 Narasimham
279 2 9

Your privacy
By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose
information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.