Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Brill is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Mnemosyne
BY
RUURD R. NAUTA
Abstract
In this paper,1) Catullus' intentions in writing the Attis poem and his pos-
sible use of a Greek model are deliberately left out of account. Instead,
the focus is on the meaning his poem may have had for his contempo-
rary audience. Attis is a gallus, a castrated devotee of the Mater Magna,
and thus a reconstruction is attempted of the mental picture that Romans
of Catullus' time had of galli. Special importance is given to Lucretius'
excursus on the Mater Magna, and his interpretation of castration as a
punishment for lack of pietas. Finally, a slighdy later source, Vergil's Aeneid,
is used to suggest that Catullus' poem may also have been read as par-
ticipating in a discourse about Roman national identity.
1) For criticism and encouragement I thank the participants in the OIKOS day
from which this issue of Mnemosyne derives (and especially Prof. Jan Bremmer), as
well as my audience at the University of Florence, where I delivered a version of
this paper at the kind invitation of Prof. Mario Citroni.
2) The most important discussions are Wilamowitz 1924, Weinreich [1936] 1975,
Syndikus 1990, esp. 76-80, Gall 1999 and Fantuzzi & Hunter 2002, 550-9.
bined with domus, and that its use is at least in part motivated by this
ical connection); era'. 136 (where likewise the connotation is rather 'mist
house' than 'mistress of the lover as a slave'). For Catullus' use of conce
from the institutions of marriage and amicitia see e.g. E.A. Schmidt 19
Attis f?mula: 63.68, 90; Cybele era: 18, 92, domina (of Mt Dindymon): 1
below, n. 35.
9) But some scholars have compared 11.22-4, where the imagery ca
as evoking castration, and as depicting Lesbia as a 'castrating woman'; c
1974 = 1982, 13-29, Janan 1994, 65, 106-7.
10) The bibliography is large; I mention only Gleason 1995, Hallett
(eds.) 1997, Williams 1999, Gunderson 2000.
11) See esp. Skinner 1997, Wray 2001, Holzberg 2002.
12) I have discussed this poem from a different point of view (that of
T) in Nauta 2002, 370-3.
2. How Would Roman Readers in Catullus' Time Have Read Catullus 63?
13) Cf. Harrison 2004, 520-2 (this issue). At Pessinus in Phrygia, 'Attis' was a
regular title for a high priest of Cybele (see Bremmer 2004, 554 (this issue)), but
there is no evidence that this was the case at Rome; at CIL 6.2183 = ILS 4161
archigallus Matas Deum Magnae Idaeae et Attis populi Romani, which is often cited in
support of this view (e.g. by Kroll (1923, 130), Syndikus (1990, 77, ?. 77), Thomson
(1997, 374)), Attis is a genitive (cf. ILS 4164, 4171, etc.).
14) Cf. Clay 1995, 149-50, Fantuzzi & Hunter 2002, 553; also Harrison 2004, 522.
15) Or. 1453. Further references for the title 'Idaean Mother' in Bremmer 2004,
551, n. 72.
16) This cult is already known to Herodotus (4.76), although to him 'the holy
mountain of the Dindymenan Mother' is in central Phrygia, at the sources of the
Hermus (1.80.1).
17) Apollonius may have followed Neanthes FGrH 84 F 39 (Str. 1.2.38; cf.
12.8.11).
18) Catullus uses Dindymi dominam as a synonym for Magna. . . Mater in describ-
ing a poem-in-progress of his friend Caecilius (35.13-8), and the association of the
goddess with Dindymon (or Dindyma) is current in Latin poetry after him; cf. e.g.
Verg. A. 9.617-20 and 10.252 (both in combination with Idaea Mater), Prop. 3.22.1-4
(in combination with Cyzicus), Ov. Fast. 4.249 (cf. 234), Stat. Theb. 12.224-7, etc.
19) In Livy the instruction given by the Sibylline books is from the s
bring the Mater Idaea from Pessinus (29.10.5; cf. 34.3.8, 35.10.9). In pros
ture the goddess is mostly called Mater Deum or Mater Magna (rather than
Mater, cf. Ziegler 1969) or Mater Idaea. In inscriptions Mater Deum, Mater
Mater Deum Magna are frequent alongside the full expression Mater Deum
Idaea.
20) Mater. 9. Dea Magna: 91 (on the punctuation of 1. 91 see Bremme
566). ?ybele: 12, 68, 76. Cybebe: 9, 20, 35, 84, 91. The manuscripts have
abelle throughout, but most editors print Cybebe, etc. wherever the form
cheus. The corruption of Cybebe to Cybel(l)e may be seen in the tradition o
A. 10.220 (cf. Serv. ad loc), Luc. 1.600 and elsewhere, but some editors o
poetry admit Cybelle (i.a. Ellis in Catullus) or Cyb?le (i.a. Friedrich, Schuster,
in Catullus, Delz in Silius Italicus, Hall in Claudian); see Hall ad Claud. Ra
1.212 for a survey of the evidence. In prose, Cybele/Cybebe occurs only in Ch
writers and grammarians (TLL Onomastkon s.v.); in inscriptions Cybebe see
absent (at ILS 4094 Cybelen should be read; see ILMN 1.561), whereas C
very rare, and is again associated with verse (CLE 467 = Courtney ML 1
= Courtney ML 183, 1110 = ILS 5172, 1529).
21) Wilamowitz (1924, 294) thought that Attis already had these features
his castration, being a pa?? ?a???. But as a frequenter of the gymnasium
he must certainly have developed a healthy sun-tan.
22) The manuscripts offer feminine forms (all metrically guaranteed) a
27, 31, 32, 49, 54, 58, 68, 90, and masculine forms (none metrically gua
at 42, 45, 51, 78, 80, 88, 89. Scholars who attempt to interpret the pa
include Weinreich ([1936] 1975, 343-5), Clay (1995, 146-8), Morisi (1999,
29) On this episode cf. Henrichs 1976, 276-83. On the mendicancy of the galli
see below (end of section 3).
30) She is called Cybebe in Phaedrus (4) and '?e?? in Babrius (9), where Attis is
also mentioned (7).
31) See Sanders 1972, 992 and Lightfoot 2002; 2003, 61-5, 506-7. Note espe-
cially Apuleius' description of the music made by the eunuchs: tinnitu cymbalorum
et sonu tympanorum cantusque Phrygii mulcentibus modulis (8.30.5), which recalls Catul.
63.21-2 and Lucr. 2.618-20.
32) On the Dea Syria at Rome see Lightfoot 2003, 77, n. 205, with refs.
33) Nemus (apart from 2 always in the plural: nemora): 2, 12, 20, 32, 52, 58, 79,
89; cf. siluis (3), siluicultrix. . . nemonuagus (72). Dark: 3, 31. Cold: 53, 70. Wild ani-
mals: 53-4, 72, as well as the lions in 76-89.
34) The image is thus interpreted by Sandy (1971, 192-3; not yet in 1968, 395),
Glenn (1973, who argues for a reference to 'sexual experience' rather than mar-
riage), Clay (1995, 151-2) and Holzberg (2002, 128), but Shipton (1986) and Morisi
(1999, 102-3) only want to see a reference to Attis' ecstatic movements of the head
(cf. 23 and see below, n. 46). Both Clay and Holzberg point out that the mytho-
logical reference in 42-3 (Somnus hastening to the embrace of his wife Pasithea,
a motif deriving from the Homeric scene of the ?e??? ????? of Zeus and Hera on
Mt Ida (!)) implicitly contrasts Attis' state with married love.
35) Catullus' audience will have recognised both famulus and era/domina as cur-
rent in the vocabulary of galli; cf. Henrichs 1976, 272-3, Bremmer 2004, 565. Note
esp. Cic. L?g. 2.22 Idaeae Matris f?mulos; at Var. Men. 140 C?be = 132 ?. famuli is
a conjecture by B?cheier (galli mss.), not accepted by C?be or Astbury.
36) See Harder 2004, 582.
37) Kroll (1923) ad 64 appositely quotes Nepos (Catullus' dedicatee in poem 1):
laudi in Creta (Valckenaer: Graecia mss.) dudtur adulescentulis quam plwrimos habmsse ama-
tores (prol. 4); after giving other examples of divergent norms in Greece and Rome,
42) The scene with Attis and the lion inverts a motif of Hellenistic epigram (AP
6.217-20; cf. also Var. Men. fr. 358 C?be = 364 ?.), where a gallus frightens away
(or tames) a lion. On these epigrams see Gow 1960 (also the commentaries in
HE); on their connections with the poem of Catullus see Fedeli 1981, Courtney
1985, 88-90, Shipton 1987, Gall 1999, and Harder 2004, 577-9.
43) This was seen by Shipton (1986).
44) Eryc. AP 6.234 = 2259 GPh, Maec. fr. 6 FLP (Courtney) = 6 FPD, Plu.
1127c, all of followers of Cybele. Cf. Apul. Met. 8.28.2-3 ~ [Luc] Ann. 38, Lucian
Syr.D. 50, of followers of the Dea Syria, who combine self-flagellation with gashing
their arms with knives. The latter practice is also attested for followers of Cybele:
anon. AP 6.51.7-8 = HE 3838-9, Prop. 2.22.15-6, Sen. Ag. 687-90, V.F1. 3.20,
Stat. Theb. 10.170-5, Mart. 11.84.3-4, etc. It was also associated with the cult of
Bellona: Tib. 1.6.45-8 (where uerbera are also mentioned), Luc. 1.565-7, etc.; see
Sanders 1972, 992-3.
49) On hymnic features see esp. Fantuzzi & Hunter 2002, 550-2; a
2004, 528-30. The use of galliambics in hymns to the Mother of
attested by Heph. 12.1 (p. 38.15-6 C); see Nauta 2004.
50) See Wiseman 1985, 198-206. Serv. ad Verg. G. 2.394: hymni L
Graecos Graeca, apud Latinos Latina uoce dicuntur; hymni uero Matris Deum ubiq
id est Graecam, linguam requirunt. Of course, Servius' information may
reliable, but there are other difficulties with Wiseman's hypothesis,
won support.
51) Thus Hutchinson 1988, 311 (he does not, however, consider
be a hymn: 314, n. 74); Harrison 2004, 530.
Such a reading would imply that the speaker is not himself a gal-
Jus, not even one who is having a moment of lucid regret: for a
gallus would have known, like Attis (57), that such moments cannot
last.52) Moreover, unlike Attis (58), the speaker of the poem still has
a domus, which he hopes will not be touched by furor: procul a mea
tuos sit furor omnis, era, domo, 'may all that frenzy of yours, mistress,
be far away from my home' (92). This means that the use of era
must be motivated by fear and flattery rather than by subjection,
and that the metre must have been chosen as fitting the theme.
One may compare Varro's Menippean satire Eumenides, where gal-
liambics seem to be used not only to report the song sung by the
galli, but also to describe their behaviour from the outside (fr. 139
C?be = 131 ?.).53) Moreover in that satire the narrator?who with
certainty is no gallus?exclaims apage in dierectum a domo nostra istam
insanitatem, 'off, straight away from my home with that insanity5 (fr.
142 C?be =133 ?.), which is clearly behind Catullus' formulation
just quoted. So Catullus' readers are not invited to construct the
speaker as a gallus, rather perhaps as the poet himself. This is impor-
tant, because they presumably could not easily identify with a gal-
lus, whereas they could with a young man who is fascinated, but
also repelled by galli It may be worthwhile to see what other sources
may teach about the attitudes of Catullus' readers.
52) That the speaker is a gallus identifying with Attis' regret is suggested by
Fantuzzi & Hunter (2002, 552).
53) Phrygius per ossa cornus liquida canit anima (fr. 140 C?be = 132 ?.). It cannot
be excluded, however, that this line formed part of the song of the galli. The
reconstruction of the satire is discussed in detail by C?be (1977, 543-65, 748-54).
For a helpful brief account see Wiseman 1985, 204-5, 269-72, who argues (rightly,
I think) that the satire is not set in Greece (as C?be believes), but in Rome.
54) See Bremmer 2004, 558. Add Met Her. 4.62, ThyiU. AP 7.223 = 364-71 FGE
(Thyillus was active at Rome in the 60s; see Wiseman 1974, 145-6), and perhaps
61) ND 6 (p. 5.9-6.19 L.). On Cornutus and his sources see J. Schmidt 1990,
131-40 (who follows Boyanc? (1941, 155-6, 160-1 = 1972, 214-5, 219-20) in believ-
ing in a common source for Cornutus and Lucretius), and more in general Ramelli
2003.
62) For the syncretism between the (Cretan) Curet?s and the (Phrygian) Corybantes,
concurrent with that between Rhea and Cybele, cf. Borner and Fantham ad 210,
with refs. The temple of the Mater Magna on the Palatine as restored by Augustus
had akroteria in the form of armed Corybantes/Curetes, as is shown by its depic-
tion on a relief in the Villa Medici in Rome (formerly believed to belong to an
'Ara Pietatis Augustae'); see e.g. Vermaseren 1977, pi. 33 (and cf. also the statue
base from Sorrento: ibid. pi. 59). Martial mentions a Cybeles picto . . . Corybante tho-
lus (1.70.10), which may or may not be identical with the temple on the Palatine;
see Pensabene 1996, 206-8.
65) Cf. also D.H. 2.19.3-5, quoted below (section 4). For Roman
Lucretius' excursus see esp. Summers 1996 (against i.a. J. Schmidt (1
66) Lucretius: 612, 628; cf. 640. Ovid: Fast. 4.185, 212, 341. Catu
27. Also Maec. fr. 6 FLP (Courtney) = FPD. Note Paul, ex Fest. p
qui uocantur Matris Magnae comit?s.
67) This means that the reconstruction I am offering is not depen
hypothesis that Catullus' audience knew (a version of) the De rerum n
must remain uncertain.
68) Cf. Bailey ad loc. Boyanc? (1941, 152-6 = 1972, 210-5), followed by
J. Schmidt (1990, 133), argues that the reference is to a story, attested in a late
source (S Luc. JTr 8, p. 60 R.), that Attis was the son of Cybele and tried to
rape his mother, and that the punishment of the galli is for incestuous passion.
But that crime seems hardly widespread enough to explain Lucretius' generalising
plural. Sharpies (1985) quotes evidence ([Plu.] Fluv. 9.5, [Arist.] Mir. 162, 846b3-
6) that Cybele was associated with e?s??e?a towards parents in the region of Mt
Sipylon (I could not procure the article and am dependent on the summary in
J. Schmidt 1990, 134).
69) These are probably the knives with which they gash themselves: see above,
n. 44.
70) In Ovid the story is an aetiology of the music of tambourines and cymbals
(as is the armed dance of the Argonauts in A.R. 1.1134-9), and it may have been
thus in Lucretius' Grai. The armed dancers seem different from the unm
(cf. Verg. A. 9.620 unite arma uiris, discussed below, section 4), but Cr
84-93) argues for identity; Bellandi (1975) proposes that they were in fa
ers of BeDona (for the syncretism of the two cults cf. ?. 44 and 46).
71) The fragment was adduced by Ellis (1889, 269 ad 49). On text an
pretation see the editions of Astbury and C?be (1985, 1086-7, 1102-9)
mentioned in the same satire at fr. 235 C?be = 238 ?.
72) See Graillot 1912, 312-6, Sanders 1972, 1016-7. Mendicancy is often implied
even where it is not explicitly mentioned; cf. e.g. Petr. 117.3 (with Tandoi 1992;
a reference I owe to Mario Labate), Tib. 1.4.67-70 (with Murgatroyd ad loc), and
Call. fr. 193.34-39 Pf. (where Kerkhecker (1999, 79-80) sees the economic refer-
ence, but connects it with 'the wealth of the Galli' (quoting Rhet. Her. 4.62) rather
than their poverty).
73) Apul. Met. 8.24-9.10 - [Luc] Ann. 35-41; cf. Phdr. 4.1 and Babr. 141; both
the Onos and Babrius call the galli ????ta?. In one of the Greek epigrams on the
gallus and the lion (above, n. 42) the gallus is called a ??t??? a???t?? (Alc.Mess.
?? 6.218.1 = 134 HE).
74) See Cic. Leg. 2.22, 40, Ov. Fast. 4.350, Pont. 1.1.40 (all these texts use the
same word stips as does Lucretius) and D.H. 2.19.4-5 (here the verb ??t?a???te??
is used).
75) For a brief account of the Megalesia see Scullard 1981, 97-101. Cicero of
82) Construction of the ships: 9.80-9 (cf. 3.5-6; the beak of Aeneas' own ship
carries the images of Ida and of Cybele's lions: 10.156-8); transformation: 9.90-
122, 10.219-28; warning: 10.228-45; Aeneas' prayer: 10.251-5; alma parens Idaea
deum of course paraphrases the official cult tide Mater Deum Magna Idaea; cf. ?. 19.
Another prayer at 7.139. Cf. also 2.788, where Creusa is whisked away by the
magna deum genetrix.
83) Comit?s: ?. 66. Semiuir. the word appears for the first time in Varr?, with
reference to the galli: Men. fr. 140 C?be = 132 B. (cf. further OLD s.v.). Ovid calls
the galli semimares (Fast. 4.183).
84) Cedite ferro may carry a hint of castration (Horsfall [1971] 1990, 307, Dingel
ad loc.)\ Hardie (ad loc.) refers to Catul. 66.47 cum ferro talia c?dant, with reference
to Berenice's hair. But it may be doubted whether the self-castration of galli was
associated with iron: it was normally carried out by a sharp stone (acuto . . . silice
in Catullus (5), saxo . . . acuto of Attis in Ov. Fast. 4.237) or a potsherd (e.g. Lucil.
fr. 280-1 M., M. Caelius according to Plin. Mt. 35.165, Mart. 3.81.3, Juv. 6.514),
although knives are also mentioned and iron is even specified at Mart. 2.45.2 (cf.
Stat. Theb. 12.227, discussed above); see Graillot 1912, 296, Sanders 1972, 1004,
Bremmer 2004, 559 with nn. 121-2.
85) On the significance of Ascanius1 reaction see Hardie ad 621-71.
86) For the connection of the passage with the Roman discourse on decay see
Horsfall [1971] 1990, 311.
87) The main source is Liv. 29.10.4-11.8, 14.5-14; Var. L 6.15 claims that the
stone representing the goddess came from Pergamum itself. For detailed discus-
sion see Gruen 1990, 5-33, Roller 1999, 263-85, and Erskine 2001, 205-24; cf.
also Bremmer 2004, 557-8.
88) The only exception is the third-century CE Greek historian Herodian, who
has the Romans motivate their request to 'the Phrygians' (Attalus is not men-
tioned) from s?????e?a? . . . ?a? t?? ?p' ???e??? t?? F????? e? a?t??? d?ad????
(1.11.3). Gruen (1990, 15-9) supposes that Ovid's story is substantially correct, but
cf. the scepsis of Erskine (2001, 205-24), who argues that the Trojan connection
was only used in Rome's 'kinship diplomacy' with King Attalus and played no
significant role in Rome itself.
89) On the meaning of the Palatine location see Wiseman 1984, 123-7; on the
name Mater Idaea see above, section 1.
90) Lucretius: 2.611. Cicero: Ver. 5.186, Har. 22, Leg. 2.22, 40; cf. Fin. 5.22,
Sen. 45.
91) Erskine 2001, 15-43. The only Trojan references in Cicero are Ver. 4.72
and Div. 4.72 (both on Aeneas).
92) A brief survey in Erskine 2001, 19, with refs. Caesar also celebrated the
Megalesia with particular splendour when curule aedile in 65, according to Cassius
Dio (37.8.1). It has been proposed (Boyanc? 1954, 340 = 1972, 198-9, taking up
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen,
Afdeling Griekse en Romeinse Studies
R.R.Nauta@let.rug.nl
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Beard, M. 1994. The Roman and the Foreign: the Cult of the "Great Mother" in Im
Rome, in: Thomas, N., Humphreys, C. (eds.), Shamanism, History, and the State
Arbor), 164-90
Beard, M., North, J., Price, S. 1998. Religions of Rome, 1: A History (Cambrid
Becher, I. 1991. Der Kult der Magna Mater in augusteischer %eit, Klio 73, 157-70
Bellandi, F. 1975. Sanguine laeti. Ipoten sulla danza "emetica" di Lucrezio II, 629
Athenaeum 63, 18-32
Boyanc?, P. 1941. Une ex?g?se sto?cienne chez Lucr?ce, REL 19, 147-66 - 1972. ?
sur la religion romaine (Rome), 205-25
-. 1954. Cyb?U aux M?gal?sies, Latomus 13, 337-42 = ?tudes, 195-200
Bremmer, J.N. 2004. Attis: A Greek God in Anatolian Pessinous and Catullan R
Mnemosyne 57, 534-73
C?be, J.-P. 1977. Varron. Satires M?nipp?es. ?dition, traduction et commentaire,
(Rome)
-. 1985. V?rron. Satires M?nipp?es. ?dition, traduction et commentaire, vol. 7 (Rome)
Charitonidis, S., Kahil, L., Ginouv?s, R. 1970. L?s mosa?ques de la maison de M?nandre
? Mytil?ne (Bern)
Clay, J.S. 1995. Catullus' Attis and the Black Hunter, QUCC 50, 143-55
Conte, G.?. 1974. Memona dei poeti e sistema letterar?o. Catullo Virgilio Ovidio Lucano
(Turin)
Courtney, E. 1985. Three Poems of Catullus, BICS 32, 85-100
-. 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets (Oxford, reprinted with addenda 2003) =
FLP
-. 1995. Musa Lapidaria. A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions (Atlanta) = ML
Craca, C. 2000. L? possibilit? della poesia. Lucrezio e la Madre frigia in De rerum natura
II 598-660 (Bari)
Ellis, R. 21889. A Commentary on Catullus (Oxford)
Erskine, A. 2001. Troy between Greece and Rome. Local Tradition and Imperial Power
(Oxford)
97) The parallelism between the two phrases in Ovid was pointed out by
Littlewood (1981, 392).
Morisi, L. 1999. Gaio Valerio Catullo. Attis (carmen LXIII). Introduzione, testo,
e commento (Bologna)
Most, G.W. 1981. On the Anangement of Catullus' carmina maiora, Philo
109-25
Mulroy, D. 1976. Hephaestion and Catullus 63, Phoenix, 61-72
Nauta, R.R. 1994. Historicizing Reading: the Aesthetics of Reception and Horace'
Ode3, in: de Jong, I.J.F., Sullivan, J.P. (eds.), Modern Cntical Theory an
Literature (Leiden), 207-30
-. 2002. 'Lyrisch ik' en persona in de bestudering van de Romeinse poe'zie, L
363-86
-. 2004. Hephaestion and Catullus 63 Again, Mnemosyne 57, 651-6
Page, D.L. 1981. Further Greek Epigrams. Epigrams before A.D. 50 from the Greek Anthohgy
Not Included in 'Hellenistic Epigrams' or 'The Garland of Philip' (Cambridge) = FGE
Pensabene, P. 1996. Magna Mater, Aedes, LTUR 3, 206-8
Putnam, M.C.J. 1974. Catullus IJ: the Ironies of Integrity, Ramus 3, 70-86 = id.,
1982. Essays in Latin Lyric, Elegy, and Epie (Princeton), 13-29
Quinn, K. 1972. Catullus. An Interpretation (London)
Ramelli, I. 2003. Anneo Cornuto. Compendio di teobgia greca. Saggio introduttivo e integra-
tivo, traduzione e apparati (Milan)
Richmond, J.A. 2001. Review of Morisi 1999, CR 51, 397-8
Roller, L.E. 1999. In Search of God the Mother. The Cult of Anatolian Cybele (Berkeley
etc.)
Sanders, G. 1972. Gallos, RAC 8, 984-1034
Sandy, G.N. 1968. The Imagery of Catullus 63, TAPhA 99, 389-99
-. 1971. Catullus 63 and the Theme of Marriage, AJPh 92, 185-95
Schmidt, E.A. 1985. Catull (Heidelberg)
Schmidt, J. 1990. Lukrez, der Kepos und die Stoiker. Untersuchungen zur Schule Epikurs
und zu den (Quellen von "De rerum natura" (Frankfurt/M. etc.)
Schrijvers, P.H. 1970. Honor oc divina voluptas. ?tudes sur la po?tique et la po?sie de
Lua?ce (Amsterdam)
Scullard, H.H. 1981. FestwaL? and Ceremonies of the Roman Republic (London)
Sharpies, R.W. 1976. Cybele and fyyalty to Parents, LCM 10, 133-4
Shipton, K.M.W. 1986. The iuvenca Image in Catullus 63, CQ 36, 268-70
-. 1987. The 'Attis' of Catullus, CQ, 37, 444-9
Skinner, M.B. 1997. Ego mulier. The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus, in:
Hallett & Skinner (eds.), 129-50 (an earlier version appeared in 1993)
Summers, K. 1996. Lucretius' Roman Cybele, in: E.N. Lane (ed.), Cybele, Attis and
Related Cults (Leiden), 337-65
Syndikus, H.P. 1990. Catull. Eine Interpretation, 2: Die gro?en Gedichte (61-68) (Darmstadt)
Tandoi, V. 1992. Come entrare a Crotone (Petr. Satyr. 117), in: id., Scritti di filologia e
di storia della cultura classica (Pisa), 1.624-32
Thomson, D.F.S. 1997. Catullus. Edited with Textual and Interpretative Commentary
(Toronto etc.)
Vermaseren, MJ. 1977. Cybele and Attis. The Myth and the Cult (London)
Weinreich, O. 1936. Catulh Attisgedicht, cited after Heine, R. (ed.) 1975. Catull
(Darmstadt), 325-59
West, D. 1969. The Imagery and Poetry of Lucretius (Edinburgh)
von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. 1879. Die Galliamben des Kallimachos und Catullus,
Hermes 14, 194-201 - id., 1941. Kleine Schriften, 2: Hellenistische, sp?tgriechische und
lateinische Poesie (Berlin), 1-8
-. 1924. Hellenistische Dichtung in der ?eit des Kallimachos, 2: Interpretationen (Berlin)