FYP Course File - Updated

Final Year Project
Course File
Supervisor
Co-supervisor
(if any)
Evaluation
Committee
Project Title
Collaboration
(if any)
Group No.
Reg. No. Name

Student
Reg. No. &
Name
Department of Electrical Engineering

Rachna College of Engineering and
Technology, Gujranwala
FYP Course File Contents
Sr. No. Content
1. Mapping of CLOs with PLOs, Taxonomy Level and Assessment Methods and
their Weightage, Grading Policy etc.
2. Weekly/Fortnightly Meeting Record/Attendance
3. Evaluation/Assessment Record with Rubrics as per Given.
▪ Synopsis Title Defense x 3
▪ Synopsis Report x 1
▪ Progress Presentation and Demonstration – I x 3
▪ Progress Presentation and Demonstration – II x 3
▪ Final Presentation x 3
▪ Final Demonstration x 3
▪ Thesis/Report Evaluation x 1
▪ External Examiner Evaluation x 1
4. Marks Against CLOs/PLOs for FYP Assessments
5. Result Sheet
6. CLOs/PLOs attainment Report (LMS generated SAR file)
7. Course Assessment Report (LMS generated SAR file)
8. Proof of Collaboration/Industrial Linkages (if any)
9. FYP Synopsis Report (approved/signed)
__________________________
Supervisor Signature
Mapping of CLOs with PLOs and Taxonomy Level
Domain &
CLO Learning Outcome (CLO) PLO Remarks (if any)
Level
Demonstrate a sound technical knowledge of Cognitive
1 PLO1
selected project topic. 3. Apply
Identify relevant research literature, analyze
Cognitive
2 problems, and formulate problem definition PLO2
with clear objectives. 5. Evaluate
Demonstrate the ability to review different
design concepts and develop solutions to
Psychomotor
3 engineering problem of significant PLO3
complexity with appropriate consideration/ 4. Articulation
constraints.
Demonstrate ability to investigate problems
in a methodological way, design and conduct
experiments, critical examine and interpret Cognitive
4 PLO4
results to draw valid conclusions, and 5. Evaluate
suggest avenues for future work to selected
project topic.
Demonstrate the ability to use modern
equipment, techniques, and tools for Psychomotor
5 PLO5
investigating, validating, and presenting 4. Articulation
solution to selected project topic.
Identify issues in the societal context and
acknowledge the impact of presented Affective
6 PLO6
solutions using professional practices in 3. Valuing
electrical engineering.
Understand the impact of engineering
solutions in a global, economic, Affective
7 PLO7
environmental and societal context for 3. Valuing
sustainable development.
Practice ethical and professional norms for Affective
8 PLO8
the implementation of engineering projects. 5. Characterization
Work as an individual and as a team
member in formulating solutions to problems Affective
9 PLO9
by integrating knowledge and experience 5. Characterization
gained.
Demonstrate effective communication skills
Affective
10 through presentations, discussions, and PLO10
technical reports. 4. Organization
Manage the project efficiently and timely Affective
11 PLO11
through supervisor guidance. 5. Characterization
Recognize the need of life-long learning in
the broadest context of technological change Affective
12 and have the preparation and ability to PLO12
engage independently in future through 5. Characterization
creative contributions.
Assessment Methods and their Weightage
Sr.
Assessment Method Marks Evaluator(s)
No.
1 Synopsis Title Defense 5 FYP Evaluation Committee
2 Synopsis Report 5 Supervisor
3 Progress Presentation and Demonstration – I 10 FYP Evaluation Committee
4 Progress Presentation and Demonstration – II 10 FYP Evaluation Committee
5 Final Presentation 10 FYP Evaluation Committee
6 Final Demonstration 10 Three Random EED
Faculty Members
7 Thesis/Report Evaluation 10 Supervisor
8 External Examiner Evaluation 40 External Examiner
Total 100
Grading Policy
Grade Threshold
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
F
Weekly/Fortnightly Meeting Record/Attendance
Attendance Against Registration #
Sr. No Date Task Assigned/Remarks
Evaluation Form for FYP Synopsis Title Defense
Group # Project Title
Student1
Group Members
Supervisor: Student2
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3
Marks: 1- Novice 2-Adv. Beginner 3-Apprentice 4-Proficient 5-Distinguished
CLO/ PLO Assessment Criteria
Student1: Student2: Student3:
CLO1/PLO1(Engineering ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO10/PLO10 Organization & Content of ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO6/PLO6 (The Engineer ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Problem Statement & SDGs
& Society) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO2/PLO2 (Problem ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Literature Review
Analysis) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Methodology
(Investigation) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO11/PLO11 (Project ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Planning
Management) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Delivery & Presentation Skills
(Communication) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO9/PLO9 (Individual & ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Work Distribution & Contribution
Team Work) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Total (Out of 5)
CLO1/ CLO2/ CLO3/ CLO4/ CLO5/ CLO6/ CLO7/ CLO8/ CLO9/ CLO10/ CLO11/ CLO12/
Registration No.
PLO1 PLO2 PLO3 PLO4 PLO5 PLO6 PLO7 PLO8 PLO9 PLO10 PLO11 PLO12
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Signature with date: _______________________________
Comments (if any):
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3
Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
& Society) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO2/PLO2 (Problem ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Literature Review
Analysis) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Methodology
(Investigation) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO11/PLO11 (Project ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Planning
Management) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Team Work) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Total (Out of 5)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3
Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
& Society) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO2/PLO2 (Problem ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Literature Review
Analysis) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Methodology
(Investigation) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO11/PLO11 (Project ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Planning
Management) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Team Work) 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Total (Out of 5)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Evaluation Guidelines & Rubric for FYP Synopsis Title Defense
Criteria CLO/PLO Novice Adv. Beginner Apprentice Proficient Distinguished

Subject Knowledge CLO1/PLO1 Student has no Student has little Student has little Student has competent Student has presented
(Engineering knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of full knowledge about
Knowledge) topic/subject. Cannot topic/subject. Cannot topic/subject. Can topic/subject and is at topic/subject. Answers
answer basic answer questions. answer basic questions ease with information. to questions are
questions. only. Can answer questions strengthen by
but without rationalization and
rationalization and explanation.
explanation.
Organization & CLO10/PLO10 Student is clueless Information is Information articulated Information articulated Information articulated
Content of (Communication) about the content of arranged in confused clearly but it is difficult clearly and the flow is clearly and is
Presentation his presentation. and unstructured way. to follow the reasonable. All key organized in a
Key points are not presentation. All key points are covered structured way with
covered. The contents points are covered but but limited use of logical flow between
are hard to understand no use of charts, charts, graphs, figures parts. All key points
and interpret. graphs, figures etc., to etc., to explain salient are covered.
explain salient points. points. Presentation is
attractive by effective
use of charts, graphs,
figures etc., to explain
salient points.
Problem Statement & CLO6/PLO6 Problem statement Problem statement is Problem statement is Problem statement is Problem statement is
SDGs (The Engineer & is not stated at all or stated but not entirely stated but lacks stated and covers stated and covers
Society) vaguely stated. clear. Seems novice necessary justification necessary justification sufficient justification.
Description of unmet and can answer basic in light of the literature
with reference to the New reader can clearly
need or problem is questions only. review. literature review. understand its value
missing. Details of the unmet and context. Details of
need or problem are unmet needs are there
not so clear. and clearly described.
Meeting at least one of the UN’s SDGs is mandatory requirement for the FYP.
Literature Review CLO2/PLO2 Literature review is Literature review is Literature review The review provides a Literature review is
(Problem Analysis) not written or written in an ordinary provides a reasonable good background and excellently written
written in a vague way. The review description of the details of the literature. according to the
form. material i.e., research project background However, it is not scientific writing
papers or web material and its significance but written in scientific standards and covers
is not at all clear to a can be improved. writing standards. maximum of the
reader who is Number of research research papers/web
unfamiliar. papers/web material material related to
needs to be added project.
more.
Project Methodology CLO4/PLO4 The methodology Some aspects of the The methods, The methods, The methods,
(Investigation) taken to solve the methodology is approaches, tools, approaches, tools, approaches, tools,
problem is not discussed briefly but techniques, algorithms, techniques, algorithms, techniques, algorithms,
discussed or much of the or other aspects of the or other aspects of the or other aspects of the
written in a vague description is left out. methodology methodology are methodology are
form. are discussed but not sufficiently discussed excellently discussed
in a convincing but can be improved with sufficient details
manner. Much is left to further. and supporting
the readers’ information.
imagination.
Project Planning CLO11/PLO11 Gantt chart or project Gantt chart or project Gantt chart or project Gantt chart or project Gantt chart or project
(Project Management) schedule is not schedule is shown but schedule is shown but schedule is shown but schedule clearly states
included or shown in a lacks necessary timeline is not clearly can be improved the timeline of the
vague form. information. described. further. project.
Delivery & CLO10/PLO10 Presentation was not Poor communication Ordinary Good communication Excellent
Presentation Skills (Communication) clear at all. Language skills. Poor confidence. communication skills. skills. Confident. communication
was not appropriate. Did not answer any Normal confidence but Successfully deliver the skills. Highly confident.
raised question. hardly deliver the technical theme of the Successfully deliver the
technical theme of the presentation. technical theme of the
presentation. Answered almost all presentation.
Answered a few raised the raised question Answered all the
questions. raised questions.
Work Distribution & CLO9/PLO9 Work distribution & Work distribution & Work distribution & Work distribution & Work distribution &
Contribution (Individual & Team contribution among contribution are shown contribution are shown contribution are contribution are
Work) group members are but not very clear. but more clarity is shown. Work division shown. Work division
not shown or provided needed. among group members among group members
in a vague form. are not uniform. are very clear and
uniform.
Evaluation Form for FYP Synopsis Report
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3
Marks
1- Novice 2-Adv. Beginner 3-Apprentice 4-Proficient 5-Distinguished
CLO6/PLO6 (The Engineer ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
& Society) 1 2 3 4 5
CLO2/PLO2 (Problem ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Literature Review
Analysis) 1 2 3 4 5
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Methodology
(Investigation) 1 2 3 4 5
CLO7/PLO7 (Environment Intended Outcomes & Applications ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
& Sustainability) in Terms of SDGs 1 2 3 4 5
CLO11/PLO11 (Project ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Planning
Management) 1 2 3 4 5
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
References & Citations
(Communication) 1 2 3 4 5
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Writing, Grammar & Formatting
Total (Out of 5)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Evaluation Guidelines & Rubric for FYP Synopsis Report

Problem Statement & CLO6/PLO6 Problem statement Problem statement is Problem statement is Problem statement is Problem statement is
SDGs (The Engineer & is not stated at all or stated but not entirely stated but lacks stated and covers stated and covers
Society) vaguely stated. clear. Seems novice necessary justificationnecessary justification sufficient justification.
Description of unmet and can answer basic in light of the literature
with reference to the New reader can clearly
need or problem is questions only. review. literature review. understand its value
missing. Details of the unmet and context. Details of
need or problem are unmet needs are there
not so clear. and clearly described.
Literature Review CLO2/PLO2 Literature review is Literature review is Literature review The review provides a Literature review is
(Problem Analysis) not written or written in an ordinary provides a reasonable good background and excellently written
form. material i.e., research project background However, it is not scientific writing
papers or web material and its significance but written in scientific standards and covers
is not at all clear to a can be improved. writing standards. maximum of the
reader who is Number of research research papers/web
unfamiliar. papers/web material material related to
needs to be added project.
more.
Project Methodology CLO4/PLO4 The methodology Some aspects of the The methods, The methods, The methods,
(Investigation) taken to solve the methodology is approaches, tools, approaches, tools,
approaches, tools,
problem is not discussed briefly but techniques, algorithms, techniques, algorithms,
techniques, algorithms,
discussed or much of the or other aspects of the or other aspects of the
or other aspects of the
written in a vague description is left out.
methodology methodology aremethodology are
form. are discussed but not sufficiently discussed
excellently discussed
in a convincing but can be improved
with sufficient details
manner. Much is left to further. and supporting
the readers’ information.
imagination.
Intended Outcomes & CLO7/PLO7 Intended outcomes & Intended outcomes & Intended outcomes & Intended outcomes & Intended outcomes &
Applications in (Environment & applications are not applications are applications are applications are applications are
Terms of SDGs Sustainability) discussed or discussed discussed without discussed but discussed. discussed.
in a generic/vague considering the impact demonstrate little Demonstrate good Demonstrate deep
form. of proposed understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the
solution/project in impact of proposed impact of proposed impact of proposed
terms of solution/project in solution/project in solution/project in
environmental & terms of terms of terms of
sustainable contexts. environmental & environmental & environmental &
sustainable contexts. sustainable contexts. sustainable contexts.
Project Planning CLO11/PLO11 Gantt chart or project Gantt chart or project Gantt chart or project Gantt chart or project Gantt chart or project
(Project Management) schedule is not schedule is shown but schedule is shown but schedule is shown but schedule clearly states
included or shown in a lacks necessary timeline is not clearly can be improved the timeline of the
vague form. information. described. further. project.
References & The report does not The report follows a The report follows a The report follows a The report follows a
Citations include any citations referencing style that referencing style that referencing style that referencing style that
CLO10/PLO10 and/or a reference list. does not comply with mostly complies with complies with the IEEE complies with the IEEE
(Communication) the IEEE style, or only the IEEE style, though style, and the in-text style, and the in-text
includes either the in- the in-text citations are citations are mostly citations are made
text citations or the not made purposefully. purposeful. purposefully.
reference list.
Writing, Grammar & CLO10/PLO10 Writing is not Writing needs Writing is acceptable Writing is overall clear. Writing is concise and
Formatting (Communication) understandable. significant editing and but not entirely clear. Occasional spellings easy to read. Almost no
A lot of spelling and improvement. Occasional spellings and grammatical spelling and/or
grammatical errors in Frequent spellings and grammatical errors that have only grammatical errors in
the report. and grammatical errors in the report. minor impact on the report.
Improper format and errors that impede Formatting style needs flow of reading. Formatting style is
style. the reading flow. some improvements. Formatting style is proper.
Formatting style needs almost proper.
many improvements.
Evaluation Form for FYP Progress Presentation and Demonstration – I
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3

Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Investigation Level & Dimension
(Investigation) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ System Design/Development ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Develop. of Solution) Approach/Detail 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO11/PLO11 (Project ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Timeline
Management) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Contribution in Team Work
Team Work) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3

Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Investigation) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO11/PLO11 (Project ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Timeline
Management) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Team Work) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3

Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Investigation) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO11/PLO11 (Project ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Timeline
Management) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Team Work) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Evaluation Guidelines & Rubric for FYP Progress Presentation - I

explanation.
Investigation Level & CLO4/PLO4 Student does not Student identifies the Student investigates Student is focused in Student is creative and
Dimension (Investigation) investigate the topic or aspects of research in the chosen topic/area investigating the topic focused in
is unable to identify the chosen topic/area, and identifies the and identifies the investigating the
the aspects of research but the investigated aspects of research aspects of research topic and identifies
in the chosen dimension is wrong. that are either too that are explored significant aspects of
topic/area. narrow for tangible previously (or the research that were
contribution, or too currently), merit the not explored
wide without much further investigation. previously.
focus.
System CLO3/PLO3 System design System design System design System design System design
Design/Development (Design/Develop. of approach/detail is approach/detail is approach/detail is approach/detail is approach/detail is
Approach/Detail Solution) wrong. vaguely discussed. demonstrated with demonstrated with demonstrated with
Understanding is poor understanding. good understanding. excellent
almost not clear. Low-level components Low-level understanding.
No low-level and subcomponents components and Low-level
components and are described but they subcomponents are components and
subcomponents are are missing the described with subcomponents are
stated. required details. adequate details. described with very
good details.
Timeline CLO11/PLO11 Ignore the timeline as Timeline as defined in Timeline as defined in Timeline as defined in All milestones are
(Project Management) defined in the project the project the project the project completed according
proposal/synopsis. proposal/synopsis is proposal/synopsis is proposal/synopsis is to the timeline defined
Milestones have not not followed. Only one followed for some followed for the most in project
been achieved. or two milestones have parts. Some of the parts. Almost all proposal/synopsis.
been achieved. milestones have been milestones have been
achieved. achieved.
was not appropriate. Did not answer any Normal confidence but Successfully deliver skills. Highly confident.
raised question. hardly deliver the the technical theme of Successfully deliver
technical theme of the the presentation. the technical theme of
presentation. Answered almost all the presentation.
Contribution in Team CLO9/PLO9 Fail to perform Perform assigned tasks Perform assigned tasks Perform all assigned Perform all assigned
Work (Individual & Team assigned tasks, remain but needs many but sometimes needs tasks, attend team tasks very efficiently,
Work) mostly absent during reminders, attend reminders, attend meetings regularly, attend all team
meetings, do not have meetings occasionally meetings regularly but and usually participate meetings, participate
any constructive but generally do not participate not very effectively and reliably. passionately and
contribution when say anything constructively. enthusiastically.
present, or usually rely constructive, or
on others to do the eventually expect
work. others to do his/her
work.
Evaluation Form for FYP Progress Presentation and Demonstration – II
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3

Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Investigation) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Design Detail with Constraints
Develop. of Solution) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO5/PLO5 (Modern ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Modern Tool/Technique Usage
Tool Usage) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO11/PLO11 (Project ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Timeline
Management) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO9/PLO9 (Individual ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
& Team Work) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3

Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Investigation) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
CLO5/PLO5 (Modern ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Tool Usage) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO11/PLO11 (Project ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Timeline
Management) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
& Team Work) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3

Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Investigation) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
CLO5/PLO5 (Modern ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Tool Usage) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO11/PLO11 (Project ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Timeline
Management) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
& Team Work) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Evaluation Guidelines & Rubric for FYP Progress Presentation - II

explanation.
Investigation Level & CLO4/PLO4 Student does not Student identifies the Student investigates Student is focused in Student is creative and
Dimension (Investigation) investigate the topic or aspects of research in the chosen topic/area investigating the topic focused in
is unable to identify the chosen topic/area, and identifies the and identifies the investigating the
the aspects of research but the investigated aspects of research aspects of research topic and identifies
in the chosen dimension is wrong. that are either too that are explored significant aspects of
topic/area. narrow for tangible previously (or the research that were
contribution, or too currently), merit the not explored
wide without much further investigation. previously.
focus.
Design Detail with CLO3/PLO3 Has no understanding Show little Show understanding of Show good Show deep
Constraints (Design/Develop. of of the design. understanding of the the design. Lacks in understanding of the understanding of the
Solution) design. Lack of realistic alternative design design. Adequate use design. Consider all
constraints in the concepts. Marginal use of realistic constraints realistic constraints
design. of realistic constraints which are reflected in and the final design are
in the design. the final design. optimized.
Modern CLO5/PLO5 No appropriate or Appropriate modern Appropriate modern Appropriate modern Appropriate modern
Tool/Technique Usage (Modern Tool Usage) inappropriate modern tool/technique was tool/technique was tools/techniques were tools/techniques were
tool/technique was used but demonstrate used but demonstrate used substantially in used extensively in the
used. no understanding. little understanding. the project. project. Demonstrate
Demonstrate good deep understanding.
understanding. New technique/
software/language/
algorithm was also
learned as per need.
Timeline CLO11/PLO11 Ignore the timeline as Timeline as defined in Timeline as defined in Timeline as defined in All milestones are
(Project Management) defined in the project the project the project the project completed according
proposal/synopsis. proposal/synopsis is proposal/synopsis is proposal/synopsis is to the timeline defined
Milestones have not not followed. Only one followed for some followed for the most in project
been achieved. or two milestones have parts. Some of the parts. Almost all proposal/synopsis.
been achieved. milestones have been milestones have been
achieved. achieved.
was not appropriate. Did not answer any Normal confidence but Successfully deliver skills. Highly confident.
raised question. hardly deliver the the technical theme of Successfully deliver
technical theme of the the presentation. the technical theme of
presentation. Answered almost all the presentation.
Work (Individual & Team assigned tasks, remain but needs many but sometimes needs tasks, attend team tasks very efficiently,
Work) mostly absent during reminders, attend reminders, attend meetings regularly, attend all team
meetings, do not have meetings occasionally meetings regularly but and usually participate meetings, participate
any constructive but generally do not participate not very effectively and reliably. passionately and
contribution when say anything constructively. enthusiastically.
present, or usually rely constructive, or
on others to do the eventually expect
work. others to do his/her
work.
Evaluation Form for FYP Final Presentation
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3
Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ Design & Implementation and/or ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Develop. of Solution) Hardware/Prototype 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
CLO4/PLO4 (Investigation) Interpret Findings
2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO5/PLO5 (Modern Tool Modern Tool/Technique Usage and/or ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Usage) Firmware/Simulation 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO6/PLO6 Solution Impact in Terms of Societal ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(The Engineer & Society) Context 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO7/PLO7 (Environment & Solution Impact in Terms of ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Sustainability) Environmental & Sustainable Contexts 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
CLO8/PLO8 (Ethics) Originality
Reject Accept: 6 8 10 Reject Accept: 6 8 10 Reject Accept: 6 8 10
Team Work) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO11/PLO11 (Project Completeness of Project & ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Management) Timeline 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO12/PLO12 (Lifelong ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Novelty, Creativity and Future Impact
Learning) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Registration No. CLO1 CLO2 CLO3 CLO4 CLO5 CLO6 CLO7 CLO8 CLO9 CLO10 CLO11 CLO12
Student1: ✘
Student2: ✘
Student3: ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3
Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Team Work) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO12/PLO12 (Lifelong ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Learning) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Student1: ✘
Student2: ✘
Student3: ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3
Subject Knowledge
Knowledge) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Team Work) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
CLO12/PLO12 (Lifelong ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Learning) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Student1: ✘
Student2: ✘
Student3: ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Evaluation Guidelines & Rubric for FYP Final Presentation

answer basic questions. answer questions. answer basic questions ease with information. to questions are
only. Can answer questions strengthen by
explanation.
Design & CLO3/PLO3 Has no understanding Shows little Shows understanding Shows good Show deep
Implementation (Design/ of the design. No understanding of the of the design. Lacks in understanding of the understanding of the
and/or Develop. of Implementation of design. Lack of realistic alternative design design. Adequate use of design. Consider all
Hardware/Prototype Solution) system/solution. constraints in the concepts. Marginal use realistic constraints realistic constraints and
And/or no prototype. design. No of realistic constraints which are reflected in the final design are
Implementation of in the design. the final design. optimized.
system/solution. System/solution is System/solution is System/solution is
And/or no prototype. partially implemented. implemented but has successfully
And/or prototype is some issues. And/or implemented. And/or
partially complete. prototype is prototype is
demonstrated with successfully
some issues. demonstrated.
Interpret Findings CLO4/PLO4 Student tries but fail to Student fails to Student provides little Student provides a Student provides a
(Investigation) solve the problem. interpret findings to or some wrong logical but incomplete logical interpretation of
No findings. reach a conclusion but interpretations of interpretation of research conducted, and
solves the problem research conducted but research conducted but clearly solves the
vaguely. solves the solves the problem. problem.
problem.
Tool/Technique (Modern Tool inappropriate modern tool/technique was tool/technique was tools/techniques were tools/techniques were
Usage for Proposed Usage) tool/technique was used but demonstrate used but demonstrate used substantially in the used extensively in the
System/Solution used. no understanding. little understanding. project. Demonstrate project. Demonstrate
and/or And/or no simulation. And/or no simulation. And/or no simulation. good understanding. deep understanding.
Firmware/Simulation And/or design is New technique/
partially simulated. software/language/
algorithm was also
And/or design is fully
simulated.
Solution Impact in CLO6/PLO6 Proposed Do not clear with the Demonstrate little Demonstrate good Demonstrate deep
Terms of Societal (The Engineer & solution/project does impacts of proposed understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the
Context Society) not have any impact in solution/project in impacts of proposed impacts of proposed impacts of proposed
terms of societal terms of societal solution/project in solution/project in solution/project in
contexts. contexts. terms of societal terms of societal terms of societal
contexts. contexts. The impact is contexts. The impact is
partially analyzed. deeply analyzed.
Terms of (Environment & solution/project does positive impacts of understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the
Environmental & Sustainability) not have any positive proposed positive impacts of positive impacts of positive impacts of
Sustainable Contexts impact in terms of solution/project in proposed proposed proposed
environmental & terms of environmental solution/project in solution/project in solution/project in
sustainable contexts. & sustainable contexts. terms of environmental terms of environmental terms of environmental
& sustainable contexts. & sustainable contexts. & sustainable contexts.
The impact is partially The impact is deeply
analyzed. analyzed.
Originality CLO8/PLO8 Proposed design/solution/system is 100% copied Some parts of the Student adapts other’s New and innovative
(Ethics) or most parts of the proposed design/solution/ proposed ideas but creates own approach to the
system is totally copied. design/solution/system design/solution/system. design/solution/system.
are copied. Some Student has created Student has created
originality is shown. own product. own product.
If proposed design/solution/system is found to be 100% copied or most parts of the proposed design/solution/
system is totally copied, the FYP will be rejected. Achievement of this CLO/PLO is mandatory for FYP. Accepted project will
be evaluated in between 6-10 marks against this criterion.
Work (Individual & assigned tasks, remain but needs many but sometimes needs tasks, attend team tasks very efficiently,
Team Work) mostly absent during reminders, attend reminders, attend meetings regularly, and attend all team
meetings, do not have meetings occasionally meetings regularly but usually participate meetings, participate
any constructive but generally do not say participate not very effectively and reliably. passionately and
contribution when anything constructive, constructively. enthusiastically.
present, or usually rely or eventually expect
on others to do the others to do his/her
work. work.
was not appropriate. Did not answer any Normal confidence but Successfully deliver the skills. Highly confident.
raised question. hardly deliver the technical theme of the Successfully deliver the
technical theme of the presentation. technical theme of the
presentation. Answered Answered almost all the presentation.
a few raised questions. raised question Answered all the raised
questions.
Completeness of CLO11/PLO11 The project could not Some of the major Major features of the Most features of the The project is
Project & (Project be completed. features are completed project are completed. project are completed, completed in the timely
Timeline Management) but the timeline for However, the timeline and the timeline as manner with all features
project was not was not followed. defined in the implemented according
followed. proposal/synopsis was to the timeline defined
followed. in project
proposal/synopsis.
Novelty, Creativity CLO12/PLO12 The proposed The proposed The proposed The proposed solution The proposed solution
and Future Impact (Lifelong Learning) solution/project is not solution/project is solution/project has is novel and identify is novel and identify
novel and doesn’t uninspired and little creative elements some future impact. significant future
identify future impact. straightforward work for making a productive Project has some impact.
The project appears with little to no creative contribution and creative elements and Project has several
trivial. contribution and doesn’t identify has a potential for creative elements and
doesn’t identify future significant future making a productive has a clear potential for
impact. impact. contribution. making a productive
contribution.
Evaluation Form for FYP Final Demonstration
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3

CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Quality
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Difficulty Level of Project
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Accuracy
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Demonstration Skills
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3

CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Quality
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Accuracy
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3

CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Project Quality
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Accuracy
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Communication) 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10
Total (out of 10)
Registration No.
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Evaluation Guidelines & Rubric for FYP Final Demonstration

Project Quality CLO3/PLO3 Student disregards Student neglects Details are overlooked Some craftsmanship and Superior craftsmanship
(Hardware/Prototype (Design/ Develop. details and work is details. Poor and project lacks in attention to detail is and attention to detail is
Based Project) of Solution) sloppy. Extremely poor fabrication/assembly. fabrication/assembly evident. Good quality in evident. Appealing in
fabrication/assembly. Improper materials quality. Proper fabrication/assembly. quality of
Improper materials were used in majority materials were used on Proper materials were fabrication/assembly.
were used in all parts of of project. some parts of the used on majority parts Proper materials
the project. project. of the project. were used for entire
project.
OR OR OR OR OR OR
Project Quality in Extremely low quality Low quality project. No Average quality project Good quality project. High quality project.
Terms of Research project. No research research outcomes. with little research Research outcomes can Research outcomes can
Outcomes (Simulation outcomes. outcomes. Difficult to be published by be published by journal
Based Project) be published. conference paper. paper.
Difficulty Level of CLO3/PLO3 Easy/beginner level Below average level Average/intermediate Above average level Expert level project.
Project (Design/Develop. project required project. Do not meet level project. Meet project. Meet Exceed expectations for
of Solution) minimum effort. student’s skill level. student’s skill level on expectations for student’s skill level.
some extent. student’s skill level.
Accuracy CLO3/PLO3 The system is not The system is not The system is The system is functional The system is fully
(Design/Develop. functional and failed to correctly functional or functional but produces but produces accurate functional and produces
of Solution) produce the accurate not all the features are accurate results for results for most of accurate results against
results. working. The system some of the features the features that were all the features that
execution led to that were implemented. implemented. were implemented.
inaccurate or Demonstrate how the
incomplete results. real world problem was
solved.
Demonstration Skills CLO10/PLO10 Failed to demonstrate. Demonstrated poorly Demonstrated in an Demonstrated well how Clearly and effectively
(Communication) Has no understanding how the system works ordinary way how the the system works and demonstrated how the
how the system works and how system fulfills system works and how how system fulfills most system works and how
and how system fulfills its functional system fulfills some of of its functional system satisfy all its
its functional requirements. its functional requirements. functional
requirements. requirements. requirements.
Evaluation Form for FYP Thesis/Report
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3
Marks
2- Novice 4-Adv. Beginner 6-Apprentice 8-Proficient 10-Distinguished
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Abstract & Introduction
CLO2/PLO2 (Problem Literature Review & Problem ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Analysis) Definition 2 4 6 8 10
CLO4/PLO4 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Methodology
(Investigation) 2 4 6 8 10
CLO3/PLO3 (Design/ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Detailed Design & Architecture
Develop. of Solution) 2 4 6 8 10
CLO5/PLO5 (Modern Tool ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Implementation & Testing
Usage) 2 4 6 8 10
CLO4/PLO4 Results & Discussions, Conclusion ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
(Investigation) & Future Work 2 4 6 8 10
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
References & Citations
CLO10/PLO10 ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐
Writing, Grammar & Formatting
Amount/Extent of Plagiarism (Less ☐ ☐
CLO8/PLO8 (Ethics)
than 19%) No, then Thesis Rejected Yes, then Thesis Accepted: 10
Total (out of 10)
Student1: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student2: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Student3: ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Evaluation Guidelines & Rubric for FYP Thesis/Report

Abstract & CLO10/PLO10 Not written or written Written in a poor way Written in an ordinary Written in a nice way. Excellently written
Introduction (Communication) in a vague form. and give no clarity to way. Provide Provide good summary according to the
reader who is not reasonable and outline of the scientific writing
much familiar to topic. description of the project/thesis. standards. Provide
project/thesis but good summary and
can be improved. outline of the
project/thesis.
Literature Review & CLO2/PLO2 Literature review is Literature review is Literature review The review provides a Literature review is
Problem Definition (Problem Analysis) not written or written in an ordinary provides a reasonable good background and excellently written
form. Problem material i.e., research project background However, it is not scientific writing
definition papers or web material and its significance but written in scientific standards. Problem
is not stated at all or is not at all clear to a can be improved. writing standards. definition is stated and
vaguely stated. reader who is Problem definition is Problem definition is covers sufficient
unfamiliar. Problem stated but lacks stated and covers justification. New
definition is stated but necessary justification necessary justification reader can clearly
not entirely clear. in light of the literature with reference to the understand its value
review. literature review. and context.
Methodology CLO4/PLO4 The methodology Some aspects of the The methods, The methods, The methods,
(Investigation) taken to solve the methodology is approaches, tools, approaches, tools, approaches, tools,
problem is not discussed briefly but techniques, algorithms, techniques, algorithms, techniques, algorithms,
discussed or much of the or other aspects of the or other aspects of the or other aspects of the
written in a vague description is left out. methodology are methodology are methodology are
form. discussed but not in a sufficiently discussed excellently discussed
convincing manner. but can be improved with sufficient details
Much is left to the further. and supporting
readers’ imagination. information.
Detailed Design & CLO3/PLO3 System design and System design and System design and System design and System design and
Architecture (Design/Develop. of architecture details are architecture details are architecture details are architecture details are architecture details are
Solution) not included at all or included but entirely in included in an ordinary included in a good way. included in excellent
vaguely discussed. poor way. No low-level way. Low-level Low-level way. Low-level
components and components and components and components and
subcomponents are subcomponents are subcomponents are subcomponents are
stated. Sub-systems described but they are described with described with very
architecture is not missing the required adequate details. Sub- good details. Sub-
described. details. Similarly, sub- systems architecture is systems architecture is
systems architecture is also clear but still also added in an
also not clear and is require some excellent way along
missing necessary improvements. with essential
information. diagrams.
Implementation & CLO5/PLO5 System System System System System
Testing (Modern Tool Usage) implementation and implementation is implementation is implementation is implementation is
testing is not included but entirely in included in ordinary added in a good way. added in excellent way
included at all or poor way. Very little way. However, testing However, system and provides all the
vaguely stated. description is added. is not adequate enough testing is performed necessary aspects for
No system testing is to test the entire for some cases and the reader. System
performed. system. details are included. testing is performed in
Further very good way
improvements are regarding the number
required regarding the and quality of test
number and quality of cases. Details are
test cases. included.
Results & CLO4/PLO4 Not included at all or Results are Results are discussed Results are discussed Results are discussed
Discussions, (Investigation) vaguely stated. briefly discussed with few supporting with supporting figures comprehensively with
Conclusion & Future without supporting figures and graphics. and graphics. supporting figures and
Work figures and graphics. Conclusions are largely Conclusions are drawn graphics.
Conclusions are not qualitative rather than quantitatively and set Conclusions are drawn
clearly drawn. quantitative. of recommendations quantitatively as well
for future work is also as qualitatively and
provided. provide a concise
summary of all the
essential results. A
clear and complete set
of recommendations
for follow-up work is
also provided.
References & CLO10/PLO10 The report does not The report follows a The report follows a The report follows a The report follows a
Citations (Communication) include any citations referencing style that referencing style that referencing style that referencing style that
and/or a reference list. does not comply with mostly complies with complies with the IEEE complies with the IEEE
the IEEE style, or only the IEEE style, though style, and the in-text style, and the in-text
includes either the in- the in-text citations are citations are mostly citations are made
text citations or the not made purposefully. purposeful. purposefully.
reference list.
Writing, Grammar & CLO10/PLO10 Writing is not Writing is in need of Writing is acceptable Writing is overall clear. Writing is concise and
Formatting (Communication) understandable. significant editing and but not entirely clear. Occasional spellings easy to read. Almost no
A lot of spelling and improvement. Occasional spellings and grammatical spelling and/or
grammatical errors in Frequent spellings and grammatical errors that have only grammatical errors in
the report. and grammatical errors in the report. minor impact on the report.
Improper format and errors that impede Formatting style needs flow of reading. Formatting style is
style. the reading flow. some improvements. Formatting style is proper.
Formatting style needs almost proper.
many improvements.
Amount/Extent of CLO8/PLO8 Plagiarism should be less than 19% for the acceptance of thesis otherwise rejected.
Plagiarism (Ethics) Achievement of this CLO/PLO is mandatory for FYP thesis evaluation. Accepted thesis will get full marks against this
criterion. Plagiarism report generated by Turnitin software must be attached at the end of thesis.
Evaluation Form for External Examiner
Student1
Group Members
(Reg. # & Name)
Student3
CLO1/PLO1 Subject Knowledge ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
CLO2/PLO2 Literature Review & Problem Definition ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
System Design/Development, Quality, Level
CLO3/PLO3 ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
of Difficulty & Accuracy
CLO4/PLO4 Interpret Findings ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
CLO5/PLO5 Modern Tool/Technique Usage ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
CLO6/PLO6 Solution Impact in Terms of Societal Context ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
CLO7/PLO7 Solution Impact in Terms of Environmental
& Sustainable Contexts ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
CLO8/PLO8
Originality of Work ⃝ ㉔㉜㊵ ⃝ ㉔㉜㊵ ⃝ ㉔㉜㊵
Rejected Accepted Rejected Accepted Rejected Accepted
CLO9/PLO9 Contribution in Team Work ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
CLO10/PLO10 Project Demonstration ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
CLO11/PLO11 Completeness of Project & Timeline ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
CLO12/PLO12 Novelty, Creativity and Future Impact ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵ ⑧ ⑯ ㉔㉜㊵
Total (out of 40)
Student1:
Student2:
Student3:
Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Comments (if any):
Evaluation Guidelines & Rubric for External Examiner

answer basic questions. answer questions. answer basic questions ease with information. to questions are
only. Can answer questions strengthen by
explanation.
Literature Review & CLO2/PLO2 Literature review is Literature review is Literature review The review provides a Literature review is
Problem Definition (Problem Analysis) not written or written in an ordinary provides a reasonable good background and excellently written
form. Problem material i.e., research project background and However, it is not scientific writing
definition is not stated papers or web material its significance but can written in scientific standards. Problem
at all or vaguely stated. is not at all clear to a be improved. writing standards. definition is stated and
reader who is Problem definition is Problem definition is covers sufficient
unfamiliar. Problem stated but lacks stated and covers justification. New
definition is stated but necessary justification necessary justification reader can clearly
not entirely clear. in light of the literature with reference to the understand its value
review. literature review. and context.
System CLO3/PLO3 Has no understanding Shows little Shows understanding Shows good Show deep
Design/Development, (Design/Develop. of the system design/ understanding of the of the system design/ understanding of the understanding of the
Quality, Level of of Solution) development. system design/ development but lacks system design/ system design/
Difficulty & Accuracy Extremely low quality development. essential information. development. Good development.
project. Require Low quality project. Average quality project. quality project. Meet High quality project.
minimum effort. Failed Does not meet student’s Meet student’s skill expectations for Require sound
to produce the accurate skill level. Execution led level on some extent. student’s skill level. expertise. Produce
results. to inaccurate or Produce accurate Produce accurate accurate results against
incomplete results. results for some of the results for most of all the features that
features that were the features that were were implemented.
implemented. implemented.
Interpret Findings CLO4/PLO4 Student tries but fail to Student fails to Student provides little Student provides a Student provides a
(Investigation) solve the problem. interpret findings to or some wrong logical but incomplete logical interpretation of
No findings. reach a conclusion but interpretations of interpretation of research conducted, and
solves the problem research conducted but research conducted but clearly solves the
vaguely. solves the solves the problem. problem.
problem.
Tool/Technique (Modern Tool inappropriate modern tool/technique was tool/technique was tools/techniques were tools/techniques were
Usage Usage) tool/technique was used but demonstrate used but demonstrate used substantially in the used extensively in the
used. no understanding. little understanding. project. Demonstrate project. Demonstrate
good understanding. deep understanding.
New technique/
software/language/
algorithm was also
Terms of Societal (The Engineer & solution/project does impacts of proposed understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the
Context Society) not have any impact in solution/project in impacts of proposed impacts of proposed impacts of proposed
terms of societal terms of societal solution/project in solution/project in solution/project in
contexts. contexts. terms of societal terms of societal terms of societal
contexts. Detail is not contexts. The impact is contexts. The impact is
included in FYP report. partially analyzed, and deeply analyzed, and
detail is included in FYP detail is included in FYP
report. report.
Terms of (Environment & solution/project does positive impacts of understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the
Environmental & Sustainability) not have any positive proposed positive impacts of positive impacts of positive impacts of
Sustainable Contexts impact in terms of solution/project in proposed proposed proposed
environmental & terms of environmental solution/project in solution/project in solution/project in
sustainable contexts. & sustainable contexts. terms of environmental terms of environmental terms of environmental
& sustainable contexts. & sustainable contexts. & sustainable contexts.
Detail is not included in
The impact is partially The impact is deeply
FYP report. analyzed, and detail is analyzed, and detail is
included in FYP report. included in FYP report.
Originality of Work CLO8/PLO8 Proposed design/solution/system is 100% copied Some parts of the Student adapts other’s New and innovative
(Ethics) or most parts of the proposed design/solution/ proposed design/ ideas but creates own approach to the
system is totally copied. solution/system are design/solution/ design/solution/
copied. Some originality system. Student has system. Student has
is shown. created own product. created own product.
If at any stage proposed design/solution/system is found to be 100% copied or most parts of the proposed
design/solution/system is totally copied, the FYP will be rejected. Achievement of this CLO/PLO is mandatory for FYP.
Accepted project will be evaluated in between 24-40 marks against this criterion.
Work (Individual & assigned tasks, remain but needs many but sometimes needs tasks, attend team tasks very efficiently,
Team Work) mostly absent during reminders, attend reminders, attend meetings regularly, and attend all team
meetings, do not have meetings occasionally meetings regularly but usually participate meetings, participate
any constructive but generally do not say participate not very effectively and reliably. passionately and
contribution when anything constructive, constructively. enthusiastically.
present, or usually rely or eventually expect
on others to do the others to do his/her
work. work.
Project CLO10/PLO10 Failed to demonstrate. Demonstrated poorly Demonstrated in an Demonstrated well how Clearly and effectively
Demonstration (Communication) Has no understanding how the system works ordinary way how the the system works and demonstrated how the
how the system works and how system fulfills system works and how how system fulfills most system works and how
and how system fulfills its functional system fulfills some of of its functional system satisfy all its
its functional requirements. its functional requirements. functional
requirements. requirements. requirements.
Completeness of CLO11/PLO11 The project could not Some of the major Major features of the Most features of the The project is
Project & (Project be completed. features are completed project are completed. project are completed, completed in the timely
Timeline Management) but the timeline for However, the timeline and the timeline as manner with all features
project was not was not followed. defined in the implemented according
followed. proposal/synopsis was to the timeline defined
followed. in project
proposal/synopsis.
Novelty, Creativity CLO12/PLO12 The proposed The proposed The proposed The proposed solution The proposed solution
and Future Impact (Lifelong Learning) solution/project is not solution/project is solution/project has is novel and identify is novel and identify
novel and doesn’t uninspired and little creative elements some future impact. significant future
identify future impact. straightforward work for making a productive Project has some impact.
The project appears with little to no creative contribution and creative elements and Project has several
trivial. contribution and doesn’t identify has a potential for creative elements and
doesn’t identify future significant future making a productive has a clear potential for
impact. impact. contribution. making a productive
contribution.
Distribution of Marks Against each CLO/PLO for FYP Assessments
Student1: _____________________
CLO/PLO Wise Marks Distribution
Obtained
Assessment Method PLO1 PLO2 PLO3 PLO4 PLO5 PLO6 PLO7 PLO8 PLO9 PLO10 PLO11 PLO12
Marks
7.949 5.779 15.934 10.883 6.768 5.569 4.944 5.34 7.949 15.832 8.662 4.23
Synopsis Title Defense 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Synopsis Report 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Progress Presentation and
Demonstration – I
10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Demonstration – II
10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Final Presentation 10 ✘
Final Demonstration 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Thesis/Report Evaluation 10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
External Examiner
40
Evaluation
Obtained Marks
Student2: _____________________
Obtained
Marks
7.949 5.779 15.934 10.883 6.768 5.569 4.944 5.34 7.949 15.832 8.662 4.23

Demonstration – I
10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
External Examiner
40
Evaluation
Obtained Marks
Student3: _____________________
Obtained
Marks
7.949 5.779 15.934 10.883 6.768 5.569 4.944 5.34 7.949 15.832 8.662 4.23

Demonstration – I
10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
10 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
External Examiner
40
Evaluation
Obtained Marks
Result Sheet
CLOs/PLOs attainment Report (LMS generated SAR file)
Course Assessment Report (LMS generated SAR file)
Proof of Collaboration/Industrial Linkages (if any)
FYP Synopsis Report (approved/signed)

FYP Course File - Updated

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FYP Course File - Updated

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Year Project

Reg. No. Name

Department of Electrical Engineering

their Weightage, Grading Policy etc.

2. Weekly/Fortnightly Meeting Record/Attendance

3. Evaluation/Assessment Record with Rubrics as per Given.

▪ Synopsis Title Defense x 3

▪ Progress Presentation and Demonstration – I x 3

▪ Progress Presentation and Demonstration – II x 3

▪ External Examiner Evaluation x 1

4. Marks Against CLOs/PLOs for FYP Assessments

6. CLOs/PLOs attainment Report (LMS generated SAR file)

7. Course Assessment Report (LMS generated SAR file)

8. Proof of Collaboration/Industrial Linkages (if any)

9. FYP Synopsis Report (approved/signed)

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Criteria CLO/PLO Novice Adv. Beginner Apprentice Proficient Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Criteria CLO/PLO Novice Adv. Beginner Apprentice Proficient Distinguished

Marks: 2- Novice 4-Adv. Beginner 6-Apprentice 8-Proficient 10-Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Marks: 2- Novice 4-Adv. Beginner 6-Apprentice 8-Proficient 10-Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Marks: 2- Novice 4-Adv. Beginner 6-Apprentice 8-Proficient 10-Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Criteria CLO/PLO Novice Adv. Beginner Apprentice Proficient Distinguished

Marks: 2- Novice 4-Adv. Beginner 6-Apprentice 8-Proficient 10-Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Marks: 2- Novice 4-Adv. Beginner 6-Apprentice 8-Proficient 10-Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Marks: 2- Novice 4-Adv. Beginner 6-Apprentice 8-Proficient 10-Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Criteria CLO/PLO Novice Adv. Beginner Apprentice Proficient Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Criteria CLO/PLO Novice Adv. Beginner Apprentice Proficient Distinguished

Marks: 2- Novice 4-Adv. Beginner 6-Apprentice 8-Proficient 10-Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Marks: 2- Novice 4-Adv. Beginner 6-Apprentice 8-Proficient 10-Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Marks: 2- Novice 4-Adv. Beginner 6-Apprentice 8-Proficient 10-Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Criteria CLO/PLO Novice Adv. Beginner Apprentice Proficient Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Criteria CLO/PLO Novice Adv. Beginner Apprentice Proficient Distinguished

Evaluator Name: _______________________________

Criteria CLO/PLO Novice Adv. Beginner Apprentice Proficient Distinguished

Synopsis Title Defense 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Synopsis Title Defense 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

Synopsis Title Defense 5 ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘

You might also like