Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
1
Techno Fysica is a combination of two departments
of two individual former large Dutch shipyards,
which merged as a result of the yards going into
bankruptcy
Techno Monitoring
Techno Diagnosis
2
Techno Monitoring:
3
Most common type: shear pin, in all sorts and sizes
4
Some typical applications:
5
With the latest achievement the measuring installation of Allseas “Pioneering Spirit”,
here during calibration of the system in Rotterdam harbour
6
Techno Diagnosis has the following main activies:
7
8
The subject for this presentation:
9
In the propulsion installation of a Suez Max class tanker, cracking was
noted in the corners pockets of the intermediate shaft of the propulsion
installation.
10
The failure was investigated by DNV , with main conclusions:
11
The calculated service life for these vessels was 75 year, well in excess
of projected service life of the vessel. However, the true service life was
found to be less than 6 year.
The ship met with all class regulations and the necessary design
calculations were made (and found to be in order)
12
Approach:
Trial measurements,
13
Stress measurements:
14
Torsional Vibration Calculation and measurements results during trials
The graph (next page) contains a summary of the TVC, adapted to the
measured dynamic load on the instrumented location.
15
Torsional vibratory torque in Stb OD shaft of HN 1749 SHI
Torque [kNm]
800 Barred
750
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Shaft speed [rpm]
Dyn. Torque
Speed up slow down Propeller curve Nominal Calculated
Ballast condition
16
Torsional Vibration Calculation and measurements results during trials
The maximum calculated dynamic torque amounts to 760 kNm at 41.2 rpm
compared to the maximum measured dynamic torque of 748 kNm at 44
rpm in the undisturbed diameter of ø390xø125 mm which is a good fit.
The small difference (less than 7%) between measured- and calculated 1st
node natural frequency is most likely caused by a difference in the
assumed amount of entrained water in the propeller.
17
With the measured dynamic torque of 748 kNm (0-peak) at 44 rpm, the
measured shear stress in the OD shaft at the diameter ø530xø210 mm
(where also the slot is located) amounts to 26.3 N/mm².
Note that this is the stress in an undisturbed diameter, not in the slot
itself
18
The maximum calculated shear stress in the slotted area amounts to a
value of 108 N/mm².
The empirical calculated SCF amounts to 3.84 which proves that this
calculated value is conservative compared to the value that follows from
the FEA (+7%).
19
20
The results from the FEA calculations were that the SCF that
will be used in the provisional life time calculation is 4.1, the
maximum shear stress amplitude at resonance at 44 rpm in the
undisturbed diameter is 26.3 N/mm² (based on manufacturer
measurements) and the maximum shear stress in the slot is
108 N/mm².
These values are used to compare the findings after the sea
trials by the manufacturer to the findings after the trials by
Techno Fysica to compare life time expectance.
21
Instrumentation
To link theory to every day practice, Techno Fysica has performed the
following instrumentation:
22
Such measurements have an impact on operations.
23
Measurement results
24
Measured load during controlled operation
Transit
combinator 682 / 677 104.5 / 104.5 7461 / 7405 96 / 95 9
Harbour
combinator 497 / 519 105 / 105 5446 / 5705 70 / 73 10
Constant
speed 686 / 673 104.5 / 104.9 7562 / 7391 96 / 95 9
25
Measured load during automatic data acquisition
26
27
Fluctuations
during speed
up…….
28
….And during
speed down
29
Clearly undesirable regulator behaviour during a speed-up
30
In the last graph it can clearly be seen that the installation reaches the
desired speed setting of 63 rpm from standstill in 2.5 seconds.
However, the speed drops again and remains in the barred speed range for
approximately 12.5 seconds before stabilising at 63 rpm which leads to an
increase in the number of cycles that contribute to the fatigue load from 4
(single pass) to 25 which means an increase by a factor of 6.25.
31
It is worth noticing that the maximum torque (and therefore stress in the slot) that
occurred during the period of automatic data acquisition was higher by a factor of 2
compared to the value that was measured by the manufacturer during initial sea trials.
This means that during normal operation and without active aware intervention by the
crew, the dynamic load can be high without being noticed which of course has a
negative effect on expected life time of the OD shaft.
This behaviour was discussed with the engine manufacturer, and they found it very
hard to believe that dynamic torque could be twice as high as during sea trials.
However, the setting of the torque meter was checked and double checked and found
to be correct which was proven by the realistic values of the mean torque during the
measurements which comes from the same measurement system.
Therefore the conclusion that dynamic torque as high as 1500 kNm can occur in the
shaft line is justified.
32
Average dynamic load during the measurement period
The time frame during which the system has recorded data stretches to 1551
hours.
During this period, the main engines were stopped for 441 hours which leaves
1110 hours of data with the main engines in operation over a period of 10.5
weeks.
This means that the life time of the OD shaft is mainly determined by the number
of start-stops and the way these cycles are passed, i.e. how much fuel is injected
and does the engine pass the barred speed range once or, as it is now, three to
five times during each pass
33
Life time prediction
TF in Stavanger 0.61 6 15
34
•Conclusions
35
5 The maximum level of vibratory torque is approximately twice as high as
during the measurements by the manufacturer during sea trials (1500
kNm 0-peak compared to 748 kNm 0-peak).
7 Given this factor we would advise to find a different way to get feed
back from the pitch setting because this slot has a very high
influence on fatigue life of a shaft in a direct coupled two-stroke
installation.
36
The main cause of the problem:
The speed control of the engine during passing the BSR is unstable,
resulting in several passes during a single speed up or slow down
action which results in higher amplitudes and up to 6 times the number
of cycles with high amplitude compared to a single, straight pass.
37
The end
Thank you for your attention
38