12.07.2022 Author: F.
William Engdahl
Toxicology vs Virology: Rockefeller Institute and the Criminal Polio Fraud
Toxicology vs Virology: Rockefeller Institute and the Toksikologija protiv virologije: Rockefeller Institut i
Criminal Polio Fraud kriminalna prijevara s dječjom paralizom
One of the outcomes of the alleged new SARS Covid
virus that publicly emerged in 2019 is that the medical
specialization of virology has been raised to a stature
almost Godlike in the media. Few understand the origins
of virology and its elevation into a leading role in
today’s medicine practice. For this we need to look at
the origins and politics of America’s first medical
research institute, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical
Research, today Rockefeller University, and their work
on what they claimed was a polio virus.
In 1907 an outbreak of a sickness in New York City
gave the director of the Rockefeller Institute, Simon
Flexner, MD, a golden opportunity to lay claim to
discovery of an invisible “virus” caused by what was
arbitrarily called poliomyelitis. The word poliomyelitis
simply means inflammation of the spinal cord’s grey
matter. There were some 2,500 New Yorkers, mostly
children, designated with some form of poliomyelitis,
including paralysis and even death, that year.
Flexner’s Fraud
The most striking aspect of the entire polio saga in the
USA during the first half of the 20th Century was the
fact that every key phase of the business was controlled
by people tied to what became the Rockefeller medical
cabal. This fraud started with claims by the Director of
the Rockefeller Institute, Simon Flexner, that he and his
colleague, Paul A. Lewis, had “isolated” a pathogen,
invisible to the eye, smaller even than bacteria, which
they claimed caused the paralyzing sickness in a series
of outbreaks in the US. How did they come to this idea?
In a paper published in 1909 in the Journal of the
American Medical Association, Flexner claimed he and
Lewis had isolated the poliomyelitis virus responsible.
He reported they had successfully “passaged”
poliomyelitis through several monkeys, from monkey to
monkey. They began by injecting diseased human spinal
cord tissue of a young boy who had died, presumably
from the virus, into the brains of monkeys. After a
monkey fell ill, a suspension of its diseased spinal cord
tissue was injected into the brains of other monkeys who
also fell ill.
They proclaimed that the Rockefeller Institute doctors
Jedan od ishoda navodnog novog virusa SARS Covid
koji se javno pojavio 2019. jest taj da je medicinska
specijalizacija virologije u medijima podignuta na razinu
gotovo božansku. Malo njih razumije podrijetlo
virologije i njezino uzdizanje u vodeću ulogu u današnjoj
medicinskoj praksi. Za ovo moramo pogledati podrijetlo i
politiku prvog američkog medicinskog istraživačkog
instituta, Instituta za medicinska istraživanja Rockefeller,
današnjeg Sveučilišta Rockefeller, i njihov rad na onome
za što su tvrdili da je virus dječje paralize.
Godine 1907. izbijanje bolesti u New Yorku dalo je
direktoru Instituta Rockefeller, dr. med. Simonu
Flexneru, zlatnu priliku da polaže pravo na otkriće
nevidljivog "virusa" uzrokovanog onim što je proizvoljno
nazvano poliomijelitis. Riječ poliomijelitis jednostavno
znači upala sive tvari leđne moždine. Bilo je oko 2500
Njujorčana, većinom djece, označenih s nekim oblikom
poliomijelitisa, uključujući paralizu, pa čak i smrt, te
godine.
Flexnerova prijevara
Najupečatljiviji aspekt cijele sage o dječjoj paralizi u
SAD-u tijekom prve polovice 20. stoljeća bila je
činjenica da su svaku ključnu fazu poslovanja kontrolirali
ljudi povezani s onim što je postalo Rockefellerova
medicinska kabala. Ova prijevara započela je tvrdnjama
direktora Rockefeller instituta Simona Flexnera da su on
i njegov kolega Paul A. Lewis "izolirali" patogena, oku
nevidljivog, manjeg čak i od bakterije, za kojeg su tvrdili
da uzrokuje paralizu bolesti u nizu izbijanja u SAD-u.
Kako su došli na ovu ideju?
U radu objavljenom 1909. u časopisu Američkog
medicinskog udruženja, Flexner je tvrdio da su on i
Lewis izolirali odgovorni virus poliomijelitisa. Izvijestio
je da su uspješno "prenijeli" poliomijelitis kroz nekoliko
majmuna, od majmuna do majmuna. Počeli su
ubrizgavanjem bolesnog tkiva ljudske leđne moždine
dječaka koji je umro, vjerojatno od virusa, u mozgove
majmuna. Nakon što se majmun razbolio, suspenzija
njegovog oboljelog tkiva leđne moždine ubrizgana je u
mozgove drugih majmuna koji su se također razboljeli.
had thus proven poliomyelitis virus causality for the
mysterious disease. They hadn’t done anything of the
sort. Flexner and Lewis even admitted that: “We failed
utterly to discover bacteria, either in film preparations or
in cultures, that could account for the disease; and, since
among our long series of propagations of the virus in
monkeys not one animal showed, in the lesions, the
cocci described by some previous investigators, and we
had failed to obtain any such bacteria from the human
material studied by us, we felt that they could be
excluded from consideration.” What they then did was
to make a bizarre supposition, a leap of faith, not a
scientific claim. They took their hypothesis of viral
exogenous agency and made it fact, with no proof
whatever. They asserted: “Therefore, …the infecting
agent of epidemic poliomyelitis belongs to the class of
the minute and filterable viruses that have not thus far
been demonstrated with certainty under the
microscope.“ Therefore?
Proglasili su da su liječnici s Instituta Rockefeller time
dokazali uzročnost virusa poliomijelitisa za misterioznu
bolest. Nisu učinili ništa slično. Flexner i Lewis su čak
priznali da: “U potpunosti nismo uspjeli otkriti bakterije,
bilo u filmskim preparatima ili u kulturama, koje bi
mogle objasniti bolest; i budući da među našim dugim
serijama razmnožavanja virusa u majmunima nijedna
životinja nije pokazala, u lezijama, koke opisane od
strane nekih prethodnih istraživača, a mi nismo uspjeli
dobiti nijednu takvu bakteriju iz ljudskog materijala koji
smo proučavali, osjećali smo da bi mogli biti isključeni iz
razmatranja.” Ono što su tada učinili bila je bizarna
pretpostavka, skok vjere, a ne znanstvena tvrdnja. Uzeli
su svoju hipotezu o virusnom egzogenom utjecaju i
učinili je činjenicom, bez ikakvih dokaza. Oniustvrdio
je : “ Stoga, …uzročnik epidemijskog poliomijelitisa
pripada klasi sićušnih virusa koji se mogu filtrirati koji
do sada nisu sa sigurnošću dokazani pod mikroskopom.
“Stoga?

Simon Flexner simply asserted it “must” be a polio virus
killing the monkeys, because they could find no other
explanation. In fact he did not look for another source of
the illnesses. This was not scientific isolation. It was
wild speculation: “…not thus far been demonstrated
with certainty under the microscope.” They admitted
this in a December 18, 1909 follow up in JAMA, titled,
THE NATURE OF THE VIRUS OF EPIDEMIC
POLIOMYELITIS.
Simon Flexner jednostavno je ustvrdio da "mora" biti
virus dječje paralize koji ubija majmune, jer nisu mogli
pronaći drugo objašnjenje. Zapravo nije tražio drugi
izvor bolesti. Ovo nije bila znanstvena izolacija. Bilo je
to divlje nagađanje: "...do sada nije sa sigurnošću
dokazano pod mikroskopom." Priznali su to u nastavku
istraživanja u JAMA-i od 18. prosinca 1909., pod
naslovom PRIRODA VIRUSA EPIDEMIJSKOG
POLIOMIJElitisa.

The so-called “virus” they were injecting into monkeys

was hardly pure. It also contained an undetermined
amount of contaminants. It included “pureed spinal Takozvani “virus” koji su ubrizgavali u majmune jedva
cord, brain, fecal matter, even flies were ground up andda je bio čist. Također je sadržavao neodređenu količinu
injected into monkeys to induce paralysis.” Until Jonas kontaminanata. Uključivao je "pročišćenu leđnu
Salk won approval from the US Government in April moždinu, mozak, fekalne tvari, čak su i muhe mljevene i
1955 for a polio vaccine, no scientific proof of existence
ubrizgavane u majmune kako bi izazvale paralizu." Sve
of a virus causing poliomyelitis, or infantile paralysis as
dok Jonas Salk u travnju 1955. nije dobio odobrenje
it was commonly known, had been proven. That is the vlade SAD-a za cjepivo protiv dječje paralize, nije bio
case to this day. The medical world all took Flexner’s dokazan nikakav znanstveni dokaz o postojanju virusa
word that it “must” be a virus. koji uzrokuje poliomijelitis ili dječju paralizu, kako je to
uobičajeno poznato. Tako je do danas. Cijeli je
Rockefeller Institute, Flexner and the American Medical medicinski svijet vjerovao Flexnerovoj riječi da to “
Association mora ” biti virus.

The Rockefeller Institute was founded from the
Standard Oil fortune of John D. Rockefeller in 1901, to
be America’s first biomedical institute. It was modelled
on France’s Pasteur Institute (1888) and Germany’s
Robert Koch Institute (1891). Its first Director, Simon
Flexner, played a pivotal and most criminal role in the
evolution of what became approved American medical
practice. The Rockefeller goal was to completely
Rockefeller Institute, Flexner i American Medical
Association
Rockefellerov institut osnovan je iz bogatstva Standard
Oila Johna D. Rockefellera 1901. godine, kao prvi
američki biomedicinski institut. Napravljen je po uzoru
na francuski Institut Pasteur (1888.) i njemački Institut
Robert Koch (1891.). Njegov prvi direktor, Simon
control American medical practice and transform it into Flexner, odigrao je ključnu i najkriminalniju ulogu u
an instrument, at least initially, for promotion of evoluciji onoga što je postalo priznata američka
medical drugs approved by the Rockefeller interests. By medicinska praksa. Rockefellerov je cilj bio potpuno
then they were looking to monopolize medical drugs kontrolirati američku medicinsku praksu i pretvoriti je u
produced from their petroleum refining, as they had instrument, barem u početku, za promicanje medicinskih
done with oil. lijekova odobrenih od interesa Rockefellera. Do tada su
željeli monopolizirati medicinske lijekove proizvedene
As Rockefeller Institute head, Simon Flexner, was njihovom preradom nafte, kao što su učinili s naftom.
publishing his inconclusive but highly acclaimed studies
on polio, he arranged for his brother, Abraham Flexner, Dok je voditelj Rockefeller Instituta, Simon Flexner,
a school teacher with no medical background, to head a objavljivao svoje neuvjerljive, ali vrlo hvaljene studije o
joint study by the American Medical Association dječjoj paralizi, sredio je svog brata, Abrahama Flexnera,
(AMA), the Rockefeller General Education Board, and školskog učitelja bez medicinskog obrazovanja, da vodi
the Carnegie Foundation founded by Rockefeller’s close zajedničku studiju Američkog medicinskog udruženja
friend Andrew Carnegie. (AMA), Rockefellerov odbor za opće obrazovanje i
Zaklada Carnegie koju je osnovao Rockefellerov bliski
The 1910 study was titled, The Flexner Report, and its prijatelj Andrew Carnegie.
ostensible purpose was to investigate the quality of all
US medical schools. The outcome of the report was, Studija iz 1910. nazvana je Flexnerovo izvješće, a
however, predetermined. Ties between the well- njezina navodna svrha bila je istražiti kvalitetu svih
endowed Rockefeller Institute and the AMA went američkih medicinskih škola. Ishod izvješća je, međutim,
through the corrupt AMA head, George H. Simmons. bio unaprijed određen. Veze između dobro opskrbljenog
Rockefeller Instituta i AMA-e išle su preko
Simmons was also the editor of the influential Journal of korumpiranog šefa AMA-e, Georgea H. Simmonsa.
the American Medical Association, a publication
delivered to some 80,000 doctors across America. He Simmons je također bio urednik utjecajnog časopisa
reportedly wielded absolute power over the doctors’ Journal of the American Medical Association,
association. He controlled the rising ad revenues for publikacije koja se isporučuje oko 80.000 liječnika
drug companies to promote their drugs to AMA doctors diljem Amerike. Navodno je imao apsolutnu moć nad
in his journal, a highly lucrative business. He was a key udrugom liječnika. Kontrolirao je rastuće prihode od
part of the Rockefeller medical coup that was to oglasa za farmaceutske tvrtke kako bi promovirale svoje
completely redefine acceptable medical practice away lijekove liječnicima AMA u svom časopisu, što je bio
from remedial or preventive treatment to use of often vrlo unosan posao. Bio je ključni dio Rockefellerovog
deadly drugs and expensive surgeries. As head of the medicinskog udara koji je trebao u potpunosti redefinirati
AMA Simmons realized that the competition from a prihvatljivu medicinsku praksu od ljekovitog ili
proliferation of medical schools, including then- preventivnog liječenja do upotrebe često smrtonosnih
recognized chiropractic, osteopathy, homeopathy and lijekova i skupih operacija. Kao šef AMA-e, Simmons je
natural medicine, was lessening income of his AMA shvatio da konkurencija iz sve većeg broja medicinskih
doctors, as the number of medical schools had increased škola, uključujući tada priznatu kiropraktiku, osteopatiju,
from around 90 in 1880 to over 150 in 1903. homeopatiju i prirodnu medicinu, smanjuje prihod
njegovih liječnika iz AMA-e,
Abraham Flexner, former headmaster of a private
school, toured various US medical schools in 1909 and Abraham Flexner, bivši ravnatelj privatne škole, obišao
recommended that fully half of the 165 medical schools je razne medicinske škole u SAD-u 1909. godine i
be closed, as what he defined as “sub-standard.” This preporučio da se potpuno zatvori polovica od 165
reduced competition from other approaches to healing medicinskih škola, što je on definirao kao "ispod
diseases. They ruthlessly targeted then-widespread standarda". Ovo je smanjilo konkurenciju drugih pristupa
naturopathic medical schools, chiropractic ones, liječenju bolesti. Nemilosrdno su ciljali tada raširene
osteopaths as well as independent allopathic schools naturopatske medicinske škole, kiropraktičare, osteopate
unwilling to join the AMA regime. Then Rockefeller kao i neovisne alopatske škole koje se nisu htjele
money went to the select schools with a proviso that pridružiti AMA režimu. Tada je Rockefellerov novac
professors be vetted by the Rockefeller Institute and the otišao odabranim školama uz uvjet da profesore
curriculum focus on drugs and surgery as treatment, not provjerava Rockefellerov institut i da se nastavni plan i
prevention, nor nutrition, nor toxicology as possible program usredotočuje na lijekove i kirurgiju kao
causes and solutions. They had to accept Pasteur’s germ liječenje, a ne na prevenciju, ni prehranu, ni toksikologiju
theory of disease, which claims one germ to one disease kao moguće uzroke i rješenja. Morali su prihvatiti
reductionism. Rockefeller-controlled media launched a Pasteurovu teoriju bolesti o klicama, koja tvrdi
coordinated witch-hunt against all forms of alternative redukcionizam jedna klica na jednu bolest .Mediji pod
medicine, herbal remedies, natural vitamins and kontrolom Rockefellera pokrenuli su koordinirani lov na
chiropractic–anything not controlled by Rockefeller vještice protiv svih oblika alternativne medicine, biljnih
patented drugs. lijekova, prirodnih vitamina i kiropraktike – svega što
nije kontrolirano patentiranim lijekovima Rockefellera.
By 1919 the Rockefeller General Education Board and
the Rockefeller Foundation had paid out more than
$5,000,000 to Johns Hopkins, Yale and Washington
University in St. Louis medical schools. In 1919 John Do 1919. Rockefeller General Education Board i
D. Rockefeller granted another $20,000,000 in Rockefeller Foundation isplatili su više od 5.000.000$
securities, “for the advancement of medical education in medicinskim školama Johns Hopkins, Yale i Washington
the United States.” That would be comparable to about u St. Louisu. Godine 1919. John D. Rockefeller dodijelio
$340 million today, a huge sum. In short the Rockefeller je još 20.000.000$ u vrijednosnim papirima, “za
money interests had hijacked American medical unaprjeđenje medicinskog obrazovanja u Sjedinjenim
education and medical research by the 1920’s. Državama”. To bi bilo usporedivo s oko 340 milijuna
dolara danas, golema svota. Ukratko, Rockefellerovi
Creating Virology novčani interesi oteli su američko medicinsko
obrazovanje i medicinska istraživanja do 1920-ih.
This medical takeover, backed by the most influential
doctors’ organization, the AMA, and its corrupt head, Stvaranje virusologije
Simmons, allowed Simon Flexner to literally create
modern virology under Rockefeller rules. The highly Ovo medicinsko preuzimanje, potpomognuto
controversial Thomas Milton Rivers, as director of The najutjecajnijom liječničkom organizacijom, AMA, i
Rockefeller Institute’s virology laboratory, established njezinim korumpiranim šefom, Simmonsom, omogućilo
virology as an independent field, separate from je Simonu Flexneru da doslovno stvori modernu
bacteriology, during the 1920s. They realized they could virologiju prema Rockefellerovim pravilima .Vrlo
manipulate far easier when they could claim deadly kontroverzni Thomas Milton Rivers, kao direktor
pathogens that were invisible germs or “viruses.” virološkog laboratorija Instituta Rockefeller, uspostavio
Ironically virus comes from Latin for poison. je virologiju kao neovisno područje, odvojeno od
bakteriologije, tijekom 1920-ih. Shvatili su da mogu
Virology, a reductionist medical fraud, was a creation of puno lakše manipulirati kada mogu tvrditi da su
the Rockefeller medical cabal. That highly important smrtonosni patogeni nevidljive klice ili " virusi
fact is buried in the annals of medicine today. Diseases ".Ironično, virus dolazi od latinskog za otrov.
such as smallpox or measles or poliomyelitis were
declared caused by invisible pathogens called specific Virologija, redukcionistička medicinska prijevara, bila je
viruses. If scientists could “isolate” the invisible virus, kreacija Rockefellerove medicinske kabale. Ta vrlo
theoretically they could find vaccines to protect people važna činjenica danas je zakopana u analima medicine.
from harm. So their theory went. It was a huge boon for Bolesti poput malih boginja ili ospica ili poliomijelitisa
the Rockefeller cartel of pharmaceutical companies, proglašene su uzrokovanima nevidljivim patogenima koji
which at the time included American Home Products se nazivaju specifičnim virusima. Kad bi znanstvenici
which falsely promoted drugs with no proof of effect, mogli "izolirati" nevidljivi virus, teoretski bi mogli
such as Preparation H for Hemorrhoids, or Advil for pronaći cjepiva koja bi zaštitila ljude od zla. Tako je
pain relief; Sterling Drug,which took over the US assets krenula njihova teorija. Bila je to velika blagodat za
including Aspirin of German Bayer AG after World Rockefellerov kartel farmaceutskih kompanija, koji je u
War I; Winthrop Chemical; American Cyanamid and its to vrijeme uključivao American Home Products koji je
subsidiary Lederle Laboratories; Squibb and Monsanto. lažno promovirao lijekove bez dokaza o učinku, poput
pripravka H za hemoroide ili Advila za ublažavanje
bolova; Sterling Drug, koji je nakon Prvog svjetskog rata
preuzeo američku imovinu uključujući Aspirin
Soon virus researchers at the Rockefeller Institute, in
addition to claiming discovery of the poliomyelitis
virus, claimed to discover the viruses that caused
smallpox, mumps, measles and yellow fever. Then they
announced “discovery” of preventive vaccines for
pneumonia and yellow fever. All of these “discoveries”
announced by the Institute proved false. With the
control of the research in the new area of virology, the
Rockefeller Institute, in collusion with Simmons at
AMA and his equally corrupt successor, Morris
Fishbein, could promote new patented vaccines or drug
“remedies” in the influential AMA journal that went to
every member doctor in America. Drug companies
refusing to pay for ads in the AMA journal were
blackballed by the AMA.
Controlling Polio Research
Simon Flexner and the highly-influential Rockefeller
Institute succeeded in 1911 in having the symptoms that
were being called poliomyelitis to be entered into the
US Public Health Law as a “contagious, infectious
disease caused by an air-borne virus.” Yet even they
admitted they had not proven how the disease enters the
body of humans. As one experienced doctor pointed out
in a medical journal in 1911, “Our present knowledge of
the possible methods of contagion is based almost
entirely upon the work done in this city at the
Rockefeller Institute.” In 1951 Dr. Ralph Scobey, a
critic of the Rockefeller rush to judgment on polio
contagion, noted, “This of course placed reliance on
animal experiments rather than on clinical
investigations…” Scobey also pointed to the lack of
proof poliomyelitis was contagious: “…children
afflicted with the disease were kept in general hospital
wards and that not a single one of the other inmates of
the wards of the hospital was affected with the disease.”
The general attitude at that time was summed up in
1911: “It seems to us despite the lack of absolute proof,
that the best interests of the community would be
conserved by our regarding the disease from a
contagious standpoint.” (sic).
By having poliomyelitis symptoms classified as a highly
contagious disease caused by an invisible, alleged
exogenous or external virus, the Rockefeller Institute
and the AMA were able to cut off any serious research
for alternative explanations such as exposure to
chemical pesticides or other toxins, to explain the
seasonal outbreaks of illness and paralysis, even death,
mostly in very young children. That was to have fatal
njemačkog Bayer AG; Winthrop Chemical; American
Cyanamid i njegova podružnica Lederle Laboratories;
Ubrzo su istraživači virusa na Rockefeller institutu, osim
što su tvrdili da su otkrili virus poliomijelitisa, tvrdili da
su otkrili viruse koji su uzročnici malih boginja,
zaušnjaka, ospica i žute groznice. Tada su najavili
“otkriće” preventivnih cjepiva za upalu pluća i žutu
groznicu. Sva ova “otkrića” koja je objavio Institut
pokazala su se lažnima. S kontrolom istraživanja u
novom području virologije, Institut Rockefeller, u
dogovoru sa Simmonsom iz AMA-e i njegovim jednako
korumpiranim nasljednikom, Morrisom Fishbeinom,
mogao je promovirati nova patentirana cjepiva ili
"lijekove" za lijekove u utjecajnom časopisu AMA-e koji
je otišao na svaki liječnik član u Americi. Tvrtke za
lijekove koje su odbile platiti za oglase u časopisu AMA
bile su na crno od strane AMA-e.
Kontroliranje poliomijelitisa
Simon Flexner i vrlo utjecajni Institut Rockefeller uspjeli
su 1911. godine postići da se simptomi koji su nazivani
poliomijelitisom unesu u Zakon o javnom zdravstvu
SAD-a kao “zarazna, zarazna bolest koju uzrokuje virus
koji se prenosi zrakom”. Ipak, ni oni su priznali da nisu
dokazali kako bolest ulazi u tijelo čovjeka. Kao što je
jedan iskusni liječnik istaknuo u medicinskom časopisu
1911. godine, “Naše sadašnje znanje o mogućim
metodama zaraze temelji se gotovo u potpunosti na radu
obavljenom u ovom gradu na Rockefeller institutu.”
Godine 1951. dr. Ralph Scobey, kritičar Rockefellerove
žurbe s prosudbom o zarazi poliomijelitisa, primijetio je:
"Ovo se naravno oslanjalo na pokuse na životinjama, a ne
na klinička istraživanja..." Scobey je također ukazao na
nedostatak dokaza da je poliomijelitis zarazan: “…djeca
oboljela od te bolesti držana su na odjelima općih bolnica
i da niti jedan drugi štićenik bolničkih odjela nije obolio
od te bolesti.” Opći stav u to vrijeme sažeo je 1911.:
“Čini nam se, unatoč nedostatku apsolutnih dokaza, da bi
najbolji interesi zajednice bili očuvani našim odnosom
prema bolesti odzarazno stajalište. ”(sic).
Budući da su simptomi poliomijelitisa klasificirani kao
vrlo zarazna bolest uzrokovana nevidljivim, navodno
egzogenim ili vanjskim virusom, Institut Rockefeller i
AMA uspjeli su prekinuti bilo kakva ozbiljna istraživanja
za alternativna objašnjenja kao što je izloženost
kemijskim pesticidima ili drugim toksinima, kako bi
objasnili sezonska izbijanja bolesti i paralize, čak i smrti,
uglavnom kod vrlo male djece. To je imalo kobne
posljedice koje traju do danas.
consequences lasting to the present.
Enter DDT
In his 1952 statement to the US House of
Representatives investigating the possible dangers of
chemicals in food products, Ralph R. Scobey, M.D.
noted, “For almost half a century poliomyelitis
investigations have been directed towards a supposed
exogenous virus that enters the human body to cause the
disease. The manner in which the Public Health Law is
now stated, imposes only this type of investigation. No
intensive studies have been made, on the other hand, to
determine whether or not the so-called virus of
poliomyelitis is an autochthonous chemical substance
that does not enter the human body at all, but simply
results from an exogenous factor or factors, for
example, a food poison.” Toxins as cause were not
investigated, despite huge evidence.
During the 1930s with economic depression and then
war, few new major outbreaks of poliomyelitis were
noted. However, immediately after the end of World
War II, notably, the polio drama exploded in dimension.
Beginning 1945, every summer more and more children
across America were diagnosed with poliomyelitis and
hospitalized. Less than 1% of the cases were actually
tested via blood or urine tests. Some 99% were
diagnosed by merely the presence of symptoms such as
acute pain in extremities, fever, upset stomach, diarrhea.
In 1938, with the support of presumed polio victim,
Franklin D. Roosevelt, the National Foundation for
Infantile Paralysis (March of Dimes) was founded to
solicit tax-exempt donations to fund polio research. A
German doctor and researcher, Dr Henry Kumm, came
to the US and joined the Rockefeller Institute in 1928
where he stayed until joining the National Foundation in
1951 as Director of Polio Research. Kumm was joined
at the National Foundation by another key Rockefeller
Institute veteran, the so-called “father of virology,”
Thomas M. Rivers, who chaired the foundation’s
vaccine research advisory committee overseeing the
research of Jonas Salk. These two Rockefeller Institute
key figures thus controlled funds for polio research
including developing a vaccine.
During the Second World War, while still at Rockefeller
Institute, Henry Kumm was a consultant to the US
Army where he oversaw field studies in Italy. There
Kumm directed field studies for the use of DDT against
typhus and malarial mosquitoes in the marshes near
Rome and Naples. DDT had been patented as an
Unesite DDT
U svojoj izjavi iz 1952. Zastupničkom domu Kongresa
SAD-a istražujući moguće opasnosti od kemikalija u
prehrambenim proizvodima, dr. med. Ralph R. Scobey
istaknuo je: „Gotovo pola stoljeća istraživanja
poliomijelitisa bila su usmjerena prema navodnom
egzogenom virusu koji ulazi u ljudsko tijelo kako bi
izazvati bolest. Način na koji sada glasi Zakon o javnom
zdravstvu nameće samo ovu vrstu istraživanja. S druge
strane, nisu provedena intenzivna istraživanja koja bi
utvrdila je li tzv. virus poliomijelitisa autohtona kemijska
tvar koja uopće ne ulazi u ljudsko tijelo, već jednostavno
nastaje od egzogenog čimbenika ili čimbenika, tj. na
primjer, otrov u hrani .”Toksini kao uzrok nisu istraženi,
unatoč ogromnim dokazima.
Tijekom 1930-ih s ekonomskom depresijom, a potom i
ratom, zabilježeno je nekoliko novih većih izbijanja
poliomijelitisa. Međutim, neposredno nakon završetka
Drugog svjetskog rata drama o dječjoj paralizi
eksplodirala je u razmjerima. Početkom 1945., svakog
ljeta sve više i više djece diljem Amerike dobivalo je
dijagnozu poliomijelitisa i hospitalizirano. Manje od 1%
slučajeva zapravo je testirano putem testova krvi ili
urina. Otprilike 99% dijagnosticirano je jednostavnom
prisutnošću simptoma kao što su akutna bol u
ekstremitetima, vrućica, želučane tegobe, proljev.
Godine 1938., uz potporu pretpostavljene žrtve dječje
paralize, Franklina D. Roosevelta, osnovana je
Nacionalna zaklada za dječju paralizu (March of Dimes)
za prikupljanje donacija oslobođenih plaćanja poreza za
financiranje istraživanja dječje paralize. Njemački
liječnik i istraživač, dr. Henry Kumm, došao je u SAD i
pridružio se Institutu Rockefeller 1928. gdje je ostao sve
do pridruživanja Nacionalnoj zakladi 1951. kao direktor
istraživanja dječje paralize. Kummu se u Nacionalnoj
zakladi pridružio još jedan ključni veteran Rockefeller
Instituta, takozvani "otac virologije", Thomas M. Rivers,
koji je predsjedao zakladnim savjetodavnim odborom za
istraživanje cjepiva koji je nadgledao istraživanje Jonasa
Salka. Ove dvije ključne osobe Instituta Rockefeller tako
su kontrolirale sredstva za istraživanje dječje paralize
uključujući razvoj cjepiva.
Tijekom Drugog svjetskog rata, dok je još bio na
Rockefeller Institutu, Henry Kumm je bio konzultant
američke vojske gdje je nadzirao terenske studije u Italiji.
Tamo je Kumm vodio terenske studije za upotrebu DDT-
a protiv tifusa i malaričnih komaraca u močvarama blizu
insecticide by Swiss drug firm Geigy and their US Rima i Napulja. DDT je patentiran kao insekticid od
branch in 1940, and first authorized for use on US Army strane švicarske farmaceutske tvrtke Geigy i njihovog
soldiers in 1943 as a general disinfectant against head američkog ogranka 1940. godine, a prvi je put odobren
lice, mosquitoes and many other insects. Until war’s end za upotrebu na vojnicima američke vojske 1943. godine
almost all DDT production in the US went to the kao opće sredstvo za dezinfekciju protiv ušiju, komaraca
military. In 1945 the chemical companies looked i mnogih drugih insekata. Do kraja rata gotovo sva
eagerly for new markets. They found them. proizvodnja DDT-a u SAD-u odlazila je vojsci. Godine
1945. kemijske su tvrtke željno tražile nova tržišta. Našli
In early 1944, US newspapers triumphantly reported su ih.
that typhus, “the dreaded plague that has followed in the
wake of every great war in history,” was no longer a Početkom 1944., američke su novine slavodobitno
threat to American troops and their allies thanks to the izvijestile da tifus, "strašna kuga koja je uslijedila nakon
army’s new “louse-killing” powder, DDT. In an svakog velikog rata u povijesti", više nije prijetnja
experiment in Naples, American soldiers dusted more američkim trupama i njihovim saveznicima zahvaljujući
than a million Italians with DDT dissolved with novom vojnom "ubijanju ušiju" prah, DDT. U
kerosene (!), killing the body lice that spread typhus. eksperimentu u Napulju, američki vojnici zaprašili su
Rockefeller Institute’s Henry Kumm and the US Army više od milijun Talijana DDT-om otopljenim u kerozinu
knew that, as one researcher put it, “DDT was a poison, (!), ubijajući tjelesne uši koje šire tifus. Henry Kumm s
but it was safe enough for war. Any person harmed by Instituta Rockefeller i američka vojska znali su da je,
DDT would be an accepted casualty of combat.” The kako je rekao jedan istraživač, “DDT otrov, ali dovoljno
US Government “restricted” a report on insecticides siguran za rat. Svaka osoba oštećena DDT-om bila bi
issued by the Office of Scientific Research and prihvaćena žrtva borbe.” Američka vlada "ograničila" je
Development in 1944 that warned against the izvješće o insekticidima koje je izdao Ured za znanstvena
cumulative toxic effects of DDT in humans and animals. istraživanja i razvoj 1944. godine, a koje je upozoravalo
Dr Morris Biskind noted in a 1949 article, “As DDT is a na kumulativne toksične učinkeDDT-a kod ljudi i
cumulative poison, it is inevitable that large-scale životinja.Dr. Morris Biskind je u članku iz 1949.
intoxication of the American population would occur. In primijetio: “Kako je DDT kumulativni otrov, neizbježno
1944, Smith and Stohlman of the National Institutes of je da će doći do trovanja američkog stanovništva velikih
Health, after an extensive study of the cumulative razmjera. Godine 1944., Smith i Stohlman iz
toxicity of DDT, pointed out, “The toxicity of DDT Nacionalnog instituta za zdravlje, nakon opsežne studije
combined with its cumulative action and absorbability o kumulativnoj toksičnosti DDT-a, istaknuli su:
from the skin places a definite health hazard on its use.” "Toksičnost DDT-a u kombinaciji s njegovim
Their warnings were ignored by higher officials. kumulativnim djelovanjem i upijanjem iz kože stavlja
određenu opasnost po zdravlje od njegove uporabe .”
Instead, after 1945, all across America DDT was Njihova upozorenja viši dužnosnici su ignorirali .
promoted as the miracle new, “safe” pesticide, much
like Monsanto’s Roundup with glyphosate three decades Umjesto toga, nakon 1945. diljem Amerike DDT je
later. DDT was said to be harmless to humans. But no promoviran kao čudesni novi, "siguran" pesticid, slično
one in government was seriously scientifically testing kao Monsantov Roundup s glifosatom tri desetljeća
that claim. One year later in 1945 as the war ended, US kasnije. Rečeno je da je DDT bezopasan za ljude. Ali
newspapers praised the new DDT as a “magic” nitko u vladi nije ozbiljno znanstveno testirao tu tvrdnju.
substance, a “miracle.” Time called DDT “one of the Godinu dana kasnije, 1945., kada je rat završio, američke
great scientific discoveries of World War II.” novine hvalile su novi DDT kao "čarobnu" tvar, "čudo".
Time je nazvao DDT "jednim od velikih znanstvenih
Despite isolated warnings of untested side effects, that it otkrića Drugog svjetskog rata".
was a persistent, toxic chemical which easily
accumulates in the food chain, the US Government Unatoč izoliranim upozorenjima o neprovjerenim
approved DDT for general use in 1945. The Food and nuspojavama, da se radi o postojanoj, toksičnoj
Drug Administration (FDA), controlled by the kemikaliji koja se lako akumulira u prehrambenom lancu,
Rockefeller-AMA-drug interests, established as “safe” a američka vlada odobrila je DDT za opću upotrebu 1945.
DDT content of up to 7 parts per million in foods, Uprava za hranu i lijekove (FDA), pod kontrolom
though no one had proven such. The DDT chemical Rockefeller-AMA - interesi za drogu, utvrdili su kao
companies fed the press with photos and anecdotes. "siguran" sadržaj DDT-a do 7 dijelova na milijun u hrani,
Newspapers enthusiastically reported how the new iako to nitko nije dokazao. Kemijske tvrtke DDT hranile
miracle chemical, DDT, was being tested in the US su tisak fotografijama i anegdotama. Novine su s
against mosquitoes in the South believed carrying entuzijazmom izvijestile kako se nova čudotvorna
malaria, as well as “preserving Arizona vineyards, West kemikalija, DDT, testirala u SAD-u protiv komaraca na
Virginia orchards, Oregon potato fields, Illinois jugu za koje se vjeruje da prenose malariju, kao i o
cornfields, and Iowa dairies.” DDT was everywhere in "očuvanju vinograda u Arizoni, voćnjaka u Zapadnoj
the USA in the late 1940s. Virginiji, polja krumpira u Oregonu, polja kukuruza u
Illinoisu i mljekara u Iowi ". DDT je bio posvuda u SAD-
The US Government claimed DDT, unlike arsenic and u kasnih 1940-ih.
other insecticides used before the war, was harmless to
humans, even infants, and could be used liberally.
Beginning 1945 cities like Chicago sprayed public
beaches, parks, swimming pools. Housewives bought Američka vlada tvrdila je da je DDT, za razliku od
home aerosol spray DDT dispensers to spray the kitchen arsena i drugih insekticida korištenih prije rata,
and especially childrens’ rooms, even their matrasses. bezopasan za ljude, čak i za dojenčad, i da se može
Farmers were told to spray their crops and their animals, obilno koristiti. Početkom 1945. gradovi poput Chicaga
especially dairy cows, with DDT. In postwar America poprskali su javne plaže, parkove, bazene. Domaćice su
DDT was being promoted, above all by Rockefeller kupovale kućne aerosolne raspršivače DDT-a za prskanje
drug companies like American Home Products with its kuhinja, a posebno dječjih soba, čak i njihovih madraca.
Black Flag aerosol DDT spray, and Monsanto. From Poljoprivrednicima je rečeno da prskaju svoje usjeve i
1945 through 1952 the US production of DDT increased životinje, posebno krave muzare, DDT-jem. U
tenfold. poslijeratnoj Americi DDT su promovirale prije svega
Rockefellerove farmaceutske tvrtke poput American
As presumed cases of polio literally exploded across the Home Products sa svojim aerosolnim DDT sprejom
USA after 1945 the theory was advanced, with no proof, Black Flag i Monsanto. Od 1945. do 1952. proizvodnja
that the crippling polio disease was transmitted, not by DDT-a u SAD-u se udeseterostručila .
toxic pesticide chemicals like DDT, but by mosquitoes
or flies to humans, most especially young children or Kako su pretpostavljeni slučajevi dječje paralize
infants. The message was that DDT can safely protect doslovno eksplodirali diljem SAD-a nakon 1945. godine,
your family from the crippling polio. Officially listed napredovala je teorija, bez ikakvih dokaza, da se
polio cases went from some 25,000 in 1943 before US paralizirajuća dječja paraliza ne prenosi toksičnim
civilian use of DDT, to over 280,000 cases in 1952 at pesticidnim kemikalijama poput DDT-a, već komarcima
the peak, more than a tenfold increase. ili mušicama na ljude, posebno malu djecu ili dojenčad.
Poruka je bila da DDT može sigurno zaštititi vašu obitelj
od paralizirajuće dječje paralize. Službeno navedeni
slučajevi dječje paralize porasli su s nekih 25 000 u 1943.
In October 1945 DDT, which had been used by the US prije američke civilne upotrebe DDT-a, na preko 280 000
Army under supervision of Rockefeller Institute’s slučajeva u 1952. na vrhuncu, što je više od
Henry Kumm as noted, was authorized by the US deseterostruko povećanje.
Government for general use as an insecticide against
mosquitoes and flies. Dissenting scientists warning of U listopadu 1945. DDT, koji je koristila američka vojska
toxic effects of DDT in humans and animals were pod nadzorom Henryja Kumma s Instituta Rockefeller,
silenced. Families were told DDT could save their kao što je navedeno, odobrila je vlada SAD-a za opću
children from the dreaded polio by killing the feared upotrebu kao insekticid protiv komaraca i muha.
insects. Nesložna upozorenja znanstvenika o toksičnim učincima
DDT-a na ljude i životinje su ušutkana. Obiteljima je
The US Department of Agriculture advised farmers to rečeno da bi DDT mogao spasiti njihovu djecu od
wash their dairy cows with a solution of DDT to combat zastrašujuće dječje paralize ubijanjem kukaca kojih se
mosquitoes and flies. Cornfields were aerial sprayed plaše.
with DDT as well as fruit orchards. However it was
incredibly persistent and its toxic effect on plants and Ministarstvo poljoprivrede SAD-a savjetovalo je
vegetables were such it could not be washed off. Year- farmerima da peru svoje mliječne krave otopinom DDT-a
by-year from 1945 through 1952 the amount of DDT za borbu protiv komaraca i muha. Polja kukuruza su
sprayed across the US increased. Notably, so too did the prskana DDT-om iz zraka, kao i voćnjaci. Međutim, bio
number of human cases of poliomyelitis. je nevjerojatno postojan i njegov toksični učinak na
biljke i povrće bio je takav da se nije mogao isprati. Iz
Worst Polio Epidemic godine u godinu od 1945. do 1952. povećavala se
količina DDT-a raspršenog diljem SAD-a. Značajno je i
By the beginning of the 1950s increasing attention was broj slučajeva poliomijelitisa kod ljudi.
given in the US Congress and among farmers as to the
possible dangers of such heavy pesticide use—not only Najgora epidemija dječje paralize
DDT, but also the even more toxic BHC (benzene
hexachloride). In 1951 Morton Biskind, a physician who Početkom 1950-ih u Kongresu SAD-a i među
had successfully treated several hundred patients with poljoprivrednicima sve je više pozornosti pridavano
DDT poisoning, testified to the US House of mogućim opasnostima tako teške uporabe pesticida—ne
Representatives on the possible link of paralytic polio to samo DDT-a, već i još otrovnijeg BHC-a (benzen
toxins, specifically DDT and BHC. He noted, heksaklorid). Godine 1951. Morton Biskind, liječnik koji
je uspješno liječio nekoliko stotina pacijenata s
“The introduction for uncontrolled general use by the trovanjem DDT-om, posvjedočio je Zastupničkom domu
public of the insecticide “DDT” (chlorophenothane) and Kongresa SAD-a o mogućoj povezanosti paralitičke
the series of even more deadly substances that followed, dječje paralize s toksinima, posebno DDT-jem i BHC-
has no previous counterpart in history. Beyond question, om. Napomenuo je,
no other substance known to man was ever before
developed so rapidly and spread indiscriminately over “ Uvođenje insekticida “DDT” (klorofenotan) u
so large a portion of the earth in so short a time. This is nekontroliranu opću upotrebu javnosti i niza još
the more surprising as, at the time DDT was released for smrtonosnijih tvari koje su uslijedile, nema dosadašnjeg
public use, a large amount of data was already available pandana u povijesti. Izvan sumnje, nijedna druga tvar
in the medical literature showing that this agent was poznata čovjeku nikada se prije nije tako brzo razvila i
extremely toxic for many different species of animals, neselektivno proširila preko tako velikog dijela Zemlje u
that it was cumulatively stored in the body fat and that it tako kratkom vremenu. Ovo je tim više iznenađujuće što
appeared in the milk. At this time a few cases of DDT je, u trenutku kada je DDT pušten u javnu uporabu, u
poisoning in human beings had also been reported. medicinskoj literaturi već bila dostupna velika količina
These observations were almost completely ignored or podataka koji su pokazali da je to sredstvo izuzetno
misinterpreted.” toksično za mnoge različite vrste životinja, da je
kumulativno pohranjeno u tjelesne masti i da se pojavila
u mlijeku. U to vrijeme zabilježeno je i nekoliko
slučajeva trovanja DDT-om kod ljudi. Ta su zapažanja
Biskind further testified to Congress in late 1950, “Early gotovo potpuno zanemarena ilipogrešno protumačeno .”
last year I published a series of observations on DDT
poisoning in man. Since shortly after the last war a large
number of cases had been observed by physicians all
over the country in which a group of symptoms Biskind je dalje posvjedočio Kongresu krajem 1950.
occurred, the most prominent feature of which was godine: “Početkom prošle godine objavio sam niz
gastroenteritis, persistently recurrent nervous symptoms, zapažanja o trovanju ljudi DDT-jem. Budući da je
and extreme muscular weakness…” He described nedugo nakon posljednjeg rata liječnici diljem zemlje
several case examples of patients whose severe promatrali velik broj slučajeva u kojima se javljala
symptoms including paralysis disappeared when skupina simptoma, od kojih je najistaknutija značajka
exposure to DDT and related toxins was eliminated: bila gastroenteritis, živčani simptomi koji se stalno
“My original experience on more than 200 cases which I ponavljaju i ekstremna mišićna slabost…” Opisao je.
reported early last year has since been considerably nekoliko primjera slučajeva pacijenata čiji su teški
extended. My subsequent observations have not only simptomi, uključujući paralizu, nestali kada je izloženost
confirmed the view that DDT is responsible for a great DDT-u i srodnim toksinima eliminirana: „Moje izvorno
deal of otherwise inexplicable human disability…” Also iskustvo s više od 200 slučajeva koje sam prijavio
noted was the fact that polio cases were always most in početkom prošle godine u međuvremenu je znatno
summer months when DDT spraying against insects was prošireno. Moja kasnija opažanja nisu samo potvrdila
maximum. gledište da je DDT odgovoran za velik dio inače
 neobjašnjivih ljudskih invaliditeta…” Također je
istaknuta činjenica da je slučajeva dječje paralize uvijek
The Rockefeller Institute operatives and the AMA, via bilo najviše u ljetnim mjesecima kada je prskanje DDT-
their agents in the US Government, created the 1946- om protiv insekata bilo maksimalno.
1952 USA health emergency called polio. They did so
by knowingly promoting the highly toxic DDT as a safe Operativci Instituta Rockefeller i AMA, preko svojih
way to control the mythical insect spreaders of the agenata u Vladi SAD-a, stvorili su hitnu zdravstvenu
feared disease. Their propaganda campaign convinced situaciju u SAD-u 1946.-1952., zvanu dječja paraliza.
the American population that DDT was the key to stop Učinili su to svjesno promovirajući visoko otrovni DDT
spread of poliomyelitis. kao siguran način za kontrolu mitskih insekata koji šire
strašnu bolest. Njihova propagandna kampanja uvjerila je
Polio Suddenly Declines američko stanovništvo da je DDT ključ za zaustavljanje
širenja poliomijelitisa.
Under leadership of the two Rockefeller Institute
doctors, Henry Kumm and Thomas Rivers, the National Dječja paraliza iznenada opada
Foundation for Infantile Paralysis (NFIP) rejected critics
such as Biskind and Scobey. Natural remedial treatment, Pod vodstvom dvojice liječnika Rockefeller Instituta,
such as using intravenous Vitamin C for the infantile Henryja Kumma i Thomasa Riversa, Nacionalna zaklada za
paralysis, were rejected out of hand as “quackery.” In dječju paralizu (NFIP) odbacila je kritičare poput Biskinda i
April 1953, leading Rockefeller Institute DDT Scobeya. Prirodno liječenje, kao što je korištenje
consultant, Dr Henry Kumm, became Director of Polio intravenskog vitamina C za dječju paralizu, odmah je
Research for NFIP. He funded the polio vaccine odbačeno kao " nadriliječništvo ".jaU travnju 1953., vodeći
research of Jonas Salk. DDT konzultant Instituta Rockefeller, dr. Henry Kumm,
postao je direktor istraživanja poliomijelitisa za NFIP.
One courageous doctor in North Carolina, Dr. Fred R. Financirao je istraživanje cjepiva protiv dječje paralize
Klenner, who had also studied chemistry and Jonasa Salka.
physiology, had the idea to use large doses of
Jedan hrabri liječnik u Sjevernoj Karolini, dr. Fred R.
intravenous ascorbic acid—Vitamin C—on the
Klenner, koji je također studirao kemiju i fiziologiju, došao
hypothesis that his patients were victims of toxin
je na ideju da koristi velike doze intravenske askorbinske
poisoning and that Vitamin C was a powerful detox.
kiseline – vitamina C – na temelju hipoteze da su njegovi
This was well before Dr Linus Pauling’s Nobel Prize pacijenti žrtve trovanja toksinima i da Vitamin C bio je
research on Vitamin C. Klenner had remarkable success snažan detox. To je bilo mnogo prije istraživanja dr. Linusa
within days for more than 200 patients in the summer Paulinga o vitaminu C koje je dobio Nobelovu nagradu.
epidemics of 1949 to 1951. The Rockefeller Institute Klenner je postigao izvanredan uspjeh u nekoliko dana za
and the AMA had no interest in the remedial prospects. više od 200 pacijenata u ljetnim epidemijama 1949.-1951.
They and the Rockefeller-controlled National Rockefeller institut i AMA nisu bili zainteresirani za
Foundation for Infantile Paralysis were only funding izglede za oporavak.Oni i Nacionalna zaklada za dječju
polio vaccine development, based on the unproven paralizu koju kontrolira Rockefeller samo su financirali
Flexner claim that polio was a contagious virus, not a razvoj cjepiva protiv dječje paralize, na temelju nedokazane
result of environmental poison. Flexnerove tvrdnje da je dječja paraliza zarazan virus, a ne
rezultat otrova iz okoliša.
Then beginning sometime in 1951-1952, as polio cases
were at an all-time high, something unexpected began to Zatim početkom negdje 1951.-1952., kada su slučajevi
appear. The number of cases diagnosed as polio in the dječje paralize bili na vrhuncu svih vremena, počelo se
US began to decline. The decline in polio victims was pojavljivati nešto neočekivano. Broj slučajeva
dramatic, year by year until 1955, well before the dijagnosticiranog kao dječja paraliza u SAD-u počeo je
National Foundation and Jonas Salk’s polio vaccine was opadati. Pad broja oboljelih od dječje paralize bio je
approved for public use and was widespread. dramatičan, iz godine u godinu sve do 1955. mnogo prije
nego što je Nacionalna zaklada i cjepivo protiv dječje
About a year before the sudden decline in polio cases, paralize Jonasa Salka odobreno za javnu upotrebu i postalo
farmers, whose dairy cows were suffering severe effects široko rasprostranjeno.
of the DDT, were advised by the US Department of
Agriculture to reduce DDT use. Rising public concern Otprilike godinu dana prije naglog pada broja slučajeva
dječje paralize, farmerima, čije su krave muzare imale
about how safe DDT was for humans, including ozbiljne posljedice DDT-a, američko Ministarstvo
publicized US Senate hearings on DDT and Polio in poljoprivrede savjetovalo je da smanje upotrebu DDT-a.
1951 also led to a significant decline in DDT exposure Rastuća zabrinutost javnosti o tome koliko je DDT siguran
into 1955, even though DDT was not officially banned za ljude, uključujući objavljena saslušanja američkog
in the US until 1972. Senata o DDT-u i dječjoj paralizi 1951. godine, također je
dovela do značajnog pada izloženosti DDT-u u 1955.
So-called “polio” cases fell by some two-thirds in that godini, iako DDT nije bio službeno zabranjen u SAD-u sve
1952-1956 time, in a remarkable parallel to the decline do 1972. godine.
in DDT use. It was well after that decline, in late 1955
and 1956, that the Rockefeller-developed Salk polio Slučajevi takozvanih "dječije paralize" pali su za neke dvije
vaccine was first administered in large populations. Salk trećine u tom razdoblju od 1952. do 1956. godine, u
and the AMA gave all credit to the vaccine. Deaths and nevjerojatnoj paraleli s padom upotrebe DDT-a. Dosta
nakon tog pada, krajem 1955. i 1956. godine, Salkovo
paralysis as a result of the Salk vaccine were papered
cjepivo protiv dječje paralize koje je razvio Rockefeller prvi
over. The Government changed the definition of polio to
put je primijenjeno u velikim populacijama. Salk i AMA
further reduce official cases. Simultaneously, cases of dali su sve zasluge cjepivu. Smrti i paraliza kao posljedica
similar polio-like spinal cord nerve diseases– acute Salkovog cjepiva bili su zataškani. Vlada je promijenila
flaccid paralysis, chronic fatigue syndrome, definiciju dječje paralize kako bi dodatno smanjila službene
encephalitis, meningitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, slučajeve. Istodobno, značajno su porasli slučajevi sličnih
muscular sclerosis—rose notably. bolesti živaca leđne moždine poput dječje paralize – akutne
mlohave paralize, sindroma kroničnog umora, encefalitisa,
meningitisa, Guillain-Barréovog sindroma, mišićne
skleroze.
Why it Matters
Zašto je to važno
Over a century ago the world’s richest man, oil baron
John D. Rockefeller, and his circle of advisors set about Prije više od jednog stoljeća najbogatiji čovjek na svijetu,
to completely reorganize how medicine was practiced in naftni barun John D. Rockefeller, i njegov krug
the USA and the rest of the world. The role of the savjetnika krenuli su u potpunu reorganizaciju
Rockefeller Institute and figures like Simon Flexner prakticiranja medicine u SAD-u i ostatku svijeta. Uloga
literally oversaw the invention of a colossal medical Instituta Rockefeller i osoba poput Simona Flexnera
fraud around claims that an invisible contagious doslovno je nadgledala izum kolosalne medicinske
extraneous germ, the polio virus, caused acute paralysis prijevare oko tvrdnji da nevidljiva zarazna vanjska klica,
and even death in young people. They politically banned virus dječje paralize, uzrokuje akutnu paralizu, pa čak i
any efforts to link the disease to toxin poisoning, smrt kod mladih ljudi. Politički su zabranili bilo kakve
whether from DDT or arsenic pesticides or even pokušaje povezivanja bolesti s trovanjem toksinima, bilo
contaminated vaccine poisoning. Their criminal project od DDT-a ili arsenskih pesticida ili čak trovanja
included intimate cooperation with the leadership of the kontaminiranim cjepivom. Njihov zločinački projekt
AMA and control of the emerging drug industry, as well uključivao je blisku suradnju s vodstvom AMA-e i
as of medical education. The same Rockefeller group kontrolu industrije lijekova u nastajanju, kao i
financed Nazi eugenics at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes medicinskog obrazovanja. Ista grupa Rockefeller
in Germany in the 1930s as well as the American financirala je nacističku eugeniku na institutima Kaiser
Eugenics Society. In the 1970s they financed the Wilhelm u Njemačkoj 1930-ih, kao i Američko
creation of patented GMO seeds which were all eugeničko društvo. U 1970-ima financirali su stvaranje
developed by the group of Rockefeller chemical patentiranog GMO sjemena koje je sve razvila grupa
pesticide companies—Monsanto, DuPont, Dow. Rockefellerovih kompanija za kemijske pesticide -
Monsanto, DuPont, Dow.
Today this control of public health and the medical
industrial complex is exercised by David Rockefeller’s Danas ovu kontrolu nad javnim zdravstvom i
protegé and eugenics advocate, Bill Gates, self- medicinskim industrijskim kompleksom provodi štićenik
appointed czar over the WHO and world vaccines. Dr Davida Rockefellera i zagovornik eugenike, Bill Gates,
Tony Fauci, head of NIAID, dictates vaccine mandates samoimenovani car nad WHO-om i svjetskim cjepivima.
without evidence. The fraud behind the polio virus Dr. Tony Fauci, voditelj NIAID-a, diktira mandate za
scandal after World War II has been refined with use of cjepiva bez dokaza. Prijevara koja stoji iza skandala s
computer models and other ruses today, to advance one virusom dječje paralize nakon Drugog svjetskog rata
alleged deadly virus after the other, from Covid19 to rafinirana je korištenjem računalnih modela i drugih
Monkeypox to HIV. As with polio, none of those has lukavstava danas, kako bi se napredovao jedan navodni
been scientifically isolated and proven to cause the smrtonosni virus za drugim, od Covida19 preko
diseases claimed. None. The same tax-free Rockefeller majmunskih boginja do HIV-a. Kao i kod dječje paralize,
Foundation today, posing as a philanthropic charity, is nijedan od njih nije znanstveno izoliran i dokazano da
at the heart of the global medical tyranny behind uzrokuje bolesti za koje se tvrdi. Nijedan. Ista
covid19 and the eugenics agenda of the World neoporeziva Rockefellerova zaklada danas,
Economic Forum Great Reset. Their poliomyelitis virus predstavljajući se kao filantropska dobrotvorna
model helped them create this dystopian medical organizacija, u srcu je globalne medicinske tiranije iza
tyranny. We are told, “trust the science.” covida19 i eugeničkog programa Velikog resetiranja
Svjetskog ekonomskog foruma. Njihov model virusa
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, poliomijelitisa pomogao im je stvoriti ovu distopijsku
he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is medicinsku tiraniju. Rečeno nam je "vjerujte znanosti".
a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for
the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”. F. William Engdahl je konzultant i predavač za strateški rizik, diplomirao je politiku
na Sveučilištu Princeton i autor je najprodavanijih knjiga o nafti i geopolitici,
ekskluzivno za internetski časopis “New Eastern Outlook” .