Fingerprint Report

As a result of the investigation I’ve performed, I conclude that the plain whorl and ulnar loop
fingerprints I gathered at the crime scene are not the same person. This is because they had
different patterns when I examined their fingerprints after collecting them. Their ridges are
different, as their cores and deltas. The pattern of a plain whorl in which the ridge from the series
of circles or spirals around the core axis, and has two deltas, while the pattern of an ulnar loop, in
which one or more ridges enter either side of the empression, also has one delta. Therefore, I can
prove that they are different people. While the witness states that the suspect he saw performing
a crime is the plain whorl. But when I examined the plain whorl the result came out is the ulnar
loop. So I conclude that the suspect who commits a crime is the ulnar loop and the alleged
suspect is the plain whorl because I based on my findings and the results of my investigations not
the others opinions.

Submitted by: Marjorie G. Teodosio

Submitted to: Ronald Tamayo