Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Candidate details
Ramadoss
Counsellor details
Dutco Balfour Beatty LLC Quantity Surveyor 29 March 2014 12 June 2016
Bharti Realty Limited Assistant Manager - Projects 18 May 2011 18 November 2011
North East Construction Site Junior Engineer 02 June 2009 10 June 2010
Quantity Surveying & Construction - Pre July 2018
Mandatory competencies
12 12
I am aware of the capital and revenue expenditure . I have
acquired knowledge on the various financial ratios.
Business planning 1 Business planning is a logical decision making process through 13 March 2019
which the company’s goals and objectives are set based on
12 12market analysis and forecasting. The plan is continuously
updated using a feedback system and by measuring
performance.
I have also learnt that Client care is being open to feedback and
12 rectifying the process . In addition, Client care is providing the
Client a clear scope of works that I (or) my firm is competent of
performing. I understand the importance of maintaining the
lessons learned / feedback register.
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Client care 2 While working on the Container Terminal project in Dubai, I had 13 March 2019
prepared the project management plans which made the Client
aware of the structure, process and functioning of each
department. I used to update my Client with quarterly cash flow
projections which facilitated them to have better financial
readiness.
12
Communication and 1 I am aware of the different types of communications like verbal, 13 March 2019
negotiation non-verbal, written and graphical and I know what method of
12 communication is appropriate for a particular situation. I have
used all these forms of communication as part of my professional
role.
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Conflict avoidance, 1 I understand that the key reasons for conflicts in construction 13 March 2019
management and projects are incomplete information, uncertain risk allocation,
dispute resolution changes, poor contract administration, etc. Conflicts can be
procedures avoided by proper risk allocation, by preparing comprehensive
and unambiguous contract documents and by fair and consistent
contract administration.
12
Health and safety 1 Most of the GCC countries are members of the International 13 March 2019
Labour Organization and have ratified the Arab Agreement No.(7)
of 1977 in relation to health and safety. In Saudi Arabia, this led to
12 the Labour Law (Royal Decree No. M/51) in 2005.
I know that Employer’s must provide a clean and safe work place,
PPE, appropriate safety training, regular health checks and
compensation in case of injury to all its employees. I have read
the RICS ‘Surveying Safely’ guidance , which provides useful
12 guidance on best practice.
Health and safety 2 I wear all the essential PPE’s during site visits and ensure that I 13 March 2019
have received the required induction.
In the current metro rail project, during site visit, I noticed that a
deep excavation done for cable laying was left unprotected in
middle of an active site. I immediately stopped the works,
12 reported it to my safety team, and made sure that the issue has
been rectified personally.
Data Management 1 I maintain a log of recent tender returns to build up our internal 13 March 2019
cost database and benchmark prices received. While using the
cost data from previous projects, I am aware that it needs to be
12 adjusted for fluctuations, time, quality, etc. I am aware of BCIS
operated by RICS, which provides the cost database.
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Sustainability 1 Sustainability is achieving development without depleting the 13 March 2019
limited natural resources available. I am aware of the three pillars
of sustainability - environmental, social and economic.
Teamworking does not stop within the company but also includes
the suppliers / subcontractors who support our business and work
towards our objectives.
12
I am aware of the Latham’s report on constructing the Team.
Conduct rules, ethics 1 Ethical and professional standards are an important part of my 13 March 2019
and professional professional and personal activities, which will uphold the name of
practice
12 the firm I work for in a positive way and will promote trust in the
profession.
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Conduct rules, ethics 2 During the procurement of subcontractors for the Container 13 March 2019
and professional Terminal Project in Dubai, I found that my friend’s father was the
practice director of a company, which was bidding for one of our Project
work packages. I immediately identified this as a conflict of
interest and conveyed the same to my manager. I recommended
that this conflict could be resolved if I was to limit my involvement
12 and delegate the contract award decision to my line manager .
12
I am attending CPD’s regularly on topics related to my profession
through RICS’s webinars and seminars.
Conduct rules, ethics 3 While procuring the aggregate suppliers for the Container 13 March 2019
and professional Terminal project, I was approached by one of the quarry owners
12
practice with gifts and illegitimate offerings in order to influence me. I
rejected those offerings and advised the supplier that this
approach is not appropriate since it is unethical. I informed my
manager of this and advised my management to restrain from
doing any sort of business with him in the future as that may give
him the chance to influence others.
12
12
12
12
12
Summary of Experience - Technical Competencies
Core competencies
12 12
I am aware of the various types of tendering such as open
tendering, selective tendering, single and two stage tendering,
negotiated tendering and e-tendering. I am aware of the code of
practices which are to be followed during the tendering process,
12 12
in particular the FIDIC Procurement Procedures Guide 2011 and
the FIDIC Tendering procedure 1994 which provide guidance on
selection of tender list, tender period and tender process
management.
12
12
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Procurement and 2 In Chennai Metro Rail project, while procuring subcontract for the 13 March 2019
tendering construction of a G+3 building which was a variation work, I opted
for the Traditional re-measurable route . The reason was that we
had a fully developed design and complete BoQ prior to
tendering. The selected route helped me in obtaining similar and
competitive price from all the bidders.
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Project financial control 1 Financial control is a key tool to ensure the project success for 13 March 2019
and reporting the client. The monthly financial report highlights to the client all
the provisional sums expended, instructed variations, anticipated
variations, contractor’s claims and re-measured quantities where
applicable. It is a tool to demonstrate to the client the position of
the project against the budget and how contingency is being
12 managed.
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Project financial control 3 In my current metro rail project, working for a PMCM consultant, I 13 March 2019
and reporting noted that the number of claims related to unrecognized changes
has kept on increasing . In order to control it, I advised my
management and contractor to follow a “Technical Change
Request” form to initiate any change. In this request, all the
details of the change will be recorded including the originator,
12 cost impact & time impact and shall be approved by the Client.
This helped in regularizing the changes and reduced the number
of claims .
12
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Quantification and 2 In my current metro rail project working for a PMCM consultant, I 13 March 2019
costing of construction have prepared the bill of quantities for an exhibition center for
works tendering purpose . Before commencing my quantities take-off, I
collected all the relevant drawings and specifications and
calculated the quantities in accordance with POMI. I measured
and listed all the activities starting from site preparation,
12 excavation, concrete works, structural metalwork, finishes,
finishing and fittings. I then prepared the Bill of Quantities
including the preambles and preliminaries.
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Construction technology 1 I am aware of the different design stages, which are Preliminary 13 March 2019
and environmental design, Definitive design and Issued for construction .
services
In KSA, buildings must be constructed in accordance with the
Saudi Building Code which is based on the International Building
Code. The building owner must obtain a b uilding permit from the
12 municipality and approval from the Civil Defence with regards to
fire protection design .
The viaducts segments and tunnel rings in the metro projects are
precast whereas the crane rail beam in the container terminal
project was cast in-situ . The use of precast viaduct segments
12 with the post tensioning technique helped us in evading erection
of complex scaffolding in middle of the busy roads and complete
works at a faster pace.
I was involved with the well point and deep well dewatering
system in the container terminal project and Chennai metro rail
12 project respectively.
12
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Commercial 2 While working on the Container terminal project , I prepared the 13 March 2019
management of Contractor Cost Value Reconciliation reports on a monthly basis. I
construction prepared on the basis of the subcontractor / supplier liabilities,
payment schedule, material reconciliation and labour report.
When reporting value, I reported 100% on variation instructed and
agreed, 50% on variations instructed but not agreed in quantum
12 and nothing for additional work completed but not yet instructed.
This provided a safe approach in monitoring our profit.
12
I prepared the productivity reports and material reconciliation
reports on activity basis and compared them with the allowances
to highlight my project manager the areas where the required
productivity is not achieved and advised them to take necessary
corrective measures to achieve the targets.
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Contract practice 1 I learnt through my degree studies that to be enforceable, a 13 March 2019
contract must have offer and acceptance, consideration, certainty
of terms and capacity.
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Contract practice 3 While working on the Container Terminal project on bespoke form 13 March 2019
of contract, I recommended my management to procure major
subcontracts on a back-to-back basis . I explained that the impact
of any delay or cost escalation from these subcontracts would be
so great on our main contract that we needed to transfer our risks
to these subcontractors and maximize our cost certainty.
12
In the same project, during the procurement of crane rail
subcontractor, I advised to incorporate the PI cover and
guarantee for design as the subcontractor had design liability.
12
12
12
12
12
12
Optional competencies
12
12
Competency Level Summary of Experience Achieved
12
Design economics and 1 I understand that Design economics is a process of 13 March 2019
cost planning understanding the economics associated with a building design
and using it appropriately to create an efficient and cost effective
option. The study on design economics needs to be initiated at
early stages so that any major changes can be incorporated with
ease. I am aware of the factors that affect the economy of the
12 design such as building shape, arrangement, storey height, room
size etc. I know the components which make up the whole life
cost of the buildings and its difference from the life cycle cost.
12 While working for the contractor on the Chennai metro rail project
, after understanding the requirements of my construction team
and in coordination with our design team, I have prepared the
cost plans for a casting and stacking yard at concept design,
schematic design and definite design stages. At the concept
design stage, I prepared the cost plan using benchmarking data
12 from similar projects based on the GIA of the building. At
schematic design stage, I prepared the cost plan using
approximate quantities and functional unit rates. I estimated the
contingencies based on a draft risk register. At definitive design
stage, I prepared a complete BoQ and firm up the key costs by
obtaining quotations from the market. Using the cost plan, I have
12 made sure that the project is not exceeding the budget allowance.
12
Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Record
Description: Health, Safety and Asbestos removal: Planning and management Formal
Description: Client Care, Health and Safety and APC Interview skills by Mr. Informal
Ramesh Palikila, FRICS
Learning I developed my knowledge on the process of establishing the
outcomes: client's objectives / KPI's and handling their complaints. I learnt the
importance of following the health and safety principles on site. I
also developed my knowledge on the various personal protection
equipment’s available.
16 November 2018 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 4.00 hours
Description: Accounting Principles and Processes by Fellow RICS - Mr. Ramesh Informal
Palikila FRICS
Learning I developed my knowledge on the profit and loss account, balance
outcomes: sheet etc. I learnt about the different types of assets and liabilities
and about the revenue and capital expenditures.
19 October 2018 Activity type: Online/Distance Learning 4.00 hours
Description: Design Economics and Cost Planning, Quantification and Costing Informal
by Mr. Ramesh Palikila, FRICS
Learning I understood on how the design of a structure affects its economy. I
outcomes: learnt the importance of cost planning and understood how it is
prepared. I learnt about the different types of estimates. I enhanced
my understanding of Life cycle costing and whole life costing. I also
enhanced my knowledge on value engineering and management.
Date CPD Hours
28 September 2018 Activity type: Online/Distance Learning 4.00 hours
Description: Rules, Ethics and Code of Conduct by Fellow RICS - Mr. Ramesh Informal
Palikila FRICS
Learning I have enhanced my knowledge on the RICS five global
outcomes: professional and ethical standards. I understood the RICS CPD
requirements and developed my skills in handling situations
involving conflict of interest.
31 August 2018 Activity type: Online/Distance Learning 0.50 hours
Description: Unabsorbed Head overheads and Loss Profit Claims [RICS Formal
Webinar]
Learning I developed my knowledge on Overheads and its types. I learnt
outcomes: about the things which are included in the Head office overheads. I
developed my knowledge on how a loss of profit can be proved
while making a claim.
11 August 2018 Activity type: Online/Distance Learning 0.50 hours
Learning I learnt about the key changes made in the second edition of FIDIC
outcomes: Red, Yellow and Silver Books 2017 in comparison with the 1999
‘first editions’ of those contracts.
01 August 2018 Activity type: Online/Distance Learning 1.50 hours
Learning Review and discussion on the key issue of the Case study.
outcomes:
18 July 2018 Activity type: Online/Distance Learning 1.50 hours
Description: Discussion with counsellor on Design economics and cost planning Informal
Description: FIDIC Red Book 1999 Clauses relating to Time, Cost and Quality Formal
[RICS Webinar]
Learning Detailed understanding of FIDIC Sub-Clauses related to Extension
outcomes: of Time for Completion, Contractor's Claim, Contract Price, Issue of
Interim Payment Certificates, Payment, Delayed Payment, Variation
Procedure, Employer's Taking Over, Statement at Completion,
Performance Certificate etc.
04 June 2018 Activity type: Online/Distance Learning 1.50 hours
Learning I learnt about the RICS’s five Professional & Ethical Standards and
outcomes: importance of these standards. I gained information on the helplines
available for the RICS members and gone through various
scenarios which enhanced my ideas about ethical behavior.
23 May 2018 Activity type: Other 2.00 hours
Learning Preliminary discussion on the project and key issue selected for the
outcomes: case study.
20 April 2018 Activity type: Online/Distance Learning 1.50 hours
Description: UNCITRAL Model Law 1985 and the 2010 UNCITRAL Arbitration Informal
Rules
Learning Learnt the reason for using the UNCITRAL Model Law. Enhanced
outcomes: my knowledge on the mandatory rules applicable while following the
model law and the main provisions of it.
04 April 2018 Activity type: Other 2.00 hours
Description: Discussion with counsellor on Project financial control and reporting Informal
Description: Discussion with counsellor on Client care, Team working, Data Informal
management and Sustainability
Learning Discussed with Counsellor on the things covered under these
outcomes: competencies and ways to enrich my knowledge related to these
competencies.
11 January 2018 Activity type: Conference/Workshop/Seminar 3.00 hours
Learning Learnt about the Contract procedures involved in dealing with the
outcomes: Contractor's claim. Learnt the stages and timelines involved in
dispute settlement process.
10 January 2018 Activity type: Other 2.00 hours
PREPARED BY:
VEDHAKUMAR RAMADOSS
Case study
Date the project or piece(s) of work were carried out: March 2017 to June 2018
Confidentiality statement
The following case study contains confidential information included for the purpose of the
Assessment of Professional Competence. I could not obtain the consent of my Client to reveal their
name and the Project name. Hence, the name of my Client and the name of the Project are not
disclosed in my Case study. Therefore, the information is not to be used for any other purpose or by
any person other than those authorized by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (i.e. Limited
1
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
Contents
1. Introduction............................................................................................................................... 3
2. My Approach ............................................................................................................................ 4
3. My Achievements ..................................................................................................................... 9
4. Conclusion.............................................................................................................................. 10
Total word count: 2,987 words (Not including Cover page, Confidentiality statement, Contents and
Appendices)
2
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
1. Introduction
This primary objective of this case study is to demonstrate my understanding and experience on
various competencies set out by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) in the ‘Quantity
Surveying and Construction’ pathway.
I will present one of the key issues which I encountered in my current project along with the options I
have identified to overcome it. I will exhibit the reasoning behind the option selected and the
outcome of it.
1.1. Project Overview
The project is one of the world’s largest metro rail system executed in order to mitigate the urban
transit problems caused by the city’s rapid urban growth. The network once completed, will
interconnect airport, financial centres, universities and other modes of public transportation. The
project is divided into three design and build packages and contracted to three Consortium of
contractors.
I work for the PMCM Consultant who is managing Package No. 1, which includes the following
works:
Total Route Length : 63 km
16 km of bored tunnels
2 km of mined tunnels
1 km of cut and cover tunnels
25 km of viaducts
19 km of At-Grade
Total Number of Stations : 38 Stations [12 Elevated, 22 Underground & 4 At-grade]
Number of Depots : 3 Depots
Number of Park & Ride : 4 Numbers of multilevel car park structures
Form of Contract : Bespoke Contract
Package no. 1 is currently 70% complete. Majority of design works and the whole of bored, mined
and cut & cover tunnel works are completed. The viaduct works were completed in June 2018. The
works, which are under progress, are construction of stations, laying of tracks and associated
system works.
The value of Package no. 1 is US dollars 10.2 billion and the value of the whole project is US dollars
23 billion.
3
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
Underpass.
Twelve Km of approach and re-routed roads along with all the street furniture’s and utilities.
These works are to be progressed ahead of the metro works so that once the “Metro Works
Contractor” [MWC] reaches this stretch, it will be ready for his possession.
The RWC’s programme of works was shared with the MWC. In accordance with the MWC’s
contract, it is their responsibility to coordinate with any third parties who may be related to their
works. In reference to this, after monitoring the performance of RWC, the MWC notified the
Engineer about RWC’s slow performance and their concern that the works would not be completed
on time. This issue was then escalated to the Employer who issued several delay notices to the
RWC and asked the RWC to accelerate his works.
4
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
Three months after start on site, the RWC had not shown any major progress and had not
responded to the Employer’s request for acceleration and mitigation plans.
Frustrated with the RWC and as the completion of these road works were of upmost importance, the
Employer’s metro division requested for our advice to identify the best-suited way forward.
As a Quantity Surveyor with experience in Subcontract procurement and management, I was
assigned with the responsibility to identify and analyse the options for this scenario and recommend
the best option to our management and thereby to the Employer.
Understanding the Employer’s Objectives
I held a brain-storming session with the Employer’s team to fully understand their requirements and
priorities. The following were the priorities set forth by the Employer:
a) Time: Any delay in the completion of the underpass and associated works would delay the
handover of this stretch to the MWC. This would have an impact on the MWC’s program and
subsequently delay the metro project’s completion and the operation. This would lead to:
Delay Compensation to MWC
Loss of Income to the Employer
Prolonged disruption to the public
Derogation of Employer’s public image
b) Cost: The Employer intended to complete the road works at a similar price to the agreed
RWC contract. This was to avoid the various internal approvals should the price exceeds the
budget which could delay the works further.
c) Quality: The Employer did not want to compromise on the quality of the works, as any
quality issues would subsequently affect the quality of the metro works.
Preliminary Review – Site, RWC’s Contract and Timelines involved
The contract between the RWC and the Employer was a bespoke contract based on FIDIC Red
Book – First Edition 1999. The procurement route was traditional. I analysed the scope of works
from the contract agreement, reviewed the RWC’s programme of works and the Bill of Quantities.
I then performed an overall site inspection in order to ascertain the volume of works completed.
Based on my site visit, I found out that the RWC had not executed any major works except for the
site establishment. After completing my site survey, using the RWC’s rates, I calculated the value of
works yet to be executed.
In coordination with my Project Controls team, I identified the following:
From the MWC’s programme, identified that the site needs to be handed over to them by
May 2018, which was 2 months after the RWC’s planned date for completion.
5
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
Reviewed the programme of works submitted by the RWC and calculated that the time
required to complete the works would be 11 months.
2.2. Analysis of the possible options
With the establishment of the Employer’s objectives – fixed budget and a very stringent timeline, I
identified the following 3 options:
1. Explore the reasons for the RWC’s non-performance and recommend to the Employer to
provide relevant assistance to complete the works.
2. Recommend the Employer to terminate the existing RWC and request the MWC to carry out
these works through a Change Notice.
3. Recommend the Employer to terminate the existing RWC, award the time critical works to
the MWC and appoint a new contractor to carry out the noncritical works.
2.2.1. Option 1 – Explore the reasons for the RWC’s non-performance and recommend to
the Employer to provide relevant assistance to complete the works
My reasoning in considering this option was that, if I was able to identify the reason for the RWC’s
non-performance, with the Employer’s assistance, I would be able to assist them to overcome the
issue and accelerate their performance.
In order to identify the reasons for the RWC’s non-performance, I reviewed the following documents
to ascertain the resources available and financial position of the RWC:
Financial Statements
List of Plant & Machineries the Contractor owns
Manpower list
Current projects being executed
On reviewing the above documents, by carrying out a thorough market investigation and by meeting
the Contractor’s top management, I identified that while the Contractor had a strong financial
capability with enough resources to complete the project, their organization was undergoing an
internal restructuring. This led to many conflicts within the organization which could be the reason
why the project was not managed properly.
Reason for not considering this option
Although by this option, the Employer’s objectives of cost and quality could have been achieved, I
decided that this would not be the best option to proceed with for the following reasons:
Employer’s primary objective of completing the road works on time and handing over to the
MWC was at stake.
There was little that the Employer could do to resolve the Contractor’s internal issues.
6
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
2.2.2. Option 2 – Recommend the Employer to terminate the existing RWC and request the
MWC to carry out these works through a Change Notice
As it was ascertained that the RWC shall not be able to perform and complete the works on time, I
proceeded to this second option which was straight forward and had a greater probability of
completing the works on time.
To execute this option, I requested the MWC to submit their price to carry out the RWC’s scope of
works. The contractor submitted his proposal by using the rates derived from the contract’s
“Schedule of Lump-sum Prices” [SLSP]. The price submitted by the Metro Works Contractor was
USD 25,161,720.
On reviewing the price submitted by the MWC, I found that their proposal was higher than the
budget price by 12.60%. The main reason for the higher price is that the MWC’s rates were based
on their SLSP prices and included a higher percentage for general services and risk.
Reason for not considering this option
Although the MWC was capable of completing the works on time and to the required quality, their
price in total was higher than the budget for which the Employer will not agree. Therefore, I decided
to explore a third option.
2.2.3. Option 3 – Recommend the Employer to terminate the existing RWC, award the time
critical works to the MWC and appoint a new contractor to carry out the noncritical
works
Upon tabulating and comparing the prices received from the MWC against the RWC, I identified the
following:
For the underpass construction works – the MWC’s price was higher than the RWC’s price
by only 7% on an average.
For the road construction works – the MWC’s price was higher than the RWC’s price by 19%
on an average.
Further, the construction of underpass was on the critical path and any delay in its completion will
have impact on the metro works construction.
Upon identifying this, in order to prioritize the time critical works, I coordinated with my Construction
Manager and Project controls team and demarcated the underpass scope of works and road works
scope with an idea to sublet the scopes to different parties.
I decided to approach the MWC for the underpass works as their price for the underpass works
were only slightly higher than the RWC. In order to bring the MWC’s price within the budget, I
prepared to negotiate with the MWC on behalf my Project Director. If I succeed in the negotiation, I
would be able to award the time critical underpass works to the existing MWC through a Change
7
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
Notice. By this, the underpass works could be started immediately, completed promptly and the
work fronts can be handed over to the MWC on time.
In order to negotiate, I analysed the prices submitted by the MWC. I concentrated on the concrete
rates as they formed the major part of the price. On analysis, I identified that the MWC has used the
SLSP rates for Concrete as per the metro works specification. The MWC has not taken into
consideration the change in technical specifications for the underpass structure like increased crack
width, concrete durability and performance requirements which were less stringent than in the metro
works. With the help of my design team, I calculated the reduced quantities of steel reinforcement
and cementitious materials per cubic meter of concrete and based my negotiations for the concrete
rates on this. Furthermore, I negotiated MWC’s preliminaries percentage as these works did not
encompass similar risks as in the metro works and were quite straightforward. Subsequently the
MWC revisited their rates and submitted a price for the underpass construction works which was
almost equal to my budget.
For the non-critical road works, I enquired with three [3] more specialised contractors and obtained a
price similar to the budget price through my effective negotiation and by providing an increased
advance payment after obtaining permission from the Employer.
Reason for preferring this option
By awarding the critical path underpass works to the MWC, the team could complete the works on
time and would avoid any delay allegations from the MWC. Also the quality of the construction
works would be in par with the metro works.
By awarding the non-critical works to a third party contractor, the works could be executed within the
budget.
2.3. Critical appraisal of the selected option
The selected option enabled us to achieve all the set Employer’s objectives and allowed us to
complete the works within the budget and time.
Time: In option 1, there was a greater uncertainty in regards to the completion time as the RWC’s
internal issue was not under the control of the Employer. Whereas in options 2 and 3, the critical
works were carried out by the experienced MWC who had the resources readily available, was able
to start these additional works immediately and can complete the works on time.
Cost: In regards to the cost, options 1 and 3 were the most suitable ones. In option 1 the cost has
been finalized and agreed between the Employer and RWC, whereas in option 3 for the critical
works, the MWC price was negotiated and brought down to the budget and for the noncritical works
a new contractor within the budget was identified.
Quality: All the 3 identified options were suitable to achieve the required quality.
8
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
As noted above, option 3 was the only option, which was satisfying the Employer’s objectives of
completing the road works within the time, budget and with proper quality.
Percentage exceeding
12.60% -0.76%
the Budget
Time for Completion 12 Months 11 Months 11 Months
Underpass Works Aug-17 to Apr-18 Aug-17 to Apr-18
Mar-17 to Feb-18
Road Works Aug-17 to Jun-18 Sep-17 to Jun-18
3. My Achievements
I presented the selected option to my management and that was agreed by them. On behalf of my
management, I made a presentation to my Employer exhibiting the options identified, analysis made
and recommended my Employer to accept Option 3, explaining in detail how it would satisfy all the
Employer’s objectives and how it would mitigate the risk of cost and time overrun to the project. My
Employer decided to follow my advice and gave his consent to proceed with this option.
On obtaining the Employer’s approval, I prepared the draft Change Notice which was issued by the
Engineer. For the noncritical road works, my Employer entered into an agreement with the selected
third party contractor. For the RWC, I advised the Employer to issue the termination notice.
9
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
The underpass works were completed in April 2018 within the budget and the work fronts were
handed over to the MWC before their requested date (i.e) May 2018. The noncritical road works
were completed in June 2018 within the budget.
Lessons Learnt:
Through working on this key issue and finding an optimal solution, I have:
4. Conclusion
In dealing with this key issue, I realised the importance of identifying and focusing on the Employer’s
objectives in order to select a solution that would satisfy all parties. In this instance, I was fortunate
that option 3 could fulfil all of my Employer’s objectives but I am mindful that in many instances, I
would need to focus on my Employer’s priorities and advise them how to achieve the best
compromise possible. Throughout this process, I had several opportunities to take a high degree of
responsibility and make significant recommendations.
This key issue helped me to realize the importance of having a sound knowledge in construction
technology. My understanding of the construction process involved in the underpass and road
structures helped me to initiate option 3 and allowed me to keep costs under control. My
understanding of the concrete specifications provided me with strong arguments to negotiate lower
rates with the contractor. I also learnt how basing negotiation on facts and substantiations were key
to achieve win-win situations. While the Contractor has initially applied advantageous rates, they
were satisfied that the final price was fair and reasonable which contributed to develop trust and
respect in our professional relationship.
10
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
I made a good effort to comply with professional ethics and protect my Employer’s interest by
advising on this issue. The level of confidence accomplished and the skills gained by dealing this
issue made me more efficient to handle critical issues in the future.
Total word count for your case study – 2,987 Words [Not including Cover page,
Confidentiality Statement, Contents and Appendices]
11
Vedhakumar Ramadoss, RICS Membership No. 5600735
12