10/14/22, 6:24 PM Akshita Akhil: Managerial Report on Hamilton County Judge Case Analysis

Higit Pa
Bumuo ng Blog
Mag-sign in

Akshita Akhil
Monday, 18 July 2016 About Me

Unknown
Managerial Report on Hamilton County Judge Case
View my complete profile
Analysis
Blog Archive
MANAGERIAL
REPORT ▼ 
2016
(5)
▼ 

To            : Dr. Binu P Paul ▼ 

July
(5)
▼ 

Approaches to Management
From        : Akshita Akhil
Sample Business Letters
Team
      : 1 Organizational Structural Report of
Indian Oil Cor...
Date         : 09/07/2016 Managerial Report on Hamilton County
Judge Case An...
Subject   : Hamilton county judges
How to Manage Windfall Gains
Case
study analysis

This case study refers to the performance of

the judges in the different courts of
Hamilton County. In this case study we
analyze three different courts such as
Common pleas court, Domestic relations
court and Municipal court. The
performance of Judges is in each and every court
is analyzed using probability
techniques.

Probability of cases appealed and reversed

Probability
of Probability
of
Total
cases Appealed Reversed
Courts cases being cases being
disposed cases cases
appealed reversed

Common Pleas Court 43945 1762 199 0.0400955 0.0045283

Domestic Relations
30499 106 17 0.0034755 0.0005573
Court

Municipal Court 108464 500 104 0.0046098 0.0009588

Common
Pleas Court

Total Probability of Probability of Probability of

Appeale Reverse Total
Judges cases cases
being Rank cases
being Rank reversal given Rank
d cases d cases rank
disposed appealed reversed an appeal

Fred Cartolano 3037 137 12 0.04511031 14 0.003951268 6 0.08759124 5 25

Thomas Crush 3372 119 10 0.03529063 4 0.002965599 4 0.08403361 4 12

Patrick Dinkelacker 1258 44 8 0.03497615 3 0.0063593 12 0.18181818 14 29

Timothy Hogan 1954 60 7 0.03070624 2 0.003582395 5 0.11666667 9 16

akshitaakhil.blogspot.com/2016/07/managerial-report-on-hamilton-county.html 1/3
10/14/22, 6:24 PM Akshita Akhil: Managerial Report on Hamilton County Judge Case Analysis
Robert Kraft 3138 127 7 0.04047164 10 0.00223072 3 0.05511811 2 15
William Mathews 2264 91 18 0.04019435 7 0.00795053 15 0.1978022 16 38

William Morrissey 3032 121 22 0.03990765 6 0.007255937 14 0.18181818 14 34

Norbert Nadel 2959 131 20 0.04427171 13 0.00675904 13 0.15267176 12 38

Arthur Ney, Jr. 3219 125 14 0.03883194 5 0.004349177 9 0.112 8 22

Richard Niehaus 3353 137 16 0.04085893 11 0.004771846 10 0.11678832 10 31

Thomas Nurre 3000 121 6 0.04033333 8 0.002 2 0.04958678 1 11

John O'Connor 2969 129 12 0.04344897 12 0.004041765 7 0.09302326 6 25

Robert Ruehlman 3205 145 18 0.04524181 15 0.005616225 11 0.12413793 11 37

J.Howard Sundermann 955 60 10 0.06282723 16 0.010471204 16 0.16666667 13 45

Ann Marie Tracey 3141 127 13 0.04043298 9 0.004138809 8 0.1023622 7 24

Ralph Winkler 3089 88 6 0.02848818 1 0.001942376 1 0.06818182 3 5

Here the judge Thomas Nurre is the most

efficient as the probability of reversal
is just 0.049.

Domestic
Relations Court

Total Probability of
Appeal Revers Probability of Probability of
cases Ran Ran reversal Ran Total
Judges ed ed cases being cases being
dispose k k given an k rank
cases cases appealed reversed
d appeal

Penelope Cunningham 2729 7 1 0.002565042 2 0.000366435 2 0.142857143 2 6

Patrick Dinkelacker 6001 19 4 0.003166139 3 0.000666556 3 0.210526316 4 10

Deborah Gaines 8799 48 9 0.005455165 4 0.001022844 4 0.1875 3 11

Ronald Panioto 12970 32 3 0.002467232 1 0.000231303 1 0.09375 1 3

In the Domestic Relations court Ronald
Panioto is considered to be the most
efficient with the Probability of 0.093
for the case to be reversed

Municipal
court

Total Probability Probability Probability Tot

Appe Rever
cases of cases Ran of cases Ran of reversal Ran al
Judges aled sed
dispos being k being k given an k ran
cases cases
ed appealed reversed appeal k

Mike Allen 6149 43 4 0.006993 20 0.00065051 7 0.09302326 4 31

Nadine Allen 7812 34 6 0.0043523 9 0.00076805 11 0.17647059 10 30

Timothy Black 7954 41 6 0.0051546 12 0.00075434 10 0.14634146 6 28

David Davis 7736 43 5 0.0055584 15 0.00064633 6 0.11627907 5 26

Leslie Isaiah Gaines 5282 35 13 0.0066263 19 0.00246119 20 0.37142857 18 57

Karla Grandy 5253 6 0 0.0011422 1 0 1 0 1 3

Deidra Hair 2522 5 0 0.0019826 3 0 1 0 1 5

Dennis Helmick 7900 29 5 0.0036709 6 0.00063291 5 0.17241379 9 20

Timothy Hogan 2308 13 2 0.0056326 17 0.00086655 13 0.15384615 7 37

James Patrick Kenney 2798 6 1 0.0021444 4 0.0003574 4 0.16666667 8 16

Joseph Luebbers 4698 25 8 0.0053214 14 0.00170285 18 0.32 16 48

William Mallory 8277 38 9 0.004591 11 0.00108735 14 0.23684211 14 39

Melba Marsh 8219 34 7 0.0041368 8 0.00085169 12 0.20588235 13 33

Beth Mattingly 2971 13 1 0.0043756 10 0.00033659 3 0.07692308 3 16

Albert Mestemaker 4975 28 9 0.0056281 16 0.00180905 19 0.32142857 17 52

Mark Painter 2239 7 3 0.0031264 5 0.00133988 16 0.42857143 19 40

Jack Rosen 7790 41 13 0.0052632 13 0.00166881 17 0.31707317 15 45

Mark Schweikert 5403 33 6 0.0061077 18 0.00111049 15 0.18181818 11 44

David Stockdale 5371 22 4 0.0040961 7 0.00074474 9 0.18181818 11 27

John A.West 2797 4 2 0.0014301 2 0.00071505 8 0.5 20 30

In the municipal court the judges Karla

Grandy and Deidra Hair are considered
to be the most efficient with the
corresponding probabilities of 0 for the case to
be reversed.

akshitaakhil.blogspot.com/2016/07/managerial-report-on-hamilton-county.html 2/3
10/14/22, 6:24 PM Akshita Akhil: Managerial Report on Hamilton County Judge Case Analysis

Conclusion

So the above case study analysis gives the

probability of cases being appealed
and reversed in three different courts,
probability of a case being appealed for
each judge, probability of a case
being reversed for each judge, probability of
reversal given an appeal for each
judge and rank of all the judges.

Posted by
Unknown
at
01:53

2 comments:

StevenHWicker 22 March 2019 at 19:50

Hello, an amazing Information dude. Thanks for sharing this nice information with us.
Implementation plan for organization

Reply

donnaj edwards 4 July 2021 at 09:18

Thanks for this. I really like what you've posted here and wish you the best of luck with this blog
and thanks for sharing. Gordon Engle

Reply

To leave a comment, click the button below to sign in with Google.

SIGN IN WITH GOOGLE

Newer Post Home Older Post

Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.

akshitaakhil.blogspot.com/2016/07/managerial-report-on-hamilton-county.html 3/3