日本建築学会構造系論文集 第84巻 第759号， 659-667，2019年5月

【カテゴリーⅡ】 J. Struct. Constr. Eng., AIJ, Vol. 84 No. 759, 659-667, May, 2019

DOI http://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.84.659

H
H ᙧ㗰࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࡿ▴ᙧᖹ㠃⌫ᙧ୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࢩ࢙ࣝࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅ≉ᛶ
ᙧ㗰࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࡿ▴ᙧᖹ㠃⌫ᙧ୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࢩ࢙ࣝࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅ≉ᛶ
H ᙧ㗰࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࡿ▴ᙧᖹ㠃⌫ᙧ୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࢩ࢙ࣝࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅ≉ᛶ
H 形鋼で構成される矩形平面球形三角形格子シェルの弾性座屈特性
ELASTICBUCKLING
ELASTIC BUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF
OF SPHERICAL
SPHERICALTRIANGULAR GRID SHELLS
ELASTIC BUCKLINGBEHAVIOR
BEHAVIOR OF SPHERICAL TRIANGULAR
TRIANGULAR GRID
GRID SHELLS
SHELLS
ELASTICCOMPOSED
BUCKLING
COMPOSED OF
OF H-SHAPED
BEHAVIOR
H-SHAPED STEEL
OFSTEEL ON RECTANGULAR
SPHERICAL
ON TRIANGULAR PLAN
RECTANGULAR GRID
PLANSHELLS
COMPOSED OF H-SHAPED STEEL ON RECTANGULAR PLAN
COMPOSED OF H-SHAPED STEEL ON RECTANGULAR PLAN
蔭 山   快＊1，山 下 哲 郎＊2
Kai KAGEYAMA㸨and Tetsuo YAMASHITA
ⶱᒣ ᛌ㸨11㸪ᒣୗ ဴ㑻㸨22 㸨
ⶱᒣ ᛌ㸨1㸪ᒣୗ ဴ㑻㸨2
Kai KAGEYAMA
ⶱᒣ ᛌ and Tetsuoဴ㑻
㸪ᒣୗ YAMASHITA
Kai KAGEYAMA and Tetsuo YAMASHITA
Kai KAGEYAMA and Tetsuo YAMASHITA
In this paper, elastic buckling behavior of latticed shells made of H-shaped steel is investigated, focusing the buckling type. H-shaped steel has
In this paper, elastic buckling behavior of latticed shells made of H-shaped steel is investigated, focusing the buckling type. H-shaped steel has
strong
In thisand weak
paper, axes,buckling
elastic in-planebehavior
memberof buckling
latticedaround the weak
shells made axis appears
of H-shaped steelinisthe first linear buckling
investigated, mode.
focusing the However,
buckling out-of-plane
type. H-shaped shell-like
steel has
strong and weak axes, in-plane member buckling around the weak axis appears in the first linear buckling mode. However, out-of-plane shell-like
buckling
strong andoften
weakoccurs
axes,inin-plane
the geometric
member nonlinear
bucklingbuckling behavior.
around the Focusing
weak axis on in
appears thetheshell-like buckling
first linear mode
buckling thatHowever,
mode. appears in the higher shell-like
out-of-plane order, an
buckling often occurs in the geometric nonlinear buckling behavior. Focusing on the shell-like buckling mode that appears in the higher order, an
index to estimate
buckling the buckling
often occurs type is found.
in the geometric Using
nonlinear the above
buckling resultsFocusing
behavior. and effective
on thebuckling length,
shell-like one can
buckling estimate
mode the buckling
that appears type and
in the higher loadan
order, in
index to estimate the buckling type is found. Using the above results and effective buckling length, one can estimate the buckling type and load in
the elastic
index nonlinear
to estimate thebuckling
bucklingbehavior.
type is found. Using the above results and effective buckling length, one can estimate the buckling type and load in
the elastic nonlinear buckling behavior.
the elastic nonlinear buckling behavior.
Keywords : Triangle grid shell, Buckling, H-shaped steel, Shell-likes Factor, Knockdown factor
Keywords : Triangle grid shell, Buckling, H-shaped steel, Shell-likes Factor, Knockdown factor
Keywords : Triangle grid shell, Buckling,
୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࢩ࢙ࣝ㸪ᗙᒅ㸪H H-shaped steel, Shell-likes Factor, Knockdown factor
ᙧ㗰㸪ࢩ࢙ࣝࡽࡋࡉಀᩘ㸪ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘ
୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࢩ࢙ࣝ㸪ᗙᒅ㸪H ᙧ㗰㸪ࢩ࢙ࣝࡽࡋࡉಀᩘ㸪ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘ
୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࢩ࢙ࣝ㸪ᗙᒅ㸪H ᙧ㗰㸪ࢩ࢙ࣝࡽࡋࡉಀᩘ㸪ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘ
1. ࡣࡌࡵ࡟ ࡿࡢࡣ㸪1)㐺ษ࡞ึᮇ୙ᩚࢆ୚࠼㸪2)㔮ྜ⤒㊰ࢆồࡵ࡚ᗙᒅⅬࢆุ
1. ࡣࡌࡵ࡟ ࡿࡢࡣ㸪1)㐺ษ࡞ึᮇ୙ᩚࢆ୚࠼㸪2)㔮ྜ⤒㊰ࢆồࡵ࡚ᗙᒅⅬࢆุ
1.
 ኱✵㛫ࢆそ࠺ᒇ᰿ᵓ㐀࡜ࡋ࡚༢ᒙ᱁Ꮚࢩ࢙ࣝᵓ㐀ࢆ⏝࠸ࡿ㝿ࡣ㸪
ࡣࡌࡵ࡟ ᐃࡋ㸪࠿ࡘᗙᒅⅬ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࢆồࡵࡿ㸪ᚲせࡀ࠶ࡾ࠿࡞ࡾ
ࡿࡢࡣ㸪1)㐺ษ࡞ึᮇ୙ᩚࢆ୚࠼㸪2)㔮ྜ⤒㊰ࢆồࡵ࡚ᗙᒅⅬࢆุ
 ኱✵㛫ࢆそ࠺ᒇ᰿ᵓ㐀࡜ࡋ࡚༢ᒙ᱁Ꮚࢩ࢙ࣝᵓ㐀ࢆ⏝࠸ࡿ㝿ࡣ㸪 ᐃࡋ㸪࠿ࡘᗙᒅⅬ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࢆồࡵࡿ㸪ᚲせࡀ࠶ࡾ࠿࡞ࡾ
㖄┤Ⲵ㔜࡟ࡼࡿᗙᒅ࡟ᑐࡍࡿタィࡀ᭱ࡶ㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ᚑ᮶༢ᒙ᱁Ꮚ
኱✵㛫ࢆそ࠺ᒇ᰿ᵓ㐀࡜ࡋ࡚༢ᒙ᱁Ꮚࢩ࢙ࣝᵓ㐀ࢆ⏝࠸ࡿ㝿ࡣ㸪 ࡢᗙᒅゎᯒ࡬ࡢ⩦⇍ࢆᚲせ࡜ࡍࡿ㸬⥺ᙧゎᯒ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ
ᐃࡋ㸪࠿ࡘᗙᒅⅬ࡟࠾ࡅࡿᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࢆồࡵࡿ㸪ᚲせࡀ࠶ࡾ࠿࡞ࡾ
㖄┤Ⲵ㔜࡟ࡼࡿᗙᒅ࡟ᑐࡍࡿタィࡀ᭱ࡶ㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ᚑ᮶༢ᒙ᱁Ꮚ ࡢᗙᒅゎᯒ࡬ࡢ⩦⇍ࢆᚲせ࡜ࡍࡿ㸬⥺ᙧゎᯒ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ
ࢩ࢙ࣝࡢᗙᒅ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣከࡃࡢ◊✲ࡀ࡞ࡉࢀ㸪タィᡭἲࡀయ⣔໬ࡉ
㖄┤Ⲵ㔜࡟ࡼࡿᗙᒅ࡟ᑐࡍࡿタィࡀ᭱ࡶ㔜せ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ᚑ᮶༢ᒙ᱁Ꮚ ࡛⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࡢ✀㢮࡜ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆᴫ⟬ࡍࡿ᪉ἲࡀ࠶ࢀࡤ㸪ᑡ࡞ࡃ࡜
ࡢᗙᒅゎᯒ࡬ࡢ⩦⇍ࢆᚲせ࡜ࡍࡿ㸬⥺ᙧゎᯒ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ
ࢩ࢙ࣝࡢᗙᒅ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣከࡃࡢ◊✲ࡀ࡞ࡉࢀ㸪タィᡭἲࡀయ⣔໬ࡉ ࡛⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࡢ✀㢮࡜ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆᴫ⟬ࡍࡿ᪉ἲࡀ࠶ࢀࡤ㸪ᑡ࡞ࡃ࡜
ࢀ࡚ࡁࡓ 1)2)3)㸬
ࢩ࢙ࣝࡢᗙᒅ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣከࡃࡢ◊✲ࡀ࡞ࡉࢀ㸪タィᡭἲࡀయ⣔໬ࡉ ࡶᵓ㐀ィ⏬ẁ㝵࡛ࡣ᭷⏝࡛࠶ࡿ㸬
࡛⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࡢ✀㢮࡜ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆᴫ⟬ࡍࡿ᪉ἲࡀ࠶ࢀࡤ㸪ᑡ࡞ࡃ࡜
ࢀ࡚ࡁࡓ 1)2)3)㸬 ࡶᵓ㐀ィ⏬ẁ㝵࡛ࡣ᭷⏝࡛࠶ࡿ㸬
1)2)3)㸬
ࡑࡢᇶ┙࡜࡞ࡗࡓ᪤ ࡢ◊✲ࡣ㗰⟶㒊ᮦࢆ௬ᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡶࡢࡀ኱
ࢀ࡚ࡁࡓ ᳜ᮌ➼ 6)ࡣ⌫ᙧࢩ࢙ࣝࡢྂ඾ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆ 1 ⠇Ⅼࡢ⠇ⅬᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡛
ࡶᵓ㐀ィ⏬ẁ㝵࡛ࡣ᭷⏝࡛࠶ࡿ㸬
ࡑࡢᇶ┙࡜࡞ࡗࡓ᪤ ࡢ◊✲ࡣ㗰⟶㒊ᮦࢆ௬ᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡶࡢࡀ኱ ᳜ᮌ➼ 6)ࡣ⌫ᙧࢩ࢙ࣝࡢྂ඾ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆ 1 ⠇Ⅼࡢ⠇ⅬᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡛
༙࡛࠶ࡿࡀ㸪≉࡟୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࡢሙྜ㸪㗰⟶࡛ࡣᗙᒅࡢ㜵Ṇ࡟୙ྍḞ
ࡑࡢᇶ┙࡜࡞ࡗࡓ᪤ ࡢ◊✲ࡣ㗰⟶㒊ᮦࢆ௬ᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡶࡢࡀ኱ ↓ḟඖ໬ࡋ࡚ᚓࡿ 1 ⠇Ⅼࡢ⠇ⅬᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡛
ξ-η ᗙᶆ࡛㸪๛᥋ྜ୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࣛࢳࢫࢻ࣮࣒ࡢᗙ
᳜ᮌ➼ 6)ࡣ⌫ᙧࢩ࢙ࣝࡢྂ඾ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆ
༙࡛࠶ࡿࡀ㸪≉࡟୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࡢሙྜ㸪㗰⟶࡛ࡣᗙᒅࡢ㜵Ṇ࡟୙ྍḞ ↓ḟඖ໬ࡋ࡚ᚓࡿ ξ-η ᗙᶆ࡛㸪๛᥋ྜ୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࣛࢳࢫࢻ࣮࣒ࡢᗙ
࡞༑ศ࡞᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ᥋ྜ㒊ࡢᐇ⌧ࡀ㞴ࡋ࠸㸬୍᪉㸪๛᥋ྜࡀ
༙࡛࠶ࡿࡀ㸪≉࡟୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࡢሙྜ㸪㗰⟶࡛ࡣᗙᒅࡢ㜵Ṇ࡟୙ྍḞ ᒅ≉ᛶࢆᩚ⌮ࡋࡓ㸬ࡑࡢᚋຍ⸨➼ࡣ
↓ḟඖ໬ࡋ࡚ᚓࡿ ξ ࡢ್࡟ࡼࡾ㸪඲యᗙᒅ࡜ಶᮦ
ξ-η ᗙᶆ࡛㸪๛᥋ྜ୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࣛࢳࢫࢻ࣮࣒ࡢᗙ
࡞༑ศ࡞᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ᥋ྜ㒊ࡢᐇ⌧ࡀ㞴ࡋ࠸㸬୍᪉㸪๛᥋ྜࡀ ᒅ≉ᛶࢆᩚ⌮ࡋࡓ㸬ࡑࡢᚋຍ⸨➼ࡣ ξ ࡢ್࡟ࡼࡾ㸪඲యᗙᒅ࡜ಶᮦ
㗰⟶࡟ẚ࡭࡚ẚ㍑ⓗᴦ࡟ᐇ⌧࡛ࡁࡿ H ᆺ㗰ࡸᙉ㍈࡜ᙅ㍈ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ
࡞༑ศ࡞᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ᥋ྜ㒊ࡢᐇ⌧ࡀ㞴ࡋ࠸㸬୍᪉㸪๛᥋ྜࡀ ᒅ≉ᛶࢆᩚ⌮ࡋࡓ㸬ࡑࡢᚋຍ⸨➼ࡣ ξ7)ࡢ್࡟ࡼࡾ㸪඲యᗙᒅ࡜ಶᮦ
ᗙᒅࡀุᐃྍ⬟࡞ࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ 㸬ᒣ⏣➼ࡶ⌫ᙧࣛࢳࢫࢻ࣮࣒
㗰⟶࡟ẚ࡭࡚ẚ㍑ⓗᴦ࡟ᐇ⌧࡛ࡁࡿ H ᆺ㗰ࡸᙉ㍈࡜ᙅ㍈ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ ᗙᒅࡀุᐃྍ⬟࡞ࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ 7)㸬ᒣ⏣➼ࡶ⌫ᙧࣛࢳࢫࢻ࣮࣒
㗰⟶࡟ẚ࡭࡚ẚ㍑ⓗᴦ࡟ᐇ⌧࡛ࡁࡿ H ᆺ㗰ࡸᙉ㍈࡜ᙅ㍈ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ
㒊ᮦ᩿㠃ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡶᐇ㝿࡟ᩘከࡃᘓタࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅᙧᘧࢆศ㢮ࡍࡿᣦᶆࢆᥦ᱌ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ
ᗙᒅࡀุᐃྍ⬟࡞ࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ 8)㸬ࡋ࠿
7)㸬ᒣ⏣➼ࡶ⌫ᙧࣛࢳࢫࢻ࣮࣒
㒊ᮦ᩿㠃ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡶᐇ㝿࡟ᩘከࡃᘓタࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅᙧᘧࢆศ㢮ࡍࡿᣦᶆࢆᥦ᱌ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ 8)㸬ࡋ࠿
4)5)㸬H ᆺ㗰ࡣᙉ㍈ࡲࢃࡾࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡀ኱ࡁࡃ㸪᫂ࡽ࠿࡟඲యᗙᒅ࡟
㒊ᮦ᩿㠃ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡶᐇ㝿࡟ᩘከࡃᘓタࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ ࡋ࡞ࡀࡽ௨ୖࡢ◊✲ࡣ㗰⟶㒊ᮦࢆ௬ᐃࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᙉᙅ㍈ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ㒊
࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅᙧᘧࢆศ㢮ࡍࡿᣦᶆࢆᥦ᱌ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ 8)㸬ࡋ࠿
4)5)㸬H ᆺ㗰ࡣᙉ㍈ࡲࢃࡾࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡀ኱ࡁࡃ㸪᫂ࡽ࠿࡟඲యᗙᒅ࡟ ࡋ࡞ࡀࡽ௨ୖࡢ◊✲ࡣ㗰⟶㒊ᮦࢆ௬ᐃࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᙉᙅ㍈ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ㒊
4)5)㸬H ᆺ㗰ࡣᙉ㍈ࡲࢃࡾࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡀ኱ࡁࡃ㸪᫂ࡽ࠿࡟඲యᗙᒅ࡟
ᑐࡋ࡚㗰⟶ࡼࡾ᭷฼࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡑࡢ୍᪉࡛㒊ᮦࡢᙅ㍈ࡲࢃࡾࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ ᮦ࡛࡛ࡁࡓࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝ࡟ࡣ┤᥋㐺⏝࡛ࡁ࡞࠸㸬
ࡋ࡞ࡀࡽ௨ୖࡢ◊✲ࡣ㗰⟶㒊ᮦࢆ௬ᐃࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᙉᙅ㍈ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ㒊
ᑐࡋ࡚㗰⟶ࡼࡾ᭷฼࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡑࡢ୍᪉࡛㒊ᮦࡢᙅ㍈ࡲࢃࡾࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ ᮦ࡛࡛ࡁࡓࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝ࡟ࡣ┤᥋㐺⏝࡛ࡁ࡞࠸㸬
ᛶࡣᙉ㍈ࡢᩘศࡢ 1 ௨ୗ࡛࠶ࡿࡓࡵ㸪㗰⟶࡛࡛ࡁࡓࢩ࢙ࣝࡼࡾ㠃ෆ
ᑐࡋ࡚㗰⟶ࡼࡾ᭷฼࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡑࡢ୍᪉࡛㒊ᮦࡢᙅ㍈ࡲࢃࡾࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ ࡲࡓ㸪᪤ ࡢࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢ◊✲࡛ࡣ㸪ᗙᒅ๓ࡢ⌮᝿ⓗ࡞⭷ᛂຊ
ᮦ࡛࡛ࡁࡓࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝ࡟ࡣ┤᥋㐺⏝࡛ࡁ࡞࠸㸬
ᛶࡣᙉ㍈ࡢᩘศࡢ 1 ௨ୗ࡛࠶ࡿࡓࡵ㸪㗰⟶࡛࡛ࡁࡓࢩ࢙ࣝࡼࡾ㠃ෆ ࡲࡓ㸪᪤ ࡢࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢ◊✲࡛ࡣ㸪ᗙᒅ๓ࡢ⌮᝿ⓗ࡞⭷ᛂຊ
ᛶࡣᙉ㍈ࡢᩘศࡢ 1 ௨ୗ࡛࠶ࡿࡓࡵ㸪㗰⟶࡛࡛ࡁࡓࢩ࢙ࣝࡼࡾ㠃ෆ
ࡢಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡸࡍࡃ࡞ࡿࡇ࡜ࡣᐜ᫆࡟ண᝿ࡉࢀࡿ㸬 ≧ែࢆᐇ⌧ࡍࡿࡓࡵ࿘㎶ࢆࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡜ࡍࡿ࠿㸪࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣࢸࣥࢩࣙࣥ
ࡲࡓ㸪᪤ ࡢࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢ◊✲࡛ࡣ㸪ᗙᒅ๓ࡢ⌮᝿ⓗ࡞⭷ᛂຊ
ࡢಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡸࡍࡃ࡞ࡿࡇ࡜ࡣᐜ᫆࡟ண᝿ࡉࢀࡿ㸬 ≧ែࢆᐇ⌧ࡍࡿࡓࡵ࿘㎶ࢆࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡜ࡍࡿ࠿㸪࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣࢸࣥࢩࣙࣥ
ᗙᒅ๓ᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࡢᙳ㡪ࡀᚤᑠ࡞㦵⤌ᵓ㐀࡛ࡣ㸪⥺ᙧᗙᒅ
ࡢಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡸࡍࡃ࡞ࡿࡇ࡜ࡣᐜ᫆࡟ண᝿ࡉࢀࡿ㸬 ࣜࣥࢢࡢ࡜ࢀࡿ෇ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢᵓ㐀ࣔࢹࣝࡀከ࠸ࡀ㸪ᐇ㝿࡟ᘓタࡉࢀࡿ
≧ែࢆᐇ⌧ࡍࡿࡓࡵ࿘㎶ࢆࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡜ࡍࡿ࠿㸪࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣࢸࣥࢩࣙࣥ
ᗙᒅ๓ᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࡢᙳ㡪ࡀᚤᑠ࡞㦵⤌ᵓ㐀࡛ࡣ㸪⥺ᙧᗙᒅ ࣜࣥࢢࡢ࡜ࢀࡿ෇ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢᵓ㐀ࣔࢹࣝࡀከ࠸ࡀ㸪ᐇ㝿࡟ᘓタࡉࢀࡿ
ゎᯒ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ 1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡛ᗙᒅࡍࡿ࡜⪃࠼࡚Ⰻ࠸ࡀ㸪ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝ
ᗙᒅ๓ᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࡢᙳ㡪ࡀᚤᑠ࡞㦵⤌ᵓ㐀࡛ࡣ㸪⥺ᙧᗙᒅ ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢከࡃࡣ▴ᙧᖹ㠃ࢆ᭷ࡋ㸪࠿ࡘᰕࡢୖ࡟ᒇ᰿ࢆ㍕ࡏࡿ
ࣜࣥࢢࡢ࡜ࢀࡿ෇ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢᵓ㐀ࣔࢹࣝࡀከ࠸ࡀ㸪ᐇ㝿࡟ᘓタࡉࢀࡿ
ゎᯒ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ 1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡛ᗙᒅࡍࡿ࡜⪃࠼࡚Ⰻ࠸ࡀ㸪ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝ ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢከࡃࡣ▴ᙧᖹ㠃ࢆ᭷ࡋ㸪࠿ࡘᰕࡢୖ࡟ᒇ᰿ࢆ㍕ࡏࡿ
ゎᯒ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ 1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡛ᗙᒅࡍࡿ࡜⪃࠼࡚Ⰻ࠸ࡀ㸪ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝ
ࡀ඲యᗙᒅࢆ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜ࡟ࡣᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓᙎᛶᗙᒅ ࡓࡵᒇ᰿ࡣ࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡜ぢ࡞ࡏࡿሙྜࡀከ࠸㸬
ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢከࡃࡣ▴ᙧᖹ㠃ࢆ᭷ࡋ㸪࠿ࡘᰕࡢୖ࡟ᒇ᰿ࢆ㍕ࡏࡿ
ࡀ඲యᗙᒅࢆ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜ࡟ࡣᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓᙎᛶᗙᒅ ࡓࡵᒇ᰿ࡣ࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡜ぢ࡞ࡏࡿሙྜࡀከ࠸㸬
Ⲵ㔜ࡀ⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢ༙ศ⛬ᗘ࡟࡞ࡿࡇ࡜ࡶ࠶ࡿ
ࡀ඲యᗙᒅࢆ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜ࡟ࡣᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓᙎᛶᗙᒅ 2)㸬ࡇࡢሙྜ 1 ḟ ࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞⫼ᬒࡼࡾᮏ◊✲ࡣ㸪⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ࡛ 1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡟ಶᮦ
ࡓࡵᒇ᰿ࡣ࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡜ぢ࡞ࡏࡿሙྜࡀከ࠸㸬
Ⲵ㔜ࡀ⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢ༙ศ⛬ᗘ࡟࡞ࡿࡇ࡜ࡶ࠶ࡿ 2)㸬ࡇࡢሙྜ 1 ḟ ࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞⫼ᬒࡼࡾᮏ◊✲ࡣ㸪⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ࡛ 1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡟ಶᮦ
࣮ࣔࢻ࡟ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀฟ⌧ࡋ࡚ࡶ㸪ᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࡢᙳ㡪࡛඲యᗙ
Ⲵ㔜ࡀ⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢ༙ศ⛬ᗘ࡟࡞ࡿࡇ࡜ࡶ࠶ࡿ 2)㸬ࡇࡢሙྜ 1 ḟ ᗙᒅࡀ⌧ࢀࡿ▴ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ H ᆺ㗰࡛࡛ࡁࡓ༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝ࡟ࡘ࠸
ࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞⫼ᬒࡼࡾᮏ◊✲ࡣ㸪⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ࡛ 1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡟ಶᮦ
࣮ࣔࢻ࡟ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀฟ⌧ࡋ࡚ࡶ㸪ᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࡢᙳ㡪࡛඲యᗙ ᗙᒅࡀ⌧ࢀࡿ▴ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ H ᆺ㗰࡛࡛ࡁࡓ༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝ࡟ࡘ࠸
ᒅࡀඛ⾜ࡋ࡚⏕ࡌࡿࡇ࡜ࡶண᝿ࡉࢀࡿࡓࡵ㸪Ꮫ఍ᣦ㔪
࣮ࣔࢻ࡟ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀฟ⌧ࡋ࡚ࡶ㸪ᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࡢᙳ㡪࡛඲యᗙ 2)࡛ࡣ⥺ᙧᗙ ᗙᒅࡀ⌧ࢀࡿ▴ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢ H ᆺ㗰࡛࡛ࡁࡓ༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝ࡟ࡘ࠸
࡚㸪㧗ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡟⌧ࢀࡿ඲యᗙᒅ࡟ࡶὀ┠ࡋ㸪1)඲యᗙᒅ࡜ಶᮦᗙ
ᒅࡀඛ⾜ࡋ࡚⏕ࡌࡿࡇ࡜ࡶண᝿ࡉࢀࡿࡓࡵ㸪Ꮫ఍ᣦ㔪 2)࡛ࡣ⥺ᙧᗙ ࡚㸪㧗ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡟⌧ࢀࡿ඲యᗙᒅ࡟ࡶὀ┠ࡋ㸪1)඲యᗙᒅ࡜ಶᮦᗙ
ᒅゎᯒ࡛ 1 ḟ࡟ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜ࡟ࡣᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࢆ⪃៖
ᒅࡀඛ⾜ࡋ࡚⏕ࡌࡿࡇ࡜ࡶண᝿ࡉࢀࡿࡓࡵ㸪Ꮫ఍ᣦ㔪 2)࡛ࡣ⥺ᙧᗙ ᒅࡢⓎ⏕᮲௳ࢆᩚ⌮ࡋ㸪⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ㸪࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ⥺ᙧゎᯒࡢࡳ࡛⏕
࡚㸪㧗ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡟⌧ࢀࡿ඲యᗙᒅ࡟ࡶὀ┠ࡋ㸪1)඲యᗙᒅ࡜ಶᮦᗙ
ᒅゎᯒ࡛ 1 ḟ࡟ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜ࡟ࡣᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࢆ⪃៖ ᒅࡢⓎ⏕᮲௳ࢆᩚ⌮ࡋ㸪⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ㸪࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ⥺ᙧゎᯒࡢࡳ࡛⏕
ᒅゎᯒ࡛ 1 ḟ࡟ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜ࡟ࡣᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࢆ⪃៖
ࡋࡓᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒࢆᐇ᪋ࡋ࡚⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ᥎ዡࡋ࡚ ࡌࡿᗙᒅࢆண᝿࡛ࡁࡿᣦᶆࢆ♧ࡍ㸬2)ಶᮦᗙᒅࡢᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࢆ♧ࡋ㸪
ᒅࡢⓎ⏕᮲௳ࢆᩚ⌮ࡋ㸪⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ㸪࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ⥺ᙧゎᯒࡢࡳ࡛⏕
ࡋࡓᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒࢆᐇ᪋ࡋ࡚⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ᥎ዡࡋ࡚ ࡌࡿᗙᒅࢆண᝿࡛ࡁࡿᣦᶆࢆ♧ࡍ㸬2)ಶᮦᗙᒅࡢᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࢆ♧ࡋ㸪
࠸ࡿ㸬ࡋ࠿ࡋ࡞ࡀࡽ㸪ᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒ࡛ᗙᒅⅬ࡜ᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࢆ≉ᐃࡍ
ࡋࡓᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒࢆᐇ᪋ࡋ࡚⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ᥎ዡࡋ࡚ ⥺ᙧゎᯒ࡛ᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢ᥎ᐃࢆྍ⬟࡟ࡍࡿ㸬ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢቃ⏺
ࡌࡿᗙᒅࢆண᝿࡛ࡁࡿᣦᶆࢆ♧ࡍ㸬2)ಶᮦᗙᒅࡢᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࢆ♧ࡋ㸪
࠸ࡿ㸬ࡋ࠿ࡋ࡞ࡀࡽ㸪ᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒ࡛ᗙᒅⅬ࡜ᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࢆ≉ᐃࡍ ⥺ᙧゎᯒ࡛ᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢ᥎ᐃࢆྍ⬟࡟ࡍࡿ㸬ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢቃ⏺
࠸ࡿ㸬ࡋ࠿ࡋ࡞ࡀࡽ㸪ᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒ࡛ᗙᒅⅬ࡜ᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࢆ≉ᐃࡍ ⥺ᙧゎᯒ࡛ᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢ᥎ᐃࢆྍ⬟࡟ࡍࡿ㸬ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢቃ⏺
㸨1 㔠⟽ᵓ㐀タィ஦ົᡤ ಟኈ㸦ᕤᏛ㸧 Kanebako Structural Eng., M.Eng. (Former Grad. Student,
㸨1㸦ඖ
 㔠⟽ᵓ㐀タィ஦ົᡤ ಟኈ㸦ᕤᏛ㸧
ᕤᏛ㝔኱Ꮫ኱Ꮫ㝔ᘓ⠏Ꮫᑓᨷ ኱Ꮫ㝔⏕㸧 Kanebako Structural
Architecture program Eng., M.Eng. School,
in Graduate (FormerKogakuin
Grad. Student,
University.)
＊1
㸨1 　
㸦ඖ 金箱構造設計事務所 修士
㔠⟽ᵓ㐀タィ஦ົᡤ （工学）኱Ꮫ㝔⏕㸧
ಟኈ㸦ᕤᏛ㸧
ᕤᏛ㝔኱Ꮫ኱Ꮫ㝔ᘓ⠏Ꮫᑓᨷ KanebakoKanebako Structural
Structural
Architecture Eng.,
Eng., M.Eng.
program M.Eng. School,
in Graduate (FormerKogakuin
Grad. Student,
University.)
㸨2㸦ඖ
 （元 工学院大学大学院建築学専攻 大学院生）
ᕤᏛ㝔኱Ꮫᘓ⠏Ꮫᑓᨷ ᩍᤵ࣭༤ኈ㸦ᕤᏛ㸧
ᕤᏛ㝔኱Ꮫ኱Ꮫ㝔ᘓ⠏Ꮫᑓᨷ ኱Ꮫ㝔⏕㸧 (Former Prof.,
Grad.School
Architecture of
Student, Architecture,
Architecture
program Kogakuin
program
in Graduate inUniversity,
School,Graduate
Kogakuin Dr. Eng.
School, Kogakuin University)
University.)
㸨2
＊2 ᕤᏛ㝔኱Ꮫᘓ⠏Ꮫᑓᨷ ᩍᤵ࣭༤ኈ㸦ᕤᏛ㸧
　工学院大学建築学専攻 教授・博士（工学） Prof., School of Architecture, Kogakuin University,
Prof., School of Architecture, Kogakuin University, Dr.Eng. Dr. Eng.
㸨2 ᕤᏛ㝔኱Ꮫᘓ⠏Ꮫᑓᨷ ᩍᤵ࣭༤ኈ㸦ᕤᏛ㸧 Prof., School of Architecture, Kogakuin University, Dr. Eng.

─ 659 ─
᮲௳ࡣࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡜࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡜ࡍࡿ㸬㒊ᮦࡢᶓᗙᒅࡸᒁ㒊ᗙᒅࡣ ࡶከ࠸Ⅽ㸪௒ᅇࡣ Fig.2 ࡢࡼ࠺࡟ x㸪y ࡢ 2 ᪉ྥ⛣ືྍ⬟࡞࣮࣮ࣟࣛ
↓どࡍࡿ㸬 ᨭᣢ࡜ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬
2.3 㒊ᮦ᩿㠃࡜Ỵᐃ᪉ἲ
2. ゎᯒࣔࢹࣝ  㒊ᮦ᩿㠃ࡣ඲㒊ᮦྠ୍ࡢ H ᙧ㗰࡜ࡋ㸪࿘㎶ᱱࢆྵࡵࡓ඲࡚ࡢ H
2.1 ࢩ࢙ࣝᙧ≧ ᙧ㗰㒊ᮦࡢ࢙࢘ࣈ㠃ࡣࢩ࢙ࣝࡢ᭤⋡୰ᚰ O ࢆྥࡃࡼ࠺࡟ᐃࡵࡿ
 ᮏ◊✲ࡣ Fig.1 ࡢࡼ࠺࡞᭤⋡༙ᚄ R ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ⌫ᙧ୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࢩ࢙ (Fig.3)㸬ᙉ㍈ࡲࢃࡾࡢ᩿㠃஧ḟ࣮࣓ࣔࣥࢺ Ix ࡣ 2000cm4㸪㒊ᮦ᩿㠃
ࣝࢆゎᯒᑐ㇟࡜ࡍࡿ㸬ᖹ㠃ࡣ 20m×20m ࡢṇ᪉ᙧ࡜ࡋ㸪୰ኸ㒊෇ᘼ ✚ A ࡣ 25cm2㸪㒊ᮦࣖࣥࢢಀᩘ E ࡣ 205000N/mm2 ୍࡛ᐃ࡜ࡍࡿ㸬
࡟࠾ࡅࡿࣛ࢖ࢬ/ࢫࣃࣥẚࢆ 0.075㸪0.1㸪0.125 ࡢ 3 ࣃࢱ࣮ࣥ᝿ᐃࡍ 㒊ᮦࡢࡡࡌࡾ๛ᛶࡣ⪃៖ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸㸬ᙅ㍈ࡲࢃࡾࡢ᩿㠃஧ḟ࣮࣓ࣔ
ࡿ㸬x ᪉ྥศ๭ࢆ 8 ศ๭࡜ࡋ㸪y ᪉ྥࡢศ๭ࡣ᱁Ꮚᙧ≧ࡀṇ୕ゅᙧ࡟ ࣥ ࢺ Iy ࡣ 1 ḟ ࡟ ಶ ᮦ ᗙ ᒅ ࡀ Ⓨ ⏕ ࡋ 㸪 ୟ ࡘ ⥺ ᙧ ᗙ ᒅ Ⲵ 㔜 ẚ ⋡
㏆࡙ࡃࡼ࠺࡟ 7 ศ๭࡜ࡋࡓ㸬l0 ࡣᖹᆒ㒊ᮦ㛗ࡉ㸪θ0 ࡣ㒊ᮦ༙㛤ゅ࡛ lin
qcr all qcrm ࡀ 1.5㸪2.0㸪2.5 ಸ(ࣆࣥᨭᣢࡢࡳ 1.1㸪1.25 ಸ)࡜࡞ࡿ
lin

m ࡣ 1 ḟ࣮ࣔ
lin
࠶ࡾ R ࡜ l0 ࢆ⏝࠸࡚ᘧ(1)࡛㏆ఝⓗ࡟⾲ࢃࡍࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿ㸬 ࡼ࠺࡟ᚋ㏙ࡍࡿ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒࡼࡾᐃࡵࡿ㸬ࡇࡇ࡛ qcr
l0 lin
ࢻࡢᗙᒅⲴ㔜(⥺ᙧಶᮦᗙᒅⲴ㔜)㸪 qcr all ࡣ㧗ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡟⌧ࢀࡿ᭱ึ
T0 (1)
2R ࡢ඲యᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࡢᗙᒅⲴ㔜(⥺ᙧ඲యᗙᒅⲴ㔜)࡛࠶ࡿ㸬Table 1 ࡟
2.2 Ⲵ㔜ཬࡧቃ⏺᮲௳ ᮏ◊✲࡛⏝࠸ࡿ H ᙧ㗰ࡢ᩿㠃࡜᩿㠃ᛶ⬟ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬H㸪B㸪tw㸪tf ࡣࡑ
 Ⲵ㔜ࡢ㈇ᢸ㠃✚ࡣ࡯ࡰ➼ࡋ࠸࡜௬ᐃࡋ㸪ྛ⠇Ⅼ࡟ᆒ୍ࡢ⠇ⅬⲴ㔜 ࢀࡒࢀ㸪ᱱࡏ࠸㸪ᱱᖜ㸪࢙࢘ࣈཌ㸪ࣇࣛࣥࢪཌ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ᖜཌẚࡣ FC
P0 ࢆ㖄┤ୗྥࡁ࡟୚࠼ࡿ㸬1 ⠇Ⅼᙜࡓࡾࡢ㈇ᢸ㠃✚ S ࡣᖹᆒ㒊ᮦ㛗 ࣛࣥࢡ௨ୗࡔࡀ㸪ᮏ◊✲࡛ࡣᒁ㒊ᗙᒅ࡜ᶓᗙᒅࡣ↓どࡍࡿ㸬㠀⌧ᐇ
2
ࡉࢆ⏝࠸࡚ S 3l0 2 ࡜ࡍࡿ㸬୍⯡࡟༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙࡛ࣝࡣᨭᣢ ⓗ࡞᩿㠃ࡔࡀ㸪ᮏ◊✲ࡢ୺ࡓࡿ┠ⓗࡣ඲యᗙᒅ࡜ಶᮦᗙᒅࡢⓎ⏕᮲
᮲௳࡟ࡼࡾᛂຊ≧ែࡀ␗࡞ࡾ㸪ᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡟኱ࡁࡃᙳ㡪ࡍࡿ㸬ࡇࡇ࡛ ௳ࢆᩚ⌮ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡟࠶ࡾ㸪୺࡟ᙳ㡪ࡍࡿࡢࡣ Ix ࡜ Iy ࡢẚ⋡(Ix /Iy)࡛㸪
ࡣ Fig.2 ࡟♧ࡍࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡜࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࡢ 2 ✀㢮࡜ࡍࡿ㸬ᐇ㝿࡟ࣛ ᐇ㝿࡟〇㐀ࡉࢀࡿ H ᆺ㗰ࡢ Ix /Iy ࡜ᴫࡡ➼ࡋࡃ࡞ࡿ᩿㠃࡜ࡋࡓ㸬௨
lin lin
ࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࢆᒇ᰿࡟⏝࠸ࡓᘓ≀ࡣ㸪㕲㦵ᰕࡢୖ࡟ᒇ᰿ࢆ㍕ࡏࡿࡇ࡜ ᚋྛࣔࢹࣝࡣࠕRise/Span_Boundary_ qcr all / qcrm ࠖ࡜ࡋ࡚⾲グࡍࡿ㸬

z y  : Pin support  : Pin roller support of x, y direction

y : Pin roller support of x direction
x
Rise/Span=0.075 Rise/Span=0.1 : Pin roller support of y direction
x Fig.2 Boundary condition
Ris
Rise
z
y Span
H-shaped steel

Rise/Span L [mm] l 0 [mm] R [mm] θ 0 [rad]

0.075 2825.0 34083 0.041 z
0.1 2000 2860.7 26000 0.055 O direction
Rise/Span=0.125 0.125 2910.6 x 21250 0.068  : Web face
O
Fig.1 Shape of analysis model Fig.3 x-z cross section
Table 1 Assumed cross section of H-beams and geometric properties
Model Linear Buckling Analysis
Rise/Span Boundary qcrlin all qcrlin m lin 2 lin 2 lin lin
H x B x tw x tf A [cm2] Ix [cm4] Iy [cm4] qcr m[kN / m ] mode qcrall [kN / m ] mode qcr  all qcr  m
1.1 200 x 167.3 x 2.93 x 5.82 25 2000 455 70.6 1 77.1 7 1.09
1.25 200 x 154.7 x 2.85 x 6.36 25 2000 392 61.2 1 76.9 15 1.26
0.075 1.5 200 x 138.9 x 2.72 x 7.18 25 2000 321 50.4 1 76.7 27 1.52
2.0 200 x 118.9 x 2.50 x 8.60 25 2000 241 38.1 1 76.4 37 2.01
2.5 200 x 105.1 x 2.28 x 9.94 25 2000 193 30.6 1 76.1 45 2.49
1.1 200 x 191.7 x 3.05 x 5.01 25 2000 588 116.1 1 126.8 7 1.09
1.25 200 x 178.4 x 2.99 x 5.42 25 2000 513 101.9 1 126.5 17 1.24
0.1 Pin 1.5 200 x 160.0 x 2.89 x 6.12 25 2000 418 83.7 1 125.9 28 1.50
2.0 200 x 137.2 x 2.71 x 7.28 25 2000 313 63.4 1 125.2 37 1.97
2.5 200 x 121.5 x 2.53 x 8.38 25 2000 251 51.0 1 124.6 48 2.44
1.1 200 x 216.4 x 3.14 x 4.39 25 2000 741 170.7 1 187.7 7 1.10
1.25 200 x 201.3 x 3.09 x 4.75 25 2000 645 149.8 1 187 18 1.25
0.125 1.5 200 x 181.0 x 3.00 x 5.33 25 2000 527 123.8 1 186.1 28 1.50
2.0 200 x 155.4 x 2.85 x 6.32 25 2000 396 93.9 1 184.7 37 1.97
2.5 200 x 137.9 x 2.71 x 7.24 25 2000 317 75.6 1 183.6 49 2.43
1.5 200 x 146.5 x 2.79 x 6.76 25 2000 354 42.7 1 64.0 29 1.50
0.075 2.0 200 x 125.4 x 2.58 x 8.07 25 2000 266 32.4 1 63.7 43 1.97
2.5 200 x 111.0 x 2.38 x 9.32 25 2000 212 26.1 1 63.4 61 2.43
1.5 200 x 168.3 x 2.94 x 5.78 25 2000 459 67.2 1 102.3 30 1.52
0.1 Roller 2.0 200 x 144.4 x 2.77 x 6.87 25 2000 345 51.3 1 101.5 45 1.98
2.5 200 x 128.0 x 2.61 x 7.89 25 2000 276 41.5 1 100.9 55 2.43
1.5 200 x 190.4 x 3.05 x 5.05 25 2000 580 92.2 1 140.5 29 1.52
0.125 2.0 200 x 163.5 x 2.91 x 5.97 25 2000 435 70.8 1 138.8 44 1.96
2.5 200 x 145.2 x 2.78 x 6.83 25 2000 348 57.4 1 137.5 53 2.40

─ 660 ─
2.4 ゎᯒ᪉ἲ ഴྥ࡛࠶ࡿⅭ Fig.5 ࡟ࡣ♧ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸㸬ࣉࣟࢵࢺࡢⓑᢤࡁࡣࣆࣥᨭ
 ᩘ್ゎᯒ࡟ࡣỗ⏝᭷㝈せ⣲ἲゎᯒࢯࣇࢺ MSC-MARC20179)ࢆ⏝ ᣢ㸪ሬࡾࡘࡪࡋࡣ࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬ྂ඾ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢ⢭ᗘ
࠸ࡿ㸬ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢ 1 㒊ᮦࡣ 4 ࡘࡢᱱせ⣲࡛ᵓᡂࡍࡿ㸬ᗙᒅ᪉⛬ ࢆ⾲ࡍ γall ࡣࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡛ࡣᴫࡡ 1.1㸪࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡛ࡣ 0.9 ௜㏆࡛࠶
ᘧࡢᅛ᭷್ၥ㢟ࢆゎࡃ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ࡜㸪ᗙᒅ๓ࡢᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶ ࡾ FEM ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ࡜Ⰻዲ࡟୍⮴ࡍࡿ㸬
ࢆ⪃៖ࡋ࡚ Riks -Ramm ࡢᘼ㛗ἲ࡟ࡼࡿᙎᛶ㠀⥺ᙧゎᯒࢆ⾜࠺㸬  ࡲࡓ㸪ࢩ࢙ࣝ⌮ㄽゎࢆࣃ࣓ࣛࢺࣜࢵࢡ࡞ FEM ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡛⿵ṇࡋ
࡚ᚓࡽࢀࡓ⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜 es Pcr
lin
ࢆᘧ(3)࡟♧ࡍ 1)3)㸬ᘧ(3)ࡣ᥋ྜ㒊๛

3. ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ ᥋࡜ࡋࡓሙྜࡢ 1 ⠇Ⅼ࠶ࡓࡾࡢⲴ㔜࡛࠶ࡿ㸬

3.1 ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ § 12 2 ·
es lin es lin¨
Pcr Ccr ¸ E ˜ A ˜ T0av 3
ᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࡢ౛ࢆ Fig.4 ࡟♧ࡍ㸬඲࡚ࡢࣔࢹ࡛ࣝ 1 ḟ࡟ಶᮦᗙᒅ ¨ O ˜ T ¸ (3)
© 0 0 av ¹
ࡀ㸪㧗ḟ࡟඲యᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿ㸬౛࠼ࡤ㸪0.075_Pin_1.5 model ࡛
T0av T x0T y 0 2 , [ 12 2 O0 T0av
3 ࠉࠉ
ࡣ 27 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻࡲ࡛඲యᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡋ࡞࠸㸬㸯ḟᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻ࡛ࡣ㸪
ࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡛ࡣࢩ࢙ࣝ୰ኸ㒊௜㏆ࡀಶᮦᗙᒅࢆ㉳ࡇࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡢ࡟ᑐࡋ㸪 ࡇࡇ࡛ θx0㸪θy0 ࡣ㒊ᮦ༙㛤ゅ࡛࠶ࡾࢩ࢙ࣝ㛤ゅࢆศ๭ᩘ࡛㝖ࡋࡓ㒊
࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡛ࡣ࿘㎶㒊࡛ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬1 ḟࡢಶᮦᗙ ᮦ㛤ゅ࠿ࡽᐃࡵ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬 O0 ࡣᖹᆒ㒊ᮦ㛗ࡉࢆᗙᒅ㛗ࡉ࡜ࡋ㸪Ix ࢆ⏝
lin lin
ᒅⲴ㔜 qcr m 㸪㧗ḟࡢ඲యᗙᒅⲴ㔜 qcrall 㸪࣮ࣔࢻḟᩘ㸪⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ ࠸࡚⟬ฟࡉࢀࡿ㒊ᮦ⣽㛗ẚ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪 esCcr
lin
ࡣᨭᣢ᮲௳࡛␗࡞

all qcrm ࢆ Table 1 ࡟♧ࡍ㸬࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࡢ⥺ᙧ඲యᗙ

lin lin
㔜ẚ⋡ qcr ࡾ㸪ࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡞ࡽࡤᘧ(4-a)㸪༢⣧ᨭᣢ࡞ࡽࡤᘧ(4-b)࡛ᐃࡵࡿ 10)11)12)㸬
ᒅⲴ㔜࡜⥺ᙧಶᮦᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀࣆࣥᨭᣢࡢ⥺ᙧ඲ᗙᒅయⲴ㔜㸪 es lin
Ccr  0.0707 T x0  0.0321 T y0  0.00236[ 2
 1.10 T x0  0.383 T y 0  0.0170[
⥺ᙧ඲యᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡟ẚ࡭ 20%⛬ᗘప࠸㸬
(4-a)
  3.31 T x0  5.46 T y 0  0.982
3.2 ඲యᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜࡢࢩ࢙ࣝ⌮ㄽゎ
 ᪤ ࡢᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧ࡜ẚ㍑ࡋᮏゎᯒࡢ⢭ᗘࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿ㸬ࢩ࢙ࣝ⌮ㄽ
࡟ࡼࡾㄏᑟࡉࢀࡓ➼᪉ᛶࢩ࢙ࣝࡢྂ඾ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ᘧࢆᘧ(2)࡟♧ࡍ 2)㸬 es lin
Ccr  0.0663 T x0  0.03251T y0  0.00067[ 2
lin 4 § D xy · 1  0.84536 T x0  0.48354 T y 0  0.07863[ (4-b)
q cl DK ¨1  Q  ¸
  3.75514 T x 0  2.48878 T y 0  0.16081
 all
R 2 ¨ D ¸¹ K 1
© 
2 K xy 1  Q
Fig.6 ࡟ᩘ್ゎᯒࡼࡾồࡵࡓ⥺ᙧ඲యᗙᒅⲴ㔜 Pcrlinall ࡜ᘧ(3)ࡢẚ㍑
(2) ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬Fig.5 ࡜ẚ࡭ࡿ࡜ᕪࡀ኱ࡁ࠸ࡀᇶᮏⓗ࡟ࡣ୍⮴ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬
3 3 EA EA 3
K , K xy ࠉ
4 l0 4l 0 1.5 1.5
all qcl all  J all  Pcrlinall es
Pcrlin
lin lin
qcr
3 3 EI x EI x 3 1.4 Pin Roller er Rise/span 1.4
D , D xy 1.3 0.075 1.3
4 l0 2l 0 0.1
1.2 0.125 1.2
ࡇࡇ࡛ K㸪Kxy ࡣ㠃ෆ᭷ຠ๛ᛶ㸪D㸪Dxy ࡣ㠃እ᭷ຠ๛ᛶࢆ⾲ࢃࡍ㸬ṇ 1.1 1.1
୕ゅᙧ⥙┠ࡢሙྜ ν=1/3 ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ᩘ್ゎᯒ࡟ࡼࡾồࡵࡽࢀࡓ⥺ᙧ඲ 1.0 1.0
0.9 0.9 Pin er Rise/span
Roller
lin
యᗙᒅⲴ㔜 qcr lin 0.075
0 075
all ࢆྂ඾ᗙᒅⲴ㔜 q clall ࡜ẚ㍑ࡋ㸪⢭ᗘࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿ㸬 0.8 0.8 0.1
0.125
Fig.5 ࡟ ⥺ ᙧ ᗙ ᒅ Ⲵ 㔜 ẚ ⋡ qcr
lin lin lin lin
all qcrm ࢆ ᶓ ㍈ 㸪 q crall qclall 0.7 0.7
qcrlin all qcllin m qcrlin all qcllin m
 J all  ࢆ⦪㍈࡟ྂ඾ⓗ⌮ㄽ್࡜ FEM ࡟ࡼࡿ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ⤖ᯝ࡜ࡢ 0.6 0.6
1.5 2 2.5 1.5 2 2.5
all qcrm =1.1㸪1.25 ࡢࣔࢹࣝࡣྠᵝࡢ
lin lin
㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ࣆࣥᨭᣢࡢ qcr Fig.5 The ratio of Eq.(2) to analysis Fig.6 The ratio of Eq.(3) to analysis

1st 15th 1st 27th 1st 37th 1st 61th

0.075_Pin_1.25 model 0.075_Pin_1.5 model 0.075_Pin_2.0 model 0.075_Roller_2.5 model

1st 28th 1st 30th 1st 45th 1st 55th

0 1 Pi
0.1_Pin_1.5 model
d l 0.1_Roller_1.5
0 1 R l model
d l 0.1_Roller_2.0 model 0.1_Roller_2.5 model

1st 7th 1st 37th 1st 29th 1st 44th

0.125_Pin_1.1
1 model
d l 0.125_Pin_2.0 model
d l 0.125_Roller_1.5 model 0.125_Roller_2.0 model
Fig.4 Example of buckling mode

─ 661 ─
3.3 ᭷ຠᗙᒅ㛗ࡉ Table2 ࡢ k(=lb(E)/l(E))ࡣᗙᒅ㛗ࡉಀᩘ㸪 l(E)ࡣಶᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦ㛗ࡉ
௒ᅇࡣᙉ㍈࡜ᙅ㍈ࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡀᴟ➃࡟␗࡞ࡿⅭ㸪ಶᮦᗙᒅࡣࢩ࢙ ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ᗙᒅ㛗ࡉಀᩘ k ࡣࣆࣥᨭᣢࡢሙྜᴫࡡ 0.7㸪࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ
ࣝ㠃ෆ࡛⏕ࡌࡸࡍ࠸࡜⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿ㸬ᩥ⊩ 2)ࡢಶᮦᗙᒅ࡟ᑐࡍࡿಶᮦ ࡢሙྜ 0.5 ࡜࡞ࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪㖄┤Ⲵ㔜࡟ᑐࡍࡿ㍈ຊศᕸᅗࢆ Fig.9 ࡟
ᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦࢆ⏝࠸ࡓタィἲ࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡣ㸪᭷ຠᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࡣ๛᥋ྜࡢ ♧ࡍ㸬㯮⥺ࡣᅽ⦰㒊ᮦ㸪⅊⥺ࡣᘬᙇ㒊ᮦࢆ♧ࡍ㸬⥺ࡢኴࡉࡣ㍈ຊࡢ
ሙྜ⠇Ⅼ㛫㊥㞳࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡋ࠿ࡋ㸪༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙࡛ࣝࡣ㏻ᖖ㸪ಶᮦ ኱ࡁࡉࢆ⾲ࢃࡍ㸬ࣆࣥᨭᣢࡢሙྜ㸪࡯ࡰ୍ᵝ࡞ᅽ⦰ຊࡢศᕸ࡛࠶ࡿ
ᗙᒅࡣ 1 㒊ᮦࡢࡳ࡛࡞ࡃ㸪࠶ࡿ⠇Ⅼࡢἲ⥺ࡲࢃࡾࡢᅇ㌿࡟ࡼࡾ」ᩘ ࡀ㸪࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࡢሙྜ㸪➃㒊࡛ࡣࡏࢇ᩿ኚᙧࡀ⏕ࡌᘬᙇ࡜ᅽ⦰ࡀ
ࡢ㒊ᮦ࡟⏕ࡌࡿ (Fig.4)㸬ࡇࡢ࡜ࡁ㸪᭷ຠᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࢆ⠇Ⅼ㛫㊥㞳࡜ࡍ ΰᅾࡋ㸪ࡉࡽ࡟〈ᱱ࡟ࡣ኱ࡁ࡞ᘬᙇࡀ⏕ࡌ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬ᅽ⦰ࢆཷࡅࡿಶ
ࡿ࡜ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆ㐣ᑠ࡟ホ౯ࡍࡿ㸬౛࠼ࡤ Fig.7 ࡢ༢఩භゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࢆ ᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦ࡜᥋⥆ࡍࡿ㒊ᮦࡣᘬᙇᮦ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ᗙᒅ⿵๛ࡢᙺ๭ࢆ
⪃࠼ࡿ࡜㸪ᨺᑕ᪉ྥ㒊ᮦࡀ 1 Ἴࡢᗙᒅࢆ㉳ࡇࡍ࡜๛᥋ྜࡉࢀࡓ෇࿘ ᯝࡓࡍ㸬ᨾ࡟ᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࡣࣆࣥᨭᣢࡢሙྜࡼࡾࡉࡽ࡟▷ࡃ࡞ࡿ㸬
㒊ᮦࡣ⠇Ⅼࡢᅇ㌿࡟ࡼࡾ㸪2 Ἴࡢᗙᒅ࡜࡞ࡿ㸬ࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ᗙᒅ࣮ࣔ
ࢻࡀ⌧ࢀࡓሙྜ㸪༢఩୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚ 1 㒊ᮦࡢ᭷ຠᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࡣ⠇Ⅼ㛫㊥ 4 ᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒ
㞳ࡼࡾ▷ࡃ࡞ࡾ㸪㒊ᮦ㛗ࡉ࡟ᑐࡍࡿᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࡢẚࢆ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ἲ 13) 4.1 ึᮇ୙ᩚ
࡛ồࡵࡿ࡜ 0.71 ࡜࡞ࡿ(௜㘓)㸬 ྛࣔࢹ࡛ࣝ 1 ḟࡢಶᮦᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻẚ౛ᆺ㸪㧗ḟࡢ඲యᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻ
ಶᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦࡣᘧ(5)ࡢ Oi  ࡀ᭱ᑠ࡜࡞ࡿ㒊ᮦ࡜ࡍࡿ 2)㸬 ẚ౛ᆺࢆึᮇ୙ᩚ࡟୚࠼ࡓ 2 ✀㢮ࡢࣔࢹࣝࢆసᡂࡍࡿ㸬ึᮇ୙ᩚࡢ
᣺ᖜࡣ㸪ಶᮦᗙᒅẚ౛ᆺࡢ࡜ࡁ l0 ࡟ᑐࡋ 1/100014)㸪඲యᗙᒅẚ౛ᆺ
S 2 EI y
O(i ) N0(i ) (5) ࡢ࡜ࡁࡣᩥ⊩ 2)࡟ᚑ࠸ࢫࣃࣥ࡟ᑐࡋ 1/1000 ࡜ࡋࡓ㸬඲యᗙᒅ࣮ࣔ
lk (i ) 2
ࢻẚ౛ᆺࡢึᮇ୙ᩚࡢ᭱኱᣺ᖜࡣ➼౯ᯈཌ teq(ᘧ(7))ࡢ 20%(௒ᅇࡣ
ࡇࡇ࡛ Oi  ࡣⲴ㔜ಀᩘ㸪N0(i)ࡣྛ⠇Ⅼ࡟ᇶ‽Ⲵ㔜(ࡇࡇ࡛ࡣ P0)ࢆ㖄 ඲ࣔࢹ࡛ࣝ 62mm)ࡼࡾᑠࡉ࠸㸬
┤ୗྥࡁ࡟୚࠼ࡓ࡜ࡁࡢ i 㒊ᮦࡢ㍈ຊ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ಶᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦࡢ l0
t eq 2 3 ˜ rg ࠉࠉࠉࠉࠉࠉrg (7)
㍈ຊࡣ N0(E)࡜ࡍࡿ㸬lk(i)ࡣ⠇Ⅼ㛫㊥㞳࡜ࡍࡿ㸬௨ᚋᘧ(5)࡛⟬ฟࡉࢀࡓ O0
Oi  ࡢ᭱ᑠ್ࢆ Olin
E ࡛⾲ࢃࡍ㸬௒ᅇࡢࣔࢹ࡛ࣝࡣᨭᣢ᮲௳࡟ࡼࡽࡎ㸪 ௨㝆඲యᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻẚ౛ᆺึᮇ୙ᩚࢆ୚࠼ࡓሙྜ㸪ࣔࢹࣝྡࡢᮎᑿ
ಶᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦࡢ఩⨨ࡣྠ୍࡛࠶ࡿ(Fig.8)㸬 ࡟(_all)ࢆ㸪ಶᮦᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻẚ౛ᆺึᮇ୙ᩚࢆ୚࠼ࡓሙྜ(_m)ࢆࡘࡅ
lin
⥺ᙧಶᮦᗙᒅⲴ㔜 qcr lin
m ࡟ᑐᛂࡍࡿⲴ㔜ಀᩘࢆ Ocrm ࡜ࡍࡿ㸬 ࡿ㸬౛࠼ࡤ㸪ึᮇ୙ᩚࢆ඲యᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻẚ౛ᆺ࡜ࡋࡓࠕ0.1 _Pin_1.5ࠖ
Olin
crm ࡜ Olin
E ࢆẚ㍑ࡍࡿ࡜ࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡛ࡣ⣙ 2 ಸ㸪࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡛ࡣ ࣔࢹࣝࡣࠕ0.1_Pin_1.5_allࠖ࡜⾲グࡍࡿ㸬
4 ಸ࡛࠶ࡿ (Table2)㸬ᘧ(5)ࡢ Oi  ࢆ Olin
crm ࡜ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛ᘧ(6)࠿ࡽಶ
ᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦࡢ᭷ຠᗙᒅ㛗ࡉ lb(E)ࢆ㏫⟬ࡍࡿ࡜ Table2 ࡢᩘ್࡜࡞
ࡿ㸬

S 2 EI y
lb ( E ) (6)
Olin
cr  m N 0( E )
Fig.7 Unit hexagonal grid

Table 2 Load factor and effective buckling length

Olin
E Olin
cr m Olin lin
E Ocr  m l b(E) k
1.1 237.1 487.7 0.49 2084.9 0.70
1.25 204.5 423.2 0.48 2078.6 0.70
0.075 1.5 167.3 348.5 0.48 2071.7 0.69
2 125.5 263.3 0.48 2063.9 0.69
2.5 100.4 211.5 0.47 2059.7 0.69
1.1 378.9 822.6 0.46 2093.4 0.68
1.25 330.3 722.0 0.46 2086.2 0.68
0.1 1.5 Pin 269.0 593.2 0.45 2077.0 0.67
2 201.7 449.1 0.45 2067.2 0.67
Specific member of member buckling
2.5 161.4 361.3 0.45 2061.4 0.67 Fig.8 Specific member of member buckling
1.1 546.1 1252.0 0.44 2126.6 0.66
1.25 475.5 1099.0 0.43 2118.1 0.66
0.125 1.5 388.7 908.0 0.43 2106.9 0.65
2 291.5 688.9 0.42 2094.6 0.65
2.5 233.2 555.0 0.42 2087.4 0.65
1.5 78.5 295.4 0.27 1541.7 0.52
0.075 2 58.8 224.1 0.26 1531.7 0.51
2.5 47.0 180.4 0.26 1526.3 0.51
1.5 115.7 476.3 0.24 1520.0 0.49
0.1 2 Roller 86.6 363.5 0.24 1505.3 0.49
2.5 69.2 293.9 0.24 1496.6 0.49
1.5 157.1 676.2 0.23 1552.1 0.48 0.1_pin_1.5 0.1_roller_1.5
0.125 2 117.5 519.1 0.23 1531.9 0.48
2.5 93.8 421.3 0.22 1519.7 0.47 Compression Tension
Fig.9 Axial force distribution

─ 662 ─
4.2 ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘ Table 3 Knockdown factor of elastic buckling analysis
Initial imperfection type
ᗙᒅ๓ኚᙧࡢᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓᘼ㛗ἲ࡟ࡼࡿᙎᛶ㠀⥺ qcrlin all Member buckling mode proprtional Overall buckling mode proprtional
Rise/Span Boundary member overall member overall
ᙧゎᯒ(௨ᚋ㸪ᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒ)ࢆ⾜࠺㸬ᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒ࡛ᚓࡿᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆ qcrlin m
α 0-m α 0-all α 0-m α 0-all
e
௨ᚋ㸪ᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜 qcr ࡛⾲ࢃࡍ㸬ᗙᒅⅬࡣⲴ㔜ኚᙧ᭤⥺ࡀ᫂☜࡟ 1.1 0.63 0.46
1.25 0.63 0.46
ᢡࢀ᭤ࡀࡿⅬ(ศᒱⅬ)㸪᫂☜࡞ᢡࢀⅬࡢ࡞࠸ሙྜࡣ᭱኱Ⲵ㔜Ⅼ(ᴟ㝈 0.075 1.5 0.88 0.46
2.0 0.97 0.46
Ⅼ)࡜ࡍࡿ㸬ࡲࡓᗙᒅⅬ࡟࠾ࡅࡿቑศኚ఩࣮ࣔࢻࢆほᐹࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛㸪 2.5 1.04 1.01
1.1 0.66 0.64
⏕ࡌࡓᗙᒅࡢ✀㢮ࢆุ᩿ࡍࡿ㸬ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࡣᗙᒅࡢ✀㢮࡟ᛂ 1.25 0.65 0.64
0.1 Pin 1.5 0.90 0.93
ࡌ࡚㸪๓㏙ࡋࡓ 1 ḟࡢ⥺ᙧಶᮦᗙᒅⲴ㔜 qcr
lin
m 㸪ࡲࡓࡣ㧗ḟࡢ⥺ᙧ඲
2.0 0.98 0.99
2.5 1.03 1.08
lin e 1.1 0.72 0.71
యᗙᒅⲴ㔜 qcr all ࡜ qcr ࡢẚ⋡࡟ࡼࡾᐃ⩏ࡍࡿ(ᘧ(8))㸬 1.25 0.71 0.70
0.125 1.5 0.94 0.96
e e
q cr q cr 2.0 0.99 1.00
D 0 m 㸪 D 0 all (8) 2.5 1.04 1.01
lin lin
q cr m q cr  all 1.5 0.38 0.41
0.075 2.0 0.42 0.40
2.5 0.85 0.89
Table3 ࡟௬ᐃࡋࡓึᮇ୙ᩚࡢᆺ࡜ᑐᛂࡉࡏ࡚ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘ 1.5 0.45 0.40
0.1 Roller 2.0 0.42 0.40
α0-m㸪α0-all ࢆ♧ࡍ㸬 2.5 0.93 0.89
1.5 0.47 0.43
 ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿሙྜ㸪ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࡣ 1 ௜㏆࡜ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ 0.125 2.0 0.44 0.42
2.5 0.99 0.95
ࡿ 2)㸬ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿሙྜࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘ α0-m ࡣ௒ᅇࡢゎ
1.2 1.2
ᯒ࡛ࡣ 0.9㹼1.0 ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬୍᪉඲యᗙᒅࢆ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜ㸪▴ᙧᖹ㠃ࡢࣛ lin
q qcr
crall or m F) q q crlin all or m
1 D) J)
1
ࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࡢ᥎ᐃᘧ 1)࡛ࡣ ξ0(ᘧ(9))ࡀ 2.4 ௨ୖ I)

(ᮏࣔࢹ࡛ࣝࡣ 13.0㸪9.6㸪7.6)࡛ 0.5 ࡜࡞ࡿ㸬 0.8 C)) E) 0.8

B)
0.6 0.075_Pin_1.25_all 0.6
0.075_Pin_1.25_m H)
12 2 A)
0.1_Pin_1.5_all 0.075_Pin_1.5_all
[0 (9) 0.4 0.1_Pin_1.5_m 0.4 G) 0.075_Pin_1.5_m
O0T 0 0.125_Pin_2.0_all 0.075_Pin_2.0_all
0.2 0.125_Pin_1.1_m 0.2 0.075_Pin_2.0_m
G G crlin G G crlin
඲యᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿሙྜࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘ α0-all ࡣᮏゎᯒ࡛ࣆࣥ 0 0
ᨭᣢࡣᴫࡡ୍⮴ࡍࡿࡀ㸪࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࡢሙྜ 0.4 ௜㏆࡜࡞ࡗࡓ㸬 0 1 2 0 1 2
a) Member and overall b) Change of buckling type
4.3 ᙎᛶᗙᒅᣲື according to initial imperfection
ࣆࣥᨭᣢࡢሙྜࡢⲴ㔜ኚᙧ᭤⥺࡜ᗙᒅⅬ࡟࠾ࡅࡿቑศኚ఩࣮ࣔࢻ
ࡢ౛ࢆ Fig.10-a㸪10-b ࡟♧ࡍ㸬⦪㍈ࡣ⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࡢ✀㢮࡟ᑐᛂࡋࡓ
lin lin overall overall overall member
⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜 qcr all 㸪 qcrm ࡛㸪ᶓ㍈ࡣኚ఩ࢆ⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡟ᑐᛂࡍ
ࡍ
A)0.075_Pin_1.25_all
_all B)0.075_Pin_1.25_m
25_m C)0.125_Pin_1.1_m 1_m D)0.1_Pin_1.5_all
ࡿ⥺ᙧኚ఩ G crlin ࡛↓ḟඖ໬ࡋࡓ㸬 (α0-all=0.46) (α0-all=0.63) (α0-all=0.72)) (α0-m=0.93)
Fig.10-a ࡛ࡣ⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜ẚ⋡ qcr
lin
all qcrm ࡀ 1.25 ௨ୗ࡛࠶ࢀ
lin

ࡤ඲యᗙᒅࡀ㸪1.5 ௨ୖ࡛࠶ࢀࡤಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬ࡲࡓᙎ
ᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࡣ㸪඲యᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿሙྜ 0.46㹼0.72 ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ಶ member member
ᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿሙྜࡣ 0.88㹼1.08 ࡛㸪ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿሙྜ࡛
࡛ E)0.1_Pin_1.5_m F)0.125_Pin_2.0_all
(α0-m=0.90) (α0-m=1.00)
ࡶᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࡢᙳ㡪ࢆከᑡࡣཷࡅࡿ㸬
ࡲࡓಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿ㝿㸪ᅽ⦰㍈ຊࡀ᭱኱࡜࡞ࡿ㒊ᮦࢆ୰ᚰ࡟
ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬Fig.11-a ࡣᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜᫬ࡢ㍈ຊศᕸᅗ
overall overall member member
ࡢ౛ࢆ㸪Fig.11-b ࡣྠࡌⲴ㔜࡛ࣞ࣋ࣝࡢ⥺ᙧゎᯒࡢ㍈ຊศᕸࡢ౛ࢆ
ࢆ G)0.075_Pin_1.5_all
_all H) 0.075_Pin_2.0_all
_all I) 0.075_Pin_1.5_m J) 0.0
0.075_Pin_2.0_m
♧ࡍ㸬⥺ࡢኴࡉࡣ㍈ຊࡢ኱ࡁࡉࢆ⾲ࢃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬ᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶ
ᛶ (α0-all=0.46) (α0-all=0.46) (α0-m=0.88) ((α0-m=0.97)

ࢆ⪃៖ࡍࡿ࡜ಶᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦࢆྵࡴࢩ࢙ࣝ࿘㎶㒊ࡢ㒊ᮦ⩌ࡢ㍈ຊ Fig.10 Example of elastic buckling analysis result with pin support
ࡀ┦ᑐⓗ࡟኱ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿ㸬
ᡥᖹ࡞ࢩ࢙࡛ࣝࡣ㸪୚࠼ࡿึᮇ୙ᩚ࡟ࡼࡾㄏⓎࡍࡿᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻࡀ
ኚ ໬ ࡍ ࡿ ሙ ྜ ࡀ ࠶ ࡿ 㸬 ࣛ ࢖ ࢬ /ࢫ ࣃ ࣥ ẚ 0.075 ࡜ ᡥ ᖹ ࡞ ࢩ ࢙ ࣝ
(0.075_pin_1.5 ࡜ 0.075_pin_2.0)ࡢሙྜ㸪ึᮇ୙ᩚࡀಶᮦᗙᒅ࣮ࣔ
ࢻẚ౛࡞ࡽࡤಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ㸪඲యᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻẚ౛࡞ࡽࡤ඲యᗙᒅࡀㄏ
Ⓨࡉࢀࡿ(Fig.10-b)㸬
Fig.12-a㸪12-b ࡣ࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࡢሙྜࡢⲴ㔜ኚᙧ᭤⥺࡜ቑศኚ఩

all qcrm ࡀ 2.0 ௨ୗ࡛࠶ࢀࡤ඲యᗙᒅࡀ㸪

lin lin
࣮ࣔࢻࡢ౛࡛࠶ࡾ㸪 qcr
2.5 ௨ୖ࡛࠶ࢀࡤಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡿ㸬ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࡣ඲యᗙᒅ a)) Nonlinear Analysis
y b)) Linear Analysis
y
ࡀ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜ 0.4 ௜㏆㸪ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿሙྜࡣࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡜ྠᵝ Fig.11 Axial force distribution (0.1_Pin_1.5_all)

࡟ 0.85㹼0.99 ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬

─ 663 ─
 ࡲࡓ࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡟㝈ࡾ㸪඲యᗙᒅ࡜ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ࡯ࡰྠ᫬࡟Ⓨ⏕ ᩥ⊩ 2)࡛ࡣ 1 ḟ࡛ಶᮦᗙᒅⓎ⏕ࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿ㝿ࡣᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒࢆ⾜
ࡍࡿሙྜࡀ࠶ࡿ(Fig.12-b)㸬ࡇࡢሙྜࡶᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࡣᴫࡡ 0.4 ࠸㸪⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࡢ✀㢮ࢆ☜ㄆࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ᥎ዡࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡀ㸪ࡇࡢ⤖ᯝ
࡜࡞ࡾ㸪඲యᗙᒅ࡟ศ㢮ࡋࡓ㸬Fig.13-a㸪Fig.13-b ࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀᙎᛶ ࢆࡑࡢࡲࡲά⏝ࡍࢀࡤ㸪ᮏ◊✲࡜ྠᵝࡢࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣ⥺
ᗙᒅゎᯒ᫬㸪⥺ᙧゎᯒ᫬ࡢ㍈ຊศᕸᅗ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬㍈ຊࡢศᕸࡣṤ࡝ኚ ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒࡢࡳ࡛ᗙᒅࡢ✀㢮ࡀண᝿࡛ࡁࡿ㸬༶ࡕ㸯ḟ࡟ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ
ࢃࡽࡎ㍈ຊ᭱኱㒊ᮦࡀಶᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬 ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜࡣ㧗ḟࡢ඲యᗙᒅࡀ⌧ࢀࡿḟᩘࡲ࡛ᅛ᭷್ゎᯒࢆᐇ᪋ࡋ㸪

all qcrm ࡀࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡛ࡣᴫࡡ 1.5,࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡛ࡣᴫࡡ 2 ௨ୗ

lin lin
qcr
5. ᙎᛶᗙᒅ࡟࠾࠸࡚Ⓨ⏕ࡍࡿᗙᒅ ࡛࠶ࢀࡤ඲యᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡿ࡜ண ࡛ࡁࡿ㸬
5.1 ᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡜⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢ㛵ಀ 5.2 ⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࢆண ࡍࡿ⡆᫆࡞ᣦᶆ
 ๓❶࡛⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ࡛ࡣ 1 ḟ࡛ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿሙྜ࡛ࡶ㸪ᙎ ಶᮦᗙᒅ㸪඲యᗙᒅࡢ࡝ࡕࡽࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿ࠿ุ᩿ࡍࡿᣦᶆ࡜ࡋ࡚ᘧ
ᛶᗙᒅゎᯒ࡛ࡣ඲యᗙᒅࡀඛ⾜ࡍࡿሙྜࡀ࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋࡓ㸬 (9)ࡢࢩ࢙ࣝࡽࡋࡉಀᩘ ξ0 ࡀᥦ᱌ࡉࢀ࡚࠾ࡾ 2)㸪ξ0 ࡀᴫࡡ 4 ௨ୖ࡞ࡽ
⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡜ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࢆ⏝࠸࡚඲యᗙᒅࡀඛ⾜ࡍࡿ᮲ ࡤ඲యᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡿ࡜ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ 7)15)㸬ξ ࡣࡶ࡜ࡶ࡜඲యᗙᒅࢆ⾲
0

௳ࡣᘧ(10-a) ࡢ୙➼ᘧ࡛⾲ࢃࡏࡿ㸬ᘧ(10-a)ࢆ⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢẚ࡛ ⌧ࡋࡓྂ඾ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆ⠇ⅬᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡛↓ḟඖ໬ࡋ࡚ᐃࡵࡽࢀࡓࡶࡢ

⾲ࢃࡍ࡜ᘧ(10-b)࡜࡞ࡿ㸬 ࡛࠶ࡿ 6)㸬ࡇࢀࡽ᪤ ࡢ◊✲࡛ࡣ㗰⟶᩿㠃ࡀ௬ᐃࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࡀ㸪ᮏ

lin lin ◊✲ࡢࣔࢹ࡛ࣝࡣᙉ㍈ࡲࢃࡾࡢ⣽㛗ẚ࡛ ξ0 ࢆ⟬ᐃࡍࡿ࡜ 4 ࢆ㉺࠼ࡿ

D 0all ˜ q cr  all d D 0 m ˜ q cr  m (10-a)
ࣔࢹ࡛ࣝࡶಶᮦᗙᒅࡍࡿሙྜࡀ࠶ࡿ㸬

lin ࡇࡇ࡛ࡣ H ᙧ㗰ࡢࡼ࠺࡟ᙉᙅ㍈ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ᩿㠃࡛࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ㋃ࡲ

qcr D 0 m
 all
lin
d  DH  (10-b) ࠼㸪඲యᗙᒅࢆ⾲⌧ࡍࡿྂ඾ᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡜㸪ᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓ㠃ෆ
qcr m D0all
ࡢಶᮦᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢ⌮ㄽゎࢆẚ㍑ࡋ㸪⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࢆᵓ㐀⥴ඖ࡜⥺ᙧゎ
ࡇࡇ࡛ࡣᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘẚ αH=α0-m/α0-all ࢆᑟධࡋࡓ㸬αH ࡣ୺࡟ ᯒࢆ⏝࠸ุ࡚ᐃࡍࡿᣦᶆ ξH ࢆᑟࡃ㸬ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜࡢᙎᛶᗙ
ᙧ≧࡜ᨭᣢ᮲௳࡟ࡼࡾỴࡲࡿ㸬ࣛ࢖ࢬ/ࢫࣃࣥẚ࡜ αH ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ Fig.14 ᒅపῶಀᩘࡶ⪃៖ࡍࡿ㸬
࡟♧ࡍ㸬Fig.14 ࡢ್ࡣࣛ࢖ࢬ/ࢫࣃࣥẚࡈ࡜ࡢᖹᆒ್࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ࣆࣥᨭ  ᗄఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓ඲యᗙᒅࡀඛ⾜ࡍࡿ᮲௳ࡣᘧ(10-a)
ᣢࡢሙྜ αH=1.58㸪࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࡢሙྜ αH=2.18 ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࣆࣥᨭᣢ lin
࡛⾲ࢃࡏࡿ㸬ࡇࡇ࡛⥺ᙧಶᮦᗙᒅⲴ㔜 qcr m ࡜⥺ᙧ඲యᗙᒅⲴ㔜
ࡣࣛ࢖ࢬ/ࢫࣃࣥẚ࡟㈇ࡢ┦㛵ࡀ࠶ࡿࡀ㸪ᖹᆒ್ࢆ࡜ࡗ࡚ 1.58 ࡜ࡍ lin
qcr all ࡣࡑࢀࡒࢀᘧ(11)ࡢࡼ࠺࡞㛵ಀࡀ࠶ࡿ㸬
lin lin
ࡿ㸬ࡇࢀ࡜ᑐᛂࡋ࡚ࣆࣥᨭᣢ࡛ࡣ qcr qcr 㸻2.0(>1.58)ࡢࣔࢹ lin
all m lin
qcr m Olin
cr ( E ) ˜ q 0 㸪 qcr all J all ˜ qcllinall (11)
all qcrm =2.5(>2.18)௨ୖ࡛ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡋ
lin lin
ࣝ㸪࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ qcr
࡚࠸ࡿ㸬 ࡇࡇ࡛㸪 Olin
cr( E ) ࡣಶᮦᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡿሙྜࡢ⥺ᙧಶᮦᗙᒅⲴ㔜ಀᩘ
࡛࠶ࡾ㸪ᗙᒅ㛗ࡉಀᩘ k ࢆᐃࡵࡿࡇ࡜࡛㸪ᘧ(12)࡛⟬ᐃ࡛ࡁࡿ㸬
1.2 0.5
q lin
qcr lin
q qcr
1
all or m
P)
all T) S 2 EI y
N) 0.4
S)
Olin (12)
0.8 O)
R)
Q
Q) cr ( E )
k ˜ l( E ) 2 N 0( E )
0.3
0.6 0.1_Roller_1.5_all
M) 0.1_Roller_1.5_m ๓㏙ࡋࡓࡼ࠺࡟㸪l(E)ࡣಶᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦࡢ㛗ࡉ㸪N0(E)ࡣᇶ‽Ⲵ㔜ࢆ
L) 0.125_Roller_1.5_m 0.2 0.075_Roller_1.5_all
0.4 0.075_Roller_2.5_all 0.075_Roller_1.5_m ୚࠼ࡓ᫬ࡢಶᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦࡢ㍈ຊ㸪Iy ࡣᙅ㍈ࡲࢃࡾࡢ᩿㠃஧ḟࣔ
K) 0.075_Roller_2.5_m 0.1_Roller_2.0_all
0.2 0.1 0.1_Roller_2.0_m
0.1_Roller_2.5_all ࣮࣓ࣥࢺ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡉࡽ࡟㸪➼ศᕸⲴ㔜࡟ࡼࡿᖹᆒⓗ࡞㒊ᮦ㍈ຊ Ng ࡣ
G G crlin G G crlin
0 0 ➼౯࡞㐃⥆యࢩ࢙ࣝࡢ⭷ᛂຊ࡟ࡼࡾᘧ(13)࡛ᴫ⟬࡛ࡁࡿ㸬
0 1 2 0 0.5 1 1.5
q0 Rl0
a) Member and overall b) Member and overall Ng (13)
occurs simultaneously 2 3
ࡇࡇ࡛㸪q0 ࡣᇶ‽Ⲵ㔜 P0 ࡜㈇ᢸ㠃✚ S ࡼࡾồࡵࡽࢀࡿศᕸⲴ㔜
(q0=P0/S)㸪R ࡣࢩ࢙ࣝ᭤⋡༙ᚄ㸪l0 ࡣᖹᆒ㒊ᮦ㛗ࡉ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬Ng ࡜ಶᮦ
overall overall member
overall ᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦࡢ㍈ຊ N0(E)࡜ࡢẚ⋡ࢆ㍈ຊゎᯒಀᩘ γN(=N0(E)/Ng)࡜ࡍ
ᗙ
.5_m M) 0.125_Roller_1.5_m N)0.0
5_all L) 0.1_Roller_1.5_m
K) 0.1_Roller_1.5_all N)0.075_Roller_2.5_all
(α0-all=0.40) (α0-all=0.45)) (α0-all=0.47) (α0-m=0.89) ࡿ㸬γN ࡣ⥺ᙧゎᯒࡼࡾᐜ᫆࡟⟬ฟ࡛ࡁ㸪ࣆࣥᨭᣢࡣ γN㸻1.0 ௜㏆࡛
࠶ࡿࡀ࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࡣ γN =2.5~3.0 ࡜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬᳜ᮌ 6)ࡣᅄ㝮ࣆ
ࣥ㸪࿘㎶࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡜ࡋࡓሙྜࡣ γN㸻4.7 ⛬ᗘ࡜ࡋ࡚࠾ࡾ㸪ᨭᣢ
member member ᮲௳࡟ࡼࡾ㍈ຊ࡟኱ࡁ࡞㐪࠸ࡀ࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬
O) 0.075_Roller_2.5_m
5_m P) 0.1_Roller_2.5_all
(α0-m=0.85) (α0-m=0.89)

overall overall overall

overall +member +mem
+member +memmber
+member
5_all R) 0.075_Roller_1.5_m
Q) 0.075_Roller_1.5_all .5_m S) 0.1_Roller_2.0_all
2.0_all
ll T) 0.1_Roller_2.0_m
(α0-all=0.41) (α0-all=0.38) (α0-all=0.40)
0) (α0-all=0.42)
a)) Nonlinear Analysis
y b)) Linear Analysis
y
Fig.12 Example of elastic buckling analysis result with roller support Fig.13 Axial force distribution (0.1_Roller_1.5_all)

─ 664 ─
γall ࡣ FEM ゎᯒࡢ⌮ㄽ್࡟ᑐࡍࡿẚ⋡࡛࠶ࡾ Fig.5 ࡢ⦪㍈ࡢ್࡛࠶ 6. ࡲ࡜ࡵ
ࡿ㸬ᮏ◊✲࡛⏝࠸ࡓ γall ࡢ್ࡣ Table4 ࡟♧ࡍࡀ㸪Fig5 ࡼࡾ γall ࢆᴫࡡ  ᮏ◊✲ࡣ㸪᩿㠃ࡢᙉ㍈࡜ᙅ㍈ࡢ᭤ࡆ๛ᛶࡀ኱ᖜ࡟␗࡞ࡿ H ᙧ㗰ࡢ
1 ࡜ࡋ࡚ࡶࡼ࠸࡛࠶ࢁ࠺㸬ᘧ(10-a)࡟㸪ᘧ(2)㸪(11)㸪(12)㸪(13)ࢆ௦ ࡼ࠺࡞㒊ᮦ࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀࡓ㸪ṇ᪉ᙧᖹ㠃ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿ⌫ᙧ୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚ༢ᒙ
ධࡋ࡚ࢩ࢙ࣝࡽࡋࡉಀᩘࢆ⏝࠸ࡿ࡜ᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻศ㢮ᣦᶆ ξH ࡀᘧ(14) ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝᵓ㐀ࢆᑐ㇟࡜ࡋ࡚㸪ಶᮦᗙᒅ࡜඲యᗙᒅࡢⓎ⏕᮲௳࡟
࡛⾲ࢃࡉࢀࡿ㸬 ╔┠ࡋ㸪⥺ᙧཬࡧᙎᛶᗙᒅゎᯒࢆᐇ᪋ࡋࡓ㸬ᗙᒅࡢศ㢮࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡣ
ಶᮦᗙᒅࡢ⏕ࡌࡿ㸯ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ௨እ࡟㸪᭱ึ࡟඲యᗙᒅࡀฟ⌧ࡍࡿ㧗
I y l0 2D H 48
[H [0 t 4.86 (14) ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡜ࡑࡢᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡟ὀ┠ࡋࡓ㸬௨ୗෆᐜࢆࡲ࡜ࡵࡿ㸬
I xJ N J alllb 2 S2
1) ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒࡢ 1 ḟ࣮ࣔࢻ࡛ಶᮦᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿሙྜ࡛ࡶ㸪ᗄ
ࡇࡇ࡛ lb㸻k™l(E)࡛࠶ࡿ㸬ࡇࡢ᮲௳ᘧࡼࡾ㸪ξH ࡀᴫࡡ 5 ௨ୖ࡛࠶ࢀࡤ ఱᏛⓗ㠀⥺ᙧᛶࡢᙳ㡪࡛㸪ᙎᛶᗙᒅᣲື࡟࠾࠸࡚ᮏ᮶㧗ḟ࡟࠶
඲యᗙᒅࡍࡿ࡜࠸࠼ࡿ㸬 Fig.15 ࡟ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘ α0 ࡜㸪ᗙᒅࣔ ࡿ඲యᗙᒅࡀඛ⾜ࡋ࡚⏕ࡌࡿሙྜࡀ࠶ࡿ㸬ࡇࢀࡣ≉࡟࣮࣮ࣟࣛ
࣮ࢻศ㢮ᣦᶆ ξH ࡢ㛵ಀࢆ♧ࡍ㸬ࡇࢀࡲ࡛ࡢ᳨ウࡼࡾ αH㸪γall㸪k ࡣࣆ ᨭᣢࡉࢀࡓሙྜ࡟㢧ⴭ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬
ࣥᨭᣢ࡜࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡛ࡑࢀࡒࢀ Table4 ࡢ್ࢆ⏝࠸ࡿ㸬α0 ࡣ α0-m㸪 2) ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒ⤖ᯝࢆ⏝࠸ࡿ࡜㸪㧗ḟࡢ඲యᗙᒅⲴ㔜࡜ 1 ḟࡢಶ
lin lin
α0-all ࡝ࡕࡽࡶྵࡴࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡾ㸪0.8 ௨ୖࡢࣉࣟࢵࢺࡀಶᮦᗙᒅ㸪0.8 ᮦᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢẚ⋡ qcr all / qcr m ࡀࣆࣥᨭᣢࡢሙྜᴫࡡ 1.5 ௨
ᮍ‶ࡢࣉࣟࢵࢺࡀ඲యᗙᒅࢆ⾲ࢃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ㸬ⓑᢤࡁࡣࣆࣥᨭᣢ㸪ሬ ୗ㸪࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࡢሙྜ 2.0 ௨ୗ࡛඲యᗙᒅࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿ㸬
ࡾࡘࡪࡋࡣ࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࢆ♧ࡍ㸬๓㏙ࡋࡓึᮇ୙ᩚ࡟ᛂࡌ࡚ᗙᒅࣔ 3) ಶᮦᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢホ౯࡟࠾࠸࡚㸪᭷ຠᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࢆ⠇Ⅼ㛫㊥㞳࡜ࡍ
࣮ࢻࡀኚ໬ࡍࡿࣛ࢖ࢬ/ࢫࣃࣥẚ 0.075 ࣔࢹࣝ௨እ㸪ξH ࡟ࡼࡾ⏕ࡌࡿ ࡿ࡜ᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆ㐣ᑠホ౯ࡍࡿ㸬ಶᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦࡢ᭷ຠᗙᒅ㛗
ᗙᒅࡀศ㢮࡛ࡁࡿ㸬 ࡉࢆ⥺ᙧᗙᒅゎᯒࡼࡾᐃࡵࡿ࡜ࣆࣥᨭᣢ㸪࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢ࡛ࡑࢀ
5.3 ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࡢ㏆ఝ ࡒࢀಶᮦᗙᒅ≉ᐃ㒊ᮦ㛗ࡉࡢ 0.7㸪0.5 ಸ࡜࡞ࡗࡓ㸬
ᵓ㐀ィ⏬ẁ㝵࡞࡝㸪⢭⟬ࡏࡎ࡟ᗙᒅ⪏ຊࡢᴫ⟬ࡀᚲせ࡞ሙྜࡢࡓ 4) ᗙᒅ࣮ࣔࢻศ㢮ᣦᶆ ξ H ࡟ࡼࡾ⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࡢ✀㢮ࡢண ࢆ⾜࠺
ࡵ࡟㸪ᩥ⊩ 1)ࡢࡼ࠺࡟㏆ఝⓗ࡟ᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࢆ ξH ࡢ㛵ᩘ࡛⾲ࢃ ࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁ㸪ᴫࡋ࡚㜈್ 4.86 ௨ୗ࡛ࡣಶᮦᗙᒅ㸪ࡑࢀ௨ୖ࡛
ࡍࡇ࡜ࢆヨࡳࡿ㸬඲యᗙᒅ㸪ಶᮦᗙᒅࢆ㏻ࡋ࡚⤫୍ⓗ࡟ゎᯒ⤖ᯝࢆ ࡣ඲యᗙᒅࡀ⏕ࡌࡿ㸬
ᅇᖐࡋ㸪౛࠼ࡤࣆࣥᨭᣢࡢሙྜᘧ(15-a)㸪࣮࣮ࣟࣛᨭᣢࡢሙྜᘧ(15- 5) ᙎᛶᗙᒅ⪏ຊࡢᴫ⟬࡟⏝࠸ࡿᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࢆ㏆ఝࡍࡿ ξH
b)ࡢ㏆ఝᘧࢆᚓࡿ(Fig.15)㸬 ࡢ㛵ᩘࢆ⤒㦂ⓗ࡟సᡂࡋࡓ㸬࡞࠾ ξH ࡟ࡣ௒ᅇࡢᩘ್ゎᯒ⤖ᯝ
0.53 ࡟౫Ꮡࡍࡿᩘ್ࡀྵࡲࢀ㸪㝈ᐃࡉࢀࡓ᮲௳࡛ࡢ᳨ウ࡛ࡶ࠶ࡿࡓ
D0  0.46 (15-a)
1  14.1 u exp ^6.92 u [ H  5.31` ࡵ㸪ỗ⏝ᛶ࡟ࡣ㝈ᗘࡀ࠶ࡿ㸬
0.55
D0  0.39 (15-b)
1  14.5 u exp ^10.3 u [ H  4.96` ㅰ㎡
 ᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆᴫ⟬ࡍࡿ㝿ࡣ㸪ࡲࡎ ξH ࡛⏕ࡌࡿᗙᒅࡢ✀㢮ࢆุᐃ
ࡋ㸪඲యᗙᒅࡢሙྜࡣᘧ(2)(11), ಶᮦᗙᒅࡢሙྜࡣ γN ࢆቃ⏺᮲௳࡟ ᮏ◊✲ࡢ୍㒊ࡣ⛉◊㈝ᇶ┙(C)(ㄢ㢟␒ྕ 18K04440)࡟ࡼࡗࡓ㸬

ᛂࡌ࡚ᐃࡵࡓୖ࡛ᘧ(11)(12)(13)࡛⥺ᙧᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࢆ⟬ᐃࡋ㸪ᘧ(15-
ཧ⪃ᩥ⊩
a,b)ࡢᙎᛶᗙᒅపῶಀᩘࢆ஌ࡌࡿ㸬
1) AIJ Buckling and strength of Latticed Shells, 2010.6(in Japanese)
2.5
αH=α0-m/α0-all ᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍㸸ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢᗙᒅ࡜⪏ຊ㸪2010.6
Table 4 Analysis coefficient
2) AIJ Recommendation for Design of Latticed Shell Roof Structures,
2.0 2.18 Pin Roller 2016.11(in Japanese)
1.58
1.5 Knockdown ᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍㸸ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝᒇ᰿ᵓ㐀タィᣦ㔪㸪2016.11
αH 1.56 2.18
factor ratio 3) IASS WG8 㸸 (Draft) Guide to Buckling Load Evaluation of Metal
1.0 Buckling length Reticulated Roof structures㸪2014
k 0.7 0.5
Pin coefficient 4) H.C.Saw, K.K. Choong, V.W. Tong, S.K.Wong, K.S.Chew, S.T. Tang :
0.5 Roller Iconic Roof of Setia SPICE Convention Centre Penang Malaysia –
Buckling load
γ 1.10 0.87 Architectural and Engineering Aspect of Organic Form Single Layer
Rise/Span analysis coefficient all
0.0 Latticed Grids Steel Shell Roof, Proceedings of the 12th Asian Pacific
0.075 0.1 0.125 Conference on Shell & Spatial Structures, APCS2018, pp.14-24,
Fig.14 Knockdown factor ratio
2018.10
1.2
α0 Different type of 5) S.L.Chan, Y.P.Liu, S.W.Liu : Application and Recent Research on
buckling by initial Direct Analysis with Completed Project in Macau and Hong Kong,
1
imperfection type Proceedings of the 12th Asian Pacific Conference on Shell & Spatial
Eq.(15-b)
0.8 Structures, APCS2018, pp.48-55, 2018.10
Member buckling
6) Ueki, T., Mukaiyama, Y. and Kato, S.: Linear and elastic buckling
0.6 loads of latticed shells with elastic springs at both ends of members,
Eq.(15-a) Case study with spherical latticed shells on rectangular plan, Journal
0.4 of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ) ,
Rise/Span=0.075
Rise/Span 0.075 No.411, pp.117-129, 1990.5 (in Japanese)
Overall buckling
0.2 Rise/Span=0.1
p ᳜ᮌ㝯ྖ㸪ྥᒣὒ୍㸪ຍ⸨ྐ㑻㸸୧➃࡟ᅇ㌿ࣂࢿࡢ࠶ࡿ㒊ᮦ࡛ᵓᡂࡉࢀ
Rise/Span=0.125 ξH=4
=4.86
86 ξH ࡿ༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢻ࣮࣒ࡢ⥺ᙧཬࡧᙎᛶᗙᒅⲴ㔜㸪▴ᙧᖹ㠃ᙧ≧ࢆࡋࡓ⿢᩿
0 ⌫Ẇ≧ࢻ࣮࣒࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍ᵓ㐀⣔ㄽᩥሗ࿌㞟㸪➨ 411 ྕ㸪
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
pp.117-129㸪1990.5
Fig.15 Relationship between α0 and ξH

─ 665 ─
7) Kato, S. and Kim, J.: Study on estimation method of elasto-plastic ௜㘓 ༢఩୕ゅᙧࡢ➼౯ᗙᒅ㛗ࡉ
buckling strength of single layer reticulated domes under
 ௨ୗ㸪ᩥ⊩ 13)ࢆࡶ࡜࡟࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ἲ࡟ࡼࡿ༢఩୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࡢᗙ
intermediate loadings, Journal of Structural and Construction
Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), No.562, pp.67-74, 2002.12 (in ᒅⲴ㔜࠿ࡽ➼౯࡞ᗙᒅ㛗ࡉࢆồࡵࡿ㸬
Japanese) 㒊ᮦ㛗ࡉࢆ l㸪᭤ࡆ๛ᛶ EI ࡜ࡍࡿ㸬ᅄ㎶࡟➼ࡋ࠸ศᕸⲴ㔜ࢆཷࡅ
ຍ⸨ྐ㑻㸪㔠㙂ᩄ㸸୰㛫Ⲵ㔜ࢆཷࡅࡿ༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢻ࣮࣒ࡢᗙᒅⲴ㔜ࡢ᥎
ࡿ࡜௬ᐃࡍࡿ࡜ྛ⠇Ⅼࡢ➼౯࡞Ⲵ㔜ࡣ Fig.A1 ࡜࡞ࡿ㸬ࡲࡓ㸪Fig.A1
ᐃἲ࡟㛵ࡍࡿ◊✲㸪᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍ᵓ㐀⣔ㄽᩥ㞟㸪➨ 562 ྕ㸪pp.67-74㸪
2002.12 ࡢࡼ࠺࡟ᗙᒅࡍࡿ࡜௬ᐃࡍࡿ㸬㒊ᮦ㍈ຊࡣᘧ(A1)࡜࡞ࡿ㸬
8) M. Yamada and T. Ishikawa: Comparison between Frame - and Shell- P
Analysis on Buckling of Reticulated Spherical Shells, Summaries of N (A1)
3
Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan.
B , Structures-Ϩ, pp.269-270, 1986.8(in Japanese) ᩳࡵ㒊ᮦ(g 㒊ᮦ)ࡢᗙᒅἼᩘࡣ 1 Ἴ㸪Ỉᖹ㒊ᮦ(h 㒊ᮦ)ࡢᗙᒅἼᩘࡣ
ᒣ⏣኱ᙪ㸪▼ᕝᬛ❶㸸༢ᒙ๛᥋ࣛࢳࢫࢩ࢙ࣝࡢᗙᒅ࡟㛵ࡍࡿࣇ࣮࣒ࣞゎ 2 Ἴ(Fig.A2)࡛㸪ࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢኚ఩㛵ᩘࢆᘧ(A2)࡛⾲ࢃࡍ㸬
ᯒ࡜ࢩ࢙ࣝゎᯒࡢᑐᛂᛶ࡟㛵ࡍࡿ◊✲㸪᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍኱఍Ꮫ⾡ㅮ₇᱾ᴫ
§ Sx · § 2Sx ·
㞟. B㸪ᵓ㐀-Ϩ㸪pp.269-270㸪1986.8 yg G g sin ¨ ¸ ࠉࠉy h G h sin ¨ ¸ (A2)
9) MSC Software, Marc® 2017, Volume A: Theory and User Information, © l ¹ © l ¹
Volume B: Element library, 2017 ࡇࡇ࡛㸪yg㸪yh ࡣ㒊ᮦࡢ௵ពࡢⅬ x ࡛ࡢኚ఩࡛࠶ࡾ㸪δg㸪δh ࡣࡑࡢ᭱
10) S. Kato, Y. Yamauchi and T. Ueki : Buckling Load of Elliptic
኱᣺ᖜ࡛࠶ࡿ㸬௨ୖࢆ⏝࠸࡚ྛ㒊ᮦࡢ᭤ࡆࡦࡎࡳ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ΔUg㸪
Paraboloidal Single Layer Reticulated Roofs under Uniform Load,
International Journal of Space Structures, Vol.20, No.2, pp.91-106, ΔUh ࢆồࡵࡿ࡜ᘧ(A3)࡜࡞ࡿ㸬
2005.
S 2 EI 4S 2 EI
11) S. Kato, Y. Yamauchi, T. Ueki and K. Okuhira : Buckling Load of 'U g G g 2 ࠉ'U h G h2ࠉ (A3)
Elliptic Paraboloidal Single Layer Reticulated Roofs with Simple 4l 3 l3
Supports under Uniform Load, International Journal of Space ᨾ࡟ᗙᒅ᫬ࡢෆຊࡦࡎࡳ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ΔU ࡣᘧ(A4)࡜࡞ࡿ㸬
Structures, Vol.20, No.4, pp.211-224, 2005. 2
S 4 EI §¨ G g ·
12) S. Kato, T. Ueki and S. Zakazawa : Estimation of Buckling Loads of 'U  4G h 2 ¸ (A4)
Elliptic Paraboloidal Single Layer Lattice Domes under Vertical l3 ¨ 2 ¸
© ¹
Loads, International Journal of Space Structures, Vol.21, No.4,
pp.173-182, 2006.
༢఩୕ゅᙧ᱁Ꮚࡢእຊ࣏ࢸࣥࢩ࢚ࣕࣝࢿࣝࢠ࣮ΔT ࡣእຊ P ࡜㒊
13) Stephen P. Timoshenko and James M. Gere : Theory of elastic ᮦ᪉ྥኚ఩࠿ࡽᘧ(A5)࡛ồࡵࡽࢀࡿ㸬
stability second edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1961.
14) Japanese Architectural Standard Specification JASS6 Steel 'T
3S 2 P
8l

G g 2  4G h 2  (A5)
Work,2015.3(in Japanese)
᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍㸪ᘓ⠏ᕤ஦ᶆ‽௙ᵝ᭩ JASS6 㕲㦵ᕤ஦㸪2015.3 ᗙᒅⲴ㔜 Pcr ࡣෆຊࡦࡎࡳ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮࡜እຊ࣏ࢸࣥࢩ࢚ࣕࣝࢿࣝࢠ
15) Iwamoto, T., Nakazawa, S. and Kato, S.: Study on estimation of ࣮ࡀ➼ࡋ࠸᫬࡛࠶ࡾ Fig.A2 ࡢࡼ࠺࡟㒊ᮦࡓࢃࡳゅࡀ➼ࡋ࠸࡜௬ᐃ
buckling strength of single layer latticed domes under dead load,
Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural
ࡋ㸪ᘧ(A4)㸪(A5)ࢆ➼್ࡋ࡚ᘧ(A6)࡜࡞ࡿ㸬
Institute of Japan, Structures-Ϩ, pp.819-820㸪2014.9(in Japanese) 2 3S 2 EI
ᒾඖ㈗ᖾ㸪୰⃝⚈஧㸪ຍ⸨ྐ㑻㸸ᅛᐃⲴ㔜ࢆཷࡅࡿ༢ᒙࣛࢳࢫࢻ࣮࣒ࡢ Pcr (A6)
l2
ᗙᒅ⪏ຊ᥎ᐃ࡟㛵ࡍࡿ◊✲㸪᪥ᮏᘓ⠏Ꮫ఍኱఍Ꮫ⾡ㅮ₇᱾ᴫ㞟㸪ᵓ㐀-
Ϩ㸪pp.819-820㸪2014.9 ᘧ(A6)ࢆ㒊ᮦ㍈ຊ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ゎࡃ࡜ᗙᒅⲴ㔜 Pcr ࡢ࡜ࡁࡢ㒊ᮦ㍈ຊ
Ncr ࡣᘧ(A7)࡛࠶ࡾᗙᒅ㛗ࡉಀᩘࡣ 0.71 ࡜࡞ࡿ㸬

S 2 EI
N cr (A7)
0.7072 u l 2


P
δg

δh
 3
P  3
P
2 2 θ
y

2 2 x
P P

Fig.A1 Buckling of the unit triangle grid Fig.A2 Buckling of a member

─ 666 ─
ELASTIC BUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF SPHERICAL TRIANGLAR GRID SHELLS COMPOSED OF
H-SHAPED STEEL ON RECTANGULAR PLAN
ELASTIC BUCKLING BEHAVIOR OF SPHERICAL TRIANGULAR GRID SHELLS
COMPOSED OF H-SHAPED㸨1 STEEL ON RECTANGULAR PLAN
Kai KAGEYAMA 㸨2
and Tetsuo YAMASHITA
Kai KAGEYAMA ＊1 and Tetsuo YAMASHITA ＊2
㸨1
Kanebako Structural Eng., M.Eng.
＊1
 Kanebako Structural
(FormerEng., M.Eng.
Grad. (Former
Student, Grad. Student,
Architecture Architecture
program program
in Graduate in Graduate
School, KogakuinSchool, Kogakuin University)
University.)
＊2
㸨 2  Prof., School of Architecture, Kogakuin University, Dr.Eng.
Prof., School of Architecture, Kogakuin University, Dr.Eng.

Latticed shells made of H-shaped steel have been constructed all over the world. This study investigates elastic
buckling of spherical latticed shells made of H-shaped steel. Out-of-plane shell-like buckling and in-plane member
buckling dominantly occur in the elastic buckling of rigidly jointed latticed shells. An H-shaped section has strong and
weak axes. Since bending stiffness on the strong axis is several times of that on the weak axis, in-plane member
buckling is more likely to occur than the buckling of the shells made of pipes.
In the present study, the latticed shells for study were on the square plan of 20m x 20m. The shells were relatively flat
where the rise-span ratios of the two central arcs were between 0.075 and 0.125. In the linear-buckling (eigenvalue)
analysis, in-plane member buckling appears in the 1 st buckling mode in all the FE models. The depth, area and second
moment of inertia on the strong axis were uniformly set to 20cm, 25cm 2 and 2000cm4, respectively. On the other hand,
the second moment of inertia on the weak axis was parametrically changed so that the higher order linear buckling
load where shell-like buckling firstly appeared was 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 times of the 1st linear member buckling load. In
addition, two boundary conditions, pin and roller were assumed since roller is often used in actually constructed shells.
The higher order linear buckling loads agreed well with the classical shell-like buckling loads calculated using the
continuum analogy.
To estimate member buckling load itself, the buckling length is required. The buckling length calculated using the
linear buckling analysis, is 0.7 and 0.5 times of the member length for the roller and pin supported shells, respectively.
In the pin-supported shells, uniform compression is realized but in the roller-supported shells, compression and
tension mix especially on the peripheral where the member buckling occurs. The tensioned members connected to the
compressed member interfere the buckling of compressed member.
In the elastic buckling analysis considering geometrical nonlinearity, shell-like buckling firstly occurred when the
higher-order linear shell-like buckling loads were over 2 times of the 1 st member buckling load on the roller-supported
shells and over 1.5 times on the pin-supported shells. This reverse of buckling type is due to significant geometric
nonlinearity in the shell-like buckling. The knockdown factor was approximately 0.7 and 0.4 for the pin and roller
supported shells, respectively. But in the member buckling, it was almost over 0.9.
For latticed shells made of pipe, the shell-likeness factor was already proposed as an index to estimate the buckling
type in elastic nonlinear buckling. Here it was modified for the application to those made of H-shaped steel. When it
is over 4.86, shell-like buckling occurs.

（2018 年 11 月 10 日原稿受理，2019 年 1 月 25 日採用決定）

─ 667 ─