Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A bstract-High- altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP), In this paper, a strict implicit translation equation group of
ultrawide-band pulse (UWB) and lightning electromagnetic pulse the parameters is deduced. With the goals of simplicity and
(LEMP) are often mathematically described by a double precision, a simplified translation system of equations is
exponential function. In practice, the physical parameters of the proposed with correction terms for parameter estimation based
pulse and the mathematical parameters of the function must on the statistical method described in [3] and [4]. Finally, the
often be transformed into each other. In this paper, a strict
estimation errors are analysed.
implicit translation equation group of parameters is deduced.
Meanwhile, a simplified translation system of equations for
parameter estimation is proposed based on statistical method. IT. SHAPE PROPERTIES OF DOUBLE EXPONENTIAL PULSE
Two groups of correction terms are also given to improve the The double exponential pulse can be described as follows:
estimation precision. The estimation results demonstrate that the
overall estimation error is less than 2.9%.
(1)
Keywords-double exponential function; parameter estimation;
high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP); ultrawide-band pulse where Eo is the amplitude of the pulse, a and {J are parameters
(UWE); lightning electromagnetic pulse (LEMP); characterizing the rise and fall time, and u(t) is a step unit
function. A fourth parameter k can be calculated by
I. INTRODUCTION
Authorized licensed use limited to: Wonkwang Univ. Downloaded on April 27,2022 at 00:29:49 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
.. .. .. ... • • • • --." .!" ..!){)(l'...l" 1 7th Asia Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility I
where tlO% and t90% denote the time at which the magnitude tFWHM . t, . a· fJ = l.505 + ll, (11)
equals 10% and 90% of Eo. The values of tlO% and t90% satisfy
(4) and (5):
where �1 and �2 are correction terms used to improve the
estimation precision. Assuming that �1 and �2 are constant,
k (e-al,ll% - e-pI,O% ) = 0.1 (4) the parameters can be calculated from (11) .
0.8 2.5r-����,
(6)
·7" ":"-
' -""3 --' ' O'roo 10' 10' 10'
10 10 10
pia pia
(6) - (4)x e-PI, (a) Parameters at, versus pia (b) Parameters atfWHM versus pia
Fig. 2. Parameters at, and atfwHM for jJla ranging from 1.001 to 10000.
(7)
(6) - (4)xe-a',
(8)
Thus, the parameter tr can be eliminated by (7) and (8). 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
9J 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
The relationship among a, 13, tf can be written as (9): alp pia
[k (e -a - e-PI, )
"
P ] [ k(
=
e
-a" _
e P )
- I, ] a
(9)
(a) Variations in parameter a2fFWHM (b) Variations in parameter a2fFWHM
Fig. 3. Variations in parameters a2t2FwHM and ajJI,tFWHM.
0.9 - O. le -Pl, 0.9 - O. le -m, The parameters tf and tFWHM can be calculated as (12 ) when a
and 13 are known.
In the same way, the relationship among a, 13, tFWHM can be
deduced as (10): 1
=
[ k( ] [k ]
tFWHM
P a
a
e -alrvmM - e -PII'\\",M ) =
(e -alrVmM - e -PlrVmM ) 1 l.SOS+�
(10) 2
= ------=-
0.5 - O.Se-plrVmM 0.5 - O.Se-alrWl1M t (12 )
, tpWHM af3
538
Authorized licensed use limited to: Wonkwang Univ. Downloaded on April 27,2022 at 00:29:49 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
.. .. .. ... • • • • --." .!" ..!){)(l'...l" 1 7th Asia Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility I
The sum of the two exponential functions is used to fit -relative error of
--relative error of
the correction terms for varying values of a/j3 under � �
.S 1
condition 1 and for varying values of tFWHM/tf under condition ......---------------------------------'
.....
C ..-..------------------------------
2. The fitting results for L11 and L12 are given by (14) and (15), ....
{
�0
respective Iy.
.,
-21l ] 9l -O
l.8e a - O.ISe IX 'O��2000;cc --4""OOO�-c6""OOOvc-'8O"' OO�""0000
1 .30�-C5""OOO--1COCOOO� �15COO�2�OO�O�250""O�300�O
L11 = (14) jJla tFWHMitr
43
-0. 9 4 trv,.'HM - 13
tF\VHM
(a) Relative errors of IFWHM and I, (b) Relative estimation errors of a and jJ
{
t 2 t
-0.6461e , +3.2993xlO+ le , +0.005
Fig. 5. Relative estimation errors of IFWHM and I, versus jJla and relative
estimation errors of a and jJ versus IFWHM/I,.
-o ll -ooll
0.0ge IX - 0.18e IX
L1 2 = (15) _.relative error of t
FWHM
_0.039821r\\'1TM _0.95091r\\'1TM -relative error of t
t, t, r
-0.2066e +4.0ISe +0.005
2
L1 \ =a f�wHM - 5.4 ; - 0.485 (16) -4Q--;c5�OO---:1c;c;OO=O---;-;15C;c;OO;-2c;C;--0 OO=O--=25C;c;OO�3�OO=O
tFWHM/tr
0.1 01 0.1
01
539
Authorized licensed use limited to: Wonkwang Univ. Downloaded on April 27,2022 at 00:29:49 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.