MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge of (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and content within and observer agreement form/s done
Pedagogy across curriculum through onsite / face-to-face / in-
teaching areas. person classroom observation.
(PPST 1.1.2)
If onsite / face-to-face / in-
person classes are not
implemented,

● through observation of Efficiency

synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range Classroom Observation Tool
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services strategies that observer agreement form/s done
enhance learner through onsite / face-to-face / in- Quality
achievement in person classroom observation.
literacy and
numeracy skills. If onsite / face-to-face / in-
(PPST 1.4.2) person classes are not
implemented, Efficiency

● through observation of
synchronous / Timeliness
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Basic 3. Applied a range Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services strategies to observer agreement form/s done
develop critical through onsite / face-to-face / in-
and creative person classroom observation.
thinking, as well
as other higher- If onsite / face-to-face / in-
order thinking person classes are not Efficiency
skills. (PPST implemented,
1.5.2)
● through observation
of synchronous /
asynchronous Timeliness
teaching in other
modalities; or
● through observation
of a demonstration
teaching* via LAC
session
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Environment classroom (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and Diversity structure to observer agreement form/s done
of Learners engage learners, through onsite / face-to-face / in-
individually or in person classroom observation.
groups, in
meaningful If onsite / face-to-face / in-
exploration, person classes are not Efficiency
discovery and implemented,
hands-on
activities within a
● through observation of
range of physical
learning synchronous /
environments. asynchronous teaching in
(PPST 2.3.3) other modalities; or
Timeliness
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session.
Basic 5. Managed Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education learner behavior (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form/s done
applying positive through onsite / face-to-face / in-
and non-violent person classroom observation.
discipline to
ensure learning- If onsite / face-to-face / in-
focused person classes are not
environments. implemented, Efficiency
(PPST 2.6.2)
● through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 6. Used Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education differentiated, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services developmentally observer agreement form/s done
appropriate through onsite / face-to-face / in-
learning person classroom observation.
experiences to
address learners’ If onsite / face-to-face / in-
gender, needs, person classes are not
strengths, implemented,
interests and
experiences. Efficiency
● through observation of
(PPST 3.1.2)
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC session. Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services implemented observer agreement form/s done
developmentally through onsite / face-to-face / in-
sequenced person classroom observation.
teaching and
learning If onsite / face-to-face / in-
processes to person classes are not
meet curriculum implemented,
requirements and
varied teaching
● through observation of
contexts. (PPST Efficiency
4.1.2) synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session. Timeliness
8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
collegial LAC sessions / FGDs /
discussions that meetings / other
use teacher and collegial discussions
learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC
to enrich teaching sessions / FGDs /
practice. (PPST meetings / other Efficiency
4.4.2) collegial discussions on
use of teacher and
learner feedback to
enrich teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their Timeliness
demonstration of
teaching practices
following participation
from LAC sessions /
FGDs / meetings / other
collegial discussions
that use teacher and
learner feedback to
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
enrich teaching practice,
with proof/s of
attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective)
Basic 9. Selected, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education developed, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services organized and observer agreement form/s done
used appropriate through onsite / face-to-face / in-
teaching and person classroom observation.
learning
resources, If onsite / face-to-face / in-
including ICT, to person classes are not
address learning implemented, Efficiency
goals.
(PPST 4.5.2)
● through observation of
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Assessment selected, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and organized and observer agreement form/s done
Reporting used diagnostic, through onsite / face-to-face / in-
formative and person classroom observation.
summative
assessment If onsite / face-to-face / in-
strategies person classes are not
consistent with implemented,
curriculum
requirements.
● through observation of
(PPST 5.1.2)
synchronous /
asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
● through observation of a
demonstration teaching*
via LAC session.

Efficiency

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the Quality
Education evaluated learner following:
Services progress and
● Individual Learning
achievement
using learner Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
attainment data. ● Peer assessment data
(PPST 5.2.2) ● Sample of learners’ output
with reflection / self-
assessment
● Progress charts/anecdotal Efficiency
records
● Class/e-class
record/grading sheets
● Lesson plans showing
index of mastery
● Frequency of errors with
identified least/most
mastered skills
Timeliness
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
(e.g., Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
● Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 12. Any one (1) of the Quality
Education Communicated following:
Services promptly and
● A sample of corrected test
clearly the
learners’ needs, paper of a learner in a
progress and learning area with parent’s
achievement to or guardian’s signature and
key stakeholders, date of receipt
including ● Minutes of meetings with Efficiency
parents/guardians
key stakeholders (e.g., PTA,
(PPST 5.4.2)
SGC, SPT, CPC) with proof
of attendance
● Report card with parent’s
or guardian’s signature in all
quarters supported by
minutes of meeting
● Communication with key
stakeholders (e.g.,
parents/guardians, co- Timeliness
teachers, LGU) using
various modalities
● Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
● Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
● Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
5. Personal 13. Applied a A reflection/journal entry Quality
Growth and personal that highlights the
Professional philosophy of application of a learner-
Development
teaching that is centered teaching
Efficiency
learner- philosophy in the lesson
centered. plan or community work
(PPST 7.1.2)
14. Set 1. Certification from the ICT Quality
professional Coordinator / School Head /
development Focal Person in charge of e-
goals based on SAT Efficiency
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
Standards for (MRF) Timeliness
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from
(PPST 7.5.2) Phase II
Basic Plus Factor 15. Performed Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education various related ● committee involvement;
Services works / ● involvement as
activities that module/learning material
contribute to writer/validator;
the teaching- ● involvement as a
learning
resource
process
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in in the
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
RO/SDO/school-initiated Efficiency
TV/radio-based instruction;
● book or journal
authorship/
co-authorship/contributors
hip;
●
advisorship/coordinatorshi
p/ chairpersonship; Timeliness
● participation in
demonstration teaching;
● participation as research
presenter in a
forum/conference;
● mentoring of pre-
service/in-service
teachers;
● conducted research
within the rating period;
● others (please specify)

1. with annotation on how it

contributed to the
teaching-learning process.
Rater Ratee Approving Authority