Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Understanding Equipment Failure Patterns
Understanding Equipment Failure Patterns
Equipment Failure
Patterns.
AGE-RELATED
Failures associated to
the equipment's time
in service.
Usually related to
corrosion, erosion, or
wear.
This can be measured
in time, frequency of
use, or both.
Accounts for 11% of all
failures
PATTERN A
Bathtub
High probability of
failure when the
equipment is new.
Low level of random
failures throughout life
Spike in failures at the
end of life
Example: hydraulic or
pneumatic cylinders.
4% of all failures
PATTERN B
Wear Out
Low level of random
failures from
installation and most of
life
Sharp increase in
failures at the end of
life
Examples: Light bulbs,
latches, piping.
2% of all failures
PATTERN C
Fatigue
Low level failures at
installation
Gradual increase in
failures over time
Examples: Brakes, tires,
drive belts.
5% of all failures
RANDOM
Failures without a
specific pattern
throughout the
equipment's life.
Best solved with
condition-based
maintenance
Accounts for 89% of
all failures
PATTERN D
Best New
Very low level of
failures at installation.
Sharp rise to a constant
level of failures where
capabilities are
reduced.
Examples: Springs, O-
Rings, Nuclear
Reactors.
Accounts for 7% of all
failures
PATTERN E
Random
Sporadic, random
failures over time.
Condition-Based
maintenance is the
best solution.
Examples: Bearings,
windows, ball-joints.
Accounts for 14% of
all failures.
PATTERN F
Infant Mortality
High rate of initial
failures immediately
after installation.
Random pattern of
failures is observed
through remainder of
life.
Examples: Relays, I/O
cards, TV's
Accounts for 68% of
all failures.
Condition-Based Maintenance
With 89% of our components
displaying random failure patterns
and an undefined life, it doesn't
prevent us from being able
mitigate and/or prevent the
failures.